Topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma

Abstract.   Piura B, Rabinovich A. Topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 612–617.
Topotecan has demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian carcinoma. This report examines the activity and toxicity of topotecan in 29 heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1–5, every 21 days. It was second-line chemotherapy in 6 (20.7%) patients, third-line in 15 (51.7%), fourth-line in 4 (13.8%), fifth-line in 3 (10.3%), and seventh-line in 1 (3.4%). Median dose intensity was 1.667 mg/m²/week, and median relative dose intensity was 0.67. Disease complete response was observed in 5 (17.2%) patients, partial response in 1 (3.4%), stable disease in 12 (41.4%), and progressive disease in 11 (37.9%). CA-125 complete response was observed in 3 (10.3%) patients, partial response in 11 (37.9%), stable level in 5 (17.2%), and progressive level in 9 (31%), and no data were available in 1 (3.4%) patient. Toxicity was mainly hematologic: grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 20 (69%) patients, grade 3–4 leukopenia in 12 (41.4%), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 9 (31%), and grade 3–4 anemia in 2 (6.9%). It is concluded that topotecan has considerable activity and noncumulative hematologic toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

A phase II study of two topotecan regimens evaluated in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG 146Q)

Objective.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinomas.

Methods.

A randomized phase II analysis of platinum-sensitive patients with measurable disease was performed independently assessing intravenous topotecan 1.25 mg/m² daily × 5 every 21 days (regimen I) and topotecan 4.0 mg/m²/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (regimen II). All patients were treated until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity, or patient refusal. Insufficient accrual related to regimen I resulted in a redesign of the study as a single arm phase II trial assessing only regimen II. More complete efficacy data is presented for regimen II as enrollment on regimen I was insufficient for some analyses.

Results.

A total of 81 patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible. Fifteen patients received regimen I, while 65 patients were treated with regimen II. The response rate on regimen I (daily × 5) was 27% (90% CI: 10-51%) and 12% (90% CI: 6-21%) on regimen II (weekly). The median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 27.8 months, respectively, for regimen II. Grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 93% with daily × 5 dosing and 28% for weekly treatment. Febrile neutropenia was very low in both groups.

Conclusion.

The weekly regimen of topotecan appeared less active but resulted in less toxicity than the daily regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.     

Effectiveness of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty patients were treated with topotecan at a dose of 4 mg/m(2) weekly. Efficacy was determined according to the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group criteria. Median age was 62 years (45-78). Patients had received 1-7 (median 3) prior chemotherapy lines. A total of 203 weekly treatments were administered. In 13 patients (65%) treatment delay was necessary due to bone marrow toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 11 patients (55%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four patients (20%). Six patients (30%) needed a dose reduction, and 42 cycles (21%) were given with dose reduction. No neutropenia, fever, or sepsis was observed. There was one complete response and one partial response (response rate 10%). All patients with response had platin-sensitive disease (three out of eight). Six patients needed blood transfusion. None of the patients required granulocyte/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The median duration of response was 13 months. In addition, there were four patients (20%) with a stable disease lasting at least for 4 months. Based on the results of this Phase II study, the toxicity of weekly topotecan seems to be lower than with the 3-weekly topotecan. The response rate of 10% is low but was not expected to be higher as these patients were heavily pretreated.     

A phase II study of outpatient first-line paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

