Inhibition of lipolysis during acute GH exposure increases insulin sensitivity in previously untreated GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies evaluating the lipolytic effect of GH have in general been performed in subjects on chronic GH therapy. In this study we assessed the lipolytic effect of GH in previously untreated patients and examined whether the negative effect of enhanced lipolysis on glucose metabolism could be counteracted by acute antilipolysis achieved with acipimox. METHODS: Ten GH-deficient (GHD) adults participated in four experiments each, during which they received in a double-blind manner: placebo (A); GH (0.88+/-0.13 mg) (B); GH+acipimox 250 mg b.i.d. (C); and acipimox b.i.d. (no GH) (D), where GH was given the night before a 2 h euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose and indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: GH increased basal free fatty acid (FFA) levels by 74% (P=0.0051) and insulin levels by 93% (P=0.0051). This resulted in a non-significant decrease in insulin-stimulated glucose uptakes (16.61+/-8.03 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min (s.d.), P=0.07 for A vs B). The rates of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake correlated negatively with the FFA concentrations (r=-0.638, P<0.0001). However, acipimox caused a significant improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the GH-treated patients (17.35+/-5.65 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min, P=0.012 for C vs B). The acipimox-induced enhancement of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was mainly due to an enhanced rate of glucose oxidation (8.32+/-3.00 vs 5.88+/-2.39 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for C vs B). The enhanced rates of glucose oxidation induced by acipimox correlated negatively with the rate of lipid oxidation in GH-treated subjects both in basal (r=-0.867, P=0.0093) and during insulin-stimulated (r=-0.927, P=0.0054) conditions. GH did not significantly impair non-oxidative glucose metabolism (6.86+/-5.22 vs 8.67+/-6.65 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A). The fasting rate of endogenous glucose production was unaffected by GH and acipimox administration (10.99+/-1.98 vs 11.73+/-2.38 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A and 11.55+/-2.7 vs 10.99+/-1.98 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for C vs B). On the other hand, acipimox alone improved glucose uptake in the untreated GHD patients (24.14+/-8.74 vs 16.61+/-8.03 micromol/kg per min, P=0.0077 for D vs A) and this was again due to enhanced fasting (7.90+/-2.68 vs 5.16+/-2.28 micromol/kg per min, P=0.01 for D vs A) and insulin-stimulated (9.78+/-3.68 vs 7.95+/-2.64 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for D vs A) glucose oxidation. CONCLUSION: The study of acute administration of GH to previously untreated GHD patients provides compelling evidence that (i) GH-induced insulin resistance is mainly due to induction of lipolysis by GH; and (ii) inhibition of lipolysis can prevent the deterioration of insulin sensitivity. The question remains whether GH replacement therapy should, at least at the beginning of therapy, be combined with means to prevent an excessive stimulation of lipolysis by GH.     

The control on growth hormone release by free fatty acids is maintained in acromegaly

Free fatty acids (FFA) physiologically regulate GH release via a negative feedback. The aim of this study was to examine whether such feedback is preserved in acromegaly, a condition in which alterations in other regulatory mechanisms of GH release occur. Eight acromegalic patients (group 1: five women and three men, 43.0 +/- 4.2 yr old, mean +/- SE) received per os on two different days, at a 3 day-interval, in a random order, placebo or 250 mg of acipimox, an inhibitor of lipolysis analogous to nicotinic acid, at 0700 and 1100 h. In both tests GHRH (1-29 NH2), 50 microg, was administered i.v. at 1300 h. Blood samples for GH, FFA, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and glucose were taken from 0900 to 1500 h, and the time period considered for statistical analysis was 1200-1500 h, representative of steady-state condition for FFA, IRI, and glucose. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly lower after acipimox than after placebo (0.05 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.01). In contrast, both mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) and the mean GH response to GHRH (GH delta area, 1300-1500 h) were significantly higher after acipimox than after placebo (12.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 1.2 microg/L, P < 0.01; 2937 +/- 959 vs. 1154 +/- 432 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). The increase in both basal GH levels and GH delta area occurred in all eight patients. Acipimox also reduced mean serum IRI (83 +/- 12 vs. 112 +/- 14 pmol/L) and blood glucose (5.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) levels, as compared with placebo (P < 0.03 or less). Eight acromegalic patients (group 2: six women and two men, 46.6 +/- 5.7 yr old) underwent a constant i.v. 10% lipid infusion (150 mL/h), started at 0900 h and continued until 1500 h. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly higher during lipid infusion than after placebo (0.27 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.02); in contrast, mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) were reduced by lipid infusion, as compared with placebo (9.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.6 +/- 4.4 microg/L, P < 0.01), and the same occurred for the GH delta area after GHRH (2498 +/- 1643 vs. 4512 +/- 1988 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). Serum IRI and blood glucose levels were similar after placebo and during lipid infusion. These data indicate that, in acromegaly, the acute reduction of circulating FFA levels results in increased GH release, whereas the increase in circulating FFA levels is accompanied by a reduced GH release. Taken together, these findings suggest that, in acromegaly, the control of FFA on GH release is preserved.     

