Lsh controls Hox gene silencing during development

Polycomb-mediated repression and DNA methylation are important epigenetic mechanisms of gene silencing. Recent evidence suggests a functional link between the polycomb repressive complex (PRC) and Dnmts in cancer cells. Here we provide evidence that Lsh, a regulator of DNA methylation, is also involved in normal control of PRC-mediated silencing during embryogenesis. We demonstrate that Lsh, a SNF2 homolog, can associate with some Hox genes and regulates Dnmt3b binding, DNA methylation, and silencing of Hox genes during development. Moreover, Lsh can associate with PRC1 components and influence PRC-mediated histone modifications. Thus Lsh is part of a physiological feedback loop that reinforces DNA methylation and silencing of PRC targets.     

DNA methylation in gastric cancer,related to Helicobacter pylori and Epstein-Barr virus

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide,and significant effort has been focused on clarifying the pathology of gastric cancer.In particular,the development of genome-wide analysis tools has enabled the detection of genetic and epigenetic alterations in gastric cancer;for example,aberrant DNA methylation in gene promoter regions is thought to play a crucial role in gastric carcinogenesis.The etiological viewpoint is also essential for the study of gastric cancers,and two distinct pathogens,Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)and Epstein-Barr virus(EBV),are known to participate in gastric carcinogenesis.Chronic inflammation of the gastric epithelium due to H.pylori infection induces aberrant polyclonal methylation that may lead to an increased risk of gastric cancer.In addition,EBV infection is known to cause extensive methylation,and EBV-positive gastric cancers display a high methylation epigenotype,in which aberrant methylation extends to not only Polycomb repressive complex(PRC)-target genes in embryonic stem cells but also non-PRC-target genes.Here,we review aberrant DNA methylation in gastric cancer and the association between methylation and infection with H.pylori and EBV.     

Epigenetics, genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology

Epigenetic mechanisms play a key role in regulating gene expression. One hallmark of these modifications is DNA methylation at cytosine residues of CpG dinucleotides in gene promoters, transposons and imprinting control regions. Genomic imprinting refers to an epigenetic marking of genes that results in monoallelic expression depending on their parental origin. There are two critical time periods in epigenetic reprogramming: gametogenesis and early preimplantation development. Major reprogramming takes place in primordial germ cells in which parental imprints are erased and totipotency is restored [1]. Imprint marks are then and re-established during spermatogenesis or oogenesis, depending on sex [1], [2] and [3]. Upon fertilization, genome-wide demethylation occurs followed by a wave of de novo methylation, both of which are resisted by imprinted loci [4]. Epigenetic patterns are usually faithfully maintained during development. However, this maintenance sometimes fails, resulting in the disturbance of epigenetic patterns and human disorders. For example, two fetal growth disorders, the Beckwith-Wiedemann (BWS) and the Silver-Russell (SRS) syndromes with opposite phenotypes, are caused by abnormal DNA methylation at the 11p15 imprinted locus [5], [6] and [7]: respectively loss of methylation at the Imprinting Region Center (ICR2) or gain of methylation at ICR1 in BWS and loss of methylation at ICR1 in SRS. Early embryogenesis is a critical time for epigenetic regulation, and this process is sensitive to environmental factors. The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been shown to induce epigenetic alterations and to affect fetal growth and development [8], [9], [10] and [11]. In humans, several imprinting disorders, including BWS, occur at significantly higher frequencies in children conceived with the use of ART than in children conceived spontaneously [12] and [13]. The cause of these epigenetic imprinting disorders (following ART, unfertility causes, hormonal hyperstimulation, in vitro fertilization-IVF, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection-ICSI, micro-manipulation of gametes, exposure to culture medium, in vitro ovocyte maturation, time of transfer) remains unclear. However, recent data have shown that in patients with BWS or SRS, including those born following the use of ART, the DNA methylation defect involves imprinted loci other than 11p15 [14] and [15] (11p15 region: CTCF binding sites at ICR1, H19 and IGF2 DMRs, KCNQ1OT1 [ICR2], SNRPN [chromosome 15 q11-13], PEG/MEST1 [chromosome 7q31], IGF type2 receptor and ZAC1 [chromosome 6q26 et 6q24 respectively], DLK1/GTL2-IG-DMR [chromosome 14q32] and GNAS locus [chromosome 20q13.3]). This suggests that unfaithful maintenance of DNA methylation marks following fertilization involves the dysregulation of a trans-acting regulatory factor that could be altered by ART.     

