Effects of single doses of alprazolam and diazepam,alone and in combination with ethanol,on psychomotor and cognitive performance and on autonomic nervous system reactivity in healthy volunteers

Summary Effects of alprazolam, alone and in combination with ethanol, on psychomotor and cognitive performance were studied in healthy male volunteers and compared to effects of diazepam. Alprazolam 2 mg produced relatively long-lasting impairments on tests of tracking, verbal and nonverbal information processing, and memory, and decreased blood pressure without a change in heart rate or plasma norepinephrine levels. Although ethanol consumption was demonstrated to produce additive decrements in performance on certain tasks, there was little evidence to support a synergistic effect. Alprazolam 2 mg was accompanied by increased selfreports of side effects, especially drowsiness. Low dose alprazolam, diazepam, and ethanol produced significantly fewer side effects than 2 mg alprazolam, but significantly more than placebo.     

Caffeine reversal of ethanol effects on the multiple sleep latency test, memory, and psychomotor performance.

Caffeine has been shown to reverse some of the performance-impairing effects of ethanol. However, it is not known whether this antagonistic effect of caffeine is mediated by a reduction in sleepiness. The present study assessed physiological alertness/sleepiness, memory, and psychomotor performance following the administration of placebo, ethanol, and caffeine+ethanol combinations. A total of 13 healthy individuals (21-35 years old) underwent four conditions presented in a Latin Square Design: placebo-placebo, ethanol (0.5 g/kg)-placebo, ethanol (0.5 g/kg)-caffeine 150 mg, and ethanol (0.5 g/kg)-caffeine 300-mg. The Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), psychomotor performance battery, memory test, and mood/sleepiness questionnaires were administered following each condition. The peak breadth ethanol concentration (BrEC) was 0.043+/-0.0197% and did not differ among the three caffeine treatments. As expected, ethanol reduced mean latency on the MSLT. The lowest caffeine dose reversed this effect and the highest dose increased mean latency (greater alertness) significantly beyond placebo levels. Ethanol also impaired psychomotor performance and memory. The 300-mg caffeine dose restored performance and memory measures to placebo levels. Although visual analog ratings of dizziness were increased by ethanol, they were not diminished by either caffeine dose. In conclusion, Low-dose caffeine prevented the sleepiness and performance impairment associated with a moderate dose of ethanol. Thus, caffeine, similar to other stimulants, can reverse the physiologically sedating effects of ethanol, although other negative effects remain.     

Dissociable effects of a single dose of ecstasy (MDMA) on psychomotor skills and attentional performance

Ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA) is a psychoactive recreational drug widely used by young people visiting dance parties, and has been associated with poor cognitive function. The current study assessed the influence of a single dose of MDMA 75 mg and alcohol 0.5 g/kg on cognition, psychomotor performance and driving-related task performance. Twelve healthy recreational ecstasy users participated in an experimental study conducted according to a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled three-way cross-over design. MDMA improved psychomotor performance, such as movement speed and tracking performance in a single task, as well as in a divided attention task. MDMA impaired the ability to predict object movement under divided attention. However, the inability to accurately predict object movement after MDMA may indicate impairment of particular performance skills relevant to driving. There was no effect of MDMA on visual search, planning or retrieval from semantic memory.     

Increased anticholinergic challenge-induced memory impairment associated with the APOE-epsilon4 allele in the elderly: a controlled pilot study.

The degree to which elderly adults experience cognitive impairments from centrally acting anticholinergic drugs is variable, but the cause of this variability is unknown. The present study examined the epsilon4 allele as a possible modulator of the effects of trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (Artane( trade mark )), an anticholinergic drug, on memory functioning. Of the 24 cognitively intact, elderly participants (age range 62-76), 12 who possessed the epsilon4 allele, participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover, three-way study. All participants were tested after receiving a single oral dose of trihexyphenidyl (1 or 2 mg) or placebo, with a 7-day washout period between sessions. Memory and psychomotor tests were administered at baseline, and at 1, 2.5, and 5 h post-treatment. Results showed that participants with the epsilon4 allele demonstrated significant impairments in delayed recall after both 1 and 2 mg doses of trihexyphenidyl while the non-epsilon4 group did not. Additionally, while acute administration of the 2 mg dose significantly impaired total recall in both epsilon4 and non-epsilon4 carriers, the epsilon4 carriers showed a more persistent impairment. These findings held when participants with the epsilon2 allele were excluded from the analyses. The epsilon4 groups did not differ with respect to psychomotor performance or plasma drug levels. These results provide evidence suggesting that the epsilon4 allele plays a significant role in increasing cognitive sensitivity to trihexyphenidyl and that a temporal component of memory consolidation may be especially vulnerable. A larger study is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.     

