Laparoskopie bei Dünndarmileus

Today laparoscopic procedures are routinely performed in patients with intestinal adhesions from previous abdominal surgery. Does laparoscopy have a potential benefit in acute small-bowel obstruction? Theoretically, a lower rate of wound complications and incisional hernias, as well as less subsequent adhesions with a lower incidence of recurrent intestinal obstruction, can be expected. However, laparoscopy is successful in only 50-70% of selected patients, thereby representing the highest rate of conversion in minimally invasive surgery. Laparoscopic management of severe abdominal distension with massively dilated and fragile small-bowel or dense adhesions is extremely difficult even when performed by experienced surgeons. Significantly prolonged operating time, the high risk of bowel injury (> 6-10%) and an increased frequency of early reoperations jeopardize the patient's safe outcome. However, in strictly selected patients the laparoscopic approach may be promising. In acute intestinal obstruction without a history of previous abdominal surgery, laparoscopy is--in the absence of adhesions--an excellent diagnostic tool and may also be a successful therapeutic modality in a variety of bowel-obstruction etiologies. Furthermore, the laparoscopic option should be considered in patients who previously had undergone small laparotomies (e.g., appendectomy) or laparoscopic surgery. We recommend "postlaparoscopic" intestinal obstruction as the ideal case for laparoscopic reexploration. Incarcerated hernias at the site of trocar insertion or adhesions due to peritoneal tears are easily identified as the cause of obstruction and successfully cured with the laparoscope. In conclusion, we advocate the laparoscopic approach in acute small-bowel obstruction exclusively for selected patients. Clinical studies are required to define appropriate surgical indications objectively.     

Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction*

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of obstruction in the intestinal tract involve the small intestine in three quarters of cases and the large intestine in one-quarter. The most common causes of an acute small intestinal obstruction are postoperative adhesions (64.8%) and strangulated hernias (14.8%). The overall incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction is 4.6%. Because it offers a conservative and targeted means of removing the obstruction, laparoscopy is increasingly used for acute small bowel obstruction. With proper selection of patients, the success rate is very high. This work presents the selection criteria, technique and results for a three-year period. METHODS: Twenty-one patients, 13 men and 8 women aged 28 to 69 years, underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2010. Selection criteria for a laparoscopic procedure were anesthesia risk of not more than ASA 3, diameter of the dilatated loop of small intestine of not more than 5 cm, radiological image of a change in caliber as an indication of a focal passage disorder, exclusion of paralytic ileus, and no history of diffuse peritonitis. The patients underwent surgery in general anesthesia. The approach for the first trocar was umbilical in 18 cases and in the right or left flank in three cases, but always with open technique. Three trocars were always used. RESULTS: In 7 patients, there was an isolated band from a previous operation, usually an appendectomy; in 5 cases there were postoperative adhesions and a band. Three patients had a volvulus and in one of them, a 20 cm segment of the small intestine was already gangrenous. Two patients had an incarcerated hernia, one inguinal and one Bochdalek. Two patients had a stenosing tumor in the terminal ileum, one of which was a carcinoid and the other, the first manifestation of a lymphoma. One patient had an endometriosis focus as stenosis focus and another had a massively inflamed Meckel's diverticulum that obstructed passage in the small intestine. Two patients – the volvulus with small intestinal gangrene and the Bochdalek hernia – required conversion to open technique. One patient with diffuse adhesions and a band had to undergo open surgery 10 days later. There was no case of an intraoperative accidental intestinal injury. All the patients who underwent laparoscopy were discharged within a week. Hospitalization was significantly longer for the converted patients. The patient with the Boachdalek hernia died after 26 days of irreversible cardiopulmonary failure. CONCLUSIONS: With strict selection, laparoscopic treatment of small intestinal obstruction is a valuable option in visceral acute surgery. Patients with an isolated focal obstruction seem to benefit from laparoscopic surgery on the basis of reduced perioperative morbidity and short hospitalization.     

Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction caused by postoperative intussusception

Small bowel obstruction is a common problem, especially for patients who have had previous abdominal surgery possibly complicated by postoperative adhesions. In contrast to adhesions, postoperative intussusception is an unusual cause of small bowel obstruction. We report a case of small bowel obstruction that occurred one month after antrectomy for duodenal ulcer with massive bleeding. Laparoscopic surgery was attempted after conservative treatment failed. A segment of jejunojejunal intussusception about 50 cm below the ligament of Treitz was identified and laparoscopic reduction of the intussusception was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and remained asymptomatic at 10-month follow-up. Although not frequently encountered, postoperative intussusception should be considered a possible etiology in patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction. In experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach offers a feasible option for correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment in this situation.     

Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of acute small bowel obstruction resulting from a congenital band

Acute small bowel obstruction is a common problem, especially for those patients with previous abdominal surgery that can cause postoperative adhesions. Acute, non-postoperative small bowel obstruction is less common and has various etiologies. We report a case of acute small bowel obstruction without previous abdominal surgery. The patient underwent laparoscopic exploration, and a congenital band was found to cause direct compression of the ileum and entrapment of a segment of bowel loop. There was evidence of bowel strangulation. The color and peristalsis of the entrapped bowel loop recovered gradually after division of the band, and segmental bowel resection was avoided. He has remained asymptomatic since the procedure. We suggest early and aggressive surgical intervention for patients with acute, non-postoperative small bowel obstruction to avoid possible complications of bowel strangulation and gangrene. A laparoscopic approach may be a safe, feasible, and favorable option for correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment in this situation.     

Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Conventional surgical management of acute small bowel obstruction involves laparotomy. The laparoscopic approach has not been favoured due to the presumed increased risk of bowel injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of our experience of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction was undertaken. Nine patients were identified from 1997 to 2003. The aetiology of obstruction was identified laparoscopically in all cases. Eight cases were caused by bands or local adhesions and one patient had a bezoar. RESULTS: Laparoscopic treatment was successful in 78% of patients including one laparoscopy-assisted procedure. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in two patients, one due to difficult adhesiolysis and one due to iatrogenic bowel injury during adhesiolysis. The mean operating time was 74 minutes. There were no postoperative complications and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.3 days. CONCLUSION: This small series demonstrates that laparoscopy can serve as a good diagnostic tool as well as treatment of acute small bowel obstruction. In an appropriately selected patient, laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction is a feasible therapeutic approach and appears to convey the benefits of a short postoperative hospital stay, reduced postoperative complications and possibly reduced subsequent adhesion formation.     

Celioscopic treatment of small intestine obstructions

We evaluated the reliability and immediate results of celioscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. From January 1995 to April 1998, 39 patients underwent a primary celioscopic procedure for small bowel obstruction. The most common etiology was post operative adhesions (34 patients). The whole operation could be carried out exclusively by celioscopy in 22 patients (56%). A laparotomy had to be performed in 17 patients due to: impossibility to identify or treat the cause of obstruction, bowel necrosis or intraoperative complication (3 bowel wounds). Post operative complications were: 1 death (not directly related to the surgical procedure), 2 early recurrences of obstruction after exclusive celioscopy, 1 evisceration after laparotomy and 1 small bowel fistula after conversion to laparotomy. Mean hospital stay was 5 days after exclusive celioscopy and 9.5 days after conversion to laparotomy. Celioscopic management of small bowel obstruction is feasible, but it is often difficult and may be hazardous; a careful selection of patients must be made, based on the importance of obstruction and the type of previous abdominal surgery.     

Comparison of Urografin versus standard therapy in postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Water-soluble contrast media (Urografin) cause redistribution of intravascular and extracellular fluid into intestinal lumen due to their hyperosmolarity. As a consequence, these media decrease intestinal wall edema and act as a direct stimulant to intestinal peristalsis. In this prospective study, we aimed to examine objectively the therapeutic role and ability of Urografin in patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction for whom failed to respond to conservative treatment. Three hundred and seventeen patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction due to intraperitoneal adhesions were included prospectively in this study. In the Urografin group, 40 mL Urografin diluted in 40 mL distilled water was administered through the nasogastric tube. No contrast media were administered in the control group, but the patients were decompressed via a nasogastric tube continuously. The number of obstruction episode in 317 patients was 338. In total, 199 patients were in the Urografin group, and 118 patients were in the control group. In the Urografin group, 178 (89.4%) patients responded successfully to the treatment, but 21 (11.6%) patients underwent surgical operation. Intensive intraabdominal adhesions and obstructing fibrous bands were observed and repaired in 15 (71.4%) patients at the operation, while 6 patients underwent segmental small intestine resection in control group, conventional management was successful in only 89 (75.4%) patients, and the remaining 29 (24.6%) patients underwent surgical intervention. In conclusion, it was suggested that in patients with intestinal obstruction due to postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion, water-soluble contrast media such as Urografin may be safely administered via a nasogastric tube or oral route and may decrease the need for surgical operation; furthermore, they may help the physician to operate the patients who needs surgery as early as possible.     

