Pharmacokinetics of oral tonapofylline and its acyl-glucuronide metabolite in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline. Patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were enrolled in parallel with demographically matched healthy subjects. All study participants received a single 75-mg oral tonapofylline capsule. The pharmacokinetic parameters for both tonapofylline and its active metabolite, acyl-glucuronide (tonapofylline-AG), were affected by hepatic impairment significantly (P < .1) except for time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)), terminal half-life (t(?)), and apparent volume of distribution based on the terminal phase (Vdz/F). In the mild group, peak plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 to 48 hours postdose (AUC(48 h)), and from time 0 to infinity (AU(Cinf)) of tonapofylline modestly increased as compared with the control healthy subjects (GMR 1.62, 1.57, and 1.53, respectively). The extent of increase of these parameters for tonapofylline-AG was more profound than tonapofylline with geometric mean ratio (GMR) ranging from 2.02 to 2.08. Moderate hepatic impairment was also associated with modest increases of C(max), AUC(48 h), and AUC(inf) of tonapofylline (GMR 1.41, 1.98, and 2.08, respectively). Similar to the mild group, the increase of these parameters were higher for tonapofylline-AG with GMR ranging from 2.80 to 3.86. Single oral 75-mg tonapofylline was safe and well tolerated in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cinacalcet in hepatic impairment : phase I, open-label, parallel-group, single-dose, single-centre study

BACKGROUND and objective: The calcimimetic cinacalcet lowers blood para-thyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphorus levels and calcium-phosphorus product in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis. Cinacalcet is metabolized primarily through oxidative and conjugative pathways. Hepatic disease has the potential to alter cinacalcet metabolism. Thus, it is important to establish the potential for altered cinacalcet metabolism according to the level of hepatic function. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cinacalcet in subjects with different degrees of hepatic function. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group, single-centre study that included 24 subjects (six with normal hepatic function and six each with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment according to Child-Pugh criteria). Subjects were given a single 50 mg oral dose of cinacalcet. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic (pre-dose and up to 120 hours post-dose) and pharmacodynamic (pre-dose and up to 72 hours post-dose) evaluations. Plasma concentrations of cinacalcet were determined using a validated normal phase turbo ion spray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry assay. Serum ionized calcium levels were determined by standard biochemical measures, and PTH levels were determined using an immunometric intact PTH (iPTH) assay. The primary endpoints of the study were area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to time t (AUC(t)), AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC(infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). Other pharmacokinetic parameters (time to C(max) [t(max)], terminal half-life [t((1/2))(beta)], total body clearance [CL/F] and protein binding) and the effect of cinacalcet on plasma PTH and serum calcium were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Total cinacalcet exposure (AUC(infinity)) was comparable in subjects with normal hepatic function and mild hepatic impairment. In subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, mean AUC(infinity) was 2.4- and 4.2-fold higher, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Cinacalcet t((1/2))(beta) was 1.3- and 1.7-fold longer in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean C(max) and t(max), as well as protein binding, were similar in all groups. Consistent with the increase in cinacalcet exposure, decreases in iPTH tended to be greater and prolonged in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment. In this study, cinacalcet was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that cinacalcet can be used without dose adjustment in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, increased drug exposure observed in subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment indicates that iPTH and serum calcium levels should be monitored closely and physicians should be more cautious about dose titration in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.     

Fingolimod (FTY720) in severe hepatic impairment: pharmacokinetics and relationship to markers of liver function

The authors assessed the impact of severe hepatic impairment on the disposition of fingolimod--a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor immunomodulator primarily metabolized by CYP4F2--in 6 patients and 6 matched healthy controls who received a single 5-mg oral dose. Compared with healthy controls, severe hepatic-impaired subjects had a doubled area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and 50% prolonged elimination half-life but a similar peak blood concentration. When these data were combined with those from a previous study in mild and moderate hepatic-impaired subjects, there were significant positive correlations between fingolimod AUC versus bilirubin (r = 0.683) and prothrombin time (r = 0.777) and a significant negative correlation versus albumin (r = 0.578), confirming the importance of liver function for fingolimod clearance. For patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), a standard first dose of fingolimod could be given followed by a maintenance dose that is reduced by half from the normal maintenance dose.     