The effects of single doses of CL 284,846, lorazepam,and placebo on psychomotor and memory function in normal male volunteers

Summary The effects of single doses of CL284,846 (20 mg), lorazepam (2 mg) and placebo on psychomotor performance, memory function and subjective feelings were assessed in 12 normal, healthy male volunteers. Each subject received each treatment in balanced order and a minimum of 6 days was left between treatments.The subjects performance on a comprehensive battery of tests of psychomotor performance, memory function and subjective ratings was assessed pre-treatment and at 1, 3 and 5 h post-treatment.In general, the effects of CL284,846 on memory were similar to those of lorazepam at 1 h post-treatment but, recovery was rapid with CL284,846. Impairments induced by lorazepam persisted throughout the post-drug testing sessions.This pattern of effects was repeated across most of the variables tested. However, at 1 h, CL284,846 produced less marked psychomotor impairment than lorazepam.The results of this study suggest that CL284,846 is a safe, rapid acting and effective sedative with some clear advantages over lorazepam with respect to unwanted cognitive and psychomotor impairments.     

Alprazolam in the elderly: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during multiple dosing

Previous studies have suggested that elderly men eliminate alprazolam more slowly than young adults. This study in the elderly was designed to determine whether a change in pharmacokinetics influences the response to alprazolam during multiple dose regimens. In addition, the study was designed to determine alprazolam pharmacokinetics and the degree to which its hydroxymetabolites accumulate, the degree of psychomotor impairment, and whether tolerance to impairment and sedation develops during three different multiple dose regimens. Twenty-six subjects completed this study. The subjects were randomized into one of three treatment groups: 0.25 mg q8h, 0.5 mg q8h, and 2 mg q12h. Subjects remained in the clinic for 8 days (day — 2-day 5). Day 0 was used as a drug free testing day to establish baseline scores for sedation, digit symbol substitution (DSS), card sorting (CS) tasks, and two computer tests. Subjects received the drug according to schedule on days 1 through 4, with day 5 as the washout day. Blood samples were assayed for alprazolam, alpha-hydroxyalprazolam and 4-hydroxyalprazolam. Alpha-hydroxyalprazolam concentrations were below assay detection limits in all subjects in the 0.25 and 0.5 mg q8h groups and 2.6 ng/ml in the 2 mg q12h group. When detectable, 4-hydroxyalprazolam concentrations were <10% of the corresponding alprazolam concentration. Mean alprazolam oral clearance values in the three treatment groups ranged between 0.54 and 0.62 ml/min/kg and half-lives were in excess of 21 h. Degree of sedation and impairment was dose related. Sedation and impairment was not higher on day 4 despite concentrations 2–3 times as great as on day 1, indicating development of tolerance. Subjects were not, however, back to baseline level of performance on day 4.     

A dose-effect study of repeated administration of buprenorphine/naloxone on performance in opioid-dependent volunteers

Based on its unique pharmacological profile, buprenorphine may produce less impairment in psychomotor and cognitive performance than methadone. However, the few studies that have investigated the performance effects of buprenorphine in opioid-abusing volunteers examined effects of single acute doses rather than effects of repeated dosing and included a very limited range of measures. The present inpatient study evaluated dose-related effects of repeated administration of the buprenorphine/naloxone combination product (8/2, 16/4, 32/8 mg, sublingual tablets) in eight opioid-dependent volunteers on performance of a broad range of tasks, following a period of 7-10 days of dosing at each level, in a double-blind, within-subject, crossover design. The testing battery included measures of psychomotor speed, time perception, conceptual flexibility, focused attention, working memory, long-term/episodic memory, and metamemory. Supporting the hypothesis of limited impairment with buprenorphine, results revealed minimal impairment in performance as buprenorphine/naloxone dose was increased four-fold. The only significant effect of dose was an impairment in episodic/long-term memory (recognition memory) performance at the highest dose (32/8 mg) relative to the two lower doses. Future studies incorporating larger sample sizes and non-drug controls, as well as directly comparing buprenorphine to methadone and LAAM are needed to further test the hypothesis of limited impairment with buprenorphine.     

