Preliminary experience with frameless stereotactic radiotherapy

Purpose: To report initial clinical experience with a novel high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system.Methods and Materials: Sixty patients ranging in age from 2 to 82 years received a total of 1426 treatments with the University of Florida frameless stereotactic radiotherapy system. Of the total, 39 (65%) were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) alone, and 21 (35%) received SRT as a component of radiotherapy. Pathologic diagnoses included meningiomas (15 patients), low-grade astrocytomas (11 patients), germinomas (9 patients), and craniopharyngiomas (5 patients). The technique was used as means of dose escalation in 11 patients (18%) with aggressive tumors. Treatment reproducibility was measured by comparing bite plate positioning registered by infrared light-emitting diodes (IRLEDs) with the stereotactic radiosurgery reference system, and with measurements from each treatment arc for the 1426 daily treatments (5808 positions). We chose 0.3 mm vector translation error and 0.3° rotation about each axis as the maximum tolerated misalignment before treating each arc.Results: With a mean follow-up of 11 months, 3 patients had recurrence of malignant disease. Acute side effects were minimal. Of 11 patients with low grade astrocytomas, 4 (36%) had cerebral edema and increased enhancement on MR scans in the first year, and 2 required steroids. All had resolution and marked tumor involution on follow-up imaging. Bite plate reproducibility was as follows. Translational errors: anterior-posterior, 0.01 ± 0.10; lateral, 0.02 ± 0.07; axial, 0.01 ± 0.10. Rotational errors (degrees): anterior-posterior, 0.00 ± 0.03; lateral, 0.00 ± 0.06; axial, 0.01 ± 0.04. No patient treatment was delivered beyond the maximum tolerated misalignment. Daily treatment was delivered in approximately 15 min per patient.Conclusion: Our initial experience with stereotactic radiotherapy using the infrared camera guidance system was good. Patient selection and treatment strategies are evolving rapidly. Treatment accuracy was the best reported, and the treatment approach was practical.     

Isocenter accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy using implanted fiducials

PURPOSE: The stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) system verifies isocenter accuracy in patient space. In this study, we evaluate isocenter accuracy in frameless SRT using implanted cranial gold markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed frameless SRT on 43 intracranial tumor patients between August 1997 and December 2000. The treatment technique was determined by the tumor shape and volume, and by the location of critical organs. The coordinates of anterior-posterior and lateral port film were inputted to ISOLOC software, which calculated (1) the couch moves translation distance required to bring the target point to the isocenter, and (2) the intermarker distance comparisons between the CT study and the treatment machine films. We evaluated the isocenter deviation based on the error between orthogonal film target coordinates and isocenter coordinates. RESULTS: The mean treatment isocenter deviations (x, y, z) were -0.03, 0.14, and -0.04 mm, respectively. The systematic component isocenter standard deviations were 0.28, 0.31, and 0.35 mm (1 SD), respectively, and the random component isocenter standard deviations were 0.53, 0.52, and 0.50 mm (1 SD), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The isocenter accuracy in the frameless SRT-implanted fiducial system is highly reliable and is comparable to that of other stereotactic radiosurgery systems.     

Image localization for frameless stereotactic radiotherapy

Purpose: Infrared light-emitting diodes (IRLEDs) have been used for optic-guided stereotactic radiotherapy localization at the University of Florida since 1995. The current paradigm requires stereotactic head ring placement for the patient’s first fraction. The stereotactic coordinates and treatment plan are determined relative to this head ring. The IRLEDs are attached to the patient via a maxillary bite plate, and the position of the IRLEDs relative to linac isocenter is saved to file. These positions are then recalled for each subsequent treatment to position the patient for fractionated therapy. The purpose of this article was to report a method of predicting the desired IRLED locations without need for the invasive head ring.

Methods and Materials: To achieve the goal of frameless optic-guided radiotherapy, a method is required for direct localization of the IRLED positions from a CT scan. Because it is difficult to localize the exact point of light emission from a CT scan of an IRLED, a new bite plate was designed that contains eight aluminum fiducial markers along with the six IRLEDs. After a calibration procedure to establish the spatial relationship of the IRLEDs to the aluminum fiducial markers, the stereotactic coordinates of the IRLED light emission points are determined by localizing the aluminum fiducial markers in a stereotactic CT scan.

