Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols with or without long-term steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients are variable and are transplant center-specific. The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study was to compare 5-year outcomes in kidney recipients maintained on 4 different calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy. Two hundred consenting patients who received kidney transplants between June 2000 and October 2004 were enrolled in 4 immunosuppression protocol groups, with 50 patients in each group: cyclosporine (CSA)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CSA/sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC)/MMF, and TAC/SRL. Induction therapy was done with basiliximab and methylprednisolone. Steroids were withdrawn on post-transplant day 2, and long-term steroid therapy was not used. Demographic characteristics among the four groups were comparable; approximately 50% of the recipients were African American and > or =80% of the kidneys transplanted were from deceased donors. Clinical acute rejection (CAR) was confirmed by biopsy and treated with intravenous pulse steroid therapy. Steroid-unresponsive CAR was treated with Thymoglobulin. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR), chronic allograft injury (CAI), and other pathological changes per the Banff 2005 schema. The primary end point was CAR, and secondary end points were 5-year patient and graft survival rates, renal function, SCAR, CAI, and adverse events. In the first year post-transplant, the incidence of CAR was 18% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 14% in the TAC/MMF group, and 4% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. TAC/SRL; p=0.05). The incidence of SCAR was 22% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 16% in the TAC/MMF group, and 6% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.05). After the first year, the incidences of CAR and SCAR decreased and were comparable in all 4 groups. At 5 years post-transplant, cumulative CAI due to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), hypertension (HTN), and chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity was observed in 54%, 48%, and 8% of the CSA/MMF group vs. 16%, 36%, and 12% of the CSA/SRL group vs. 38%, 24% and 6% of the TAC/MMF group vs. 14%, 25% and 12% of the TAC/SLR group (IF/TA: CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.04, HTN: CSA/MMF vs. TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL; p=0.05, CNI toxicity: TAC/SRL and CSA/SRL vs. TAC/MMF; p=0.05). Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 82% and 60% in the CSA/MMF group, 82% and 60% in the CSA/SRL group, 84% and 62% in the TAC/MMF group, and 82% and 64% in the TAC/SRL group (p=0.9). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances at 5 years were comparable among the groups. Our data show that the rates of CAR and SCAR in the first year post-transplant were significantly lower in the CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL groups and that cumulative CAI rates due to IF/TA and HTN at 5 years were significantly lower in the TAC/MMF, TAC/SRL, and CSA/SRL groups than in the CSA/MMF group. Despite significant differences in the incidences of CAR and SCAR and prevalence of different types of CAI at 5 years, renal function and patient and graft survival rates at 5 years were comparable among kidney recipients maintained on 4 different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil/Sirolimus Compared to Other Common Immunosuppressive Regimens in Kidney Transplantation

We evaluated outcomes with the sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination regimen (SRL/MMF) in solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2005 reported to the Scientific Registry of Renal Transplant Recipients. Three-and-a-half percent received SRL/MMF (n = 2040). Six-month acute rejection rates were higher with SRL/MMF (SRL/MMF: 16.0% vs. other regimens: 11.2%, p < 0.001). Overall graft survival was significantly lower on SRL/MMF. SRL/MMF was associated with twice the hazard for graft loss (AHR = 2.0, 95% C.I., 1.8, 2.2) relative to TAC/MMF, also consistent in both living donor transplants (AHR = 2.4, 95% C.I., 1.9, 2.9) and expanded criteria donor transplants (AHR = 2.1, 95% C.I., 1.7-2.5). Among deceased donor transplants, DGF rates were higher in the SRL/MMF cohort (47% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). However, adjusted graft survival was also significantly inferior with SRL/MMF in DGF-free patients (AHR = 1.9, 95% C.I., 1.6-2.3). In analyses restricted to patients who remained on the discharge regimen at 6 months posttransplant, conditional graft survival in deceased donor transplants was significantly lower with SRL/MMF compared to patients on TAC/MMF or CsA/MMF regimens at 5 years posttransplant (64%, 78%, 78%, respectively, p = 0.001) and across all patient subgroups. In conclusion, SRL/MMF is associated with inferior renal transplant outcomes compared with other commonly used regimens.     

