Antibody responses to hepatitis C virus and its modes of transmission in dialysis patients.

Five of 72 patients dialysed at the same dialysis unit developed elevated alanine aminotranspherase (ALT) levels attributed to acute non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). Histopathologic findings consistent with NANBH were present in four of them. Serological screening for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was performed in all 72 cases. Three of the patients with NANBH and 2 of the other 67 patients had positive tests. Low and transient levels of anti-HCV were noted in 2 patients with NANBH in spite of chronic hepatitis. Only 1 of 5 patients with NANBH was known to have had blood transfusions indicating other, as yet undefined, modes of transmission of HCV for the others. Although antibody responses to HCV might be transient or low, testing for anti-HCV should be considered in dialysis populations.     

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Dialysis: A Continuing Problem

Patients on chronic dialysis are at increased risk of acquiring parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses from blood product transfusions or nosocomial transmission in hemodialysis units, and biochemical abnormalities in liver function are seen in 10–44% of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis in dialysis patients, and the remaining cases were attributed to non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has shed light on the cause and clinical course of NANBH in patients on dialysis. The current debate is focused on strategies to reduce the transmission of HCV among dialysis patients and to lessen the consequences of liver disease among patients already infected.     

维持性血液透析患者感染乙型和丙型肝炎的分析

目的为了评价血液透析（血透）患者乙型和丙型肝炎（HBV、HCV）感染状态及对临床情况和肝功能的影响。方法对62例血透患者应用ELISA法和RT-PCR法检测抗-HCV和HCVRNA，采用斑点杂交法和固相放免法检测HBV标志，并检测肝功能和血浆蛋白电泳。结果62例患者中，抗-HCVIgM阳性27例（43．6％），抗-HCVIgG阳性29例（46．8％），HCVRNA阳性34例（54．8％），三项任一项阳性37例（59．7％），5例（8．1％）HBsAg阳性，其中HBeAg和HBVDNA阳性3例。结论向透患者中HCV感染严重，临床情况及预后差，检测血浆蛋白和电泳较肝功能酶学能更好地作为肝炎诊断和反映病情的指标。     

Outbreak of hemodialysis-associated non-A, non-B hepatitis and correlation with antibody to hepatitis C virus.

Between January 1987 and October 1988, 35 (45%) of 77 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at one unit developed serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations suggestive of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). Patients were grouped by level of ALT elevation and presence of other etiologies for liver injury. All dialysis patients and staff were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by enzyme immunoassay on three occasions, 9 months apart; anti-HCV repeatedly reactive specimens were tested by the HCV neutralization assay. Household and sexual contacts of patients were tested once for anti-HCV. Case-patients were classified on the basis of clinical case definitions as probable, possible, questionable, and noncases, and by anti-HCV testing. Case-patients who had no history of transfusions or parenteral drug use were compared with noncases for common exposures. A total of 35% (27/77) of patients and none (0/24) of staff were anti-HCV-positive. Anti-HCV was found in 82% of probable cases, compared with 44% of possible cases, 44% of questionable cases, and 12% of noncases (P less than 0.01). Neither a common source nor direct person-to-person transmission could be documented; however, inadequate infection control measures demonstrated by lack of glove use and poor handwashing occurred during the exposure period. The incidence of HCV infection in patients over an 18-month period was 5%. Transmission of HCV to household or sexual contacts of patients did not appear to occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Impact of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infections on Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

ObjectiveThe impacts of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections on patient and renal graft survivals are controversial. This study sought to evaluate the effects of pretransplantation HCV and HBV infections on renal transplant patients and their grafts at our center.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively examined 1224 renal transplantations performed between 1992 and 2006, including 28 HBsAg positive; 64, anti-HCV; 9, anti-HCV plus HBsAg positive; and 1123, negative for anti-HCV and HBsAg. The mean posttransplantation follow-up was 5.6 ± 4.1 years.ResultsThe prevalences of HBV infection were 6.2% in 1994 and 2.3% in 2006 and those of HCV infection were 6.8% in 1998 and 5.2% in 2006. The rejection rate was higher among HBV+ (46.4%) and HCV+ (40.6%) groups than the negative groups (31.5%), but it was not significant. There were no significant differences in patient and graft survivals among the groups. The major cause of patient death was liver failure among patients with concomitant HBV+ and HCV+ infections and cardiovascular disease among HCV+ and negative patients.ConclusionsThere has been a decrease in the prevalence of recipients with hepatitis virus infections over the last 15 years. Patient and graft survivals were not affected by HCV or HBV infection.     

