Performance of Siriraj Liquid-Based Cytology: a Single Center Report Concerning over 100,000 Samples

Background: To evaluate the performance of Siriraj liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical neoplasiascreening after increasing use of this technology. Materials and Methods: Cytological reports of 103,057Siriraj-LBC specimens obtained in 2007-2009 were compared with those of 23,676 specimens obtained in 2006.Results: Comparing with the year 2006, the 2007-2009 patients were slightly older (43.4±12.yr vs 42.7±12.2yr, p <0.001), and their specimens had much lower proportion of unsatisfactory slides (OR=0.06, 95%CI0.04-0.09) with comparable detection rates (3.96% vs 3.70%, p=0.052) but different proportions of variouscytological abnormalities (p<0.001). The 2007-2009 Siriraj-LBC had a negative predictive value (NPV) forcervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) of 97.6% and an overall positive predictive value (PPV) of 43.9%.The PPV for CIN2+ varied with types of abnormal cytology, from 13.7% to 93.8% in atypical squamous cellsof undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), atypical squamouscells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), atypical glandularcells (AGC), to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), respectively. The PPVs for CIN2+ in ASCUS and LSIL werecomparable, but the PPV for CIN1 was higher for LSIL than for ASCUS (41.63% vs 16.32%). Conclusions:Siriraj-LBC has demonstrated a stable detection rate and NPV for CIN2+ of >95% since the first year of use.The comparable PPVs for CIN2+ of ASCUS and LSIL suggests that these two conditions may undergo similarmanagement; other cytological abnormalities need immediate evaluation.     

ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy of liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the cytologic follow-up of cases with "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade lesion" (ASC-H) or "atypical glandular cells" (AGC). METHODS: Cytologic follow-up was performed on 214 cases with ASC-H/AGC diagnosis an conventional smears using either ThinPrep (n = 100) or conventional Papanicoloau (Pap) tests (n = 114). Results were then compared with further histologic and/or cytologic follow-up. RESULTS: Repetition on conventional smears enabled a definite diagnosis (within normal limits [WNL], squamous intraepithelial lesion [SIL] or carcinoma) in 58 cases (50.9%). ASC/AGC was confirmed in 50 cases (43.9%), and 6 of the smears (5.3%) were inadequate. WNL, SIL, or carcinoma was diagnosed in 82 (82.0%) cases by following the patients with ThinPrep cytology, whereas ASC or AGC was confirmed in 18 cases (18.0%). No inadequate specimens were found. A diagnosis of SIL or greater (SIL +) was confirmed histologically in 11 of 11 (100.0%) conventional smears and in 31 of 34 (91.2%) ThinPrep specimens. Of the 87 WNL specimens, 9 (8 conventional smears and 1 ThinPrep specimen) developed a histologically confirmed SIL during further follow-up. Specimen adequacy was significantly better in the ThinPrep specimens compared with conventional smears. CONCLUSIONS: Because of better specimen adequacy, ThinPrep cervical cytology appears to significantly reduce the occurrence of ASC/AGC compared with conventional Pap smears.     

Clinical significance of the diagnosis of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

BACKGROUND:

The diagnosis of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL‐H) was not included in the 2001 Bethesda System. It is used in some institutions to diagnose cases that fulfill criteria for both the diagnosis of LSIL and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC‐H). In this study, the authors reviewed their experience with cases reported as LSIL‐H during a 4‐year interval.

METHODS:

Clinical information and histologic follow‐up data were retrieved for Papanicolaou (Pap) tests (PTs) that were diagnosed as LSIL‐H, LSIL, ASC‐H and high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2007.

RESULTS:

Of 235,645 PTs (97% SurePath) that were processed during the study period, the laboratory diagnosed 0.52% as ASC‐H, 2% as LSIL, 0.30% as LSIL‐H, and 0.39% as HSIL. Biopsy follow‐up was available for 47%, 49%, 56.7% and 74% of these cases, respectively. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN‐2) and CIN‐3 or more severe lesions (CIN‐3+) were identified on follow‐up cervical biopsy more often in women who had diagnoses of LSIL‐H and ASC‐H (33.14% and 26.33%, respectively) than in women who had a diagnosis of LSIL (16.11%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The similarity of histologic follow‐up results between LSIL‐H and ASC‐H suggested that the management of women who have a diagnosis of LSIL‐H should be similar to the management of women who have a diagnosis of ASC‐H. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic acid in Detecting High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Pre- and Post-Menopausal Thai Women with Minor Cervical CytologicalAbnormalities

