Atorvastatin and quinapril inhibit blood coagulation in patients with coronary artery disease following 28 days of therapy

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the antithrombotic effects of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) drugs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood coagulation at the site of microvascular injury was assessed in 26 males with CAD before and after treatment with quinapril (10 mg day-1; n=13) or atorvastatin (40 mg day-1; n=13) for 4 weeks and an additional 4 weeks of combined therapy (quinapril+atorvastatin). Rates of prothrombin and factor V activation (FVa), fibrinogen (Fbg) cleavage and FVa inactivation showed that both quinapril and atorvastatin decreased the rates of: formation of thrombin B-chain (by 30.6%, P=0.007; and by 34.3%, P=0.003), formation of thrombin-antithrombin complexes (by 30.4%, P=0.0002; and by 40%, P=0.001), FV activation (by 19.1%, P=0.03; and by 21.8%, P=0.005) and Fbg depletion (by 29.2%, P=0.004; and by 32.7%, P=0.001). Atorvastatin alone accelerated FVa inactivation (P=0.005). A further 4 weeks of combined therapy enhanced most anticoagulant effects only when atorvastatin was added to quinapril. CONCLUSIONS: In CAD patients, atorvastatin and quinapril slowed blood clotting at the site of microvascular injury after 28 days of therapy. Addition of atorvastatin to quinapril, but not quinapril to the statin, enhanced the anticoagulant effects. Our findings might help explain the reduced risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in patients treated with statins and/or ACEIs and the lack of clinical benefits from ACEI added to prior statin therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk.     

Contribution of apo CIII reduction to the greater effect of 12-week micronized fenofibrate than atorvastatin therapy on triglyceride levels and LDL size in dyslipidemic patients

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein (apo) CIII plays an important role in the catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as it is a potent inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). A low LPL activity has been simultaneously associated with hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol and with small LDL particles. AIM: To compare the effects of a 12-week treatment with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg) versus atorvastatin (10 mg) on apo CIII and lipoprotein-lipid levels including LDL size. METHOD: After a 4-week washout period, dyslipidemic patients were randomized to either micronized fenofibrate (n = 64) or atorvastatin (n = 72). RESULTS: Both fenofibrate and atorvastatin significantly decreased apo CIII levels by -0.03 +/- 0.03 versus -0.01 +/- 0.03 g/l respectively, and increased LDL size by 4.9 +/- 3.3 versus 1.8 +/- 2.9 A. Improvements in these parameters were significantly greater with fenofibrate (P < 0.0001). Significant relationships were found between changes in triglycerides and changes in apo CIII (r = 0.81 and r = 0.59, P < 0.0001) as well as between changes in LDL size and changes in apo CIII (r = -0.41 and r = -0.45, P < 0.001), in both fenofibrate and atorvastatin groups. respectively. CONCLUSION: The substantial reduction in apo CIII induced by micronized fenofibrate plays an important role in the greater effect of micronized fenofibrate than atorvastatin on plasma triglycerides and LDL size.     

9种调血脂药物有效性及安全性评价

目的评估<国家基本药物目录>(2000年版)中9种调血脂药物的疗效及安全性,为2002年国家基本药物目录的遴选与调整提供证据.方法采用卫生技术评估的方法,全面检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献光盘数据库和中文科技期刊全文数据库,检索时间截至2002年8月;同时检索中国药物不良反应检测中心和WHO乌普沙拉检测中心数据库.以药物的调脂作用、冠心病的预防作用以及毒副作用为评价指标纳入相关文献,科学、客观、真实的评价纳入文献并进行分析、比较,为每个品种的评价和品种间的相互比较提供依据.结果相互比较药物调脂作用的研究结果显示,他汀类药物的等效剂量(LDL-C降低25%)为:阿托伐他汀10 mg/d,辛伐他汀20 mg/d,普伐他汀40 mg/d,洛伐他汀40 mg/d,西立伐他汀0.3 mg/d,氟伐他汀80 mg/d;现有证据尚不能对吉非贝齐与非诺贝特比较,阿西莫司与他汀或贝特比较做出判断.调脂药物对冠心病一、二级预防的研究结果显示,普伐他汀和洛伐他汀对冠心病一级预防有效,长期应用能减少用药者心血管疾病的发生率;吉非贝齐一级预防虽降低心血管的死亡率,但不降低总死亡率;二级预防的研究中被证明有效的药物是:普伐他汀、辛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀、氟伐他汀、吉非贝齐和非诺贝特.多项大型临床试验及英、美等国政府不良反应监测中心的数据均提示他汀类药物的安全性与耐受性较好,不良反应发生率较低.横纹肌溶解作为他汀类药物罕见的严重不良反应,属于一种偶发性疾病.综合现有数据,横纹肌溶解发生率西立伐他汀最高,普伐他汀与氟伐他汀较低,辛伐他汀、洛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀介于两者之间.世界范围内非诺贝特的不良反应事件报道明显少于吉非贝齐.结论依据现有结果,9种调血脂药物中疗效确切、安全、证据质量高、应用广泛的有普伐他汀、辛伐他汀、洛伐他汀.现有证据表明,疗效较好、较安全,但尚需更多证据支持的有阿托伐他汀、氟伐他汀、非诺贝特;安全性不如同类药物或研究证据太少的是西立伐他汀、吉非贝齐、阿西莫司.     

