Clinical Efficacy of Topiramate as Add-On Therapy in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: The European Experience

Summary: In three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on European trials, target daily topiramate (TPM) dosages of 400, 600, and 800 mg/day (200, 300, and 400 mg bid) were evaluated in adults with refractory partial seizures with or without becoming secondarily generalized. Median reductions from baseline in monthly seizure rate were 41% with TPM 400 mg/day vs. 1% with placebo ( n = 0.065), 46% with TPM 600 mg/day compared to -12% (a 12% increase) with placebo ( p ≤ 0.005), and 36% with TPM 800 mg/day versus –18% (an 18% increase) with placebo ( p ≤ 0.001). Differences between TPM and placebo with respect to percent responders (percent of patients demonstrating a 50% or greater reduction in seizures) significantly favored TPM ( p ≤ 0.05) at all three target dosages. Significant reductions in secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures compared to placebo were also observed with 400 mg/day ( p = 0.002) and 800 mg/day ( p < 0.05) of TPM. TPM appears to be a promising new antiepileptic drug for use as adjunctive therapy in adults with refractory partial epilepsy.     

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Topiramate as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Refractory Partial Seizures

Summary: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, we compared topiramate (TPM) with placebo as addon therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. TPM was titrated either to the target dosage of 800 mg/ day [400 mg twice daily (b. i. d.)] or to the maximal tolerated dose if lower. Twenty-eight (28) patients were randomized to each treatment group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the net median percent reduction relative to placebo in average monthly seizure rate was 54% for patients in the TPM group (p < 0.001). None of the placebo-treated patients and 43% of the patients treated with TPM experienced 250% reduction in seizures (p = 0.001), and 36% of patients assigned to TPM had a 75–100% reduction in seizures (p < 0.01). Secondarily generalized seizures were also significantly reduced in the TPM group (p = 0.044). The most common adverse events (AE) reported in the TPM group were fatigue, impaired concentation, weight loss, dizziness, and paresthesias. AE occurring either during the rapid titration of TPM or at high dosages led 21% of TPM-treated patients to withdraw from the study. Half of these occurred during the titration study period. No serious AE or clinically important changes in clinical laboratory measures were observed. The present study further establishes the favorable profile and good benefithisk ratio of TPM in resistant partial epilepsy.     

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Topiramate (600 mg Daily) for the Treatment of Refractory Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to evaluate adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures with topiramate (TPM) for efficacy and safety in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study.
Methods : Sixty outpatients with epilepsy (47 men and 13 women, mean age 32.9 years) were studied. All had a documented history of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures. After an 8-week baseline during which patients had at least one seizure per week, 30 patients each were randomized to TPM 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or placebo for 12 weeks.
Results : TPM was significantly superior to placebo, as indicated by all efficacy assessments: greater median percent reduction from baseline in the average monthly seizure rate (46 vs. -12%, p = 0.004); greater number of treatment responders (patients with 50% reduction in seizure rate) (47 vs. 10%, p = 0.001), and better investigator (p = 0.002) and patient (p = 0.010) global assessments of treatment. Among TPM-treated patients, the most commonly reported adverse events (AE) were headache, somnolence, fatigue, dizziness, and abnormal thinking. Most AE were mild or moderate in severity.
Conclusions : The results of the present trial indicate that TPM 600 mgiday is effective in the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures.     

Topiramate in refractory epilepsy: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE: This prospective observational study explored the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate (TPM) in patients with refractory epilepsy attending a single outpatient clinic. METHODS: One hundred seventy patients (82 men, 88 women, aged 18-75 years) with refractory localization-related (n = 134) or idiopathic generalized epilepsy (n = 36) were started on adjunctive TPM using a standard titration schedule. TPM was introduced after a 3-month prospective baseline, and doses were adjusted according to clinical response. End points were seizure freedom for 6 months, > or =50% seizure reduction for 6 months compared with baseline at the highest tolerated TPM dose (responder), or discontinuation of TPM because of side effects, lack of efficacy, or both. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (23%) patients were seizure-free, and 80 (47%) more patients had a useful therapeutic response. Thirteen seizure-free patients and 16 responders took 100 mg of TPM daily or less. TPM was discontinued in 51 (30%) patients. The most common side effects resulting in withdrawal were fatigue, weight loss, irritability, paresthesia, depression, and headache. Concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were stopped in 30 patients. Twelve were established on TPM monotherapy, eight of whom remained seizure-free. Final TPM doses and concentrations varied widely among the three outcome groups. CONCLUSIONS: TPM was efficacious as add-on and monotherapy in patients with refractory partial and generalized seizures in everyday clinical use. A good response was obtained in many patients with TPM doses substantially lower than those studied in regulatory clinical trials. The wide variation in dose-response and dose-toxicity relationships may reflect different neurobiologies causing refractory epilepsy and differential efficacy of AED combinations.     