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in detecting high-gradecervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pre- and post-menopausal women with atypical squamous cells ofundetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou (Pap)smears. Materials and Methods: Two hundred women (150 pre-menopausal and 50 post-menopausal) with ASCUSand LSIL cytology who attended the colposcopy clinic, Thammasat University Hospital, between March 2013and August 2014 were included. All women underwent VIA testing and colposcopy by gynecologic oncologists.Diagnostic values of VIA testing including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negativepredictive value (NPV) for detecting high-grade CIN were determined using the histopathology obtained fromcolposcopic-directed biopsy as a gold standard. Results: VIA testing was positive in 54/150 (36%) pre-menopausalwomen and 5/50 (10%) post-menopausal women. Out of 54 pre-menopausal women with positive VIA testing,15 (27.8%) had high-grade CIN and 39 (72.2%) had either CIN 1 or insignificant pathology. Ten (10.4%), 43(44.8%) and 43 (44.8%) out of the remaining 96 pre-menopausal women with negative VIA testing had highgradeCIN, CIN 1 and insignificant pathology, respectively. Out of 5 post-menopausal women with positive VIAtesting, there were 4 (80%) women with high-grade CIN, and 1 (20%) women with insignificant pathology. Outof 45 VIA-negative post-menopausal women, 42 (93.3%) women had CIN 1 and insignificant pathology, and 3(6.7%) had high-grade CIN. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the VIA testing were 59.4%, 76.2%, 32.2%and 90.8%, respectively (60%, 68.8%, 27.8% and 89.6% in pre-menopausal women and 57.1%, 97.7%, 80%and 93.3% in post-menopausal women). Conclusions: VIA testing may be used as a screening tool for detectinghigh-grade CIN in women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities in a low-resource setting in order tolower the rate of colposcopy referral.     

Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?

BACKGROUND: It is commonly believed that the sensitivity of Papanicolaou (Pap) tests decreases with a short interval between cytology samplings. To the authors' knowledge, there is only limited evidence to support this belief. METHODS: For 5055 women in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS)-Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) Triage Study (ALTS), the Pap interval was defined as the number of days between the referral Pap smear demonstrating ASCUS or LSIL ("first cytology") and the enrollment liquid-based ("repeat") cytology. The authors investigated the influence of the interval between Pap smears on repeat cytology by examining percentages of abnormal findings, cellularity, and test sensitivity among women diagnosed with histologic grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) during the 2-year course of the ALTS. In addition, because human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA adjunct testing is now performed, the authors evaluated HPV viral load, which was assayed using residual liquid cytology specimens, in women with CIN3. RESULTS: The Pap interval ranged from 8-30 days in 763 women, 31-60 days in 2317 women, 61-90 days in 1090 women, 91-120 days in 491 women, and 121-184 days in 394 women (mean of 61.3 days; standard deviation of 34 days). Repeat cytologic interpretations of unsatisfactory findings, ASCUS, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) did not appear to vary among the Pap interval groups. However, low-grade cytologic regression occurred with an increasing Pap interval; negative cytology increased from 28.3% (8-30 days) to 41.6% (121-184 days) (P < 0.0001) whereas LSIL cytology decreased (P trend = 0.002). The approximate cellularity of the samples was slightly better in the interval group of 8-30 days (P trend = 0.04). Among women with CIN3, the repeat test sensitivity at a threshold of ASCUS or greater and the HPV DNA viral load was not found to vary by Pap interval (P trend = 0.80 and P trend = 0.36, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that a short Pap interval (range, 15-120 days) does not significantly affect the quality of liquid-based repeat cytology, nor the viral load tested from a residual liquid-based specimen.     

DNA ploidy compared with human papilloma virus testing (Hybrid Capture II) and conventional cervical cytology as a primary screening test for cervical high-grade lesions and cancer in 1555 patients with biopsy confirmation

