Absence of PERV specific humoral immune response in baboons after transplantation of porcine cells or organs

Xenotransplantation of pig organs seems a promising way of overcoming the prevailing limitation on allotransplantation due to donor numbers. However, as porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) can infect human cells in vitro, there is substantial concern regarding the risk of a PERV infection in xenogeneic transplant recipients. Cultured porcine endothelial cells, stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and pancreatic islet cells can release PERV infectious for human cells in vitro, but it is currently unknown whether PERV is released in vivo, whether these viral particles can infect the transplant recipient, and whether they are pathogenic. In a retrospective study 15 immunosuppressed baboons were tested for a specific immune response against PERV after transplantation of porcine endothelial cells, mononuclear blood cells, and lungs. Anti-PERV antibody expression was analyzed with peptide-based, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and highly sensitive Western Blot assays. This xenotransplantation study using nonhuman primates found no evidence of PERV specific humoral immune response. Our data suggest that no productive PERV infection and no continuous PERV release takes place in the nonhuman primates analyzed in this study.     

Molecular characterization of the porcine endogenous retrovirus subclass A and B envelope gene from pigs

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs has the potential to overcome the current critical shortage of allogenic organs for transplantation in humans. However, the existence of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) presents a problem for the clinical use of xenografts from pigs. In an attempt to understand the molecular characteristics of PERVs, we cloned the PERV env gene from six pig breeds (ie, Berkshire, Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire, and two types of miniature pigs) in Korea. A total of 141 env clones were isolated and their sequences were analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses of these genes revealed the presence of PERVs, from both classes A and B, in 54% and 46% of the env clones, respectively. Among these clones, 37 isolates had the correct open reading frame (ORF; 27 clones in subclass A and 10 clones in subclass B), while the others had premature termination. These PERV nucleotide sequences can be used in a database for comparisons of PERV distribution among different pig breeds and for monitoring PERV infection using isolates with functional ORFs. Recombinant envelope of subclass A and B with functional ORF was expressed by vaccinia virus systems. Additionally isolated env clones can be used for various experiments, such as PERV control and infectivity tests, and may enhance the understanding of molecular mechanisms through pseudotyped PERV viruses.     

Development and validation of a Western immunoblot assay for detection of antibodies to porcine endogenous retrovirus

BACKGROUND: Reports that pig endogenous retrovirus (PERV) infects human cells in vitro have heightened the importance of molecular and serologic monitoring of xenograft recipients for evidence of infection with PERV. We report the development and validation of a PERV-specific Western immunoblot assay for the diagnostic testing of porcine xenografts recipients. This assay is based upon the serological cross-reactivity observed between PERV variants capable of infecting human cells in vitro and other mammalian C type retroviruses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Strong reactivity between PERV expressing embryonic pig kidney PK-15 cells and antisera raised against whole virus preparations of murine leukemia virus, gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV), and simian sarcoma-associated virus was demonstrated by an immunofluorescence assay, suggesting specific antigenic cross-reactivity between this group of viruses and PERV. Western immunoblot analysis demonstrated that anti-GALV antisera reacted with three proteins in PK-15 cells having molecular masses of 30, 55, and 66 kDa. Antisera specific for the Gag proteins of either GALV or simian sarcoma-associated virus reacted with the 30-kDa (major) and 55-kDa (minor) proteins present in PK-15 cells and in PERV-infected 293 human kidney cells, likely representing reactivity to the processed and precursor forms of the PERV Gag protein, respectively. No reactivity was seen in uninfected 293 cells. Analysis of plasma samples from 200 United States blood donors and from 58 human immunodeficiency virus-1, 18 human immunodeficiency virus-2, 13 human T-cell lymphotrophic virus-I, 21 human T-cell lymphotrophic virus-II, and 15 cytomegalovirus infected controls were negative. CONCLUSIONS: As this assay is based on PERV antigen derived from infected human cells, it clearly has the capacity to detect a serologic response towards PERV variants that have zoonotic potential and will allow for the accurate determination of PERV-specific seroreactivity in porcine xenograft recipients.     