术后肠梗阻诊治再认识

手术后肠梗阻因好发于小肠,也称手术后小肠梗阻（PSBO）,是腹部手术后常见急腹症。其诊治关键是准确把握病情走向,避免贻误手术时机造成肠坏死严重后果,但过于积极的手术干预可能会造成不必要的手术。PSBO诊断水平的提高得益于影像学技术的进步,增强CT对预测肠绞窄和急诊手术的准确率可达90%,判断病因的准确率也达85%～90%;小肠插管减压后经导管注入Gastrografin进行造影,不但能够促进PSBO缓解,提高非手术治疗成功率,还可以缩短住院时间,避免贻误手术时机。除术后早期炎性肠梗阻外,对于反复发作的PSBO,手术治疗能够去病因,避免复发。择期手术疗效优于急诊手术,对于反复发作的PSBO,应争取在最佳的时机进行手术治疗。对于简单的PSBO,可选择腹腔镜手术,但要避免伤及小肠,同时松解粘连要完全;复杂的PSBO首选开放手术,其效果满意。PSBO的预防依赖于仔细的手术操作,虽然腔镜手术后PSBO发病率是否低于开放手术尚缺乏可靠的数据,但保护肠管、避免异物残留,是预防PSBO的关键。     

Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy has expanded to include the management of acute abdomen. This study describes the author's experience with laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. METHODS: From February 1994 through March 1998, 19 patients underwent laparoscopic intervention for acute small bowel obstruction. Their clinical data were analyzed to evaluate the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients underwent 20 exploratory laparoscopies. The cause of obstruction was diagnosed correctly in 17 of the patients (90%). Fifteen patients (79%) had adhesions, nine of which were postoperative. Of the 19 patients, 13 (68%) had successful laparoscopic treatment. Laparotomy was required in six patients (32%) for various lesions including ileocecal tuberculosis. The average time for laparoscopy was 58 min. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. There was no morbidity or mortality in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is a feasible and safe alternative to laparotomy for most patients with acute small bowel obstruction.     

Mind the gap – Small bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair – A case report

Introduction and importanceInguinal hernia repair is a very frequent operation in general and visceral surgery worldwide. The laparo-endoscopic approaches such as TAPP have gained increasing acceptance among specialists and many consider them as standard of care due to perioperative safety and excellent postoperative results. Knowledge of specific complications after minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery, however, is important for the successful management of these patients.Case presentationWe herein present the case of a 75-year-old female patient who electively underwent laparoscopic repair of combined inguinal and femoral hernia. During the postoperative course a small bowel obstruction occurred requiring emergency re-laparoscopy revealing a preperitoneal herniation of small bowel through a peritoneal defect.Clinical discussionSmall bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation of small bowel through a peritoneal defect after laparoscopic hernia repair is extremely rare. In such cases, emergency laparoscopic revision is necessary to avoid bowel ischaemia. Adequate closure of the peritoneum during the primary procedure along with the necessary attention to detail seems mandatory to avoid preperitoneal herniation after TAPP.ConclusionInadequate peritoneal closure after TAPP may lead to preperitoneal herniation of the small bowel leading to postoperative intestinal obstruction. All hernia surgeons should be aware of this rare, but potentially life-threatening complication and should close all peritoneal defects with greatest care and accuracy.     

Laparoscopy-assisted management of jejunal bezoar obstruction

Treatment of intestinal bezoar causing obstruction is usually straightforward by an open approach, with either digital fragmentation or removal of the bezoar via an enterotomy. Herein, we report a case of small bowel bezoar obstruction treated successfully by laparoscopic technique. The bezoar was fragmented manually via a minilaparotomy and then pushed into the cecum with laparoscopic forceps. Laparoscopic management is an alternative to conventional surgery for intestinal bezoar that provides shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain and may be recommended as the treatment of choice of such patients.     