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial of D-α-Tocopherol (Vitamin E) as Add-on Therapy in Uncontrolled Epilepsy

Summary: In a double-blind, cross-over trial, vitamin E, and placebo were compared as add-on therapy in 43 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. The study consisted of a 3-month baseline period followed by two treatment phases of vitamin E or placebo with cross-over to the second phase after 3 months. No significant side effects were noted during the study. Mean seizure frequency in the baseline period was 15.9 ± 10.5 as compared with 11.8 ± 10.9 during the placebo phase and 13.7 ± 11.1 during the vitamin E phase. No significant change in seizure frequency was observed with vitamin E as compared with placebo (p > 0.1). Similar observation was noted in subgroups with generalized seizures (n = 25), partial with secondarily generalized seizures (n = 11), or complex partial seizures (CPS) (n = 7). This study did not corroborate the earlier claims of therapeutic efficacy of vitamin E as add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy in adults.     

Topiramate as Adjunctive Therapy in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Pooled Analysis of Data from Five Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Summary: A pooled analysis of data from five similarly designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of topiramate (TPM) as add-on therapy in patients with partial epilepsy was performed. The pooled analysis allowed evaluation of efficacy end points and response to treatment for a number of study subgroups not statistically evaluable in the individual study analyses due to limited sample sizes. The five trials included 534 patients, 360 who received TPM at target dosages of 200-1,000 mg daily and 174 who received placebo. In the intent-to-treat pooled analysis, TPM was significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) superior to placebo in reducing total seizures by ≥ 75% or by 100%. When seizure types were evaluated independently, TPM significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) reduced the frequency of simple partial, complex partial, and secondarily generalized seizures. TPM was significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) better than placebo regardless of gender, patient age, baseline seizure rate, and concomitant AEDs. The efficacy of TPM in partial epilepsy is consistent across efficacy end points and across strata defined by study population characteristics.     

Dose-dependent safety and efficacy of zonisamide: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory partial seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (> or =50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of "all seizures" and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose-response relation was observed (p < 0.0001).The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase. CONCLUSIONS: ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Expanding Antiepileptic Drug Options: Clinical Efficacy of New Therapeutic Agents

Summary: Results of double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trials of topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) in refractory partial epilepsy were reviewed. In three European multicenter studies of TPM, the clinical efficacy of 400–, 600–, and 800-mg/day target dosages was demonstrated. In a similarly designed United States trial, LTG was significantly superior to placebo at a 500-mg/day dosage but not at a 300-mg/day dosage. A meta-analysis of a number of smaller trials of VGB suggests that a ≥50% reduction in seizures is observed in approximately 45% of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. All of these newer antiepileptic drugs have shown efficacy in well-controlled trials and should contribute significantly to our ability to manage partial epilepsy.     

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.     

Topiramate in refractory partial-onset seizures in children, adolescents and young adults: a multicentric open trial

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) in refractory partial epilepsy in children, adolescents and young adults. Methods: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 55 patients (age 2-30 years, mean 15 years) with refractory partial seizures. Topiramate was added to one or two other baseline drugs and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: TPM was initiated at a daily dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg, followed by a 2-week titration at increments of 1-3 mg/kg/24h, up to a maximum daily dose of 12 mg/kg. After 9 months of treatment, 11 patients (20%) had 100% fewer seizures and 25 patients (45%) had a more than 50% seizure reduction. TPM appeared to be effective both in cryptogenic (76.2%) and symptomatic (58.8%) partial epilepsies. Mild to moderate adverse events were present in 25 patients (45.4%), mostly represented by drowsiness, nervousness and hyporexia with or without weight loss. CONCLUSION: TPM was an overall effective and safe add-on drug both in cryptogenic and symptomatic childhood refractory partial seizures, the adverse reactions being generally mild or moderate.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults with ≥4 partial‐onset seizures (simple or complex, with or without secondary generalization) per 4 weeks despite treatment with 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This multicenter, parallel‐group study had an 8‐week, single‐blind, placebo baseline phase, after which patients were randomized to placebo (n = 102) or once‐daily ESL 400 mg (n = 100), 800 mg (n = 98), or 1,200 mg (n = 102) in the double‐blind treatment phase. ESL starting dose was 400 mg; thereafter, ESL was titrated at weekly 400‐mg steps to the full maintenance dose (12 weeks). Results: Seizure frequency adjusted per 4 weeks over the maintenance period (primary endpoint) was significantly lower than placebo in the ESL 1,200‐mg (p = 0.0003) and 800‐mg (p = 0.0028) groups [analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of log‐transformed seizure frequency]. Responder rate was 20% (placebo), 23% (400 mg), 34% (800 mg), and 43% (1,200 mg). Median relative reduction in seizure frequency was 16% (placebo), 26% (400 mg), 36% (800 mg), and 45% (1,200 mg). The most frequent concomitant AEDs were carbamazepine (56–62% of patients), lamotrigine (25–27%), and valproic acid (22–28%). Similar efficacy results were obtained in patients administered ESL with or without carbamazepine as concomitant AED. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events (AEs) were 3.9% (placebo), 4% (400 mg), 8.2% (800 mg), and 19.6% (1,200 mg). AEs in >10% of any group were dizziness, headache, and diplopia. Most AEs were mild or moderate. Discussion: ESL, 800 and 1,200 mg once‐daily, was well tolerated and more effective than placebo in patients who were refractory to treatment with one or two concomitant AEDs.     

