Weight Loss and Comorbidity Resolution 3 Years After Bariatric Surgery—an Indian Perspective

Introduction

Bariatric surgery has seen a sharp rise in India in the last decade. India is one of the 10 most obese nations of the world, ranking second in number of type 2 diabetics.

Aims

To evaluate clinical outcomes of bariatric surgery after 3 years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, co-morbidity resolution, complaints of gastroesophageal reflux disease and weight regain.

Methodology

All patients who underwent bariatric surgery from January to December 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were included in the study. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively maintained on Microsoft Office Excel and analyzed statistically.

Results

One hundred seventy-eight patients (157 lap. sleeve gastrectomy and 21 patients lap. RYGB) completed 3 years of follow-up. In the LSG group, patients had a pre-operative BMI 44.8?±?8.33 kg/sq. m (mean ± S.D.) and excess body weight 52.3?±?23.0 kg. In the RYGB group, pre-operative BMI was 42.7?±?8.82 kg/sq. m and excess body weight 45?±?18.7 kg. In the LSG group, % excess weight loss (EWL) at 1 year was 87.6?±?24.4% and 3 years was 71.8?±?26.7%. In the RYGB group, % EWL at 1 year was 97.2?±?27.3% and at 3 years was 85.8?±?25.3%. Diabetes resolution was seen in 32 (80%) in LSG group and 11 (91.7%) in RYGB group (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4).

Conclusion

Our study reflects that there is no statistically significant difference between outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in terms of weight loss and diabetes resolution at 3 years.

     

Investigating Nutritional Deficiencies in a Group of Patients 3 Years Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage procedure has shown to be effective in achieving significant weight loss and resolving obesity-related co-morbidities. However, its nutrition consequences have not been extensively explored. This study aims to investigate weight loss and evolution of nutritional deficiencies in a group of patients 3 years post LSG.

Methods

Retrospective data of a group of patients, 3 years following LSG as a stand-alone procedure was collected. Data included anthropometry, nutritional markers (hemoglobin, iron studies, folate, calcium, iPTH, vitamins D, and B₁₂), and compliancy with supplementations.

Results

Ninety-one patients (male/female; 28:63), aged 51.9?±?11.4 years with a BMI of 42.8?±?6.1 kg/m² were identified to be 3 years post LSG. Percentage of weight loss at 1 and 3 years post-operatively was 29.8?±?7.0 and 25.9?±?8.8 %, respectively. Pre-operatively, the abnormalities included low hemoglobin (4 %), ferritin (6 %), vitamin B₁₂ (1 %), vitamin D (46 %), and elevated iPTH (25 %). At 3 years post-operatively, the abnormal laboratory values included low hemoglobin (14 % females, P?=?0.021), ferritin (24 %, P?=?0.011), vitamin D (20 %, P?=?0.018), and elevated iPTH (17 %, P?=?0.010). Compliancy with multivitamin supplementation was noted in 66 % of patients.

Conclusion

In these patients, LSG resulted in pronounced weight loss at 1 year post-operatively, and most of this was maintained at 3 years. Nutritional deficiencies are prevalent among patients prior to bariatric surgery. These deficiencies may persist or exacerbate post-operatively. Routine nutrition monitoring and supplementations are essential to prevent and treat these deficiencies.

     

The Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Obesity-Related Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Background

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) is a significant clinical problem and is characterized by high recurrence rate compared with non-HTG-AP. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on obesity-related HTG-AP.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with obesity-related HTG-AP were admitted to our hospital and treated with the conventional therapy or LSG surgery according to the wishes of patients. Clinical data and the recurrence rate of AP were collected at baseline and at four different time points (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) after the treatments for all patients.