Effects of growth hormone administration on protein dynamics and substrate metabolism during 4 weeks of dietary restriction in obese women

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of obesity with very low calorie diet (VLCD) is complicated by protein loss. We evaluated the effects of coadministration of GH on protein turnover, substrate metabolism, and body composition in VLCD treated obesity. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Fifteen obese women underwent 4 weeks of very low calorie diet (VLCD) in parallel with GH treatment (n = 7) or placebo (n = 8). MEASUREMENTS: Protein metabolism and total glucose turnover were isotopically assayed. Plasma concentrations of amino acids were determined by an HPLC system. Estimated rates of lipid and glucose oxidation were obtained by indirect calorimetry. Fat free mass was determined by DEXA-scan. RESULTS: Protein breakdown decreased in both groups (tyrosine flux micromol/h): -12% +/- 3 (GH) vs. - 9% +/- 3 (placebo)). Phenylalanine degradation in relation to phenylalanine concentration decreased by 9% in the GH group, whereas an increase of 8% was observed in the placebo group (P = 0.1). Plasma concentrations of several amino acids were significantly decreased in the placebo group, while urea excretion decreased in the GH group. A decrease in FFM was found in placebo treated patients (2.14% +/- 1.9 (GH) vs. - 3.54% +/- 1.6 (placebo), P < 0.05). Rates of lipid oxidation tended to be increased by GH treatment (lipid oxidation (mg/minutes): 79.7 +/- 5.9 (GH) vs. 64.6 +/- 5.9 (placebo), P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: During dietary restriction GH primarily seems to conserve protein by a reduced hepatic degradation of amino acids.     

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) substitution during fasting in GH-deficient patients decreases urea excretion and conserves protein synthesis.

The consequences of GH deficiency during conditions in which endogenous GH release is acutely stimulated are largely unknown. Short-term fasting constitutes a robust GH stimulus, but the metabolic significance of GH during fasting is uncertain. To address both of these issues, we therefore evaluated the effect of GH on substrate metabolism during fasting in adults with GH deficiency. Seven hypopituitary GH-deficient patients were each studied twice during a 40-h fast: once with GH replacement continued and once with GH discontinued during the fast. After 40 h of fasting, protein synthesis and turnover were higher with than without GH replacement [phenylalanine incorporation (micromol/kg fat free mass/h): 36.6 +/- 1.2 (GH) vs. 32.8 +/- 1.4, P < 0.05; phenylalanine flux (micromol/kg fat free mass/h): 41.3 +/- 1.0 (GH) vs. 38.0 +/- 1.8, P < 0.05]. During continued GH replacement, urea excretion decreased during nighttime [urea excretion (mmol/24 h): 269 +/- 51 (GH) vs. 390 +/- 69, P < 0.05], and a significant decline in urea-N synthesis rate was found [urea-N synthesis rate (mmol/h): 14.7 +/- 1.6 (GH) vs. 21.1 +/- 2.2, P < 0.01]. GH replacement was associated with increased lipid oxidation [lipid oxidation (mg/kg per min): 0.91 +/- 0.07 (GH) vs. 0.70 +/- 0.03, P < 0.05]. Finally, continuation of GH induced moderate elevations in plasma glucose levels without significant changes in total glucose turnover or oxidation. In summary, continued GH substitution during fasting conserves nitrogen, which involves stimulation or maintenance of protein synthesis. Our data support the importance of GH replacement in hypopituitary adults.     