Results: To test the accuracy of direct CT determination of the IRLED positions, phantom tests were performed. The average accuracy of isocenter localization using the IRLED bite plate was 0.65 ± 0.17 mm for these phantom tests. In addition, the optic-guided system has a unique compatibility with the stereotactic head ring. Therefore, the isocentric localization capability was clinically tested using the stereotactic head ring as the absolute standard. The ongoing clinical trial has shown the frameless system to provide a patient localization accuracy of 1.11 ± 0.3 mm compared with the head ring.

Conclusion: Optic-guided radiotherapy using IRLEDs provides a mechanism through which setup accuracy may be improved over conventional techniques. To date, this optic-guided therapy has been used only as a hybrid system that requires use of the stereotactic head ring for the first fraction. This has limited its use in the routine clinical setting. Computation of the desired IRLED positions eliminates the need for the invasive head ring for the first fraction. This allows application of optic-guided therapy to a larger cohort of patients, and also facilitates the initiation of extracranial optic-guided radiotherapy.     

The accuracy of frameless stereotactic intracranial radiosurgery

Purpose

To determine the accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using the BrainLAB ExacTrac system and robotic couch by measuring the individual contributions such as the accuracy of the imaging and couch correction system, the linkage between this system and the linac isocenter and the possible intrafraction motion of the patient in the frameless mask.

Materials and methods

An Alderson head phantom with hidden marker was randomly positioned 31 times. Automated 6D couch shifts were performed according to ExacTrac and the deviation with respect to the linac isocenter was measured using the hidden marker. ExacTrac-based set-up was performed for 46 patients undergoing hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for 135 fractions, followed by verification X-rays. Forty-three of these patients received post-treatment X-ray verification for 79 fractions to determine the intrafraction motion.

Results

The hidden target test revealed a systematic error of 1.5 mm in one direction, which was corrected after replacement of the system calibration phantom. The accuracy of the ExacTrac positioning is approximately 0.3 mm in each direction, 1 standard deviation. The intrafraction motion was 0.35 ± 0.21 mm, maximum 1.15 mm.

Conclusion

Intrafraction motion in the BrainLAB frameless mask is very small. Users are strongly advised to perform an independent verification of the ExacTrac isocenter in order to avoid systematic deviations.     

Intrafraction variations in linac-based image-guided radiosurgery of intracranial lesions

PurposeThis study investigated image-guided patient positioning during frameless, mask-based, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial lesions and intrafractional translational and rotational variations in patient positions.Patients and methodsA non-invasive head and neck thermoplastic mask was used for immobilization. The Exactrac/Novalis Body system (BrainLAB AG, Germany) was used for kV X-ray imaging guided positioning. Intrafraction displacement data, obtained by imaging after each new table position, were evaluated.ResultsThere were 269 radiosurgery treatments performed on 190 patients and a total of 967 setups within different angles. The first measured error after each table rotation (mean 2.6) was evaluated (698 measurements). Intrafraction translational errors were (1 standard deviation [SD]) on average 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7 mm for the left–right, superior–inferior, and anterior–posterior directions, respectively, with a mean 3D-vector of 1.0 mm (SD 0.9 mm) and a range from –5 mm to +5 mm. On average, 12%, 3%, and 1% of the translational deviations exceeded 1, 2, and 3 mm, respectively, in the three directions.ConclusionThe range of intrafraction patient motion in frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery is often not fully mapped by pre- and post-treatment imaging. In the current study, intrafraction motion was assessed by performing measurements at several time points during the course of stereotactic radiosurgery. It was determined that 12% of the intrafraction values in the three dimensions are above 1 mm, the usual safety margin applied in stereotactic radiosurgery.     