Results

Of the 29 patients, 28 patients (19 patients with conventional therapy and 9 patients with LSG surgery) completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical data and the severity scores of AP were comparable at baseline when the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The LSG group experienced a large weight loss (percent total weight loss, 26.87?±?1.44%; percent excess weight loss, 79.56?±?1.37%) and triglyceride reduction (from 15.77?±?1.02 to 1.36?±?0.09 mmol/L), and no recurrence was observed at 12 months after the surgery. In the conventional treatment group, however, body weight was not changed although triglyceride was significantly decreased (from 17.34?±?1.29 to 8.25?±?1.12 mmol/L), and more importantly, 47.4% of the patients had at least one recurrence of AP in 12 months after the treatment.

Conclusions

LSG might be an effective way to cure obesity-related HTG-induced AP since it prevents the recurrence of this disease. Further randomized studies will be needed to standardize this way of treatment.

     

Morbidity Rates and Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass,Sleeve Gastrectomy,and Adjustable Gastric Banding in Patients Older Than 60 Years old: Which Procedure to Choose?

Background

As life expectancy increases, more elderly patients fit into the criteria for bariatric procedures. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in patients older than 60.

Material and Methods

Between January 2005 and December 2013, 68 LAGB, 73 LSG, and 212 RYGB patients were 60 years or older at the time of primary procedure. A retrospective review was performed in these patients.

Results

Mean age and body mass index (BMI) was 62.7?±?2.2, 64.1?±?2.9, and 62.6?±?2.3 years and 42.7?±?5.6, 44.0?±?7.0, and 45.2?±?6.7 kg/m² for LAGB, LSG, and RYGB at the time of procedure, respectively.Seven (10.3 %) patients from the LAGB, 3 (4.1 %) from the LSG, and 29 (13.8 %) from the RYGB group required readmissions. Reoperation rate was 10.3, 1.4, and 9.5 % in LAGB, LSG, and RYGB, respectively. The difference in reoperation rates was statistically significant (p?<?0.03) while that in readmission rates was not (p?>?0.58). Procedure-related mortality rate was 1.4 % in the RYGB group, while no mortality was observed in LSG and LAGB groups. At 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively, mean percentage of excess weight loss were highest in the RYGB group, followed by LSG and LAGB group (p?<?0.01). Mean number of comorbidities at the last follow-up significantly decreased in LSG and RYGB patients.

Conclusions

LSG showed the lowest readmission and reoperation rate, and RYGB patients had the highest mortality rate. Weight loss and comorbidity resolution were effectively achieved in RYGB and LSG patients.

     

Glycemic Control after Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has weight-independent effects on glycemia in obese type 2 diabetic patients, whereas sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is less well characterized. This study aims to compare early weight-independent and later weight-dependent glycemic effects of LRYGB and LSG.

Methods

Eighteen LRYGB and 15 LSG patients were included in the study. Glucose, insulin, GLP-1, and GIP levels were monitored during a modified 30 g oral glucose tolerance test before surgery and 2 days, 3 weeks, and 12 months after surgery. Patients self-monitored glucose levels 2 weeks before and after surgery.

Results

Postoperative fasting blood glucose decreased similarly in both groups (LRYGB vs. SG; baseline—8.1?±?0.6 vs. 8.2?±?0.4 mmol/l, 2 days—7.8?±?0.5 vs. 7.4?±?0.3 mmol/l, 3 weeks—6.6?±?0.4 vs. 6.6?±?0.3 mmol/l, respectively, P <?0.01 vs. baseline for both groups; 12 months—6.6?±?0.4 vs. 5.9?±?0.4, respectively, P <?0.05 for LRYGB and P <?0.001 for LSG vs. baseline, P =?ns between the groups at all times). LSG, but not LRYGB, showed increased peak insulin levels 2 days postoperatively (mean?±?SEM; LSG +?58?±?14%, P <?0.01; LRYGB ??8?±?17%, P =?ns). GLP-1 levels increased similarly at 2 days, but were higher in LRYGB at 3 weeks (AUC; 7525?±?1258 vs. 4779?±?712 pmol?×?min, respectively, P <?0.05). GIP levels did not differ. Body mass index (BMI) decreased more after LRYGB than LSG (??10.1?±?0.9 vs. ??7.9?±?0.5 kg/m², respectively, P <?0.05).