Abnormalities of whole body protein turnover, muscle metabolism and levels of metabolic hormones in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with insulin resistance and cachexia, but little is known about the underlying substrate metabolism. The present study was undertaken to identify disturbances of basal glucose, lipid and protein metabolism. DESIGN: We studied eight nondiabetic patients with CHF (ejection fraction 30 +/- 4%) and eight healthy controls. Protein metabolism (whole body and regional muscle fluxes) and total glucose turnover were isotopically assayed. Substrate oxidation were obtained by indirect calorimetry. The metabolic response to exercise was studied by bicycle ergometry exercise. RESULTS: Our data confirm that CHF patients have a decreased lean body mass. CHF patients are characterised by (i) decreased glucose oxidation [glucose oxidation (mg kg(-1) min(-1)): 1.25 +/- 0.09 (patients) vs. 1.55 +/- 0.09 (controls), P < 0.01] and muscle glucose uptake [a - v diff(glucose) (micromol L(-1)): -10 +/- 25 (patients) vs. 70 +/- 22 (controls), P < 0.01], (ii) elevated levels of free fatty acids (FFA) [FFA (mmol L(-1)): 0.72 +/- 0.05 (patients) vs. 0.48 +/- 0.03 (controls), P < 0.01] and 3-hydroxybutyrate and signs of elevated fat oxidation and muscle fat utilization [a - v diff(FFA) (mmol L(-1)): 0.12 +/- 0.02 (patients) vs. 0.05 +/- 0.01 (controls), P < 0.05] and (iii) elevated protein turnover and protein breakdown [phenylalanine flux (micromol kg(-1) h(-1)): 36.4 +/- 1.5 (patients) vs. 29.6 +/- 1.3 (controls), P < 0.01]. Patients had high circulating levels of noradrenaline, glucagon, and adiponectin, and low levels of ghrelin. We failed to observe any differences in metabolic responses between controls and patients during short-term exercise. CONCLUSIONS: In the basal fasting state patients with CHF are characterized by several metabolic abnormalities which may contribute to CHF pathophysiology and may provide a basis for targeted intervention.     

Acute regulation of adiponectin by free fatty acids

Little is known about the acute regulation of adiponectin in humans. In animal studies, adiponectin increases the clearance of free fatty acids (FFA) from the circulation by increasing skeletal uptake and oxidation of lipid, thereby regulating the FFA concentration. However, it is unknown if FFA regulate adiponectin. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of an acute reduction in free fatty acids on adiponectin concentration in healthy subjects. Ten normal male subjects were admitted for 2 inpatient visits and randomized to receive either acipimox (500 mg orally at 2 am and again at 6 am) or placebo on the first visit and vice versa on the second visit. Adiponectin, FFA, insulin and glucose were measured at 7:45 am. FFA concentrations were significantly lower after acipimox than placebo administration (0.08 +/- 0.02 mEq/L v 0.35 +/- 0.53 mEq/L, P <.05). Adiponectin concentrations were also significantly lower after acipimox than placebo administration (7.4 +/- 1.2 microg/mL v 10.3 +/- 1.7 microg/mL, P <.05). The change in FFA between acipimox and placebo correlated significantly with the change in adiponectin (r = 0.66, P <.05), eg, the larger the reduction in FFA in response to acipimox, the larger the reduction in adiponectin. These results suggest that acute lowering of FFA is associated with decreased adiponectin concentrations.     