Clinical outcome of heart transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil

Tacrolimus (TAC) is a calcineurin inhibitor that is used for cardiac allograft rejection. Efficacy and safety data of a combined TAC/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy in comparison with a TAC/cortisone therapy in heart recipients are lacking. We analysed the clinical outcome of 41 patients who received TAC in combination with MMF (TMF group) and of 41 patients who received TAC in combination with cortisone (TCO group). Outcomes were serum creatinine levels, cardiac rejections, cytomegalovirus infections, graft vasculopathy, malignancy rates and two-yr survival. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two study groups. During follow-up, serum creatinine levels decreased slightly in the TMF group (p=0.039) but not in the TCO group. Compared with the TMF group, more clinically proven cardiac rejections which needed a cortisone bolus and more severe rejections that needed lymphoablative therapy with OKT occurred in the TCO group (p=0.001 and 0.04, respectively). In contrast, significantly more cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections occurred in the TMF group compared with the TCO group (p=0.01). The number of patients with graft vasculopathy as well as malignancy rates and overall survival did not differ significantly between the two study groups. The introduction of MMF was associated with an improvement of renal function and a more efficient immunosuppressive therapy. However, this treatment strategy also had led to a higher CMV infection rate compared with cortisone. Consequently, no general recommendation can be given at present whether TAC should be combined with MMF or with cortisone in heart transplant recipients.     

Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS: Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.     

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

Abstract:  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are effective immunosuppressive drugs with distinct safety profile.
Methods:  Kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppressive regimen were randomized to receive fixed daily doses of MMF (2 g/d, n = 50) or SRL (one loading dose of 15 mg, 5 mg/d till day 7 and 2 mg/d thereafter, n = 50) without induction therapy.
Results:  No differences were observed in the incidence of the composite (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) end-point (18% vs. 16%, p = 1.000), biopsy confirmed acute rejection (12% vs. 14%, p = 1.000), one-yr patient (94% vs. 98%, p = 0.308), graft (92% vs. 98%, p = 0.168), and death-censored graft survival (98% vs. 100%, p = 0.317) comparing patients receiving MMF or SRL respectively. Patients receiving SRL showed worse safety outcomes, higher mean creatinine (1.6 ± 0.5 mg/dL vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL, p = 0.007), higher proportion of patients with proteinuria (52.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.041), higher mean urinary protein concentrations (0.3 ± 0.5 g/L vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 g/L, p = 0.012), higher mean cholesterol concentration (217 mg/dL vs. 190 mg/dL, p = 0.030), and higher proportion of patients prematurely discontinued from randomized therapy (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.031).
Conclusion:  In patients receiving TAC, MMF produced similar efficacy but superior safety profile compared with SRL.     

Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: preliminary report in Chile

The association of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant patients has diminished the incidence of acute rejection. We evaluated the use of generic TAC and MMF as primary immunosuppression in 6 living related (LR) and 11 cadaveric (C) donor renal transplant recipients (9 men, 8 women) of mean age 37 +/- 12 years (range, 17-56 years) between May 2006 and June 2007. From day 0 all patients received TAC, MMF, and prednisone without antibody induction. They were followed for the development of acute rejection, graft loss, side effects, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 2-15 months). No biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, graft loss, or recipient deaths were observed. Creatinine levels at the end of the study were 1.90 +/- 1.0 mg/dL (range, 0.62-4.25 mg/dL for C recipients and 1.19 +/- 0.15 mg/dL (range, 0.91-1.35 mg/dL) for LR recipients. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 130/73 mm Hg with 12 patients (70.5%) on antihypertensive therapy with calcium antagonists and beta-blockers. Mean (range) of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were 172 (110-244) mg/dL, 139 (69-277) mg/dL, and 89 (63-129) mg/dL, respectively. MMF was suspended in 1 patient due to diarrhea and 1 other because of leukopenia. We observed that generic TAC and MMF yielded effective and safe immunosuppression in terms of mortality, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and graft loss with a low incidence of adverse effects during the study period.     