Efficacy and tolerability of atorvastatin/fenofibrate fixed-dose combination tablet compared with atorvastatin and fenofibrate monotherapies in patients with dyslipidemia: A 12-week,multicenter, double-blind,randomized, parallel-group study

Background: Coadministration of statin and fenofibrate monotherapies is frequently used to treat patients with dyslipidemia; however, a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet is not currently marketed.Objective: This study evaluates a new FDC tablet of atorvastatin 40 mg and fenofibrate 100 mg.Methods: This was a 12-week, multicenter, doubleblind, randomized, parallel-group Phase IIb study. Adults with dyslipidemia (non?HDL-C >130 mg/dL and triglycerides [TG] ≥150 but ≤500 mg/dL) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive the FDC, atorvastatin 40 mg, or fenofibrate 145 mg for 12 weeks. Study medication was taken once daily in the evening, without regard to meals. Patients attended follow-up visits after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of the double-blind treatment. The primary efficacy end points were the mean percentage changes from baseline to the final visit (week 12) in non?HDL-C, HDL-C, and TG. Secondary variables were LDL-C, VLDL-C particle concentration, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, creatinine, myeloperoxidase, and lipoproteinassociated phospholipase A2. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, physical examinations, and ECGs.Results: Patients (n = 220) were aged 26 to 87 years; 115 (52.3%) were men and 105 (47.7%) were women; 189 (85.9%) were white, 17 (7.7%) were black, and 15 (6.8%) were Hispanic or Latino; and mean (SD) weight was 200.5 (40.85) lb (range, 103.5–367.4 lb). Previous treatments were statins (25.9% [57/220]), fibrates (1.8% [4/220]), and dietary supplements (25.5% [56/220]); 57.7% (127/220) of patients were treatment naive. Use of the FDC was associated with an improvement in non?HDL-C (?44.8%) that was significantly greater than with fenofibrate monotherapy (?16.1%; P < 0.001) but was not significantly different from that with atorvastatin monotherapy (?40.2%; P = NS). HDL-C increased significantly more in the FDC group (19.7%) than with atorvastatin (6.5%; P < 0.001) but was not significantly different from fenofibrate (18.2%; P = NS). TG lowering in the FDC group (?49.1%) was significantly greater than with both atorvastatin (?28.9%; P < 0.001) and fenofibrate (?27.8%; P = 0.001). LDL-C lowering in the FDC group (?42.3%) was significantly greater than with fenofibrate (?13.9%; P < 0.001) but not significantly different from atorvastatin (?43.1%; P = NS). The FDC had either comparable or significantly greater improvements in other lipid variables and multiple secondary variables. The FDC was generally well tolerated; the tolerability profile was consistent with those of atorvastatin and fenofibrate monotherapies. Treatment-emergent adverse events (ie, those occurring after the first dose of study medication) were recorded in 43 of 73 patients (58.9%) for the FDC, 49 of 74 (66.2%) for atorvastatin, and 48 of 73 (65.8%) for fenofibrate.Conclusions: In this 12-week study, patients with dyslipidemia treated with the 40/100-mg atorvastatin/ fenofibrate FDC had a significantly greater reduction in TG than those treated with atorvastatin 40 mg or higher-dose fenofibrate 145 mg. Treatment with the FDC was also associated with a significantly greater reduction in non?HDL-C compared with fenofibrate alone and a greater increase in HDL-C compared with atorvastatin alone. All treatments were generally well tolerated.     