肝细胞肝癌与乙、丙及庚型肝炎病毒感染相关的组织学证据

目的探讨肝细胞肝癌（HCC）与乙、丙及庚型肝炎病毒（HBV，HCV，HGV）感染的相关性。方法采用免疫组化方法检测HCC患者癌及癌旁肝组织中HBV，HCV及HGV表达状况。结果65例HCC患者中，共计52例（80．0％）检出以上三种肝炎病毒抗原，其中乙型肝炎表面抗原（HBsAg），HCVNSS和HGVNSS抗原阳性者分别为47（72．3％），30（46．2％）和10（15．4％）例。52例病毒标志阳性者中，HBV，HCV和HGV三重感染者5例，HBV／HCV，HBV／HGV或HCV／HGV二重感染者各25例，单纯HBV和HCV阳性者各18例和4例，无单纯HGV阳性者。各病毒主要在癌旁组织中表达，但HBV和HCV在癌组织中也较活跃。此外，间或可在肿瘤与正常组织移行处检出HBV或HCV表达，但未见HGV抗原阳性。混合感染、单独感染及病毒标志阴性的HCC比较，肿瘤分化程度无明显区别。结论我国HCC患者肝炎病毒混合感染普遍存在；除HBV和HCV外，HGV感染也可能与肝癌发生有一定关系。     

Environmental Transmission of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Viruses Within the Hemodialysis Unit

Abstract: The hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted in the dialysis setting through blood transfusions and environmental surfaces. Transfusion related hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very well known, but only recently the environmental transmission of this virus was postulated. In order to study the prevalence, mechanisms of transmission, and the ALT patterns of HBV and HCV infections in hemodialysis and CAPD patients before the implementation of HBV vaccination and HCV screening in the blood bank, we conducted a study from January 1987 to January 1990. Sera from 185 hemodialysis and 124 CAPD patients were stored in this period and later analyzed for HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HCV (second generation ELISA). The prevalence of any HBV marker was 55.7% (103/185) for hemodialysis patients and 31.5% (39/124) for CAPD patients (hemodialysis vs. CAPD, p < 0.001). The prevalence of positive anti-HCV was 35.1% (65/185) for hemodialysis and 33.9% (42/124) for CAPD patients (not significant). There was a significant association between HBV markers positivity and anti-HCV positivity. The multivariate analysis of risk factors revealed an association of the positivity of each virus with the duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT), number of previous blood transfusions, and past history of hemodialysis treatment. Thus, besides the transfusion-related transmission, hemodialysis environmental transmission may also occur for both viruses. The findings of a high prevalence of both viruses and evidence for environmental transmission in the dialysis setting are of major importance for the planning of future preventive measures.     

Hepatitis C virus antibody response in acute and chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis.

Patients with post-transfusion, community-acquired or hemodialysis-acquired non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) during acute-phase and resolving or chronicized illness. HCV appears to be involved in most cases of post-transfusion and hemodialysis-acquired NANBH, but only in 40% of community-acquired NANBH. Second generation HCV antibody assays are more specific and sensitive, favoring early detection of HCV seroconversion and identification of HCV-antibody-positive individuals years after exposure to the virus.     

Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Infections in Turkish Hemodialysis Patients

Background and Objective. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Materials and Methods. One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49±29 [16–80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98±66 [12–228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction. Results. Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B. Conclusions. Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in simultaneously hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus RNA positive recipients: the deleterious effect of donor hepatitis B core antibody positivity

Background

Recent data from Italian studies have shown excellent results of liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)—positive donors, whereas such grafts in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients have displayed poorer outcomes. We investigated the results of LT with HBcAb-positive grafts in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfections.