Conclusion

LRYGB and LSG show very similar effects on glycemic control, despite lower GLP-1 levels and inferior BMI decrease after LSG.

     

Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in 541 Consecutive Patients with Low Baseline Body Mass Index (30–35 kg/m<Superscript>2</Superscript>)

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the leading bariatric procedure and targets, among other obesity classes, patients with BMI 30–35 kg/m², which are reaching alarming proportions.

Methods

Between February 2010 and August 2015, data on 541 consecutive patients with BMI 30–35 kg/m² undergoing LSG were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

Mean age was 32?±?8 years (13–65) and 419 (77.4 %) were women. Preoperative weight was 92.0?±?8.8 kg (65–121) and BMI was 32.6?±?1.5 kg/m² (30–35). Comorbidities were detected in 210 (39 %) patients. Operative time was 74?±?12 min (40–110) and postoperative stay was 1.7?±?0.22 days (1–3). There were no deaths, leaks, abscesses or strictures and the rate of hemorrhage was 1.2 %. At 1 year, 98 % were followed and BMI decreased to 24.7?±?1.6, the percentage of total weight loss (% TWL) was 24.1?±?4.7 while the percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) reached 106.1?±?24.1. At 5 years, 76 % of followed patients achieved a ≥50 % EBMIL.

Conclusion

With appropriate surgical expertise, LSG in patients with BMI 30–35 kg/m² achieved excellent outcomes with a zero fistula rate.

     

Portion Control Eating—a Determinant of Bariatric Outcomes

Introduction

Bariatric surgery leads to significant weight loss but the results vary. Application of dietary principles like portion-controlled eating leads to greater weight loss and fewer complications.

Aims

To evaluate the improvement in weight loss outcomes by incorporating portion-controlled eating behavior in postbariatric patients.

Methods

All patients who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2012 to December 2013 were included in the study. Portion-controlled eating behavior was incorporated in the post-bariatric nutritional protocol. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively maintained on Microsoft Office Excel and analyzed statistically.

Results

Three hundred and seventy-two (89.6%) underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), while 43 (10.4%) underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). In the LSG group, lowest (nadir) BMI was 28.99?±?5.6 kg/m² and % Excess weight loss (EWL) was 87.3?±?27.2%, achieved between 1 and 2 years. In the RYGB group, lowest (nadir) BMI was 27.5?±?12.09 kg/m and % EWL was 94.32?±?33.12%. Surgical failure (less than 50% EWL) were 10 (3.27%) in the LSG group and 1 (3%) in the RYGB group. There were no leaks reported in our study.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the importance of postoperative nutritional interventions like portion-controlled eating for successful bariatric outcome.

     

Incidence,Indications, and Predictive Factors for ICU Admission in Elderly,High-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Obesity affects the elderly, leading to increased prevalence of age- and obesity-associated comorbidities. There are no guidelines for indications and risk assessment for the elderly undergoing bariatric surgery.

Objectives

To determine the incidence, indications, and outcomes of planned ICU admission in elderly, high-risk patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and to assess if preoperative risk factors for planned postoperative ICU admission in elderly patients undergoing LSG could be predicted preoperatively.

Methods

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all patients aged ≥?60 years who underwent LSG (2011–2016) at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar.

Results

We followed up 58 patients aged 60–75 years for 28?±?17 months. About 77.6% of patients were in the intermediate-risk group of the Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS). Fourteen patients (24%) required ICU admission for 2?±?1.2 days; all patients belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III class and intermediate to high risk on OS-MRS. There were no reported mortalities. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 49?±?10.6 to 37.6?±?10.1 kg/m². The number of patient comorbidities (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03–1.99) and the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.92–31.68) were associated with planned ICU admission.

Conclusion

Elderly patients undergoing LSG usually have excellent postoperative course despite the associated high risk and the required ICU admission. The number of comorbidities, diagnosis of OSA, and ASA score are possible clinically significant predictive factors for the need of post-LSG ICU admission.