Modulation of basal glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity by growth hormone and free fatty acids during short-term fasting

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The metabolic response to fasting involves an increase in circulating levels of growth hormone (GH) and free fatty acids, and resistance to insulin's actions on glucose metabolism. Stimulation of lipolysis and insulin resistance are well-described effects of GH. The present study was designed to test the degree to which the insulin antagonistic effects of GH on glucose metabolism are mediated through stimulation of lipolysis during fasting. METHODS: Seven normal subjects were examined on three occasions during a 40-h fast with infusion of somatostatin, insulin and glucagon for the final 18 h: (expt. i) with GH replacement, (expt. ii) with GH replacement and antilipolysis with acipimox, and (expt. iii) without GH and with antilipolysis. RESULTS: Basal glucose turnover was significantly reduced by addition of acipimox (rate of disappearance (Rd) glucose (mg/kg/min): 1.91+/-0.08 (expt. i), 1.69+/-0.05 (expt. ii), 1.61+/-0.08 (expt. iii); P<0.01), whereas insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was significantly increased (glucose infusion rate (M-value) (mg/kg/min): 1.66+/-0.22 (expt. i), 2.47+/-0.10 (expt. ii), 2.00+/-0.31 (expt. iii); P<0.05). Addition of GH during inhibition of lipolysis failed to affect basal and insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism significantly. CONCLUSION: Thus, the present data provide strong evidence that the insulin antagonistic effects of GH on fasting glucose metabolism are causally linked to concomitant stimulation of lipolysis.     

Effects of GH replacement therapy in adults on serum levels of leptin and ghrelin: the role of lipolysis

OBJECTIVE: The regulation and function of systemic ghrelin levels appear to be associated with food intake and energy balance rather than GH. Since GH, in turn, acutely induces lipolysis and insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, we aimed to study the isolated and combined effects of GH, free fatty acids (FFAs) and insulin sensitivity on circulating ghrelin levels in human subjects. DESIGN: Seven GH-deficient patients (aged 37 +/- 4 years (mean +/- s.e.)) were studied on four occasions in a 2 x 2 factorial design with and without GH substitution and with and without administration of acipimox, which lowers FFA levels by inhibition of the hormone-sensitive lipase, in the basal state and during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. RESULTS: Serum FFA levels decreased with acipimox administration irrespective of GH status. The GH-induced reduction in insulin sensitivity was countered by acipimox. Fasting ghrelin levels decreased insignificantly during GH administration alone, but were reduced by 33% during co-administration of GH and acipimox (Aci) (in ng/l): 860 +/- 120 (-GH - Aci), 711 +/- 130 (-GH + Aci), 806 +/- 130 (+GH - Aci), 574 +/- 129 (+GH + Aci), P < 0.01. The clamp was associated with a further, moderate lowering of ghrelin. GH and acipimox induced a reciprocal 25% increase in serum leptin levels (microg/l): 11.2 +/- 4.4 (-GH - Aci), 11.7 +/- 4.4 (-GH + Aci), 11.5 +/- 4.4 (+GH - Aci), 13.9 +/- 4.2 (+GH + Aci), P = 0.005. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that antilipolysis via suppression of the hormone-sensitive lipase in combination with GH administration is associated with significant and reciprocal changes in ghrelin and leptin.     

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: impact on insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism

The appropriate management of GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood has not been reported in controlled trials, even though there is evidence to suggest that this phase is associated with specific problems in relation to GH sensitivity. An issue of particular interest is the impact of GH substitution on insulin sensitivity, which normally declines during puberty. We, therefore, evaluated insulin sensitivity (euglycemic glucose clamp) and substrate metabolism in 18 GH-deficient patients (6 females and 12 males; age, 20 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 25 +/- 1 kg/m2) in a placebo-controlled, parallel study. Measurements were made at baseline, where all patients were on their regular GH replacement, after 12 months of either continued GH (0.018 +/- 0.001 mg/kg day) or placebo, and finally after 12 months of open phase GH therapy (0.016 mg/kg x day). Before study entry GH deficiency was reconfirmed by a stimulation test. During the double-blind phase, insulin sensitivity and fat mass tended to increase in the placebo group [deltaM-value (mg/kg x min), -0.7 +/- 1.1 (GH) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.8 (placebo), P = 0.18; deltaTBF (kg), 0.9 +/- 1.2 (GH) vs. 4.4 +/- 1.6 (placebo), P = 0.1]. Rates of lipid oxidation decreased [delta lipid oxidation (mg/kg x min), 0.02 +/- 0.14 (GH) vs. -0.32 +/- 0.13 (placebo), P < 0.05], whereas glucose oxidation increased in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.05). In the open phase, a decrease in insulin sensitivity was found in the former placebo group, although they lost body fat and increased fat-free mass [M-value (mg/kg x min), 5.1 +/- 0.7 (placebo) vs. 3.4 +/- 1.0 (open), P = 0.09]. In the group randomized to continued GH treatment almost all hormonal and metabolic parameters remained unchanged during the study. In conclusion, 1) discontinuation of GH therapy for 1 yr in adolescent patients induces fat accumulation without compromising insulin sensitivity; and 2) the beneficial effects of continued GH treatment on body composition in terms of decrease in fat mass and increase in fat-free mass does not fully balance the direct insulin antagonistic effects.     

