Safety and immunogenicity of a measles–mumps–rubella–varicella vaccine given as a second dose in children up to six years of age

Two doses of measles–mumps–rubella vaccine (MMR) are widely recommended and consideration is being given to a similar schedule for varicella vaccine. A combined measles–mumps–rubella–varicella vaccine (MMRV) could be considered for this second dose in children previously vaccinated separately with MMR and varicella vaccines. Healthy children (N = 390) aged 15–75 months (median 54 months) previously immunized with MMR and varicella vaccines were randomly allocated to receive MMRV or separate injections of MMR and varicella vaccines. Before administration of study vaccines, seropositivity rates were 96.4% for measles, 94.3% for mumps, 99.5% for rubella, and 97.9% for varicella. Post-immunization, seropositivity rates were 99.5% for measles and mumps and 100% for rubella and varicella in the MMR + varicella group and 100% for all four antigens in the MMRV group; a 26.2- and 27.2-fold increase in varicella titer was observed in the MMR + varicella vaccine and MMRV groups, respectively. Except for more frequent pain in the MMRV group (33.3% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.043), there were no differences in the incidence of local and solicited symptoms between groups. In children primed with MMR and varicella vaccine, MMRV had non-inferior immunogenicity and similar safety profiles as a second dose of licensed MMR and varicella vaccine administered concomitantly.     

Incidence of herpes zoster among varicella-vaccinated children,by number of vaccine doses and simultaneous administration of measles,mumps, and rubella vaccine

IntroductionChildren may receive measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and varicella (VAR) vaccines separately or as measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV). We examined whether pediatric herpes zoster (HZ) incidence varied by pattern of varicella vaccine administration.MethodsIn six integrated health systems, we examined HZ incidence among children turning 12 months old during 2003–2008. All received varicella and MMR vaccines on recommended schedules. Cases were identified through 2014 using ICD-9 codes. Incidence was examined by number of varicella vaccine doses and same-day MMR.ResultsAmong 199,797 children, overall HZ incidence was 18.6/100,000 person-years in the first-dose MMR + VAR group, 17.9/100,000 person-years in the MMRV group, and 7.5/100,000 person-years in the VAR-alone group. HZ incidence was lower following the second dose than before the second dose in all first-dose groups.ConclusionsHZ incidence was not meaningfully different between the MMRV and MMR + VAR first-dose groups. Overall and within first-dose groups, HZ incidence was lower among children receiving two varicella vaccine doses.     

A combined measles,mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (Priorix-Tetra™): Immunogenicity and safety profile

Priorix-Tetra™ (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) is a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) vaccine. Eight studies involving more than 3000 children were reviewed. Compared with co-administration of MMR (Priorix™) and varicella (Varilrix™) vaccines, the MMRV vaccine showed: similar immunogenicity, with immunity shown up to 3 years post-vaccination; a higher rate of fever after the first dose; a slight increase in mild local reactions after the second dose. This MMRV vaccine can be used either as a two-dose vaccine or as a second dose in children primed with separate MMR and/or varicella vaccines, offering a convenient way to introduce varicella vaccination into routine vaccination programmes.     

Risk of febrile seizure after measles–mumps–rubella–varicella vaccine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundConsidering the febrile seizure rate, there is no longer a clear preference for use of measles–mumps–rubella–varicella (MMRV) vaccine over separate measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) and varicella (V) vaccine. This work was undertaken to assess the risk of febrile seizure after MMRV vaccine in children.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and other databases through 12 December 2014. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 3.1.2 and Stata version 12.0.ResultsA total of thirty-nine studies were included. Thirty-one published or unpublished clinical trials involving about 40,000 subjects did not show significant differences in incidence of febrile seizure or vaccine related febrile seizure between MMRV and MMR with or without varicella vaccine after any doses, in the risk windows of 0–28, 0–42 or 0–56 days and 7–10 days. In addition, these studies showed that the receipt of concomitant use of MMRV and other pediatric vaccines was not a significant predictor of febrile seizure. Eight post-marketing observations involving more than 3,200,000 subjects were included. No evidence suggested elevated risk of febrile seizure associated with MMRV vaccine among children aged 4–6 years old during 7–10 days or 0–42 days after vaccination. However, an approximately 2-fold increase in risk of seizure or febrile seizure during 7–10 days or 5–12 days after MMRV vaccination was found among children aged 10–24 months, although the highest incidence of seizure was still lower than 2.95‰.ConclusionsFirst MMRV vaccine dose in children aged 10–24 months was associated with an elevated risk of seizure or febrile seizure. Further post-marketing restudies based on more rigorous study design are needed to confirm the findings.     

Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine followed by one dose of varicella vaccine in children aged 15 months–2 years or 2–6 years primed with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine

In this open, randomized, comparative study (105908/NCT00353288), 458 age-stratified children (15 months–2 years and 2–6 years) previously primed with MMR received one dose of either a combined MMRV vaccine (Priorix-Tetra™, MMRV group) or concomitant MMR and varicella vaccines (Priorix™ and Varilrix™, MMR + V group), followed 42–56 days later by another dose of varicella vaccine (Varilrix™) in both groups. Post-vaccination measles, mumps and rubella seropositivity rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) were high (99.5% for anti-measles and 100% for anti-mumps and anti-rubella) in both vaccine groups. In the two age strata, varicella seroconversion rates were, post-dose 1: ≥97.6% (MMRV), ≥96.6% (MMR + V) and, post-dose 2: 100% in both groups. Post-dose 2, anti-varicella GMTs increased respectively 14.1- and 12.6-fold (MMRV), and 9.8- and 13.1-fold (MMR + V). Both vaccine regimens were well-tolerated. Post-dose 1, the incidence of any solicited local symptom during the 4-days follow-up was ≤28.2% (MMRV) and ≤19.8% (MMR + V) and the incidence of fever >39.5 °C (rectal temperature) within 15 days was ≤2.8% (MMRV) and ≤2.6% (MMR + V). This MMRV vaccine appears an immunogenic and safe substitute for a second dose of MMR vaccine in young children. The increase in anti-varicella antibodies observed after a second dose of varicella vaccine supports a two-dose schedule for varicella-containing vaccine.     

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a live attenuated tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine

In countries where routine varicella vaccination is implemented, it is usually given at the same age as that recommended for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination. A combined multivalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine would offer the convenience of a single injection and facilitate implementation of varicella vaccination into routine childhood immunisation schedules. We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a tetravalent MMRV candidate vaccine compared to an extemporaneous mix of a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine (MMR/V), and to a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine alone. A multicentre study was conducted in which a total of 240 healthy children aged 12 months (80 per group) were randomised to receive MMRV, MMR/V, or MMR alone. Active surveillance for adverse events was undertaken for 43 days post-vaccination. Blood samples were taken prior to vaccination and at 60 days post-vaccination. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of pain, redness, or swelling at the site of vaccination. There was no significant difference in the rate of any fever (axillary temperature >or=37.5 degrees C) and grade 3 fever (axillary temperature >39.0 degrees C) between the groups receiving MMRV and MMR during the 43-day follow-up period. Although, a significant increase was found for fever of any cause with onset between days 0 and 14 for MMRV compared to the MMR group, there was no significant difference in grade 3 fever rates during the same period. With respect to immunogenicity, MMRV and MMR/V demonstrated similar seroconversion rates to each component compared to MMR alone, with at least 91.9% of subjects in all groups seroconverting to each vaccine component 60 days after vaccination. Decreased GMTs for varicella antibody at day 60 indicated that there may have been inhibition of this response compared to MMR/V. This tetravalent MMRV candidate vaccine showed promising results, although further examination of the possible increase in minor fever and decreased varicella immunogenicity should be assessed in future studies.     

Update: recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding administration of combination MMRV vaccine

On February 27, 2008, new information was presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the risk for febrile seizures among children aged 12-23 months after administration of the combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccine (ProQuad, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey). This report summarizes current knowledge regarding the risk for febrile seizures after MMRV vaccination and presents updated ACIP recommendations that were issued after presentation of the new information. These updated recommendations remove ACIP's previous preference for administering combination MMRV vaccine over separate injections of equivalent component vaccines (i.e., measles, mumps, and rubella [MMR] vaccine and varicella vaccine).     