The purpose of this study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (PCB) primary induction therapy for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma. Twenty patients were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)), carboplatin (AUC of 5 IV), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) of body weight; q21 days for six cycles. Bevacizumab was administered at cycles two through six. Patients received 116 cycles of PCB chemotherapy (median = 6, range 2-6) and were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in 23.3% and 25% of cycles, with no incidence of grades 3/4 thrombocytopenia or anemia. Prior to cycle six, one patient was removed from the study due to grade 3 neuropathy and another patient was excluded due to clinical deterioration. There was no incidence of gastrointestinal perforations, and only two patients demonstrated grade 3 hypertension (HTN). No grade 4 HTN was observed. Eighteen patients were evaluated for response following induction therapy. Six demonstrated a complete response (30%) and ten exhibited a partial response (50%), resulting in a total response rate of 80%. One patient exhibited stable disease (5%), and one demonstrated disease progression (5%). The lack of bowel perforations and wound complications should mitigate some concerns regarding these side effects. This study suggests that first-line treatment with PCB can be safely administered to previously untreated advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma patients. The favorable toxicity results and reasonable response rate warrant additional study in a larger patient population.     

A phase II trial of oxaliplatin,docetaxel, and bevacizumab as first-line therapy of advanced cancer of the ovary,peritoneum, and fallopian tube

Objective

To determine the safety and efficacy of the novel combination of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab as first-line treatment of advanced cancer of the ovary, peritoneum or fallopian tube after initial debulking surgery.

Methods

Eligible patients (stage IB-IV) were treated with 6 cycles of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), docetaxel (75 mg/m²), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks, followed by single-agent bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks to complete one year of therapy. The primary endpoint was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 132 patients (80 with measurable disease at baseline; 52 with non-measurable, evaluable disease at baseline) enrolled and received study treatment. At diagnosis, 76.5% of patients had stage III disease and 20% had stage IV. 62.9% were optimally cytoreduced. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (42.4%), leukopenia (13.6%), hypertension (8.3%), fatigue (6.1%), and nausea (6.1%). One patient (0.8%) had a fatal gastrointestinal perforation. The best overall confirmed response rate (complete response + partial response [measurable disease subgroup]) was 58.6% (95% CI 49%, 67%). CA-125 response rates for the measurable and non-measurable disease subgroups were 83.0% and 81.5%, respectively. The 12-month PFS rate for the measurable disease subgroup was 65.7% (95% CI 53.4%, 76.7%); median PFS was 16.3 (95% CI 12.6, 19.6) months. Median overall survival was 47.3 (95% CI 34.1, upper limit not applicable) months.

Conclusions

This novel treatment regimen may provide a promising therapeutic approach for women with ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma. No unanticipated safety concerns were identified.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

Phase II evaluation of topotecan and navelbine in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer treated with topotecan at 2.5 mg/m² days 1 and 8 plus vinorelbine at 25 mg/m² days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.Materials and methodsEligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with either platinum-resistant or platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were required to have a performance status of ≤ 2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity were assessed using standard criteria. Chi square and Student's t-tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsAll 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 30–82). Median treatment-free interval was 4.0 months. A total of 216 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median of 5.0 cycles per patient. Overall median TTP with this treatment regimen was 19 weeks (range 2–136 weeks). The response rate was 30% overall, and the response for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 44% (95% CI:22–69%) and 18% (95% CI:5–40%) respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 1–9 months). Median overall survival was 16.4 months (range 1.5–51.7 months). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 58% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed.ConclusionAdministration of topotecan and navelbine is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. This regimen may be considered especially in platinum-sensitive patients if a non-platinum based doublet is desired.     

Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent platinum- and taxane-resistant low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube.

Methods

This open-label, single-institution phase II trial enrolled patients with platinum-resistant LGSC who had measurable disease, had received up to 4 platinum- and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens, and had been previously screened for at least one imatinib targeted biomarker (c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor [PDGFR]-β, or bcr-abl). Imatinib (600 mg) was administered daily for one 6-week course and continued in the absence of toxicity and disease progression.

