In vitro synergistic interaction between amphotericin B and pentamidine against Scedosporium prolificans

To develop new approaches for the treatment of invasive infections caused by Scedosporium prolificans, the in vitro interaction between amphotericin B and pentamidine against 30 clinical isolates was evaluated using a checkerboard microdilution method based on the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M38-P guidelines. The interaction between the drugs was analyzed using fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) analysis and response surface modeling. Amphotericin B alone was inactive against all the isolates. The geometric mean MIC for pentamidine was 57 micro g/ml (range, 8 to 256 micro g/ml; MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited [MIC(50)], 64 micro g/ml; MIC(90), 128 micro g/ml). The combination was synergistic against 28 of 30 isolates (93.3%) by FICI analysis and 30 of 30 (100%) by response surface modeling analysis. Antagonism was not observed.     

In vitro interactions of micafungin with amphotericin B against clinical isolates of Candida spp

The in vitro activity of amphotericin B in combination with micafungin was evaluated against 115 isolates representing seven species of Candida. Overall, the percentages of synergistic interactions were 50% and 20% when the MIC-2 (lowest drug concentration to cause a prominent reduction in growth) and MIC-0 (lowest drug concentration to cause 100% growth inhibition) end point criteria, respectively, were used. Antagonism was not observed. Some of the interactions were confirmed by time-kill assays.     

In vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium spp

We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium species with a combination of two non-culture-based techniques: the tetrazolium salt 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium-hydroxide) (XTT) colorimetric reduction assay, and fluorescent microscopy with the cellular morbidity dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC) to directly visualize hyphal damage. Amphotericin B exhibited species-specific concentration-dependent activity, with 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)s) ranging from 0.10 to 0.12 mg/ml for A. fumigatus, 0.36 to 0.53 mg/ml for A. terreus, 0.27 to > or = 32 mg/ml for F. solani, 0.41 to 0.55 mg/ml for F. oxysporum, and 0.97 and 0.65 mg/ml for S. apiospermum and S. prolificans, respectively. Similarly, itraconazole inhibited the growth of A. fumigatus and A. terreus isolates with MICs of <1 mg/ml (EC(50) 0.03 to 0.85 mg/ml) and S. apiospermum, but was not active against Fusarium species or S. prolificans. Voriconazole effectively inhibited the growth of Aspergillus, Fusarium, and S. apiospermum (EC(50) 0.10 to 3.3 mg/ml) but had minimal activity against a multidrug-resistant isolate of F. solani or S. prolificans. Hyphal damage visualized by DiBAC staining was observed more frequently with voriconazole and amphotericin B versus itraconazole. These data highlight the species-specific differences in antifungal pharmacodynamics between mold-active agents that could be relevant for the development of in vitro susceptibility breakpoints and antifungal dosing in vivo.     

In vitro interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole,fluconazole, amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine against Aspergillus spp

We investigated the in vitro interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole, fluconazole, amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine, against Aspergillus spp. We tested three isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus (one resistant to itraconazole), and two each of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus. We employed a broth microdilution-based method derived from an in vivo validated method capable of detecting itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus. We studied the effect on the MICs by calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) and fractional fungicidal concentration (FFC) (99.99% kill). Itraconazole and terbinafine were synergic or additive in all strains (FIC = 0.15-1.0). Fluconazole and terbinafine were synergic with A. fumigatus, A. terreus and A. flavus (FIC = 0.3-0.5) and indifferent with A. niger (FIC = 2) isolates. Amphotericin B and terbinafine were mostly indifferent or antagonistic (FIC = 1.0-4.02). Flucytosine and terbinafine were usually indifferent or antagonistic (FIC = 0.63-8.5). FFCs were generally in accord with FICs. The use of terbinafine in combination therapy for Aspergillus infections with azoles seems promising, whereas terbinafine and amphotericin B or flucytosine in combination were less effective.     

In vitro interaction between amphotericin B and azoles in Candida albicans.