One or two doses of live varicella virus-containing vaccines: Efficacy,persistence of immune responses,and safety six years after administration in healthy children during their second year of life

BackgroundThis phase III B follow-up of an initial multicenter study (NCT00226499) will evaluate the ten-year efficacy of two doses of the combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) and one dose of the live attenuated varicella vaccine (V) versus a measles-mumps-rubella control group (MMR) for the prevention of clinical varicella disease. Here we present efficacy results for six years post-vaccination.MethodsIn phase A of the study, healthy children aged 12–22 months from ten European countries were randomized (3:3:1) and received either two doses of MMRV, or one dose of combined MMR and one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine (MMR+V), or two doses of the MMR vaccine (control), 42 days apart. Vaccine efficacy against all and against moderate or severe varicella (confirmed by detection of viral DNA or epidemiological link) was assessed from six weeks up to six years post-dose 2 for the MMRV and MMR+V groups, and was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The severity of varicella was calculated using the modified Vázquez scale (mild ≤ 7; moderately severe = 8–15; severe ≥ 16). Herpes zoster cases were also recorded.Results5289 children (MMRV = 2279, mean age = 14.2, standard deviation [SD] = 2.5; MMR+V = 2266, mean age = 14.2, SD = 2.4; MMR = 744, mean age = 14.2, SD = 2.5 months) were included in the efficacy cohort. 815 varicella cases were confirmed. Efficacy of two doses of MMRV against all and against moderate or severe varicella was 95.0% (95% CI: 93.6–96.2) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.7–99.6), respectively. Efficacy of one dose of varicella vaccine against all and against moderate or severe varicella was 67.0% (95% CI: 61.8–71.4) and 90.3% (95% CI: 86.9–92.8), respectively. There were four confirmed herpes zoster cases (MMR+V = 2, MMR = 2), all were mild and three tested positive for the wild-type virus.ConclusionsTwo doses of the MMRV vaccine and one dose of the varicella vaccine remain efficacious through six years post-vaccination.     

Assessing the introduction of universal varicella vaccination in the Netherlands

Although varicella is seen as a benign disease in the Netherlands, about 40,000 visits to a general practitioner (GP) are made, over 200 hospital admission occur, and 2.3 persons die on average each year. Most of this burden of disease can be prevented by universal varicella childhood vaccination. Ten years after the introduction of the single-shot, single-component varicella childhood vaccination in the USA, a major reduction in hospitalization, mortality, and burden of disease has been reported. Using our recently vaccine evaluation model for the introduction of a new vaccine in our national immunization program, we have analyzed the feasibility of universal varicella vaccination by replacing the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine with a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine. After structuring and reviewing the available data, two major points of uncertainty remain: (1) the influence of universal childhood vaccination on the incidence of zoster later in life; (2) the cost-effectiveness ratio for the Dutch situation. Despite these uncertainties it is clear that universal childhood vaccination will prevent most of the varicella related GP-visits, hospitalizations, and deaths.     

MMR and MMRV vaccines

Measles, mumps, rubella and varicella are viral infections which can implicate seriously long-term sequelae of infected individuals or even the unborn child. Vaccines against the individual diseases have long been available. Global measles vaccination is estimated to have prevented more than 20 million deaths during 2000–2015. During the same time period, measles incidence decreased from 146 to 36 cases per million populations. Today vaccinations against measles, mumps, rubella and varicella are now carried out mainly with combination vaccines. These are today known as immunogenic and safe. MMRV had similar immunogenicity and overall safety profiles to MMR administered with or without varicella vaccine. This issue provides a review of the different vaccines, mode of administration, catch up immunization and postexposure prophylaxis as well as contraindications and adverse effects of the immunization against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella. The article presents an overview of important information of preventing these diseases with a focus on the existing combination vaccines.     

Parental acceptance of and preferences for administration of routine varicella vaccination in the UK: A study to inform policy

