Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics

The effects of 0.08% (Group A) and 0.25% (Group B) solutions of bupivacaine were compared in a random manner, to assess continuous pump infusion epidural analgesia in labour. Both solutions were infused at a dose rate of 20 mg bupivacaine/hour. The results in all the mothers who had received infusions lasting more than 4 hours were studied. There were 25 in Group A and 28 in Group B. Any treatment during the infusion epidural for inadequate analgesia, hypotension, etc., was recorded as an intervention. The mean of the intervention-free intervals was significantly greater in Group A than in Group B, and significantly fewer top-up injections were required in Group A. The results show that the administration of a 0.08% solution of bupivacaine into the epidural space by continuous pump infusion is more labour saving than the infusion of a 0.25% solution. The concept that a greater volume infusion rate maintains a more extended liquid sleeve of local anaesthetic in the epidural space is supported.     

Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy

The analgesic efficacy and side-effects of combined epidural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine, in comparison with these drugs alone, for postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy (60 patients) were evaluated. Before general anaesthesia, all patients had an epidural catheter placed (Th11-12) and 20 ml of 0.5%, bupivacaine was injected. In random order, epidural infusion was continued for 24 h with either 0.25% bupivacaine 4 ml.h-1 (BUPI-group), a bolus of 2 mg of morphine followed by morphine 0.2 mg.h-1 (MO-group), or a combination of the two drugs (COMB-group). A urinary bladder catheter was kept for 24 h. Supplementary postoperative pain medications were i.m. morphine 0.1 mg.kg-1 or rectal indomethacin 50 mg, on request. Immediately after awakening from general anaesthesia and transfer to the recovery room, 18/20 of the BUPI-group patients, 17/20 of the MO-group patients and 19/20 of the COMB-group patients were pain-free. In the postoperative evening and the first postoperative morning, the corresponding figures were 7/20 and 10/20 in the BUPI-group, 15/20 and 15/20 in the MO-group, and 18/20 and 15/20 in the COMB-group (postop, evening; P less than 0.01 BUPI vs. others). The number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics (morphine and indomethacin during the first 24 h was greatest in the BUPI-group P less than 0.01). The number of patients who vomited during the 24-h period was 3 in the BUPI-group, 9 in the MO-group and 5 in the COMB-group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Continuous postoperative epidural analgesia in management of postoperative surgical pain

In the last fifteen months we have used continuous postoperative epidural analgesia after open urologic surgery and herein report our experience with the first 64 patients. Incisional pain was completely eliminated in 96 percent of patients. Epidural analgesia diminished pain-related pulmonary complications without sedation. Complications were tolerable and manageable. Hypotension due to sympathetic blockade responds to intravenous fluid administration. Urinary retention is avoidable if the epidural infusion is discontinued prior to removing the urethral catheter. Itching is an undesirable consequence observed by 20 percent of patients when morphine is used.     

Continuous infusion of epidural morphine to relieve postoperative pain. Protocol and results

We have evaluated the efficaciousness and side effects of continuous administration of morphine by lumbar epidural route for relieving postoperative pain in major surgery of the abdomen and orthopedic surgery. Lumbar epidural catheters were placed to 25 patients (mean age, 52 years) before induction of general anesthesia. All patients received a 4 mg bolus dose of morphine sulfate 1 hour before finalization of general anesthesia and subsequently they were placed on a continuous infusion of morphine sulfate at 0.3-1 mg/h. All patients achieved analgesia which maintained then pain-free and allowed early ambulation and initiation of active respiratory physiotherapy. Duration of continuous analgesia varied from 3 to 5 days. No patient presented respiratory depression; four presented nausea and eight had urinary retention. We believe that continuous epidural infusion of morphine is efficacious and safe for the treatment of acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdomen major surgery and orthopedic surgery.     

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children

Epidural ropivacaine infusion has been used in children; however, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. In this study, we compared the clinical efficiency of PCEA and of continuous epidural infusion analgesia (CEA) in children. Forty-eight children undergoing orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive PCEA or CEA with ropivacaine 0.2%. All patients underwent a standard general anesthetic. Children also received ketoprofen and propacetamol. Pain scores and side effects were recorded for 48 h. If the visual analog score scale score was >4 of 10, analgesia was considered inadequate, and rescue treatment was administered. Both groups obtained effective pain relief. Children in the PCEA group received significantly less local anesthetic than those in the CEA group (0.20 +/- 0.08 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) versus 0.40 +/- 0.08 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1); P < 0.001). Motor effects, supplemental analgesic requirements, and side effects did not differ. We concluded that PCEA with ropivacaine 0.2% can provide adequate postoperative analgesia for pediatric orthopedic procedures with smaller dose requirements than CEA. IMPLICATIONS: We studied patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous epidural infusion analgesia (CEA) with 0.2% ropivacaine during the postoperative period in children. We found that either PCEA or CEA with plain ropivacaine 0.2% provided adequate pain relief in children during the first 48-h postoperative course. However, adequate analgesia was obtained with 50% less volume infused with PCEA compared with CEA.     

