A comparative study of the prognosis for Japanese patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia or BOOP based on histopathologic subsets]

We explored the prognosis for 123 patients with either idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) or bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP). All patients underwent either open lung biopsy or thoracoscopic lung biopsy procedures. The histopathologic diagnosis of IIP included patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and desquamative interstitial pneumonia with respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease. The prognosis was poorest for patients with a histologic diagnosis of UIP, and excellent for those who received a diagnosis of BOOP. Although the prognosis is generally considered to be good for patients with NSIP, some NSIP patients in our study died. Histopathologic diagnosis based on surgical lung biopsy is useful in evaluating the prognosis for patients with IIP.     

BAL findings in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which has the histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), is a progressive interstitial lung disease with a poor prognosis. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias with a histological pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) have a better prognosis than UIP, and may present with a clinical picture identical to IPF. The authors hypothesised that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings may distinguish between UIP and NSIP, and have prognostic value within disease subgroups. BAL findings were studied retrospectively in 54 patients with histologically proven (surgical biopsy) idiopathic UIP (n=35) or fibrotic NSIP (n=19), all presenting clinically as IPF. These findings were also compared with the BAL profile of patients with other categories of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. BAL total and differential cell counts did not differ between the two groups. Survival was better in NSIP. In neither group were BAL findings predictive of survival or changes in lung function at 1 yr, even after adjustment for disease severity, smoking and treatment. BAL differential counts in fibrotic NSIP differed from respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease, but not from desquamative interstitial pneumonia or cellular NSIP. The authors conclude that bronchoalveolar lavage findings do not discriminate between usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in patients presenting with clinical features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and have no prognostic value, once the distinction between the two has been made histologically.     

Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: lung manifestation of undifferentiated connective tissue disease?

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Consensus Classification panel identified the clinical entity idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) as a provisional diagnosis and recommended further study. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that idiopathic NSIP is an autoimmune disease and the lung manifestation of undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), a recently described, distinct entity. METHODS: We studied 28 consecutive patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) enrolled in the University of California, San Francisco Interstitial Lung Disease Center who met prespecified criteria for UCTD, as follows: at least one clinical manifestation of connective tissue disease, serologic evidence of systemic inflammation in the absence of clinical infection, and absence of sufficient American College of Rheumatology criteria for another connective tissue disease. Medical record reviews, evaluation of radiographs, and scoring of lung biopsies were performed. The control group consisted of all other patients (n = 47) with IIP who did not meet the UCTD criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients with UCTD were more likely to be women, younger, and nonsmokers than the IIP control subjects. Compared with the control group, patients with UCTD-ILD were significantly more likely to have ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and NSIP pattern on biopsy, and less likely to have honeycombing on HRCT or usual interstitial pneumonia on biopsy. At our center, the majority of patients classified as idiopathic NSIP (88%) met the criteria for UCTD. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients diagnosed with idiopathic NSIP meet the case definition of UCTD. Furthermore, these results show that the clinical entity idiopathic NSIP is different from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and appears to be an autoimmune disease.     

非特异性间质性肺炎

非特异性间质性肺炎,是特发性间质性肺炎中继特发性肺间质纤维化后最常见的类型,它在流行病学、发病机制、临床表现、影像学特点、病理表现及预后等方面都有其自身特点,尤其是预后远较特发性肺间质纤维化好。本文将就目前对于NSIP的认识做一综述。     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a real clinical entity?

Based on the current multidisciplinary classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) organized by ATS/ERS, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is considered as one type of IIP. An incidence of idiopathic NSIP is relatively small and possesses clinical features that are different than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Because there is little evidence of a long-term prognosis in patients with NSIP, some of them have an unfavorable prognosis similar to IPF/UIP. We review the significance of prognostic factors that have been reported in patients with IPF/UIP by applying them to patients with NSIP. The association with collagen vascular diseases focuses on etiologic background. Finally, the article discusses whether NSIP could be an early lesion of UIP based on the reported evidence and our own professional experiences.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) represents one histologic subtype of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). NSIP is typified by temporal homogeneity and less profusion of fibroblastic foci than is seen with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), the most common IIP. Clinically patients with NSIP present with similar symptoms (cough and dyspnea) when compared to patients with UIP. The duration of these symptoms prior to presentation is variable. The finding of fever may be more common in NSIP and clubbing may be more common in UIP; however, both findings can be seen in either UIP or NSIP. Physiological findings typically demonstrate a restrictive ventilatory defect with decreased gas transfer; little difference exists between UIP and NSIP. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans are more likely to show honeycombing with UIP and a ground-glass pattern with NSIP, however, either of these findings can be seen with UIP or NSIP. The most striking differential feature between NSIP and UIP is the markedly better prognosis for patients with NSIP, a finding that cannot be explained by baseline differences in physiology or radiographic features. In this article we explore the clinical, physiological, and radiographic features of NSIP. We also review available information regarding response to therapy and prognosis.     