BACKGROUND: Because 80% of cervical cancers arise in low-resource settings, many inexpensive strategies are being tested. In that spirit, the authors are testing large-scale genomic or DNA ploidy measurements as an inexpensive and semiautomated strategy. METHODS: Patients entered either a screening or diagnostic study of several optical technologies: quantitative cytology, quantitative histopathology, and fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy using a point probe, a multispectral digital colposcope, or a combination of the two. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and their confidence interval testing conventional cytology, Hybrid Capture (HC) II testing, and DNA ploidy measured on the Feulgen-stained quantitative Pap smear. RESULTS: The current investigation reports on 1555 patients for whom colposcopically directed biopsies were read 3 times by study pathologists. The final histopathologic diagnosis was high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 2, CIN 3, carcinoma in situ [CIS], and cancer) in 16% of patients. Using high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) histopathology as the threshold and gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were: 0.47 and 0.96 for conventional cytology, 0.91 and 0.80 for HC II, and 0.59 and 0.93 for DNA ploidy. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for conventional cytology were 0.70 and 0.90, 0.46 and 0.98 for HC II, and 0.63 and 0.92 for DNA ploidy. CONCLUSIONS: DNA ploidy shows comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values to conventional cytology and HC II. Unlike conventional cytology, DNA ploidy is semiautomated and can be performed in less than 8 hours. Cost effectiveness studies are under way, but in the authors' laboratory DNA ploidy is inexpensive.     

Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) 2 or higher and cancer between conventional Pap smear (CPP) and liquid based Pap smear (LBP). Methods: Thisretrospective study was conducted at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between January 2011 andDecember 2016. Data was collected from medical records of participants who attended for cervical cancer screening test.Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for detectingCIN 2 or higher were evaluated by using the most severity of histopathology reports. Results: A total of 28,564 caseswere recruited. Prevalence of abnormal Pap smear from CPP and LBP were 4.8 % (1,092/22,552) and 5.7 % (345/6,012),respectively. Percentage of unsatisfactory smears in CPP (52.3%) was higher than LBP (40.5%). From CPP and LBP,cervical cancer percentages were 0.2 and 0.1, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CPP andLBP for detection cancer were 42.5 vs 26.1%, 99.9 vs 100.0%, 69.8vs 75.0%, 99.7 vs 100.0 % and 99.7 vs 99.7%,respectively. Conclusion: Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology and cancer from CPP and LBP were 4.8/0.2and 5.7/0.1 percent, respectively. Unsatisfactory smear of LBP was less than CPP. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPVand accuracy of CPP and LBP for detection CIN 2 or higher and cancer were comparable.     

"See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy

This study was undertaken to evaluate the overtreatment rate of women with abnormal cervical cytology undergoing colposcopy followed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), the so-called "see and treat" approach. Overtreatment was defined as LEEP specimens containing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 or less. In this study, medical records of 192 women with abnormal Pap smears undergoing the "see and treat" approach in Chiang Mai University Hospital between October 2008 and October 2010 were reviewed. The preceding Pap smears were as follows: 124 (64.6%) with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL); 35 (18.2%) with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H); 20 (10.4%) with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); 9 (4.7%) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA); and 4 (2.1%) with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). Histologic results obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) were as follows: CIN 2-3, 106 (55.2%); invasive cancer, 41 (21.4%); CIN 1, 15 (7.8%); adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 1 (0.5%); and no lesion, 29 (15.1%). Overall, 22.9% of LEEP specimens contained CIN 1 or less. Significant predictors for overtreatment were type of preceding smears and colposcopic impression. If the "see and treat" approach was strictly carried out in women who had either smears or colposcopic findings revealing high-grade disease, the overtreatment rate was only 7%. Hemorrhagic complication was 6.2% and all could be treated at an outpatient department. In conclusion, the overtreatment rate of the "see and treat" approach in women with various degree of abnormal Pap smears is 23% which would be diminished to the acceptable rate of lower that 10% if strictly performed in those with either smears or colposcopic impressions revealing high-grade abnormality. Peri-operative LEEP complications were mild and acceptable.     

The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

BACKGROUND: Cervical cytologic specimens that show a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) occasionally contain a few cells that are suspicious for, but not diagnostic of, a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). In such cases, a diagnosis of LSIL cannot exclude HSIL is rendered. The objective of the current study was to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) for HSIL in follow-up cervical biopsies for these cases. METHODS: One hundred forty-four women with a Papanicolaou (Pap) diagnosis of LSIL cannot exclude HSIL and their follow-up cervical biopsies were reviewed. Results were compared with a control group of 155 women with a Pap diagnosis of LSIL. A subset of biopsies was tested and typed for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by polymerase chain reaction amplification using consensus primers followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. HPVs were scored as low-risk or high-risk types. RESULTS: Women with LSIL cannot exclude HSIL had a higher incidence of HSIL (PPV = 29%) on follow-up cervical biopsy than the control group (PPV = 15%, P < 0.01). In addition, SIL, indeterminate grade was diagnosed in 10% of cervical biopsies in the study group as compared with 4% in controls. Review of Pap smears from the study group showed that there were 3 types of cells suspicious for a high-grade lesion: atypical squamous metaplastic cells (62%), atypical keratinized cells (20%), and dysplastic cells of borderline nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio (18%). HPV analysis confirmed the presence of high-risk HPV types in the study cases with high-grade cervical biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a Pap diagnosis of LSIL cannot exclude HSIL appear to be more likely to harbor a high-grade lesion than those diagnosed with LSIL alone. Its use appears warranted. Women with this diagnosis merit appropriate clinical follow-up to exclude HSIL.     

