Diagnostic importance of the two-stage factor VIII:C assay demonstrated by a case of mild haemophilia associated with His1954 → Leu substitution in the factor VIII A3 domain

In some families with mild haemophilia higher results are obtained for factor VIII activity (FVII:C) determined by one-stage assay than by two-stage or chromogenic assays. Amino-acid substitutions in the A1, A2 and A3 domains of factor VIII have been described in affected individuals with this phenotype. We describe a case of mild haemophilia A in which FVIII:C measured by one-stage assay was normal at 106%. However, FVIII:C levels measured by two-stage and chromogenic assays were 18% and 35% respectively. DNA analysis revealed a novel mutation in the A3 domain of factor VIII, His1954-->Leu. In a molecular model of the FVIII A domains, His1954 is placed in close proximity to two other mutations that have previously been shown also to be associated with one-stage/two-stage discrepancies. In this patient the diagnosis of haemophilia A would be missed if only the one-stage assay was used.     

Evaluation of three automated chromogenic FVIII kits for the diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant phenotype), coagulation FVIII levels by one-stage assay (FVIII-1st) are more than double those by classical two-stage coagulation assay (FVIII-2st), and may fall within the normal range. Our aim was to assess automated two-stage chromogenic FVIII assays (FVIII-chr) for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. Three chromogenic FVIII kits (Biophen, Coamatic and Dade-Behring) were evaluated, using recommended and extended incubation times. Samples were tested from patients with discrepant haemophilia (n = 7) and equivalent mild haemophilia (agreement between FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st, n = 4). For equivalent haemophilia, FVIII-chr were consistent with FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st for all kits at all incubation times. For discrepant haemophilia, using recommended incubation times, mean FVIII-chr using Biophen reagents was 22 IU/dl (range 13-31), with Coamatic 26 (17-34) and with Dade-Behring 41 (33-47), compared with 36 (27-44) for FVIII-1st and 8 (6-9) for FVIII-2st. FVIII-chr decreased as incubation time was increased with Biophen and Coamatic, but decreased less with Dade-Behring. FVIII-chr using the Dade-Behring kit gave similar results to FVIII-1st and is not suitable for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. FVIII-chr by Biophen and Coamatic kits is suitable for diagnosis of these patients, especially with an extended incubation time.     

Familial discrepancy between the one-stage and two-stage factor VIII methods in a subgroup of patients with haemophilia A

A higher result for plasma factor VIII:C measured by the one-stage as compared with the twostage method has been described in some patients with haemophilia A or with von Willebrand's disorder. We used both methods to measure FVIII:C in 95 patients with haemophilia A. The results were equivalent in all 21 patients with severe haemophilia (16 families) and in 45 of the patients with mild or moderate haemophilia (18 families). However, the results were discrepant (FVIII: C by one-stage assay 2-7-fold higher than by two-stage assay) in the other 29 patients with mild or moderate haemophilia (12 other families). For each patient with discrepant FVIII: C results the classification was the same for all other affected members of his family. In some families with haemophilia A the gene defect leads to a discrepancy between the one-stage and twostage FVIII: C results and may be more widespread than previously recognized.     

Activation profiles of factor VIII in concentrates reflect one-stage/chromogenic potency discrepancies

We have investigated the possibility that differences in the profile of factor VIII (FVIII) activation, by thrombin, may help to explain the one-stage/chromogenic potency discrepancies in two therapeutic concentrates. A Method M concentrate and a recombinant B-domain-deleted (B-DD) concentrate were found to have one-stage/chromogenic ratios of approximately 1.15 and 0.70, respectively, relative to the World Health Organization (WHO) 6th International Standard (IS) FVIII concentrate, whether pre-diluted in FVIII-deficient plasma or buffer (+/- von Willebrand factor, VWF). The activation of FVIII, by thrombin, was followed in a buffer medium (+/- VWF) and all three concentrates showed similar times to reach peak FVIII coagulation (FVIII:C) activity. However, despite the use of equivalent amounts of FVIII:C for all three concentrates, the B-DD concentrate reached a higher peak level and maintained higher FVIII:C compared with the WHO 6th IS throughout the incubation period, whereas the Method M concentrate reached a lower peak level and maintained lower FVIII:C throughout the incubation period. We propose that the higher levels of FVIII:C found with the B-DD concentrate and the lower levels with the Method M concentrate, following activation, may be reflected in the potencies obtained by the chromogenic method and may be consistent with one-stage/chromogenic ratios of < 1.0 and > 1.0 respectively.     