Effect of carisbamate on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy participants

Carisbamate's effect (200 mg twice-daily [study 1], 600 mg twice-daily [study 2]) on warfarin's (25 mg single dose) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (international normalized ratio) was assessed during 2 open-label studies in healthy participants. Coadministration of either carisbamate regimen produced small changes on the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the last measurable time point (AUC(last)) of (S)- and (R)-warfarin, which are unlikely to be clinically significant. For (S)-warfarin, the ratios (with carisbamate/without carisbamate) of geometric means for C(max) were 105.44 (study 1) and 98.48 (study 2) and for AUC(last) were 109.33 (study 1) and 114.43 (study 2); the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125%. Results were similar for (R)-warfarin. Carisbamate at 600 mg (but not 200 mg) twice-daily prolonged the elimination half-life of (S)- and (R)-warfarin by ~10 hours (25% and 32% increase, respectively). Prothrombin time was unaltered by either carisbamate dose. Adverse events with the highest incidence were dizziness (50%) and headache (50%) in study 1 and somnolence (56%) in study 2. Warfarin exposure and international normalized ratio were unaffected by coadministration of carisbamate 200 mg or 600 mg twice-daily. Carisbamate was well tolerated.     

A single-dose pharmacokinetic study of lasofoxifene in healthy volunteers and subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment

Lasofoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator for osteoporosis management, is metabolized primarily by hepatic oxidation and conjugation. This study compared the pharmacokinetics of 0.25 mg lasofoxifene in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh grade A, n = 6) or moderate (Child-Pugh grade B, n = 6) hepatic impairment and healthy volunteers (n = 6). Analysis of variance was used to calculate 90% confidence intervals for the ratios (impaired/healthy) of least squares mean log maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) values. Lasofoxifene pharmacokinetics was similar between healthy and mild hepatic impairment subjects: ratios of C(max) and AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC([0-infinity])) were 101% (75.0-138) and 95.5% (77.9-117), respectively. In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, ratios of C(max) and AUC([0-infinity]) were 121% (89.6-165) and 138% (112-169), respectively; mean terminal half-life was 252 hr compared to 193 hr in healthy subjects. Dose adjustment should not be required for subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment.     

Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus (rapamycin) in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment

Eighteen adult subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment and 18 healthy control subjects were given a single 15-mg dose of sirolimus by oral solution. Mean whole-blood sirolimus weight-normalized oral-dose clearances (CL/F) were significantly decreased (P = .02) in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment by -31.8% and -36.0%, respectively, compared with controls. There were no significant differences in mean sirolimus C(max) and t(max) values among groups. The observed decreases in CL/F may be relevant in renal transplant patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment, based on the close similarity of sirolimus CL/F in controls and previously studied stable renal transplant patients receiving multiple-dose administration of sirolimus and cyclosporine. There was considerable overlap in the CL/F values of hepatic-impaired subjects and controls, suggesting that whole-blood sirolimus trough concentrations in renal transplant patients exhibiting mild to moderate hepatic impairment be initially monitored to assess the need for dose adjustments.     

The effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of valdecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor

Purpose This study evaluated the effects of varying degrees of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of valdecoxib following single and multiple dosing.Methods This was an open-label, randomised, parallel group study in 12 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A) and in 13 with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B) matched for age, weight, sex, and smoking status; there were two control groups of 12 healthy volunteers, one for each study group. All subjects received a single dose of valdecoxib 20 mg on day 1 and valdecoxib 20 mg twice daily on days 4–7, followed by a single morning dose on day 8. Plasma concentrations of free (unbound) and total valdecoxib and its active hydroxylated metabolite (SC-66905) were measured following single and multiple dosing (day 1 and day 8). Additionally, all subjects received a single intravenous dose of lidocaine 60 mg during the pretreatment period to determine plasma concentrations of monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) as a marker of hepatic CYP3A4 activity.Results The mean apparent oral clearance of free valdecoxib in plasma at steady state decreased by 22–25% in those with mild to moderate impairment (corresponding to a 28–33% increase in the AUC of free valdecoxib and a 19–23% decrease in the AUC of total SC-66905). The mean free fraction of valdecoxib in plasma increased by 9–38%, resulting in a mean decrease in apparent oral clearance of total valdecoxib in plasma of 0–15% (corresponding to a 0–17% increase in the AUC of total valdecoxib). Individual AUCs for free valdecoxib and total SC-66905 did not correlate well with AUCs for MEGX, indicating that decreases in intrinsic clearance of valdecoxib in those with hepatic impairment could not solely be explained by decreased CYP3A4 expression in hepatic impairment.Conclusions In our small study sample, mild and moderate hepatic impairment appeared to have only a modest effect on valdecoxib and SC-66905 pharmacokinetics. The adjustment of valdecoxib dose or dosing regimen does not appear mandatory in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, although caution is necessary during treatment of these patients with valdecoxib.     

Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected subjects with hepatic impairment

The effect of hepatic impairment on lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was investigated. Twenty-four HIV-1-infected subjects received lopinavir 400 mg/ritonavir 100 mg twice daily prior to and during the study: 6 each with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (and hepatitis C virus coinfected) and 12 with normal hepatic function. Mild and moderate hepatic impairment showed similar effects on lopinavir pharmacokinetics. When the 2 hepatic impairment groups were combined, lopinavir Cmax and AUC12 were increased 20% to 30% compared to the controls. Hepatic impairment increased unbound lopinavir AUC12 by 68% and Cmax by 56%. The effect of hepatic impairment on low-dose ritonavir pharmacokinetics was more pronounced in the moderate impairment group (181% and 221% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively) than in the mild impairment group (39% and 61% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively). While lopinavir/ritonavir dose reduction is not recommended in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, caution should be exercised in this population.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin in subjects with hepatic impairment

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of chronic hepatic impairment on rosuvastatin disposition, pharmacodynamic activity and tolerability. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomised, parallel-group trial. Six subjects were enrolled in each of three hepatic-function strata: Child-Pugh class A (CP-A, mild impairment), Child-Pugh class B (CP-B, moderate impairment) and normal hepatic function; the latter two strata were age, weight, race, sex and smoking history matched. All subjects were given rosuvastatin 10 mg for 14 days. RESULTS: In subjects with CP-A, and in four of six subjects with CP-B, rosuvastatin steady-state AUC(0-24) and C(max) were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function (geometric mean values 60.7 ng h/ml and 6.02 ng/ml, respectively). Two of six subjects with CP-B who had the highest CP scores (i.e. the highest degrees of hepatic impairment) had the highest AUC(0-24) (128 ng h/ml and 242 ng h/ml) and C(max) (23.4 ng/ml and 96.7 ng/ml) values. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was decreased in all strata, but the response was more variable in the CP-B group. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated, and the safety profile was similar in subjects with hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. CONCLUSION: In most subjects with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function (more extensive hepatic impairment may increase systemic exposure to rosuvastatin), and most had LDL-C reductions similar to subjects with normal hepatic function.     

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pasireotide (SOM230): results from a multicenter phase I study

Pasireotide is a novel, multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue with high affinity for sst(1,2,3) and sst(5) under clinical evaluation in tumors of neuroendocrine origin, including Cushing's disease, acromegaly, and neuroendocrine tumors. In this phase I, open-label, multicenter study, the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of pasireotide 600 μg were evaluated in adults with normal hepatic function (n = 15) and mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 7), or severe hepatic impairment (n = 6). Following a single dose of pasireotide SC 600 μg, there were no significant differences in the plasma exposure of pasireotide between participants with normal hepatic function or mild hepatic impairment. Subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment showed an increase in AUC(∞) by 56% and 42%, respectively; this increase was 60% and 79% respectively, after adjusting for differences in age, BMI, and baseline serum albumin level between treatment groups. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across cohorts, with no clinically relevant differences in type or frequency of adverse events between cohorts. In conclusion, a single dose of pasireotide SC 600 μg was well tolerated in subjects with hepatic impairment. Drug exposure in subjects with mild hepatic impairment was similar to that seen in healthy volunteers, whereas subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment experienced higher exposure to pasireotide. Adjustment of the pasireotide dose may be required for patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.     

Pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency

This study investigated the effect of varying degrees of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone. Subjects were stratified by estimated creatinine clearance: normal (> 80 mL/min; n = 12), mild renal insufficiency (60-80 mL/min; n = 15), moderate renal insufficiency (30-59 mL/min; n = 18), and severe renal insufficiency not requiring dialysis (< or = 29 mL/min; n = 12). Plasma rosiglitazone concentrations and protein binding were determined after a single oral 8-mg dose of rosiglitazone. Total and unbound pharmacokinetic parameters were generated using noncompartmental methods. AUC, Cmax, and t1/2 data were analyzed separately by ANOVA to provide point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone was not markedly affected by mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency. Slight increases (approximately 10%-20%) in mean unbound AUC0-infinity values were observed for each insufficiency group compared to the normal group but were not considered to be clinically relevant. Patients with severe insufficiency exhibited a 38% increase in mean fraction unbound, leading to an increase in total clearance, which resulted in a 19% to 24% lower mean total AUC0-infinity and Cmax values relative to the normal group. The rates of mild or moderate adverse events were similar for all groups; there were no severe adverse events. Impaired renal function does not markedly alter the pharmacokinetics of total or unbound rosiglitazone following a single dose of rosiglitazone. Therefore, the starting dose of rosiglitazone does not need to be adjusted in patients with renal impairment. Subsequent dose adjustments should be based on individual patient response.     

Effect of hepatic impairment on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ranolazine sustained-release tablets

The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a sustained-release formulation of ranolazine and 3 major metabolites was investigated in an open-label, parallel-group study. Ranolazine (875-mg loading dose followed by 500 mg every 12 hours for a total of 4 maintenance doses) was administered to subjects with mild (n = 8) or moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment and a matched control group of healthy volunteers (n = 16). Moderate, but not mild, hepatic impairment significantly increased ranolazine steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12) by 76% (P < .001) and maximum plasma concentration C(max) by 51% (P < .01). The AUC0-12 ratio (metabolite/ranolazine) decreased for all metabolites in parallel with the degree of hepatic impairment. AUC0-infinity for the CYP3A substrate midazolam administered as a single dose was significantly correlated with ranolazine AUC0-12 at steady state (r2 = .33, P < .001). Over the time interval studied, ranolazine was well tolerated in healthy subjects and hepatically impaired subjects.     

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of ticagrelor in volunteers with mild hepatic impairment

Ticagrelor, a P2Y?? receptor antagonist that inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IPA), has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared with clopidogrel. Because ticagrelor undergoes extensive hepatic elimination, this study evaluated the effect of mild hepatic impairment on its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety. A single oral 90-mg ticagrelor dose was administered to volunteers with and without hepatic impairment (10 with Child-Pugh class A; 10 with normal liver function). Absorption of ticagrelor and formation of its active metabolite, AR-C124910XX, were rapid in both groups. Ticagrelor exposure was higher in hepatically impaired volunteers (maximum concentration [C(max)] 12%; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC] 23%) compared with controls. AR-C124910XX exposure was also higher in hepatic impairment (C(max) 17%; AUC 66%). Ticagrelor is highly protein bound (>99.8%); the unbound fraction in plasma was comparable in volunteers with hepatic impairment and controls. Overall, IPA parameters were not significantly different between groups, and similar IPA-concentration profiles were observed. Ticagrelor was well tolerated in both groups, and no adverse events were reported. In conclusion, mild hepatic impairment resulted in modestly higher exposure to ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, without subsequent effects on pharmacodynamics or tolerability. Based on these data, no ticagrelor dosage adjustment is needed in patients with mild hepatic impairment.     

The effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase

To assess the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of febuxostat at steady state, multiple once-daily 80-mg oral doses of febuxostat were administered to subjects with normal hepatic function and to subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. There were no statistically significant differences in the plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for unbound febuxostat and its active metabolites between subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and those with normal hepatic function. The percentage decrease in serum uric acid appeared to be lower in hepatic impairment groups (49% [mild] and 48% [moderate]) as compared to the normal hepatic group (62%). This lower percentage decrease was minimal and not considered clinically significant. Febuxostat 80 mg once daily appears to be generally safe and well tolerated in mildly and moderately impaired hepatic function groups, and dose adjustment is not required in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment.     

The effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of fosfluconazole and fluconazole following a single intravenous bolus injection of fosfluconazole

AIMS: Fosfluconazole is a phosphate pro-drug of fluconazole (FLCZ). This study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of fosfluconazole and FLCZ following a single intravenous injection of fosfluconazole in subjects with hepatic impairment and to compare them with healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects (12 with normal hepatic function and 12 with chronic stable mild to moderate impaired hepatic function) received a single 1000-mg bolus intravenous injection of fosfluconazole. Concentrations of fosfluconazole and FLCZ were determined in plasma and urine samples taken up to 192 h and 48 h postdose, respectively. RESULTS: The total clearance of fosfluconazole was higher and the t(1/2,Z) and mean residence time were shorter in hepatically impaired subjects than in normal subjects. This may reflect more rapid conversion to FLCZ. The degree of protein binding of fosfluconazole (> 90%) and the amount of fosfluconazole excreted in the urine were similar in both groups. Slightly higher mean plasma concentrations of FLCZ were observed in the impaired group than in the normal group; however, hepatic impairment had no statistically significant effect on the FLCZ pharmacokinetic parameters apart from t(max). The t(max) values were 4.8 h and 3.1 h in the normal and impaired subjects, respectively. The shorter t(max) for FLCZ is also consistent with the more rapid conversion in the impaired subjects. The ratios (95% confidence intervals) for C(max) and AUC of FLCZ (impaired/normal) were 106.0% (92.8, 121.2) and 115.6% (86.4, 154.7), respectively. There were no serious adverse events, and no discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory test abnormalities. The adverse events reported were mostly mild in severity and no trend could be discerned between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfluconazole was more rapidly converted to FLCZ in the hepatically impaired subjects but the FLCZ pharmacokinetic parameters (except t(max)) were not statistically significantly affected by hepatic impairment. Fosfluconazole was well tolerated by both groups. These results suggest that there is no requirement to adjust the dose of fosfluconazole when administered to subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment.     

The pharmacokinetics of escitalopram in patients with hepatic impairment

The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram was determined by means of nonlinear mixed effect modeling, considering both the Child-Pugh classification (and its components) and cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) activity. Twenty-four subjects were grouped according to their Child-Pugh score as healthy, with mild hepatic impairment or with moderate hepatic impairment. The subjects were administered a single oral dose of escitalopram 20 mg, and blood was sampled up to 168 hours after dosage. The serum concentration of escitalopram was determined and the pharmacokinetics assessed by nonlinear mixed effect modeling. The CYP2C19 activity was measured from the urinary excretion ratio of S/R-mephenytoin. All subjects tolerated the treatment well, and no serious adverse events were reported. Predicted mean area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC(inf)) values were 51% and 69% higher for patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh classification), respectively, compared with healthy subjects. The best-fitting model showed an influence of CYP2C19 activity on clearance and body weight on the volume of distribution for escitalopram. CYP2C19 activity is a better predictor of escitalopram clearance than is Child-Pugh classification.     

Pharmacokinetics of linagliptin in subjects with hepatic impairment

AIM

To investigate whether hepatic impairment affects linagliptin pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability.

METHOD

This open label, parallel group, single centre study enrolled patients with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 9) or severe (n = 8) hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (n = 8). Groups were matched with regard to age, weight and gender. Primary endpoints were linagliptin exposure following 5 mg linagliptin once daily for 7 days in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. healthy subjects or after a single 5 mg dose for patients with severe hepatic impairment vs. healthy subjects.

RESULTS

In mild hepatic impairment, steady-state linagliptin exposure was slightly lower than in healthy subjects [AUC_τ,ss geometric mean ratio (GMR) 75.5%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61.6%, 92.5%, and C_max,ss GMR 64.4%, 90% CI 43.2%, 96.0%]. Exposure also tended to be lower in moderate hepatic impairment (AUC_τ,ss GMR 85.5%, 90% CI 70.2%, 104.2% and C_max,ss GMR 92.3%, 90% CI 62.8%, 135.6%). After a single dose, AUC(0,24 h) in patients with severe hepatic impairment was similar to that in healthy subjects (GMR 100.4%, 90% CI 75.0%, 134.3%) and C_max was lower (GMR 77.0%, 90% CI 44.9%, 132.3%). Accumulation based on AUC or C_max and renal excretion of unchanged linagliptin (≤7%) were comparable across groups. Median plasma DPP-4 inhibition was similar in healthy subjects (91%), and patients with mild (90%) and moderate (89%) hepatic impairment at steady-state trough concentrations, and in patients with severe hepatic impairment 24 h after a single dose (84%). Linagliptin was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment did not result in an increase in linagliptin exposure after single and multiple dosing compared with normal hepatic function. Dose adjustment with linagliptin is not required in patients with hepatic impairment.     