     

Fully Ambulatory Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 328 Consecutive Patients in a Single Tertiary Bariatric Center

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming one of the most popular bariatric procedures because of its short operative time, good resolution of comorbidities, excellent weight loss, and low complications rate. However, the safety of LSG as a day-surgery procedure has not yet been widely documented.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected bariatric database, in a single institution, between August 2012 and February 2015, yielded 980 patients who underwent LSG; 328 patients (33.5 %) responded to established criteria and were operated on a 1-day surgery basis (length of stay?<?12 h).

Results

There were 258 (78 %) primary LSG and 70 revisional LSG (22 %) performed on 284 females and 44 males, with a mean age (±SD) of 38?±?9 years. Mean (±SD) preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 45?±?6 kg/m². Operative time was 68?±?17 min (mean?±?SD). There were no deaths. A total of 322 patients (98.2 %) were discharged home the day of surgery. There were 6 (1.8 %) unplanned overnight hospitalization, and 28 patients (8.5 %) were readmitted between days 1 and 30. Most patients (25/34, 73 %) were hospitalized for minor problems, such as pain, nausea, and/or vomiting. There were two cases of (0.6 %) gastric staple line leaks, three (0.9 %) of intra-abdominal hematomas, two (0.6 %) of pneumonia, one (0.3 %) of acute pancreatitis, and one (0.3 %) of urinary tract infection. All patients recovered well.

Conclusions

LSG can be performed as an outpatient procedure in selected patients, with acceptable results in terms of retention, readmission, and complication rates.

     

Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Absorbable Monofilament,Barbed Suture,Fibrin Glue,or Nothing? Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with serious complications, such as staple line (SL) leaks and bleeding. In order to prevent the occurrence of these complications, surgeons have advocated the need to strengthen the staple line. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare the efficacy of three different ways of strengthening of the SL in LSG in preventing surgical post-operative complications.

Methods

Between April 2012 and December 2014, 600 patients (pts) scheduled for LSG were prospectively randomized into groups without SL reinforcement (group A) or with SL reinforcement including fibrin glue coverage (group B), or oversewn SL with imbricating absorbable (Monocryl?; group C) or barbed (V lock®) running suture (group D). Primary endpoints were post-operative leaks, bleeding, and stenosis, while secondary outcomes consisted of the time to perform the staple line reinforcement (SLR) and total operative time.

Results

Mean SLR operative time was lower for group B (3.4?±?1.3 min) compared with that for groups C (26.8?±?8.5 min) and D (21.1?±?8.4 min) (p?<?0.0001). Mean total operative time was 100.7?±?16.4 min (group A), 104.4?±?22.1 min (group B), 126.2?±?18.9 min (group C), and 124.6?±?22.8 (group D) (p?<?0.0001). Post-operative leaks, bleeding, and stenosis were recorded in 14 pts (2.3 %), 5 pts (0.8 %), and 7 pts (1.1 %), respectively, without statistical difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that SLR during LSG, with an imbricating or non-imbricating running suture or with fibrin glue, is an unrewarding surgical act with the sole effect of prolonging the operative time.

     

Increased Metabolic Benefit for Obese,Elderly Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy

Purpose

We sought to assess outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in a cohort of morbidly obese, elderly patients.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review was conducted of all patients age 60 years or greater undergoing LSG or LRYGB at our institution between 2007 and 2014.

Results

A total of 134 patients who underwent LSG (n = 65) or LRYGB (n = 69) were identified. Groups were similar with respect to age (64 years, range 60–75 years), BMI (44.0 ± 6.1), and ASA score (91% ≥ ASA 3). There were no differences in major post-operative complications (3, 4.7% LSG vs 4, 5.8% LRYGB, p = 0.75). Median follow-up was 39 months (IQR 14–64 months) with no patients lost to follow-up. Patients undergoing LRYGB had improvement in each of diabetes mellitus 2 (DM2), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HL), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as a significant decrease in insulin use (16/47, 34.0% pre-operatively vs 7/47, 15.2% post-operatively; p = 0.03). Patients undergoing LSG had improvement in DM2 and HTN but not in HL or GERD; there was no reduction in insulin dependence. Weight loss was not significantly different between groups; mean percent total weight loss at 36 months was 26.9 ± 9.0% in the LSG group and 23.9 ± 9.3% in the LRYGB group, p = 0.24.