Ultrasound-guided extracranial radiosurgery: technique and application

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for many intracranial lesions, but target mobility limits its utility for extracranial applications. We have developed a new technique for extracranial radiosurgery based on optically guided three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS). The 3DUS system provides the ability to image the target volume and critical structures in real time and determine any misregistration of the target volume with the linear accelerator. In this paper, we describe the system and its initial clinical application in the treatment of localized metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The extracranial stereotactic system consists of an ultrasound unit that is optically tracked and registered with the linear accelerator coordinate system. After an initial patient positioning based on computed tomographic (CT) simulation, stereotactic ultrasound images are acquired and correlated with the CT-based treatment plan to determine any soft-tissue shifts between the time of the planning CT and the actual treatment. Optical tracking is used to correct any patient offsets that are revealed by the real-time imaging. RESULTS: Preclinical testing revealed that the ultrasound-based stereotactic navigation system is accurate to within 1.5 mm in comparison with an absolute coordinate phantom. Between March 2001 and March 2002, the system was used to deliver extracranial radiosurgery to 17 metastatic lesions in 16 patients. Treatments were delivered in 1 or 2 fractions, with an average fractional dose of 16 Gy (range 12.5-24 Gy) delivered to the 80% isodose surface. Before each fraction, the target misalignment from isocenter was determined using the 3DUS system and the misalignments averaged over all patients were anteroposterior = 4.8 mm, lateral = 3.6 mm, axial = 2.1 mm, and average total 3D displacement = 7.4 mm (range = 0-21.0 mm). After correcting patient misalignment, each plan was delivered as planned using 6-11 noncoplanar fields. No acute complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A system for high-precision radiosurgical treatment of metastatic tumors has been developed, tested, and applied clinically. Optical tracking of the ultrasound probe provides real-time tracking of the patient anatomy and allows computation of the target displacement before treatment delivery. The patient treatments reported here suggest the feasibility and safety of the technique.     

Reduction of radiation pneumonitis by V20-constraints in breast cancer

Background

To assess the accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) using a stereotactic mask fixation system.

Patients and Methods

Sixteen patients treated with FSRT were involved in the study. A commercial stereotactic mask fixation system (BrainLAB AG) was used for patient immobilization. Serial CT scans obtained before and during FSRT were used to assess the accuracy of patient immobilization by comparing the isocenter position. Daily portal imaging were acquired to establish day to day patient position variation. Displacement errors along the different directions were calculated as combination of systematic and random errors.

Results

The mean isocenter displacements based on localization and verification CT imaging were 0.1 mm (SD 0.3 mm) in the lateral direction, 0.1 mm (SD 0.4 mm) in the anteroposterior, and 0.3 mm (SD 0.4 mm) in craniocaudal direction. The mean 3D displacement was 0.5 mm (SD 0.4 mm), being maximum 1.4 mm. No significant differences were found during the treatment (P = 0.4). The overall isocenter displacement as calculated by 456 anterior and lateral portal images were 0.3 mm (SD 0.9 mm) in the mediolateral direction, -0.2 mm (SD 1 mm) in the anteroposterior direction, and 0.2 mm (SD 1.1 mm) in the craniocaudal direction. The largest displacement of 2.7 mm was seen in the cranio-caudal direction, with 95% of displacements < 2 mm in any direction.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the setup error of the presented mask system evaluated by CT verification scans and portal imaging are minimal. Reproducibility of the isocenter position is in the best range of positioning reproducibility reported for other stereotactic systems.     

A clinical comparison of patient setup and intra-fraction motion using frame-based radiosurgery versus a frameless image-guided radiosurgery system for intracranial lesions

Background and purpose

A comparison of patient positioning and intra-fraction motion using invasive frame-based radiosurgery with a frameless X-ray image-guided system utilizing a thermoplastic mask for immobilization.

Materials and methods

Overall system accuracy was determined using 57 hidden-target tests. Positioning agreement between invasive frame-based setup and image-guided (IG) setup, and intra-fraction displacement, was evaluated for 102 frame-based SRS treatments. Pre and post-treatment imaging was also acquired for 7 patients (110 treatments) immobilized with an aquaplast mask receiving fractionated IG treatment.

Results

The hidden-target tests demonstrated a mean error magnitude of 0.7 mm (SD = 0.3 mm). For SRS treatments, mean deviation between frame-based and image-guided initial positioning was 1.0 mm (SD = 0.5 mm). Fusion failures were observed among 3 patients resulting in aberrant predicted shifts. The image-guidance system detected frame slippage in one case. The mean intra-fraction shift magnitude observed for the BRW frame was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.3 mm) compared to 0.7 mm (SD = 0.5 mm) for the fractionated patients with the mask system.

