Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material

Twenty asymptomatic volunteers underwent helical computed tomographic (CT) cholangiography 10-12 hours after ingesting iopanoic acid. Three observers assessed the images for the extent of bile duct visualization and image quality. The common bile duct and common hepatic duct were adequately visualized in 19 (95%) subjects. Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material is feasible and deserves further clinical studies.     

MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts.

OBJECTIVE: We report our experience using MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography in pediatric patients with choledochal cysts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (two boys, 12 girls; mean age, 7.8 years) with either a preoperative diagnosis of choledochal cyst or a surgical finding of choledochal cyst underwent non-breath-hold MR cholangiography using T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo sequences with a 1.5-T magnet, and CT cholangiography with IV infusion of meglumine iodoxamic acid. Radiologic findings were correlated with findings from surgery, operative cholangiography, or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. RESULTS: The biliary tree was visualized in all 14 patients with MR cholangiography and in 13 patients (92.9%) with CT cholangiography. In the 11 preoperative cases of choledochal cyst, MR cholangiography correctly showed all cysts and CT cholangiography showed 10 cysts (90.9%). The quality of images on CT cholangiography and MR cholangiography was comparable. The sensitivity of CT cholangiography and MR cholangiography in revealing intrahepatic stones was 83.3% and 66.7%, respectively; the specificity for both techniques was 100%. The rate of detecting the pancreatic duct and the common channel by CT cholangiography and MR cholangiography was 63.6% and 45.5% respectively. After surgery, CT cholangiography was superior to MR cholangiography in revealing the location of biliary-enteric anastomosis and the extent of anastomotic narrowing. CONCLUSION: Because non-breath-hold MR cholangiography is not invasive and does not use ionizing radiation and potentially toxic contrast agents, it is recommended as the imaging technique of choice in children with choledochal cysts. CT cholangiography can be considered as an adjunct after surgery and in patients in whom MR cholangiography is unsatisfactory.     

Pancreatic carcinoma: MR, MR angiography and dynamic helical CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of MR angiography in combination with contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and to compare MR imaging including MR angiography with dynamic contrast-enhanced dual phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of vascular invasion in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIAL: MR imaging only, MR imaging including MR angiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced dual phase helical CT images of 48 patients who were operated due to suspicion of pancreas cancer were correlated with the surgery results in terms of vascular invasion. Pathologic diagnosis were pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 31 patients of which nine had surgically confirmed vascular invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (including 95% confidence intervals) and accuracy of MR imaging only, MR imaging including MR angiography and helical CT were calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 56, 100, 100, 85, 87%; 67, 100, 100, 88, 90% and 67, 100, 100, 88, 90%, respectively, for MR imaging only, MR imaging including MR angiography and helical CT in the adenocarcinoma group. The corresponding figures in the overall study group were 56, 97, 83, 90, 90%; 67, 97, 86, 93, 92% and 67, 97, 86, 93, 92%. Confidence intervals (95%) showed that the differences in the diagnostic efficacy of the techniques were not statistically significant in the overall study group, but the confidence intervals were undefined in the adenocarcinoma group due to the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic efficacy of MR imaging when combined with MR angiography is equal to that of dynamic contrast-enhanced dual phase helical CT in the assessment of vascular invasion of pancreatic tumors.     

Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of three pulse sequences commonly used at magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR cholangiography was performed in 57 patients who were suspected of having choledocholithiasis and referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Non-breath-hold three-dimensional fast spin-echo, breath-hold single-section half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE), and breath-hold multisection half-Fourier RARE sequences were compared. Two radiologists independently interpreted the MR cholangiograms. Evaluated diagnostic performance parameters included sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and interobserver agreement (kappa statistics). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was the standard of reference. RESULTS: Eight patients were excluded because of incomplete MR examinations (n = 4) or failure in the cannulation of the bile duct at retrograde cholangiography (n = 4). In 49 patients, the three MR cholangiographic sequences were completed successfully. In 24 (49%) of these patients, retrograde cholangiography demonstrated stones. Sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiography exceeded 90%, and the area under the ROC curve was greater than 0.95 for both radiologists and for the three sequences. Interobserver agreement for presence of bile duct stones was at least 0.80 (very good) for the three sequences. CONCLUSION: The three MR cholangiographic sequences had similarly high sensitivities and specificities for the detection of choledocholithiasis.     