Steroid treatment based on the findings of transbronchial biopsy in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

This study was performed to find the rationale for administering steroids to patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which was unlikely to be usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) but was not surgically biopsied. Among IIP patients in the file of the departments, nine patients who met the following criteria were selected for this study ("non-UIP" group): 1) transbronchial lung biopsy showed dense mononuclear cell infiltration in thickened alveolar septa; 2) chest radiograph and computed tomography showed irregular linear, reticular or ground-glass opacities with alveolar consolidation without honeycombing in the lung base; and 3) spirometry was performed before and after steroid therapy. Ten patients with pathologically confirmed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia ("NSIP" group) were also selected for the comparison. Baseline values and percentage increase of vital capacity (VC) after steroid therapy were plotted. Steroids improved VC in both groups of patients. After 1 yr of steroid therapy, percentage increase of VC in "non-UIP" was 28.8+/-7.7%, which was not significantly different from that in NSIP (30.0+/-11.7%). One "non-UIP" patient and one NSIP patient died after 6.4 and 4.3 yrs of follow-up, respectively. Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia presenting cellular interstitial pneumonia in transbronchial lung biopsy, in addition to radiographic findings not typical for usual interstitial pneumonia, could expect a beneficial effect of steroids without undergoing surgical biopsy.     

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in patients with interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND: Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) are circulating antibodies that bind to endothelial antigens and induce endothelial cell damage. AECA have been detected in patients with collagen vascular disease (CVD) and their presence is associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in cases of CVD. However, the prevalence of AECA in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is not known. METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of AECA in patients with IIPs. We also examined whether the expression of AECA differed among the histologic subgroups usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and compared the values with those of CVD-associated ILD (CVD-ILD). Twenty patients with IIPs and 24 patients with CVD-ILD were studied. Serum samples were examined for AECA by cellular enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Values are expressed as ELISA ratios (ER). RESULTS: All sera from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)/UIP were negative for AECA, whereas 5 out of 10 with idiopathic NSIP, 5 out of 14 with CVD-UIP and 4 out of 10 with CVD-NSIP tested positive (p<0.05). ER values were significantly lower in patients with IPF/UIP than idiopathic NSIP, CVD-UIP or CVD-NSIP (p<0.05). Among idiopathic NSIP, CVD-NSIP and CVD-UIP patients, the ER values did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Among IIP patients, only those with idiopathic NSIP, not IPF/UIP, tested positive for AECA. The prevalence of AECA in idiopathic NSIP patients was similar to that in CVD-ILD patients. These results may provide important information to understand the distinct pathophysiology of each form of IIPs.     

Cyclosporin A treatment of interstitial pneumonia]

To assist in making prognoses for patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP) who were treated with cyclosporin A (CsA), we conducted a review of forty-nine patients (32 men and 17 women with a mean age of 62 yrs) with progressive IP during the period from 1997 through 2001. All patients were steroid-resistant or acutely exacerbated cases. They received a low dosage of CsA (100-130 mg/day) combined with corticosteroids. Before and after the CsA therapy, blood gas analysis and HRCT scans were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or autopsy for a histopathological evaluation. Among the 49 patients with IP, the documented underlying systemic diseases were of unknown etiology (IPF or IIP) in 26 and were collagen vascular diseases (CVD) in 23. The chest CT pattern and underlying systemic diseases of IP were classified as a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern/IPF in 16 cases, a non-UIP pattern/IIP in 10 cases, a UIP pattern/CVD in 7 cases, and a non-UIP pattern/CVD in 16 cases. The prognoses after CsA treatment were improved or unchanged in 27% of cases with a UIP pattern/IPF, 78% of cases with a non-UIP pattern/IIP, 71% of cases with a UIP pattern/CVD and 75% of cases with a non-UIP pattern/CVD; deteriorated in 73%, 22%, 29% and 25% of cases, respectively, with these patterns and underlying diseases. At present, four out of thirteen (31%) patients with acute exacerbation of UIP pattern/IPF have survived for four to twelve months (mean: 7.5 months). Four patients revealed re-exacerbation of IP after the dose of CsA was tapered. Among the 25 patients with IP, the histopathological patterns of IP were classified as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in 10 cases, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in 14 cases (group I, 2; group II, 5; group III, 7) and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) in 1 case. The prognoses were improved or unchanged in all cases of NSIP group I, in 80% of cases with NSIP group II, in 29% of cases of NSIP group III and in 20% of cases of UIP; and deteriorated in the case of DAD, in 80% of cases of UIP, in 71% of cases of NSIP group III, and in 20% of cases of NSIP group II. It should be emphasized that CsA combined with corticosteroids may be effective for the treatment of steroid-resistant or acute exacerbation cases of IP. Further studies are required to determine long-term outcome with this treatment.     

