Evaluation of a new single-parameter volumetric flow cytometer (CyFlow(green)) for enumeration of absolute CD4+ T lymphocytes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected Thai patients

Use of the standard dual-platform flow cytometric method for determination of CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts, which needs both a flow cytometer (FCM) and hematological analyzer, would inevitably lead to increased variability. The development of new single-platform (SP) FCMs that provide direct CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts for improved assay precision and accuracy have recently attracted attention. This study evaluated one of those systems, CyFlow(green) (Partec), a single-parameter SP volumetric FCM. The performance of CyFlow(green) was compared with those of two reference standard SP microbead-based technologies of the three-color TruCOUNT tube with the FACScan FCM and a two-color FACSCount system (Becton Dickinson Biosciences). Absolute CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocyte counts in 200 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive blood specimens were determined. Statistical analysis for correlation and agreement were performed. A high correlation of absolute CD4 counts was shown when those obtained with CyFlow(green) were compared with those obtained with the bead-based three-color TruCOUNT system (R(2)=0.96; mean bias, -69.1 cells/microl; 95% confidence interval [CI], -225.7 to+87.5 cells/microl) and the FACSCount system (R(2)=0.97; mean bias, -40.0 cells/microl; 95% CI, -165.1 to+85.1 cells/microl). The correlation of the CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts obtained by the two bead-based systems was high (R(2)=0.98). Interestingly, CyFlow(green) yielded CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts that were 21.8 and 7.2 cells/microl lower than those obtained with the TruCOUNT and the FACSCount systems, respectively, when CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts were <250 CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts/microl range or 17.3 and 5.8 cells/microl less, respectively, when CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts were <200 cells/microl. The single-parameter CyFlow(green) volumetric technology performed well in comparison with the performance of the standard SP bead-based FCM system. However, a multicenter comparative study is needed before this FCM machine is implemented in resource-limited settings.     

Clinical field site evaluation of the FACSCount for absolute CD3+, CD3+ CD4+, and CD3+ CD8+ cell count determinations in Thailand.

The FACSCount flow cytometer absolute CD3+, CD3+ CD4+, and CD3+ CD8+ cell counts measured at a field site hospital laboratory in Thailand were compared to FACScan absolute counts obtained at a nearby research laboratory. Correlation coefficients for 208 samples were > or = 0.95. The FACSCount was accurate, and it was easier and less expensive to operate than the FACScan. Additionally, the FACScan-generated lymphocyte percentage value was accurate for use with the FACScan SimulSET software.     

Evaluation of a New Single-Parameter Volumetric Flow Cytometer (CyFlowgreen) for Enumeration of Absolute CD4+ T Lymphocytes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Thai Patients

Use of the standard dual-platform flow cytometric method for determination of CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts, which needs both a flow cytometer (FCM) and hematological analyzer, would inevitably lead to increased variability. The development of new single-platform (SP) FCMs that provide direct CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts for improved assay precision and accuracy have recently attracted attention. This study evaluated one of those systems, CyFlow^green (Partec), a single-parameter SP volumetric FCM. The performance of CyFlow^green was compared with those of two reference standard SP microbead-based technologies of the three-color TruCOUNT tube with the FACScan FCM and a two-color FACSCount system (Becton Dickinson Biosciences). Absolute CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-lymphocyte counts in 200 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive blood specimens were determined. Statistical analysis for correlation and agreement were performed. A high correlation of absolute CD4 counts was shown when those obtained with CyFlow^green were compared with those obtained with the bead-based three-color TruCOUNT system (R² = 0.96; mean bias, −69.1 cells/μl; 95% confidence interval [CI], −225.7 to +87.5 cells/μl) and the FACSCount system (R² = 0.97; mean bias, −40.0 cells/μl; 95% CI, −165.1 to +85.1 cells/μl). The correlation of the CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts obtained by the two bead-based systems was high (R² = 0.98). Interestingly, CyFlow^green yielded CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts that were 21.8 and 7.2 cells/μl lower than those obtained with the TruCOUNT and the FACSCount systems, respectively, when CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts were <250 CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts/μl range or 17.3 and 5.8 cells/μl less, respectively, when CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte counts were <200 cells/μl. The single-parameter CyFlow^greenvolumetric technology performed well in comparison with the performance of the standard SP bead-based FCM system. However, a multicenter comparative study is needed before this FCM machine is implemented in resource-limited settings.     