Conclusions

Both LSG and RYGB can be safely performed on morbidly obese, elderly adults. At intermediate follow-up, there is an increased metabolic benefit for elderly patients undergoing LRYGB over LSG.

     

Reinforcing the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Three Different Techniques

Background

Gastric leak and hemorrhage are the most important challenges after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). In order to reduce these complications, the staple line can be reinforced by absorbable sutures or by the use of glycolide trimethylene carbonate copolymer onto the linear stapler (Gore Seamguard®; W.L. Gore &; Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ). To our knowledge, there are no randomized studies showing the utility of staple line reinforcement during LSG. The purpose of this study was to randomly compare three techniques in LSG: no staple line reinforcement (group 1), buttressing of the staple line with Gore Seamguard® (group 2), and staple line suturing (group 3).

Methods

Between January 2008 and February 2009, 75 patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled in the three different techniques of handling the staple line during LSG. The patient groups were similar (NS).

Results

Mean operative time to perform the stomach sectioning was 15.9?±?5.9 min (group 1), 20.8?±?8.1 min (group 2), and 30.8?±?10.1 min (group 3) (p?p?=?0.02). Mean blood loss during stomach sectioning was 19.5?±?21.3 mL (group 1), 3.6?±?4.7 mL (group 2), and 16.7?±?23.5 mL (group 3) (p?p?=?0.03). Mean number of stapler cartridges used was 5.6?±?0.7 (group 1), 5.7?±?0.7 (group 2), and 5.8?±?0.6 (group 3) (NS). Postoperative leak affected one patient (group 1), two patients (group 2), and one patient (group 3) (NS). Mean hospital stay was 3.6?±?1.4 days (group 1), 3.9?±?1.5 days (group 2), and 2.8?±?0.8 days (group 3) (p?=?0.01).

Conclusions

In LSG, buttressing the staple line with Gore Seamguard® statistically reduces blood loss during stomach sectioning as well as overall blood loss. No staple line reinforcement statistically decreases the time to perform stomach sectioning and the total operative time. No significant difference is evidenced in terms of postoperative leak between the three techniques of LSG.

     

Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,Gastric Emptying Time,Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1), Ghrelin and Leptin in Non-morbidly Obese Subjects with BMI 30–35.0 kg/m<Superscript>2</Superscript>: a Prospective Study

Background

The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 30.0–35.0 kg/m². Possible mechanisms, including alterations in gastric emptying time (GET), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), ghrelin and leptin, were evaluated.

Methods

Twenty obese patients with T2DM and with a BMI of 30.0–35.0 kg/m² underwent LSG during March 2012 to February 2015. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and GET were measured at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Fasting and post-prandial levels of serum GLP-1, ghrelin and leptin were measured pre-operatively and after 3 and 6 months.

Results

The average duration of follow-up was 17.6 months, and 10 patients had completed 2 years of follow-up. After 2 years, the average BMI decreased from 33.4?±?1.2 to 26.7?±?1.8 kg/m². The mean HbA1c decreased from 8.7?±?1.6 to 6.7?±?1.5 %, respectively. Ten patients achieved complete remission. Insulin could be stopped in all six patients who were on it pre-operatively. Meal-stimulated GLP-1 response and serum insulin at 30 min showed a significant increase following surgery. There was a significant decrease in GET.

Conclusions

This prospective study confirms the positive impact of LSG on diabetic status of non-morbidly obese patients. The possible mechanisms include the rise in post-prandial GLP-1 level induced by accelerated gastric emptying, leading to an increase in insulin secretion. LSG also leads to decreased ghrelin and leptin levels which may have a role in improving glucose homeostasis after surgery.

