首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
To validate the Thai language version of the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) and the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients Questionnaire (EARP), as well as also to develop a new tool for screening psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among psoriasis (Ps) patients. This was a cross-sectional study. Ps patients visiting the psoriasis clinic at Siriraj Hospital were recruited. They completed the EARP and PEST. Full musculoskeletal history, examination, and radiography were evaluated. PsA was diagnosed by a rheumatologist’s evaluation and fulfillment of the classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performances of the tools. The Siriraj Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Tool (SiPAT) contained questions most relevant to peripheral arthritis, axial inflammation, and enthesitis, selected from multivariate analysis. Of a total of 159 patients, the prevalence of PsA was 78.6 %. The ROC curve analyses of Thai EARP, PEST, and SiPAT were 0.90 (95 % CI 0.84, 0.96), 0.85 (0.78, 0.92), and 0.89 (0.83, 0.95), respectively. The sensitivities of SiPAT, Thai EARP, and PEST were 91.0, 83.0, and 72.0 %, respectively, while the specificities were 69.0, 79.3, and 89.7 %, respectively. All screening questionnaires showed good diagnostic performances. SiPAT could be considered as a screening tool with its desirable properties: higher sensitivity and taking less time. Thai PEST and EARP could possibly be sequentially administered for people with a positive test from SiPAT to reduce the number of false positives.  相似文献   

4.
5.
6.

Objective

There is a high prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis. Identifying soluble biomarkers for PsA will help in screening psoriasis patients for appropriate rheumatology referral. We therefore aimed to investigate whether serum levels of novel markers previously discovered by quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of synovial fluid and skin biopsies performs better than the C‐reactive protein (CRP) level in differentiating PsA patients from those with psoriasis without PsA (PsC).

Methods

In this case–control study, serum samples were obtained from 100 subjects with PsA, 100 with PsC, and 100 healthy controls. Patients with PsA and PsC were group matched for age, sex, psoriasis duration, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and were not currently receiving biologic treatment. Using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, 4 high‐priority markers (Mac‐2‐binding protein [M2BP], CD5‐like protein [CD5L], myeloperoxidase [MPO], and integrin β5 [ITGβ5]), as well as previously established markers (matrix metalloproteinase 3 [MMP‐3] and CRP level) were assayed. Data were analyzed using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted.

Results

In comparisons to controls, CD5L, ITGβ5, M2BP, MPO, MMP‐3, and CRP level were independently associated with PsA, while only CD5L, M2BP, and MPO were independently associated with PsC alone. In comparisons to PsC, ITGβ5, M2BP, and CRP level were independently associated with PsA. ROC analysis of this model shows an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.80–0.90). The model that included CRP level alone had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78).

Conclusion

CD5L, ITGβ5, M2BP, MPO, MMP‐3, and CRP level are markers for PsA. The combination of ITGβ5, M2BP, and CRP level differentiates PsA from PsC, and performs better than CRP level alone.
  相似文献   

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Psoriatic arthritis is a systemic disorder that causes chronic pain, altered physical appearance, and loss of function. The clinical features are diverse, but the core manifestations are psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis. Our understanding about the psoriatic arthritis disease state, assessment, and treatment has advanced thanks to significant collaborative efforts by rheumatologists and dermatologists in the development of classification criteria, outcome measures to assess the various clinical domains, and treatment trials with agents also used for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. In particular, biologic agents, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, have demonstrated significant efficacy and reasonable safety in all clinical domains of the disease, resulting in amelioration of clinical symptoms, inhibition of structural damage, and improvement in function and quality of life.  相似文献   

16.
17.
18.
19.
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory joint disease in which environmental factors, particularly trauma and infections, are thought to play an important role. The authors describe the case of a patient with a mild and long-untreated form of PsA which was severely exacerbated by Salmonella typhimurium infection. This case confirms the importance of infectious agents in the occurrence and course of PsA. Received: 19 February 1999 / Accepted: 21 September 1999  相似文献   

20.
Biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may serve as surrogate end points for disease outcome and can provide insights into disease susceptibility and natural history. Biomarkers could relate to diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, therapeutic response, and comorbidities. The “felt need” is, however, in the development of biomarkers for the presence of PsA in patients with psoriasis, as well as that for joint damage. During the past few years, many studies related to PsA biomarkers have been conducted. These studies are reviewed here. C-reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase-3, and circulating osteoclast precursors show promise. An international goal-directed study to determine biomarkers for joint damage in PsA is now under way through a collaborative effort of GRAPPA (the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) and OMERACT (Outcome Measures for Rheumatology Clinical Trials).  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号