Evaluation of the Partec flow cytometer against the BD FACSCalibur system for monitoring immune responses of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Zimbabwe

A single-platform volumetric flow cytometer, the Partec Cyflow SL_3, was evaluated against a BD FACSCalibur/Sysmex XT1800i dual platform for measuring CD4(+) lymphocytes, total lymphocytes, and the percentage of CD4 lymphocytes in whole-blood samples for monitoring the immune systems of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS patients. Statistical analyses for precision, correlation, and agreement were performed. Coefficients of variation (CV) of 5.8, 4.6, and 3.9% were obtained for low, medium, and high CD4(+) cell counts, respectively, using the SL_3, and CV of 3.7, 4.0, and 0.94 were obtained for the same categories, using the BD FACSCalibur. Significant correlations (P < 0.005) between the two assays for CD4 counts, total lymphocyte counts, and percentages of CD4 were obtained, with correlation coefficients of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.99, respectively (n = 229). Using the Bland-Altman plot, mean biases of -18 cell/microl (95% confidence interval (CI); -91 to 54 cells/microl), -0.8% (95% CI; -3.6 to 2%), and -36.8 cells/microl (95% CI; -477 to 404 cells/microl) were obtained for comparisons of CD4 counts, percentages of CD4 cells, and total lymphocyte counts, respectively. The effects of the age of the samples on the three parameters were also analyzed by comparing results from the same samples analyzed at 6, 24, and 48 h after collection. The correlation coefficients for comparisons among different time points for the same machine and among all the time points for the two different machines were greater than 0.90. These data showed that the Partec Cyflow SL_3 assay is comparable to the BD FACSCalibur/Sysmex XT1800i dual-platform method for measuring the amount of CD4(+) cells and total lymphocytes and the percentages of CD4 cells in blood samples for the purpose of monitoring HIV/AIDS patients.     

Validation of primary CD4 gating as an affordable strategy for absolute CD4 counting in Cambodia

OBJECTIVE: To validate primary CD4 gating in lysed whole blood for absolute CD4 counts in fresh and aged blood using an affordable compact volumetric commercial flow cytometer. DESIGN: Comparison of CD4 counts between the FACSCount and the 2-parameter CyFlow SL Green. METHODS: One hundred twenty fresh blood samples from patients likely to be infected with HIV were simultaneously run on a FACSCount at the Pasteur Institute of Cambodia and on a CyFlow SL Green at the Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope (SHCH), Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Intra- and interrun precision was assessed using 2 blood samples. Stability of CD4 counting in blood stored up to 96 hours at room temperature was assessed using 27 blood samples. RESULTS: CD4 counts on the CyFlow SL Green and on the FACSCount correlated well apart from a relative bias (R = 0.993, bias of -9.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.8% to -7.1%, limits of agreement: -32.5% to 13.6%). Intra- and interrun variability ranged from 3% to 5% and from 5% to 6%, respectively. CD4 counts on aged blood using the CyFlow SL Green showed an interassay variability of <10%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary CD4 gating in lysed whole blood using the CyFlow SL Green is an affordable and precise method for CD4 counting. Because the fluorescence (FL) and light scatter signals have to be analyzed manually, however, intensive training of the technician and/or operator is imperative.     