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性

目的 评价唑尼沙胺(ZNS)作为添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性.方法 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、添加治疗设计.240例确诊为癫(癎)部分性发作的受试者按照1:1的比例随机分配到ZNS治疗组或安慰剂组.在前4周加鼋期内受试者自100 mg/d逐渐加量至300 mg/d,随后进入12周的稳定治疗期.在稳定期内可根据患者情况酌情减量,或加量至最大剂量400 mg/d.有效性评价的主要指标为稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线值减少百分数的中位值,重要的次要评价指标为有效率,即部分性癫(癎)发作次数减少≥50%者的比例.同时对药物的安全性进行评价.结果 ZNS组受试者稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线期减少百分数(48.4%)显著高于安慰剂组(26.6%),组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.904,P=0.028);ZNS组治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效率(48.6%)高于安慰剂组(34.9%),差异有统计学意义(X2=4.046,P=0.044),其中以复杂部分性癫(癎)的组间差异最为显著(分别为52.2%和33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018).ZNS组与安慰剂组不良事件发生率相当,与ZNS相关的不良事件多为头晕、头痛、嗜睡、食欲下降、恶心等.结论 ZNS能有效治疗部分性癫(癎),降低癫(癎)发作频率,对复杂部分性癫(癎)发作治疗效果尤为突出.ZNS耐受性良好,受试者用药安全性较高.     

Efficacy of Topiramate as Adjunctive Therapy in Refractory Partial Seizures: United States Trial Experience

Summary: In companion double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials performed in the United States, topiramate (TPM) daily target dosages of 200-1,000 mg/day were evaluated as add-on therapy in adults with refractory partial seizures with or without becoming secondarily generalized. Net reductions in median monthly seizure frequency (active drug minus placebo) with the most efficacious dosages of TPM were 35% in the low-dose trial and 40% in the high-dose trial. Substantial reductions in secondarily generalized seizures were also observed with TPM. TPM appears to be an efficacious new antiepileptic drug in the management of partial epilepsy.     

Effects of topiramate versus other antiepileptic drugs on the cognitive function of patients With epilepsy