Conclusions

The overall system accuracy is similar to that reported for invasive frame-based SRS. The intra-fraction motion was larger with mask-immobilization, but remains within a range appropriate for stereotactic treatment. These results support clinical implementation of frameless radiosurgery using the Novalis Body Exac-Trac system.     

The feasibility of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of pediatric central nervous system tumors

Recurrent malignant primary and metastatic central nervous system (CNS) tumors in pediatric patients are devastating, and efforts to improve outcomes for these patients have been disappointing. Conventional re-irradiation in these patients increases the risk of significant toxicity. We therefore evaluated feasibility and outcomes using frameless radiosurgery (FRS) in children with recurrent primary and metastatic brain tumors. We reviewed five cases of recurrent primary and metastatic brain tumors treated with frameless radiosurgery between 2008 and 2013. We analyzed safety and feasibility, dosimetric data, local control, and adverse effects. Five patients were treated with frameless radiosurgery for palliation. Fifteen target volumes were treated using our institutional FRS system. The volumes of targets ranged from 0.08 to 51.67 cm³ with doses ranging from 15 to 21 Gy. Radiosurgery was well tolerated, decreased the need for large-volume CNS irradiation, and allowed for effective palliation in this small cohort. Frameless radiosurgery is feasible in this patient population. Frameless radiosurgery should be considered in management of select patients with recurrent primary or metastatic brain tumors.     

Intracranial application of IMRT based radiosurgery to treat multiple or large irregular lesions and verification of infra-red frameless localization system

We have employed a frameless localization system for intracranial radiosurgery, utilizing a custom biteblock with fiducial markers and an infra-red camera for set-up and monitoring patient position. For multiple brain metastases or large irregular lesions, we use a single-isocenter intensity-modulated approach. We report our quality assurance measurements and our experience using Intensity Modulated Radiosurgery (IMRS) to treat such intracranial lesions. A phantom with integrated targets and fiducial markers was utilized to test the positional accuracy of the system. The frameless localization system was used for patient setup and target localization as well as for motion monitoring during treatment. Inverse optimization planning gave satisfactory dose coverage and critical organ sparing. Patient setup was guided by the infrared camera through fine adjustment in three translational and three rotational degrees for isocenter localization and verified by orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) images, taken before treatment to ensure the accuracy of treatment. The relative localization of the camera based system was verified to be highly accurate along three translational directions of couch motion and couch rotation. After verification, we began treating patients with this technique. About 8–12 properly selected fixed beams with a single isocenter were sufficient to achieve good dose coverage and organ sparing. Portal dosimetry with an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) and kV images provided excellent quality assurance for the IMRS plan and patient setup. The treatment time was less than 60 min to deliver doses of 16–20 Gy in a single fraction. The camera-based system was verified for positional accuracy and was deemed sufficiently accurate for stereotactic treatments. Single isocenter IMRS treatment of multiple brain metastases or large irregular lesions can be done within an acceptable treatment time and gives the benefits of dose-conformity and organ-sparing, easy plan QA, and patient setup verification.     

Commissioning an image-guided localization system for radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To describe the design and commissioning of a system for the treatment of classes of tumors that require highly accurate target localization during a course of fractionated external-beam therapy. This system uses image-guided localization techniques in the linac vault to position patients being treated for cranial tumors using stereotactic radiotherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques. Design constraints included flexibility in the use of treatment-planning software, accuracy and precision of repeat localization, limits on the time and human resources needed to use the system, and ease of use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A commercially marketed, stereotactic radiotherapy system, based on a system designed at the University of Florida, Gainesville, was adapted for use at the University of Washington Medical Center. A stereo pair of cameras in the linac vault were used to detect the position and orientation of an array of fiducial markers that are attached to a patient's biteblock. The system was modified to allow the use of either a treatment-planning system designed for stereotactic treatments, or a general, three-dimensional radiation therapy planning program. Measurements of the precision and accuracy of the target localization, dose delivery, and patient positioning were made using a number of different jigs and devices. Procedures were developed for the safe and accurate clinical use of the system. RESULTS: The accuracy of the target localization is comparable to that of other treatment-planning systems. Gantry sag, which cannot be improved, was measured to be 1.7 mm, which had the effect of broadening the dose distribution, as confirmed by a comparison of measurement and calculation. The accuracy of positioning a target point in the radiation field was 1.0 +/- 0.2 mm. The calibration procedure using the room-based lasers had an accuracy of 0.76 mm, and using a floor-based radiosurgery system it was 0.73 mm. Target localization error in a phantom was 0.64 +/- 0.77 mm. Errors in positioning due to couch rotation error were reduced using the system. CONCLUSION: The system described has proven to have acceptable accuracy and precision for the clinical goals for which it was designed. It is robust in detecting errors, and it requires only a nominal increase in setup time and effort. Future work will focus on evaluating its suitability for use in the treatment of head-and-neck cancers not contained within the cranial vault.     