     

Nutritional Status Prior to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery

Background

Two main causes for nutrient deficiencies following bariatric surgery (BS) are pre-operative deficiencies and favoring foods with high-energy density and poor micronutrient content. The aims of this study were to evaluate nutritional status and gender differences and the prevalence of nutritional deficiencies among candidates for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) surgery.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of pre-surgery data collected as part of a randomized clinical trial on 100 morbidly obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) admitted to LSG surgery at Assuta Medical Center between February 2014 and January 2015. Anthropometrics, food intake, and fasting blood tests were evaluated during the baseline visit.

Results

One-hundred patients completed the pre-operative measurements (60 % female) with a mean age of 41.9?±?9.8 years and a mean BMI of 42.3?±?4.7 kg/m². Pre-operatively, deficiencies for iron, ferritin, folic acid, vitamin B1, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and hemoglobin were 6, 1, 1, 6, 0, 22, and 6 %, respectively. Pre-surgery, mean energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrate intake were 2710.7?±?1275.7 kcal/day, 114.2?±?48.5, 110.6?±?54.5, and 321.6?±?176.1 gr/day, respectively. The intakes for iron, calcium, folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B1 were below the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) recommendations for 46, 48, 58, 14, and 34 % of the study population, respectively.

Conclusion

We found a low prevalence of nutritional deficiencies pre-operatively except for vitamin D. Most micronutrient intake did not reach the DRI recommendations, despite high-caloric and macronutrient intake indicating a poor dietary quality.

     

Early Weight Loss as a Predictor of 2-Year Weight Loss and Resolution of Comorbidities After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate whether early postoperative weight loss predicts weight loss 1 and 2 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and to determine its effect on the resolution of comorbidities.

Methods

This was a prospective study of patients who underwent LSG at Jordan University Hospital from February 2009 to January 2014.

Results

One hundred ninety patients (mean age 34.0?±?10.8 years; mean preoperative body mass index 46.2?±?7.7 kg/m²) were included in the study. Of these, 146 were followed for 1 year and 73 were followed for 2 years. Thirty patients (20.5 %) had hypertension, 23 (15.8 %) had diabetes, 78 (53.4 %) had hyperlipidemia, 30 (20.5 %) had obstructive sleep apnea, and 50 (34.2 %) had more than one comorbidity. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 22.7?±?8.1, 75.1?±?22.8, and 72.6?±?17.5 at 1, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Fifty-five patients (37.7 %) had a 1-year %EWL of ≥80 %, and 29 (39.7 %) had a 2-year %EWL of ≥80 %. Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation between 1-month %EWL and %EWL at 1 year (r ²?=?0.23, p?<?0.001) and 2 years (r ²?=?0.28, p?<?0.001). Resolution of comorbidities was associated with higher %EWL achieved at 1 year, but early postoperative weight loss did not have a significant effect on comorbidity resolution.

Conclusions

Early postoperative weight loss can be used to identify and target poor responders.

     

Long-term Metabolic Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Objective

Obesity is one of the major health challenges throughout the world. The association between obesity and diabetes is well established because 90% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) show excess body weight. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the long-term follow-up.

Methods

One hundred ninety-five obese patients, 78 with T2DM, were evaluated before and after LSG up to 10 years, to identify complete diabetes remission (FPG?<?100 mg/dl, A1c?<?6.0%), partial remission (FPG 100–125 mg/dl, A1c?<?6.5%), or relapse.

Results

Before surgery, body weight and BMI were 123?±?21 kg and 44.6?±?6.8 kg/m² respectively; at a mean follow-up of 7 years (range 4–10), body weight was 104.9?±?18 kg and BMI 37?±?6 kg/m². Minimum weight was reached after 2 years. T2DM remission was observed in 66, 57, and 52% at short (<?2 years), medium (2–5 years), and long-term (>?5 years) follow-up respectively. Furthermore, 45.2% maintained complete remission for at least 5 years and about 36% showed a persistent but improved diabetes. None of the patients cured from diabetes had a duration disease greater than 8 years and a glycemic control requiring insulin. The prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia significantly decreased from 49 to 35% and from 51 to 40% respectively.

