A phase I study of ixabepilone in combination with epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PurposeThe objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and the recommended phase II dose for ixabepilone in combination with epirubicin in women with metastatic breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients ≥18 years old with an histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and clinical evidence of locally recurrent or metastatic disease were enrolled and treated with a fixed dose of epirubicin (75 mg/m²) and escalating doses of ixabepilone (25, 30, and 35 mg/m²).ResultsForty-two women were treated at 3 different dose levels of ixabepilone: 25 (n = 6), 30 (n = 30), and 35 mg/m² (n = 6) in combination with 75 mg/m² epirubicin. The MTD of ixabepilone in combination with epirubicin 75 mg/m² was 30 mg/m², and the DLT dose was 35 mg/m² with grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the most frequent moderate-to-severe adverse event and was manageable and reversible. No deaths were reported. Objective responses were achieved in 18 of 32 patients with measurable disease (56% [90% CI, 40%-71%]) and in 9 of 22 evaluable patients treated at the MTD (41% [90% CI, 23%-61%]). Ixabepilone clearance and the epirubicin pharmacokinetic profile were similar across ixabepilone dose levels.ConclusionsThe combination of ixabepilone and epirubicin was clinically active. The recommended dose for evaluation in phase II is epirubicin 75 mg/m², followed by ixabepilone 30 mg/m² every 3 weeks.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of 3-weekly, 3-h infusion of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, in Japanese patients with refractory solid tumors

Background Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) is the first in a new class of anti-neoplastic agents, the epothilone analogs, and is a highly active non-taxane anti-microtubule agent. This phase I study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of ixabepilone in Japanese patients. Patients and methods Patients with solid tumors previously treated with up to four chemotherapy regimens received a 3-h intravenous infusion of ixabepilone every 3 weeks. Results Fourteen patients received 43 cycles (median 3, range 1–8). The most common adverse events were neutropenia, mild-to-moderate fatigue, anemia, and peripheral neuropathy. DLTs occurred in one patient receiving 40 mg/m² (grade 4 neutropenia for 9 days) and in two patients receiving 50 mg/m² (grade 3 mucositis, ileus and febrile neutropenia; grade 4 neutropenia for 10 days). One paclitaxel- and docetaxel-pretreated patient with non-small cell lung cancer achieved a partial response lasting for 3 months; six additional patients (43%) achieved disease stabilization with tumor shrinkage of 3–35%. The plasma concentration–time profiles of ixabepilone during cycle 1 were similar across all doses evaluated. Conclusions The MTD of ixabepilone is 50 mg/m² given over 3 h every 3 weeks. The recommended phase II dose is 40 mg/m², which is well tolerated and active. Data from Japanese patients are consistent with published phase I data from non-Japanese patients.     

Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Carcinomas: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Phase I and II Trial, N9943

Purpose

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with either biliary tract or gallbladder carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients with unresectable previously untreated biliary tract cancers were eligible for participation. An initial phase I trial was performed to determine the MTD using an every-2-weeks schedule. The MTD was then used in the phase II portion of the trial. The primary end point for the phase II portion was 6-month survival with a planned accrual of 59 patients.

Results

Overall, 63 eligible patients were enrolled. The MTD was established as pemetrexed 500 mg/m² IV over 10 min and gemcitabine 800 mg/m² IV at 10 mg/m² per minute on days 1 and 15 of an every-4-weeks schedule with vitamin B12 and folate supplementation. Fifty-eight patients were included in the phase II portion. Median age was 61 and median follow-up was 18.2 months. A median of three cycles of treatment was given. Six-month survival was 55% and the median survival was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval 5.4–8.7 months) with a median time to progression of 3.8 months (2.4–5.4). Forty-seven (81%) experienced at least one grade 3+ adverse event, and 28 patients (48%) experienced at least one grade 4 adverse event, most of which were due to grade 4 neutropenia.

Conclusion

The addition of pemetrexed to fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine, in a biweekly schedule, did not enhance the activity of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or gallbladder carcinoma.     