No evidence for infection of human cells with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) after exposure to porcine fetal neuronal cells

BACKGROUND: Recent demonstration of human cell infection in vitro with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) has raised safety concerns for new therapies that involve transplantation of pig cells or organs to humans. To assess better the specific risk that may be associated with the transplantation of fetal pig neuronal cells to the central nervous system of patients suffering from intractable neurologic disorders (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and epilepsy), we have performed studies to determine whether there is evidence for in vivo or in vitro transmission of PERV from fetal pig neuronal cells to human cells. METHODS: Ventral mesencephalon (VM) and lateral ganglionic eminence cells were isolated from fetal pigs and transplanted into patients with neurological conditions as part of clinical studies. Blood samples taken from patients at various time points posttransplant were tested for evidence of PERV. In vitro studies to test for PERV infection of human cells after cocultivation with either fetal porcine ventral mesencephalon or porcine fetal lateral ganglionic eminence cells were also performed. RESULTS: We found no evidence of PERV provirus integration in the DNA from PBMC of 24 neuronal transplant recipients. In addition, no PERV was released from cultured fetal porcine neuronal cultures, and there was no transfer of PERV from fetal pig neuronal cells to human cells in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate by both examination of transplant patient blood samples and in vitro studies that there is no evidence for transmission of PERV from porcine fetal neural cells to human cells.     

Analysis of potential porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission in a whole-organ xenotransplantation model without interfering microchimerism

The question whether porcine xenografts can lead to porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) infection of recipients is critical for the evaluation of the safety of pig-to-man xenotransplantation. Unfortunately, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis of potential PERV infections in nonhuman-primate whole-organ xenotransplantation models is hampered by false positive results due to chimeric porcine cells. To avoid the inherent analytical problem of xenomicrochimerism, we developed a non-life-supporting pig-to-primate kidney xenotransplantation model: porcine kidneys were transplanted, whereas the functioning recipient kidneys remained in situ. Subsequent to rejection (after 2 hours to 15 days), xenografts were removed, and recipients remained alive for up to 287 days. Immunosuppressive therapy based on cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and steroids was maintained for 28 days after transplantation. Using appropriate PCR assays, xenochimerism was found in tissue samples and partly even in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) while the porcine kidneys were in situ. After graft removal, xenochimerism was no longer detectable, thus allowing analysis for possible PERV transmission.     

Porcine endogenous retrovirus encodes xenoantigens involved in porcine cellular xenograft rejection by mice

BACKGROUND: Identification of the antigens that stimulate transplant rejection can help develop graft-specific antirejection strategies. The xenoantigens recognized during rejection of porcine cellular xenografts have not been clearly defined, but it has been assumed that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) xenoantigens are involved. METHODS: The role of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) as a source of xenoantigens was examined. The authors used morphometry to compare the kinetics of swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) pig thyroid xenograft rejection in control mice and mice immunized with PERV PK15 cells (porcine kidney epithelial cells), PERV SLA pig peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), PERV virions purified from PK15 cells, and PERV or PERV A pseudotypes produced from infected human 293 cells. The tempo of rejection for cellular xenografts of PERV A pseudotype-producing human 293 cells, uninfected human 293 cells, and PK15 cells in PERV-preimmunized and control mice was also compared. RESULTS: Mice immunized with PK15 cells rejected pig thyroid xenografts significantly faster at day 5 than control mice and mice immunized with pig PBL. This correlated with the amount of PERV RNA and virions produced, but not with the amount of SLA class I MHC expressed by PK15 cells. Immunization of mice with PERV virions purified from porcine PK15 cells and with PERV virions or PERV A pseudotypes produced by human 293 cells also induced accelerated xenograft rejection by 5 days. Accelerated rejection induced by virus pretreatment was CD4 T-cell dependent and restricted to PERV-expressing cellular xenografts of porcine or nonporcine origin. CONCLUSIONS: PERV acts as a significant source of xenoantigens that target porcine cellular xenografts for rejection.     