Histopathologic variability in usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonias.

Findings of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) are important in categorizing patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). We investigated whether histologic variability would be evident in SLB specimens from multiple lobes in patients with IIP. SLBs from 168 patients, 109 of whom had multiple lobes biopsied, were reviewed by three pathologists. A diagnosis was assigned to each lobe. A different diagnosis was found between lobes in 26% of the patients. Patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in all lobes were categorized as concordant for UIP (n = 51) and those with UIP in at least one lobe were categorized as discordant for UIP (n = 28). Patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in all lobes were categorized as having fibrotic (n = 25) or cellular NSIP (n = 5). No consistent distribution of lobar histology was noted. Patients concordant for UIP were older (63 +/- 9 [mean +/- SD] yr; p < 0.05 as compared with all other groups) than those discordant for UIP (57 +/- 12 yr) or with fibrotic NSIP (56 +/- 11 yr) or cellular NSIP (50 +/- 9 yr). Semiquantitative high-resolution computed tomography demonstrated a varied profusion of fibrosis (p < 0.05 for all group comparisons), with more fibrosis in concordant UIP (2.13 +/- 0.62) than in discordant UIP (1.42 +/- 0.73), fibrotic NSIP (0.83 +/- 0.58), or cellular NSIP (0.44 +/- 0.42). Survival was better for patients with NSIP than for those in both UIP groups (p < 0.001), although survival in the two UIP groups was comparable (p = 0.16). Lobar histologic variability is frequent in patients with IIP, patients with a histologic pattern of UIP in any lobe should be classified as having UIP.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a provisional category of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) represent a complex group of relatively rare entities with similar clinical, vaguely similar radiographic and differing histologic features. The recent international multidisciplinary consensus statement produced by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society aiming to standardize the classification of IIP recognizes nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) as a provisional category. While not representing a single disease, but rather a collection of pathologic processes with similar histomorphology, NSIP has been a great source of confusion for pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. RECENT FINDINGS: Lacking diagnostic clinical or radiographic features, NSIP is an IIP with recognizable and reproducible morphologic patterns different from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-pattern as well as other disease patterns. And while overlap with UIP-pattern can be seen in individuals with multiple biopsy samples, those with either cellular or fibrosing variants of NSIP have a better prognosis than UIP-pattern patients. SUMMARY: A morphologic diagnosis of NSIP-pattern alerts the clinician to a wide spectrum of potential clinical possibilities and enables researchers to study both this fibrosing interstitial pneumonia pattern and the more common and deadly UIP-pattern separately. Thus, this provisional category is useful to both clinicians and researchers.     

A recurrent case of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia histologically diagnosed as nonspecific interstitial pneumonia group 1]

A 59-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnea. Chest radiography showed infiltration and consolidation in both lung fields. He was clinically diagnosed as having idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), and histological examination of a thoracoscopic lung biopsy specimen showed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) group 1. Corticosteroid therapy had previously been effective, but about 1 year later the disease recurred. The patient's clinical condition was very similar to the first episode, and is improving in response to the same treatment again. Although it is generally accepted that patients with IIP diagnosed histologically as NSIP have a good prognosis, it should be remembered that recurrence is possible, even in patients with group 1.     

Classification and recent advances in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a heterogeneous group of diseases comprising acute interstitial pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and usual interstitial pneumonia (IPF/UIP). We review the clinicopathological spectrum of IIP and introduce recent advances in classification, treatment, and prognosis. BOOP can be clinically categorized as an interstitial pneumonia, though prominent granulation tufts are seen in the airspaces. Though differences between the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and other lips can be histopathologically clarified, the focus of clinical research on NSIP is differentiation from BOOP, or from IPF and UIP. IIP can be categorized into two groups: groups with acute or subacute lung injuries or fibrosis, such as in acute interstitial pneumonia, BOOP and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and groups with chronic injuries or fibrosis, such as IPF/UIP. This classification accords well with the maturity of fibrosis, CT findings, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell findings, and prognosis. The most critical problem is the treatment of IPF/UIP, because of its high mortality.     

