Transitioning from oral risperidone or paliperidone to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate: a real-world analysis among Veterans Health Administration patients with schizophrenia who have had at least one prior hospitalization

Abstract

Objective: To address gaps in the literature on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with schizophrenia and prior hospitalization who transition from oral risperidone or paliperidone (oral ris/pali) to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in a real-world setting by comparing treatment patterns, HRU, and costs 12-months pre- and post-transition to PP1M among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients affected by schizophrenia who have had ≥1 hospitalization.

Methods: VHA patients with schizophrenia (aged ≥18?years) who initiated oral ris/pali, had ≥1 all-cause inpatient stay, and transitioned to PP1M from January 2015–March 2017 were included from the VHA database. The first transition date to PP1M was identified as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous health plan eligibility for 12?months pre- and post-PP1M. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar’s test, as appropriate.

Results: The study included 319 patients (mean [SD] age?=?51.6 [4.2] years) during 12 months of baseline and follow-up. During pre-PP1M transition, 7.2% of the patients were adherent (proportion of days covered [PDC]?≥?80%) to oral ris/pali. Post-PP1M transition, 27.6% of the patients were adherent to PP1M. Comparison of HRU outcomes from the pre- to post-PP1M transition revealed significantly lower all-cause inpatient stays (3.5 vs 1.4, p?<?.0001) and shorter inpatient length of stay (43.4 vs 18.3?days, p?<?.0001). Similar trends were seen for mental health and schizophrenia-related HRU. Cost outcome comparison indicated significantly lower all-cause inpatient costs ($64,702 vs $24,147, p?<?.0001), total medical costs ($87,917 vs $56,947, p?<?.0001), and total costs ($91,181 vs $69,106, p?<?.0001). A similar trend was observed for mental health and schizophrenia-related costs.

Conclusions: Transitioning from oral ris/pali to PP1M may significantly improve HRU and provide potential cost savings in VHA patients with schizophrenia and ≥1 prior hospitalization.     

Treatment patterns and Medicaid spending in comorbid schizophrenia populations: once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus oral atypical antipsychotics

Objective: To compare treatment patterns and Medicaid spending between schizophrenia patients initiating once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) and oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) within four comorbid populations: cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, hypertension and obesity.

Methods: Five-state Medicaid data identified comorbid adults with schizophrenia initiating PP1M or OAAs (index) from September 2009 balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Chi-squared and t-tests compared index antipsychotic (AP) exposure (no gap >90 days) duration, AP polypharmacy, and index AP adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and persistence (no gap ≥60 days) at 12 months post-index. Linear models with a non-parametric bootstrap procedure compared costs.

Results: PP1M patients consistently had longer index AP exposure (e.g. CVD: 244 vs. 189 days; p?p?p?p?=?.031). Persistence was consistently more likely for PP1M versus OAA patients (e.g. CVD: 49.9% vs. 27.4%; p?p?Conclusions: Treatment with PP1M versus OAAs may reduce AP polypharmacy and increase AP persistence in comorbid patients with schizophrenia, without increasing total healthcare costs. Comorbidities are a highly prevalent driver of excess mortality in this vulnerable population; thus, future studies should specifically address the real-world effectiveness of therapies, including long acting injectable therapies (LAIs), for these patients.     

Prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States Medicare population

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States (US) Medicare population.

Methods: Patients were selected from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (01 January 2010–31 December 2014) to estimate the prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia. The prevalence for each calendar year was calculated as the number of patients with hyperkalemia divided by the total number of eligible patients per year. To estimate the economic burden of hyperkalemia, patients with hyperkalemia (cases) were matched 1:1 to patients without hyperkalemia (controls) on age group, chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage, dialysis treatment, and heart failure. The incremental 30-day and 1-year resource utilization and costs (2016 USD) associated with hyperkalemia were estimated.