Reversal of diabetes in non-immunosuppressed rhesus macaques by intraportal porcine islet xenografts precedes acute cellular rejection

BACKGROUND: The functional response and immunobiology of primarily non-vascularized islet cell xenografts remain poorly defined in non-human primates. METHODS: We transplanted 20,000 adult porcine islet equivalents/kg (purified and cultured for 48-h) intraportally into six streptozotocin-diabetic and two non-diabetic rhesus macaques. Two recipients were killed at various intervals post-transplant for histologic examination of livers bearing xenografts. RESULTS: Plasma glucose levels in diabetic recipients averaged 94 mg/dl at 12 h, 92 mg/dl at 24 h, 147 mg/dl at 48 h, and 157 mg/dl at 72 h post-transplant. Serum porcine C-peptide was present in eight of eight recipients at 12 h, in five of six at 24 h, in four of four at 48 h, and in one of two at 72 h post-transplant. C3a and SC5b-9 plasma levels increased at 12 h post-transplant and returned to pre-transplant levels by 24 h. IgG, IgM anti-pig and anti-Gal IgG serum antibody levels did not increase post-transplant. Rejection was initiated by IgM and complement deposition on islets. Neutrophils dominated the cellular infiltrate at 12 h; CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were the main infiltrating cells at 24, 48, and 72 h; and macrophages increasingly infiltrated xenografts starting at 24 h post-transplant. Numerous xenoislets were present at all time points; their proportion without intraislet infiltrates decreased from 65% at 24 h to 17% at 72 h post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Pig-to-primate intraportal islet xenografts reverse diabetes and the majority of intraportally transplanted xenogeneic islets are not subject to hyperacute rejection. They undergo acute cellular rejection mediated by CD4+- and CD8+ T cells and macrophages.     

Species incompatibilities in the pig-to-macaque islet xenotransplant model affect transplant outcome: a comparison with allotransplantation

Graham ML, Bellin MD, Papas KK, Hering BJ, Schuurman H‐J. Species incompatibilities in the pig‐to‐macaque islet xenotransplant model affect transplant outcome: a comparison with allotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2011; 18: 328–342. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Porcine islet transplantation into diabetic non‐human primates is considered most relevant in translational research supporting a clinical application. Most studies have focused on immunosuppressive protocols, while metabolic aspects have mainly been utilized in graft monitoring. We evaluated data from our group regarding human and non‐human primate (NHP) allotransplantation and pig‐to‐NHP xenotransplantation to identify incompatibilities in metabolic factors and their consequences for transplant outcomes. Methods: Basic gluco‐metabolic parameters (fasting blood glucose, C‐peptide, and response to stimulation with arginine or glucose) were derived from literature (humans), 72 macaques, and 47 adult Landrace pigs. Islet preparations from 15 human deceased donors, 61 macaques, and 23 adult pigs were compared with respect to yield, fractional viability assessed by oxygen consumption normalized for DNA, and in vitro glucose‐induced insulin release. Metabolic parameters at day 75 after a single islet transplantation in the liver were compared for 19 patients and 9 macaques receiving an allotransplant and 11 macaques receiving a porcine xenotransplant: recipients received chronic immunosuppression. Results: Pigs differ from NHPs and humans by a much lower C‐peptide level (0.42 vs. 1.3 to 2.0 ng/ml, respectively) and a 2‐ to 7‐fold lower C‐peptide response to arginine stimulation. In contrast, NHPs have the highest metabolic demand as evidenced by a high C‐peptide and high C‐peptide response to arginine stimulation; values are about twice higher than in humans. For manufactured islet preparations, these differences are reflected by glucose‐stimulated insulin release (the stimulation index for pigs is 1.5, for humans 3.8, and for macaques 7.7), but not by fractional viability, which was in the same range. The day 75 outcome after transplantation assessed by C‐peptide was similar for allotransplanted humans and NHPs (80 to 90% good graft function) and lower in xenografted NHPs (36% good graft function); gluco‐metabolic parameters were in accordance with graft function, albeit different between species because normoglycemia under exogenous insulin is maintained more aggressively in patients than in NHPs. In xenografted NHPs, the shift in glycemic control with respect to normal values, combined with low values of circulating porcine C‐peptide, resembled more the normal condition in a pig than that in a macaque. Conclusions: The substantially lower glucose‐induced insulin response in adult porcine islet preparations as opposed to islets manufactured from humans or macaques combined with the much higher need for insulin in macaques than in humans creates an imbalance between the metabolic demand and the engrafted islet mass in the pig‐to‐NHP xenograft recipient. Engrafted islet mass is affected by dose, suggesting that a much higher dose level of islets is necessary in the xenogeneic setting than in human or NHP allotransplantation, and pig islets need to be given at a higher dose in macaques than the anticipated effective dose in humans. To cope with differences in metabolic demand and presumably also metabolic dynamics, a liberal regime in supportive exogenous insulin might be essential to achieve long‐term survival. These intrinsic characteristics of the NHP model deserve consideration to optimally design experimental studies with the perspective of translational value of results.     

