炎症可能是支架内再狭窄发生的重要机制

冠心病是目前西方国家引起死亡的主要原因,这一状况在将来相当长的时间内仍持续存在.冠心病现代综合治疗主要包括危险因素的控制、药物治疗及血运重建技术.     

冠状动脉内支架内再狭窄的机制认识及防治

冠心病已成为危害人类健康最常见、最严重的疾病之一。自1977年Gruentzig在瑞士苏黎世完成第1例经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术(percutaneous transcoronary coronary angioplasty,PTCA)以来,介入治疗已成为治疗冠心病的有效手段,其发展迅速,但PTCA术后再狭窄高达50％,裸金属支架植入术后高达20％-30％,药物洗脱支架植入术后仍然达5％-10％,防止再狭窄是提高疗效的关键,再狭窄一直困扰着临床医师和科研工作者。     

Delayed restenosis after gamma brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis

Intracoronary brachytherapy is a promising modality for inhibition of in-stent restenosis. However, there is a concern of late progression after brachytherapy. This case report describes delayed restenosis after brachytherapy.     

Stenting for in-stent restenosis.

Intravascular ultrasound studies have shown that additional stent implantation is the only percutaneous technique that allows for recovery of all the lumen area of the original implantation procedure. Despite this theoretical advantage, information on systematic additional stent implantation is still forthcoming, especially concerning the impact of new stent designs. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of routine additional stent implantation for treatment of in-stent restenosis in 68 consecutive patients. Repeat stenting was successful in all cases, and second-generation tubular stents were used in 84% of patients. The mean additional stent length was 19.2 +/- 9.4 mm, and 15% of patients had multiple stent implantation. The postprocedure minimum lumen diameter was 3.11 +/- 0.41 mm, and the percentage residual stenosis was 2% +/- 7%. At a mean clinical follow-up of 10 +/- 8 months (follow-up rate 100%), the incidence of major adverse events was 21% (1 death, 13 target vessel revascularizations). Overall, angiographic restenosis rate was 32% (angiographic follow-up rate 79%). By multivariate analysis, the only predictors of recurrence after additional stenting were unstable angina at the second procedure (OR 8.70, 95% CI 1.50-50.33, P = 0.019), and early clinical recurrence after the first stent procedure (OR 4.83, 95% CI 1.13-20.71, P = 0.038). Additional stenting is a safe and effective treatment modality for the majority of patients with in-stent restenosis. Alternative treatments should be considered only for patients with in-stent restenosis presenting as unstable angina or early recurrence after a first stent procedure.     

Myocardial infarction as a presentation of clinical in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis is considered to be a gradual and progressive condition and there is scant data on myocardial infarction (MI) as a clinical presentation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 2,462 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between June 2001 and December 2002, clinical in-stent restenosis occurred in 212 (8.6%), who were classified into 3 groups: ST elevation MI (STEMI), non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) and non-MI. Of the 212 patients presenting with clinical in-stent restenosis, 22 (10.4%) had MI (creatine kinase (CK)>or=2xbaseline with elevated CKMB). The remaining 190 (89.6%) patients had stable angina or evidence of ischemia by stress test without elevation of cardiac enzymes. Median interval between previous intervention and presentation for clinical in-stent restenosis was shorter for patients with MI than for non-MI patients (STEMI, 90 days; NSTEMI, 79 days; non-MI, 125 days; p=0.07). Diffuse in-stent restenosis was more frequent in MI patients than in non-MI patients (72.7% vs 56.3%; p<0.005). Renal failure was more prevalent in patients with MI than in those without MI (31.8% vs 6.3%, p=0.001). Compared with the non-MI group, patients with MI were more likely to have acute coronary syndromes at the time of index procedure (81.8% vs 56.8%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Clinical in-stent restenosis can frequently present as MI and such patients are more likely to have an aggressive angiographic pattern of restenosis. Renal failure and acute coronary syndromes at the initial procedure are associated with MI.     

白细胞介素与支架内再狭窄

支架置入术后的支架内再狭窄是困扰动脉粥样硬化性心脑血管病微侵袭介入治疗发展的主要问题.支架置入术后的血管内炎症反应是再狭窄的重要原因之一.其中,以白细胞介素为代表的细胞因子起着复杂和多变的作用.文章综述了白细胞介素表达水平对血管内皮增生的作用以及对支架内再狭窄发生率的影响.     