Change from dual- to single-platform reporting of CD4/CD8 values: experience from a small district general hospital laboratory

Accurate and reliable CD4 and CD8 counts are essential for monitoring HIV disease progression or successful therapy. CD4 and CD8 counts can be determined on a flow cytometer by either single- or dual-platform technology. Dual-platform technology uses a haematology analyser to obtain a total white cell count and lymphocyte absolute count. CD4 and CD8 absolute values are then calculated from the CD4 and CD8 percentage positive results obtained from the flow cytometer. Single-platform technology uses latex beads of a predefined concentration, which are added to the blood sample immediately before flow cytometric analysis, thereby removing the need to use an additional analyser. Recent recommendations propose that single-platform technology should be the gold standard for CD4 measurement because it offers better inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs). Before changing to single-platform technology in our department, CD4 and CD8 absolute counts, determined on 20 healthy volunteers, were used to establish new normal ranges for single-platform technology (Coulter epics XL), permitting absolute value data for dual-platform and single-platform technologies to be compared. Data obtained with single-platform technology was significantly higher for both CD4 and CD8 (P=0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). For CD4, mean single-platform value was 0.993 x 10(9)/L (+SD = 0.510-1.376) and dual-platform value was 0.920 x 10(9)/L (+SD = 0.500-1.340). For CD8, single-platform value was 0.483 x 10(9)/L, (+SD = 0.207-0.756) and dual-platform value was 0.457 x 10(9)/L (+SD = 0.222-0.692). Thus, the differences between dual- and single-platform absolute CD4 and CD8 results were small (8% and 6%, respectively) but significant. It is important, therefore, that clinicians closely monitoring CD4 and CD8 values and are informed of any laboratory changes.     

Validation of a Single-Platform, Volumetric, CD45-Assisted PanLeucogating Auto40 Flow Cytometer To Determine the Absolute Number and Percentages of CD4 T Cells in Resource-Constrained Settings Using Cameroonian Patients' Samples

The study evaluated the single-platform, volumetric, CD45-assisted PanLeucogating Auto40 flow cytometer (Apogee Flow Systems Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom) for CD4 T cell numeration, compared to the reference FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Results of absolute counts and percentages of CD4 T cells by Auto40 and FACSCalibur of 234 tripotassium EDTA (K3-EDTA)-blood samples from 146 adults and 88 children (aged from 18 months to 5 years), living in Yaoundé, Cameroon, were highly correlated (r² = 0.97 and r² = 0.98, respectively). The mean absolute bias and relative bias between Apogee Auto40 and FACSCalibur absolute CD4 T cell counts were +9.6 cells/μl, with limits of agreement from −251 to 270 cells/μl, and +4.1%, with limits of agreement from −16.1 to 24.4%, respectively. The mean absolute bias and relative bias between Apogee Auto40 and FACSCalibur CD4 T cell results expressed as percentages were +0.05% CD4 (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.03 to 0.41), with limits of agreement from −6.0 to 5.9% CD4, and +1.0%, with limits of agreement from −32.3 to 34.4%, respectively. The Auto40 counting allowed identification of the majority of adults with CD4 T cell counts below 200 cells/μl (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 98%) or below 350 cells/μl (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 98%) and of children with CD4 T cell counts below 750 cells/μl (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 98%) or below 25% CD4⁺ (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 99%). The Auto40 analyzer is a reliable alternative flow cytometer for CD4 T lymphocyte enumeration to be used in routine immunological monitoring according to the WHO recommendations for HIV-infected adults as well as children living in resource-constrained settings.     

Multisite Comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-Lymphocyte Counting by Single- versus Multiple-Platform Methodologies: Evaluation of Beckman Coulter Flow-Count Fluorospheres and the tetraONE System

New analytic methods that permit absolute CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations to be performed entirely on the flow cytometer have the potential for improving assay precision and accuracy. In a multisite trial, we compared two different single-platform assay methods with a predicate two-color assay in which the absolute lymphocyte count was derived by conventional hematology. A two-color method employing lymphocyte light scatter gating and Beckman Coulter Flow-Count fluorospheres for absolute counting produced within-laboratory precision equivalent to that of the two-color predicate method, as measured by coefficient of variation of replicate measurements. The fully automated Beckman Coulter tetraONE System four-color assay employing CD45 lymphocyte gating, automated analysis, and absolute counting by fluorospheres resulted in a small but significant improvement in the within-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 cell counts and percentages suggesting that the CD45 lymphocyte gating and automated analysis might have contributed to the improved performance. Both the two-color method employing Flow-Count fluorospheres and the four-color tetraONE System provided significant and substantial improvements in between-laboratory precision of absolute counts. In some laboratories, absolute counts obtained by the single-platform methods showed small but consistent differences relative to the predicate method. Comparison of each laboratory's absolute counts with the five-laboratory median value suggested that these differences resulted from a bias in the absolute lymphocyte count obtained from the hematology instrument in some laboratories. These results demonstrate the potential for single-platform assay methods to improve within-laboratory and between-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations compared with conventional assay methods.     