No in vivo infection of triple immunosuppressed non‐human primates after inoculation with high titers of porcine endogenous retroviruses*

Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) released from pig tissue can infect selected human cells in vitro and therefore represent a safety risk for xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs. Although PERVs infect cells of numerous species in vitro, attempts to establish reliable animal models failed until now. Absence of PERV transmission has been shown in first experimental and clinical xenotransplantations; however, these trials suffered from the absence of long‐term exposure (transplant survival) and profound immunosuppression. Methods: We conducted infectivity studies in rhesus monkeys, pig‐tailed monkeys, and baboons under chronic immunosuppression with cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone, and the rapamycin derivative. These species were selected because they are close to the human species and PERVs can be transmitted in vitro to cells of these species. In addition, the animals received twice, a C1 esterase inhibitor to block complement activation before inoculation of PERV. In order to overcome the complications of microchimerism, animals were inoculated with high titers of cell‐free PERV. In addition, to enable transmission via cell–cell contact, some animals also received virus‐producing cells. For inoculation the primate cell‐adapted strain PERV/5° was used which is characterized by a high infectious titer. Produced on human cells, this virus does not express alpha 1,3 Gal epitopes, does not contain porcine antigens on the viral surface and is therefore less immunogenic in non‐human primates compared with pig cell‐derived virus. Finally, we present evidence that PERV/5° productively infects cells from baboons and rhesus monkeys. Results: In a follow‐up period of 11 months, no antibody production against PERV and no integration of proviral DNA in blood cells was observed. Furthermore, no PERV sequences were detected in the DNA of different organs taken after necropsy. Conclusion: These results indicate that in a primate model, in the presence of chronic immunosuppression, neither the inoculation of cell‐free nor cell‐associated PERV using a virus already adapted to primate cells results in an infection; this is despite the fact that peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the same animals are infectible in vitro.     

Infectious risk and retroviral restriction factors in xenotransplantation

The clinical application of xenotransplantation evokes immunological and microbiological as well as virological challenges. Porcine pathogens that do not show any symptoms in their natural host could exhibit a risk of fatal infections to humans. The presence of pig infectious agents including zoonotic and dissimilar agents should be reduced by specific pathogen free (spf) breeding of donor animals. However, the genetic information of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is integrated in the pig genome and can not be eradicated by spf breeding. The concerns about PERV for human xenograft recipients are based on data of in vitro replication of PERV in some human cell lines. So far, viral replication of PERV has been difficult to demonstrate in non‐human primate cell lines and in preclinical studies of non‐human primates receiving porcine xenografts, respectively. In this regard, natural and effective mechanisms of human and porcine cells counteracting productive infections caused by PERV are important to investigate. Intracellular proteins and components of the innate immune system including endogenous “antiretroviral restriction factors” act at various steps in retroviral replication. The cellular front is composed by several constitutively expressed genes which prevent or suppress retroviral infections. Some of these factors such as members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and the apolipoprotein B mRNA‐editing polypeptide (APOBEC) families as well as tetherin and zinc‐finger antiviral protein (ZAP) could be useful in the management of PERV in xenotransplantation. The risks of infection and the potential role of antiretroviral restriction factors in xenotransplantation are presented in detail.     