The decisive role of free fatty acids for protein conservation during fasting in humans with and without growth hormone

During fasting, a lack of GH increases protein loss by close to 50%, but the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. The present study tests the hypothesis that the anabolic actions of GH depend on mobilization of lipids. Seven normal subjects were examined on four occasions during a 37-h fast with infusion of somatostatin, insulin, and glucagon for the final 15 h: 1) with GH replacement, 2) with GH replacement and antilipolysis with acipimox, 3) without GH and with antilipolysis, and 4) with GH replacement, antilipolysis, and infusion of intralipid. Urinary urea excretion, serum urea concentrations, and muscle protein breakdown (assessed by labeled phenylalanine) increased by almost 50% during fasting with suppression of lipolysis. Addition of GH during fasting with antilipolysis did not influence indexes of protein degradation, whereas restoration of high FFA levels regenerated proportionally low concentrations of urea and decreased whole body protein degradation (phenylalanine to tyrosine conversion) by 10-15%, but failed to affect muscle protein metabolism. Thus, the present data provide strong evidence that FFA are important protein-sparing agents during fasting. The finding that inhibition of lipolysis eliminates the ability of GH to restrict fasting protein loss indicates that stimulation of lipolysis is the principal protein-conserving mechanism of GH.     

Inhibition of the rise in FFA by Acipimox partially prevents GH-induced insulin resistance in GH-deficient adults.

To test the hypothesis that GH-induced insulin resistance is mediated by an increase in FFA levels we assessed insulin sensitivity after inhibiting the increase in FFA by a nicotine acid derivative, Acipimox, in nine GH-deficient adults receiving GH replacement therapy. The patients received in a double blind fashion either Acipimox (500 mg) or placebo before a 2-h euglycemic (plasma glucose, 5.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/liter) hyperinsulinemic (serum insulin, 28.7 +/- 6.3 mU/liter) clamp in combination with indirect calorimetry and infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose. Acipimox decreased fasting FFA by 88% (P = 0.012) and basal lipid oxidation by 39% (P = 0.015) compared with placebo. In addition, the insulin-stimulated lipid oxidation was 31% (P = 0.0077) lower during Acipimox than during placebo. Acipimox increased insulin-stimulated total glucose uptake by 36% (P = 0.021) compared with placebo, which mainly was due to a 47% (P = 0.015) increase in glucose oxidation. GH induced insulin resistance is partially prevented by inhibition of lipolysis by Acipimox.     

Short-term treatment with low doses of recombinant human GH stimulates lipolysis in visceral obese men

This study was designed to explore whether low doses of recombinant human (rh)GH affect lipid, glucose, or protein metabolism in men with visceral obesity. Four different studies were performed in six, otherwise healthy, obese men (age, 42 +/- 3; body mass index, 33 +/- 1 kg/m(2); waist circumference, 111 +/- 3 cm; mean +/- SEM). Lipid, glucose, and protein kinetics was estimated by infusing stable isotopes (glycerol, glucose, leucine) in the basal state and after 1 wk of treatment with sc bedtime injections of either placebo, 2.5 (GH2.5), or 3.3 (GH3.3) microg rhGH/kg body weight per day. When compared with baseline, placebo had no effect on lipid, glucose, or protein fluxes. In contrast, GH2.5 and GH3.3 increased lipolysis by approximately 25% (P < 0.04) without changing glucose and protein turnover rates. The two rhGH treatments increased within the normal range serum IGF-I (by approximately 30%; P < 0.01), whereas they augmented insulin secretion (P < 0.04) in a dose-dependent manner (GH2.5 by 19%, GH3.3 by 37%). C-peptide secretion was increased (P = 0.01) only by GH3.3 (by 28%). In conclusion, 1 wk of treatment with low doses of rhGH is sufficient to increase lipolysis in visceral obese men, but it does not modify glucose and protein turnover rates. The results of this study provide the rationale to design clinical trials using low doses of rhGH to attempt to reduce fat mass.     