A 52-week,multicenter, randomized,parallel-group,double-blind,double-dummy study to assess the efficacy of atorvastatin and simvastatin in reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride targets: the treat-to-target (3T) study

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease call for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction as the primary target of treatment and reduction of triglycerides (TG) as an additional target. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of atorvastatin and simvastatin to reduce LDL-C and TG concentrations and to meet 3 target lipid levels: LDL-C or=4.0 mmol/L (>or=155 mg/dL), were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin or 20 mg simvastatin. Fasting (12-hour) blood samples for the estimation of lipid levels and clinical laboratory values were collected after 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The dose was doubled after 12 weeks if the target National Cholesterol Education Program level of LDL-C (相似文献   

Aspirin acetylates fibrinogen and enhances fibrinolysis. Fibrinolytic effect is independent of changes in plasminogen activator levels

In addition to its antiplatelet effect, aspirin has been reported to have fibrinolytic and hypoprothrombinemic effects. The objective of this study was to investigate possible mechanisms underlying the enhanced fibrinolysis after aspirin. Five healthy subjects received 650 mg of aspirin every 12 hr for 5 days. Blood samples were collected before aspirin (control), and immediately before (0 hr) and 2 hr after (2 hr) the last dose for determinations of clot lysis time, time course of thrombin-induced fibrin aggregation, tissue plasminogen activator activity, intrinsic pathway fibrinolytic activity, plasminogen, fibrinogen, aspirin and salicylic acid, and the coagulation tests activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and prothrombin time. Clot lysis time was shorter after aspirin, control: 9.1 +/- 12.4 min (mean +/- S.D.); 0 hr: 4.6 +/- 4.0 min; 2 hr: 5.7 +/- 6.2 min (P: .04) and the fibrin aggregation curves showed increased relative absorbance at 10 min, control: 8.4 +/- 2.2; 0 hr: 11.2 +/- 0.2; 2 hr: 13.3 +/- 5.4 (P: .02). Control values of tissue plasminogen activator (0.11 +/- 0.04 IU/ml), intrinsic pathway fibrinolytic activity (2.20 +/- 0.54 IU/ml), plasminogen (10.9 +/- 1.0 mg/dl), fibrinogen (288 +/- 37 mg/dl) and the coagulation tests were not different from those after aspirin. Aspirin concentration was below detection limits at 0 hr and 1.63 +/- 0.97 micrograms/ml at 2 hr, whereas salicylic acid concentration was 55.0 +/- 35.8 and 136 +/- 71.9 micrograms/ml at 0 and 2 hr, respectively. In vitro studies using fibrinogen-free plasma and added acetylated fibrinogen showed an inverse relationship between the extent of acetylation and clot lysis time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Atorvastatin and micronized fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes with combined hyperlipidemia

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of a atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination on lipid profile, in comparison to each drug alone, in patients with type 2 diabetes and combined hyperlipidemia (CHL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients, who were free of coronary artery disease (CAD) at entry, were studied for a period of 24 weeks. These patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin (20 mg/day, n = 40), micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day, n = 40), or a combination of both (atorvastatin 20 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 mg/day, n = 40). The effect of treatment on LDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I and B, lipoprotein(a), and plasma fibrinogen (PF) was recorded. Moreover, the percentage of patients that reached the American Diabetes Association treatment goals and the estimated CAD risk status were calculated. RESULTS: No patient was withdrawn from the study because of side effects. The atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination reduced total cholesterol by 37%, LDL cholesterol by 46%, TGs by 50%, and PF by 20%, whereas it increased HDL cholesterol by 22% (P < 0.0001 for all). These changes were significantly better than those of both monotherapies. Of the patients on drug combination, 97.5% reached the LDL cholesterol treatment goal of <100 mg/dl, 100% reached the desirable TG levels of <200 mg/dl, and 60% reached the optimal HDL cholesterol levels of >45 mg/dl. These rates were significantly higher than those of both monotherapies. Combined treatment reduced the 10-year probability for myocardial infarction from 21.6 to 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination has a highly beneficial effect on all lipid parameters and PF in patients with type 2 diabetes and CHL. It improved patients' CAD risk status significantly more than each drug alone.     