Tyr346→Cys mutation results in factor VIII:C assay discrepancy and a normal bleeding phenotype – is this mild haemophilia A?

Summary.  Patients with mild haemophilia A may have a discrepancy in the factor VIII (FVIII) level when measured with a one-stage assay (FVIII:C1) compared with a two-stage assay (FVIII:C2). This discrepancy usually results in the one-stage level being higher than the two-stage level. A F8 mutation resulting in a Tyr346→Cys substitution within the a1 interdomain region has been described which results in the converse assay discrepancy. We report four individuals (three families) who have this mutation. Mean FVIII:C1 level was 25 IU dL⁻¹ compared with a mean FVIII:C2 level of 63 IU dL⁻¹. These individuals had presented opportunistically and did not have a clinically significant bleeding disorder. The bleeding phenotype correlated with the two-stage assay result rather than the one-stage result. FVIII replacement therapy does not appear to be required for these individuals.     

Normalization of factor VIII levels in a patient with mild haemophilia A during a 35-year period

We report the case of a 45-year-old man who was diagnosed in June 1969 9 years old as having mild haemophilia A following a traumatic left shoulder bleed when his factor VIII (FVIII) activity was 11 IU dL(-1) based on a two-stage assay. The bleed resolved following treatment with intravenous cryoprecipitate. There was no family history of haemophilia. Cryoprecipitate infusions were required to treat further traumatic bleeds between 1971 and 1981. During this time, his FVIII activity was confirmed at 14 IU dL(-1). He defaulted many hospital appointments until 1991 when his FVIII activity had risen to 42 IU dL(-1). There was no evidence of infection, inflammatory or liver disease to account for this change. By 2005 he had a normal FVIII activity of 62 IU dL(-1) based on a one-stage assay. FVIII gene analysis confirmed a codon 531 mutation. It appeared that the discrepant FVIII results related to whether a two-stage or one-stage assay was used that has been previously reported for other patients with these mutations. We felt it important to raise awareness that this phenomenon may lead to apparent correction of haemophilia A.     

A Tyr346-->Cys substitution in the interdomain acidic region a1 of factor VIII in an individual with factor VIII:C assay discrepancy

The interdomain acidic region a1 is a unique structural feature of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and may mediate the proteolytic activation of FVIII and the inactivation of FVIIIa. We report an individual with a Tyr346-->Cys substitution within region a1, who presented with a one-stage FVIII activity (FVIII:C) of 0.34 iu/ml (normal range 0.5-2.0) but normal two-stage FVIII:C and FVIII antigen values. In a factor Xa (FXa)-generation assay for FVIII in which the activation time with thrombin was varied, the variant plasma showed normal FVIII:C at both short and long activation times. However, at intermediate activation times the FXa generation of the variant plasma was less than that of normal pooled plasma. In a modified one-stage FVIII:C assay in which partially purified FVIII was activated with thrombin at low concentrations, the variant FVIII showed less activation than wild-type FVIII, although this defect corrected with increasing concentrations of thrombin. When partially purified variant FVIII was activated with a large molar excess of thrombin, the subsequent rate of decay of FVIII:C was greater for variant FVIII. The complex defects in activation and inactivation displayed by FVIII Tyr346-->Cys support the hypothesis that the a1 sequence is a key regulator of FVIII activity.     

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with mutations causing factor VIII assay discrepancy

Summary. Up to 40% of patients with mild haemophilia A have a discrepancy whereby factor VIII (FVIII) measurements by a two‐stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:C_CH) are disproportionately reduced compared with the FVIII one‐stage clotting value (FVIII:C). Which assay best reflects the coagulation potential and clinical phenotype in this patient group is of clinical significance, yet remains unclear. We have assessed the global coagulant ability of haemophilia patients with FVIII assay discrepancy using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). A total of 18 patients with mutations Arg531His/Cys or Arg698Trp causing FVIII discrepancy were investigated, together with 12 haemophilia patients with concordant FVIII values and 15 normal controls. Factor VIII levels in all patients and controls were measured using both one‐stage clotting assay and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation was assessed in platelet‐poor plasma by CAT using a low tissue factor concentration (1 pm ). FVIII:C_CH values were below normal in all patients, and in the discrepant group were between 1.5‐ and 8‐fold lower than FVIII:C values. CAT parameters were affected in all haemophilia patients. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was reduced to 58–67% of the mean normal value (1301 nm min^?1), whereas peak thrombin was further reduced to 27–30% of the mean normal value (178 nm ) in both discrepant and concordant patient groups. Analysis of the discrepant patient group showed the most significant correlation between the one‐stage FVIII:C assay and ETP (r² = 0.44) and peak thrombin parameters (r² = 0.27).     