ObjectivesTo explore acceptability of and preferences for the introduction of varicella vaccination to the UK childhood immunisation schedule.DesignWe conducted an online cross-sectional survey exploring parental attitudes towards vaccines in general, and varicella vaccine specifically, and their preferences for how the vaccine should be administered.Participants596 parents (76.3% female, 23.3% male, 0.4% other; mean age 33.4 years) whose youngest child was aged 0–5 years.Main outcome measuresWillingness to accept the vaccine for their child and preferences for how the vaccine should be administered (in combination with the MMR vaccine [MMRV], on the same day as the MMR vaccine but as a separate injection [MMR + V], on a separate additional visit).Results74.0% of parents (95% CI 70.2% to 77.5%) were extremely/somewhat likely to accept a varicella vaccine for their child if one became available, 18.3% (95% CI 15.3% to 21.8%) were extremely/somewhat unlikely to accept it and 7.7% (95% CI 5.7% to 10.2%) were neither likely nor unlikely. Reasons provided by parents likely to accept the vaccine included protection from complications of chickenpox, trust in the vaccine/healthcare professionals, and wanting their child to avoid their personal experience of chickenpox. Reasons provided by parents who were unlikely included chickenpox not being a serious illness, concern about side effects, and believing it is preferable to catch chickenpox as a child rather than as an adult. A combined MMRV vaccination or additional visit to the surgery were preferred over an additional injection at the same visit.ConclusionsMost parents would accept a varicella vaccination. These findings highlight parents’ preferences for varicella vaccine administration, information needed to inform vaccine policy and practice and development of a communication strategy.     

Ten-year follow-up on efficacy,immunogenicity and safety of two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine or one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine: Results from five East European countries

BackgroundWe assessed the 10-year efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) or one dose of a monovalent varicella vaccine (V) in children from Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.MethodsThis was a phase IIIB follow-up of an observer-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00226499). In phase A, healthy children aged 12–22 months from 10 European countries were randomized in a 3:3:1 ratio to receive two doses of MMRV (MMRV group), one dose of MMR followed by one dose of V (MMR + V group), or two doses of MMR (MMR; control group), 42 days apart. Vaccine efficacy (VE) against varicella (confirmed by viral DNA detection or epidemiological link and clinical assessment) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Immunogenicity was assessed as seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded.ResultsA total of 3705 children were vaccinated (1590, MMRV group; 1586, MMR + V group; 529, MMR group). There were 663 confirmed varicella cases (47, MMRV group; 349, MMR + V group; 267, MMR group). VE ranged between 95.4% (Lithuania) and 97.4% (Slovakia) in the MMRV group and between 59.3% (Lithuania) and 74% (Slovakia) in the MMR + V group. At year 10, seropositivity rates were 99.5%–100% in the MMRV group, 98%–100% in the MMR + V group and 50%–100% in the MMR control group, and the anti-VZV antibody GMCs were comparable between MMRV and MMR + V groups. The occurrence of solicited and unsolicited AEs was similar across groups and no SAE was considered as vaccination-related. No new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsOur results indicated that two doses of varicella zoster virus-containing vaccine provided better protection than one dose against varicella and induced antibody responses that persisted 10 years post-vaccination.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose regimen of a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella live vaccine (ProQuad(®)) in infants from 9 months of age

Vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) is currently recommended in developed countries for infants from 12 months of age. However, measles vaccination at 9 months of age is recommended by the WHO in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) schedule and it is therefore possible that MMR or MMRV vaccines might also be given at this age.     

Febrile seizures following measles and varicella vaccines in young children in Australia

BackgroundFebrile seizures (FS) are common in childhood with incidence peaking in the second year of life when measles and varicella-containing vaccines are administered. This study aimed to examine the vaccine-attributable risk of FS following separate administration of MMR and monovalent varicella vaccines (VV) prior to a planned change to MMRV as the second dose of measles-containing vaccine at 18 months of age.MethodsAll FS cases in children aged <5 years from 1st January 2012 to 30th April 2013 were identified from emergency department (ED) and inpatient databases at five Australian tertiary paediatric hospitals participating in PAEDS (Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance). Immunization records were obtained from the Australian Childhood Immunization Register (ACIR). The relative incidence (RI) of FS following MMR dose 1 (MMR1) and VV in children aged 11–23 months was determined using the self-controlled case series (SCCS) method and used to calculate attributable risk.ResultsThere were 2013 FS episodes in 1761 children. The peak age at FS was 18 months. The risk of FS was significantly increased 5–12 days post receipt of MMR1 at 12 months (RI = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.3–2.9]), but not after VV at 18 months (RI = 0.6 [95% CI: 0.3–1.2]. The estimated excess annual number of FS post MMR1 was 24 per 100,000 vaccinated children aged 11–23 months (95% CI = 7–49 cases per 100,000) or 1 per 4167 doses.ConclusionsOur study detected the expected increased FS risk post MMR1 vaccine at 12 months, but monovalent varicella vaccine at age 18 months was not associated with increased risk of FS. This provides baseline data to assess the risk of FS post MMRV, introduced in Australia as the second dose of measles-containing vaccine at 18 months of age in July 2013.     