Cognitive, psychomotor and actual driving performance in healthy volunteers after immediate and extended release formulations of alprazolam 1 mg

Rationale Alprazolam extended-release (XR) is approved for the treatment of panic disorder. This sustained formulation is absorbed in a delayed manner and is therefore expected to produce fewer and less severe side effects than its immediate release equivalent (alprazolam IR). The effect of alprazolam XR on potentially dangerous daily activities, such as driving a car, is expected to be less as compared to alprazolam IR. Objectives The present study was designed to compare the effects of alprazolam XR (1 mg) and alprazolam IR (1 mg) on actual driving ability and cognitive function. Method Eighteen healthy volunteers (aged 20–45 years) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study. At 4 h post-dose, subjects performed a standardized driving test on a primary highway in normal traffic. Cognitive and psychomotor tests were assessed 1, 2.5, and 5.5 h post-dose. Memory functioning was measured only 1 h after administration. Results Both formulations severely impaired driving performance between 4 and 5 h after administration. The magnitude of impairment in the driving test observed with alprazolam XR was about half that observed with alprazolam IR. Laboratory test results were in line with the driving data. Conclusions The acute impairing effects of alprazolam XR 1 mg on driving and psychomotor functions were generally less, as compared to its immediate-release equivalent, but still of sufficient magnitude to increase the risk of becoming involved in traffic accidents.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of the effects of fexofenadine, loratadine and promethazine on cognitive and psychomotor function

AIMS: To assess whether fexofenadine in a range of doses from 80 to 180 mg has any disruptive effects on aspects of psychomotor and cognitive function in comparison with placebo, loratadine and promethazine, an antihistamine known to produce psychomotor and cognitive impairment. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers received fexofenadine 80 mg, 120 mg and 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, promethazine 30 mg (as a positive internal control) and placebo in a six-way crossover, double-blind study. Following each dose, subjects were required to perform a series of tests of cognitive function and psychomotor performance at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h post dose. The test battery included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT) and assessment of subjective sedation (LARS). Overall levels of activity were monitored by means of wrist mounted actigraphs throughout each of the 24 h experimental periods. RESULTS: Fexofenadine at all doses tested was not statistically different from placebo in any of the tests used and loratadine did not cause any significant impairment of cognitive function. Significant impairments were found following promethazine. Promethazine caused a significant reduction in CFF threshold and this effect was evident up to 12 h post dose (P<0.05). There was a significant increase in recognition reaction time at 3 and 6 h post promethazine administration, and the drug caused a significant (P<0. 002) increase in the percentage of 'sleep-like' activity from actigraph records during the daytime. CONCLUSIONS: Fexofenadine at doses up to 180 mg appears free from disruptive effects on aspects of psychomotor and cognitive function in a study where the psychometric assessments have been shown to be sensitive to impairment, as evidenced by the effects of the verum control promethazine 30 mg.     

Alprazolam and lorazepam effects on memory acquisition and retrieval processes

A double-blind study involving healthy young adult males examined acute effects of two benzodiazepines (alprazolam 1 mg and lorazepam 2 mg) on long-term memory acquisition and retrieval, using Buschke's "selective reminding" task and a free recall task. Subjects learned lists consisting of high and low imagery nouns. The assessments, done at baseline and hourly for 4 hours after drug ingestion, also included two psychomotor tests and subjective ratings by subjects. Both benzodiazepines produced marked memory impairment. Contrary to the prevailing view that benzodiazepines primarily impair long-term memory acquisition rather than retrieval, results from Buschke's task indicated impairment of retrieval as well. This finding may be related to the procedures and assumptions of Buschke's task. The benzodiazepine-induced impairments increased over the course of successive trials on the same list. Both drugs decreased the normal superiority in recall of high imagery words relative to low imagery words, impaired psychomotor performance, and increased subjective sedation. Alprazolam and lorazepam produced equally intense impairments. Alprazolam tended to produce earlier impairment and earlier recovery.     