Laparoscopy for adhesions

Intestinal and abdominal adhesions may be responsible for a variety of clinical conditions, including chronic recurrent small-bowel obstruction, acute small-bowel obstruction, closed-loop bowel obstruction and, debatably, abdominal or pelvic pain. Experience in laparoscopic surgery has increased at a rapid pace, thus adhesions are no longer considered a contraindication to treatment of these conditions. In recent years, numerous publications have reported the feasibility, safety, and favorable outcome of laparoscopic intervention in various adhesion-related conditions. As adhesions are the most common cause of recurrent or acute bowel obstruction, this review will focus on the laparoscopic management of these conditions and outline the technical considerations, indications, contraindications, and results.     

Laparoscopic surgery for small bowel obstruction

At the beginning of the laparoscopic surgery, intestinal obstruction was considered an absolute contraindication for this approach, because of the high risk of injuring the bowel. Today, the increased experience allows to apply this method in certain selected cases of small intestine obstruction. We realised a retrospective study, over a period of 7 and a half years (January 1997 - June 2004), regarding the patients admitted and treated in our department for small intestine obstruction, both by open surgery (88 cases) and by laparoscopic surgery (11 cases). We compared the preoperative characteristics of the two subgroups, highlighting the importance of a careful selection of the cases for the success of the laparoscopic approach. We analysed the postoperative evolution of these patients (return of bowel function, postoperative wound evolution, hospital stay, socioeconomic reintegration), which allowed us to draw the conclusion that some of the patients with obstruction of the small intestine may benefit from the advantages of the mini-invasive surgery.     

Small intestinal obstruction

Small intestinal obstruction remains a frequently encountered problem in abdominal surgery. Although modern day surgical management continues to focus appropriately on avoiding operative delay whenever surgery is indicated, not every patient is always best served by immediate operation. Certain entities, such as SBO secondary to incarcerated abdominal wall hernia, and patients with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of strangulation do require prompt operative intervention. Other conditions, however, such as postoperative adhesions and neoplastic-associated SBO, particularly in patients with numerous previous abdominal procedures, concomitant medical problems, or incomplete or partial obstruction, often justifiably benefit by a trial of nonoperative management. The risk of strangulation with adhesive and neoplastic SBO is relatively low as compared with incarcerated hernia and small bowel volvulus. Close and careful clinical evaluation, in conjunction with laboratory and radiologic studies, will usually dictate the proper course of management in any given case. If any uncertainty exists, prompt operative intervention is indicated. Because over 50 per cent of all cases of SBO are the direct result of postoperative adhesions, it is probably just as important as the actual management of SBO for all practicing abdominal surgeon to familiarize themselves with the widely accepted "ischemic theory" of adhesion formation. A number of intraoperative measures, many of which go against established surgical principles, are now encouraged during routine elective abdominal surgery to reduce the incidence of detrimental adhesions that might subsequently produce SBO. At the same time, surgeons should continue their aggressive attitude towards elective repair of any and all abdominal hernias, which continue to account for close to 15 per cent of all cases of small intestinal obstruction and still remain the most common cause of strangulation.     

Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: Review of 1061 cases

Background Acute small bowel obstruction has previously been considered a relative contraindication for laparoscopic management. As experience with laparoscopy grows, more surgeons are attempting laparoscopic management for this indication. The purpose of this study is to define the outcome of laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction through an analysis of published cases. Methods A literature search of the Medline database was performed using the key words laparoscopy and bowel obstruction. Further articles were identified from the reference lists of retrieved literature. Only English language studies were reviewed. We excluded studies that included patients with chronic abdominal pain, chronic recurrent small bowel obstruction, or gastric or colonic obstruction, when the data specific to acute small bowel obstruction could not be extracted. Data was analyzed based on an intention to treat. Results Nineteen studies from between 1994 and 2005 were identified. Laparoscopy was attempted in 1061 patients with acute small bowel obstruction. The most common etiologies of obstruction included adhesions (83.2%), abdominal wall hernia (3.1%), malignancy (2.9%), internal hernia (1.9%), and bezoars (0.8%). Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 705 cases with a conversion rate to open surgery of 33.5%. Causes of conversion were dense adhesions (27.7%), the need for bowel resection (23.1%), unidentified etiology (13.0%), iatrogenic injury (10.2%), malignancy (7.4%), inadequate visualization (4.2%), hernia (3.2%), and other causes (11.1%). Morbidity was 15.5% (152/981) and mortality was 1.5% (16/1046). There were 45 reported recognized intraoperative enterotomies (6.5%), but less than half resulted in conversion. There were, however, nine missed perforations, including one trocar injury, often resulting in significant morbidity. Early recurrence (defined as recurrence within 30 days of surgery) occurred in 2.1% (22/1046). Conclusion Laparoscopy is an effective procedure for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction with acceptable risk of morbidity and early recurrence.     