A phase I/II trial of vandetanib for patients with recurrent malignant glioma

Vandetanib is a once-daily multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and the rearranged-during-transfection oncogene. A phase I trial was conducted to describe the pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in patients with recurrent glioma on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this population. A phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of vandetanib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma not on EIAEDs as measured by 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). In the phase I trial, 15 patients were treated with vandetanib at doses of 300, 400, and 500 mg/day, in a standard dose-escalation design. The MTD in patients on EIAEDs was 400 mg/day, and steady-state levels were similar to those measured in patients not on EIAEDs. Dose-limiting toxicities were prolonged QTc and thromboembolism. Thirty-two patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 32 patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas (AGs) were treated in the phase II trial, at a dosage of 300 mg/day on 28-day cycles. Six patients (4 GBM, 2 AG) had radiographic response. PFS6 was 6.5% in the GBM arm and 7.0% in the AG arm. Median overall survival was 6.3 months in the GBM arm and 7.6 months in the AG arm. Seizures were an unexpected toxicity of therapy. Vandetanib did not have significant activity in unselected patients with recurrent malignant glioma.     

Phase I trial of ixabepilone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with adenocarcinoma of breast or ovary

Background: Ixabepilone is a semisynthetic epothilone B analogue that is active in taxane-resistant cell lines and has shown activity in patients with refractory breast and ovarian cancer. We carried out a phase I trial of ixabepilone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced taxane-pretreated ovarian and breast cancer.Methods: Patients with recurrent ovarian or breast carcinoma received PLD every 3 or 4 weeks plus five different dose schemas of ixabepilone in cohorts of three to six patients.Results: Thirty patients received a total of 142 treatment cycles of the PLD–ixabepilone combination. The recommended phase II dose and schedule of ixabepilone was 16 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 plus PLD 30 mg/m² given on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. Hand–foot syndrome and mucositis were dose limiting when both ixabepilone and PLD were given every 3 or 4 weeks. Objective responses were observed in 3 of 13 patients (23%) with breast cancer and 5 of 17 patients (29%) with ovarian cancer.Conclusion: Ixabepilone may be safely combined with PLD, but tolerability is highly dependent upon the scheduling of both agents. This combination demonstrated efficacy in patients with breast and ovarian cancer and merits further evaluation in these settings.     

Phase I trial of dose-escalating metronomic temozolomide plus bevacizumab and bortezomib for patients with recurrent glioblastoma

The average survival time for patients with recurrent glioblastoma is between 5 and 9 months. Phase I and II trials have shown a modest survival benefit with combination temozolomide and other chemotherapeutics. We conducted a phase I trial of dose-escalating temozolomide with bevacizumab and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for patients with recurrent disease. Three groups of three patients were scheduled to receive daily doses of temozolomide at 25, 50, and 75 mg/m². Fixed doses of bortezomib and bevacizumab were given at standard intervals. Patients were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide with this regimen. No DLT were seen in the first two groups (25 and 50 mg/m² temozolomide). One patient in the 75 mg/m² group experienced a grade 4 elevation of ALT and three more patients were accrued for a total of six patients at that dose level. No other DLT occurred, thus making 75 mg/m² the MTD. Progression-free survival was 3.27 months for all patients and mean overall survival was 20.75 months. The MTD of temozolomide was 75 mg/m² in combination with bevacizumab and bortezomib for recurrent glioblastoma. Only one patient experienced a severe (Grade 4) elevation of ALT. This study will provide the framework for further studies to elicit effectiveness and better determine a safety profile for this drug combination.     

A phase I/II trial of GW572016 (lapatinib) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and molecular correlation

Purpose

We undertook a phase I/II study of the EGFR/erbB2 inhibitor lapatinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to determine response rate, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended dose in patients taking enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and to explore relationships of molecular genetics to outcome.