The psychomotor and cognitive effects of a new antihistamine,mizolastine, compared to terfenadine,triprolidine and placebo in healthy volunteers

Eighteen healthy volunteers received mizolastine 5 mg, 15 mg or 45 mg, terfenadine 60 mg, triprolidine 10 mg or placebo in a 6-way crossover, double blind study. Following each dose, subjects performed a series of tests of cognitive function and psychomotor performance at 1, 3, 5, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. The test battery included critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, tracking, Stroop and Sternberg memory tests and assessment of subjective sedation.Sedative effects and a concomitant reduction in psychomotor and cognitive function were observed following triprolidine, terfenadine and the highest dose of mizolastine, 45 mg, e.g. triprolidine reduced CFF threshold by 1.5 Hz and increased reaction time by 50 ms, impairments comparable to those caused by blood alcohol concentrations of 50 mg%, the legal limit in many countries. Mizolastine 5 mg did not differ significantly from placebo and at 15 mg differed only at one test point at one time.It may be concluded that mizolastine (5 mg and 15 mg) is free from disruptive effects on cognitive function and psychomotor performance, in contrast to terfenadine 60 mg, triprolidine 10 mg and mizolastine 45 mg.     

Modafinil improves cognition and attentional set shifting in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Modafinil, a novel cognitive enhancer, selectively improves neuropsychological task performance in healthy volunteers and adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It has been argued that persistent cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia are responsible for the failure of many patients to rehabilitate socially even when psychotic symptoms are in remission. The present study examined the potential of modafinil as a cognitive enhancer in schizophrenia. Twenty chronic patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were entered into a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study using a 200 mg dose of modafinil. Modafinil had some cognitive enhancing properties in schizophrenia similar to those observed in healthy adults and adult patients with ADHD. Improvement was seen on short-term verbal memory span, with trends towards improved visual memory and spatial planning. This was accompanied by slowed response latency on the spatial planning task. No effect on stop-signal performance was seen. Importantly, significant improvement in attentional set shifting was seen, despite no effect of modafinil on this task being seen in healthy volunteers or ADHD patients. Modafinil may have potential as an important therapy for cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia, particularly because of its beneficial effects on attentional set shifting.     

The acute effects of amisulpride (50 mg and 200 mg) and haloperidol (2 mg) on cognitive function in healthy elderly volunteers

In this double-blind, placebo controlled, four-way cross-over trial in 16 healthy elderly volunteers, the acute effects of haloperidol 2 mg, amisulpride 50 mg and 200 mg, were assessed on a range of tests of cognitive function. On each study day, cognitive performance was assessed prior to dosing and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h after dosing with the following tests from the Cognitive Drug Research computerized assessment system: simple reaction time, digit vigilance task, choice reaction time, visual tracking, Critical Flicker Fusion, body sway, numeric working memory, immediate and delayed word recall, word recognition and self-ratings of mood and alertness. Haloperidol showed a general tendency to impair performance, and although this did not reach significance compared to placebo, for two tasks there were significant impairments with haloperidol compared to amisulpride. Amisulpride 50 mg and 200 mg, was not associated with impairment. In fact, there was some suggestion of improvement over placebo on three measures. The timings of assessment were appropriate for the study compounds. Furthermore, in a recent study in which a smaller number of elderly volunteers was tested on the same cognitive assessment system, a clear profile of acute impairments of haloperidol 3 mg, was identified. This indicates that haloperidol 2 mg, is not a sufficient dose to affect cognitive function in the elderly, supporting the general absence of effects with this dose in the young. Thus, the general absence of cognitive impairments with amisulpride at the doses used in this study suggests that this compound does not impair cognitive function in the elderly.     