Effects of low doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin 40 to 80 mg/d has been found to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels significantly more than atorvastatin at equipotent doses (ie, 20-80 mg/d). Data on the effects of lower doses of the 2 drugs on HDL-C levels are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of simvastatin 20 mg/d and atorvastatin 10 mg/d on HDL-C levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol [TC] >250 mg/dL) who were not taking any lipid-lowering agents and who were following a low-fat diet were randomized to receive 1 of 2 treatments: simvastatin 20 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Serum TC, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL-C levels were measured using standard methods after 2 months of therapy. In a secondary analysis, lipids and lipoprotein cholesterol were measured after 1 year in patients who continued treatment. RESULTS: Of the 240 patients enrolled (108 men and 132 women; age range, 23-77 years, mean [SEM] 56.7 [0.69]), 235 completed the study. After 2 months of therapy, TC, LDL-C, and serum TG levels decreased significantly versus baseline in both groups (P < 0.001), with no significant differences between treatment groups. HDL-C levels increased by 9.0% (P < 0.001 vs baseline) in the simvastatin group and by 4.3% (P < 0.02) in the atorvastatin group. The difference between the 2 groups in the percentage increase in HDL-C was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In 113 patients who continued treatment, HDL-C levels at 1 year were still significantly higher than baseline levels in the simvastatin group (6.3%, P = 0.034), but not in the atorvastatin group (2.8%, P = 0.587). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest that the HDL-C-increasing effect of simvastatin 20 mg is significantly greater than that of atorvastatin 10 mg. Since increasing HDL-C levels is thought to lower the risk for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, these results warrant further investigation.     

An open-label, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of Insoluble Drug Delivery-MicroParticle fenofibrate in combination with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and extended-release niacin in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Fenofibrate has been prescribed concomitantly with other lipid-lowering agents as a treatment for dyslipidemia. However, combination therapy, particularly a statin-fibrate combination, may be associated with an increased risk of myopathy, although this risk appears to be less with fenofibrate than with other fibrates. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of administering a single dose of atorvastatin, simvastatin, or extended-release (ER) niacin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single dose of fenofibrate Insoluble Drug Delivery-MicroParticle (IDD-P). METHODS: This was an open-label, single-center,randomized, 4-treatment, 4-period crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences, administered 1 week apart, that included all 4 of the following treatments: 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet alone; 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 atorvastatin 10-mg tablet; 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 simvastatin 10-mg tablet; and 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 ER niacin 500-mg tablet. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained immediately before and up to 72 hours after administration during each of the 4 treatment periods. If the 90% CI for the log-transformed parameter was between 0.80 and 1.25, and the 90% CI for the nontransformed parameter was between 0.80 and 1.20, then the absence of a clinically significant drug interaction was assumed. However, the absence of a drug interaction was not to be ruled out if one or more of the CIs exceeded the boundary, provided the CI included 1.00. RESULTS: Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled.Sixteen (80%) of the subjects were male and 17 (85%) were black; mean (SD) age was 35 (9.3) years. The mean C(max), AUC from the time of administration to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)), and AUC from the time of administration to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) were 5%, 6%, and 2% lower, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus atorvastatin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone; the mean C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 6% lower, and 10% and 9% higher, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus simvastatin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone; and the mean C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 12%, 6%, and 5% lower, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus ER niacin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone. The 90% CIs surrounding the mean ratios for AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(0-infinity) for all 3 comparisons were between 0.80 and 1.25, suggesting the absence of a drug interaction for these parameters. For C(max), an absence of a drug interaction was observed between concomitantly administered IDD-P fenofibrate and both atorvastatin and simvastatin; absence of drug interaction was not found for IDD-P fenofibrate plus ER niacin. All treatments were well tolerated; headache was the most common adverse event (AE) (10%). One subject with creatinine kinase levels of 1300 IU/L (>6 times the upper limit of normal) at baseline experienced a seizure approximately 12 to approximately 13 hours after administration of IDD-P fenofibrate plus atorvastatin; this serious AE was deemed to be possibly related to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of a single dose of either atorvastatin or simvastatin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of IDD-P fenofibrate. A drug interaction between concomitantly administered single doses of IDD-P fenofibrate and ER niacin could not be ruled out.     

Efficacy and tolerability of a "suprabioavailable" formulation of fenofibrate in patients with dyslipidemia: a pooled analysis of two open-label trials