Inflammation and delayed endothelization with overlapping drug-eluting stents in a porcine model of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the inflammatory reaction at the site of overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) in a porcine model of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty bare metal stents (BMS) (group I; n=10), 20 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (group II: n=10), 20 paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (group III: n=10), and 10 PES and 10 SES (group IV: n=10) were overlapped in the left anterior descending coronary arteries of 40 pigs. Follow-up coronary angiography and histopathology were performed at 4 weeks after stenting. For the overlapped segments, the minimal luminal diameter at 4 weeks was smaller in group I than in the other groups (1.78+/-0.13 mm, 2.79+/-0.09 mm, 2.90+/-0.04 mm, 2.80+/-0.07 mm, respectively; p<0.001), and the neointimal area (5.51+/-0.58 mm2, 2.38+/-0.53 mm2, 2.07+/-0.37 mm2, 2.39+/-0.58 mm2, respectively; p<0.001) and area stenosis (68.74+/-4.02%, 27.79+/-4.73%, 23.66+/-3.24%, 27.63+/-4.07%, respectively; p<0.001) were higher in group I than in the other groups; however, the inflammatory score was higher in group III than in the other groups (1.80+/-0.42, 2.10+/-0.32, 2.90+/-0.31, 2.50+/-0.52, respectively; p<0.001) and the endothelization score was lower in group III than in the other groups (2.80+/-0.42, 2.30+/-0.67, 1.30+/-0.48, 2.10+/-0.74, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with BMS, DES inhibit neointimal hyperplasia, but inflammation and poor endothelization occur at the site of overlapping stents.     

Late restenosis following placement of a sirolimus eluting stent for in-stent restenosis

Drug eluting stents (DES) are rapidly replacing intravascular brachytherapy for the treatment of bare metal in-stent restenosis (ISR). To date, there are no long-term follow up data supporting this practise. We report symptomatic repeat in-stent restenosis occurring 27 months after sirolimus eluting stent deployment for de novo in-stent restenosis. This case suggests that in a subgroup of patients with ISR, as with brachytherapy, the drug eluting stent may be simply delaying rather than inhibiting the restenotic process.     

Carotid brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis.

Carotid stenting has emerged as an alternative revascularization modality to endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery disease. Restenosis of a carotid stent may be occasionally seen. Our experience in intravascular radiation therapy for coronary restenosis has provided us the opportunity to explore this treatment strategy for carotid restenosis. We report our initial experience with brachytherapy for the treatment of restenosis after carotid stenting.     

Brachytherapy for rental artery in-stent restenosis

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting is now an established modality for treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. However, the rate of restenosis can be as high as 20%. While intravascular brachytherapy has proven efficacy in coronary artery in-stent stenosis, its role in the treatment of renal artery in-stent stenosis is not well understood. We report a case of recurrent in-stent renal artery stenosis treated successfully by brachytherapy with excellent follow up results at 22 months.     

High-speed rotational ablation for in-stent restenosis

High-speed rotational ablation was used to treat in-stent restenosis in 10 consecutive patients with a total of 12 in-stent restenosis lesions. Seven lesions required adjunctive PTCA and five were stand alone results. No patient experienced a complication of the procedure. This small consecutive series demonstrates the feasibility of the technique and its potential application to the management of this increasingly common clinical problem. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 40:144–149, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Beta-radiation for coronary in-stent restenosis.

To determine the feasibility and safety of an intracoronary beta-radiation device in preventing the recurrence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after successful angioplasty, we studied 37 patients treated with beta-radiation (30-mm strontium-90 source) after angioplasty. The mean reference diameter was 2.9 +/- 0.5 mm, and 62% of lesions were diffuse, including four total occlusions. Beta-radiation was successfully delivered in 36 of 37 (97%) cases. Over the course of 7.1 +/- 4.5 mo follow-up, there were no myocardial infarctions and three deaths: one from preexisting malignancy, one from progressive cardiac failure, and one from sudden cardiac death. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was performed in seven of 36 (19%) patients. Thirty patients underwent angiography at 6 mo; three (10%) experienced restenosis (diameter stenosis > 50%) at the target site, four (13%) had edge stenoses, and two (7%) had late (> 1 mo) thrombotic occlusions. Beta-radiation for ISR is associated with encouragingly low rates of target lesion restenosis and TVR. Further improvements are needed to solve the limitations of the edge effect and late occlusion.     