Absence of PERV infection in baboons after transgenic porcine liver perfusion

BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation offers great promise to supplement the shortage of human organs available for transplant, but cross-species infection is a substantial concern. Porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), in particular, is thought to pose a risk as a potential pathogen to humans. We evaluated whether PERV is capable of infecting nonhuman primates in vivo after extracorporeal porcine liver perfusion (ECLP). METHODS: Livers were harvested from six human decay-accelerating factor (h-DAF) transgenic piglets and perfused with fresh baboon blood via the portal vein and the hepatic artery. Six healthy baboons underwent direct cross-circulation with the ECLP for 13 to 24 h without immunosuppression. Peripheral blood and bone marrow of baboons were sampled periodically until the baboons were euthanized for the examination of various organ tissue samples. Genomic DNA was extracted from those samples and tested for PERV and pig-specific centromeric DNA sequences by quantitative PCR. Validation showed that the assay could detect one copy of PERV in a background of 150,000 baboon cells, and it was quantitative over a range from 10 to 10(6) copies of PERV. RESULTS: PERV sequences were detected in a high number (4.4 x 10(3)-1.6 x 10(4)/1 microg) in peripheral leukocyte DNA during the initial phases of ECLP, but they disappeared within 1 week. Bone marrow DNA contained PERV sequences longer than peripheral blood, but PERV signals became negative within 1 month. No PERV DNA relapse was seen over the course of this study. Pig-specific centromeric sequences were also detected in the same manner. At 6 months or 1 year after ECLP, no PERV or pig-specific centromeric sequences were detected in the genomic DNA obtained from the following organs: skin, lymph nodes, spleen, liver, pancreas, kidney, heart, and lung. CONCLUSIONS: ECLP did not result in PERV infection or pig-cell microchimerism in baboons.     

Retroviral Restriction Factors and Infectious Risk in Xenotransplantation

The clinical application of xenotransplantation poses immunologic, ethical, and microbiologic challenges. Significant progress has been made in the investigation of each of these areas. Among concerns regarding infectious risks for human xenograft recipients is the identification in swine of infectious agents including porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) that are capable of replication in some human cell lines. PERV replication has, however, been difficult to demonstrate in primate‐derived cell lines and in preclinical studies of non‐human primates receiving porcine xenografts. Endogenous ‘retroviral restriction factors’ are intracellular proteins and components of the innate immune system that act at various steps in retroviral replication. Recent studies suggest that some of these factors may have applications in the management of endogenous retroviruses in xenotransplantation. The risks of PERV infection and the potential role of retroviral restriction factors in xenotransplantation are reviewed in detail.     

A polymerase chain reaction-based protocol for the detection of transmission of pig endogenous retroviruses in pig to human xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation of pig organs and tissues to humans bears the risk of infection of immunosuppressed recipients by porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) released from the transplanted tissue. However, when diagnosing potential PERV transmission, it is essential to exclude microchimerism, i.e., persisting pig cells in analyzed bioptic material of xenotransplanted patients, which give rise to false positive PERV signals. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is so far the only suitable method to diagnose a cross-species transfer of PERV, but the exclusion of microchimerism might be a serious problem because most of the presently employed primer pairs detect PERV sequences with higher sensitivity than primers used for the detection of contaminating pig sequences. METHODS: We designed and evaluated a novel and improved primer set for detection of pig sequences as well as complementing positive control primers on the basis of mitochondrial cytochrome B, an approved marker for phylogenetic studies. We further established primer pairs derived from the long terminal repeat/leader region of PERV isolated from a Duroc German Landrace cross-bred pig and tested their sensitivity in comparison with known PERV- and pig-specific PCR markers. RESULTS: In standard PCR assays, the new cytochrome B-derived primers are at least 10 times more sensitive than the presently used PERV retroviral polymerase gene and mammalian beta-actin primers. When tested in a tissue culture infection model, PERV transmission to human 293 cells can be unambiguously demonstrated, even in the presence of up to 10% pig cells. One of the primer combinations derived from the PERV DuxDL3791 long terminal repeat/leader region amplifies with even lower sensitivity than primers detecting porcine beta-globin, thus permitting the exclusion of microchimerism also via chromosomal loci. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of the new PCR markers allows the proposal of a rigorous setup for the routine detection of PERV transmission after xenotransplantation.     

