The Use of Implantable Sensors for the Control of Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardias: A Comparative Evaluation Between Minute Ventilation Sensing and Acceleration Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacemakers

The role of implantable sensors to control pacemaker mediated tachycardias was investigated in 16 patients with two different dual chamber rate adaptive (DDDR) pacemakers, which sensed eiter minute ventilation (DDDR-Meta, nine patients) or body acceleration (Relay, seven patients). Successive atrial sensed events beyond a programmable rate occurring in the absence of detection of exercise by the sensors were considered to represent retrograde conduction or atrial arrhythmias, and the pacemakers responded by either a mode shift from DDDR to ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing (DDDR-Meta) or by tracking at an interim rate, the so-called conditional ventricular tracking limit (CVTL, Relay). In the unipolar atrial sensing mode, myopotential sensing (MPI) and external chest wall stimulations (CWS) at 250 beats/min were induced to be preferentially sensed by the atrial channel to simulate the conditions of atrial arrhythmias. In the DDD mode, these maneuvers resulted in ventricular responses of 88 +/- 3 beats/min and 110 +/- 3 beats/min for MPI and CWS, respectively. The pacing rate was significantly reduced in the DDDR mode with the sensors correctly detecting and responding to the sensed abnormal atrial signals (68 +/- 5 beats/min during MPI and 71 +/- 5 beats/min during CWS, P less than 0.005 compared with the corresponding DDD rate). One patient with a Relay pacemaker developed spontaneous atrial flutter and the ventricular tracking responses were 140 and 85 beats/min in the DDD and DDDR pacing modes, respectively. Thus MPI and CWS are useful bedside testing methods to assess pacemaker response during atrial arrhythmias. The use of implantable sensors to judge the appropriateness of atrial rate is a new approach to the management of pacemaker mediated tachycardias.     

Undesirable Mode Switching with a Dual Chamher Rate Responsive Pacemaker

The Telectronics 1250 Meta MV DDDR pacemaker is a new device featuring automatic mode switching from DDDH to VVIR pacing in the event of an atrial arrhythmia. Although mode switching is a valuable feature, sinus tachycardia can cause an undesirable mode switch to occur. Of 24 implants at this institution, 11 have been for an AV conduction disorder. Eight of these 11 patients were specificalJy evaiuated for undesirable mode switching. During exercise testing and/or Holter monitoring, mode switching was repeatediy seen in seven of the eight at low levels of exercise. Factors precipitating mode switching were a low rate response factor, low upper rate setting, long base postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) and a long AV delay. During Holter monitoring, patients spent up to 50% of the time in VVIR pacing as opposed to DDDR pacing. It is concluded that patients with intact sinus node function are at risk of undesirable mode switching and should probably be programmed to the DDD mode unless there is a specific indication for DDDR pacing. If the DDDR mode is chosen, careful selection of the aforementioned pacing parameters is required.     

Early Clinical Experience with a Minute Ventilation Sensor DDDR Pacemaker

The new DDDR pacemaker META DDDR utilizes a minute veritilation sensor based on transthoracic impedance measurements. The sensor determines the metabolic indicated interval, the atrioventricular (AV) delay and the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). The baseline PVARP must be carefully selected to define nonphysiological tachycardias. If a Pwave falls within the PVARP the pacemaker will automatically switch to the VVIR mode. This behavior prevents tracking of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT). Twenty-eight patients with sinus node dysfunction (n = 20), AV junction ablation (n = 5), complete or intermittent AV block (n = 3); who received a META DDDR pacemaker were studied. The mean age was 65 ± 13 years. Results: mode switching (reversion) to VVIR was observed in 57% of the patients. Forty-two percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a stress test four related to PAT, and seven to sinus tachycardia. Fifty percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a 24-hour Holter, four related to PAT, three to retrograde P wave sensing, and two to sinus tachycardia. At the last follow-up, 20 of the 26 patients initially programmed to the DDDR mode remained in the DDDR mode, while five were reprogrammed to the DDD and one to the VVIR mode. Mode switching has a high sensitivity but a low specificity for PAT. It appears to be a useful approach to prevent rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Careful PVARP programming is critical to appropriate reversion behavior, but further modifications of the algorithm are needed to improve its performance.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