The use of azole prophylaxis as a measure to prevent invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients is increasing and is now the standard of care in many institutions. Previous studies disagree on whether preexposure of Candida albicans to azoles affects their subsequent susceptibility to amphotericin B (AmB). The present in vitro study indicates that azole exposure generates a subpopulation of cells that are not affected by subsequent exposure to AmB. These cells that are phenotypically resistant to AmB tolerated by most cells not exposed to azole. The percentage of cells that convert to phenotypic resistance to AmB varies with the concentration and the azole. Itraconazole is more effective than fluconazole in generating cells that are phenotypically resistant to AmB and that tolerate an otherwise lethal transient exposure to AmB. Until cells that are not exposed to fluconazole are simultaneously challenged with AmB, they are not protected to a significant extent from killing by AmB. Cells that are challenged with continuous exposure to AmB also acquire phenotypic resistance to AmB at increased frequencies by azole preexposure, but this requires that the azole be continuously present during incubation with AmB. In addition, Candida cells taken from mature colonies that are not actively growing are not susceptible to the short-term killing effects of AmB without azole preexposure. The adaptive responses of C. albicans to AmB and potentially other antifungal agents that may result from prior exposure to azoles in vitro or potentially in microenvironments in vivo that induce physiological changes may have major clinical implications.     

In vitro synergisms obtained by amphotericin B and voriconazole associated with non-antifungal agents against Fusarium spp

Fusarium spp is an opportunistic fungal pathogen responsible for causing invasive hyalohyphomycosis in immunocompromised patients. Due to its susceptibility pattern with a remarkable resistance to antifungal agents the treatment failures and mortality rates are high. To overcome this situation, combination therapy may be considered which must be subjected to in vitro tests.In vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole associated with azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluvastatin, ibuprofen, metronidazole, and also the combination of amphotericin B plus rifampin against 23 strains of Fusarium spp. through the checkerboard technique based on M38-A2 [Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. (CLSI document M38-A2) (ISBN 1-56238-668-9). Wayne, PA: CLSI] were evaluated.The best synergistic interactions with amphotericin B were with ibuprofen (43.5%) (FICI [fractional inhibitory concentration index] range = 0.25–2). Combinations with voriconazole showed synergism, mainly with ciprofloxacin (30.4%) (FICI range = 0.25–3) and metronidazole (30.4%) (FICI range = 0.1–4); however, all the combinations with itraconazole were indifferent. In general, antagonistic interactions were not registered.Our results showed that in vitro synergisms obtained by some combinations studied deserve attention since they were better than those showed by the antimycotic.     

Dynamic interaction between fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus gattii

Cryptococcus gattii is the main pathogen of cryptococcosis in healthy patients and is treated mainly with fluconazole and amphotericin B. The combination of these drugs has been questioned because the mechanisms of action could lead to a theoretical antagonistic interaction. We evaluated distinct parameters involved in the in vitro combination of fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus gattii. Fourteen strains of C. gattii were used for the determination of MIC, fractional inhibitory concentration, time-kill curve, and postantifungal effect (PAFE). Ergosterol quantification was performed to evaluate the influence of ergosterol content on the interaction between these antifungals. Interaction between the drugs varied from synergistic to antagonistic depending on the strain and concentration tested. Increasing fluconazole levels were correlated with an antagonistic interaction. A total of 48 h was necessary for reducing the fungal viability in the presence of fluconazole, while 12 h were required for amphotericin B. When these antifungals were tested in combination, fluconazole impaired the amphotericin B activity. The ergosterol content decreased with the increase of fluconazole levels and it was correlated with the lower activity of amphotericin B. The PAFE found varied from 1 to 4 h for fluconazole and from 1 to 3 h for amphotericin B. The interaction of fluconazole and amphotericin B was concentration-dependent and special attention should be directed when these drugs are used in combination against C. gattii.     

In vitro synergy testing of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp

The in vitro interactions of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B were evaluated by using the checkerboard method. For Aspergillus spp., anidulafungin with amphotericin B showed indifference for 16/26 isolates, while anidulafungin with either azole showed a synergy trend for 18/26 isolates. All drug combinations showed indifference for 7/7 Fusarium sp. isolates.     

In vitro activities of amphotericin B in combination with four antifungal agents and rifampin against Aspergillus spp.