口服法螺旋CT胆管造影临床应用价值探讨

目的探讨口服法螺旋CT胆管造影对胆系疾病的诊断价值和对胆系手术的指导价值。方法可疑胆系病变患者18例。服用碘番酸后12~14h行CT扫描,并行2D、3DMIP重建。据碘番酸剂量分大剂量组(6.0g)5例,中剂量组(3.0g)10例和小剂量组(1.0g)3例。显影程度分未显影、轻度显影、良好显影和过度显影4级。造影结果与病理和/或临床结果对照。结果(1)胆管显影与碘番酸剂量有关。观察肝内胆管用量不应<6.0g,观察肝总管和胆总管3.0g基本满足要求。(2)口服法螺旋CT胆管造影可显示肝内外胆管特别是肝外胆管的解剖结构,反映胆系功能和其通畅情况以及病变与胆管之间的关系,对胆囊阴性结石和胆囊息肉诊断的敏感度为80%,对胆总管阴性结石诊断的敏感度为88.89%,特异度为100%。(3)2D和3DMIP重建空间感好,是原始图像的重要补充。结论口服法螺旋CT胆管造影简便、无创,是显示肝内外胆管解剖结构和诊断胆系病变的一种较好方法,对胆系手术有指导作用。     

Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine whether contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using IV mangafodipir trisodium can accurately detect the presence and location of bile duct leaks in patients who have undergone cholecystectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our study group included 11 patients with suspected bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Axial single-shot fast spin-echo and gradient-echo images were acquired in all patients before and 1-2 hr after IV administration of mangafodipir trisodium. The contrast-enhanced MR cholangiograms were evaluated for image quality, degree of ductal or small bowel opacification, and the presence and location of bile duct leaks, strictures, and stones. MR cholangiograms were correlated with conventional contrast-enhanced cholangiograms obtained in all patients, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n = 10) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 1). RESULTS: Excretion of mangafodipir trisodium was noted in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in all patients from 1 to 2 hr after IV administration. Bile ducts and fluid collections that contained excreted mangafodipir trisodium showed increased signal intensity on gradient-echo sequences and decreased signal intensity on single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Conventional contrast-enhanced cholangiography showed the presence of bile duct leaks in six patients and the absence of bile duct leaks in five patients, with false-negative findings in one patient and false-positive findings in one patient for bile duct leak (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 83%). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium can successfully detect the presence and location of bile duct leaks in patients suspected of having such leaks after undergoing cholecystectomy. More research is necessary before acceptance of this examination as routine in the workup of these patients.     

Helical CT cholangiography for the detection and localization of bile duct leakage.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the use of helical CT cholangiography or helical CT after administration of biliary i.v. contrast material to verify and localize bile duct leakage. CONCLUSION: Helical CT cholangiography revealed bile leaks in seven patients after penetrating trauma or liver or gallbladder surgery and excluded bile leaks in two patients with blunt liver trauma. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed in only one of seven patients with bile leakage and was avoided in an additional two patients in whom CT cholangiography excluded leakage. The method is a feasible, noninvasive tool for the detection and localization of bile leaks and may help avoid endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.     

Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of helical CT cholangiography and that of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of aberrant bile ducts or cystic ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients, including 114 patients with cholecystolithiasis and six with gallbladder polyps, were treated using laparoscopic cholecystectomy between November 1996 and August 1998. Eighteen (15%) of the 120 patients were suspected of having aberrant bile ducts or cystic ducts on helical CT cholangiography, and 16 of these 18 patients were subsequently examined on MR cholangiography. For the 16 patients who underwent both imaging examinations, findings from helical CT cholangiography and MR cholangiography were compared with intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: Aberrant bile ducts in 13 patients and aberrant cystic ducts in three patients were divided into six types on the basis of the results of intraoperative cholangiography. Although these types were clearly identified using helical CT cholangiography in all 16 patients, the anatomic variants were not correctly identified in seven (44%) of the 16 patients with MR cholangiography. False-negative findings were mainly a result of the insertion sites of the cystic ducts or aberrant bile ducts being obscured by aberrant bile ducts or duodenum. Two (2%) of the 120 patients developed mild adverse reactions to the contrast material, but neither required treatment. CONCLUSION: Helical CT cholangiography clearly showed aberrant bile ducts and cystic ducts, but visualization of these structures on MR cholangiography was unsatisfactory because of overlapping duodenum and hepatic ducts.     