Continuous epidural infusion for postoperative mechanical ventilation

We evaluated in analgesic and sedative effects of continuous epidural infusion of two analgesic regimens in ventilated patients following esophagectomy. Forty-six patients, divided into two treatment groups, received postoperative continuous epidural infusion of morphine, or that of a combination of bupivacaine and morphine. Assessments were made with the following indices: pain relief score, somnolence score, patient ventilator coordination score, and the number of supplemental administrations of analgesics and sedatives. No significant differences occurred in somnolence scores or patient ventilator coordination scores between the two groups, which revealed satisfactory sedation for mechanical ventilation. Patients receiving the combination of bupivacaine and morphine had significantly less pain postoperatively, requiring a smaller number of supplemental administrations of analgesics and sedatives (P 0.05). It is concluded that: 1) continuous epidural infusion of analgesics gives potent analgesia and sedation of ventilated patients following esophagectomy; 2) the combination of bupivacaine and morphine gives pain relief superior to morphine alone.(Sakura S, Sumi M, Saito Y et al.: Continuous epidural infusion for postoperative mechanical ventilation. J Anesth 4: 219–225, 1990)     

The risks of overly effective postoperative epidural analgesia

Continuous epidural analgesia is frequently used to provide supplemental postoperative pain control. Epidural analgesia has the potential to mask the early symptoms that signal impending complications after even routine surgical procedures. We report a case of sciatic nerve palsy following epidural anesthesia after an uncomplicated leg length correction. Good epidural anesthesia may remove a patient's normal protective sensation, allowing pain and other signs of nerve compression from prolonged unchanged postoperative positioning to go unnoticed. This case highlights the need for heightened awareness of potential neurologic compromise in the setting of epidural analgesia. We recommend closely monitoring the patient's neurologic condition and frequently evaluating the patient's position in bed.     

Fentanyl versus sufentanil: plasma concentrations during continuous epidural postoperative infusion in children

No pharmacokinetic data are available with respect to the plasmaconcentrations and fentanyl or sufentanil during epidural administrationin children. This double-blind randomized study included 12children (5–12 yr). Patients in group F were givenan epidural loading dose of fentanyl 1.5 µg kg^–1and in group S sufentanil 0.6 µg kg^–1.Both groups then received a continuous epidural infusion ofbupivacaine 5 mg kg^–1 day^–1 witheither fentanyl 5 µg kg^–1 day^–1or sufentanil 2 µg kg^–1 day^–1.An epidural PCA system was also given to the children (bolus:bupivacaine 0.2 mg kg^–1 and fentanyl 0.2 µg kg^–1or sufentanil 0.08 µg kg^–1). Maximal medianconcentrations of plasma (0.117–0.247 ng ml^–1for fentanyl and 0.027–0.074 ng ml^–1 forsufentanil) were reached approximately 30 and 20 min respectivelyafter the loading doses. These values were similar to thosemeasured after 48 h. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 615–7 ^* Corresponding author: Service d’Anesthésie et deRéanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel-Dieu, F-44093 Nantescedex 01, France     

Continuous postoperative epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery using ropivacain

We studied the selective block on patients receiving epidural Ropivacain (R) infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Twenty patients received R and twenty patients received Bupivacain (B) via peridural catheter during and after surgery. The patients' age ranged between 40 and 80 and they belonged to ASA I, II and III risk group. The epidural catheter was inserted one day before surgery and the proper position was tested by 80 mg Lidocaine. The epidural needle was inserted via T10-L1 interspaces in upper abdominal surgery and through L1-L3 interspaces in lower abdominal surgery. After the operation continuous epidural infusion of 2 mg/ml solution of R or 2.5 mg/ml solution of B was started. The infusion rate was changed according to the grade of sensory and motor block. The following parameters were observed during the postoperative 72 hours: blood pressure, heart rate, arterial blood O2 saturation, modified Bromage (BMG) score, verbal analogue scale (VAS), the spread of sensory block. Satisfactory sensory blockade was achieved with both local anaesthetics. The required daily dose of R and B increased during 72 hours. VAS scores reached their maximum level within 24 hours and were lower in the R group than in the B group but the difference was not significant. We experienced that 0.25% B causes more intense motor block than 0.2% R in equianalgetic dose but the difference did not reach a significant level. The infusion rate was often decreased because of the unwanted motor block caused by 0.25% B leading to insufficient postoperative analgesia. Because of this fact patients receiving B required opioid addition more often. Our conclusion is that R/B relative dose ratio is 1.2 suggesting that these local anaesthetics have different analgesic potency.     

腹部手术后患者静脉输注丁丙诺啡镇痛的可行性

目的 评价腹部手术后患者静脉输注丁丙诺啡镇痛的可行性.方法 采用多中心、随机、开放、平行、阳性药物对照进行研究,择期全身麻醉下行腹部手术患者200例,年龄18～64岁,ASAⅠ级或Ⅱ级,性别不限,体重50～100 kg,随机分为丁丙诺啡组(B组)和芬太尼组(F组),每组100例.2组术后分别静脉输注丁丙诺啡0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1、芬太尼0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1.采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分)评价术后6、12、24、36和48 h的疼痛程度,于各时点行镇静评分及Prince-Henry评分,监测心率、呼吸频率(RR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2),记录不良反应的发生情况.结果 与F组比较,B组各时点VAS评分、镇静评分和Prince-Henry评分差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),恶心发生率较低(P＜0.05);两组各时点RR和SpO2差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 静脉输注丁丙喏啡0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1可有效缓解腹部手术后患者疼痛,且不良反应少.     