Conclusions

LSG significantly improves body weight, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in long-term follow-up.

     

Trends in Early Morbidity and Mortality after Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients over 60 Years

Background

The population are getting older and obesity is growing. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is increasingly used worldwide but is still used with skepticism in the elderly. The purpose of our analysis is to judge the security of LSG in patients older than 60 years compared to patients younger than 60 years.

Methods

This retrospective review included data of all patients in Germany who underwent LSG between January 2005 and December 2016.The data were published online in the German Bariatric Surgery Registry. A total of 21,571 operations were gathered and divided into two groups: group I, patients <?60 years old; and group II, patients ≥?60 years old.

Results

The total number of patients and the mean body mass index of group I and group II was 19,786, 51.7?±?9.5 kg/m² and 1771, 49.2?±?8.1 kg/m², respectively. Regarding comorbidities, group II suffered statistically significantly more comorbidities than group I (p?<?0.001). The general postoperative complications were 4.9% in group I and 7.8% in group II (p?<?0.001). There was no significant difference in special postoperative complications (p?=?0.048) and a slightly higher intraoperative complication rate in group II (2.2% vs. 1.6%, p?=?0.048). Thirty-day mortality rate for group I versus II was 0.22% and 0.23% (p?=?0.977), respectively.

Conclusions

LSG is a low-risk operation and safe surgical method with acceptable, not elevated perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in patients ≥?60 years of age.

     

Impact of Botulinum Neurotoxin Pyloric Injection During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Postoperative Gastric Leak: a Clinical Randomized Study

Background

The most frequent and most feared complication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gastric leak (GL). We hypothesize that botulinum neurotoxin (botulinum type A (BTX-A)) injection into the pyloric sphincter muscle at the time of operation may decrease the risk of postoperative GL.

Methods

Consecutive patients with morbid obesity (MO) treated by LSG were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (intrapyloric BTX-A injection was performed) and group II (no injection was performed). The primary outcome measure was number of patients developing GL. Secondary outcome measures were percent of excess weight loss, postoperative complications, and their management.

Results

One hundred and fifteen patients (86 (74.8 %) females) were randomized into two groups of 57 patients (group I) and 58 patients (group II). Four patients in group II developed GL versus no patient in group I (P?=?0.04). Ten patients in group I and two in group II developed refractory epigastric pain (P?=?0.01). Other complication rates were comparable for both groups. Mean preoperative BMI of patients in both groups had significantly decreased from 54.64?±?6.82 to 42.99?±?5.3 at 6 months and to 39.09?±?5.14 at 12 months (P?<?0.001).

Conclusions

LSG is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive procedure for treatment of MO. No patient in whom pyloric BTX-A injection was performed developed postoperative GL versus four patients in whom injection was not performed. The difference in GL rate was statistically significant, thus favoring the use of pyloric BTX-A injection during LSG.

     

Role of Percutaneous Glue Treatment After Persisting Leak After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Over the years, many treatment modes have been attempted for gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Minimally invasive techniques for GCF treatment include stent placement and radiological percutaneous glue treatment (GT).

Material and Method

Ten patients underwent a radiological acrylate mixed with contrast medium GT combined or not with other treatment strategies such as relaparoscopy, ultrasound, or computerized tomography scan (CT scan)-guided drain and endoscopic stent placement.

Results

Ten patients (mean age 47.1 years, range 64–29) were treated by percutaneous injection of glue after LSG leak. Body mass index (BMI) was 42.2 kg/m²?±?6.7 at the time of LSG surgery. Mean time between LSG and leak diagnosis was 12 days (range 4–31 days). GT was only effective when performed after endoscopic stent placement (80 % resolution). With this regimen, five patients required a laparoscopic Roux limb placement. All fistulas eventually healed a mean of 75 days (range 29–293 days) after GCF diagnosis.

Conclusions

Percutaneous glue treatment alone does not seem to provide adequate results. Stenting previous to the glue treatment allows for better results.