Results: The estimated prevalence of hyperkalemia was 2.6–2.7% in the overall population and 8.9–9.3% among patients with CKD and/or heart failure. Patients with hyperkalemia had higher 1-year rates of inpatient admissions (1.28 vs. 0.44), outpatient visits (30.48 vs. 23.88), emergency department visits (2.01 vs. 1.17), and skilled nursing facility admissions (0.36 vs. 0.11) than the matched controls (all p?<?.001). Patients with hyperkalemia incurred on average $7208 higher 30-day costs ($8894 vs. $1685) and $19,348 higher 1-year costs ($34,362 vs. $15,013) than controls (both p?<?.001). Among patients with CKD and/or heart failure, the 30-day and 1-year total cost differences between cohorts were $7726 ($9906 vs. $2180) and $21,577 ($41,416 vs. $19,839), respectively (both p?<?.001).

Conclusions: Hyperkalemia had an estimated prevalence of 2.6–2.7% in the Medicare population and was associated with markedly high healthcare costs.     

Real-world costs of ischemic stroke by discharge status

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the acute healthcare costs of ischemic stroke during hospitalization and the quarterly all-cause healthcare costs for the first year after discharge by discharge status.

Methods: Adult patients with a hospitalization with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM: 434.xx or 436.xx) between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2015 were identified from a large US commercial claims database. Patients were classified into three cohorts based on their discharge status from the first stroke hospitalization, i.e. dead at discharge, discharged with disability, or discharged without disability. Third-party (medical and pharmacy) and out-of-pocket costs were adjusted to 2015 USD.

Results: A total of 7919 patients dead at discharge, 45,695 patients discharged with disability, and 153,778 patients discharged without disability were included in this analysis. The overall average age was 59.7 years and 52.3% were male. During hospitalization, mean total costs (third-party and out-of-pocket) were $68,370 for patients dead at discharge, $73,903 for patients discharged with disability, and $24,448 for patients discharged without disability (p?p?p?p?Conclusion: The results demonstrated the high economic burden of ischemic stroke, especially among patients discharged with disability with the highest costs incurred during the inpatient stays.     

Healthcare costs for allergic rhinitis patients on allergy immunotherapy: a retrospective observational study

Objective: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for allergic rhinitis (AR) has been shown to control symptoms for up to several years following treatment discontinuation, but the effect of SCIT on healthcare costs for commercially insured patients is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare healthcare costs and resource utilization for patients with AR who received SCIT compared with those who discontinued SCIT shortly after initiation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated medical and pharmacy claims from the Optum Research Database from January 2009 through February 2014 for adults and pediatric patients with >7 (continuers) vs. ≤7 (discontinuers) injection visits for SCIT within 60 days of initiation.

Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, each cohort included 6710 patients. Continuers were less likely than discontinuers to use oral corticosteroids (27.7% vs. 29.6%, p?=?.018), or to have ≥1 respiratory-related emergency room visit (5.4% vs. 6.5%, p?=?.008) and ≥1 inpatient stay (1.1% vs. 1.7%; p?=?.002). Continuers were more likely than discontinuers to have ≥1?AR-related office (98.8% vs. 94.6%, p?p?=?.002). Continuers had greater mean total AR-related costs than discontinuers ($1918 vs. $646, p?p?=?.077); when adjusted with a generalized linear model, these costs were significantly lower among continuers (p?Conclusions: Continued SCIT use is associated with decreased emergency room visits and inpatient stays, decreased oral corticosteroid use, and lower respiratory-related costs, compared with early discontinuation.     

Healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes initiating saxagliptin or linagliptin: a US-based claims analysis

Objective: To compare healthcare costs of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after initiation of saxagliptin or linagliptin, two antidiabetic medications in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor medication class.

Methods: Patients with T2D who were at least 18 years old and initiated saxagliptin or linagliptin (index date) between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. All-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related costs (T2D diagnosis on a medical claim and/or an antidiabetic medication claim) were measured in the 1 year follow-up period. Saxagliptin and linagliptin initiators were matched using propensity score methods. Cost ratios (CRs) and predicted costs were estimated from generalized linear models and recycled predictions.

