Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a large sample of Dutch nursing home patients with dementia

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia patients in Dutch nursing homes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in a large sample of 1322 demented patients living in 59 dementia special care units (SCUs) in The Netherlands. Symptoms were observed by licensed vocational nurses during regular care-giving in a 2-week observational period prior to assessment. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory- Nursing home version (NPI-NH; frequency X severity score >/= 4) and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI; symptoms occurring at least once a week). RESULTS: More than 80% of these patients suffered from at least one clinically significant symptom, as defined with the NPI-NH frequency X severity score >/= 4. Measured with the NPH-NH agitation/aggression, apathy and irritability were the most frequently observed behaviors, with prevalences of 30-35%. Using the CMAI, 85% of the patients showed at least one symptom of agitation, of which general restlessness was observed most frequently (44%). Other frequently observed symptoms with prevalence rates of 30% were cursing or verbal aggression, constant request for attention, negativism, repetitious sentences, mannerisms, pacing, and complaining. Physically aggressive symptoms such as hitting, kicking, biting occurred less often (less than 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence rates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Dutch nursing home patients with dementia residing in SCUs are high, especially agitation and apathy. Insight into the prevalence rates of individual symptoms in patients with dementia has important practical consequences for the accurate planning of staff allotment and stresses the need for patient oriented care.     

Differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms between nursing home residents with young-onset dementia and late-onset dementia

Objective: The aims of the current study are (1) to explore the differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) between young-onset dementia (YOD) and late-onset dementia (LOD), and (2) to investigate whether the possible differences can be attributed to differences in dementia subtype, gender, psychotropic drug use (PDU), or dementia severity.

Method: Three hundred and eighty-six nursing home (NH) residents with YOD and 350 with LOD were included. Multilevel modeling was used to compare NPS between the groups . Furthermore, dementia subtype, gender, PDU, and dementia severity were added to the crude multilevel models to investigate whether the possible differences in NPS could be attributed to these characteristics.

Results: Higher levels of apathy were found in NH residents with YOD. After the characteristics were added to the models, also lower levels of verbally agitated behaviors were found in YOD .

Conclusion: We recommend that special attention be paid to interventions targeting apathy in YOD. Although no differences in other NPS were found, the PDU rates were higher in YOD, suggesting that the threshold for the use of PDU in the management of NPS is lower. This underscores the need for appropriate attention to non-pharmacological interventions for the management of NPS in YOD.     

Neuropsychiatric inventory workshop: behavioral and psychologic symptoms of dementia in Asia

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was introduced in 1994 and has since become a standard instrument for clinical trials and other types of behavioral research in dementing disorders. Its reliability and validity have been confirmed. The NPI was the subject of a workshop in Asia in conjunction with the International Workgroup on Dementia Drug Guidelines (IWG). Investigators using the NPI from 4 Asian areas--Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand--presented conclusions from their research. A high prevalence of behavioral disturbances across Asian countries was found and the rates are similar to those observed in Western countries. Apathy is more difficult to detect and characterize in Asian populations. Neurobiologic studies show an excess of some serotonin receptor gene polymorphisms in patients without behavioral disturbances and positron emission tomography reveals reductions in frontal lobe metabolism in patients manifesting depression as measured by the NPI. Studies in Thailand show relationships among verbal fluency, activities of daily living, and neuropsychiatric symptoms particularly agitation, apathy, and disinhibition. This suggests a triad of symptoms of behavioral abnormalities, executive dysfunction, and abnormalities of activities of daily living that impugn frontal lobe function. The NPI is a reliable and useful instrument to characterize behavioral changes in Asian and Western populations.     

Behavioral problems in dementia: a factor analysis of the neuropsychiatric inventory

The aim of this study was to detect behavioral subsyndromes of the 12-item Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Cross-sectional data of 199 patients with dementia living in the community were collected. Principal component analysis (with Varimax rotation) was used for factor analysis. Results showed the presence of three behavioral subsyndromes: mood/apathy, psychosis, and hyperactivity. Anxiety was regarded as a separate symptom. The subsyndrome mood/apathy was the most common, occurring in almost 80% of the patients, versus psychosis and hyperactivity, which occurred in 37 and 60% of the patients, respectively.     