细胞DNA倍体分析评估宫颈上皮内瘤变

目的评价通过细胞DNA倍体分析诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）的效果。方法对87例宫颈癌普查妇女用宫颈刷取材、液基薄层制片,由细胞学医师对巴氏染色片做常规细胞诊断,应用全自动DNA倍体分析仪对DNA染色片进行自动扫描诊断。对活检样本做出病理诊断,并应用免疫组化ABC法测定宫颈鳞状上皮细胞核内Ki67蛋白的表达。结果87例受检者中,常规细胞学诊断为正常30例,非典型鳞状细胞（ASCUS）20例,低度鳞状上皮内病变（LSIL）30例,高度鳞状上皮内病变（HSIL）7例;无异倍体细胞者26例,有异倍体细胞者61例,其中Ⅰ级17例,Ⅱ级21例,Ⅲ级23例。20例ASCUS者中,有7例无异倍体细胞,未发现一例CIN2以上级别的病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞分布在鳞状上皮下方37．1％范围内;13例有异倍体细胞者中,11例有CIN2以上病理改变,Ki67免疫阳性细胞分布于上皮层下46．2％范围内。30例LSIL者中,有7例未发现异倍体细胞,其中3例有CIN2以上病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞只分布在鳞状上皮下方37．1％范围内;23例伴有DNA异倍体细胞者中,22例发现CIN2以上病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞增至鳞状上皮层中上方62．6％范围内,与7例未发现异倍体细胞者差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。7例HSIL病例中均有DNA异倍体细胞出现。以≥3个DNA异倍体细胞作为评估CIN2及以上病理改变的标准,其敏感性为72．7％,特异性为87．5％,阳性预测值为90．9％,阴性预测值为65．1％,均比以常规细胞学诊断为LSIL及以上级别作为评估CIN2及以上病理改变的标准（分别为58．2％、84．4％、86．5％和54．0％）要高。结论DNA倍体分析可诊断宫颈CIN病变,并预测其发展。     

Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Despite the enormous impact that Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening has had on the incidence of cervical carcinoma in developed countries, there is still an unacceptably high frequency of occurrence of this cancer. In part, this is due to human error associated with cytologic diagnoses of Pap smears. Also, the use of new sampling devices, such as the cytobrush, has increased the complexity of diagnosing benign and neoplastic cervical cytology. This is particularly apparent in the diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS). Approximately 40% of AGUS diagnoses have a corresponding significant lesion at biopsy follow-up, and 60% do not. There is clearly a need for an adjunct to cytologic diagnosis that can readily identify AGUS smears that are diagnostic of significant lesions. The authors have identified the MN/CA9 antigen as a strong candidate for an adjunct biomarker. METHODS: A total of 245 Pap smears of all AGUS diagnostic categories with histologic confirmation were studied. The median age of the patients was 39 years. The Bethesda system classification (AGUS-favor reactive, AGUS-not otherwise specified, and AGUS-favor neoplastic) was used. All of the Pap smears were decolorized and immunostained with monoclonal antibody to MN/CA9 antigen by the immunoperoxidase technique. The results of MN/CA9 immunoreactivity were correlated with the histologic data in a semiblinded fashion. RESULTS: The follow-up biopsies showed that a high percentage (70%) of patients had low and high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions, respectively (CIN I and CIN II or III). Clinically significant lesions-adenocarcinoma in situ/carcinoma (AIS/CA) and CIN II or III-were found in 50% of the cases. Among these, 11% were AIS/CA. In the three subcategories of AGUS diagnosis, the AGUS-not otherwise specified showed the broadest range of lesions in the follow-up biopsies. Three patterns of MN/CA9 immunoreactivity were observed in the Pap smears: 1) atypical cells, 2) normal endocervical cells only, and 3) all cells negative. All Pap smears that were MN/CA9 positive were histologically confirmed to be clinically significant lesions or CIN I; in addition, there were a very small number (n = 12) of cases of atypia. None of the benign lesions showed MN/CA9 expression in the corresponding Pap smears. Furthermore, the pattern of atypical cell immunostaining identified all cases with significant lesions (AIS/CA and CIN II or III) in the cervices. Conversely, the majority of CIN I cases (82%) and all cases of atypia showed positive immunostaining restricted to normal endocervical cells only. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear association between MN/CA9 immunostaining of atypical cells and the presence of significant lesions in the cervix. Similarly, there is a clear association between lack of expression of MN/CA9 and the absence of cervical lesions. However, the screen does not allow discrimination between CIN I and atypia. The authors also found that, based on the combined patterns of morphology and immunostaining, they are able to discriminate between AIS and CIN II or III in AGUS Pap smear diagnoses. Thus, expression of the MN/CA9 antigen is indeed a discriminator of significant lesions in AGUS Pap smear diagnoses.     

Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study

The aim of this six-centre, split-sample study was to compare ThinPrep fluid-based cytology to the conventional Papanicolaou smear. Six cytopathology laboratories and 35 gynaecologists participated. 5428 patients met the inclusion criteria (age > 18 years old, intact cervix, informed consent). Each cervical sample was used first to prepare a conventional Pap smear, then the sampling device was rinsed into a PreservCyt vial, and a ThinPrep slide was made. Screening of slide pairs was blinded (n = 5428). All non-negative concordant cases (n = 101), all non-concordant cases (n = 206), and a 5% random sample of concordant negative cases (n = 272) underwent review by one independent pathologist then by the panel of 6 investigators. Initial (blinded) screening results for ThinPrep and conventional smears were correlated. Initial diagnoses were correlated with consensus cytological diagnoses. Differences in disease detection were evaluated using McNemar's test. On initial screening, 29% more ASCUS cases and 39% more low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and more severe lesions (LSIL+) were detected on the ThinPrep slides than on the conventional smears (P = 0.001), including 50% more LSIL and 18% more high-grade SIL (HSIL). The ASCUS:SIL ratio was lower for the ThinPrep method (115:132 = 0.87:1) than for the conventional smear method (89:94 = 0.95:1). The same trend was observed for the ASCUS/AGUS:LSIL ratio. Independent and consensus review confirmed 145 LSIL+ diagnoses; of these, 18% more had been detected initially on the ThinPrep slides than on the conventional smears (P = 0.041). The ThinPrep Pap Test is more accurate than the conventional Pap test and has the potential to optimize the effectiveness of primary cervical cancer screening.     

The PapSpin: a reasonable alternative to other, more expensive liquid-based Papanicolaou tests

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to optimize a liquid-based Papanicolaou (Pap) test by using common cytopathology laboratory equipment and resulted in an inexpensive test that was equivalent at least diagnostically to the conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. METHODS: Adult women (n = 482) were consented, enrolled, and included in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. After conventional Pap smear slides were obtained, clinicians placed the collection device with residual cells from the uterine cervix in a preservative fluid. In the cytopathology laboratory, a conventional centrifuge device was used to deposit the cells from the liquid onto a glass slide. RESULTS: Among the conventional Pap smears, 43 were categorized as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 30 were categorized as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or greater (HSIL+). Among the PapSpin samples, 49 were categorized as LSIL and 24 were categorized as HSIL+. Biopsy confirmation was obtained in 124 patients. There were 23 women diagnosed with LSIL and 27 women diagnosed with HSIL+. Diagnostic agreement between cytologic samples and biopsies is as follows: for conventional Pap smears, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 15 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses; for PapSpin samples, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 14 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses. Exact agreement was achieved between PapSpin and conventional smears in 404 patients (84%). Quality indictors were better in the PapSpin group, except for inadequate endocervical component, which was greater in the PapSpin samples, a difference that was explained by the split-sample study design, which favored the conventional smear. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that PapSpin is a legitimate, inexpensive alternative to the conventional Pap smear for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, resulting in better preservation and improved cell visualization. In addition, the liquid residual allows for reflex human papillomavirus-DNA or polymerase chain reaction testing.     