Lack of cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) to transplant recipients and abattoir workers in contact with pigs

This study investigated the potential transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) to solid-organ transplant recipients and abattoir workers in contact with pigs. Blood samples were obtained from volunteer healthy blood donors (Group A; n=33); pig-breeding farmers who had undergone a liver transplant (Group B; n=14); and pig abattoir workers (Group C; n=49). A second blood sample was obtained 1 year after the first sample from 10 of the abattoir workers (Group D). Tests included investigation for PERV-DNA, PERV-RNA, pig-specific mitochondrial DNA, a quantitative detection of PERV nucleic acids, and antibodies to PERV by two different Western Blots. All polymerase chain reaction and Western Blots assays were negative for PERV or antibodies to PERV. Therefore, the risks of cross-species transmission of PERV appear to be negligible for immunocompetent individuals and allotransplant recipients, even if they are in close and repeated contact with live pigs or pig tissues.     

Safety of xenotransplantation: screening the donor pig and the recipient

Introduction: Xenotransplantation using pig cells and tissues may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms including bacteria, parasites, fungi and viruses to the human recipient and may result in zoonones. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a special risk since PERV‐A and PERV‐B are present in the genome of all pigs and infect human cells. PERV‐C is not present in all pigs and does not infect human cells. However, recombinants between PERV‐A and PERV‐C have been observed in normal pigs characterised by higher replication rates compared with PERV‐A, and they are also able to infect human cells (1). Methods: In the past years numerous assays based on the PCR technology have been developed to screen for the prevalence and expression of PERV and other porcine microorganisms in the donor pig (2). Whereas most microorganisms may be eliminated by designated pathogen‐free breeding, PERVs cannot be removed this way. In addition, assays have been developed to analyse the recipient for the transmission of PERV and other microorganisms, either using PCR methods or immunological assays to detect an antibody production as a result of infection (3). Results: Using these assays, no transmission of PERV as well as of other porcine microorganisms has been observed in first preclinical and clinical xenotransplantations or animal infection experiments. This was especially true for the first clinical transplantation of pig islet cells approved by the New Zealand government (4). Until now there is no susceptible animal model to study PERV transmission and transplantations of porcine cells or organs to non‐human primates as they are associated with limitations concerning the safety aspect, which do not allow transmitting the negative findings to humans (5). Different experimental approaches are under development to reduce the probability of PERV transmission, e.g. the generation of transgenic pigs expressing PERV‐specific siRNA inhibiting PERV expression by RNA interference (6), genotypic selection of pigs with a low prevalence and expression of PERV and neutralising antibodies against the envelope proteins inhibiting PERV infection (7). Conclusion: Investigations of the last years resulted in highly sensitive and specific methods to study PERV and other microorganisms in donor pigs and human recipients of xenotransplants. These methods showed absence of PERV transmission in all investigated cases, both in more than 200 human xenotransplant recipients, mostly recipients of cellular xenotransplants, as well as in non‐human primates and small animals. New technologies under development may further decrease the probability of transmission. References: 1. Denner J. Recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV‐A/C): A new risk for xenotransplantation? Arch Virol 2008; 153: 1421–1426. 2. Kaulitz D, Mihica D, Dorna J, Costa MR, Petersen B, Niemann H, TÖnjes RR, Denner J. Development of sensitive methods for detection of porcine endogenous retrovirus‐C (PERV‐C) in the genome of pigs J Virol Methods 2011; 175(1): 60–65. 3. Denner, J. Infectious risk in xenotransplantation – what post‐transplant screening for the human recipient? Xenotransplantation 2011; 18(3): 151–157. 4. Wynyard S, Garkavenko O, Nathu D, Denner J, Elliott R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand, submitted. 5. Mattiuzzo G, Takeuchi Y. Suboptimal porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in non‐human primate cells: implication for preclinical xenotransplantation. PLoS One 2010; 5(10): e13203. 6. Semaan M, Kaulitz D, Petersen B, Niemann H, Denner J. Long‐term effects of PERV‐specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation 2012; 19(2): 112–21. 7. Kaulitz D, Fiebig U, Eschricht M, Wurzbacher C, Kurth R, Denner J. Generation of neutralising antibodies against porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Virology 2011; 411(1): 78–86.