The "Automatic Mode Switch" Function in Successive Generations of Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Responsive Pacemakers

Automatic mode switch (AMS) from DDDR to VVIR pacing is a new algorithm, in response to paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. With the 5603 Programmer, the AMS in the Meta DDDR 1250 and 1250H (Telectronics Pacings Systems, Inc.) operates when VA is shorter than the adaptable PVARP. With the 9600 Programmer, an atrial protection interval can be defined after the PVARP. The latest generation, Meta DDDR 1254, initiates AMS when 5 or 11 heart cycles are > 150, 175, or 200 beats/min. From 1990 to 1993, 61 patients, mean age 61 years, received a Meta DDDR: in 24 a 1250, in 12 a 1250H and in the remaining 25 a 1254 model. Indication for pacing was heart block in 39, sick sinus syndrome in 15, the combination in 6, and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in 1. Paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias were present in 43. All patients had routine pacemaker surveillance, including 52 Holter recordings. In 32 patients, periods of atrial tachyarrhythmias were observed, with proper AMS to VVIR, except during short periods of 2:1 block for atrial flutter in 4. In two others, undersensing of the atrial arrhythmia disturbed correct AMS. With the 1250 and 1250H model, AMS was observed on several occasions during sinus rate accelerations in ten patients. This was never seen with the 1254 devices. Final programmation was VVIR in 2 (chronic atrial fibrillation), AAI in 1 (fracture of the ventricular lead), VDDR in 1 (atrial pacing during atrial fibrillation), DDD in 5, and DDDR in 53, 48 of whom had AMS programmed on. The AMS detection algorithm in the successive models of the Meta DDDR appears to have become more specfic.     

Rate Augmentation and Atrial Arrhythmias in DDDR Pacing

SPENCER, W.H., ET AL.: Rate Augmentation and Atrial Arrhythmias in DDDR Pacing. Dual chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers provide the capability of augmenting the heart rate of patients with chronotropic incompetence but also may cause atrial arrhythmias because of high rate, competitive atrial pacing. We studied ten patients with two consecutive 24-hour Holter monitors during which they were alternately programmed to either DDD or DDDR pacing in random order. Maximum heart rates (max HR) were measured at every 15-minute interval during each 24-hour period. DDDR pacing showed rate augmentation, 80 ± 7 average max HR when compared with DDD pacing, average max HR 76 ± 5. These results were even more striking when waking hours (7 am to 10 pm) were compared: average max HR 86 ± 7 DDDR versus 78 ± 4 average max HR DDD. Several patients showed marked rate augmentation. Seven of ten patients preferred DDDR pacing over DDD pacing. In the entire population, DDDR pacing did not result in an increased number of atrial arrhythmias (1.25 atrial events 124 hour) when compared to DDD pacing (1.75 atrial events/ 24 hour). We conclude that DDDR pacing provides heart rate augmentation during daily life in a clinical population while not resulting in a significant increase in atrial arrhythmias. (PACE, Vol. 13, December, Part 11, 1990)     

Aerobic Capacity in Rate Modulated Pacing

Whether heart rate or AV synchrony is the most important factor for an increase in aerobic capacity was evaluated in a comparative study between sinus bradycardia, VVIR, DDD, and DDDR stimulation. Sixteen patients (mean age 67 years) with chronotropic incompetence and impJanted DDDR pacemaker (Telectronics META 1250) were randomly studied by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. All patients were exercised to their anaerobic threshold (ATJ with the following heart rates: DDD 84 ± 3, WIR 110 ± 5, and DDDR 116 ± 6 beats/min. Mean oxygen uptake (VO₂, mL/kg per min) at AT was 7.4 ± 0.3 in DDD and WIR modes. A 12% increase was measured in DDDR mode (8.3 ± 0.4). Compared to VVIR work capacity in the DDDR mode was improved by 17% (41 vs 48 W/min). In patients with isolated sinus node disease (n = 9) the increase of VO₂ and work capacity at AT during DDDR mode was more pronounced (16% and 20%, respectively, compared to VVIR). In patients with intermittent second or third degree AV block (n = 7) the differences between the pacing modes were not significant. This might partly be due to a lesser degree of chronotropic incompetence in this subgroup. In conclusion only the conjunction of heart rate increase and preservation of AV synchrony provides a significant improvement in aerobic capacity during exercise.     