Validity of combined cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping with adjuvant DNA-cytometry in routine cervical screening: results from 31031 women from the Bonn-region in West Germany

Our aim was to improve the accuracy of routine cervical screening by a risk-adapted multimodal protocol with special focus on possible reduction and prognostic assessment of false positive results. A cohort of 31031 women from the Bonn-region in West Germany, median age 36 years, were screened by cytology (conventional or liquid-based), followed by PCR-based HVP detection with genotyping and adjuvant DNA image cytometry, if indicated, in a sequential manner. The true prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma (>/=CIN2) was 0.32% in the population as projected from cervical biopsies of 123 women (0.4%), of whom 100 showed >/=CIN2. Sensitivity of the cytology screening program at PapIIID/HSIL threshold for detecting histologically confirmed >/=CIN2 cases was 81%, with specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99, 20.9 and 99.9%, respectively. Of 38 women receiving the complete screening protocol, all the 31 >/=CIN2 cases were correctly detected by cytology alone, 30 by positive high-risk HPV genotype and 30 by aneuploid DNA profile. The combination of the three methods resulted in an up to 6.9% increase in PPV for >/=CIN2 at practically unchanged detection rate with the additional benefit of being able to predict the probable outcome of CIN1 lesions detected as false positives with any single test. Multimodal cervical screening might permit identification of those women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions likely to progress at an earlier and curable stage of disease and lengthen the screening interval in those with transient minor lesions caused by productive HPV infection.     

Implementation of the Thinprep imaging system in a tertiary military medical center

BACKGROUND:

The ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) was implemented at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) in February 2006 and has been a crucial part of the ability of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Services ability to improve efficiency and turnaround times for Papanicolaou (Pap) test reporting. The increased detection rate of squamous abnormalities, specifically high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), has been well documented by many studies. In addition, the TIS has increased productivity for many laboratories. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing the TIS at BAMC, a tertiary military medical center. Specifically, the following were assessed: 1) whether the detection of squamous abnormalities was increased with the TIS, 2) how the rate of high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) detection in atypical squamous cells (ASC) of undetermined significance (ASC‐US) cases changed (or did not change) before and after implementation of the TIS, and 3) how the TIS influenced productivity.

METHODS:

All gynecologic cytology at BAMC has been collected and processed using the ThinPrep system since 2002. Before February 2006 and before implementation of the TIS, Pap tests were screened manually by the cytotechnologists. Detection rates of squamous abnormalities were compared between the period from February 2005 to December 2005 (manual screening) and the period from February 2006 to December 2006 (image‐assisted screening). Squamous abnormalities included ASC‐US; ASC, cannot rule out HSIL (ASC‐H); low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); HSIL; glandular abnormalities; and malignancies (squamous or glandular). In addition, the rates of HR‐HPV‐positive, HR‐HPV‐negative, and HR‐HPV‐quantity not sufficient were compared for the same periods. During both periods, testing for HR‐HPV was performed only on ASC‐US Pap tests. HR‐HPV was tested with Digene Hybrid Capture 2 methodology. Productivity was calculated as the change in average slides screened per hour before and after imager implementation.

RESULTS:

In total, 107,647 Pap tests were analyzed in the 2005 (54,438 Pap tests) and 2006 (53,209 Pap tests) timeframes. Increases in the detection of ASC‐H, atypical glandular cells (AGC), LSIL, and HSIL were statistically significant. The proportion of negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and unsatisfactory cases decreased significantly with implementation of the TIS. The ASC to squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC:SIL) ratio decreased from 1.5 to 1.0 after TIS implementation. Decreases in the ASC‐US HR‐HPV‐positive proportion and increases in the ASC‐US HR‐HPV‐negative proportion after implementation of the TIS were statistically significant. In our laboratory, a 60% increase in productivity was noted with use of the TIS.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of the TIS at BAMC significantly increased the detection of ASC‐H, AGC, LSIL, and HSIL but had no significant impact on the ASC‐US detection rate. Although the ASC‐US rate did not change, both the HR‐HPV‐positive rate and the ASC:SIL ratio decreased. The data from the current study suggested that, at least initially, the use of imager‐directed screening may increase the number of clinically insignificant ASC‐US Pap tests. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2009. Published 2009 by the American Cancer Society.     