Strains of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus niger were tested for in vitro susceptibility with a microtiter plate system in buffered yeast-nitrogen base and in buffered minimal essential medium. Isolates were tested against amphotericin B, flucytosine, rifampin, ketoconazole, ICI 153,066, and Bay n 7133 and against combinations of amphotericin B with each of the other five drugs. Combinations of amphotericin B and rifampin were the most active against all three species of Aspergillus. Flucytosine combined with amphotericin B produced little or no reduction of the MICs at which 90% of the strains were inhibited compared with amphotericin B alone. With one exception, the addition of ketoconazole, ICI 153,066, or Bay n 7133 to amphotericin B did not consistently alter the MICs. The addition of ICI 153,066 markedly increased the MICs of amphotericin B against the A. flavus isolates in both media. When the azoles were tested alone, Bay n 7133 was the most active against A. fumigatus, but was two- to fivefold less active against A. flavus. Ketoconazole was the most active azole against A. flavus.     

In vitro interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole against clinical isolates of Scedosporium prolificans

In order to develop new approaches for the chemotherapy of invasive infections caused by Scedosporium prolificans, the in vitro interaction between itraconazole and terbinafine against 20 clinical isolates was studied using a checkerboard microdilution method. Itraconazole and terbinafine alone were inactive against most isolates, but the combination was synergistic against 95 and 85% of isolates after 48 and 72 h of incubation, respectively. Antagonism was not observed. The MICs obtained with the terbinafine-itraconazole combination were within levels that can be achieved in plasma.     

In vitro activity and synergism of amphotericin B, azoles and cationic antimicrobials against the emerging pathogen Trichoderma spp

OBJECTIVES: The uncommon fungal pathogen Trichoderma shows increasing medical importance particularly in immunocompromised patients. Despite systemic antifungal therapy, prognosis of Trichoderma infection is poor regardless of the type of infection and the therapy used. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro activity and synergism of double antifungal combinations including amphotericin B, voriconazole, fluconazole, chlorhexidine digluconate and Akacid plus against 15 isolates of Trichoderma longibrachiatum and 1 isolate of Trichoderma harzianum. METHODS: Individual MICs were determined by using broth microdilution method following the NCCLS M38-A guidelines with standard RPMI 1640 broth. Synergy tests were performed using the chequerboard method. RESULTS: All clinical Trichoderma strains showed reduced susceptibility to fluconazole (MICs>or=64 mg/L) and amphotericin B (MICs=2 mg/L), whereas lower MICs of 0.5-1 mg/L were detected for voriconazole. Akacid plus reached the lowest MIC values in a range of 0.06-0.5 mg/L, 4- to 32-fold higher MICs were found for chlorhexidine. No antagonism was observed for any of the antifungal combinations tested. Interaction of amphotericin B and azoles was indifferent (fractional inhibitory concentration index, FICI 2-4). The combination of one azole and one cationic biocide showed different degree of synergism (FICI 0.07-2.03). Interaction of Akacid plus and chlorhexidine resulted in synergism for each Trichoderma isolate (FICI-range 0.05-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate no interaction between antifungals and some degree of synergism between azoles and cationic antimicrobials against Trichoderma spp.     

In vitro activity of SCH-56592 and comparison with activities of amphotericin B and itraconazole against Aspergillus spp.

In this study, we investigated the in vitro activity of SCH-56592 (SCH), a new triazole antifungal agent. We compared the activity of SCH with those of itraconazole (ITZ) and amphotericin B (AB) against 60 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. by using a microtiter format. Incubation was done at 37 degrees C for 48 h, and MIC endpoints (no growth) were read visually. The medium used for all of the drugs was RPMI 1640 buffered with morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) and supplemented with 2% glucose. MICs and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs; killing of > or = 99.99%) were measured for all isolates. The geometric mean (GM) MICs and ranges (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: SCH, 0.09 and < or = 0.01 to 1; ITZ, 0.25 and 0.06 to 32; AB, 1.46 and 0.25 to 32. Aspergillus terreus (n = 7) was markedly more susceptible to SCH (GM, 0.05 microg/ml) and ITZ (GM, 0.07 microg/ml) than to AB (GM, 8.8 microg/ml). For all isolates, the GM MFCs and ranges (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: SCH, 3.64 and 0.125 to 16; ITZ, 15.09 and 0.125 to 32; AB, 10.3 and 1 to 32. In the drug concentration range tested, 71, 32, and 64% of the isolates against which SCH, ITZ, and AB, respectively, were tested were killed. A reproducibility study was performed with 20% of the isolates; for 11 of the 12 isolates retested, the MIC was the same or within 1 well of the original MIC of each drug. Therefore, in vitro mould testing of SCH is feasible and reproducible. SCH was found to be very active against all species of Aspergillus and at lower concentrations than either ITZ or AB.     