A New Pacemaker for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation of the AV Junction

Atrial fibrillation is a relative contraindication to atrial synchronous pacing because of the risk of the tracking of rapid atrial rhythms by the pacemaker. In this study, we describe the clinical results of an AV synchronous rate responsive pacemaker with an original algorithm, which is able to sense pathological increments in atrial rate and automatically to switch into a non-AV synchronous mode of pacing. This pacemaker was implanted in 12 patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation of the A V junction in order to cure severely symptomatic, drug refractory, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In an acute, intrapatient comparison between the standard AV synchronous mode and the automatic switching mode, ventricular tracking of atrial fibrillation occurred in 35% and 4% of total beats at rest and in 24% and 2% of total beats during exercise, respectively (P < 0.001). During 5 ± 4 months of follow-up, no further tachyarrhythmia related symptoms occurred. In conclusion, the standard DDDR mode is unable to eliminate ventricular tracking of atrial fibrillation, thus undermining the efficacy of AV junction ablation therapy. The automatic switching mode eliminates this adverse effect of dual chamber pacing.     

Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Quality-of-Life in DDDR Pacing: Atrioventricular Synchrony or Rate Adaptation?

Al though differences in exercise performance have been observed between different rate adaptive modes, the relative impact of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and rate adaptation on quality of life (QOL) have not been determined. Thirty-three patients with either sinoatrial disease (18) or complete atrioventricular (AV) block (15) received DDDR pacemakers (16 minute ventilation sensing, 17 activity sensing). There were 11 males and 22 females, with a mean age of 66 ± 1 (range 39–78) years. The study was a double-blind, triple cross-over study comparing DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes. At the end of each 8-week study period in each mode, QOL was assessed by a questionnaire evaluating patients' functional class (Classes I-IV), physical malaise inventory (41 items), illness perception (43 items), and overall QOL rating based on a 48 items measure covering different aspects of the patients' daily life adjustment. Two patients required early crossover from VVIR mode during the study. Patients experienced significantly fewer physi cal malaise such as temperature intolerance, dyspnea, and palpitations in the DDDR mode, compared with either DDD or VVIR pacing. DDDR pacing reduced the perception of illness in 5 of 43 items compared to VVIR pacing, and improved stamina and appetite compared to DDD pacing. The overall QOL score was 102 ± 2, 105 ± 2, 113 ± 2 in the DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes, respectively, with a higher score indicating a poorer QOL (DDDR/DDD vs VVIR, P < 0.02). There was no change in functional classes between the three pacing modes. In conclusion, VVIR pacing has a lower QOL compared with DDD pacing, which can be further enhanced with rate augmentation.     

A Comparison of VVIR and DDDR Pacing Following Cardiac Transplantation

We compared the clinical course of patients paced in VVIR versus DDDR mode to determine the most appropriate method of pacing following cardiac transplantation. Pacemaker implantation was required in 9 of 90 orthotopic cardiac transplants (10%). Indications included sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest (8 patients) and AV node dysfunction (1 patient). VVIR pacemakers were implanted in four patients and DDDR in five patients. DDDR patients : The mean P wave was 1.7 mV and the mean atrial stimulation threshold was 0.8 V (at 0.5 msec). During follow-up of 20 months, two atrial lead complications developed (29% of leads in 33% of patients). No lead complications were directly related to endomyocardial biopsy. VVIR patients : All four patients developed VA conduction with mean VA time 180 msec (160–240 msec). Two patients developed pacemaker syndrome. Conclusions : VA conduction and pacemaker syndrome may develop in cardiac transplant recipients paced in the VVIR mode. Dual chamber pacing is technically feasible and preferable following cardiac transplantation.     