BACKGROUND： Only very large dose of topiramate has neurotoxicity, indicating that topiramate has low neurotoxicity and high safety. The residual rate of topiramate is affected by many cognitive-related adverse effects. Patients who take topiramate often accompany with thought slowness, difficulty in finding words, dyscalculia, blunt reaction, attention decreasing, memory deterioration, etc. OBJECTIVE： To compare the effects of topiramate with traditional anti-epileptic drugs （including carbamazepine and Valproic acid （VPA） on cognitive function of patients with epilepsy. DESIGN： Observational experiment, self-control and intergroup comparison. SETTING： Sichuan Academy of Medical Science. PARTICIPANTS： Eighty-seven inpatients and outpatients with newly diagnosed epilepsy who received preliminary diagnosis and follow-up in the Department of Neurology, Sichuan People＇s Hospital between January 2004 and June 2006 were involved in this survey. They were diagnosed according to disease history and electroencephalogram （EEG）. The onset type was diagnosed following the definition of epilepsy and epileptic syndrome in 1989 International Anti-epileptic League. The involved patients and their relatives were informed of detection and therapeutic regimen. The patients were assigned into two groups according to table of random digit： traditional antiepileptic drugs group （AEDs group, n =44） and topiramate （TPM） group （n =43）. METHODS： （1）Among the patients in AEDs group, carbamazepine was the first choice for 21 patients with partial seizures or partial secondarily generalized seizures, and VPA for 23 patients with generalized seizures. The initial dose of carbamazepine was 300 mg/d, and that of VPA was 500 mg/d. Patients in the TPM group took TPM with the initial dose of 25 mg/d, increased by 25 mg/d each week to target dose 150 mg/d within 8 weeks. （2） Curative effect was graded into 4 degrees： markedly effective, effective, ineffective and aggravated. Total effective rate was calculated. （3） Cognitive function of patients was tested before and 6 months after administration by using Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale（WAIS） or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children （WISC, Chinese edition）, （Higher scores indicated better cognitive function）, Stroop color word interference, test of memory of past numbers, test of telling the names of fruits and vegetables within 1 minute （Shorter time for reading word, telling color and memory of past numbers demonstrated better cognitive function. Less errors in reading words, telling colors and memory of past numbers, numbering and telling the names of fruits and vegetables within 1 minute indicated better cognitive function）, etc. totally 22 items. （4） t test and paired t test were used for measurement data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： Clinical curative effects and adverse reactions as well as neurological tests. RESULTS： Eighty-four pationts praticipated final analysis and 3 dropped out. （1） Inthe AEDS group and TPM group, total effective rate was 86% and 99%, respectively. （2） In the AEDs group, there were no significant changes in the scores of each test of WIS before and after treatment （P 〉 0.05）. In the TPM group, total IQ, word scores, verbal IQ and digit span scores were significantly decreased （ t =2.097 - 4.423, P 〈 0.05 - 0.01 ） .Following treatment, the time for reading word and telling color for patients in the AEDs group was prolonged in Stroop color interference test （ t = - 2.304, - 2.454, P 〈 0.05 ）, and time for reading word and memory of past numbers for patients in the topiramate group was significantly prolonged （ t = - 3.054, 2.272, P 〈 0.01, 0.05 ）. （3）There were no significant differences in scores of WIS before and after treatment in AEDs group and TPM group （P 〉 0.05）. Following treatment, verbal IQ, word scores, total IQ, digit span of patients in the TPM group were significantly lower than those in the AEDs group （t =2.052 - 3.297, P 〈 0.05- 0.01 ） .There were no significant differences in Stroop color word interference, memory of past numbers and telling the names of fruits and vegetables within 1 minute before and after treatment in AEDs group and TPM group （P 〉 0.05）. CONCLUSION： （1） Moderate and small doses of both TPM and AEDs may lead to mild cognitive function impairment of patients, mainly presenting delayed reaction and decreased sensitivity. （2）TPM mainly influences attention, language comprehension ability and fluency, while AEDs cause delayed reaction easily, but influence executive function mainly.     

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) 2,400 mg/day versus OXC 300 mg/day monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. BACKGROUND: OXC is primarily metabolized by reductase enzymes and, consequently, has a low propensity to inhibit or induce oxidative enzymes and a minimal potential for drug-drug interactions. The efficacy of OXC as monotherapy was shown in several comparative trials in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in hospitalized patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial design was chosen to assess the antiepileptic efficacy of OXC as monotherapy in a refractory epilepsy patient population. Outpatients aged 12 years or older with inadequately controlled partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalized seizures, were enrolled. Patients finished the trial by completing the double-blind phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria: a twofold increase in partial seizure frequency in any 28-day period relative to baseline; a twofold increase in the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency relative to baseline; occurrence of a single generalized seizure if none occurred during the 6 months prior to randomization; or prolongation or worsening of generalized seizure duration or frequency requiring intervention. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the OXC 2400 mg/day group (14/34; 41%) than the OXC 300 mg/day group (42/45; 93%). In addition, there was a significant difference in time to exit in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 12% of patients in the OXC 2400 mg/day group were seizure-free compared with none in the 300 mg/day group. OXC was well-tolerated, with dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea being the most frequent AEs. Most of these AEs were transient and rated as mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: OXC is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with partial epilepsy previously receiving treatment with other antiepileptic drugs. The results of this trial are consistent with previous monotherapy trials with OXC.     