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home version in an elderly neuropsychiatric population

BACKGROUND: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is an interview-based instrument designed to elicit information from an informal caregiver to evaluate behavioral disturbances in persons with dementia. Minor modifications of this instrument have produced the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH), a version specifically designed for interviewing professional care facility staff. The purpose of this investigation is to further understand the psychometric properties of the NPI-NH by examining its reliability, validity, and factor structure in an elderly neuropsychiatric population. METHOD: Participants were 204 elderly inpatients from a large provincial neuropsychiatric hospital in British Columbia, Canada. Data were collected as part of a patient needs assessment project. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of the NPI-NH was alpha=0.67. An exploratory principal axis analysis with varimax rotation revealed five factors that accounted for 63.2% of the variance. These factors reflect aspects of psychiatric disturbance associated with: (a) Agitation; (b) Mood; (c) Psychosis; (d) Sleep/Motor Activity; and (e) Elevated Behavior. Convergent and discriminant validity of the five factors by correlating them with other behavioral measures was considered satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide support for the clinical use of the NPI-NH as a screen for neuropsychiatric symptoms in an elderly neuropsychiatric population. However, additional research is encouraged to further evaluate the clinical utility of the NPI-NH in nursing home and inpatient geriatric settings.     

Prevalence and predictors of neuropsychiatric symptoms in cognitively impaired nursing home patients

The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and the influence of predictive factors in cognitively impaired nursing home patients were reviewed. Articles were identified by means of a MEDLINE and PsychInfo literature search. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were present in more than 80% of the cognitively impaired patients. Prevalences ranged considerably, from 3% to 54% for delusions, 1% to 39% for hallucinations, 8% to 74% for depressed mood, 7% to 69% for anxiety, 17% to 84% for apathy, 48% to 82% for aggression or agitation, and 11% to 44% for physical aggression. Neuropsychiatric symptoms seemed to be predicted not only by dementia type or stage but also by the psychosocial environment and the amount of psychoactive medication and physical restraints used. Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common and influenced by both the disease itself and the psychosocial environment of the institutional setting. The latter may have important consequences for staff planning and education and the future design of care facilities.     

Agitation in Dutch institutionalized patients with dementia: factor analysis of the Dutch version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To establish the construct validity of the Dutch version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-D) in institutionalized patients with dementia. METHODS: The CMAI-D was administered to a large sample of 1,437 patients with moderate to severe dementia, receiving nursing home or outreaching nursing home care. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the behavioral dimensions underlying CMAI-D observations. RESULTS: A restricted 3-factor solution showed 3 factors, i.e. physical aggression, physically nonaggressive behavior and verbally agitated behavior, with prevalences of 62, 67 and 62%, respectively. An unrestricted factor solution revealed 3 additional behavioral dimensions: hiding/hoarding, vocal agitation and a factor of miscellaneous items (i.e. repetitious mannerisms, spitting), which occurred in 30, 28 and 35% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 3-factor solution of physical aggression, physically nonaggressive behavior and verbally agitated behavior corroborates earlier findings in other patient samples and therefore establishes the construct validity in institutionalized patients with severe dementia. The robustness of these findings across different care settings suggests that agitated behaviors have a common basis. In addition, unrestricted factor analysis showed 3 other important independent behavioral symptoms in dementia, but they are in fact too small to be used as a subscale. These findings might add to the taxonomy of agitation and aggression in dementia.     

血管性痴呆患者神经精神症状的临床分析

目的 了解血管性痴呆患者的神经精神症状特点.方法 采用神经精神科问卷、简易智能状态检查量表和Hachinski缺血评分量表,分别评价血管性痴呆、脑卒中后非痴呆、阿尔茨海默病和正常老年人群的神经精神症状.结果 与正常对照组比较,血管性痴呆组患者在妄想、幻觉、激越、抑郁和(或)心境恶劣、情感淡漠、易激惹和(或)不稳定、迷乱的动作行为等调查内容和神经精神科问卷总评分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05或P＜0.01);阿尔茨海默病组伴妄想者多于血管性痴呆组,组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).血管性痴呆不同严重程度组之间比较,幻觉、焦虑、情感淡漠、易激惹和(或)不稳定、迷乱的动作行为等调查项目达到统计学意义(P＜0.05或P＜0.01),且随病情的逐渐加重而症状更为明显.结论 血管性痴呆和阿尔茨海默病患者存在多种相似的神经精神症状,中至重度血管性痴呆患者表现为以情绪和情感障碍为主的神经精神症状.     