Comparison of Ventricular Function in Atrial Rate Adaptive Versus Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacing During Exercise

The hemodynamic effects of two different pacing modes—rate adaptive atrial (AAIR) versus dual chamber (DDDR) pacing—were assessed in 12 patients with DDDR pacemakers during upright bicycle exercise first-pass radionuclide angiography using a multiwire gamma camera with tantalum-178 as a tracer. All patients had sinus node disease with intact AV conduction. Patients exercised to the same heart rate in random order in these two different pacing modes, AAIR and DDDR with AV delay (of 100 msec) selected to maintain 100% ventricular capture. Cardiac output in creased significantly above baseline values during exercise in both pacing modes: 154 ± 41% (mean ± SEM, P = 0.002) with AAIR, versus 95 ± 24% (P = 0.004) with DDDR (P = NS between the two modes). The peak filling rate, likewise, increased in both pacing modes (2.3 ± 0.21 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.8 ± 0.31 end-diastolic volumes/sec in AAIR [P = 0.0004] and 2.2 ± 0.18 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.4 ± 0.27 end-diastolic volumes/sec in DDDR [P = 0.0008]). LV ejection fraction was normal at rest (60 ± 4%, SEM) and did not significantly change with submaximal exercise in either pacing mode (both 56%, P = NS). No significant changes in end-diastolic volume or stroke volume indexes occurred with exercise in either pacing mode. Our study demonstrates that in patients with normal resting LV function, AAIR and DDDR pacing are equally effective in attaining appropriate increases in cardiac output and LV filling during exercise.     

Variability of Left Atrial Bloodflow Predicts Intolerance of Ventricular Demand Pacing and May Cause Pacemaker Syndrome

Variability of left and right atrial and left ventncular bloodflow was studied using transthoracic and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography and related to pacemaker mode preference during everyday activity. Bloodflow variability was less at all sites during dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber pacing. However, in patients suffering from pacemaker syndrome and whom prefer DDDR pacing, significantly increased variability of left atrial antegrade (but not retrograde) bloodflow during VVIR pacing compared to DDDR pacing was noted, which was not evident in patients tolerating VVIR mode pacing. This effect was not detected at any other site and suggests that adverse left atrial hemodynamics may result in intolerence to VVI/R mode pacing and might cause pacemaker syndrome.     

Initial Experience with Mode Switching in a Dual Sensor, Dual Chamher Pacemaker in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Mode switching algorithms have been developed to avoid tracking of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) during DDD(R) pacing. Upon recognition of AF or AFL, the mode is switched to a nontracking, sensor driven mode. The Vitatron Diamond model 800 pacemaker does this on a beat-to-beat basis. Atrial events occurring within a “physiological range” (± 15 beats/min) calculated from a running average of the atrial rate are tracked. When atrial events are not tracked the escape interval is either determined by the sensor(s) or by a fallback algorithm thereby preventing large increases in V-V interval during mode switching. Loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony by atrial premature beats and after an episode of AF or AFL is prevented by atrial synchronization pulses (ASP), which are delivered after a safe interval (timed out from the sensed premature atrial event) has expired and before delivery of the next ventricular stimulus. We implanted 26 such devices in 18 men and 8 women with symptomatic second- or third-degree AV block and paroxysmal AF or AFL. Their ages ranged from 18–84 years (mean 60), and the follow-up ranged from 2–13 months (mean 8). During pacemaker check-up, exercise testing or 24-hour Holter monitoring one or more episodes of mode switching was documented in 8 patients. In these 8 patients a smooth transition (ventricular rate) from sinus rhythm to AF or AFL was documented on one or more occasions, without inappropriate increase in ventricular rate in the DDDR mode. None of the patients complained of palpitations. Appropriate rate response was seen in all patients during Holter monitoring and exercise. Restoration of AV synchrony with ASP was documented many times. In 2 patients the DDIR mode was programmed due to intermittent synchronization of ventricular stimuli to near incessant supraventricular tachycardia, which sometimes gave rise to asymptomatic slightly irregular ventricular paced rhythms below WO beats/min. Recognition of AF or AFL was reliable. No inappropriate increases in ventricular pacing rate were seen at the onset of or during AF or AFL. ASP is an effective method of maintaining AV synchrony and avoiding competitive atrial pacing.     