Multisite comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte counting by single- versus multiple-platform methodologies: evaluation of Beckman Coulter flow-count fluorospheres and the tetraONE system. The NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group

New analytic methods that permit absolute CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations to be performed entirely on the flow cytometer have the potential for improving assay precision and accuracy. In a multisite trial, we compared two different single-platform assay methods with a predicate two-color assay in which the absolute lymphocyte count was derived by conventional hematology. A two-color method employing lymphocyte light scatter gating and Beckman Coulter Flow-Count fluorospheres for absolute counting produced within-laboratory precision equivalent to that of the two-color predicate method, as measured by coefficient of variation of replicate measurements. The fully automated Beckman Coulter tetraONE System four-color assay employing CD45 lymphocyte gating, automated analysis, and absolute counting by fluorospheres resulted in a small but significant improvement in the within-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 cell counts and percentages suggesting that the CD45 lymphocyte gating and automated analysis might have contributed to the improved performance. Both the two-color method employing Flow-Count fluorospheres and the four-color tetraONE System provided significant and substantial improvements in between-laboratory precision of absolute counts. In some laboratories, absolute counts obtained by the single-platform methods showed small but consistent differences relative to the predicate method. Comparison of each laboratory's absolute counts with the five-laboratory median value suggested that these differences resulted from a bias in the absolute lymphocyte count obtained from the hematology instrument in some laboratories. These results demonstrate the potential for single-platform assay methods to improve within-laboratory and between-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations compared with conventional assay methods.     

Affordable CD4(+)-T-cell counting by flow cytometry: CD45 gating for volumetric analysis

The flow cytometers that are currently supported by industry provide accurate CD4(+)-T-cell counts for monitoring human immunodeficiency virus disease but remain unaffordable for routine service work under resource-poor conditions. We therefore combined volumetric flow cytometry (measuring absolute lymphocyte counts in unit volumes of blood) and simpler protocols with generic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to increase cost efficiency. Volumetric absolute counts were generated using CD45/CD4 and CD45/CD8 MAb combinations in two parallel tubes. The percentage values for the various subsets were also determined within the leukocyte and lymphocyte populations utilizing a fully automated protocol. The levels of agreement between the newly developed method and the present industry standards, including both volumetric and bead-based systems using a full MAb panel for subset analysis, were tested by Bland-Altman analyses. The limits of agreement for CD4 counts generated by the volumetric methods using either CD45/CD4 (in a single tube) or the full Trio MAb panel (in three tubes) on the CytoronAbsolute flow cytometer were between -29 and +46 cells/mm(3) with very little bias for CD4 counts (in favor of the Trio method: +8 CD4(+) lymphocytes/mm(3); 0.38% of lymphocytes). The limits of agreement for absolute CD4 counts yielded by the volumetric CD45/CD4 method and the bead-based method were between -118 and +98 cells/mm(3), again with a negligible bias (-10 CD4(+) lymphocytes/mm(3)). In the volumetric method using CD45/CD8, the strongly CD8(+) cells were gated and the levels of agreement with the full Trio showed a minor bias (in favor of the Trio; +40 CD8(+) cells/mm(3); 5.2% of lymphocytes) without a significant influence on CD4/CD8 ratios. One trained flow cytometrist was able to process 300 to 400 stained tubes per day. This workload extrapolates to a throughput of >30,000 samples per year if both CD45/CD4 and CD45/CD8 stainings are performed for each patient or a throughput of >60,000 samples if only CD45/CD4 counts are tested in a single tube. Thus, on the basis of the high efficiency and excellent agreement with the present industry standards, volumetric flow cytometers with automated gating protocols and autobiosamplers, complemented by generic CD45, CD4, and CD8 MAbs used in two-color immunofluorescence, represent the most suitable arrangements for large regional laboratories in resource-poor settings.     