Diagnosis of factor VIII deficiency

Summary.  The correct diagnosis of factor VIII deficiency and the assessment of severity of the disease are essential for a patient-tailored treatment strategy. An optimal diagnostic procedure comprises sensitive and specific screening methods and factor VIII activity assays. Different screening reagents show variable characteristics and receiver operator characteristic curves are presented showing the relation between sensitivity and specificity of eleven activated partial thromboplastin time reagents. The details of the three methods for factor VIII activity assay, one-stage and two-stage assay and chromogenic assays, are discussed. The chromogenic assay seems to be more sensitive than the one-stage assay with regard to the detection of severe haemophilia. Discrepant results obtained with one-stage and two-stage assays are reviewed and discussed.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of OBI-1, a recombinant B domain-deleted porcine factor VIII, in subjects with haemophilia A

Summary. OBI‐1 is a recombinant B‐domain deleted porcine factor VIII (FVIII). FVIII treatment in those with haemophilia A may be complicated by the development of anti‐FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) leading to a failure to respond to treatment with human FVIII. To compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single dose of OBI‐1 with Hyate:C in subjects with haemophilia A and inhibitors, subjects were randomized to receive either Hyate:C followed by placebo or placebo followed by OBI‐1 in a double‐blind fashion. FVIII levels were assayed using both a one‐stage coagulation assay (OSCA) and chromogenic assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters for FVIII were calculated for 6/9 subjects randomized; in three subjects baseline anti‐porcine FVIII inhibitors led to a lack of measurable FVIII activity. Mean C_max appeared higher for OBI‐1 (OSCA: 176.00 U dL^?1, standard deviation ± 88.00; chromogenic: 151.00 ± 31.51 U dL^?1) than Hyate:C (OSCA: 82.3 ± 19.22 U dL^?1; chromogenic: 52.67 ± 13.8 U dL^?1). Mean AUC also appeared higher for OBI‐1 (OSCA: 2082.87 ± 1323.43 U h^?1dL^?1; chromogenic: 1817.28 ± 625.14 U h^?1dL^?1) than Hyate:C (OSCA: 1177.8 ± 469.49 U h^?1dL^?1; chromogenic: 707.61 ± 420.05 U h^?1dL^?1). Two infusion‐related events occurred: one with Hyate:C, one with placebo. Four of five subjects without anti‐porcine FVIII inhibitors at baseline remained porcine FVIII inhibitor negative 29 days after infusion. A single dose of OBI‐1 appears to have higher bioavailability than Hyate:C in subjects with haemophilia A without measurable anti‐porcine FVIII inhibitors, and is well tolerated. These results should be confirmed in a larger phase 2/3 study.     

Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and factor IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective

Summary.  The high cost and limited availability of factor concentrates make dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) a crucial issue in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. It has often been recommended that this treatment should aim to maintain a minimum plasma level of 1% of normal coagulation factor activity (FVIII:C or FIX:C). The dosage needed is commonly given as 25–40 U kg⁻¹ three times weekly for FVIII or twice weekly for FIX. However, these guidelines are valid only with several qualifications. First, the actual trough levels required may vary considerably between patients. The clinical severity of haemophilia may depend on more factors than the endogenous level of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Secondly, interindividual variations in dose requirements are also due to variance in the pharmacokinetics of the coagulation factors. Pharmacokinetic calculations are useful to design optimal dosing schedules to achieve required trough levels of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Moreover, tailoring of the dosing of FVIII or FIX according to their disposition in the individual patient can markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatment. However, the usefulness of in vivo recovery as a guide for prophylactic dosing seems questionable. It should be clearly understood that maintaining a certain trough level of FVIII:C or FIX:C is not an end in itself. Clinical outcome, not the achieved trough level, determines whether a dosage is adequate. Chiefly for economic reasons, the minimum effective dosage of coagulation factor should be determined and used in every patient. The dose requirement should also be re-evaluated at appropriate times.     