Effect of acute pharmacological modulation of plasma free fatty acids on GH secretion in acromegalic patients

OBJECTIVES: In acromegaly GH secretion is markedly increased due in most cases to a GH secreting pituitary adenoma. GH secretion is modulated by variations in the levels of free fatty acids (FFA). Recent studies in different clinical situations, have shown that reduction in FFA with acipimox (A) modifies somatotroph cell responsiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute pharmacological reduction of plasma FFA on both basal GH levels and GHRH-mediated GH secretion in acromegalic patients. PATIENTS: Six acromegalic patients (four female, two male) aged 57 +/- 4 years., with active disease due to pituitary adenomas were studied. Four of the patients had been treated previously by surgery and/or radiotherapy. The diagnosis of active acromegaly was established by clinical assessment, increased serum IGF-I and impaired GH suppression after oral glucose. MEASUREMENTS: Four tests were performed: placebo, A (250 mg, orally, - 210 minutes and - 60 minutes), GHRH (100 microg, iv, 0 minutes) and GHRH plus A. The different tests on each subject were performed in random order one week apart, each subject served as their own control. Serum GH was measured by RIA at appropriate intervals. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal METHOD: Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The administration of A induced a FFA reduction during the entire test both when administered with placebo and with GHRH: AUC (mmol/l x 90 minutes): placebo plus placebo: 88.2 +/- 7.3. Placebo plus A: 23.2 +/- 4.6 (P < 0.05). Placebo plus GHRH: 85.4 +/- 6.9. A plus GHRH: 21.8 +/- 3.8 (P < 0.05). Mean peak GH level (microg/l) after placebo plus placebo was 5.0 +/- 1.8 not significantly different than after placebo plus A with a mean peak of 6.2 +/- 2 (P = ns). Mean peak GHRH-induced GH secretion was 26.0 +/- 15.4 and was not modified by previous A administration with mean peak of 24.4 +/- 11.8 (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients acute pharmacological reduction of FFA with acipimox did not modify basal GH levels or GHRH-induced GH secretion, suggesting that the adenomatous somatotroph cell is unresponsive to physiological signals such as FFA which act at a pituitary level. These data support the hypothesis of an intrinsic neoplastic pituitary defect for the pathogenesis of acromegaly.     

Effects of morning cortisol replacement on glucose and lipid metabolism in GH-treated subjects

OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance is a frequent consequence of GH replacement therapy but patients on GH replacement therapy often also have replacement of other hormone deficiencies which theoretically could modify the metabolic effects of GH. In particular, cortisol replacement if given in supra physiologic doses immediately before the evaluation of insulin sensitivity could influence insulin sensitivity. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the effect of morning cortisol replacement given prior to a euglycaemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose and indirect calorimetry on glucose and lipid metabolism. METHODS: Ten GH/ACTH-deficient adults received, in a double-blind manner, either cortisol (A) or placebo (B) before the clamp whereas five GH-deficient-ACTH-sufficient adults participated in a control (C) clamp experiment. All subjects received GH replacement therapy. RESULTS: Serum cortisol levels were significantly higher after cortisol than after placebo (324+/-156 vs 132+/-136 mmol/l; P=0.006) and similar to controls (177+/-104 mmol/l). As a measure of the biological effect of cortisol, eosinophil leukocyte counts in peripheral blood decreased (164+/-91 x 10(9)/l vs 216+/-94 x 10(9)/l; P=0.04). Cortisol replacement had no significant effect on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (11.8+/-1.8 vs 13.2+/-3.9 micromol/kg min), either on glucose oxidation or on glucose storage. There was also no significant effect of cortisol on fasting endogenous glucose production and no effect was seen on serum free fatty acid concentrations. CONCLUSION: Administration of cortisol in the morning before a clamp cannot explain the insulin resistance seen with GH replacement therapy.     