BACKGROUND: Newer fibrates such as micronized fenofibrate lower triglyceride (TG) levels, raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, and lower fibrinogen levels, in addition to markedly lowering levels of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). A new microcoated "suprabioavailable" formulation of fenofibrate has demonstrated a superior pharmacokinetic profile compared with micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/d and may effectively reduce cardiovascular risk factors at the lower dose of 160 mg/d. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the suprabioavailable" formulation of fenofibrate in patients with type IIa, type IIb, or type IV dyslipidemia. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of data from 2 unpublished multicenter, open-label trials with a common protocol. After a 4-week washout period, patients with dyslipidemias not corrected by diet alone were assigned to receive microcoated fenofibrate 160 mg/d for 12 weeks. Changes in lipid profiles and safety variables (vital signs, body weight, and laboratory measures) were monitored throughout the study, and adverse events occurring between visits 1 and 5 were recorded by the study investigators. RESULTS: The 2 trials included 375 men and women (mean age, 55.2 years) with type IIa (n = 158), type IIb (n = 195), type IV (n = 21), or other (n = 1) dyslipidemias. At end point. HDL-C levels in patients with type IIa, IIb, or IV dyslipidemia were increased by a respective 10.9% (P < 0.001), 16.1% (P < 0.001), and 12.1% (P < 0.05), whereas TG levels were decreased by a respective 27.7% (P < 0.001), 46.4% (P < 0.001), and 40.2% (P < 0.05). In patients with type IIa or IIb dyslipidemia, TC decreased (-14.3% in each group), LDL-C decreased (-20.6% and -13.2%, respectively), and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio decreased (-26.7% and -22.0%) (all, P < 0.001). Overall, 121 of 375 (32.3%) patients experienced > or = adverse event (AE) (202 nonserious, 8 serious). Of these, 10.1% were judged to be possibly drug related. The most common nonserious AEs were those affecting the body as a whole (2.7% of patients) and the digestive system (5.3% of patients). No serious AE was considered drug related. CONCLUSIONS: The new "suprabioavailable" microcoated, micronized formulation of fenofibrate appears to maintain the good efficacy and safety profile of micronized fenofibrate. In the study population with moderate dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb), it promoted beneficial changes in major lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease.     

High-dose statins and skeletal muscle metabolism in humans: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Myopathy, probably caused by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibition in skeletal muscle, rarely occurs in patients taking statins. This study was designed to assess the effect of high-dose statin treatment on cholesterol and ubiquinone metabolism and mitochondrial function in human skeletal muscle. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with hypercholesterolemia (33 men and 15 women) were randomly assigned to receive 80 mg/d of simvastatin (n = 16), 40 mg/d of atorvastatin (n = 16), or placebo (n = 16) for 8 weeks. Plasma samples and muscle biopsy specimens were obtained at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. RESULTS: The ratio of plasma lathosterol to cholesterol, a marker of endogenous cholesterol synthesis, decreased significantly by 66% in both statin groups. Muscle campesterol concentrations increased from 21.1 +/- 7.1 nmol/g to 41.2 +/- 27.0 nmol/g in the simvastatin group and from 22.6 +/- 8.6 nmol/g to 40.0 +/- 18.7 nmol/g in the atorvastatin group (P = .005, repeated-measurements ANOVA). The muscle ubiquinone concentration was reduced significantly from 39.7 +/- 13.6 nmol/g to 26.4 +/- 7.9 nmol/g (P = .031, repeated-measurements ANOVA) in the simvastatin group, but no reduction was observed in the atorvastatin or placebo group. Respiratory chain enzyme activities were assessed in 6 patients taking simvastatin with markedly reduced muscle ubiquinone and in matched subjects selected from the atorvastatin (n = 6) and placebo (n = 6) groups. Respiratory chain enzyme and citrate synthase activities were reduced in the patients taking simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose statin treatment leads to changes in the skeletal muscle sterol metabolism. Furthermore, aggressive statin treatment may affect mitochondrial volume.     

Effects of atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 200 mg on the low-density lipoprotein profile in dyslipidemic patients: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