Decline of varicella vaccination in German surveillance regions after recommendation of separate first-dose vaccination for varicella and measles–mumps–rubella

Background

Germany introduced routine varicella (V) vaccination in 2004. Due to a slightly increased risk of febrile convulsions after first-dose application of combined measles–mumps–rubella–varicella (MMRV) vaccine separate first-dose vaccinations with MMR and monovalent V vaccine were recommended in September 2011.

Methods

We compared V and MMR vaccinations in paediatric practices from two surveillance regions (Munich and Würzburg) one year before and after the change in the recommendation.

Results

A total of 1405/326 monthly reports were provided by a monthly average of 79/14 practices participating in Munich/Würzburg. V first-dose vaccinations (monovalent V or MMRV vaccine) declined by 12% in Munich (from 10.1 to 8.9 vaccinations per month and practice; p < 0.005) and by 4% in Würzburg (from 9.9 to 9.5; p = 0.620), respectively. First-dose vaccinations for MMR (MMR or MMRV vaccine) did not change significantly in both regions.

Conclusion

Acceptance of V vaccination depends in part on the use of combination vaccine.     

Impact of history of febrile convulsions on the risk difference of febrile convulsions with the tetravalent measles–mumps–rubella–varicella vaccine: Post-hoc exploratory analysis of results from a matched-cohort study

This post-hoc analysis of data from a matched cohort study investigated the risk of febrile convulsions (FC) 5–12 days post-first dose of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) in a low-risk population, compared to measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and varicella (V) vaccines administered separately.The low-risk population excluded children with personal history of FC (Scenario 1) and children with personal or/and family history (≥1 parent/sibling) of FC (Scenario 2).Incidence of FC post-MMRV in Scenario 2 (excluding at risk children) (36.3–49.5/100,000) and post-MMR+V in the whole cohort including children with personal/family history of FC (43.6/100,000) were similar. The risk difference of FC increased by 0.2 case/100,000 in Scenario 1 and decreased by 5.3–8.6 cases/100,000 of vaccinated children in Scenario 2, compared to the whole cohort.The overall risk of FC post-first dose MMRV vaccination could be lowered by administering MMRV only to children with no personal or family history of FC.     

Risk of febrile convulsions after MMRV vaccination in comparison to MMR or MMR+V vaccination

Background

In July 2006, Priorix-Tetra™, a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine, was licensed in Germany. Since a postlicensure study had shown a more than twofold elevated risk of febrile convulsions (FC) after first dose vaccination with the combined MMRV vaccine ProQuad^® compared to separately administered MMR and V vaccines (MMR+V), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the German regulatory agency for vaccine licensing and safety, requested a study investigating the risk of FC for Priorix-Tetra™.

Methods

We performed a matched cohort study based on claims data of more than 17 million insurees in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database. All children born between 01.01.2004 and 31.12.2008 who received a 1st dose of MMRV vaccine were matched to children vaccinated with MMR, MMR+V and MMR or MMR+V (combined group), respectively, by sex, age, month of vaccination and statutory health insurance. The primary outcome was defined as hospitalization with a diagnosis of FC without any alternative plausible cause of FC, e.g. an infection or neurological condition, coded as main discharge diagnosis. The secondary outcome excluded only neurological conditions to provide a more comparable outcome definition to the one used in the ProQuad^® study. Numbers needed to harm (NNH), risk ratios and confounder adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated to compare the exposure groups.

Results

In the main risk period 5–12 days after immunization, the adjusted ORs of the primary endpoint for immunization with MMRV vaccine relative to the comparator vaccine indicated in brackets were 4.1 [95% CI 1.3–12.7; MMR], 3.5 [0.7–19.0; MMR+V], and 4.1 [1.5–11.1; MMR and MMR+V]. The corresponding ORs for the secondary outcome were 2.3 [1.4–3.9; MMR], 1.5 [0.8–2.9; MMR+V] and 2.4 [1.5–3.9; MMR and MMR+V].

Conclusions

This study in children younger than 5 years, 90% of them between 11 and 23 months, shows a risk of FC similar in magnitude for Priorix-Tetra™ as has previously been reported for ProQuad^® suggesting a class effect for these quadrivalent vaccines.     