Methods

Recurrent GBM patients taking EIAEDs were enrolled on the phase I portion (starting dose of lapatinib 1,000 mg po bid). In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), escalation continued in cohorts of three patients. Patients not on EIAEDs enrolled in the phase II arm (lapatinib 750 mg bid po). Immunohistochemical and quantitative RT PCR studies were performed on tumor to determine PTEN and EGFRvIII status, respectively. Lapatinib PK was analyzed using HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Phase II: Of 17 patients, 4 had stable disease and 13 progressed. Accrual ceased because of no responses. Phase I: Four patients received 1,000 mg bid and three, 1,500 mg bid. No DLT occurred, but escalation stopped because of lack of phase II efficacy. Lapatinib apparent oral clearance in patients taking EIAEDs was 106.9 L h^?1 m^?2 in comparison to 12.1 L h^?1 m^?2 in those not on EIAEDs. In 16 phase II patients, PTEN loss was seen in 6 and EGFRvIII expression in 4. No correlation was seen with outcome and molecular results.

Conclusions

Lapatinib apparent oral clearance increased by approximately tenfold when given with EIAEDs. In this small sample, EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss did not predict a favorable subtype. Overall, lapatinib did not show significant activity in GBM patients.     

Phase IB trial of ixabepilone and vorinostat in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

To translate promising preclinical data on the combination of vorinostat and ixabepilone for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) into clinical trials.

Methods

We conducted a randomized two-arm Phase IB clinical trial of ascending doses of vorinostat and ixabepilone in prior -treated MBC patients. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), 37 patients were randomized to schedule A: every-3-week ixabepilone + vorinostat (days 1–14), or schedule B: weekly ixabepilone + vorinostat (days 1–7; 15–21) Pharmacokinetics were assessed. Nineteen additional patients were randomized to schedule A or B and objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

Results

The schedule A MTD was vorinostat 300 mg daily (days 1–14), ixabepilone 32 mg/m² (day 2); 21-day cycle 27% dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The schedule B MTD was vorinostat 300 mg daily (days 1–7; 15–21), ixabepilone 16 mg/m² (days 2, 9, 16); 28-day cycle; no DLTs. Vorinostat and ixabepilone clearances were 194 L/h and 21.3 L/h/m², respectively. Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported in 8% (A) and 21% (B) of patients. The ORR and CBR were 22 and 22% (A); 30 and 35% (B). Median PFS was 3.9 (A) and 3.7 (B) months. OS was 14.8 (A) and 17.1 (B) months.

Conclusions

We established the MTD of vorinostat and ixabepilone. This drug combination offers a novel therapy for previously treated MBC patients. The potential for lower toxicity and comparable efficacy compared to current therapies warrants further study.

     

Phase I dose escalation study of weekly ixabepilone, an epothilone analog, in patients with advanced solid tumors who have failed standard therapy

Purpose  To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety and recommended Phase II dose of ixabepilone, administered weekly as an intravenous (IV) infusion to patients with solid tumors who have failed standard therapy. Method  This was an open-label, single-arm, Phase I, dose-escalation study. Results  The MTD of ixabepilone [30-min, weekly IV infusion on a 21-day schedule (N = 33)] was established at 25 mg/m². Grade 3 fatigue was the DLT in 2/4 patients treated at 30 mg/m². Ixabepilone was well tolerated at the MTD. Myelosuppression was rare, with no Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Due to the potential for cumulative neurotoxicity, the protocol was amended to a 1-h infusion, weekly for 3 weeks with a 1-week break. No DLT occurred at starting doses of 15, 20 and 25 mg/m² on this modified schedule (N = 51), although overall toxicity was less at 15 and 20 mg/m² than 25 mg/m². Five patients (2 on the 30-min/21-day schedule and 3 on the 60-min/28-day schedule) achieved durable objective partial responses across a variety of tumor types. Conclusions  Ixabepilone had an acceptable safety profile at the MTD of 25 mg/m² (as a 30-min weekly infusion on a continuous 21-day schedule) and at 20 mg/m² (as a 1-h weekly infusion on a modified 28-day schedule). The clinical activity and acceptable tolerability profile warrant further single- or combination-agent evaluation.     