Background: Elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are highly atherogenic, especially the small, dense LDL (sdLDL) species. Fenofibrate has been reported to shift the LDL profile by decreasing the sdLDL subfraction and increasing larger LDL subclasses. Atorvastatin, anantihyperlipidemic agent, has been reported to reduce plasma total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations and thus could modify the LDL profile.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fenofi brate and atorvastatin on standard lipid concentrations and the LDL profile.Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, men and women aged 18 to 79 years with type II primary dyslipidemia, defined as LDL-C ≥160 and TG 150 to 400 mg/dL, after a 4- to 6-week washout period while eating an appropriate diet, were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily or fenofi-brate 200 mg once daily. Plasma lipid concentrations and cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) B (reflecting the LDL particle number) in each LDL subfraction prepared by ultracentrifiigation were determined at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed using adverse events (AEs) obtained on laboratory analysis and vital sign measurement. Adherence was assessed by counting unused drug supplies.Results: A total of 165 patients (117 men, 48 women; mean [SD] age, 50.1 [10.7] years; mean TC concentration, 289 mg/dL) were randomized to receive atorvastatin (n = 81) or fenofibrate (n = 84). Compared with fenofibrate, atorvastatin was associated with a significantly greater mean (SD) percentage decrease in TC (27.0% [12.3%] vs 16.5% [12.9%]; P < 0.001), calculated LDL-C (35.4% [15.8%] vs 17.3% [17.2%]; P < 0.001), TC/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (29.1% [16.3%] vs 22.9% [15.9%]; P = 0.001), and apoB (30.3% [12.7%] vs 19.6% [15.5%]; P < 0.001). Compared with atorvastatin, fenofibrate was associated with a significantly greater decrease in TG (37.2% [25.9%] vs 20.2% [27.3%]; P < 0.001) and a significantly greater increase in HDL-C concentration (10.4% [15.7%] vs 4.6% [12.1%]; P = 0.017). Fibrinogen concentration was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.002); it was decreased with fenofibrate use (4.6% [23.7%]) and was increased with atorvastatin use (5.7% [23.5%]). Atorvastatin did not markedly affect the LDL distribution; it was associated with a homogeneous decrease in cholesterol and apoB concentrations in all subfractions, whereas fenofibrate was associated with a marked movement toward a normalized LDL profile, shifting the sdLDL subfractions toward larger and less atherogenic particles, particularly in those patients with baseline TG ≥200 mg/dL. No serious AEs related to the study treatments were reported. A total of 5 AEs were observed in 8 patients, including: abdominal pain, 3 patients (2 in the atorvastatin group and 1 in the fenofibrate group); abnormal liver function test results, 1 (fenofibrate); increased creatine Phosphokinase activity, 2 (atorvastatin); gastrointestinal disorders, 1 (fenofibrate); and vertigo, 1 (fenofibrate).Conclusion: In these dyslipidemic patients, fenofibrate treatment was associated with an improved LDL subfraction profile beyond reduction in LDL-C, particularly in patients with elevated TG concentration, whereas atorvastatin was associated with equally reduced concentrations of cholesterol and apoB in all LDL subfractions independent of TG concentrations.     

Combination therapy with fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, and simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on experimental traumatic brain injury

We and others have demonstrated that fibrates [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha agonists] and statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) exerted neuroprotective and pleiotropic effects in experimental models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Because the combination of statins and fibrates synergistically enhanced PPARalpha activation, we hypothesized that the combination of both drugs may exert more important and/or prolonged beneficial effects in TBI than each alone. In this study, we examined the combination of fenofibrate with simvastatin, administered 1 and 6 h after injury, on the consequences of TBI. First, our dose-effect study demonstrated that the most efficient dose of simvastatin (37.5 mg/kg) reduced post-traumatic neurological deficits and brain edema. Then, the effects of the combination of fenofibrate (50 mg/kg) and simvastatin (37.5 mg/kg), given p.o. at 1 and 6 h after TBI, were evaluated on the TBI consequences in the early and late phase after injury. The combination exerted more sustained neurological recovery-promoting and antiedematous effects than monotherapies, and it synergistically decreased the post-traumatic brain lesion. Furthermore, a delayed treatment given p.o. at 3 and 8 h after TBI with the combination was still efficient on neurological deficits induced by TBI, but it failed to reduce the brain edema at 48 h. The present data represent the first demonstration that the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin exerts prolonged and synergistic neuroprotective effects than each drug alone. Thus, these results may have important therapeutic significance for the treatment of TBI.     

Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia: the VYTAL study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the recommended usual starting and next highest doses of ezetimibe/ simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, multicenter study (June 22 to December 7, 2005) consisted of adult patients randomized to the recommended usual starting (ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d, vs atorvastatin, 10 or 20 mg/d) or next highest (ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/40 mg/d, vs atorvastatin, 40 mg/d) doses. Efficacy end points included percent changes from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (primary) and proportion of patients attaining LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL (secondary). RESULTS: A total of 1229 patients participated in the study. Significantly greater mean reductions were found in LDL-C levels with ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d (-53.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -55.4% to -51.8%), than with atorvastatin, 10 mg/d (-38.3%; 95% CI, -40.1% to -36.5%; P < .001) or 20 mg/d (-44.6%; 95% CI, -46.4% to -42.8%; P < .001), and with ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/40 mg/d (-57.6%; 95% CI, -59.4% to -55.8%), vs atorvastatin, 40 mg/d (-50.9%; 95% CI, -52.7% to -49.1%; P < .001). Ezetimibe/simvastatin was also superior to atorvastatin in attainment of LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL (P < .001 for all dose comparisons). Significantly better improvements with ezetimibe/simvastatin than with atorvastatin (P < or = .001) were observed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Ezetimibe/ simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d, reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and triglyceride levels significantly more than atorvastatin, 10 mg/d (P = .02), with comparable reductions at other doses. Incidences of clinical adverse events, including serious drug-related and prespecified gastrointestinal-, gallbladder-, and hepatitis-related allergic reactions or rash events, and laboratory adverse events, including repeated elevation of hepatic transaminases or creatine kinase levels, were similar for both treatments. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe/simvastatin provided additional lipid-modifying benefits over atorvastatin monotherapy at the recommended usual starting and next highest doses in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.     