Initial Experience with a New Algorithm for Automatic Mode Switching from DDDR to DDIR Mode

Implantation of dual chamber devices in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias who require permanent pacemakers may lead to significant complications due to an inappropriately triggered ventricular response. VVI/VVIR units cause loss of AV synchrony in the presence of sinus activity. A new DDDR device (THERA DR, model 7940), with an automatic mode switching (AMS) algorithm, was evaluated. When the mean atrial rate is > 182 beats/min, atrial tachyarrhythmia is detected, and AMS is activated. Twenty-three patients (12 males, mean age 71 ± 7 years) underwent implantation of a THERA DDDR device with the AMS algorithm. Seventeen patients had AV block and/ or sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrial arrhythmias, and 6 patients (2 with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) had SSS and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The follow-up period was from 1–9 months. During follow-up, Holter monitoring and treadmill tests were performed. Results : Eighty-seven episodes of AMS were recorded. Telemetered AMS recordings demonstrated episodes in which the DDDR mode switched to the DDIR mode in the presence of PAF, and reverted to DDDR when sinus rhythm returned. Paroxysmal supraventricuiar arrhythmias with a heart rate < 182 beats/min did not activate tbe mode switch. Conclusions : This early, short-term clinical experience with a DDDR device capable of AMS from DDDR to DDIR demonstrated appropriate clinical function and response to PAF. These preliminary results suggest that DDDR pacemakers with AMS to DDIR may significantly extend the current indications for dual chamber pacing.     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

A Randomized, Single-Blind Crossover Comparison of the Effects of Chronic DDD and Dual Sensor VVIR Pacing Mode on Quality-of- Life and Cardiopulmonary Performance in Complete Heart Block

The aim of this study was to compare DDD and dual sensor VVIR (activity and QT) pacing modes in complete AV block (CAVB). Eighteen patients (14 men and 4 women, aged 70 ± 6.5 years) implanted with a dual chamber, dual sensor pacemaker for CAVB with normal sinus node chronotropic function were studied. A quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptom questionnaire, and a treadmill exercise test were completed after a period of VVIR and a period of DDD pacing, each lasting 1 month. Overall quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptoms did not significantly differ, though three patients felt discomfort during VVIR mode. There was no significant statistical difference in Cardiopulmonary parameters. DDD and VVIR modes yielded the following respective data: maximum heart rate = 105.7 ± 21.8 beats/minute versus 107.6 ± 21.6 beats/minute (NS); maximum workload = 60 ± 33.4 W versus 59.3 ± 37.8 W (NS); treadmill duration = 10.1 ± 3.8 minute versus 10.1 ± 3.6 minute (NS); oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold = 14.6 ± 4.1 ml/kg per minute versus 14.9 ± 4.6 mL/kg per minute (NS); maximum minute ventilation = 49.6 ± 9 L/min versus 46 ± 12 L/min (NS); and respiratory quotient = 1.08 ± 0.15 versus 1.08 ± 0.13 (NS). We conclude that, during a 1-month follow-up period, no difference was found between DDD and dual sensor VVIR (QT and activity) pacing modes in CAVB patients with regard to quality-of-life and Cardiopulmonary performance, though a trend toward an increased sense of well being was noted with the DDD mode.     