A flow cytometric method for determination of absolute counts of myeloid precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood

Circulating precursor dendritic cells (pDCs) constitute a rare population in peripheral blood. They have a typical immunophenotypic profile, yet, they cannot be identified by pDC-specific immunophenotypic markers and therefore, their accurate and absolute enumeration poses a challenge. Here, we report a method for the evaluation of absolute counts of myeloid pDC in minimally manipulated blood samples on a flow cytometer as a single platform. Three-color flow cytometry was done to identify myeloid pDC as CD33+ HLA-DR+ CD14/CD16(dim/negative) cells in commercially available TruCount trade mark tubes that contain a defined number of brightly fluorescent polystyrene beads. The normal range in peripheral blood of 41 healthy adults, as determined by this single-platform method, was 17.0+/-5.7 x 10(6)/l, or 0.64+/-0.23% of mononuclear cells (MNCs). In parallel experiments, we have compared our procedure with two published 'dual-platform' methods that derive the absolute pDC count from a relative number obtained by flow cytometry, and from absolute counts obtained from a haematological analyser. Regression analysis showed an excellent correlation between results obtained with our single-platform protocol and these double-platform procedures (R2 > or = 0.90). However, the values obtained by the single-platform method were significantly higher than those obtained by the dual-platform methods. The higher myeloid pDC numbers in this single-platform procedure are likely due to reduced cell loss in this 'lyse-no-wash' protocol compared with the other methods which include density gradient separation and centrifugation steps. The intra- and interassay variability were 4.4% (range, 2.04-8.96%) and 5.8% (range, 2.59-9.65%), respectively. Thus, the single-platform method described here allows accurate, rapid and simple measurement of circulating blood myeloid pDC and is suitable for routine enumeration of circulating myeloid pDC.     

Evaluation of a single-platform technology for lymphocyte immunophenotyping

An accurate and reproducible CD4 count is a fundamental clinical tool for monitoring and treating human immunodeficiency virus infection and its complications. Two methods exist for calculating absolute CD4 counts: dual-platform technology (DPT) and single-platform technology (SPT). Numerous studies have documented the unacceptably wide range of variation in absolute CD4 counts between laboratories. SPT was introduced in 1996 to reduce the interlaboratory variation in absolute CD4 counts. The aim of this study was to compare DPT with the BD Biosciences Trucount method (an SPT method). Both the percentages of CD4 (r = 0.986; P = 0.0541) and the absolute CD4 counts (r = 0.960; P = 0.0001) had very good correlation between the two methods. However, poor correlation was observed for the CD8(+) RO(-) (r = 0.314; P = 0.0002), CD8(+) DR(+) (r = 0.666; P = 0.0138), CD3(+) CD38(+) (r = 0.8000; P = 0.0004), CD3(+) CD25(+) (r = 0.464; P = 0.0082), and CD4(+) CD38(+) (r = 0.357; P = 0.0127) measurements.     

Affordable CD4+-T-Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry: CD45 Gating for Volumetric Analysis