IRLED-Based Patient Localization for Linac Radiosurgery

Purpose: Currently, precise stereotactic radiosurgery delivery is possible with the Gamma Knife or floor-stand linear accelerator (linac) systems. Couch-mounted linac radiosurgery systems, while less expensive and more flexible than other radiosurgery delivery systems, have not demonstrated a comparable level of precision. This article reports on the development and testing of an optically guided positioning system designed to improve the precision of patient localization in couch-mounted linac radiosurgery systems.Methods and Materials: The optically guided positioning system relies on detection of infrared light-emitting diodes (IRLEDs) attached to a standard target positioner. The IRLEDs are monitored by a commercially available camera system that is interfaced to a personal computer. An IRLED reference is established at the center of stereotactic space, and the computer reports the current position of the IRLEDs relative to this reference position. Using this readout from the computer, the correct stereotactic coordinate can be set directly.Results: Bench testing was performed to compare the accuracy of the optically guided system with that of a floor-stand system, that can be considered an absolute reference. This testing showed that coordinate localization using the IRLED system to track translations agreed with the absolute to within 0.1 ± 0.1 mm. As rotations for noncoplanar couch angles were included, the inaccuracy was increased to 0.2 ± 0.1 mm.Conclusions: IRLED technology improves the accuracy of patient localization relative to the linac isocenter in comparison with conventional couch-mounted systems. Further, the patient’s position can be monitored in real time as the couch is rotated for all treatment angles. Thus, any errors introduced by couch inaccuracies can be detected and corrected.     

Stereotactic frame for neuroradiology and charged particle Bragg peak radiosurgery of intracranial disorders

The application of heavy charged particle Bragg peak radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial vascular and other disorders requires a system of precise patient immobilization and stereotactic localization of defined intracranial targets. The process of using stereotactic neuroradiological procedures (including cerebral angiography, CT scanning and magnetic resonance imaging) for target definition and localization, and complex treatment planning constrain such a system to be adaptable and reusable. This paper describes a removable stereotactic frame-mask system that is used to immobilize and reposition the patient during stereotactic neuroradiological procedures and charged particle radiosurgery. It consists of four parts--(a) a plastic mask for immobilizing the patient's head; (b) a lucite-graphite mounting frame; (c) a set of fiducial markers; and (d) interfaces between the frame for immobilization and fixation to various diagnostic and therapeutic patient couches. The relationship between each component and the radiosurgical procedure is discussed. This system has proven to be safe, reliable, and noninvasive and it does not require fixation to the bones of the face or skull. When integrated into the radiosurgical treatment planning and localization procedures developed at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, it is capable of reliably repositioning the patient to 1 mm in each of three planes and contouring the intracranial target reliably to this accuracy. The application of this stereotactic system in heavy charged particle radiosurgery of intracranial arteriovenous malformations is described in other reports.     

Heavy charged-particle stereotactic radiosurgery: cerebral angiography and CT in the treatment of intracranial vascular malformations

A method is described for stereotactic localization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and for calculating treatment plans for heavy charged-particle Bragg peak radiosurgery. A stereotactic frame and head immobilization system is used to correlate the images of multivessel cerebral angiography and computed tomography. The AVM is imaged by angiography, and the frame provides the stereotactic coordinates for transfer of this target to CT images for the calculation of treatment plans. The CT data are used to calculate the residual ranges and compensation for the charged-particle beam required for each treatment port. Three-dimensional coordinates for the patient positioner are calculated, and stereotactic radiosurgery is performed. Verification of the accuracy of the stereotactic positioning is obtained with computer-generated overlays of the vascular malformation, stereotactic fiducial markers, and bony landmarks on orthogonal radiographs immediately prior to treatment. Using these procedures, the accuracy of the repositioning of the patient at each of a series of imaging and treatment procedures is typically within 1 mm in each of three orthogonal planes.     