A modified chromogenic assay for the measurement of very low levels of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C)

A precise and sensitive chromogenic assay for the measurement of very low levels of factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma has been developed. The assay is based on modifications of a commercially available chromogenic assay. The modifications include reduction of sample final dilution factor and prolongation of the development period. The modified assay allows accurate and precise measurement of FVIII in the range of 0.001-0.02 IU mL(-1). The detection limit is 0.0005 IU mL(-1) and the quantitation limit is 0.0015 IU mL(-1). This assay can be used in research and to study the clinical efficacy of low circulating levels of FVIII in haemophilia A patients.     

Influence of factor VIII on overall coagulability and fibrinolytic potential of haemophilic plasma as measured by global assay: monitoring in haemophilia A

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the analytical sensitivity of the recently developed Clot Formation and Lysis (CloFAL) global assay for factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, both in vitro and ex vivo, to determine whether this global assay is influenced by FVIII inhibitors, and to investigate the coagulative response to FVIII replacement in haemophilia A patients using the CloFAL assay in comparison with FVIII activity. Among adults and children alike, the CloFAL assay coagulation index (CI) was significantly decreased in FVIII-deficient vs. healthy subjects (adults median CI: 2% vs. 94% respectively; children median CI: 3% vs. 63%; P < 0.001 for each), and correlated significantly with activated partial thromboplastin time-based FVIII activity across all individuals (r = 0.78; P < 0.001). The CloFAL assay was analytically sensitive to deficient FVIII activity and also influenced by the presence of von Willebrand factor. Severe haemophilia A patients without inhibitory antibodies to FVIII showed considerable heterogeneity in CloFAL assay waveforms, despite a uniformly diminished CI of 0-1%. During FVIII infusion half-life studies in patients with severe haemophilia A, the CloFAL assay demonstrated a marked rise in coagulability 30 min following infusion, with progressive decrease in coagulability towards baseline over the ensuing 48-h period. In each case, the profile of coagulative response to FVIII infusion as determined by CloFAL assay CI differed qualitatively from that measured by FVIII activity. These findings indicate that the CloFAL assay may be useful as an adjunctive test to FVIII activity measurements in the therapeutic monitoring of haemophilia A.     

High plasma levels of factor VIII and risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between factor VIII (FVIII) levels, measured by chromogenic and clotting assays, and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. A total of 564 patients underwent clinical follow-up after oral anticoagulant withdrawal (total follow-up = 924.4 years). Recurrent VTE developed in 39 of 309 (12.6%) patients with a first idiopathic VTE and in 14 of 255 (5.5%) patients whose first event was secondary. In patients with a first idiopathic VTE, the risk of recurrence was more than fivefold higher in patients with FVIII levels exceeding the 90th percentile [chromogenic FVIII: relative risk (RR) 5.43 (95% CI 1.76-16.8); clotting FVIII: RR 6.21 (95% CI 1.57-24.5)] after adjustment for all possible confounding variables. In patients with a first secondary VTE, the risk of recurrence was slightly higher in patients with high FVIII levels [chromogenic FVIII: RR 2.62 (95% CI 0.34-19.9); clotting FVIII: RR 1.74 (95% CI 0.25-12.1)], but, given the low number of recurrences, the 95% CI were very large. In conclusion, this study shows that high FVIII levels are associated with increased risk of VTE recurrence in patients with a first idiopathic VTE. Although the measurement of FVIII levels by a specific chromogenic assay might, in principle, be preferred to avoid the risk of aspecific clotting effects, no significant differences in results obtained by chromogenic or clotting methods were found.     