The APTIMA HPV assay versus the hybrid capture 2 test in triage of women with ASC‐US or LSIL cervical cytology: A meta‐analysis of the diagnostic accuracy

Testing for DNA of 13 high‐risk HPV types with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test has consistently been shown to perform better in triage of women with cervical cytology results showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC‐US) but often not in triage of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) detected in cervical cancer screening. In a meta‐analysis, we compared the accuracy of the APTIMA HPV test, which identifies RNA of 14 high‐risk HPV types, to HC2 for the triage of women with ASC‐US or LSIL. Literature search‐targeted studies where the accuracy of APTIMA HPV and HC2 for detection of underlying CIN2/3+ was assessed concomitantly including verification of all cases of ASC‐US and LSIL. HSROC (Hierarchical Summary ROC) curve regression was used to compute the pooled absolute and relative sensitivity and specificity. Eight studies, comprising 1,839 ASC‐US and 1,887 LSIL cases, were retrieved. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of APTIMA to triage ASC‐US to detect underlying CIN3 or worse was 96.2% (95% CI = 91.7–98.3%) and 54.9% (95% CI = 43.5–65.9%), respectively. APTIMA and HC2 showed similar pooled sensitivity; however, the specificity of the former was significantly higher (ratio: 1.19; 95% CI = 1.08–1.31 for CIN2+). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of APTIMA to triage LSIL were 96.7% (95% CI = 91.4–98.9%) and 38.7% (95% CI = 30.5–47.6%) for CIN3+. APTIMA was as sensitive as HC2 but more specific (ratio: 1.35; 95% CI = 1.11–1.66). Results were similar for detection of CIN2 or worse. In both triage of ASC‐US and LSIL, APTIMA is as sensitive but more specific than HC2 for detecting cervical precancer.     

Papanicolaou test interpretations of “atypical squamous cells,cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion”

BACKGROUND.

Management guidelines for women with Papanicolaou (Pap) test interpretations of ASC‐H (atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) reflect substantial risk, which ranges from 10% to 68%, of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in their follow‐up histologic samples. The present study was initiated to determine the number of colposcopic procedures and the time frame that are typically required for a definitive diagnosis of a CIN2+ lesion after a Papanicolaou (Pap) test interpretation of ASC‐H in routine practice.

METHODS.

Clinicopathologic data on consecutive ASC‐H interpretations, 97% of which were on liquid‐based preparations, were reviewed. The number of biopsies (which was used in this context as a surrogate indicator for the number of colposcopic procedures) as well as the average duration required for a follow‐up histologic diagnosis of CIN2+ were determined.

RESULTS.

Of 500 ASC‐H interpretations, 75 were excluded for a variety of reasons and 165 lacked follow‐up in our records. The average age and follow‐up duration for the remaining 260 patients was 35.6 years and 18.5 months, respectively. CIN2+ was diagnosed in 49 (40%) of the 122 patients with at least 1 histologic follow‐up. Of these 49 patients, 72% (35 of 49) were diagnosed on the first follow‐up cervical biopsy, 14% (7 of 49) and 8% (4 of 49) were diagnosed on the second and third follow‐up biopsies, respectively; in only 6% (3 of 49) was a fourth follow‐up biopsy required. Overall, an average of 1.53 biopsies (range, 1–4) was required to attain a definitive diagnosis of CIN2+, and 28% of patients required more than 1 follow‐up biopsy. The average period between the index ASC‐H interpretations and CIN2+ diagnoses was 5.5 months. The average time to CIN2+ diagnoses by the first follow‐up biopsy was 3 months; for diagnoses made on subsequent biopsies, the average additional follow‐up duration was 8 months. Of the eventual CIN2+ diagnoses, 84% were rendered within 12 months of their associated index ASC‐H interpretations.

CONCLUSIONS.

1) A substantial subset—28%—of patients with biopsy‐proven CIN2+ after ASC‐H interpretations required more than 1 colposcopy for a definitive diagnosis of a high‐grade dysplastic lesion. 2) If a CIN2+ lesion is present, the vast majority can be diagnosed in a biopsy performed within 1 year of the ASC‐H interpretation. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2007. © Published 2007 by the American Cancer Society.     

Combined use of cytology,p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is very sensitive for primary cervical screening but has low specificity. Triage tests that improve specificity but maintain high sensitivity are needed. Women enrolled in the experimental arm of Phase 2 of the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer randomized controlled cervical screening trial were tested for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and referred to colposcopy if positive. hrHPV-positive women also had HPV genotyping (by polymerase chain reaction with GP5+/GP6+ primers and reverse line blotting), immunostaining for p16 overexpression and cytology. We computed sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for different combinations of tests and determined potential hierarchical ordering of triage tests. A number of 1,091 HPV-positive women had valid tests for cytology, p16 and genotyping. Ninety-two of them had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) histology and 40 of them had CIN grade 3+ (CIN3+) histology. The PPV for CIN2+ was >10% in hrHPV-positive women with positive high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (61.3%), positive low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+) (18.3%) and positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (14.8%) cytology, p16 positive (16.7%) and, hierarchically, for infections by HPV33, 16, 35, 59, 31 and 52 (in decreasing order). Referral of women positive for either p16 or LSIL+ cytology had 97.8% sensitivity for CIN2+ and women negative for both of these had a 3-year CIN3+ risk of 0.2%. Similar results were seen for women being either p16 or HPV16/33 positive. hrHPV-positive women who were negative for p16 and cytology (LSIL threshold) had a very low CIN3+ rate in the following 3 years. Recalling them after that interval and referring those positive for either test to immediate colposcopy seem to be an efficient triage strategy. The same applies to p16 and HPV16.     

Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study

BACKGROUND: Split-sample clinical trials for liquid-based Papanicolaou (Pap) smears demonstrated that the liquid-based Pap smear was a safe and effective replacement for the conventional Pap smear. However, clinical intended use of liquid-based technology employs direct-to-vial collection methods. The current study compared the cytologic detection rates of the liquid-based Pap smear with conventional Pap smears in a direct-to-vial study performed at three clinical sites. METHODS: Data from 58,580 prospective SurePath slides and 58,988 historic conventional slides were collected. Results were statistically compared with regard to disease prevalence and adequacy to include biopsy follow-up data for conventional and SurePath tests. RESULTS: The SurePath method was found to provide a statistically significantly greater detection rate for clinically important categories of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL+) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+) (64% and 107%, respectively; P < 0.00001 for each lesion) compared with conventional slides. The clinical significance of increased cytologic detection using SurePath was supported by biopsy data that essentially demonstrated concordance with regard to biopsy interpretation for HSIL+ (P = 0.9105 at Site 1; P = 1.0000 at Site 2; and P = 1.0000 at Site 3) and LSIL+ (P = 0.6966 at Site 1; P = 0.8052 at Site 2; and P = 1.00 at Site 3). The detection rate of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS+) was found to be significantly increased (75.12%; P < 0.00001). A statistically significantly lower proportion of unsatisfactory slides using the SurePath test compared with conventional slides was noted (-58%; P < 0.00001). The ASCUS/LSIL+ ratio was found to be reduced overall when using SurePath (-28.9%), regardless of whether the study sites were combined or considered individually. The rate of false-negative results noted with SurePath (10.43%) and conventional slides (12.97%) was essentially equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The SurePath Pap smear was found to outperform conventional slides in the detection of HSIL+ and LSIL+ cytologic lesions of the cervix and reduced the number of unsatisfactory diagnoses. The HSIL+ advantage for SurePath is not limited to HSIL but appears to extend to carcinoma as well.     

Invader human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 assays as adjuncts to HPV screening of cervical papanicolaou smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND:

High‐risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is standard practice for triaging women who have Papanicolaou (Pap) smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC‐US), however, only 5% to 17% of these women have underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN‐2)/CIN‐3. Recent reports have demonstrated that the presence of either HPV type 16 (HPV‐16) or HPV‐18 confers an elevated risk for CIN‐2/CIN‐3. The current study was designed to determine the prevalence of HPV‐16 and HPV‐18 in ASC‐US Pap smears and to determine whether further typing would enhance the risk stratification of patients for CIN‐2/CIN‐3.

METHODS:

One hundred seventy‐eight Pap smears with ASC‐US were screened retrospectively for HR HPV by using the proprietary Invader screening assay followed by typing for HPV‐16 and HPV‐18 by using Invader type‐specific probes on 100 of the samples. Clinical follow‐up results were correlated with HPV types.

RESULTS:

Fifty‐one percent of the ASC‐US samples were positive for HR HPV, the majority of which (70%) harbored non‐HPV‐16/HPV‐18 HR HPV types; 27% were associated with HPV‐16, whereas only 3% contained HPV‐18. The screening assay indicated that 46% of women who had Pap smears with ASC‐US were in need of further HPV‐16/HPV‐18 typing. Testing for HPV‐16 stratified women with ASC‐US into 3 groups: 1) 14% of women were positive for HPV‐16 and had a high risk (54%) of CIN‐2/CIN‐3 on follow‐up biopsy, 2) 35% of women were positive for non‐HPV‐16 HPV types and had an intermediate risk (9%), and 3) 51% of women were negative for HPV and had a negligible risk for CIN‐2/CIN‐3.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combined application of a proprietary screening assay and a type‐specific HPV‐16 assay demonstrated global potential for the development of tailored management protocols for women who have Pap smears with ASC‐US. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.