Transcranial electro-hyperthermia combined with alkylating chemotherapy in patients with relapsed high-grade gliomas: phase I clinical results

Non-invasive loco-regional electro-hyperthermia (EHT) plus alkylating chemotherapy is occasionally used as salvage treatment in the relapse of patients with high-grade gliomas. Experimental data and retrospective studies suggest potential effects. However, no prospective clinical results are available. We performed a single-center prospective non-controlled single-arm Phase I trial. Main inclusion criteria were recurrent high-grade glioma WHO Grade III or IV, age 18–70, and Karnofsky performance score ≥70. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with the combined regimen. Groups of 3 or 4 patients were treated 2–5 times a week in a dose-escalation scheme with EHT. Alkylating chemotherapy (ACNU, nimustin) was administered at a dose of 90 mg/m² on day 1 of 42 days for up to six cycles or until tumor progression (PD) or DLT occurred. Fifteen patients with high-grade gliomas were included. Relevant toxicities were local pain and increased focal neurological signs or intracranial pressure. No DLT occurred. In some patients, the administration of mannitol during EHT or long-term use of corticosteroids was necessary to resolve symptoms. Although some patients showed responses in their primarily treated sites, the pattern of response was not well defined. EHT plus alkylating chemotherapy is tolerable in patients with relapse of high-grade gliomas. Episodes of intracranial pressure were, at least, possibly attributed to EHT but did not cause DLTs. A Phase II trial targeting treatment effects is warranted on the basis of the results raised in this trial.     

Phase I/II study of intraperitoneal docetaxel plus S-1 for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Purpose

We designed a phase I/II trial of intraperitoneal (IP) docetaxel plus S-1 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) and to evaluate its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

Methods

Patients with PC confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy received IP docetaxel on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (80 mg/m²) on days 1–14 every 4 weeks.

Results

In the phase I part (n = 12), each cohort received escalating doses of docetaxel (35–50 mg/m²); the MTD was determined to be 50 mg/m² and the RD was determined to be 45 mg/m². Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. In the phase II part (n = 27), the median number of courses was 4 (range 2–11). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70 % (95 % confidence interval 53–87 %). The overall response rate was 22 % and peritoneal cytology turned negative in 18 of 22 (81 %) patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included anorexia (19 %), neutropenia (7 %), and leukopenia (7 %).

Conclusion

IP docetaxel plus S-1 is active and safety in gastric cancer patients with PC.     

Phase I/II study of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in anthracycline-pretreated/resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of the epothilone B analogue ixabepilone plus capecitabine in anthracycline-pretreated/ resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled. The study consisted of a dose-escalation phase (phase I) and a tumor response rate evaluation phase (phase II). Seventy-four patients were treated in phase I with schedule A (ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 plus capecitabine 1650-2000 mg/m2 on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) or schedule B (ixabepilone 8-10 mg/m2 on days 1-3 plus capecitabine 1650 mg/m2 on days 1-14 of a 21- day cycle). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in the 8/1650 mg/m2 and 10/1650 mg/m2 cohorts; 1 of 30 patients in the 40/1650 mg/m2 cohort and 2 of 30 patients in the 40/2000 mg/m2 cohort had a DLT consisting of grade 3 plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). The 40/2000 mg/m2 dose was defined as the MTD for schedule A, and a total of 62 patients were treated for the phase II portion of the trial, which examined tumor response. The objective response rate was 30%, median time-to-response was 6 weeks, median duration of response was 6.9 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.8 months. Grade 3/4 treatment-related events in phase II included fatigue (34%), PPE (34%), myalgia (23%), nausea (16%), peripheral neuropathy (19%), and diarrhea/vomiting (10%). Grades 3/4 neutropenia (69%) and leukopenia (55%) were managed primarily by dose reduction/treatment interruption. CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with anthracycline-pretreated/resistant and taxane-resistant MBC. Ixabepilone was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of resistant/refractory locally advanced or MBC.     