In vivo recovery of factor VIII and factor IX: intra- and interindividual variance in a clinical setting

In vivo recovery (IVR) is traditionally used as a parameter to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of coagulation factors. It has also been suggested that dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) can be adjusted according to the need of the individual patient, based on an individually determined IVR value. This approach, however, requires that the individual IVR value is more reliably representative for the patient than the mean value in the population, i.e. that there is less variance within than between the individuals. The aim of this investigation was to compare intra- and interindividual variance in IVR (as U dL1 per U kg1) for FVIII and plasma-derived FIX in a cohort of non-bleeding patients with haemophilia. The data were collected retrospectively from six clinical studies, yielding 297 IVR determinations in 50 patients with haemophilia A and 93 determinations in 13 patients with haemophilia B. For FVIII, the mean variance within patients exceeded the between-patient variance. Thus, an individually determined IVR value is apparently no more informative than an average, or population, value for the dosing of FVIII. There was no apparent relationship between IVR and age of the patient (1.5-67 years). For FIX, the mean variance within patients was lower than the between-patient variance, and there was a significant positive relationship between IVR and age (13-69 years). From these data, it seems probable that using an individual IVR confers little advantage in comparison to using an age-specific population mean value. Dose tailoring of coagulation factor treatment has been applied successfully after determination of the entire single-dose curve of FVIII:C or FIX:C in the patient and calculation of the relevant pharmacokinetic parameters. However, the findings presented here do not support the assumption that dosing of FVIII or FIX can be individualized on the basis of a clinically determined IVR value.     

Potency and mass of factor VIII in FVIII products

Summary.  Several factor (F) VIII products of different origin and structure are being used for haemophilia A treatment worldwide. The assessment of FVIII concentration in these products is done using activity assays, which are dependent upon the assay and its modifications. To evaluate FVIII products for potency and for FVIII concentration and specific activity, three activity-based assays [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), intrinsic FXase and synthetic coagulation proteome] and two immunoassays (ELISA and western blotting) were used in this study with albumin-free full-length recombinant (r) FVIII as a standard. In all activity assays, products A and B (both contain full-length rFVIII) at 1 U mL⁻¹ showed potency similar to that of the 0.7 n m (1 U mL⁻¹) rFVIII standard. Product E (contains truncated rFVIII) was less potent in the APTT (83% of standard) and product C (contains plasma FVIII) was less potent in FXase assays (66%). The ELISA immunoassay revealed that the specific activity of FVIII proteins in products A–C and E varied over a wide range (3900–13 200 U mg⁻¹) and was higher for most lots when compared with the standard (5000 U mg⁻¹), whereas the specific activity of product D (contains plasma FVIII) was lower than expected (3200–4800 U mg⁻¹). (i) FVIII potency estimated in different assays gives dissimilar results; (ii) the specific activity of FVIII in various FVIII products is different and inconsistent. Thus, the administration of an equal FVIII potency in units means the administration of different amounts of FVIII protein, which may partly explain apparent discrepancies in product performance.     

Method validation and clinical utility of chromogenic factor VIII assay compared to one-stage assay

The chromogenic FVIII assay is currently considered the gold standard for quantitation of factor VIII levels in both haemophilia A patients and as part of screening for thrombophilia. A method validation and evaluation of clinical utility within a routine diagnostic laboratory was undertaken by comparing the currently used one-stage assay to a commercially available chromogenic assay (Siemens, Johannesburg, South Africa). In total, 60 samples were included in this study to encompass the whole diagnostic range of the assay. Both low and high values showed very good correlation on linear regression analysis with correlation coeffients of 0.949 and 0.888 respectively. However, the lower detection limit of the Siemens Chromogenic assay was 1.5 IU/dL rendering it impossible to utilize in the setting of classifying a haemophilia A patient in terms of disease severity. Although the Siemens FVIII chromogenic assay shows excellent correlation to the currently used one-stage assay, the relatively high detection limit restrict implementation as a stand-alone assay in a routine diagnostic laboratory.     

von Willebrand factor in factor VIII concentrates protects against neutralization by factor VIII antibodies of haemophilia A patients

We investigated the neutralization activity of factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies of 12 haemophilia A patients, acquired during treatment with plasma-derived FVIII concentrates. All plasma samples, drawn in a clinically stable situation before any immunotolerance treatment, contained anti-A2 domain and anti-light-chain FVIII antibodies. In nine patients' plasmas, containing relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies (53-96%), a higher neutralization activity was found against recombinant FVIII concentrate (Recombinate) than against plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (vWF)-containing concentrate (Haemoctin SDH). No difference in neutralization of the two concentrates was found in two patients' plasmas with almost equal content of FVIII light- and heavy-chain antibodies, or one plasma with predominantly heavy-chain antibodies. These results suggest that haemophilia A patients with relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies in plasma might benefit by infusion of FVIII concentrates containing vWF because vWF appears to have some protective effect on FVIII. This hypothesis should be tested by a clinical study.