In vitro antifungal combination effects of micafungin with fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine against clinical isolates of Candida species

Micafungin (MCFG) is an echinocandin antifungal agent that exhibits potent activity against most species of Candida and Aspergillus. We investigated the in vitro antifungal combination effects of MCFG with four other antifungal agents — fluconazole (FLCZ), voriconazole (VRCZ), amphotericin B, and flucytosine — against clinical isolates of 54 Candida spp. by checkerboard analysis. The synergistic antifungal effects of MCFG-FLCZ and MCFG-VRCZ were 11% and 15%, respectively, and the latter displayed a synergistic activity of 63% against Candida glabrata. Antagonism was not observed in any of the combinations tested.     

Killing kinetics of caspofungin, micafungin, and amphotericin B against Candida guilliermondii

Amphotericin B (AMB), micafungin, and caspofungin MICs, minimal fungicidal concentrations, and time-killing curves were determined in the presence and absence of 10% inactivated serum. AMB was the only agent with consistent killing activity (time required to achieve 99.9% of growth reduction was 2.1 to 3.2 h). The presence of serum enhanced caspofungin activity but lowered those of micafungin and AMB.     

Effect of voriconazole combined with micafungin against Candida, Aspergillus, and Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium solani

Effects of voriconazole combined with micafungin against 101 isolates of Candida spp. and 100 isolates of filamentous fungi have been evaluated by in vitro checkerboard analysis. The combination was indifferent for 97% of the Candida isolates and synergistic for 64% of the filamentous fungi (79% for Aspergillus fumigatus).     

In vitro antifungal activities of amphotericin B and liposome-encapsulated amphotericin B.

The in vitro activities of liposome-encapsulated amphotericin B and free amphotericin B against Candida albicans 336 were comparable. Amphotericin B concentrations 12-fold and greater than 50-fold higher were required to kill the same organism when cholesterol and ergosterol were incorporated into the liposomes. The addition of cholesterol to liposomes caused a significant increase in the minimal fungicidal concentration of amphotericin B in 7 of 19 other yeast strains tested, whereas ergosterol caused an increase in 18 of the 19 strains.     

In vitro interactions between amphotericin B, itraconazole, and flucytosine against 21 clinical Aspergillus isolates determined by two drug interaction models

Combination therapy of flucytosine (5FC) with other antifungal agents could be of use for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. However, interpretation of the results of in vitro interactions is problematic. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index is the most commonly used method, but it has several major drawbacks in characterizing antifungal drug interaction. Alternatively, a response surface approach using the concentration-effect relationship over the whole concentration range instead of just the MIC can be used. We determined the in vitro interactions between amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole, and 5FC against 21 Aspergillus isolates with a broth microdilution checkerboard method that employs the dye MTT [3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide]. FIC indices based on three different MIC endpoints (MIC-0, MIC-1, and MIC-2) and the interaction coefficient alpha were determined, the latter by estimation from the response surface approach described by Greco et al. (W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons, Pharmacol. Rev. 47:331-385, 1995). The value obtained for the FIC index was found to be dependent on the MIC endpoint used and could be either synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. The response surface approach gave more consistent results. Of the three combinations tested, the AMB-5FC combination was the most potent in vitro against Aspergillus spp. We conclude that the use of the response surface approach for the interpretation of in vitro interaction studies of antifungals may be helpful in order to predict the nature and intensity of the drug interaction. However, the correlation of these results with clinical outcome remains difficult and needs to be further investigated.