Comparison of sirolimus and everolimus in their effects on blood lipid profiles and haematological parameters in heart transplant recipients

The mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL) are potent immunosuppressive agents, which allow reducing the dose of the nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin and tacrolimus (TAC) in solid organ transplant recipients. However, there is evidence that mTOR inhibitors may lead to myelosuppression and dyslipidemia/hyperlipidemia. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis in heart transplant recipients with renal insufficiency, who received 3.0 mg/d SRL (SRL group; n = 28) or 1.5 mg/d EVL (EVL group; n = 27) each in combination with a reduced TAC dose for at least one yr. Fewer cardiac rejections, but a similar rate of infections occurred in the EVL group compared with the SRL group indicating that the administered EVL dose resulted in a potent immunosuppression. Serum triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations rose significantly in the SRL group but not in the EVL group. In the SRL group only, the frequency of statin use increased significantly during follow-up. The EVL group showed a significant rise in HDL cholesterol levels during follow-up. There was a slight transient fall in haemoglobin concentrations in the SRL group but not in the EVL group. Leucocyte counts fell significantly in both study groups. However, no cases of leucopenia and also no cases of thrombopenia occurred. In summary, we could demonstrate that in heart transplant recipients with renal insufficiency the introduction of 1.5 mg/d EVL in combination with a reduced TAC dose is effective in preventing cardiac rejections and has less adverse effects on lipid metabolism than the usually prescribed SRL dose, whereas both therapy regimens are not associated with major haematological side-effects.     

The ORION Study: Comparison of Two Sirolimus‐Based Regimens versus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Allograft Recipients

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)‐based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher‐than‐expected biopsy‐confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor‐terminated; therefore, Group 2 two‐year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One‐ and 2‐year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1‐ and 2‐year modified intent‐to‐treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One‐year post hoc analysis of new‐onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between‐group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL‐based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.     

The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation

Haywood S, Abecassis M, Levitsky J. The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E88–E95. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The risk and benefit of adding mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to a standard immunosuppressive regimen at the time of liver transplantation (LT) is not well described. Methods: We performed a retrospective case–control analysis comparing one‐yr outcomes of all LT recipients at our institution treated with post‐operative tacrolimus (TAC), MMF, and steroids vs. TAC and steroids. Results: A total of 101 LT recipients (50:51 case:control) were analyzed. Despite more renal dysfunction at LT, the MMF + TAC group had similar serum creatinine (Cr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as the TAC group one‐yr post‐LT. In this time period, Cr decreased (1.57–1.22 mg/dL, p = 0.04) and GFR increased (57.5–65.1 mL/min per 1.73 m², p = 0.05) in the MMF + TAC group, while Cr increased (1.11–1.35, p < 0.01) and GFR declined (73.5–60.1, p < 0.001) in the TAC group. These findings occurred without a difference in absolute rejection episodes, hospitalizations, infections, deaths, or time to above events (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients stratified by pre‐transplant renal dysfunction (Cr ≥ 1.2 mg/dL) supported the previous. MMF was reasonably well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation. Conclusions: The use of adjunctive MMF immediately after LT may protect against calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, potentially without the need for dose reduction or increased risk of adverse events.     