Comparison of the spectrum of cognitive effects of alprazolam and adinazolam after single doses in healthy subjects

Single doses of alprazolam (0, 0.5, 1.5 mg) or adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablets (SR) (0, 15, 45 mg) were administered to separate groups of 12 healthy men in a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution (DSST), and memory was assessed using a test battery which reflects various aspects of memory, including attention/working memory, explicit memory (recall of categorically related words), semantic memory (fragmented picture recognition, generation of category exemplars), and implicit memory (time saved in resolving fragmented pictures on the second exposure). Maximal psychomotor performance and memory decrements for the highest active doses were significantly different from placebo for all tasks at some time after dosing. The maximum decrement in DSST was not significantly different between drugs at the high dose (P=0.288). Maximum attention/working memory decrements were significantly different between the high doses of the active compounds (P=0.031), and the difference in maximum category recall decrement was marginally significant (P=0.067). Access to knowledge memory was not significantly altered by these drugs; these results are similar to those obtained for other benzodiazepines. Both drugs exhibited slight effects on implicit memory. The results suggest that the sedative and memory effects of these triazolobenzodiazepines may not be closely related and suggest that adinazolam has a somewhat different spectrum of cognitive effects relative to alprazolam.     

Dose-response evaluation of the interaction between sertraline and alprazolam in vivo

In vitro data show the inhibition of alprazolam metabolism by sertraline via CYP3A4; therefore, using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, the authors conducted this study to assess the potential for similar in vivo inhibition in humans. Ten healthy volunteers participated in two test sessions (placebo/alprazolam 1 mg orally) before the initiation of sertraline treatment. Blood samples were obtained over a 32-hour period and pharmacodynamic measures (sedation, psychomotor performance, memory function) were obtained over an 8-hour period. After a minimum of 2 weeks of daily sertraline self-administration (50, 100, or 150 mg/day), test sessions were repeated. Alprazolam concentrations (N = 6, 4, and 6 at sertraline doses of 50, 100, and 150 mg/day, respectively) showed no significant changes based on peak concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), elimination half-life (t1/2[beta]), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-8)), with the exception of a reduced Cmax in the 50 mg/day group. Similarly, dynamic data showed no significant variations based on peak effect, Tmax, and AUC(0-infinity), with the exception of increased peak impairment in one measure of psychomotor performance. No differences were detected between placebo alone and placebo plus sertraline. These findings suggest that sertraline (50-150 mg/day) does not alter the single-dose kinetics or dynamics of alprazolam; therefore, the combination may be prescribed without an increased risk of alprazolam toxicity.     

Pharmacodynamic profile of Zaleplon,a new non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent

The challenge in developing hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia is to balance the sedative effect needed at bedtime with the residual sedation on awakening. Zaleplon is a novel pyrazolopyrimidine hypnotic agent that acts as a selective agonist to the brain omega(1) receptor situated on the alpha(1) subunit of the GABA(A) receptor complex. Zaleplon was proven to be an effective hypnotic drug as it consistently and significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep in insomniac patients for doses of 10 mg and above in polysomnography studies. The pharmacodynamic profile of zaleplon on psychomotor performance, actual driving and cognitive function, including memory, was assessed in several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy young subjects as well as insomniac patients by using various positive controls (zolpidem, zopiclone, triazolam and flurazepam). The recommended hypnotic dose of zaleplon in young adults (10 mg) produced minimal or no impairment of psychomotor and memory performance even when administered during the night as little as 1 h before waking. No impairment of actual driving was observed when zaleplon 10 mg was administered either at bedtime or in the middle of the night as little as 4 h before waking. Zaleplon 20 mg, twice the recommended dose, generally produced significant impairment of performance and cognitive functions when these functions were measured at the time of peak plasma concentration, i.e. 1 h after dose administration, and no impairment of driving abilities was observed 4 h after a middle-of-the-night administration. In contrast, consistent detrimental residual effects on various aspects of psychomotor and cognitive functions were observed with the therapeutic doses of the various commonly prescribed hypnotic agents used as comparators, e.g. zolpidem 10 mg up to 5 h after dose administration, zopiclone 7.5 mg up to 10 h after, flurazepam 30 mg up to 14 h after and triazolam 0.25 mg up to 6 h after. Also, zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg were also shown to significantly impair driving ability the next morning when this was measured 4 h and up to 10 h after dose administration, respectively. The present review shows that zaleplon 10 mg has little or no residual effect when administered in the middle of the night, as late as 1 h before waking, and is devoid of impairment of driving abilities as assessed by actual driving 4 h after dose administration. The lack of clinically significant or minimally statistically significant residual effects of zaleplon even at its peak concentration may be explained by its unique pharmacokinetic (rapid elimination half-life) and pharmacodynamic (low affinity, and specific binding profile to various subunits of the GABA(A)receptor) profiles. These properties allow zaleplon to be used for treatment of symptoms only when they occur, either at bedtime or later in the night, without incurring significant risk of developing next-day impairment of psychomotor and cognitive functioning. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Impairment of cognitive and psychomotor function by ethanol in social drinkers