Growth hormone replacement therapy induces insulin resistance by activating the glucose-fatty acid cycle

The effects of GH replacement therapy on energy metabolism are still uncertain, and long-term benefits of increased muscle mass are thought to outweigh short-term negative metabolic effects. This study was designed to address this issue by examining both short-term (1 wk) and long-term (6 months) effects of a low-dose (9.6 micro g/kg body weight.d) GH replacement therapy or placebo on whole-body glucose and lipid metabolism (oral glucose tolerance test and euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with indirect calorimetry and infusion of 3-[(3)H]glucose) and on muscle composition and muscle enzymes/metabolites, as determined from biopsies obtained at the end of the clamp in 19 GH-deficient adult subjects. GH therapy resulted in impaired insulin-stimulated glucose uptake at 1 wk (-52%; P = 0.008) and 6 months (-39%; P = 0.008), which correlated with deterioration of glucose tolerance (r = -0.481; P = 0.003). The decrease in glucose uptake was associated with an increase in lipid oxidation at 1 wk (60%; P = 0.008) and 6 months (60%; P = 0.008) and a concomitant decrease in glucose oxidation. The deterioration of glucose metabolism during GH therapy also correlated with the enhanced rate of lipid oxidation (r = -0.508; P = 0.0002). In addition, there was a shift toward more glycolytic type II fibers during GH therapy. In conclusion, replacement therapy with a low-dose GH in GH-deficient adult subjects is associated with a sustained deterioration of glucose metabolism as a consequence of the lipolytic effect of GH, resulting in enhanced oxidation of lipid substrates. Also, a shift toward more insulin-resistant type II X fibers is seen in muscle. Glucose metabolism should be carefully monitored during long-term GH replacement therapy.     

Free fatty acids inhibit the glucose-stimulated increase of intramuscular glucose-6-phosphate concentration in humans

To test Randle's hypothesis we examined whether free fatty acids (FFAs) affect glucose-stimulated glucose transport/phosphorylation and allosteric mediators of muscle glucose metabolism under conditions of fasting peripheral insulinemia. Seven healthy men were studied during somatostatin-glucose-insulin clamp tests [plasma insulin, 50 pmol/L; plasma glucose, 5 mmol/L (0-180 min), 10 mmol/L (180-300 min)] in the presence of low (0.05 mmol/L) and increased (2.6 mmol/L) plasma FFA concentrations. (31)P and (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to determine intracellular concentrations of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), inorganic phosphate, phosphocreatine, ADP, pH, and intramyocellular lipids. Rates of glucose turnover were measured using D-[6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose. Plasma FFA elevation reduced rates of glucose uptake at the end of the euglycemic period (R(d 150-180 min): 8.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 12.6 +/- 1.6 micromol/kg.min, P < 0.05) and during hyperglycemia (R(d 270-300 min): 9.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 22.3 +/- 1.7 micromol/kg.min, P < 0.01). Similarly, intramuscular G6P was lower at the end of both euglycemic (G6P(167-180 min): -22 +/- 7 vs. +24 +/- 7 micromol/L, P < 0.05) and hyperglycemic periods (G6P(287-300 min): -7 +/- 9 vs. +28 +/- 7 micromol/L, P < 0.05). Changes in intracellular inorganic phosphate exhibited a similar pattern, whereas FFA did not affect phosphocreatine, ADP, pH, and intramyocellular lipid contents. In conclusion, the lack of an increase in muscular G6P along with reduction of whole body glucose clearance indicates that FFA might directly inhibit glucose transport/phosphorylation in skeletal muscle.     