Current status and optimal use of radiosurgery

The field of stereotactic radiosurgery is rapidly advancing as a result of both improvements in radiosurgical equipment and better physician understanding of the clinical applications of stereotactic radiosurgery. This article will review recent developments in the field of radiosurgery, including advances in our understanding of the treatment of brain metastases and arteriovenous malformations, as well as the use of stereotactic radiosurgery as a boost following conventional radiation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to minimize the rate of local recurrence. In addition, improved understanding of the radiobiology of normal neurologic structures adjacent to tumors undergoing radiosurgery has led to the use of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of acoustic neuromas and tumors bordering the anterior visual pathways. Finally, a breakthrough in radiosurgery involving the development and use of frameless, image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery has allowed for both dose homogeneity and treatment of intracranial lesions based on nonisocentric treatment algorithms that result in improved target conformality. This same frameless radiosurgical system has also expanded the scope of radiosurgery to include the treatment of extracranial lesions throughout the body.     

Frame Slippage Verification in Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose: To develop a method for detecting frame slippage in stereotactic radiosurgery by interactively matching in three dimensions Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) to portal images.Methods and Materials: DRRs are superimposed over orthogonal edge-detected portal image pairs obtained prior to treatment. By interactively manipulating the CT data in three dimensions (rotations and translations) new DRRs are generated and overlaid with the orthogonal portal images. This method of matching is able to account for ambiguities due to rotations and translations outside of the imaging plane. The matching procedure is performed with anatomical structures, and is used in tandem with a fiducial marker array attached to the stereotactic frame. The method is evaluated using portal images simulated from patient CT data and then tested using a radiographic head phantom.Results: For simulation tests a mean radial alignment error of 0.82 mm was obtained with the 3D matching method compared to a mean error of 3.52 mm when using conventional matching techniques. For the head phantom tests the mean alignment displacement error for each of the stereotactic coordinates was found to be Δx = 0.95 mm, Δy = 1.06 mm, Δz = 0.99 mm, with a mean error radial of 1.94 mm (SD = 0.61 mm).Conclusion: Results indicate that the accuracy of the system is appropriate for stereotactic radiosurgery, and is therefore an effective tool for verification of frame slippage.     

Noninvasive patient fixation for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the setup accuracy that can be achieved with a novel noninvasive patient fixation technique based on a body cast attached to a recently developed stereotactic body frame during fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one CT studies (> or = 20 slices, thickness: 3 mm) from 5 patients who were immobilized in a body cast attached to a stereotactic body frame for treatment of paramedullary tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine were evaluated with respect to setup accuracy. The immobilization device consisted of a custom-made wrap-around body cast that extended from the neck to the thighs and a separate head mask, both made from Scotchcast. Each CT study was performed immediately before or after every second or third actual treatment fraction without repositioning the patient between CT and treatment. The stereotactic localization system was mounted and the isocenter as initially located stereotactically was marked with fiducials for each CT study. Deviation of the treated isocenter as compared to the planned position was measured in all three dimensions. RESULTS: The immobilization device can be easily handled, attached to and removed from the stereotactic frame and thus enables treatment of multiple patients with the same stereotactic frame each day. Mean patient movements of 1.6 mm+/-1.2 mm (laterolateral [LL]), 1.4 mm+/-1.0 mm (anterior-posterior [AP]), 2.3 mm+/-1.3 mm (transversal vectorial error [VE]) and < slice thickness = 3 mm (craniocaudal [CC]) were recorded for the targets in the thoracic spine and 1.4 mm+/-1.0 mm (LL), 1.2 mm+/-0.7 mm (AP), 1.8 mm+/-1.2 mm (VE), and < 3 mm (CC) for the lumbar spine. The worst case deviation was 3.9 mm for the first patient with the target in the thoracic spine (in the LL direction). Combining those numbers (mean transversal VE for both locations and maximum CC error of 3 mm), the mean three-dimensional vectorial patient movement and thus the mean overall accuracy can be safely estimated to be < or = 3.6 mm. CONCLUSION: The presented combination of a body cast and head mask system in a rigid stereotactic body frame ensures reliable noninvasive patient fixation for fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy and may enable dose escalation for less radioresponsive tumors that are near the spinal cord or otherwise critically located while minimizing the risk of late sequelae.     