The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.     

Quinapril, an ACE inhibitor, reduces markers of oxidative stress in the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Patients with the metabolic syndrome often have abnormal levels of proinflammatory and pro-oxidative mechanisms within their vasculature. We sought to determine whether the ACE inhibitor quinapril regulates markers of oxidative stress in the metabolic syndrome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with the metabolic syndrome were randomized in a double-blind manner to either the ACE inhibitor quinapril (20 mg/day) or matching placebo for 4 weeks. Serum markers of vascular oxidative stress were measured. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of therapy, serum 8-isoprostane was reduced by 12% in the quinapril group when compared with placebo (quinapril, 46.7 +/- 1.0; placebo, 52.7 +/- 0.9 pg/ml; P = 0.001). Erythrocyte superoxide dismutase activity increased 35% in the quinapril group when compared with placebo (quinapril, 826.3 +/- 17.1; placebo, 612.3 +/- 6.9 units/g Hb; P < 0.001). In addition, lag time to oxidation of LDL, a marker of oxidative stress, was increased by 48% in the quinapril group when compared with placebo (quinapril 89.2 +/- 9.2 vs. placebo 60.1 +/- 12.3 min; P < 0.001). Therapy with quinapril was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the ACE inhibitor quinapril reduces markers of vascular oxidative stress and may attenuate the progression of the pathophysiology seen in the metabolic syndrome.     

Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg in the treatment of 26 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia over 12 weeks using an open crossover trial format. Both, similarly, reduced LDL by 47 +/- 13% and 43 +/- 16% and median triglycerides by 22% and 27% respectively. However, atorvastatin reduced HDL by 2 +/- 24% compared with 8 +/- 30% increase with simvastatin (p = 0.05) affecting the LDL:HDL ratio achieved (4.478 +/- 1.56 vs 3.74 +/- 0.93, p = 0.001). Atorvastatin raised median fibrinogen by 15% compared with a non-significant 5% increase with simvastatin (p = 0.05). Simvastatin reduced lipoprotein (a) by a median 20% compared with baseline (p = 0.05) compared with 5% for atorvastatin. Side-effects, mostly gastrointestinal, were seen in four patients (16%) with atorvastatin compared with one case of myalgia with simvastatin (4%). We conclude both drugs are equally effective in LDL reduction but that simvastatin is superior in raising HDL and causes fewer side-effects. These results require confirmation in larger studies.     

Validation of rotation thrombelastography in a model of systemic activation of fibrinolysis and coagulation in humans

BACKGROUND: Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole blood assay to evaluate the viscoelastic properties during blood clot formation and clot lysis. Rotation thrombelastography (e.g. ROTEM) has overcome some of the limitations of classical TEG and is used as a point-of-care device in several clinical settings of coagulation disorders. Endotoxemia leads to systemic activation of the coagulation system and fibrinolysis in humans. OBJECTIVES: We validated whether ROTEM is sensitive to endotoxin induced, tissue factor-triggered coagulation and fibrinolysis and if its measures correlate with biohumoral markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy male volunteers participated in this randomized placebo-controlled trial. Volunteers received either 2 ng kg(-1) National Reference Endotoxin or saline. RESULTS: Endotoxemia significantly shortened ROTEM clotting time (CT) by 36% (CI 0.26-0.46; P < 0.05) with a strong inverse correlation with the peak plasma levels of prothrombin fragments (F(1 + 2)) (r = -0.83, P < 0.05). Additionally, endotoxin infusion enhanced maximal lysis (ML) 3.9-fold (CI: 2.5-5.2) compared with placebo or baseline after 2 h (P < 0.05). Peak ML and peak tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) values correlated excellently (r = 0.82, P < 0.05). ROTEM parameters clot formation time and maximal clot firmness were not affected by LPS infusion, whereas platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) closure times decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Rotation thrombelastography (ROTEM) detects systemic changes of in vivo coagulation activation, and importantly it is a point of care device, which is sensitive to changes in fibrinolysis in humans. The ex vivo measures CT and ML correlate very well with established in vivo markers of coagulation activation (F(1 + 2)) and fibrinolysis (t-PA), respectively.     