Results: There were 34,560 saxagliptin initiators and 18,175 linagliptin initiators identified (mean ages 57 and 59; 55% and 56% male, respectively). Before matching, saxagliptin initiators had significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs than linagliptin initiators (mean?=?$15,335 [SD $28,923] vs. mean =?$20,069 [SD $48,541], p?p?n?=?16,069 per cohort), saxagliptin initiators had lower all-cause follow-up costs than linagliptin initiators (CR?=?0.953, 95% CI?=?0.932–0.974, p?p?=?0.017; predicted costs?=?$3989 vs. $4159).

Conclusions: Adult patients with T2D initiating treatment with saxagliptin had lower total all-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related medical costs over 1 year compared with patients initiating treatment with linagliptin.     

Real-world outcomes post-transition to once-every-3-months paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia within US commercial plans

Objectives: To compare comorbidity-related outcomes, adherence to antipsychotics (APs), healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs pre- and post-transition to once-every-3-months paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) in commercially-insured patients with schizophrenia.

Methods: Adults with ≥1 claim for PP3M, ≥2 schizophrenia diagnoses, and adequate treatment with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M; i.e. no gap of >45?days in PP1M coverage for ≥4?months, same PP1M dosage for the last two PP1M claims, and appropriate PP1M to PP3M dosing conversion) were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (May 2014–February 2018). Generalized estimating equation models adjusted for repeated measurements were used to compare patient characteristics, adherence to APs, HRU, and costs during the 6-month period pre- vs post-transition to PP3M.

Results: Of 152 included patients, the mean age was 41.0?years and 36.2% were females. Post-PP3M transition, patients were less likely to have a claim with a diagnosis for substance-related and addictive disorders (odds ratio [OR]?=?0.57), psychoses (OR?=?0.57), diabetes without chronic complication (OR?=?0.72), and drug abuse (OR?=?0.64; all p?<?.05). Patients were more likely to be adherent to APs (OR?=?2.01, p?=?.007), compared to the period pre-PP3M transition. There was no significant difference in HRU pre- vs post-transition. All-cause total (mean monthly cost difference [MMCD]?=?$242), pre-rebate pharmacy (MMCD?=?$65), and medical costs (MMCD?=?$176) remained similar pre- vs post-transition (all p?>?.05).

Conclusions: Transitioning to PP3M was associated with an improvement in adherence and in comorbidity-related outcomes related to substance-related and addictive disorders, psychoses, diabetes without chronic complication, and drug abuse. These findings suggest PP3M may enhance comorbidity-related outcomes and adherence while remaining cost neutral.     

Protein-energy wasting significantly increases healthcare utilization and costs among patients with chronic kidney disease: a propensity-score matched cohort study

Background: Disease-related malnutrition is highly prevalent, and has prognostic implications for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, few studies have investigated the impact of malnutrition, or protein-energy wasting (PEW), on healthcare utilization and medical expenditure among CKD patients.

Methods: Using claim data from the National Health Insurance in Taiwan, this study identified patients with CKD between 2009–2013 and categorized them into those with mild, moderate, or severe CKD. Cases with PEW after CKD was diagnosed were propensity-score matched with controls in a 1:4 ratio. Healthcare resource utilization metrics were compared, including outpatient and emergency department visits, frequency and duration of hospitalization, and the cumulative costs associated with different CKD severity.

Results: From among 347,501 CKD patients, eligible cohorts of 66,872 with mild CKD (49.2%), 27,122 with moderate CKD (19.9%), and 42,013 with severe CKD (30.9%) were selected. Malnourished CKD patients had significantly higher rates of hospitalization (p?p?=?.015 for mild CKD, p?=?.002 for severe CKD) than non-malnourished controls. Cumulative medical costs for outpatient and emergency visits, and hospitalization, were significantly higher among all malnourished CKD patients than non-malnourished ones (p?p?Conclusions: In a nationally-representative cohort, CKD patients with PEW had significantly more healthcare resource utilization and higher aggregate medical costs than those without, across the spectrum of CKD: preventing PEW in CKD patients should receive high priority if we would like to reduce medical costs.     

Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis based on real-world data from 2010 to 2015

Objective: Evidence suggests that not all cancer chemotherapy patients who receive first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis (PP) continue to receive it in later cycles, and that these patients may be subsequently at higher risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Available evidence, however, may not be reflective of current clinical practice. We undertook an evaluation to estimate the odds of FN, beginning with second chemotherapy cycle, among patients who received PP in that cycle and all previous cycles versus those who received PP in all previous cycles only, using recent real-world data.

Methods: A matched-cohort design and data from two US healthcare claims repositories (2010–2015) were employed. The source population comprised cancer patients who received intermediate/high-risk chemotherapy and first-cycle PP. From the source population, beginning with the second cycle, all patients who received PP in all previous cycles were identified. From this subset, patients who did not receive PP in the cycle of interest (“comparison patients”) were matched to those who received PP in that cycle (“PP patients”); the same process was repeated for subsequent cycles. Odds ratios (ORs) for FN (broad and narrow definitions) were estimated using generalized estimating equations.

Results: Among 47,254 patients in the source population, 9% did not receive second-cycle PP and were matched to those who did. FN odds in cycle 2 were significantly higher among comparison patients versus PP patients (OR [broad definition]: 1.7, p?p?p?p?Conclusions: In this real-world evaluation of cancer chemotherapy patients who received first-cycle PP, FN risk was substantially higher among patients who did not receive PP in subsequent cycles versus those who continued PP.     

Local infiltration for postsurgical analgesia following total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of liposomal bupivacaine to traditional bupivacaine

Objective: To assess postsurgical clinical and economic outcomes of patients who received local infiltration containing liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional bupivacaine for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: This retrospective study included two groups of consecutive patients undergoing THA. The experimental group received local infiltration with a combination of liposomal bupivacaine, bupivacaine HCl 0.25% with epinephrine 1:200,000, and ketorolac for postsurgical analgesia. The historical control group received the previous standard of care: local infiltration with a combination of bupivacaine HCl 0.25% with epinephrine 1:200,000 and ketorolac. Key outcomes included distance walked, length of stay (LOS), opioid medication use, numeric pain scores, hospital charges, hospital costs, all-cause 30?day readmission rate, and adverse events (AEs). Both unadjusted and adjusted (i.e. age, sex, insurance type, living situation, body mass index, procedure side, and comorbidity) outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The experimental group (n?=?64) demonstrated statistically significant improvement versus the historical control group (n?=?66) in mean distance walked on discharge day (249.2 vs. 180.0 feet; unadjusted p?=?.025, adjusted p?=?.070), mean LOS (2.0 vs. 2.7 days; p?p?=?.002), proportion of patients who used opioid rescue medication on postoperative day (POD) 1 (29.7% vs. 56.1%; p?=?.002, p?=?.003) and POD 2 (7.8% vs. 30.3%; p?=?.001, p?=?.003), mean cumulative area under the curve for pain score on POD 0 (127.6 vs. 292.5; p?p?p?=?.006, both). Among a subgroup of patients with available financial information, mean hospital charges were lower in the experimental group ($43,794 [n?=?24] vs. $48,010 [n?=?66]; p?Conclusions: Infiltration at the surgical site with liposomal bupivacaine was associated with improved postsurgical outcomes when compared with traditional bupivacaine in patients undergoing THA.     

Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis among patients aged ≥65 years: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims

Background: Two recent evaluations reported that risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) may be higher when pegfilgrastim prophylaxis (PP) is administered on same day as chemotherapy rather than per recommendation (1–3 days following chemotherapy). Such evidence is based largely on the experience of younger privately insured adults and may not be generalizable to older patients in US clinical practice.

Methods: A retrospective cohort design and data from Medicare Claims Research Identifiable Files (January 2008–September 2015) were employed. Patients were aged ≥65 years, had breast cancer or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, received chemotherapy with intermediate/high risk for FN, and received PP in ≥1 cycle; cycles with PP were stratified based on administration day (same-day [“Day 0”] vs. 1–3 days following chemotherapy [“Days 1–3”]) and were pooled for analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for FN during the cycle were estimated for patients who received PP on Day 0 versus Days 1–3.