Topiramate in medically intractable partial epilepsies: double-blind placebo-controlled randomized parallel group trial. Korean Topiramate Study Group

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as add-on therapy in medically intractable partial epilepsies. Methods: We used a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized parallel-group trial consisting of 12 weeks of baseline phase, 10 weeks of titration phase, and 8 weeks of stabilization phase. The primary efficacy variable was the median seizure frequency reduction rate (MSFRR), and the other efficacy variables included responder rate, seizure-free rate, and global evaluations by the patient and the physician. The patient should have partial epilepsies refractory to the maximally tolerable doses of one to two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and should have two or more episodes of clinical seizures every 4 weeks during the baseline phase. The target dose of study drugs was 600 mg/day. The study drugs were started at the initial dose of 50 mg/day and gradually increased to the target dose over a 10-week period. Results: A total of 177 patients was randomized into the TPM group (n = 91) and the placebo (PLC) group (n = 86). Baseline median seizure frequencies were 5.6 episodes/4 weeks in the TPM and the PLC groups. Among those who were randomized, 174 patients (TPM, 89 patients; PLC, 85 patients) were available for the efficacy measurement by intention-to-treat analysis. The MSFRR was 51.3% for TPM and 9.1% for PLC, which was highly in favor of TPM (p = 0.0001). The responder rate was 50.6% for TPM and 12.9% for PLC (p = 0.001). Seven (7.9%) of 89 patients taking TPM became seizure free compared with one (1.2%) of 85 patients taking PLC (p = 0.004). The global evaluation greatly favored TPM (p = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the TPM (81.3%) than in the PLC (48.9%) group, with central nervous system (CNS)-related AEs being the most frequent. Among individual AEs, anorexia (20.9%) and abdominal pain or discomfort (20.9%) were the most common AEs in the TPM group. AEs precipitated early drop-out in seven (7.6%) patients taking TPM and three (3.5%) patients taking PLC. No serious systemic AEs were observed. Conclusions: TPM was highly effective and safe as add-on therapy in medically intractable partial epilepsies. Slower titration of TPM might be responsible for the lesser drop-out rate than previous trials, but the incidence of AEs was still high. The AE profile of TPM in Koreans was different from that in whites.     

Topiramate Monotherapy for Partial Onset Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Evaluation of topiramate (TPM) as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.
Methods: A total of 48 patients were evaluated in a doubleblind, parallel-group trial. During a 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial onset seizures while being treated with one or two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). After 1–2 weeks of open-label treatment with TPM 100 mg/day, patients were randomly assigned, in equal proportions, to receive double-blind therapy with TPM 100 or 1,000 mg/day in a 5-week conversion and an 11-week monotherapy period. The study endpoint was completion of 112 study days (success) or fulfillment of one or more exit criteria: doubling of average 28- day or highest 2-day baseline seizure rate, a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) if none had occurred at baseline, or significant prolongation of generalized seizure duration.
Results: Time until exit was longer (p = 0.002) and success frequency was higher (p = 0.005) with TPM 1,000 as compared with 100 mg/day. Seizure-rate reductions of 50, 75, or 100% were achieved by 46, 25, and 13% of the 1,000-mg/day group, respectively, as compared with 13, 8, and 0% of the 100-mg/day group, respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were mild or moderate in severity.
Conclusions: Monotherapy with TPM 1,000 mg/day for partial onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures was effective, with a favorable safety profile.     

Gabapentin as Add-On Therapy in Children with Refractory Partial Seizures: A 12-Week, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years. METHODS: After a 6-week baseline period, 247 patients (54 centres) entered a 12-week double-blind phase and were randomized to receive either GBP (t.i.d., titrated to 23-35 mg/kg/ day) or placebo. Seizure activity and type were recorded daily. Efficacy variables included Response Ratio (RRatio), responder rate, and percentage change in frequency (PCH) for all partial seizures; PCH and RRatio for individual types of partial seizures; and investigator and parent/guardian global assessments of seizure frequency and patient well-being. RESULTS: RRatio for all partial seizures was significantly lower (better) for GBP-treated patients (p = 0.0407). Responder rate favored GBP, but the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Median PCH for all partial seizures for the GBP treatment group (-17.0%) was better than that for the placebo group (-6.5%). Median PCH for specific seizure types showed GBP to be most effective in controlling complex partial seizures (-35%) and secondarily generalized seizures (-28%) when compared with placebo (-12%, +13%, respectively). A greater percentage of GBP-treated patients exhibited improvement according to investigator and parent/guardian global assessments, with a statistically significant difference observed in the parent/guardian global assessment of seizure-frequency reduction (p = 0.046). Three GBP patients and one placebo patient were seizure free during the double-blind treatment period. GBP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: GBP was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for partial seizures in paediatric patients with previously drug-resistant seizures.