A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems safe and effective in liver and kidney transplantation. To assess the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation as well as the relative impact of tacrolimus on immunosuppression-related side effects such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, we conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of otherwise identical tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Eighty-five adult patients (pts) at six United States cardiac transplant centers, undergoing their first cardiac transplant procedure, were prospectively randomized to receive either TAC-based (n = 39) or cyclosporine (CYA)-based (n = 46) immunosuppression. All pts received a triple-drug protocol with 15 pts (18%) receiving peri-operative OKT3 to delay TAC/CYA due to pre-transplant renal dysfunction. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 52. The study duration was 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were mostly male (87%) Caucasian (90%) with a mean age of 54 years and primary diagnoses of coronary artery disease (55%) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (41%). There were no significant demographic differences between groups. Patient and allograft survival were not different in the two groups. The probability and overall incidence of each grade of rejection, whether treated or not, and the types of treatment required did not differ between the groups. At baseline and through 12 months of follow-up, chemistry and hematology values were similar between the groups except serum cholesterol was higher in the CYA group at 3, 6, and 12 months (239 vs 205 mg/dL, 246 vs 191 mg/dL, 212 vs 186 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.001). Likewise, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly higher in the CYA group. More CYA patients received therapy for hypercholesterolemia (71% vs 41% at 12 months, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal function, hyperglycemia, hypomagnesemia, or hyperkalemia during the first 12 months. More CYA patients developed new-onset hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment (71% vs 48%, p = 0.05). The incidence of infection was the same for the two groups (2.6 episodes/pt/12 month follow-up). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems effective for rejection prophylaxis during the first year after cardiac transplantation and is associated with less hypertension and hyperlipidemia and no difference in renal function, hyperglycemia or infection incidence when compared to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.     

One-Year Results with Extended-Release Tacrolimus/MMF, Tacrolimus/MMF and Cyclosporine/MMF in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (Prograf XL, formerly referred to as MR or MR4) was compared with the twice-a-day tacrolimus formulation (TAC) and cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), all administered in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, in a phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), open-label trial in 638 de novo kidney transplant recipients. In combination with MMF and corticosteroids, XL had an efficacy profile comparable to TAC and CsA. XL/MMF and TAC/MMF were statistically noninferior at 1-year posttransplantation to CsA/MMF for the primary efficacy endpoint, efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or lost to follow-up). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.6% and 96.7% in the XL/MMF group, 95.7% and 92.9% in TAC/MMF group and 97.6% and 95.7% in CsA/MMF group. The safety profile of XL in comparison with CsA was similar to that observed with TAC in this study and consistent with previously published reports of TAC in comparison with CsA. The results support the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with MMF, corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, as well as XL as a safe and effective once-daily dosing alternative.     

A comparison of discharge immunosuppressive drug regimens in primary cadaveric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Finding the best combination of immunosuppression is an important challenge in kidney transplantation. Current short-term (1- and 3-year) allograft survival is quite good, making it difficult to determine differences in therapeutic regimens without large sample sizes. Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, the current study provides substantial statistical power to analyze the outcomes for different immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: To compare the effects of four discharge regimens (cyclosporine and azathioprine [CYA+AZA], CYA and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], tacrolimus [TAC]+AZA, and TAC+MMF) on long-term survival, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on 19246 primary cadaveric kidney transplants during 1995 to 1998. RESULTS: Compared with CYA+AZA, the combination of CYA+MMF was associated with a 10% reduced risk of graft loss (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence limit [CL] 0.84-0.96, P<0.001), whereas TAC+AZA was associated with an 18% reduced risk (RR 0.82, 95% CL 0.67-1.005, P=0.06) and TAC+MMF with a 20% reduced risk of graft loss (RR 0.80, 95% CL 0.71-0.89, P<0.001). All three regimens benefited patients regardless of delayed graft function (DGF) or early acute rejection status. In addition, in the absence of DGF, the combinations of CYA+MMF, TAC+AZA, and TAC+MMF were associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared with CYA+AZA. CONCLUSIONS: The major finding of this study was improved graft and patient survival associated with TAC+MMF and CYA+MMF in patients with or without DGF or early acute rejection.     

Improved renal function after conversion from tacrolimus/sirolimus to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination. METHODS: We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78). RESULTS: TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.     