The flow cytometers that are currently supported by industry provide accurate CD4⁺-T-cell counts for monitoring human immunodeficiency virus disease but remain unaffordable for routine service work under resource-poor conditions. We therefore combined volumetric flow cytometry (measuring absolute lymphocyte counts in unit volumes of blood) and simpler protocols with generic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to increase cost efficiency. Volumetric absolute counts were generated using CD45/CD4 and CD45/CD8 MAb combinations in two parallel tubes. The percentage values for the various subsets were also determined within the leukocyte and lymphocyte populations utilizing a fully automated protocol. The levels of agreement between the newly developed method and the present industry standards, including both volumetric and bead-based systems using a full MAb panel for subset analysis, were tested by Bland-Altman analyses. The limits of agreement for CD4 counts generated by the volumetric methods using either CD45/CD4 (in a single tube) or the full Trio MAb panel (in three tubes) on the CytoronAbsolute flow cytometer were between −29 and +46 cells/mm³ with very little bias for CD4 counts (in favor of the Trio method: +8 CD4⁺ lymphocytes/mm³; 0.38% of lymphocytes). The limits of agreement for absolute CD4 counts yielded by the volumetric CD45/CD4 method and the bead-based method were between −118 and +98 cells/mm³, again with a negligible bias (−10 CD4⁺ lymphocytes/mm³). In the volumetric method using CD45/CD8, the strongly CD8⁺ cells were gated and the levels of agreement with the full Trio showed a minor bias (in favor of the Trio; +40 CD8⁺ cells/mm³; 5.2% of lymphocytes) without a significant influence on CD4/CD8 ratios. One trained flow cytometrist was able to process 300 to 400 stained tubes per day. This workload extrapolates to a throughput of >30,000 samples per year if both CD45/CD4 and CD45/CD8 stainings are performed for each patient or a throughput of >60,000 samples if only CD45/CD4 counts are tested in a single tube. Thus, on the basis of the high efficiency and excellent agreement with the present industry standards, volumetric flow cytometers with automated gating protocols and autobiosamplers, complemented by generic CD45, CD4, and CD8 MAbs used in two-color immunofluorescence, represent the most suitable arrangements for large regional laboratories in resource-poor settings.     

Simultaneous determination of absolute total lymphocyte and CD4+ lymphocyte levels in peripheral blood by flow cytometry

A distinguishing feature of the Spectrum III flow cytometer is its capacity to analyze a constant volume of cell suspension. The authors have capitalized on this feature to directly and simultaneously measure the absolute numbers of all lymphocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes per microliter of peripheral blood. The study group consisted of 42 hospital patients, 12 former blood donors seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and 12 HIV-seronegative donors. Regression analysis revealed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.97) between Spectrum lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte counts determined by a Coulter Counter S-Plus IV. Similarly, Spectrum CD4 cell counts were significantly correlated (r = 0.98) with CD4 cell counts calculated from the Coulter lymphocyte counts and % CD4+ lymphocytes determined by flow cytometry. These findings indicate that the absolute numbers of lymphocytes and subsets of lymphocytes in peripheral blood can be rapidly and simultaneously measured by flow cytometry. Such an assay should prove useful in studies of HIV infection, where total lymphocyte and CD4 cell levels are important parameters for clinical staging and assessing responses to treatment.     

Evaluation of a flow cytometry method for CD4 T cell enumeration based on volumetric primary CD4 gating using thermoresistant reagents

Laboratory follow-up of HIV patients in resource-limited settings requires appropriate instruments for CD4 T cell enumeration. In this study, we evaluated the application of a simplified, mobile and robust flow cytometry system, the Apogee Auto 40 analyzer (Auto40) using thermoresistant reagents, for CD4 T cell enumeration. We measured the absolute CD4 counts in fresh whole blood samples from 170 Senegalese subjects, including 129 HIV-positive (HIV+) patients and 41 HIV-negative (HIV-) controls. Based on volumetric primary CD4 gating, cells were stained with commercially available reagents (Easy MoAb CD4;Bio-D, Valenzano, Italy) and analyzed on the Auto40. The results were compared with those from the FACSCount system (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, USA). Repeatability analysis was performed on duplicate testing of 49 samples on both FACSCount and Auto40. The intra-run precision was measured by 10 replicates using 3 clinical blood samples with low, intermediate and high CD4 concentrations. The results from the two instruments were in good agreement. The percent similarity between the results of both instruments was 99%±relative standard deviation of 12.7%. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.99. The absolute bias and limits of agreement (LOA) between the two instruments, calculated by Bland-Altman analysis, were clinically acceptable (bias: +4 cells/μl; LOA: -111 to +120 cells/μl). The clinical agreement between the two instruments at a cutoff of 200 CD4 cells/μl was 94%. The repeatability of measurements on the Auto40 was also similar to that observed with FACSCount system (bias +0.1 cells/μl, coefficient of variation 2.5% vs bias -1.1cells/μl, coefficient of variation 2.9% respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that the Auto 40 system, using thermoresistant reagents, is suitable for CD4 T cell enumeration and will be a helpful tool to improve HIV laboratory monitoring in resource-limited settings.     