Methods

From August 1999 to December 2009, we performed 27 adult primary LTs from deceased heart-beating donors into recipients showing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and HCV-RNA-positivity simultaneously: 12 patients received a graft from an HBsAg-negative HBcAb-positive donor (core+D group) and 15 from an HBcAb-negative donor (core−D group). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite and steroids which were suspended at 6 months. Anti-HBV prophylaxis was always perfomed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding variables of donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, LT procedure, and acute rejection treatment. Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 67 months (range, 16-141). Among all patients, HCV-RNA remained positive after LT. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in the 2 groups: 83% core+D vs 73% core−D. No recurrent HBV hepatitis occurred during the follow-up. Graft survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the core+D group (core+D 48% vs core−D 87%; P = .018), in which a significantly higher prevalence of graft loss was caused by HCV recurrence (core+D 5/12, 42% vs core−D 1/15, 7%; P = .03). All of the 5 core+D patients who lost their grafts due to HCV recurrence did not receive anti-HCV therapy (4 owing to an aggressive disease and 1 because of patient refusal).

Conclusions

Outcomes of LT in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfection are adversely affected by donor HBcAb positivity, an effect that is mainly mediated by the dismal course of HCV recurrence after LT.     

Antibodies against hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients in the central Italian region of Umbria: evaluation of some risk factors.

The epidemiology of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) is still incomplete. To define the prevalence of antibodies against the main causative agent of NANBH, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the role of some risk factors, we tested sera from 269 patients on chronic dialysis at the hemodialysis units in our region in central Italy. We utilized the recently developed serological assay. Twenty-nine hemodialysis patients (13.3%) and 3 peritoneal dialysis patients (4.8%) were anti-HCV positive. Of these, 13 (40.6%) had antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) indicating prior hepatitis B infection. The anti-HCV seropositive patients had been on dialysis longer than the seronegative ones; they had received more transfusions than the others but without a significant difference. The prevalence rate of anti-HCV was statistically significantly higher among hemodialysis patients utilizing the same dialysis equipment for the previous 12 months.     

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B. CONCLUSIONS: Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.     

Prevalence of non-A non-B hepatitis and anti-HCV antibodies in a Portuguese dialysis population.

Non-A Non-B hepatitis (NANBH) is nowadays one of the most common causes of hepatic dysfunction in dialysis patients. We reviewed the records of 231 HBsAg-negative patients in our unit and found 119 patients with biochemical criteria of NANBH (51.5%), 88 of them (68.9%) with circulating antibodies against HCV (chi 2 P less than 0.0001). Such high prevalence of NANBH was due to an outbreak of NANBH in the late 70s and early 80s. Time on haemodialysis (HD) was the major risk factor of NANBH in this population, and no other risk factors were identified. Prevalence of anti-HCV was similar to reports from non-uraemic populations. Anti-HCV seems to be a reliable test to confirm NANBH, but not better than using common biochemical criteria of NANBH to manage these patients in dialysis units.     

Hepatitis C virus-related acute and chronic hepatitis in hemodialysis patients.

The incidence of HCV antibodies has been evaluated in 123 chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients (Group A; 55 M and 68 F) and in 37 consecutive HD patients (group B) admitted to our hospitals for acute hepatitis. In group A, HCV antibodies were present in 27% of the patients. 20 of 36 (55%) had previously received blood transfusions. 21 patients (58%) were also positive for HBV Ab. In 8 patients, ALT were significantly increased. In group B, the diagnosis of HCV-related acute hepatitis was made in 11 patients. 8 of them had previously received blood transfusions. Seroconversion occurred 2-3 months after onset of the disease.     