Bronchoalveolar lavage in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in differentiating usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) from non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and in predicting the prognosis in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). A retrospective review of 122 patients (age 58+/-8 years, 70 male) with UIP (n=87) and NSIP (n=35) was carried out. Prior to surgical lung biopsy, all of them underwent BAL and high-resolution-computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. Neutrophil count in BAL fluid was higher in UIP (7.0%) than NSIP (3.0%) (P=0.027). In contrast, BAL lymphocyte count was significantly higher in NSIP (29.0%) than UIP (5.5%) (P<0.0001). In 62 patients whose HRCT findings were atypical for UIP, BAL lymphocytosis was more frequently observed in NSIP (20/33) than UIP (4/29) (P<0.001) and the absence of BAL lymphocytosis suggested a diagnosis of UIP rather than NSIP (odds ratio 12.7, P<0.001). Pathologic diagnosis of NSIP was the only independent factor predicting a longer survival of our patients (median follow-up 21 months) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.035, P=0.005). When NSIP was not included in the survival analysis, higher BAL lymphocyte count was the only independent predictor of a longer survival (HR 0.909, P=0.029). BAL is an useful non-invasive tool in fibrotic IIP, not only for excluding a variety of specific non-IIP diseases but also for narrowing the differential diagnosis and predicting the prognosis in the absence of the histopathologic diagnosis.     

Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and from ordinary interstitial pneumonia]

We studied cell findings in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of 13 patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and 20 with ordinary interstitial pneumonia (UIP). NSIP and UIP were difficult to distinguish by high-resolution CT. Surgical lung biopsies were performed in all patients. We divided the patients with NSIP and UIP into 4 groups, a group of idiopathic NSIP (idiopathic NSIP), a group of NSIP patients associated with collagen vascular disease (CVD NSIP), a group of idiopathic UIP patients (idiopathic UIP) and a group of UIP patients associated with collagen vascular disease (CVD UIP). We then examined the differences in BALF cell findings between these groups. The percentage of lymphocytes in BALF was higher in idiopathic NSIP and CVD NSIP than in the healthy control. The percentage of alveolar macrophages was lower and the percentage of lymphocytes was higher in CVD NSIP than in idiopathic UIP. The CD4/CD8 ratio in BALF of idiopathic NSIP was lower than with idiopathic UIP. It is important that NSIP be distinguished from UIP clinically, and our results suggest that BALF cell findings may be useful for making this distinction.     

High-BAL fluid concentrations of RANTES in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia compared with usual interstitial pneumonia

Chemokines such as regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, monocyte inflammatory protein (MIP)-lalpha have been reported to play an important role in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung diseases. Among idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) has elevated percentages of Lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid compared with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). These chemokines are candidate mediators for lymphocyte attraction to the lung in NSIR Therefore, we measured the BAL fluid levels of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP1-alpha in 15 patients with idiopathic NSIP, 20 with idiopathic UIP, 22 with sarcoidosis and 12 healthy volunteers to evaluate the contribution of these chemokines using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The levels of RANTES in BAL fluid were significantly higher in patients with NSIP compared with healthy volunteers (P < 0.01), UIP and sarcoidosis (P < 0.05). In MCP-1, the levels in BAL fluid of NSIP and UIP patients were significantly elevated compared with healthy volunteers and sarcoidosis patients (P < 0.01). These results suggest that RANTES and MCP-1 in BAL fluid may play an important role in inflammatory cell recruitment to the lung in idiopathic NSIP as well as other interstitial lung diseases.     