Evaluation of a low-cost method, the Guava EasyCD4 assay, to enumerate CD4-positive lymphocyte counts in HIV-infected patients in the United States and Uganda

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the EasyCD4 assay, a less expensive method to enumerate CD4+ lymphocytes, in resource-limited settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study conducted in the United States and Uganda. METHODS: We compared CD4+ cell counts obtained on replicate samples from HIV-infected patients by the EasyCD4 assay, a microcapillary flow-based system, and by standard flow cytometry or FACSCount with linear regression and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen samples were analyzed (77 in the United States and 141 in Uganda). In the United States, mean +/- SD CD4 was 697 +/- 438 cells/microL by standard flow cytometry and 688 +/- 451 cells/microL by EasyCD4. In Uganda, the mean +/- SD CD4 was 335 +/- 331 cells/microL by FACSCount and 340 +/- 327 cells/microL by EasyCD4. The 2 methods were highly correlated (US cohort, r2 = 0.97, slope = 1.0, intercept = -18; Ugandan cohort, r2 = 0.92; slope = 0.95; intercept = 23). The mean differences in CD4 cell counts were 9.0 and -4.6 cells/microL for the US and Ugandan cohorts, respectively, and they were not significant in either cohort. In the Ugandan cohort, sensitivity and specificity of the EasyCD4 for CD4 below 200 cells/microL were 90% and 98%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 96%; negative predictive value was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EasyCD4 may be used with high positive and negative predictive value in resource-limited settings.     

A reliable and inexpensive EasyCD4 assay for monitoring HIV-infected individuals in resource-limited settings

Serial measurements of absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts are required to initiate and gauge response to therapy and monitor disease progression. Hence, there is an urgent need to evaluate the accuracy and validity of low-cost CD4+ T-cell count assays. Tripotassium EDTA blood specimens from HIV-infected individuals were studied using a novel flow cytometric assay (EasyCD4 assay; Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) in comparison with standard flow cytometry (FACSCount; Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). The sensitivity, specificity value by EasyCD4 assay in enumerating absolute CD4+ T-cell counts of less than 200 cells/microL were 95% and 100%, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed close agreement, with the EasyCD4 assay yielding CD4+ T-cell counts a mean difference of -26 cells/microL (95% confidence interval, -96 to 44 cells/microL) higher than by flow cytometry. Our data suggest that EasyCD4 assay could be a useful alternative assay to conventional flow cytometry, may be appropriate for use in resource-limited settings.     

An immunomagnetic single-platform image cytometer for cell enumeration based on antibody specificity

Simplification of cell enumeration technologies is necessary, especially for resource-poor countries, where reliable and affordable enumeration systems are greatly needed. In this paper, an immunomagnetic single-platform image cytometer (SP ICM) for cell enumeration based on antibody specificity is reported. A chamber/magnet assembly was designed such that the immunomagnetically labeled, acridine orange-stained cells in a blood sample moved to the surface of the chamber, where a fluorescent image was captured and analyzed for cell enumeration. The system was evaluated by applying one kind of antibody to count leukocytes and one kind for each leukocyte subpopulation: CD45 for leukocytes, CD3 for T lymphocytes, and CD19 for B lymphocytes. Excellent precision and linearity were achieved. Moreover, these cell counts, each from blood specimens of 42 to 52 randomly selected patients, were compared with those obtained by SP (TruCount) and dual-platform (DP) flow cytometry (FCM) technologies. The cell counts obtained by our system were in between those obtained from the TruCount and DP FCM methods; and good correlations were achieved (R > or = 0.95). For CD4(+) counts, as we expected, the cell count by our system was significantly higher than the CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts obtained by SP and DP FCM methods. Immunophenotyping of the immunomagnetically selected CD4(+) cells showed that, besides CD4(+) T lymphocytes, a proportion of the CD4(+) dim monocytes was also selected. Our system is a simple immunomagnetic SP ICM, which can potentially be used for enumeration of CD3(+) CD4(+) T lymphocytes in resource-poor countries if an additional CD3 immunofluorescent label is applied.     