Atorvastatin or fenofibrate on post-prandial lipaemia in type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidaemia

BACKGROUND: Post-prandial lipid abnormalities might contribute to the excess of cardiovascular risk typical of type 2 diabetic patients. The study evaluated the effects of atorvastatin (20 mg d(-1)) vs. fenofibrate (200 mg d(-1)) on post-prandial lipids in type 2 diabetic patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Eight type 2 diabetic patients, male/female (M/F) 6/2, age 58 +/- 5 years, body mass index (BMI) 28 +/- 3 kg m(-2) with cholesterol of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) between 100-160 mg dL(-1) and triglycerides between 150-400 mg dL(-1), participated in a randomized, cross-over study (3 months on atorvastatin and 3 months on fenofibrate). At baseline and at the end of the two treatments, the patients were given a standard fat meal; blood samples were taken before the meal and every 2 h after for the assay of cholesterol, triglycerides, apoB-48 and apoB-100 (determined by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) in plasma lipoproteins and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfractions (large and small VLDL), separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. RESULTS: Data on fasting lipids confirmed that atorvastatin was more effective on the reduction of LDL-cholesterol, whereas fenofibrate was a better triglyceride-lowering agent. Concerning the post-prandial phase, the incremental areas under the curve (IAUC) for chylomicrons and large VLDL were reduced after both treatments, reaching statistical significance for cholesterol, triglyceride and apoB-100 content of chylomicrons only after fenofibrate administration [IAUC, (5.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 10.7 +/- 9.3) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.03; (131.3 +/- 95.1 vs. 259.1 +/- 201.5) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.02; (0.46 +/- 1 vs. 3 +/- 3.7) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.025, all respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: During the post-prandial state fenofibrate appeared to be more effective than atorvastatin in reducing the chylomicron response.     

Effects of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoproteins, and lipid ratios in patients with hypercholesterolemia: additional results from the STELLAR trial

BACKGROUND: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein (apo) B, and lipid and apolipoprotein ratios that include both atherogenic and antiatherogenic lipid components have been found to be strong predictors of coronary heart disease risk. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine prospectively the effects of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across dose ranges on non-HDL-C, apo B, apo A-I, and total cholesterol (TC):HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C):HDL-C, non-HDL-C:HDL-C, and apo B:apo A-I ratios in patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > or =160 mg/dL and <250 mg/dL and triglycerides <400 mg/dL) in the Statin Therapies for Elevated Lipid Levels compared Across doses to Rosuvastatin (STELLAR) trial. METHODS: In this randomized, Multicenter, parallel-group, open-label trial (4522IL/0065), patients > or =18 years of age received rosuvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg for 6 weeks. Pairwise comparisons were prospectively planned and performed between rosuvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg and milligram-equivalent or higher doses of comparators. RESULTS: A total of 2268 patients were randomized to the rosuvastatin 10- to 40-mg, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin groups. Fifty-one percent of patients were women, the mean (SD) age was 57 (12) years, and 19% had a documented history of atherosclerotic disease. Over 6 weeks, rosuvastatin significantly reduced non-HDL-C, apo B, and all lipid and apolipoprotein ratios assessed, compared with milligram-equivalent doses of atorvastatin and milligram-equivalent or higher doses of simvastatin and pravastatin (all, P < 0.002). Rosuvastatin reduced non-HDL-C by 42.0% to 50.9% compared with 34.4% to 48.1% with atorvastatin, 26.0% to 41.8% with simvastatin, and 18.6% to 27.4% with pravastatin. Rosuvastatin reduced apo B by 36.7% to 45.3% compared with 29.4% to 42.9% with atorvastatin, 22.2% to 34.7% with simvastatin, and 14.7% to 23.0% with pravastatin. The highest increase in apo A-I (8.8%) was observed in the rosuvastatin 20-mg group, and this increase was significantly greater than in the atorvastatin 40-mg and 80-mg groups (both, P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg was more efficacious in improving the lipid profile of patients with hypercholesterolemia than milligram-equivalent doses of atorvastatin and milligram-equivalent or higher doses of simvastatin and pravastatin.