Second dose of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) and the risk of febrile convulsions

IntroductionStudies have shown an increased risk of febrile convulsions (FC) after first immunization with the quadrivalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) compared to a first dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) only or in combination with separately administered varicella vaccine (MMR + V). Therefore, it is recommended to give MMR + V at first dose and MMRV or MMR + V at second dose. Little is known on the risk of FC after MMRV at second dose, especially whether the risk depends on age, sex, history of FC or type of first dose vaccine.MethodsA retrospective cohort study using claims data from the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research database (GePaRD) was performed in children born between January 1st, 2004 and October 31st, 2015 who received two doses of MMRV, MMR + V or MMR. Cases were defined as hospitalization with a diagnosis of FC without neurological conditions coded as main discharge diagnosis. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intevals (CIs) were calculated to compare the risk of FC. Stratified analyses were performed to examine potential effect modification by age, sex, history of FC or type of first dose vaccine.ResultsIn the first 30 days after second dose vaccination, 464 FCs were observed in a cohort of 528,639 children with a median age of 17 months. After adjustment for potential confounders, the adjusted OR for FC in the 30 days after vaccination was 1.25 (95% CI 0.67–2.30) for MMRV compared to MMR + V and 1.04 (0.82–1.32) for MMRV compared to MMR. History of FC was the most important risk factor with an OR of 36.26 (29.30–44.89). We found no effect modification by age, sex, history of FC, or type of first dose vaccine.ConclusionUse of MMRV at second dose is not associated with an increased risk of FC compared to MMR + V or MMR, irrespective of age, sex, history of FC, or type of first dose vaccine.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine following a 4-week or a 12-month interval between two doses

Background

The MMRV combination vaccine, Priorix-Tetra™, is currently licensed in several European countries using a two-dose schedule in infants aged ≥9 months, with a preferred 6-week to 3-month interval between doses. This study was undertaken to generate safety and immunogenicity data for two doses of MMRV vaccine administered according to dose schedules using the shortest permitted interval of 4 weeks versus a longer interval of 12 months, which would allow flexible adaptation to local immunization calendars.

Methods

Healthy children aged 11-13 months were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2 doses of either: MMRV vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMRV-4W group, N = 188), MMRV vaccine with a 12-month interval between doses (MMRV-12M group, N = 184), or MMR vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMR group, N = 187). Blood samples were taken prior to, and 4-6 weeks after each vaccination.

Results

Post-Dose 2, both MMRV groups exhibited an adequate immunogenic response for all components; however the MMRV-12M group showed significantly greater geometric mean titers for mumps, rubella and varicella. Two varicella breakthrough cases occurred within the 12-month interval between doses in the MMRV-12M group. Local and general reactogenicity results were similar for all groups except for the MMRV-4W group, which had a greater incidence of fever during Days 0-14 post-Dose 1.

Conclusions

Two doses of MMRV vaccine administered in the second year of life elicited adequate immunogenicity and were well-tolerated whether administered with a dose interval of 4 weeks or 12 months.     

Die Varizellenimpfung in Deutschland

In 2004, a general varicella immunization was introduced in Germany for infants from the age of 11 months, followed by the subsequent recommendation in 2009 of a second vaccine dose. The vaccination is carried out at the same time as the immunization against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR). Results of the nationwide sentinel surveillance of varicella and herpes zoster implemented by the Varicella Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Varizellen, AGV) show that the defined goals for varicella immunization (reduction of varicella-related morbidity, complications and hospitalizations) have been reached within a few years owing to the advances in vaccine coverage. Although coverage rates for varicella have not yet reached the same levels as for MMR, varicella immunization seems to have benefited from the established MMR immunization schedule. Moreover, there is no evidence for an adverse effect on the use and acceptance of the MMR vaccine. Lessons learnt in measles epidemiology (such as trends in the incidence of the disease in adolescents and infants), as well as in the history of MMR recommendations, may be useful for the evaluation of future epidemiological changes with respect to varicella and herpes zoster. In view of a rapidly waning immunity against the varicella zoster virus after vaccination with one dose and the lifelong persistence of the virus, achieving a robust and sustainable immunity in the general population seems to be an ambitious goal. However, this accomplishment will be indispensable in preventing breakthrough infections and a shift of varicella to older ages and in avoiding an increase in herpes zoster incidence.