Replacement of calcineurin-inhibitors with sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in stable cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess over 2 years the safety and effect on renal function of withdrawal of CNI immunosuppression and replacement with sirolimus (SRL) in stable cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: CNI was substituted with SRL in 78 cardiac transplant recipients (SRL group) of whom 58 (group A) had CNI-induced renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <50 mL/min) and 20 (group B) had preserved renal function (GFR >50 mL/min). Fifty-one patients (CNI group) with renal impairment (GFR < or =50 mL/min) maintained on CNI served as controls. Secondary immunosuppressants were unchanged. RESULTS: In the SRL group, GFR increased from 47.0+/-18.0 to 61.2+/-22.2 ml/min (P=0.0001) 24 months after SRL initiation. In Group A, GFR increased from 40.5+/-12.7 to 53.9+/-19.8 mL/min (P<0.0001). In Group B, GFR increased marginally from 67.2+/-15.8 to 83.5+/-27.8 mL/min (P=0.10). In the CNI group, GFR declined from 40.5+/-14.0 mL/min to 36.4+/-12.5 mL/min (P=0.23) after 24 months of follow up. There was no significant difference in cardiac rejection or cardiac allograft function. In SRL group, proteinuria increased from 299+/-622 mg/day to 517+/-795 mg/day (P=0.0002) 12 months after SRL initiation and then stabilized; it did not differ from CNI group at 24 months (637+/-806 vs. 514+/-744 mg/day, P=0.39). Uric acid decreased from 7.6+/-2.4 to 6.2+/-1.9 mg/dL (P=0.0007) in the SRL group. CONCLUSIONS: Graduated substitution of CNI with SRL in cardiac transplant recipients is safe and improves renal function, without cardiac compromise.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Randomized trial of 3 maintenance regimens (TAC/SRL vs. TAC/MMF vs. CSA/SRL) with low-dose corticosteroids in primary kidney transplantation: 18-year results

A randomized trial of 150 primary kidney transplant recipients, initiated in May 2000, compared tacrolimus (TAC)/sirolimus (SRL) vs. TAC/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs. cyclosporine microemulsion (CSA)/SRL (N = 50/group). All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. With current median follow-up of 18 years post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred less often in TAC/MMF (26% (13/50)), vs. the TAC/SRL (36% (18/50)) and CSA/SRL (34% (17/50)) arms combined (p = .23), with statistical significance favoring TAC/MMF (p = .05) after controlling for the multivariable (Cox model) effects of recipient age, recipient race/ethnicity, and donor age. First BPAR rate was clearly more favorable for TAC/MMF after stratifying patients by having 0–1 (N = 72) vs. 2–3 (N = 78) unfavorable baseline characteristics (recipient age <50 years, African American or Hispanic recipient, and donor age ≥50 years) (p = .02). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the CKD-EPI formula, was consistently higher for TAC/MMF, particularly after controlling for the multivariable effect of donor age, throughout the first 96 months post-transplant (p ≤ .008). These differences were translated into an observed more favorable graft failure due to immunologic cause (CAI/TG) rate for TAC/MMF (p = .06), although no significant differences in overall death-uncensored graft loss were observed. Previously reported significantly higher study drug discontinuation and requirement for antilipid therapy rates in the SRL-assigned arms were maintained over time. Overall, these results at 18 years post-transplant more definitively show that TAC/MMF should be the gold standard for achieving optimal, long-term maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.     

Long-term outcome of sirolimus rescue in kidney-pancreas transplantation

Sirolimus (SRL) rescue in kidney-pancreas transplantation has not been well described. We reviewed 112 KPTxs performed at our institution between December 3, 1995 and June 27, 2002. All patients received antibody induction, tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. In 35 patients, SRL was substituted for MMF for the following reasons: acute rejection (AR) of kidney or pancreas despite adequate TAC levels, MMF intolerance, increasing creatinine levels, and TAC-induced hyperglycemia. Three-year kidney and pancreas graft survivals were 97% and 90%, respectively. Of 10 patients who were switched to SRL because of AR, one kidney failed because of antibody-resistant AR, and one kidney developed borderline AR; the other eight patients remain AR-free. AR developed in seven other patients despite therapeutic SRL levels; six had TAC levels less than 4.5 ng/mL. The mean creatinine levels overall and for the group with increasing creatinine remained stable. All patients who were switched to SRL for TAC-induced hyperglycemia or MMF intolerance improved. Kidney-pancreas transplant recipients can be safely switched to SRL with excellent graft and patient survival.     