Plasma bupivacaine concentrations during postoperative continuous epidural analgesia

Postoperative analgesia and plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were evaluated in six patients receiving intermittent epidural bupivacaine for a period of 72 hours following large bowel surgery. Repeated doses were administered every hour by a new automatic, specially designed pump. Venous plasma bupivacaine concentrations showed accumulation for up to 48-60 hours during administration and were mostly less than 2 micrograms/ml except in an elderly, frail patient in whom a peak of 3.9 micrograms/ml was observed. This convenient, low-dose, pulsed technique provided excellent analgesia although special care may be necessary in the elderly and frail patient if potentially toxic levels are to be avoided.     

Continuous epidural administration of midazolam and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Midazolam has been reported to have a spinally mediated analgesic effect. Clinically, single-shot epidural or spinal administration of midazolam has been shown to have an analgesic effect on perioperative pain. In this study, we investigated the analgesic effect of continuous epidural administration of midazolam with bupivacaine on postoperative pain. METHODS: Four groups of 20 patients who underwent gastrectomy or cholecystectomy were studied. Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 100 mg (Group C), bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 10 mg (Group M10), or bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 20 mg (Group M20) in 40 ml per 12 h was started after surgery using the balloon infuser. Group I received intermittent epidural bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml every 2 h. When necessary, an indomethacin suppository and then a single epidural shot of bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml was administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, analgesic area, analgesia score, and sedation score were monitored for 12 h postoperatively. Memory and frequencies of supplemental analgesia (indomethacin suppositories and epidural bupivacaine) were also checked. RESULTS: Group M20 showed a significantly wider area of pinprick analgesia and better analgesia scores than other groups. The need for rescue analgesics were significantly less in Group M20. Sedation and amnesia were more pronounced in Group M20 than the other groups. CONCLUSION: Adding midazolam (10 to 20 mg per 12 h) to continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain can provide a better analgesia, amnesia and sedation than bupivacaine alone.     

Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia is more effective with epidural methadone than with intravenous methadone in thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects of epidural and intravenous methadone for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after thoracic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind trial enrolling 30 patients distributed in 2 groups to receive intravenous methadone (ivPCA group) or epidural methadone (epPCA group). Patients in both groups were administered a loading dose of 0.05 mg.kg-1 followed by infusion of 0.5 mg.h-1. The patients could self-dose 0.5 mg with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a maximum of 4 doses per hour. Patient characteristics, type and duration of surgery and fentanyl dose were recorded. Pain was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS). Level of sedation, respiratory rate and occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus were also recorded over the first 24 hours. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable. Pain was greater in the ivPCA group than in the epPCA group in the second hour (VAS 3.93 +/- 1.9 and 2.4 +/- 1.65, respectively; P < .05) and the third hour (VAS 3.57 +/- 1.65 and 1.5 +/- 1.16, respectively; P < .05). The total dose of methadone administered was 25.34 +/- 5.65 mg in the ivPCA group and 18.82 +/- 3.52 mg in the epPCA group (P < .002). There were no significant differences in side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that epidural methadone has an intrinsic spinal effect regardless of whether or not there is extra-spinal action arising from syste mic absorption. Epidural methadone provides a more adequate analgesic effect in less time and at a lower dose. Both approaches provide good postoperative analgesia with few side effects.     

Comparison of 2 concentrations of levobupivacaine in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects of 2 different concentrations of levobupivacaine given as an equal milligram-bolus dose (5 mg) via patient-controlled epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. SETTING: Postanesthesia care unit and surgical wards of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-nine patients (41 with complete file) undergoing major lower abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 1.5 mg/mL (bolus 3.3 mL, lockout 20 minutes, n = 26) and 5 mg/mL (bolus 1 mL, lockout 20 minutes, n = 23). The epidural catheter was inserted in the low thoracic level (T9-T12) before induction of a standardized general anesthesia technique. MEASUREMENTS: Demography, upper sensory block, visual analog scale scores at rest and after coughing, levobupivacaine and rescue morphine consumption, motor blockade, hemodynamics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation, and patient satisfaction were recorded within the first 48 hours. MAIN RESULTS: Both groups were similar with regard to demographics, upper level of sensory blockade (T8), and visual analog scale pain scores at rest and after coughing, as well as levobupivacaine and subcutaneous rescue morphine consumption. Motor blockade in the lower limbs was very low in both groups. Arterial blood pressure was slightly lower in the 5 mg/mL group during the first 24 hours (P = 0.052). Five patients in the 1.5 mg/mL and 7 in the 5 mg/mL group had postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.43). No other side effects were recorded, and all of the patients were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Administering the same dose of levobupivacaine in either a low or high concentration via patient-controlled epidural analgesia mode provides an equal quality of analgesia with no difference in the incidence of side effects.