Treatment of Prostate Cancer Local Recurrence After Whole-Gland Cryosurgery With Frameless Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Initial Experience

BackgroundThe use of frameless robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy has not been investigated in patients whose primary cryosurgery treatment failed. The aim of this series was to present initial experiences with frameless robotic radiosurgery in the treatment of local prostate recurrence after cryotherapy.MethodsWe reviewed the outcome of frameless robotic radiosurgery in 4 patients for biopsy-proven local recurrent prostate cancer after cryotherapy. The patients underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York.ResultsThe patients' ages ranged from 66 to 75 years old. The average follow-up was more than 4 months. Presalvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were 7.3, 11.9, 6.1, and 20.9 ng/mL for the four patients. Presalvage Gleason scores were 7, 7, 9, and 8 respectively. One patient had insufficient follow-up for inclusion. The 3 remaining patients showed reduction of PSA levels after SBRT. Follow-up post-SBRT PSA levels were 2.2, 0.19, and 2.0 ng/mL. The average PSA reduction was 7.0 ng/mL. Morbidity at 3-week follow-up included urinary urgency, dysuria, and constipation. There was no change in international prostate symptom score or The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form scores after SBRT. One patient experienced erectile dysfunction from SBRT.ConclusionsInitial results indicate that robotic SBRT is a viable option for patients who have failed initial cryosurgery therapy measures. The patients had minimal morbidity with significant reduction in PSA levels.     

眼内肿瘤X射线放射外科治疗精确度研究

背景与目的：眼内肿瘤X射线放射外科治疗受眼球旋转的限制,常规定位方法误差极大。本研究探讨用微真空角膜接触眼球固定器固定眼球进行放射外科治疗的精确度。方法：人体头颅模型内特定标记物测定CT定位的精确度;应用我院研制的微真空角膜接触眼球固定器固定眼球,进行眼内肿瘤CT扫描和验证扫描,测定眼球固定精确度和靶区定位精确度。结果：CT平均定位误差为0．65mm,最大误差为1．09mm。利用微真空角膜接触眼球固定器固定眼球,精确度为0．84mm,最大误差为1．17mm。眼内肿瘤定位精确度为0．87mm,最大误差为1．19mm。SRS 200治疗的摆位误差为0．22mm,最大误差为0．32mm。总治疗误差为1．40mm,95％置信概率为2．12mm。结论：利用微真空角膜接触眼球固定器进行眼内肿瘤放射外科治疗精确度高,可减少放射外科治疗时眼球旋转所产生的误差。     

头颈肿瘤立体定向分次照射靶区定位的误差分析

背景与目的:明确靶区定位的精确度是立体定向分次照射质量保证的基本要求。本文主要分析头颈肿瘤立体定向分次照射(fractionatedstereotacticradiotherapy,FSRT)中机械等中心、CT定位、治疗摆位以及CT图像误差等可能引起的靶区定位误差。方法:使用立体定向治疗计划系统、靶点模拟器、头部定位框架检查各个治疗阶段靶区定位的误差。设置任意5个参考点,使用靶点模拟器检查CT定位误差;选取7个不同机器臂架/治疗床角度,定期用胶片检验使用的PhilipsSL-18直线加速器等中心误差大小;用验证片检查治疗摆位误差;对自制模体行CT扫描,分析CT图像伪影可能引起的图像误差。结果:CT定位误差约为(1.5±0.4)mm;在检查的不同机器臂架/治疗床角度中机械等中心最大误差为(1.0±0.6)mm;患者摆位的距离误差为(1.0±0.3)mm;整个治疗过程中靶区定位误差约为(2.1±0.8)mm。结论:立体定向分次照射中需要综合考虑各个阶段中可能对治疗靶区定位产生的影响,误差分析结果可用来确定治疗的计划靶区。