Ethanol is known to impair cognitive and psychomotor function in high doses. We studied the impairment of cognitive, psychomotor and behavioral responses in controlled environment in a group of healthy young social drinkers at below and above legal limit for presumption of intoxication (100 mg/dl). Attention, concentration, auditory-verbal memory and memory for visuospatial information were significantly impaired at both levels. Motor speed was impaired only at higher levels though fine coordination was impaired at both doses. Females showed more impairment on visual as well as auditory-verbal memory functions. With low doses, choice reaction time improved with the nonpreferred hand.     

Psychomotor,physiological and cognitive effects of scopolamine and ephedrine in healthy man

Summary Three placebo-controlled double-blind studies in healthy volunteers were performed to reveal the psychophysiological effects of scopolamine, ephedrine and their combination. Single intravenous dose of scopolamine 6 µg/kg (scopolamine hydrobromide 7.4 µg/kg) impaired various psychomotor functions both subjectively and objectively. It caused sedation, impairment of coordinative and reactive skills, visual disturbances and impairment of short-term memory. Oral scopolamine hydrobromide in single doses of 0.3 mg and 0.9 mg, or 0.9 mg b.d. for 3 days, had few effects. A slight impairment of short-term memory and a decrease in the flicker fusion threshold were seen. The visual nearpoint and pupil diameter were increased and some subjects reported blurred vision and dizziness during treatment with scopolamine 0.9 mg b.d. Scopolamine showed clear cardiovascular effects in all studies: it decreased heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Ephedrine alone and in combination with scopolamine had no deleterious effects. On the contrary, it antagonized the scopolamine-induced impairment in the flicker fusion test and the decrease in blood pressure and heart rate. In sufficient doses scopolamine impairs various psychomotor and cognitive skills. An oral dose of scopolamine hydrobromide 0.9 mg on average has few effects, although they may be very striking in certain individuals. To avoid unwanted effects and diminition in performance by scopolamine, doses less than 0.9 mg should be used.     

Cognitive performance amongst recreational users of "ecstasy

RATIONALE: Previous work has suggested that memory impairments have been associated with the recreational use of "ecstasy". This previous work, however, has not taken into consideration the additional use of cannabis amongst those examined. Cannabis use has also been associated with memory impairment. There is therefore a clear need to explore the impact of both of these illicit substances upon memory ability. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether recreational use of ecstasy impairs memory and attentional ability and to explore the impact of the concomitant use of cannabis upon these cognitive functions. In addition, an exploration of subjective accounts of cognitive ability was undertaken to determine whether objective impairments were perceived by users in everyday functioning. METHODS: Cognitive functioning was examined in three groups of young people: 15 regular users of ecstasy; 15 regular users of cannabis who had never taken ecstasy and 15 control subjects who had never taken any illicit substances. The Weschler Memory Scale (revised) and a computerised reaction time task were administered on a day when the subjects claimed to be drug free. In addition, subjects completed a biographical questionnaire and the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) in order to assess subjective accounts of cognitive slips. RESULTS: Performance was similar across all three groups for measures of visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, complex reaction time, visual memory and attention and concentration. Significant impairment was found on measures of verbal memory in both cannabis users and ecstasy users. A significant impairment in performance was found on measures of delayed memory for the ecstasy users compared to both the cannabis group and the control group. Despite these findings, no differences in subjective ratings of cognitive failures were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides additional evidence for longterm neuropsychological sequelae associated with the use of ecstasy, particularly with regard to delayed memory ability.