The cutting balloon for in-stent restenosis: a review

Extraordinary advances have been made in the prevention, medical treatment, and the surgical and percutaneous intervention of coronary artery disease. However, despite the vast contribution of coronary artery stenting, coronary artery disease remains a major health problem. The massive treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease with non-drug-eluting stents in the past, accounts for a large incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR). We know today that in the following days after coronary artery angioplasty, new layers of intimal cells, called neo-intima, scaffold the endothelium forming a rubbery membrane. Numerous attempts have been made, and are still ongoing, to prevent the formation or to remove the neo-intima with suboptimal results and cost-effectiveness. Drug-eluting stents seem to be the most promising approach to date, however, the high cost of these devices may limit their use. In the mean time, new cases of ISR present to our cardiology practices. Because of its lower cost and identical technique to a regular balloon, the cutting balloon has emerged in numerous observational studies, and in a few randomized studies as a practical alternative to treat ISR. Although a few randomized studies have compared angioplasty with the cutting balloon versus angioplasty with a regular balloon, there are no randomized or economic studies comparing this device to excimer laser or intracoronary radiation in the treatment of this complication of coronary stenting. We reviewed the most prominent studies to date, on the performance of the cutting balloon in the treatment of ISR.     

Intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis using long sources reduces restenosis

Edge restenosis (candy wrapper effect) and late thrombosis remain a problem in various randomized intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) trials for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR) and edge restenosis can be decreased with the use of longer ICBT sources and debulking devices and has not been systematically studied. We analyzed 226 patients with ISR (240 vessels of 264 lesions; average lesion length 17.5+/-8.9 mm) who had lesion debulking followed by 90 Strontium (Sr) beta-irradiation using the Novoste Betacath system (30 mm source in 144 vessels and 40 mm source in 96 vessels). Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for one year. At follow-up of 12+/-2 months, clinical TVR occurred in 9.7%, with TLR in 7.1% and non-TLR in 2.6% of cases. There was no delayed or late subacute thrombosis. Beta-irradiation using a longer 90Sr source after lesion modification with cutting balloon (CB) and or rotational atherectomy (RA), along with the use of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is safe and associated with single-digit clinical restenosis.     

Post-interventional homocysteine levels: failure as a predictive biomarker of in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: Purpose of our study was to determine if homocysteine plasma levels are related to the risk of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary stent implantation in de novo lesions. BACKGROUND: The putative role of homocysteine as a predictive cardiovascular biomarker of coronary artery disease is well established. The impact of homocysteine levels in the development of in-stent restenosis, however, is controversially discussed. METHODS: A total of 177 patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing stent implantation in coronary de novo lesions were included. Laboratory determination comprised blood sample evaluation for homocysteine and other conventional risk factors before baseline coronary intervention and prior to six months control catheterization. Binary restenosis, late lumen loss, and late loss index after six months were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Endpoints included target lesion and target vessel failure, homocysteine levels as well as major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the length of the implanted stent (p<0.006), the percentage of stenosis (p<0.003) and the pre-interventional luminal diameter (p<0.0001) with late loss index. Linear regression analysis demonstrated no significant impact of the initial or six months homocysteine levels on angiographic restenosis, late lumen loss, or late loss index. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to homocysteine levels, luminal diameter, stent length and percentage of stenosis correlated with the appearance of restenosis. Taking our data into consideration, we hypothesise that homocysteine may not serve as a safe and independent biomarker of in-stent restenosis after a six months period following percutaneous coronary stenting.     

Brachytherapy for renal artery in-stent restenosis.

We describe a 66-year-old female who presented with recurrent acute pulmonary edema and uncontrolled hypertension. She was diagnosed with left renal artery stenosis and treated with angioplasty and stent placement. Her clinical status improved initially but symptoms recurred within 4 months. Further evaluation documented renal artery in-stent restenosis, which was successfully treated with cutting balloon angioplasty followed by brachytherapy. The feasibility of renal artery brachytherapy and short-term follow-up is presented.