Affordable CD4+ T cell counts by flow cytometry. II. The use of fixed whole blood in resource-poor settings.

We tested the feasibility and precision of affordable CD4+ T cell counting in resource-poor settings using a recently standardised fixative, TransFix in whole blood (WB) by flow cytometry (FCM). The precision of the assays was established under optimal conditions for single-platform FCM such as the volumetric CytoronAbsolute and the bead-based FACSCan. Fresh WB samples from HIV-seropositive and seronegative patients were tested in Tanzania and South Africa, fixed and sent to the UK for reanalysis 7 days later. Correlation, bias and limits of agreements were analysed by linear regression and the Bland-Altman test. Absolute CD4+ T cell counts remained stable for at least 10 days when TransFix was added to WB in 1:10 dilution at 20-25 degrees C, and for 7 days when added in 1:10 or 1:5 dilution to samples stored to mimic 'tropical' conditions at 37 degrees C. Higher temperatures such as 42 degrees C were tolerated for only short periods since the recovery had decreased to 63% by day 3. The reproducibility of lymphocyte subset analysis remained unchanged by TransFix with coefficient of variations <6% for all T cell subsets. Absolute CD4+ T cell counts and CD4+ T cell % values on fixed samples in the UK showed a high correlation with the results using fresh samples in Tanzania (r=0.993 and 0.969, respectively) and with the samples handled in Johannesburg (r=0.991 and 0.981) with minimal bias. Primary CD4 gating using only a single CD4 antibody also remained accurate in TransFixed samples (r=0.999). Thus, TransFix permits optimal fixation and transport of WB samples in the developing world for FCM to local regional laboratories and for quality assurance in international centres. When used together with inexpensive primary CD4 gating, TransFix will allow reliable and affordable CD4+ T cell counting by FCM in resource-poor settings.     

A single-platform approach using flow cytometry and microbeads to evaluate immune reconstitution in mice after bone marrow transplantation

The monitoring of immune reconstitution in murine models of HC transplantation, using accurate and automated methods, is necessary in view of the recent developments of hematopoietic cell (HC) transplantation (including reduced intensity conditioning regimens) as well as emerging immunological concepts (such as the involvement of dendritic cells or regulatory T cells). Here, we describe the use of a single-platform approach based on flow cytometry and tubes that contain a defined number of microbeads to evaluate absolute blood cell counts in mice. This method, previously used in humans to quantify CD34+ stem cells or CD4+ T cells in HIV infected patients, was adapted for mouse blood samples. A CD45 gating strategy in this "lyse no wash" protocol makes it possible to discriminate erythroblasts or red blood cell debris from CD45+ leukocytes, thus avoiding cell loss. Tubes contain a lyophilized brightly fluorescent microbead pellet permitting the acquisition of absolute counts of leukocytes after flow cytometric analysis. We compared this method to determine absolute counts of circulating cells with another method combining Unopette reservoir diluted blood samples, hemocytometer, microscopic examination and flow cytometry. The sensitivity of this single-platform approach was evaluated in different situations encountered in allogeneic HC transplantation, including immune cell depletion after different conditioning regimens, activation status of circulating cells after transplantation, evaluation of in vivo cell depletion and hematopoietic progenitor mobilization in the periphery. This single-platform flow cytometric assay can also be proposed to standardize murine (or other mammalian species) leukocyte count determination for physiological, pharmacological/toxicological and diagnostic applications in veterinary practice.