Lack of Benefit of Early Protocol Biopsies in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving TAC and MMF: A Randomized Study

We conducted a randomized, multicenter study to determine whether treatment of subclinical rejection with increased corticosteroids resulted in beneficial outcomes in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. One hundred and twenty-one patients were randomized to biopsies at 0,1,2,3 and 6 months (Biopsy arm), and 119 to biopsies at 0 and 6 months only (Control arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the prevalence of the sum of the interstitial and tubular scores (ci + ct)> 2 (Banff) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included clinical and subclinical rejection and renal function. At 6 months, 34.8% of the Biopsy and 20.5% of the Control arm patients had a ci + ct score >or= 2 (p = 0.07). Between months 0 and 6, clinical rejection episodes were 12 in 10 Biopsy arm patients and 8 in 8 Control arm patients (p = 0.44). Overall prevalence of subclinical rejection in the Biopsy arm was 4.6%. Creatinine clearance at 6 months was 72.9 +/- 21.7 in the Biopsy and 68.90 mL/min +/- 18.35 mL/min in the Control arm patients (p = 0.18). In conclusion, we found no benefit to the procurement of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC, MMF and prednisone, at least in the short term. This is likely due to their low prevalence of subclinical rejection.     

Long-term renal allograft function on a tacrolimus-based, pred-free maintenance immunosuppression comparing sirolimus vs. MMF.

It is not known how different steroid-free immunosuppressive combinations affect renal graft survival and long-term kidney transplant function. Here we sought to compare the impact on graft survival and long-term graft function of two tacrolimus (Tac)-based, prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocols: Tac/Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) vs. Tac/Sirolimus (SRL). Renal transplant patients given induction therapy with IL2-RA and methylprednisolone on days 0, 1 and 2 post-transplant were prospectively randomized to two maintenance immunosuppressive regimens with Tac/MMF (n = 45) or Tac/SRL (n = 37). During the 3-year follow-up the following data were collected: patient survival, renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at different time-points post-transplant. Cumulative graft survival was significantly different in the two groups: one kidney loss in the Tac/MMF vs. six kidney losses in the Tac/SRL (log-rank test p = 0.04). GFR at different time-points post-transplant was consistently and statistically better in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. The slope of GFR decline per month was flatter in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. This study showed that renal graft survival and graft function were significantly lower in the combination of Tac/SRL than Tac/MMF.     

Risk factors for wound healing complications in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients

Impaired surgical site healing occurs in 20% to 50% of sirolimus (SRL)-treated renal transplant (RT) recipients, with most patients having received concomitant corticosteroids. We determined the incidence of surgical site complications among RT recipients receiving SRL with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with most patients on a steroid-avoidance protocol. SRL/MMF patients with complications within 3 months of transplantation were compared with 1) SRL/MMF patients without them and 2) matched RT recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK)/MMF. Between January 2002 and March 2005, 44 of 300 (15%) RT recipients received SRL within 6 weeks of transplantation. Fourteen (31.8%) developed lymphocele, bladder leak, wound dehiscence, cellulitis, or an abscess. Obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m2) was significantly associated with problems: the mean BMI of SRL cases with complications was 29.9 kg/m2 vs 25.4 kg/m2 for SRL patients without them (P = .047). Seventy-one percent of obese SRL patients experienced complications compared with 24.3% (P = .025) of non-obese SRL patients. Surgical treatment was required in 29% of patients. Rates of maintenance steroid use were similar in SRL complicated cases compared with SRL patients without them. The FK control group showed a lower rate of complications (14.3%; P = .163) despite similar BMI, rejection rates, and chronic steroid use as the SRL group. Obesity and graft rejection were independent predictors of complications. Thus, among a group of predominantly steroid-free recipients on SRL, the rates of wound complications were similar to those seen previously, but the highest risk for them was observed in obese recipients and in those with acute rejection episodes. Wound complications were associated with significant morbidity.