Histopathologic subsets of fibrosing alveolitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and their relationship to outcome

Fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis (FASSc) has a better prognosis than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In view of recent reports that idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) has a better prognosis than idiopathic usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), we classified histologic appearances of surgical lung biopsies performed in 80 patients with FASSc. NSIP (n = 62, 77.5%), subcategorized as cellular NSIP (n = 15) and fibrotic NSIP (n = 47) was much more prevalent than UIP (n = 6), end-stage lung disease (ESL, n = 6), or other patterns (n = 6). There were 25 deaths (NSIP 16/62, 26%; UIP/ESL 6/12, 50%). Five-year survival differed little between NSIP (91%) and UIP/ESL (82%); mortality was associated with lower initial carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DL(CO)) and FVC levels (p = 0.004 and p = 0.007, respectively). Survival and serial FVC and DL(CO) trends did not differ between cellular and fibrotic NSIP. Increased mortality in NSIP was associated with lower initial DL(CO) levels (p = 0.04), higher BAL eosinophil levels (p = 0.03), and deterioration in DL(CO) levels during the next 3 years (p < 0.005). We conclude that NSIP is the histopathologic pattern in most patients with FASSc. However, outcome is linked more strongly to disease severity at presentation and serial DL(CO) trends than to histopathologic findings.     

The appearance of S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells and the distribution of lymphocyte subsets in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a progressive interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology. We investigated dendritic cells in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) immunohistochemically, using anti-S-100 protein antibody and anti-HLA-DR antibody and also evaluated the relationship between the distribution of S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells (S- 100 DCs) and the lymphocytic subsets in the lung tissue of NSIP. Fifteen patients with the pathological diagnosis of idiopathic NSIP and six patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were recruited into this study. Many S-100 DCs were observed in all the cases of idiopathic NSIP but S-100 DCs were not recognized in UIP cases invariably. In the mirror section method, most S-100 DCs showed a positive reaction of anti-HLA-DR antibody but a negative reaction for anti-CD1a antibody. CD8 and CD4 positive lymphocytes were infiltrated diffusely around S-100 DCs. It was demonstrated that the infiltration of CD8 positive lymphocytes predominated in the fibrosing areas and lymphoid follicles around S-100 DCs more so than CD4 positive lymphocytes.We speculate that the pathogenesis of NSIP is different from UIP and that DC and T cell-mediated immune mechanisms may play a role in the development and perpetuation of NSIP.     

Cyclosporin treatment in steroid-resistant and acutely exacerbated interstitial pneumonia

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PATIENTS: We reviewed 33 patients (23 males and 10 females with a mean age of 62.5 years) with histologically-proven progressive IP who were treated with CsA. All patients had corticosteroid-resistant IP or developed acute exacerbation of IP in their courses. RESULTS: The underlying systemic diseases were: idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) in 19 patients, and collagen vascular diseases (CVDs) in 14. The histopathological patterns and underlying diseases of IP were classified as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in 10 patients, cellular-nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)/IIPs in 3, fibrotic-NSIP/IIPs in 5, organizing pneumonia (OP)/IIP in 1, UIP/CVDs in 4, cellular-NSIP/CVDs in 7, fibrotic-NSIP/CVDs in 2, and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD)/CVD in 1, respectively. They received a low dosage of CsA combined with corticosteroids. The prognoses after treatment with CsA were well correlated with histopathological patterns. Cellular-NSIP and OP showed better prognoses than fibrotic-NSIP, UIP or DAD. In addition, CVDs had better prognoses than IIPs, when compared on the basis of the same histopathological patterns. Furthermore, the prognoses in the CsA-treated group were significantly better than in those without CsA treatment in regard to acute exacerbation of UIP/IPF. CONCLUSIONS: CsA combined with corticosteroids may be an efficacious treatment for corticosteroid-resistant IP and for acute exacerbation of IPF.     

Prognostic implications of histologic patterns in multiple surgical lung biopsies from patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of histologic discordance in multiple lung biopsy specimens obtained from patients investigated for suspected cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: and results: Between 1984 and 2001, 64 patients undergoing investigation for CFA/IPF were identified in whom multiple biopsies were performed that showed either a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). These cases were classified into three groups: concordant UIP-UIP (n = 25, 39.1%), discordant UIP-NSIP (n = 8,12.5%), and concordant NSIP-NSIP (n = 31, 48.4%). The discordant UIP group had survival, clinical, and physiologic features similar to those of the concordant UIP group, and prognosis in both concordant and discordant UIP groups was significantly worse than that of the concordant NSIP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). The age of the concordant UIP group was higher than that of the concordant NSIP group, with the mean age of the discordant group being intermediate. There were no significant differences among the three groups in smoking history, duration of dyspnea, presence or absence of crackles, FVC, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, or PaO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with discordant UIP-NSIP results on multiple biopsies show clinical behavior similar to those with concordant UIP-UIP and should be regarded as having CFA/IPF in the correct clinical context, rather than "idiopathic NSIP" for the purposes of management. Multiple biopsies should be considered in all patients in order to improve the prognostic information provided by lung biopsy.