Results: Study population included 65,003 patients who received PP in 261,184 cycles; in 5% of cycles, patients received PP on Day 0. Incidence proportion for FN in cycle 1 was 11.4% for Day 0 versus 8.4% for Days 1–3; adjusted OR was 1.4 (p?p?p?p?Conclusions: Among Medicare patients receiving chemotherapy and PP in US clinical practice, PP was administered before the recommended timing in 5% of cycles and FN incidence was significantly higher in these cycles. Along with prior research, study findings support recently updated US practice guidelines indicating that PP should be administered the day after chemotherapy.     

Early initiation of long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment is associated with lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs in patients with schizophrenia: real-world evidence from US claims data

Objective: Early initiation of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia is associated with improved outcomes. This study aimed to determine if initiation of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic treatment early in a new schizophrenia episode is associated with lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs in a real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective (January 1, 2007–June 30, 2016) cohort analysis used claims from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental databases. In adults ≥18?years with a new episode of schizophrenia, two mutually exclusive cohorts were identified based on time from first recorded schizophrenia diagnosis date to first date of LAI initiation (index date): ≤1?year (early initiators) and >1?year (late initiators). Logistic and general linear regression models were performed to estimate adjusted hospitalization rate and healthcare costs in a 1-year follow-up, controlling patient demographic and clinical characteristics, insurance type, baseline all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits, and baseline psychiatric medication use.

Results: Of the subjects, 32% (n?=?1388) initiated treatment early and 68% (n?=?2978) initiated treatment later. In risk-adjusted models, all-cause hospitalization rates were 22.2% (95% CI?=?19.9–24.6%) in early initiators and 26.9% (95% CI?=?25.2–28.7%) in late initiators (p?=?.002). Of early initiators, 14.1% (95% CI?=?12.3–16.1%) had a psychiatric hospitalization vs 19.2% (95% CI?=?17.7–20.8%) of late initiators (p?<?.001). Adjusted psychiatric healthcare costs were significantly lower in early initiators compared with late initiators [mean (95% CI)?=?$21,545 (20,355–22,734) vs $24,132 (23,330–24,933)] (p?<?.001).

Conclusions: LAI initiation within 1 year of a new schizophrenia episode led to lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs compared with LAI initiation more than 1 year after a new episode.     

Short-term rehospitalizations in young adults with schizophrenia treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics: a retrospective analysis

Objective: To compare rehospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) vs oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs), with a focus on young adults (18–35 years).

Methods: The Premier Healthcare database (January 2009–December 2016) was used to identify hospitalizations of adults (≥18 years) with schizophrenia treated with PP1M or OAA between September 2009 and October 2016 (index hospitalizations). Rehospitalizations were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days after each index hospitalization in young adults and in all patients. Proportions of index hospitalizations resulting in rehospitalization were reported and compared between groups using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 8578 PP1M and 306,252 OAA index hospitalizations were included. Hospitalized young adults treated with PP1M (n?=?3791) were more likely to be seen by a psychiatrist (94.0% vs 90.0%), and had a longer length of stay (12.5 vs 8.6 days) compared to hospitalized young adults treated with OAA (n?=?96,502). Following their discharge, young adults receiving PP1M during an index hospitalization had a 25–27% lower odds of rehospitalization within 30, 60, and 90 days compared to young adults receiving OAAs (all p?<?.001). Similarly, when observing all patients, those receiving PP1M during an index hospitalization had 19–22% lower odds of rehospitalization within 30, 60, and 90 days compared to those receiving OAAs (all p?<?.001).

Conclusions: Following a hospitalization for schizophrenia, PP1M treatment was associated with fewer 90-day rehospitalizations among young adults (18–35 years) relative to OAA treatment. This finding was also observed in other hospitalized adults with schizophrenia.     

Safety,effectiveness, and health care cost comparisons among elderly patients with venous thromboembolism prescribed warfarin or apixaban in the United States Medicare population

Abstract

Objective: To compare safety, effectiveness, and healthcare costs of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and all-cause hospitalization among elderly Medicare VTE patients prescribed warfarin vs apixaban.