Bowel obstruction after open and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND: Bowel obstruction is increasingly recognized as an important complication after gastric bypass. This study analyzed late bowel obstruction after open and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of 1,378 patients who had proximal gastric bypass during the years 2002 and 2003 at a large bariatric center were evaluated for readmission with bowel obstruction requiring operations. In the study group, 697 patients underwent a laparoscopic approach and 735 had an open approach to gastric bypass. Patients had a minimum followup of 18 months. RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group, 68 of the 697 patients were readmitted for bowel obstruction requiring operations, for an incidence of 9.7%. There were 14 additional recurrent obstructions, for a total of 82 operations. Of the 68 patients requiring reoperations, 3 (4.4%) required bowel resection and 8 (11.7%) had conversion to an open approach. Bowel resections were performed in two of the three patients with a second episode of bowel obstruction. The average time intervals between the primary operation in 2002 and 2003 and the first episode of obstruction were 511 and 385 days, respectively. There were no readmissions requiring operations for late bowel obstruction in the open gastric bypass group. CONCLUSIONS: We found an unanticipated high incidence of bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. There were no hospital admissions for bowel obstruction requiring operations in the open gastric bypass group. Lack of adhesions and the resulting free displacement of small bowel after laparoscopy appear to be the cause of this complication. Open gastric bypass surgery produces thin, diffuse upper abdominal adhesions that may then stabilize the bowel and prevent internal hernias and bowel obstruction. An open approach may be a reasonable option for management of recurrent episodes of bowel obstruction after laparoscopy.     

Laparoscopic Treatment of a Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction

We describe the case report of a 25-year-old female who presented with signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction status after laparoscopic treatment of an ectopic pregnancy performed 3 weeks earlier. The patient underwent laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and reduction of small bowel obstruction. This case report presents an atypical cause of postoperative bowel obstruction and reviews the current literature regarding laparoscopic surgery as an approach for treatment.     

腹腔镜与内镜联合技术治疗胃肠疾病

In recent years, the concept of minimally invasive surgery has become accepted by the surgical community, though there are limitations in locating small gastrointestinal tumors when laparoscopy is used alone. Meanwhile, endoscopy is an excellent tool for locating these small tumors, though one must take extreme care to avoid hollow viscus perforation. Combination of laparoscopy and gastroduodenoscopy has extensive application in the resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, sessile gastric polyps and early gastrointestinal carcinoma. During laparoscopic operation, the endoscopist can help to locate the tumor or polyp. Endoscopy can also help to determine whether or not the tumor or polyp has been resected completely. In performing traditional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colonic tumors, specimen retrieval necessitates a mini-incision which is often the cause of postoperative pain, wound infection, and other pain-related complications. The combination of laparoscopy with transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for selected patients with left-sided colonic tumors, and complications related to mini-incision can be avoided completely. Combination of laparoscopy and gastrointestinal endoscopy also benefits patients with acute bowel obstruction prior surgical operation. With the help of perineum-bowel tube, sigmoidoscopic technique can relieve acute bowel obstruction, so that these patients may have chance for laparoscopic operation. In summary, this hybrid approach can not only decrease surgical incisions, but also avoid some of the surgical risks of emergent operations.     

Laparoscopic management as the initial treatment of acute small bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively evaluated our experience with laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction (SBO). METHODS: The study group included all patients requiring surgical intervention based on complete mechanical SBO by clinical assessment or who had failed conservative management. Patients with malignant causes were excluded. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons performed all operations. RESULTS: Between January 1998 to January 2003, 61 patients required operative intervention for acute SBO. Causes included adhesions, internal hernia, incarcerated incisional hernia, and inflammatory bowel disease. Laparoscopic techniques (LAP) alone were successfully used to complete 41 cases (67%). Twenty patients (33%) were converted (CONV) to either mini-laparotomy [7 patients (35%)] or standard midline laparotomy [13 patients (65%)]. A single band was identified in 25 patients (41%). Complications occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We believe all patients requiring surgery in the setting of acute small bowel obstruction should undergo a laparoscopic approach initially. By specifically identifying those patients with a single band as the cause of obstruction, a significant number of patients will be spared a large laparotomy incision. Conversion should not be viewed as failure, but rather, a sometimes necessary step in the optimal management of these patients.