Single- and multiple-dose administration of caspofungin in patients with hepatic insufficiency: implications for safety and dosing recommendations

This report investigated safety and dosing recommendations of intravenous caspofungin in hepatic insufficiency. In the single-dose study, 8 patients each with mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency received 70 mg of caspofungin. In the multiple-dose study, 8 patients with mild hepatic insufficiency and 13 healthy matched controls received 70 mg on day 1 and 50 mg daily on days 2 through 14. Eight patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency received 70 mg on day 1 and 35 mg daily on days 2 through 14. Caspofungin was generally well tolerated with no discontinuations due to serious or nonserious adverse experiences. The area under the concentration-time profile over the interval of last quantifiable point to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) for mild hepatic insufficiency/historical controls was 1.55 (1.32-1.86) in the single-dose study and for mild hepatic insufficiency/concurrent controls was 1.21 (1.04-1.39) for day 14 area under the concentration-time profile calculated over the interval 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24h)) following multidose. The AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for moderate hepatic insufficiency/historical controls was 1.76 (1.51-2.06) following 70 mg; AUC(0-24h) GMR (90% CI) for moderate hepatic insufficiency/concurrent controls was 1.07 (0.90-1.28) on day 14 after 35 mg daily. No dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with mild hepatic insufficiency. A dosage reduction to 35 mg daily following the 70-mg loading dose is recommended for patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency.     

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in subjects with hepatic impairment

HIV-seronegative subjects with hepatic impairment (6 mild, 6 moderate) and 12 matched healthy controls received nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours with food for 2 weeks. Mild impairment did not significantly change nelfinavir or major metabolite (M8) steady-state exposures compared with controls. In subjects with moderate impairment, steady-state area under the plasma concentration time-curve over the dosing interval and maximum observed plasma concentrations were 62% and 22% higher for nelfinavir than for controls, and for M8 were 46% and 35% of control values. With increasing degree of impairment, no trend toward increase in unbound nelfinavir was observed, but there was an increase in unbound M8 levels. Nelfinavir was safe and well tolerated. One subject with moderate impairment was discontinued because of transient leucopenia. Observed changes are unlikely to affect nelfinavir efficacy or markedly influence safety. Dose reduction of nelfinavir does not appear necessary for subjects with mild/moderate impairment. Further long-term evaluations of nelfinavir pharmacokinetics and safety in HIV-seropositive subjects with hepatic impairment may be useful.     

The effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of edivoxetine, a selective norepinephrine transporter reuptake inhibitor

Purpose

To assess the impact of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of edivoxetine.

Methods

Two separate multi-center, open-label studies with males and females were conducted. Subjects were categorized according to their hepatic function, determined by the Child–Pugh classification, or renal function, determined by creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft–Gault equation. Subjects received a single dose of 18 mg in the hepatic impairment study or 6 mg in the renal impairment study. Noncompartmental PK parameters were computed from the edivoxetine plasma concentration–time data.

Results

In the hepatic study, the geometric least squares mean (GLSM) and 90 % confidence interval (CI) of the ratio [impaired : normal] of area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞; h?×?ng/mL) was 1.24 (0.93, 1.64) in the mild, 1.60 (1.21, 2.12) in the moderate, and 1.70 (1.28, 2.24) in the severe group. In the renal impairment study, the GLSM (90 % CI) of the ratio [impaired : normal] of AUC0-∞ was 1.13 (0.73, 1.73) in mild, 1.90 (1.28, 2.82) in moderate, 1.55 (0.94, 2.55) in severe, and 1.03 (0.66, 1.59) in ESRD groups. Overall, the GLSM of the ratio [impaired : normal] of C_max was slightly less than or approximately 1 across the hepatic and renal impairment groups. Across both studies, there were no clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory values, the adverse events were mild in severity and mostly related to nervous system and gastrointestinal disorder-related events.

Conclusions

PK changes in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment were of small magnitude and did not appear to impact overall subject tolerability. Daily dosing of edivoxetine in a larger population of impaired subjects, including those with dual impairment, would aid in establishing edivoxetine tolerability and PK in a clinical practice scenario.