Methods: Using 100% Medicare data, elderly patients prescribed apixaban or warfarin within 30 days after a VTE encounter were identified. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment and no parenteral or oral anticoagulant use ≤6 months preceding the VTE encounter. Cohorts were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause hospitalization. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to estimate MB-, recurrent VTE-, and all-cause related costs (per patient per month [PPPM]).

Results: In the pre-matched cohort, 25,284 (66.9%) patients were prescribed warfarin and 12,515 (33.1%) apixaban. After 1:1 PSM, 11,363 matched pairs of apixaban-warfarin patients were included for a mean follow-up of 4.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Matched cohorts had a mean age of 78 years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2.9. Warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (hazard ratio [HR]?=?1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.10–1.57) and CRNM bleeding (HR?=?1.31; 95% CI?=?1.19–1.43) vs apixaban. The risks of recurrent VTE (HR?=?0.96; 95% CI?=?0.70–1.33) and all-cause hospitalization (HR?=?1.05; 95% CI?=?0.99–1.12) were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients. Warfarin patients had higher MB-related ($147 vs $75; p?=?.003) and all-cause costs PPPM ($3,267 vs $3,033; p?<?.001), but similar recurrent VTE-related medical costs PPPM ($30 vs $36; p?=?.516) vs apixaban patients.

Conclusions: Warfarin was associated with significantly higher risk of MB and CRNM bleeding as well as higher MB-related and all-cause costs vs apixaban patients. Recurrent VTE risk and costs were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients.     

Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims

Background: Two recent evaluations reported that many cancer chemotherapy patients discontinue pegfilgrastim prophylaxis (PP) following the first cycle, and that these patients have a higher subsequent risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Such evidence is based principally on the experience of younger adults with private healthcare coverage, and the generalizability of results to elderly Medicare patients is unknown.

Methods: A matched-cohort design and data from the Medicare Claims Research Identifiable Files were employed. The source population comprised cancer patients aged ≥65 years who received chemotherapy with intermediate/high-risk for FN and first-cycle PP. From the source population, beginning with the second cycle, all patients who received PP in all previous cycles were identified. From this sub-set, patients who did not receive PP in the cycle of interest (“comparison patients”) were matched to those who received PP in that cycle (“PP patients”); the same process was repeated for subsequent cycles. Odds ratios (OR) for FN (broad and narrow definitions) were estimated using generalized estimating equations.

Results: Among 77,616 elderly patients in the source population, 5.3% did not receive second-cycle PP and were matched to those who did. In cycle 2, FN odds were significantly higher among comparison patients vs PP patients when employing the broad definition (OR?=?1.9, p?<?.001) and the narrow definition (OR?=?2.1, p?<?.001). Results for subsequent cycles (broad definition: OR?=?2.0, p?<?.001; narrow definition: OR?=?2.1, p?<?.001) and for the last cycle (broad definition: OR?=?1.4, p?=?.060; narrow definition: OR?=?1.7, p?=?.055) were largely comparable.

Conclusions: In this large-scale evaluation of elderly Medicare patients who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy and first-cycle PP in recent US clinical practice, FN risk was substantially lower among patients who continued to receive PP in subsequent cycles vs those who discontinued PP.     

Cost comparison of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy in colon cancer

Background: Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to be safe, oncologically comparable, and clinically beneficial over open colectomy for colon cancer, but utilization remains low.

Objectives To evaluate the cost of laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective claims data analysis using the 2012 and 2013 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter Database. The denominator population consisted of individuals who had commercial insurance coverage in all months of 2012 and >1 month in 2013 and pharmacy coverage throughout eligibility. The study population included individuals aged 18–64 years who were identified with colon cancer in 2013 and underwent an elective inpatient open colectomy or laparoscopic colectomy between January and November 2013. The cost and re-admission rate of open vs laparoscopic colectomy were compared after risk, adjusting for comorbidities, demographics, and geographic region.