A randomized, phase II, three-arm study of two schedules of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer

The aim of this phase II trial was to estimate the objective response rate (ORR) of two different schedules of ixabepilone [weekly or every 3 weeks (Q3W)] combined with bevacizumab, relative to a reference arm of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were randomized 3:3:2 to ixabepilone 16 mg/m² weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W (Arm A: n = 46); ixabepilone 40 mg/m² Q3W (reduced to 32 mg/m² after four cycles of treatment) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Q3W (Arm B: n = 45); or paclitaxel 90 mg/m² weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion Q2W (Arm C: n = 32). Of 123 randomized patients, 122 were treated. All were followed for ≥19 months; 5 % of patients remained on study treatment at the time of this analysis. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common in Arm B (60 %) than Arms A (16 %) or C (22 %); other adverse events were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR was 48, 71, and 63 % for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival (randomized patients) was 9.6 months in Arm A, 11.9 months in Arm B, and 13.5 months in Arm C. In conclusion, ixabepilone Q3W plus bevacizumab has clinical activity as first-line therapy for MBC relative to paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, but with significantly greater risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. In addition, these data suggest that weekly dosing of ixabepilone may be less active than Q3W dosing, but with less neutropenia.     

Phase I study of temozolomide combined with oral etoposide in children with malignant glial tumors

The treatment of children with malignant glioma remains challenging. The aim of this multicenter phase I study is to establish the recommended dose (RD) of the combination therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and oral etoposide (VP-16) in children with relapsed or refractory malignant glioma and brainstem glioma at diagnosis. A phase I trial was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TMZ and oral VP-16. This orally administered combination was investigated by a classical 3 + 3 design. Cohorts of patients were enrolled at 4 different levels: (1) TMZ 120 mg/m² on days 1–5 and VP-16 50 mg/m² on days 1–8; (2) TMZ 150 mg/m² on days 1–5 and VP-16 50 mg/m² on days 1–8; (3) TMZ 150 mg/m² on days 1–5 and VP-16 50 mg/m² on days 1–10; (4) TMZ 150 mg/m² on days 1–5 and VP-16 50 mg/m² on days 1–12. Therapy was administered in 28-day courses. A total of 118 courses were administered to 18 patients with a median age of 11.2 years. At dose level 1, none displayed toxicity. Of the 6 patients at dose level 2, 1 patient had dose limiting toxicity (DLT). None of the 3 patients at dose level 3 had DLT. At dose level 4, grade III/IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed in 2 out of the 6 patients enrolled. Therefore, the MTD was established at dose level 3. The RD for phase II trial in children with malignant glial is TMZ 150 mg/m² for 5 days and VP-16 50 mg/m² for 10 days every 28 days.     

A phase I study of oral ixabepilone in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background

Intravenous infusion of ixabepilone is Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a novel oral formulation of ixabepilone in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Forty-four patients received one of six daily doses of oral ixabepilone (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 mg) on days 1–5 of a 21-day cycle. PK parameters were evaluated in cycle 1 for all treated patients and in cycle 1 and cycle 2 for patients participating in assessments of food and gastric pH effects.

Results

The most common DLTs (reported in at least one patient) were neutropenia, neutropenic fever, diarrhea, ileus, and hypokalemia. The MTD of oral ixabepilone was 25 mg. Plasma concentrations of ixabepilone showed high variability; coefficients of variation for the area under the curve and the peak plasma concentration ranged from 61 to 131 % and from 17 to 172 %, respectively. The mean half-life of ixabepilone calculated after day 5 of cycle 1 ranged from 24 to 47 h. Ixabepilone exposure was higher when administered with a low-fat meal compared with the fasted state, and when administered 2 h after the histamine H2 receptor antagonist famotidine.

Conclusions

The MTD of oral ixabepilone when administered once daily for five consecutive days every 21 days was 25 mg. Ixabepilone exposure was highly variable; therefore, safety and efficacy of this novel oral formulation might not be reliably predicted.     

Prognostic relevance of mutations and copy number alterations assessed with targeted next generation sequencing in IDH mutant grade II glioma

Prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) ranging from 9 to 48% depending on the treatment regimen and use of anti-angiogenic therapies. We sought to study vorinostat (VOR), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) and daily metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in a Phase I/II trial in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). This was a Phase I/II open-label, single-arm study in recurrent HGG patients. Phase I primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VOR with BEV and daily TMZ. Phase II primary endpoint was PFS6. Regimen was BEV 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, TMZ 50 mg/m² po daily, and VOR 200 or 400 mg po alternating 7 days on then 7 days off throughout a 28-day cycle. Phase I portion enrolled nine subjects with three receiving VOR 200 mg and 6 receiving VOR 400 mg. With no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 200 mg and one DLT (thrombocytopenia, Grade 3) at 400 mg, the MTD was 400 mg. Phase II portion enrolled 39 GBM subjects, and PFS6 was 53.8% (95% CI 37.2–67.9%). Of note, 14 subjects had received prior BEV and all had received prior 5-day TMZ. Combination therapy with VOR, BEV, and daily TMZ was well tolerated and safe. While PFS6 was not statistically improved beyond historical controls, it is important to note that this was a heavily pretreated GBM population and further consideration is warranted in a less pretreated group.     

Phase I study of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation (WBR) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors. Four doses of intravenous weekly bendamustine were administered with 3 weeks of WBR at three dose levels (60, 80, and 100 mg/m²) according to a standard 3 + 3 phase I design. A total of 12 patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled in the study (six with non-small cell lung cancer, four with melanoma, one with breast cancer, and one with neuroendocrine carcinoma). The first two dose levels had three patients each, and the third dose level had six total patients. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies of bendamustine demonstrated no significant differences from pharmacokinetic characteristics of bendamustine in other studies. No DLTs were noted at any dose levels, and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. The MTD of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was 100 mg/m². The majority of trial patients died from progressive systemic disease rather than their brain disease. The combination of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was acceptably tolerated. The efficacy of this combination may be evaluated in a phase II trial with stratification by histologies.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in taxane-resistant patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines: results of a phase II study in Japan

Purpose

Anthracycline and taxane resistance is a key issue in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), particularly in Asian patients who often present with advanced disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone monotherapy in Japanese patients with taxane-resistant MBC previously treated with anthracycline.

Patients and methods

Japanese patients with taxane-resistant MBC previously treated with anthracycline were treated with 40 mg/m² ixabepilone every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, time to progression (TTP), and safety.

Results

Fifty-two patients were treated with ixabepilone. Overall response rate was 11.5 % (95 % confidence interval 4.4–23.4), stable disease rate was 38.5 %, duration of response was 3.6 months (range 2.4?5.3 months), and TTP was 2.8 months (range 0.7–8.1 months). The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (82.7 %), leukopenia (75 %), myalgia (19.2 %), and peripheral neuropathy (19.2 %).

Conclusion

Ixabepilone monotherapy was effective and toxicities were manageable in this phase II study of Japanese patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines.     

Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment

Purpose

Effective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with or resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed as a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in both anthracycline-pretreated and resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer of Chinese women.

Patients and methods

Patients with measurable disease who had anthracycline and taxanes as prior neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic therapy were treated with ixabepilone at 40 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m² orally on day 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the objective response rate. The secondary end points were time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity profiles.

Results

Twenty-one patients received 146 cycles with a median of 5 cycles (range 1–13 cycles) per patients. Fourteen patients (66.7%) had partial response, 5 patients (23.8%) had stable disease, and 2 patients (9.5%) had progressive disease. Median time to progression and duration of response were 6.2 and 6.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 16.7 months. Eight (38.1%) patients required dose reduction and 14 (66.7%) patients discontinued treatment for adverse effect. Grade 3/4 treatment-related events included fatigue (28.6%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (33.3%), neutropenia (61.9%), anemia (4.7%), hypokalemia (4.7%), hand and foot syndrome (19.0%) and infection (9.5%). Resolution of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy was reversible after a median period of 6 weeks.

Conclusion

Ixabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrated a clear activity and an acceptable safety profile in Chinese patients with anthracycline-pretreated/resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer, and the majority of patients completed 6 cycles of the therapy with manageable neuropathy toxicities.     

A Prospective Phase I/II Study of Docetaxel,Cisplatin and Continuous Capecitabine in Advanced Oesophago-Gastric Cancer (NWCOG-3)

Aims

This open-label prospective phase I/II dose-escalation study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and then evaluated response, safety and feasibility of a novel combination of docetaxel, cisplatinum and capecitabine (DCC) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced oesophago-gastric carcinoma.