Results

Thirteen patients were enrolled; 12 were evaluable for toxicity, and 11 were evaluable for response. A total of 17 courses were administered (median, 1 course; range, 1-5 courses). Complete or partial responses were not observed. One patient had stable disease for 7.3 months. c-Kit, bcr-abl, or PDGFR-β were present in 48%, 77%, and 100% of patients, respectively. No correlation between best response (stable disease) and the presence of imatinib-targeted biomarkers was observed. Adverse events included grade 3 skin rash in one patient leading to discontinuation of the drug, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 2 weight gain in two patients leading to dose reductions. The most common grade 1 or 2 toxicities were fatigue (66%), nausea/vomiting (66%), and diarrhea (41%); grade 3 toxicities included skin rash and granulocytopenia events. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. The median progression-free survival time was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.27, 1.40 months), and the median overall survival time was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.0, 18.9 months).

Conclusion

Imatinib is well-tolerated but has no activity in patients with platinum- and taxane-resistant LGSC or the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube.     

Efficacy and tolerability of lower-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective case review

Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle) is an established recurrent ovarian cancer treatment, but myelosuppression can be dose limiting. This study evaluates the activity and tolerability of low-dose topotecan in our clinical experience. Case records were reviewed for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in first through third relapse. Eligible patients had received > or =2 cycles of < or =1.25 mg/m(2) topotecan. Adverse events were evaluated using laboratory and clinical evaluation data. Twenty-seven eligible patients, most with advanced disease, received a total of 209 cycles (median, six cycles). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during 184 cycles in 24 assessed patients were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 35%, 28%, 36%, and 11% of cycles, and 21, 19, 16, and 10 patients, respectively. Only four grade 4 toxicities occurred: anemia (one) and thrombocytopenia (three). Myelosuppression was reversible, noncumulative, and manageable. Moreover, nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and the only two grade 3 events were constipation and deep vein thrombosis. Low-dose topotecan was active in this setting. Lower-dose topotecan is generally well tolerated and active in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Prospective clinical trials of low-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.     

A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with advanced,persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the antitumor activity of topotecan in women with advanced, persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy, and to determine the nature and degree of toxicity of topotecan in this cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those who had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen. Topotecan 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m(2) was administered iv daily for 5 days, every 3 weeks, until progression of disease or adverse affects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Of 29 patients entered, 28 were evaluable for toxicity and 22 were evaluable for response. Patient characteristics included a median age of 65, with 41% having prior radiation and 14% having prior hormonal therapy. Nine patients (41%) had a performance status (PS) of 0, 11 (50%) had a PS of 1, and 2 (9%) had a PS of 2. Patients received from 2 to 11 (with a median of 4) courses of treatment. The most frequently observed grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia seen in 17 (61%) patients, leukopenia in 11 (39%), and thrombocytopenia in 7 (25%). Two deaths were considered potentially related to treatment. There was one (4.5%) complete and one (4.5%) partial response; 12 (55%) patients maintained stable disease and eight (36%) experienced increasing tumor. CONCLUSION: Topotecan at this dose and schedule does not appear to have major activity in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy.     

An open label evaluation of topotecan in patients with relapsed or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer – single institution experience in a developing country

Abstract. Malik IA. An open label evaluation of topotecan in patients with relapsed or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer–single institution experience in a developing country.
Investigators in developing countries rarely get an opportunity to participate in clinical drug trials in oncology. We recently participated in two clinical trials involving the use of topotecan in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who had failed initial platinum based chemotherapy. It provided us an opportunity to gain experience with the use of a rather highly myelosuppressive drug and also enabled us to compare our data with those reported from the western countries. Thirty-nine patients with good performance status and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal functions were accrued. All patients had previously received at least one platin containing regimen of chemotherapy. The most common histologic sub type was serous adenocarcinoma. Almost half of the patients had platinum refractory disease. Mean number of cycles delivered was 7.5. Eleven patients (28%) achieved complete or partial remission. Time to progression was 4.6 months. Mean overall survival was 11.3 months. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and manageable. Performance status was the only variable predictive of response. Ability to obtain informed consent, data management, and availability of adequate radiologic and laboratory facilities were important limitations. Our results confirm the applicability of results obtained in the western countries to other patient groups and ability to conduct clinical trials in oncology in the developing countries.     