Results: During the study period, 1299 elective inpatient colon cancer colectomies were performed (open, n?=?558; laparoscopic, n?=?741). After risk adjustment, the laparoscopic vs open group was shown to have lower re-admission rates (6.61 and 10.93 per 100 cases, respectively, p?=?.0165), lower average re-admission costs ($1676 and $3151, respectively, p?=?.0309), and lower 30-day post-discharge healthcare utilization costs ($4842 and $7121, respectively, p?=?.0047). Average allowed cost for the combined inpatient and 30-day post-discharge period was lower for laparoscopic vs open colectomy cases ($36,395 and $44,226, respectively, p?Conclusions: The cost of laparoscopic colectomy was found to be statistically significantly less than that of open colectomy in patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer.     

Effects of non-medical switching on outcomes among patients prescribed tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Objective: To evaluate health care use and outcomes among patients who experienced a non-medical switch of their prescribed anti-tumor-necrosis-factor biological agent (anti-TNF) for cost containment reasons.

Methods: Retrospective evaluation of Humedica electronic health records of patients ≥18 years old with anti-TNF treatment for immune conditions. Using natural language processing, stable patients who experienced a non-medical switch (for cost reasons) of their anti-TNF between 2007 and 2013 were identified (NMS cohort, n?=?158) and matched to patients who did not (control cohort, n?=?4804). Rates of office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations at 30, 90, and 365 days following were evaluated. Medication-related adverse events, defined as subsequent medication change due to a side effect and/or efficacy-related reason were also compared.

Results: Adjusted rates of office visits were higher among the NMS cohort than the control cohort at 30 (46.4% vs. 31.7%, p?p?p?p?=?.003), 90 (31.6% vs 9.6%, p?p?p?=?.001).

Conclusion: Non-medical switching among patients prescribed anti-TNFs was associated with increased health care use, medication-related side effects, and reports of diminished efficacy.     

Comparative analysis of length of stay,hospitalization costs,opioid use,and discharge status among spine surgery patients with postoperative pain management including intravenous versus oral acetaminophen

Background: Recovery from spine surgery is oriented toward restoring functional health outcomes while reducing resource use. Optimal pain management is a key to reaching these objectives. We compared outcomes of spine surgery patients who received standard pain management including intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (APAP) vs. oral APAP.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Premier database (January 2012 to September 2015) comparing spine surgery patients who received pain management with IV APAP to those who received oral APAP, with no exclusions based on additional pain management. We performed multivariable logistic regression for the discharge and all cause 30-day readmission to the same hospital outcomes and instrumental variable regressions using the quarterly rate of IV APAP use for all hospitalizations by hospital as the instrument in two-stage least squares regressions for length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and average daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) outcomes. Models adjusted for age, gender, race, admission type, 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group severity of illness and risk of mortality, hospital size, and indicators for whether the hospital was an academic center and whether it was urban or rural.

Results: We identified 112,586 spine surgery patients with 51,835 (46%) having received IV APAP. Subjects averaged 57 and 59 years of age respectively in the IV APAP and oral APAP cohorts and were predominantly non-Hispanic Caucasians and female. In our adjusted models, IV APAP was associated with 0.68 days shorter LOS (95% CI: ?0.76 to ?0.59, p?p?p?p?Conclusions: Compared to oral APAP, managing post-spine-surgery pain with IV APAP is associated with less resource use, lower costs, lower doses of opioids, and improved discharge status.     

Prescribing patterns and healthcare costs of gout

Objective/methods: The Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) 2010 was used to identify gout cases and their number of gout flares.

Results: Out of 21,376 gout patients, a total of 3561 (16.7%) had frequent gout flares (≥3 gout flares/year). Average all-cause healthcare utilization (35.9 visits vs. 30.7 visits; p?<?.001) and gout-related utilization (22.7 visits vs. 15.6 visits; p?<?.001) were higher in frequent gout flare patients than in those with infrequent gout flares. The median gout-related cost (USD $369 vs. $285; p?<?.001), but not all-cause costs (p?=?.25), were higher in frequent gout flare patients compared to the infrequent group. Over 55.8% of the flares were treated with colchicine?+?NSAIDs.

Conclusions: In conclusion, patients with frequent gout flares had higher healthcare utilization and gout-related healthcare costs. Colchicine?+?NSAIDs are commonly used therapy for gout flare.