Hepatitis G virus exposure in dialysis patients

Background Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a blood-borne virus. The predominant route of its transmission is parenteral. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of HGV exposure in haemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients in Iran. Methods This study was performed in a major dialysis centre in Tehran, Iran. The study cohort consisted of 77 patients on HD and 13 patients on CAPD. The presence of anti-HGV envelope protein E2 (anti-E2) in the blood serum, as determined by means of an ELISA assay, indicated HGV exposure. All patients were also screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV). In patients who tested positive for anti-E2, HGV RNA was detected by RT-PCR using primers derived from the NS5A region of the viral genome. Results In total, 3.89% of the HD patients and none of the CAPD patients tested positive for anti-E2. None of the patients tested positive for HGV RNA. The mean age of the anti-E2-positive patients was 53.3 ± 26.5 years, with 66.66% having previously received blood transfusion. The mean duration of dialysis of the anti-E2-positive patients was 68 ± 64 months. Co-infection with HCV or HBV was not observed in the anti-E2 positive patients. Conclusion The rate of exposure to HGV was low among the dialysis patients in our study. The appearance of anti-E2 was accompanied by clearance of serum HGV-RNA. No relationship was noted between HGV exposure and age, sex, history of blood transfusion, time on dialysis and HCV or HBV markers.     

Does hepatitis C virus affect the reactivation of hepatitis B virus following renal transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is endemic in Taiwan. Transplantation followed by long-term immunosuppressive medications may precipitate HBV reactivation. Interference of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with HBV gene expression and replication has been confirmed in many studies involving non-transplant populations. This study investigates the incidence of HBV reactivation following renal transplantation and compares the clinical outcome, especially the liver outcome, of patients with or without HCV co-infection. METHODS: Fifty-one of 512 renal transplant recipients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen before surgery, and were followed for 81.6+/-7.5 (4-120) months. Seventeen of 51 patients acquired HCV before transplantation and six patients acquired HCV after renal transplantation. RESULTS: At the end of this assessment, we had 28 patients who suffered HBV reactivation and another 23 patients who suffered no HBV reactivation. Initially, we found a significant difference of HCV carriage (P<0.05) between patients with (seven out of 28 or 25%) or without (21 out of 23 or 91.3%) HBV reactivation. Further inspection showed that 21 of the 28 patients without HCV co-infection and seven of the 23 patients with HCV co-infection suffered HBV reactivation. After comparison, we found a lower incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV co-infection than in patients without HCV co-infection (P<0.05). In contrast to the latter, we found that patients with HCV co-infection suffering HBV reactivation tended to have a late onset of HBV reactivation (P<0.05). Otherwise, there was no difference in hepatitis severity, in terms of peak alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin levels and hepatitis reactivation-related death, between these two groups of patients. Finally, a multivariable analysis also revealed that HCV carriage was indeed an independent variable leading to the reduced incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV co-infection. CONCLUSION: HCV might affect the reactivation of HBV by decreasing the incidence or delaying the onset of HBV reactivation in renal transplant recipients carrying both HBV and HCV.     

Hepatitis Status and Mortality in Hemodialysis Population

The role of hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infection in mortality among MHD patients is poorly understood. Recent studies have shown that HCV positivity is associated with significantly higher cardiovascular mortality, especially in dialysis patients younger than 65 years. However, little information is available in European renal registries about mortality among HBV and HCV positive MHD patients. We prospectively followed all patients (prevalents and incidents) attending the dialysis center in the Sicilian region since January 1, 1999, up to December 31, 2000. Those who died for any cause after the starting point were identified and included in the cases population. In all, 698 eligible cases were found. For each case, three controls extracted from the Registry were matched by age at death (within five years) and sex. We calculated the sample size of 698 cases and three controls for each case, assuming the power of the study to be 80%, with an estimated prevalence of exposure among controls of 3.0%. The χ² and the t-test were used to evaluate possible differences among cases and controls for the different variables under investigation. The ORs of the association between hepatitis infection and mortality, adjusted for each of the possible confounding factors, was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test. The prevalence of Hepatitis C (HCV) was much higher among case compared with controls, both in males (23.4%?vs. 17.7?%) and females (25.0%?vs. 22.4%). In the multivariate model, the association between HCV and mortality maintained a significant association only among women aged?<65 years with an OR of 1.77 (95%?CI: 1.12–2.79). We also observed a correlation between increased risk of mortality in hemodialysis and HCV-positive patients with a longer time on dialysis. Our results suggest that HCV positivity among MHD patients is associated with significantly higher mortality in female aged?<65 years. For this reason we should be more aggressive in identifying, preventing, and treating HCV infection among patients with end stage renal disease.     

Hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients with liver disease. The western Cape experience.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a recently characterised non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) agent, which appears to be important in both parenteral and sporadic NANBH. HCV infection has been associated with the development of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatoma. Groups of patients in the western Cape with chronic liver disease and hepatoma were screened for antibodies to HCV and the results were confirmed by standard neutralisation tests. Three of 19 patients with cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse or classic auto-immune chronic active hepatitis were considered to have antibodies to HCV at initial screening. All of these were false-positive results. Five of 20 patients with presumptive chronic NANBH were considered possibly to have antibodies to HCV. Only 1 patient with post-transfusional NANBH was confirmed to have specific HCV antibodies. Two of 30 patients with hepatoma had specific anti-HCV antibodies in contrast to 11 others with serum HBsAg positivity. One hundred blood transfusion donors and 25 antenatal patients were tested concurrently and shown to be negative for anti-HCV. Specific antibodies to HCV were present in very few patients with cirrhosis, presumptive NANBH and hepatoma tested in this local survey. False-positive reactions appeared to occur at a higher rate than true-positive results.     

Incidence of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Dual Infection in Egyptian Patients on Haemodialysis

Hepatitis viral infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis patients. The aim of the present work is to study the prevalence and possible risk factors of hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and dual infection in haemodialysis patients. Three hundred forty patients with end-stage renal disease, 266 males (78.2%) with mean age of 50.9?±?11.6 years and 74 females (21.8%) with mean age of 53.5?±?10.5 years on haemodialysis, were recruited from four haemodialysis units. They were screened for the presence of HCV, HBV and dual HCV and HBV infections and possible risk factors for acquiring these infections in those patients during the period between June 2007 and August 2009. One hundred ninety-six (57.7%) patients were HCV positive while 12 (3.5%) patients had HBV infection. A dual infection with both viruses was observed in 26 patients (7.6%).There was a significant difference in the number of blood transfusions among HCV-positive, HBV-positive and dual infection patients and negative patients (12.4?±?7.6, 13.8?±?6.8, 13.5?±?8.3 vs. 5.2?±?3.4 transfusions, p?<?0.01). HCV, HBV and dual HCV and HBV patients have been on dialysis for a longer period than the negative patients (7.5?±?5, 6.2?±?3.6, 7.5?±?5.4 vs. 4.4?±?4 years, p?<?0.01). Higher HCV was associated with longer haemodialysis duration and history of previous blood transfusion and not associated with dialysis in multicentres. HBV and dual infection is less prevalent than HCV in haemodialysis units.     

Occupational risk of hepatitis B and C infections in urologists.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and the related risk factors among urologic surgery patients and urologists. This cross-sectional, prospective study included 300 consecutive urologic surgery patients and 24 urologists working in our department. The patients and urologists with positive serology for any of the hepatitis viruses were questioned for risk factors including previous transfusions, surgery, endoscopy, intravenous drug abuse and homosexuality. Positive serology for HBV and/or HCV was found in 47.4% of the patients, and the rate of the patients with antigenemia, the major risk group for the urology team, was 9.9%. Of the 24 urologists working in our department, 3 were antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) positive and 2 were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive. The presence of a risk factor among patients with HBsAg was found in 78.9% and in 100% of those with anti-HCV. The prevalence of hepatitis in urologic surgery patients and urologists is poorly described. This study indicates a high prevalence of HBV and HCV seropositivity in urology patients. In urology wards, the risk of hepatitis transmission is estimated to be appreciably high because of the renal transplantation procedure and frequent use of blood and blood-contaminated solutions for transurethral resections or catheter irrigations. Vaccination with HBV vaccine and application of universal precautions during daily practice seem to be the only and most effective means of protection against blood-borne infections.