Phase II study of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian,fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Platinum-sensitive or -resistant patients with recurrent or persistent EOC were eligible if they had received up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, including a platinum/taxane regimen without prior bevacizumab. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m² IV and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); other endpoints included toxicities, PFS and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-four patients received a median of 7 treatment cycles (range, 2–26). Median follow-up was 25.7 months (range, 3.0–47.2). Six month progression-free survival (PFS) was 56% (95% CI: 38–71). The following response rates were documented (%; 95% CI): 0 complete response, 14 partial responses (41%; 25–59), 18 stable disease (53%; 35–70) and 2 progressive disease (6%; 1–20). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–10.9), with a median OS of 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.4–29.8). Twenty-two patients (64.7%) had a platinum-free interval (PFI) of > 6 months prior to enrollment. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and anemia (9%). Non-hematologic grade 3–4 toxicities included metabolic (29%), constitutional (18%), pain (18%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Two patients developed hematologic malignancies within one year of treatment.

Conclusions

Combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed is an active option for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant recurrent EOC. Further investigation of cost and novel toxicities associated with this regimen may be warranted.     

A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian cancer, but attempts to combine these agents are limited by myelotoxicity. This phase I/II trial combined weekly topotecan, which is less myelosuppressive than the standard 5-day regimen, with carboplatin in patients with potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma (PS-OVCa/PCa). METHODS: Eligible patients had PS-OVCa/PCa, performance status 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions. On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) followed by topotecan 2.0 mg/m2, both via 30-min intravenous infusion. Topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 also was administered on days 8 and 15. Treatment was withheld for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia on day 8 or 15. Dose escalation was planned. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 115 (median, 6) cycles of chemotherapy. With carboplatin AUC 4, neutropenia prevented dose escalation of topotecan; hematologic toxicity caused 34/105 (32%) weekly treatments to be withheld. However, carboplatin could be dose escalated to AUC 5 when the day 15 dose of topotecan was withheld. In the intent-to-treat population, there were 4 (24%) complete and 9 (53%) partial responses, 2 (12%) patients (at the carboplatin AUC 4 dose) with stable disease, and 2 (12%) nonevaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 in combination with topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is well tolerated and active in patients with PS-OVCa/PCa. A phase II trial comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is warranted.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel, topotecan, cisplatin and Filgrastim in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian epithelial malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: To determine a recommended dose level (RDL) of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan in women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer as a possible experimental arm in a future Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III study. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV disease were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, followed 2 h later by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Topotecan was administered on consecutive days as a 30-minute infusion, beginning after cisplatin on day 1, receiving either 5 days beginning at 0.3 mg/m2 (cohort 1), or 3 days beginning at 0.5 mg/m2 (cohort 2). Treatment was given every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five evaluable patients were enrolled in the two cohorts. Thrombocytopenia and prolonged neutropenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Dose-limiting neutropenia was seen at the first dose level, thus all subsequent dose escalations included Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 1 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily x 5 with Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 2 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily x 3 with Filgrastim. CONCLUSION: In women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan is feasible. However, this treatment requires the use of Filgrastim and attenuated dosing of topotecan in both a 5-day and 3-day topotecan infusion schedule.     

Phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven patients received liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2)) infused at day 1, followed by topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) infusion daily for 5 days. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. This combination regimen showed an overall response rate of 28%. Median time to progression was 30 weeks, with a median overall survival of 40 weeks. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was shown in 70% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 41% of patients. Neutropenic fever was reported in 11% of patients. After reviewing the first 12 patients, the internal review board decided to administer topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg/m(2) and liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) for the remainder of the study. However, this adjustment did not lead to reduction in bone marrow toxicity nor to an improvement in dose intensity. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and mucositis were more reported in the second cohort but usually mild. The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan demonstrates favorable response data in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. However, substantial bone marrow toxicity limits further clinical use.