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: Importance and treatment considerations

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are frequent in people with dementia, result in distress for the people experiencing them and their caregivers, and are a common precipitant of institutional care. The safe and effective treatment of these symptoms is a key clinical priority, but is a long way from being achieved. Psychological interventions are recommended as the first line treatment strategy in most good practice guidelines, and there is emerging evidence of efficacy for agitation and depression. Neuroleptics remain the mainstay of pharmacological treatment, although meta-analyses indicate that they are mainly of benefit for the short-term (up to 12 weeks) treatment of aggression in people with Alzheimer's disease, and there have been increasing concerns about serious adverse effects including mortality. The evidence is limited for other pharmacological approaches for the treatment of agitation, and psychosis in people with Alzheimer's disease is limited, but post-hoc analyses do indicate that memantine may be a promising therapy and aromatherapy may be a useful alternative. Autopsy studies indicate that the adrenergic system may be an important therapeutic target. Clinical experience suggests that antidepressants are effective in people with severe depression in the context of dementia, but the evidence base regarding the broader value of antidepressants is far from clear. There are very few trials specifically focusing upon the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in common non-Alzheimer dementias, which is a major limitation and urgently needs to be addressed to provide an evidence base to enable the safe and effective treatment of these individuals.     

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: importance and treatment considerations

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are frequent in people with dementia, result in distress for the people experiencing them and their caregivers, and are a common precipitant of institutional care. The safe and effective treatment of these symptoms is a key clinical priority, but is a long way from being achieved. Psychological interventions are recommended as the first line treatment strategy in most good practice guidelines, and there is emerging evidence of efficacy for agitation and depression. Neuroleptics remain the mainstay of pharmacological treatment, although meta-analyses indicate that they are mainly of benefit for the short-term (up to 12 weeks) treatment of aggression in people with Alzheimer's disease, and there have been increasing concerns about serious adverse effects including mortality. The evidence is limited for other pharmacological approaches for the treatment of agitation, and psychosis in people with Alzheimer's disease is limited, but post-hoc analyses do indicate that memantine may be a promising therapy and aromatherapy may be a useful alternative. Autopsy studies indicate that the adrenergic system may be an important therapeutic target. Clinical experience suggests that antidepressants are effective in people with severe depression in the context of dementia, but the evidence base regarding the broader value of antidepressants is far from clear. There are very few trials specifically focusing upon the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in common non-Alzheimer dementias, which is a major limitation and urgently needs to be addressed to provide an evidence base to enable the safe and effective treatment of these individuals.     

The use of the neuropsychiatric inventory in nursing home residents. Characterization and measurement.

The authors assessed the validity of the nursing home version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH), comparing the responses of certified nurses' aides (CNAs) and licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) with research observations. Correlations were significant but moderate for all of the domains of the NPI-NH (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, apathy, disinhibition, euphoria, irritability/lability, and aberrant motor disturbances) except anxiety and appetite disturbance. The LVNs' ratings showed consistently higher correlations with the researchers' behavioral observations than did the CNAs', but were moderate and generally better for residents with high levels of neuropsychiatric symptoms, thus, caution should be used with any untrained rater in the nursing home setting. The NPI-NH used by non-research staff can be useful in identifying residents with significant neuropsychiatric disturbances, but may be limited as an instrument for tracking behavioral changes.     

The reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, nursing home version (NPI-NH)

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances are highly prevalent in the residents of nursing homes. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a commonly used scale for the assessment of such symptoms in diverse settings. We have conducted a study of the reliability and the validity of the Norwegian version of the NPI nursing home version (NPI-NH).METHODS: The reliability study comprised 41 patients. We established inter-rater reliability between raters with various levels of health education using kappa statistics. Fifty patients were included in the validity study. The patients were examined by a physician, who also rated the patient's behavior using "behavioral pathology in Alzheimer's disease" (BEHAVE-AD). Subsequently, a research nurse performed a standardized interview using the NPI and the Cornell scale. Concurrent validity of the NPI and the BEHAVE-AD was analyzed.RESULTS: Internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha was above 0.8. Inter-rater reliability was, except for one item, between 0.85 and 1.0 across assessors with different levels of health education. All correlations between the NPI and the BEHAVE-AD were significant, ranging from 0.38 to 0.72. The weakest correlations were between items assessing affective and anxiety symptoms.CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of the NPI-NH is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing psychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances in the residents of nursing homes. The investigation of depressive symptoms merits particular attention.