MR cholangiography of late biliary complications after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the role of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of late biliary complications after liver transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three liver transplantation patients (18 men and five women; mean age, 46 years) underwent MR cholangiography using a nonbreath-hold, fat-suppressed three-dimensional turbo spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 3000/700; echo train length, 128) optimized on a 0.5-T magnet. Inclusion criteria were liver function tests with abnormal results and hyperbilirubinemia with a clinical pattern not specific for biliary obstruction. All patients were referred by clinicians for contrast-enhanced cholangiography. Diagnostic confirmation was obtained with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 4), endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n = 8), T-tube cholangiography (n = 1), or clinical follow-up (n = 10). RESULTS: In 11 patients, no abnormalities of the biliary tract were revealed by MR cholangiography. In 11 patients, twelve strictures were diagnosed (nine anastomotic, two nonanastomotic-intrahepatic, and one nonanastomotic-extrahepatic, with association between anastomotic and nonanastomotic strictures in two cases). In one other patient, kinking of the common bile duct at the level of the anastomosis was observed. In all cases, MR cholangiography correctly showed the site of the stricture and the dilatation of bile ducts above, with excellent correlation with contrast-enhanced cholangiographic findings. Strictures were correctly graded in eight of 10 patients and were overestimated in two. Other findings included a 1-cm stone detected proximal to the obstructed common bile duct in one patient and multiple intrahepatic stones in another patient. CONCLUSION: MR cholangiography can show biliary obstruction and provide important information for planning therapeutic procedures.     

Multislice CT cholangiography using thin-slab minimum intensity projection and multiplanar reformation in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary obstruction: preliminary experience

Thirty-three patients with suspected biliary obstruction were prospectively evaluated with multislice CT cholangiography using thin-slab minimum intensity projection (MinIP) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) to determine its usefulness and to compare with the comparative studies of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC), or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). CT cholangiography made correct diagnoses in all biliary obstructions except in two patients with common bile duct stones. The correspondence with the comparative study was 93.9%. Multislice CT cholangiography may be favorable in noninvasive evaluation of biliary obstructions.     

Detection of hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, unenhanced MR imaging, and iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT, unenhanced MR imaging, and MR images enhanced with superparamagnetic iron oxide was evaluated in 10 patients with histologically proved hepatic metastases. First, diagnostic performance of the imaging technique with respect to the ability of radiologists to recognize the presence or absence of a metastasis was measured by using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis of single images. Second, the total number of lesions (N = 108) detected by "complete" CT and MR examinations was counted. Finally, lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured in all MR sequences. The area under the ROC curve was .67 +/- .03 for contrast-enhanced CT, .81 +/- .07 for the unenhanced SE 260/14 sequence, and .92 +/- .01 for the iron oxide-enhanced SE 1500/40 sequence. The enhanced SE 1500/40 sequence yielded significantly (p less than .005) greater accuracy than did contrast-enhanced CT. The same sequence detected significantly (p less than .05) more lesions than all other imaging techniques (19% more than the best unenhanced MR sequence and 36% more than contrast-enhanced CT). The enhanced SE 1500/40 sequence also yielded the highest CNR value (19.5 +/- 10.2) of all MR sequences. These results indicate that iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging is a superior imaging technique for the detection of hepatic lesions.     

口服对比剂螺旋CT胆管成像技术的初步临床应用

目的 探讨口服对比剂螺旋CT胆管成像技术(OCHCTC)要点及其临床应用价值。资料与方法26例胆系疾病患者口服碘番酸6g，12h后行上腹部快速容积扫描，获取轴面原始图像后再进行胆管系统的二维和三维重建。对患者的观察结果与临床病理进行对照。结果(1)平均胆管强化cT值与血清胆红素水平呈明显的负相关，血清胆红素水平高于4．0mg/dl者，胆管显影较差或不显影。(2)23例(88．5％)患者胆管显影程度均可进行二维和三维重建，17例显示3级以上胆管。3D图像清晰地显示了胆管解剖结构、梗阻部位或病变形态，弥补了横断面图像的不足，提高了诊断能力。结论 OCHCTC是一种安全可靠、简便易行的胆管系统无创检查技术，3D图像可满意显示胆管解剖结构，有较好的应用前景。     

Preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors: comparison of combined methods of MR imaging with combined methods of CT

OBJECTIVE: We compared radiologists' performance on combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging with their performance on helical CT during arterial portography (CTAP) and biphasic CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MR images and CT scans obtained in 33 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Images of the liver were reviewed on a segment-by-segment basis; a total of 261 segments with 39 hepatocellular carcinomas and 21 metastases were independently reviewed by three radiologists who were invited from outside institutions. Unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images were reviewed first, then ferumoxides-enhanced MR images were added for combined review. CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images were reviewed together. RESULTS: Sensitivity for the detection of hepatic tumors was analogous for combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR images (86%) and for combined CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images (87%). Specificity was higher with MR images (95%, p < 0.01) than with CT images (91%). Radiologists' performances were improved (Az = 0.962, p = 0.0502) by combining ferumoxides-enhanced MR images with unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images (Az = 0.950), and were analogous for combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR images and for combined CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images (Az = 0.959). CONCLUSION: Radiologists' performances on combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging compared with their performances on combined helical CTAP and biphasic CTHA are analogous for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors. Such a dedicated combination of MR imaging may obviate the need for more invasive angiographically assisted helical CT for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors.     

Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Evaluation with MR cholangiography

Purpose:
To assess the diagnostic value of MR cholangiography (MRC) for detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones in candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Material and Methods:
A series of 95 selected patients with gallstones and suspected CBD lithiasis (abnormal serum liver tests and/or CBD size ≥6.5 mm at US) were referred to our institution for MRC, before LC. MRC was performed on a 0.5 T magnet through a non-breath-hold, respiratory-triggered, fat-suppressed, thin-slab, heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence and through a breath-hold, thick-slab, single-shot T2-weighted sequence in the coronal plane. Axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences were first obtained. Two observers in conference reviewed source images and maximum intensity projections to determine the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis. MR findings were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC); IOC was always performed during LC. Results:
CBD calculi (single or multiple) were identified in 41 out of 95 patients (43%). Two false-positive and 4 false-negative cases were found on MRC. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRC for choledocholithiasis were 90%, 96%, 94%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. Conclusion:
MRC is a highly effective diagnostic modality for evaluation of patients with risk factors for CBD stones prior to LC.     

Biliary obstruction: findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging.

Twenty-two patients with malignant biliary obstruction and 21 patients with suspected obstruction of biliary-enteric anastomoses were evaluated over a 12-month period with magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging. In patients with malignant obstruction, MR cholangiography helped accurately determine the status of the biliary ductal system by identifying the exact location and extent of the obstruction and the severity of duct dilatation. In so doing, MR cholangiography helped determine whether percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with antegrade stent placement or retrograde cholangiography with stent placement constituted the more suitable treatment. Cross-sectional MR imaging was necessary to identify the organ of tumor origin, define the tumor margins, and determine the stage of disease. This information helped evaluate the appropriateness of curative surgical therapy versus palliative drainage procedures. In patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses, MR cholangiography clearly depicted the site of the anastomosis and demonstrated the status of the intrahepatic ducts, thereby helping determine which patients would benefit from undergoing antegrade duct cannulation with a drainage procedure or perhaps balloon dilation. In some of these patients, MR cholangiography was sufficient to help plan therapeutic intervention. MR cholangiography also demonstrates the presence and size of biliary stones and associated findings such as intraductal tumor growth. In addition, MR cholangiography may obviate retrograde cholangiography, which can be technically difficult to perform.     

Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of intravenous contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with that of intravenous and rectal contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of children suspected of having appendicitis by using pathologic findings, surgical findings, or a follow-up telephone call as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the committee on clinical investigations. As part of a larger study, informed consent was obtained from all parents and from all children older than 7 years. Consecutive patients aged 5-21 years who presented to the emergency department and were suspected of having appendicitis were studied with CT. From April 2003 until February 2004, patients underwent intravenous and rectal contrast-enhanced CT. From March 2004 until December 2004, patients underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and test performance characteristics--including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values--were compared. RESULTS: Of the 416 patients who met inclusion criteria, 223 underwent intravenous and rectal contrast-enhanced CT and 193 underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. There were no differences in sex distribution (55% vs 52% male patients), frequency of appendicitis (36% vs 32%), or frequency of equivocal CT findings (4%) between the groups. Intravenous and rectal contrast-enhanced CT had a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85%, 97%), a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 79%, 92%), a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI: 90%, 98%), and an accuracy of 89% (95% CI: 85%, 93%). Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT had a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 84%, 97%), a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 85%, 96%), a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), and an accuracy of 92% (95% CI: 88%, 96%) (P > .2 for all comparisons). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the performance of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT and that of rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in children suspected of having appendicitis.     

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography

In patients with biliary obstruction, determining the level and the cause of the obstruction is essential because it can be a key factor for the next step in diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. Noninvasive cholangiography, such as computed tomography (CT) cholangiography or magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography, allows the diagnosis of cause and level of biliary disease with minimal risk. Traditional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an established and effective noninvasive diagnostic modality particularly for extrahepatic biliary tract evaluation. Intrahepatic biliary duct evaluation and functional MR, including evaluating for leaks and gallbladder dyskinesia and outlet obstruction, are evolving diagnostic techniques that show promising results. CT cholangiography techniques are especially useful when MRI is not available or contraindicated or when the quality of MRCP images is suboptimal. CT cholangiography is particularly useful as an adjunct to surgery or postsurgical cases. The primary limitation of cholangiographic contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography (the most prevalent type of CT cholangiography) is its hindrance by poor liver function and/or high-grade biliary obstruction. In this setting MRCP is clearly superior. There are different types of CT cholangiography and MRCP. This article discusses the types of CT cholangiography and MRCP techniques and their clinical applications.     

Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of unenhanced helical CT with combined sonography and unenhanced radiography in patients with acute flank pain suggestive of ureteral colic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to December 1999, 181 consecutive patients with acute flank pain underwent unenhanced radiography, sonography, and unenhanced helical CT (protocol A). From January 2000 to December 2000, 96 consecutive patients arriving at the emergency department with acute flank pain were alternately submitted either to primary unenhanced helical CT (protocol B, 48 patients) or to unenhanced radiography and sonography with the addition of helical CT in unclear cases (protocol C, 48 patients). RESULTS: When compared with the diagnostic accuracy for ureterolithiasis of the combined sonography and radiography in the same group of subjects (protocol A), CT had a greater sensitivity (92% vs 77%), negative predictive value (87% vs 68%), and overall accuracy (94% vs 83%). Among patients who underwent primary CT (protocol B), we found three false-negatives (all with spontaneous stone passage) and no false-positives. Among patients initially examined with unenhanced radiography and sonography (protocol C), we found one false-positive (leading to patient admission and needless repeated radiographic and sonographic studies) and six false-negatives (all followed by an uncomplicated course and spontaneous passage); CT depicted four of these stones but did not result in change in treatment. Fourteen percent of the patients in protocol C required invasive treatment, but combined sonography and radiography showed stones and hydronephrosis in all these patients. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced CT was the most accurate modality for determining the presence of ureterolithiasis. The combination of abdominal radiography and sonography, however, yielded comparable results with no clinically important misdiagnoses and thus can be used as an alternative when CT resources are limited.     

Mr cholangiography with volume rendering: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in patients with choledocholithiasis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare observer performances for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis using MR cholangiography with volume-rendered, maximum-intensity-projection, and thick-section half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The images from three types of MR cholangiography performed on 43 patients with biliary calculi were retrospectively analyzed. Image review was conducted for two anatomic compartments (upper biliary tract and common bile duct). A total of 86 compartments, including 19 with bile duct calculi, were reviewed by three independent off-site gastrointestinal radiologists. Observer performance was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Image quality was subjectively judged by three radiologists. RESULTS: Sensitivity was higher with volume-rendered MR cholangiography (58%) than with thick-section (54%, not significant) and maximum-intensity-projection MR cholangiography (47%, p < 0.07). Specificity was higher with volume-rendered MR cholangiography (92%) than with thick-section (86%, p < 0.03) and maximum-intensity-projection MR cholangiography (88%, not significant). Accuracy was higher with volume-rendered MR cholangiography (84%) than with thick-section and maximum-intensity-projection MR cholangiography (79% for both, not significant). Observer performance with volume-rendered MR cholangiography (A(z) = 0.791--0.952) was better than that with thick-section (A(z) = 0.722--0.834) and maximum-intensity-projection MR cholangiography (A(z) = 0.771--0.887). Image quality was better with maximum-intensity-projection MR cholangiography and thick-section MR cholangiography than with volume-rendered MR cholangiography (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Observer performance with volume-rendered MR cholangiography was better than that with maximum-intensity-projection and thick-section MR cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Volume rendering may be an efficient technique for the reconstruction of MR cholangiography.     

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging for the detection of urinary stone disease using dual-source CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (mean age 46.6 +/- 16.2 years, range 27-85 years) suspected of having urinary stone disease underwent dual-source CT of the urinary tract. A 3-phasic CT scan protocol consisting of a standard unenhanced scan, a nephrographic, and an excretory phase of contrast enhancement was performed. The nephrographic phase scan was acquired in the dual-energy mode (80 kV/400 mA and 140 kV/95 mA) allowing reconstruction of virtual unenhanced images. Two blinded readers independently compared standard and virtual unenhanced CT for the number, size, and location of urinary stones. Measurements of anteroposterior abdominal diameters were performed to determine abdominal obesity. RESULTS: Standard unenhanced CT revealed 35 uroliths in 18 of the 40 patients (18 of 40; 45%), virtual unenhanced CT demonstrated 26 uroliths in 15 of the 40 patients (15 of 40; 38%) ([kappa] value 0.89). Three false-negative and no false-positive ratings occurred using virtual unenhanced CT, and false-negative ratings solely occurred in obese patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values for virtual unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of urinary stone disease were 83%, 100%, 100%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual unenhanced CT images reconstructed from contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT allow detection of urinary stones with good sensitivity and excellent specificity, but sensitivity is decreased in abdominal obese patients.