Quality-of-Life During DDD and Dual Sensor VVIR Pacing

Twenty-one patients (mean age 68 ± 8 years) with dual-sensor (QT + activity) DDDR pacemaker were randomly assigned to a crossover, double-blind study in order to evaluate their quality-of-life scores. All pacemakers were implanted for sick sinus syndrome (8 patients) or complete heart block (13 patients). The pacemakers were randomly programmed to VVIR or DDD pacing modes for 2-week periods and then the pacing mode was switched for another 2-week period. At the end of each period, the quality-of-life was evaluated by a questionnaire with regard to cardiovascular symptoms, physical activity, psychosocial and emotional functioning, and self-perceived health. Nineteen questions were scored 0–5 points each. Significant improvement in the mean total quality-of-life score (20.5 ± 14.9 vs 34.8 ± 17.4) as well as in dyspnea on effort, dizzy spells, palpitation, sweating, fatigue, lethargy, emotional functioning, and self-perceived health was observed during DDD compared to VVIR pacing. No question was scored in favor of VVIR pacing mode. Significant improvements during DDD pacing was demonstrated in all subgroups of patients (sick sinus syndrome, chronotropically competent and incompetent patients, and patients with high degree AV block). Eighteen patients preferred DDD pacing mode, while only one preferred WIR pacing mode. Two remaining patients expressed no preference. The results suggest that DDD pacing offers better quality-of-life than dual sensor VVIR pacing in all subgroups of patients commonly indicated for pacemaker implantation.     

Initial Clinical Experience with a Single Pass VDDR Pacing System

Although ventricular rate adaptive pacing (VVIR) improves exercise capacity and cardiac output compared to constant rate ventricular pacing (WI), this pacing mode does not provide benefit of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. We evaluated the use of a custom-built VDDR pacing system using a single pass, ventricular lead, which detects end cavity P wave using a pair of diagonally arranged atrial bipolar (DAB) electrodes. In the VDDR mode, AV synchrony is enabled and the P wave rate is used in conjunction with an accelerometer based activity sensor for rate adaptive pacing. A VDDR pacemaker was implanted in three patients with complete AV block (mean age 63 ± 1 year) and the mean implantation time was 29 minutes. Mean P wave amplitude was 2.4 mV (1.2–4.2 mV) at implantation and telemeter P wave amplitude was stable over a follow-up of 6 months. At a sensitivity of 0.2 mV, stable P wave sensing was observed during breathing maneuvers, arm swinging, my potential induction, and Holter recording. Paired exercise tests performed in the VDDR and VVIR modes showed higher cardiac output at rest, during exercise, and in the recovery period in the VDDR pacing mode. Thus VDDR pacing using a single pass lead is superior to VVIR pacing by enabling P synchronous ventricular pacing without adding to the complexity of implantation.     

Functional Atrial Undersensing Associated with Switching to a Tracking Mode of Pacing

We have previously demonstrated that contemporary St. Jude devices (pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators [ICDs]; St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) are designed to generate an extended postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) of 475 ms at the termination of conventional automatic mode switching (AMS) in response to atrial tachyarrhythmias . This response may cause functional atrial undersensing . A similar PVARP response unrelated to conventional AMS was found in four St. Jude devices (three ICDs and one pacemaker) whenever a nontracking pacing mode switched to a tracking DDD(R) mode. PVARP extension and functional atrial undersensing were observed when the VOO, VVI, and the DDI(R) modes (unrelated to conventional AMS) switched to the DDD(R) mode . In one patient the switch from the OOO mode (in the programmed noise reversion mode) to the DDD mode occurred after cessation of electromagnetic interference disturbing the ventricular channel. In this case PVARP extension was seen only in the corresponding markers because no P waves occurred coincidentally with the extended PVARP. The PVARP extension caused by a mode switch to the tracking function was designed to prevent sensing of a retrograde P wave on the first cycle of the reestablished tracking mode. The observed functional atrial undersensing is a normal manifestation of device function and must not be misinterpreted as a true atrial undersensing problem. (PACE 2012; 35:1188–1193)