Neonatal exposure to estradiol/bisphenol A alters promoter methylation and expression of Nsbp1 and Hpcal1 genes and transcriptional programs of Dnmt3a/b and Mbd2/4 in the rat prostate gland throughout life

Evidence supporting an early origin of prostate cancer is growing. We demonstrated previously that brief exposure of neonatal rats to estradiol or bisphenol A elevated their risk of developing precancerous lesions in the prostate upon androgen-supported treatment with estradiol as adults. Epigenetic reprogramming may be a mechanism underlying this inductive event in early life, because we observed overexpression of phosphodiesterase 4D variant 4 (Pde4d4) through induction of hypomethylation of its promoter. This epigenetic mark was invisible in early life (postnatal d 10), becoming apparent only after sexual maturation. Here, we asked whether other estrogen-reprogrammable epigenetic marks have similar or different patterns in gene methylation changes throughout life. We found that hypomethylation of the promoter of nucleosome binding protein-1 (Nsbp1), unlike Pde4d4, is an early and permanent epigenetic mark of neonatal exposure to estradiol/bisphenol A that persists throughout life, unaffected by events during adulthood. In contrast, hippocalcin-like 1 (Hpcal1) is a highly plastic epigenetic mark whose hypermethylation depends on both type of early-life exposure and adult-life events. Four of the eight genes involved in DNA methylation/demethylation showed early and persistent overexpression that was not a function of DNA methylation at their promoters, including genes encoding de novo DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt3a/b) and methyl-CpG binding domain proteins (Mbd2/4) that have demethylating activities. Their lifelong aberrant expression implicates them in early-life reprogramming and prostate carcinogenesis during adulthood. We speculate that the distinctly different fate of early-life epigenetic marks during adulthood reflects the complex nature of lifelong editing of early-life epigenetic reprogramming.     

Active tissue-specific DNA demethylation conferred by somatic cell nuclei in stable heterokaryons

DNA methylation is among the most stable epigenetic marks, ensuring tissue-specific gene expression in a heritable manner throughout development. Here we report that differentiated mesodermal somatic cells can confer tissue-specific changes in DNA methylation on epidermal progenitor cells after fusion in stable multinucleate heterokaryons. Myogenic factors alter regulatory regions of genes in keratinocyte cell nuclei, demethylating and activating a muscle-specific gene and methylating and silencing a keratinocyte-specific gene. Because these changes occur in the absence of DNA replication or cell division, they are mediated by an active mechanism. Thus, the capacity to transfer epigenetic changes to other nuclei is not limited to embryonic stem cells and oocytes but is also a property of highly specialized mammalian somatic cells. These results suggest the possibility of directing the reprogramming of readily available postnatal human progenitor cells toward specific tissue cell types.     

Deregulation of Epigenetic Mechanisms by the Hepatitis B Virus X Protein in Hepatocarcinogenesis

This review focuses on the significance of deregulation of epigenetic mechanisms by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein in hepatocarcinogenesis and HBV replication. Epigenetic mechanisms, DNA methylation, and specific histone modifications, e.g., trimethylation of H3 on lysine-27 or lysine-4, maintain ‘cellular memory’ by silencing expression of lineage-inducing factors in stem cells and conversely, of pluripotency factors in differentiated cells. The X protein has been reported to induce expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), likely promoting epigenetic changes during hepatocarcinogenesis. Furthermore, in cellular and animal models of X-mediated oncogenic transformation, protein levels of chromatin modifying proteins Suz12 and Znf198 are down-regulated. Suz12 is essential for the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mediating the repressive trimethylation of H3 on lysine-27 (H3K27me3). Znf198, stabilizes the LSD1-CoREST-HDAC complex that removes, via lysine demethylase1 (LSD1), the activating trimethylation of H3 on lysine-4 (H3K4me3). Down-regulation of Suz12 also occurs in liver tumors of woodchucks chronically infected by woodchuck hepatitis virus, an animal model recapitulating HBV-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis in humans. Significantly, subgroups of HBV-induced liver cancer re-express hepatoblast and fetal markers, and imprinted genes, suggesting hepatocyte reprogramming during oncogenic transformation. Lastly, down-regulation of Suz12 and Znf198 enhances HBV replication. Collectively, these observations suggest deregulation of epigenetic mechanisms by HBV X protein influences both the viral cycle and the host cell.     

Polycomb genes and cancer: time for clinical application?

Polycomb group genes (PcGs) are epigenetic effectors, essential for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Two main Polycomb repressive complexes (PRC1, PRC2) mediate gene silencing through histone post-translational modifications. PcGs have been the focus of investigation in cancer research. Many cancer types show an over-expression of PcGs, predicting poor prognosis, metastasis and chemoresistance. Genetic polymorphisms of EZH2 (a PRC2 component) are significantly associated to lung cancer risk. Recently, 3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNeP) was identified as an efficient inhibitor of PRC2 activity. DZNeP impairs cancer stem cell self-renewal and tumorigenicity. Despite the well-established role of PcGs in cancer stem cell biology, few studies dissected the clinical significance of these genes. In this paper, we explore PcGs as predictive and prognostic factors in oncology, with particular emphasis on what they can add to current biomarkers. We also propose a model for the rational development of DZNeP-based anticancer regimens and suggest the therapeutic applications of this drug.