Short- and long-term effects of growth hormone (GH) replacement on protein metabolism in GH-deficient adults

Reduced fat-free mass (FFM) in GH-deficient (GHD) adults is improved by GH replacement, but the protein metabolic changes are unclear. Using iv [(2)H(3)]leucine and oral l-[(13)C(1)]leucine infusions and dual emission x-ray absorptiometry, we compared leucine kinetics and body composition in eight GHD adults and eight healthy controls in the fasted and fed states, before and after 2 wk and 6 months of GH replacement. Leucine kinetics were not different between pretreatment GHD subjects and controls. After 2 wk of GH treatment, leucine oxidation decreased in the GHD subjects compared with baseline values [fasted, 41 +/- 6 vs. 30 +/- 5 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 49 +/- 3 vs. 41 +/- 3.6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)], leucine balance improved [fasted, -14 +/- 4 vs. -3.5 +/- 3 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 65 +/- 10 vs. 72 +/- 7 micromol/kg FFM.h (P = 0.07)], and protein synthesis increased [fasted, 116 +/- 5 vs. 131 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05); fed, 103 +/- 6 vs. 116 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)]. After 6 months of GH treatment, these changes were not maintained in the fed state. The five GHD subjects with decreased FFM at baseline showed a significant increase after 6 months of GH treatment (P < 0.05). GH replacement in GHD acutely improves protein balance by stimulating synthesis and inhibiting catabolism. After 6 months, protein kinetics reached a new homeostasis to maintain the net gain in FFM.     

Metabolic effect of decreasing nonesterified fatty acid levels with acipimox in hyperthyroid patients.

Glucose intolerance is often found in patients with hyperthyroidism, but the pathogenetic mechanisms are not fully understood. Since lipolysis is increased in hyperthyroidism, elevated plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) may contribute to abnormal glucose metabolism in hyperthyroidism. The aim of this study was to investigate whether decreasing the plasma NEFA level with acipimox can affect glucose metabolism in hyperthyroidism. We performed an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) with acipimox 250 mg or placebo in six untreated hyperthyroid men and six age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Fasting plasma NEFA levels were significantly higher in the hyperthyroid patients versus the controls (997.0 +/- 303.4 v290.5 +/- 169.1 micromol/L, P < .001). Plasma NEFAs decreased rapidly with acipimox treatment in both controls and hyperthyroid patients. In the controls, the glucose disappearance constant (K(G)) was not different for acipimox treatment versus placebo (2.18 +/- 0.62 v 2.42 +/- 1.00% x min(-1)). In hyperthyroid patients, acipimox treatment increased the K(G) significantly compared with placebo treatment (2.44 +/- 0.84 v 1.58 +/- 0.37% x min(-1), P < .05). Changes in K(G) values with acipimox treatment were inversely correlated with changes in plasma NEFA levels (r = -.65, P < .05). Acipimox treatment increased the acute insulin response (AIR) in hyperthyroid patients (943 +/- 381 v 698 +/- 279 microU/mL x min, P < .05), whereas it did not change the AIR in controls. Changes in the AIR with acipimox treatment correlated significantly with changes in the K(G) (r = .70, P < .05). There was a weak correlation between changes in the AIR with acipimox treatment and changes in plasma NEFA levels (r = -.55, P = .06). In summary, decreasing the plasma NEFA level with acipimox in hyperthyroid patients increases both the K(G) and AIR during an IVGTT. These findings suggest that the abnormal glucose metabolism in hyperthyroidism could be attributed, at least in part, to the increase of plasma NEFA.     

Dose-response effects of free fatty acids on glucose and lipid metabolism during somatostatin blockade of growth hormone and insulin in humans

CONTEXT: GH and other stress hormones stimulate lipolysis, which may result in free fatty acid (FFA)-mediated insulin resistance. However, there are also indications that FFAs in the very low physiological range have the same effect. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to address systematically the dose-response relations between FFAs and insulin sensitivity. DESIGN: We therefore examined eight healthy men for 8 h (6 h basal and 2 h glucose clamp) on four occasions. Intervention: Intralipid was infused at varying rates (0, 3, 6, 12 microl.kg(-1).min(-1)); lipolysis was blocked by acipimox; and endogenous GH, insulin, and glucagon secretion was blocked by somatostatin and subsequently replaced at fixed rates. RESULTS: This resulted in four different FFA levels between 50 and 2000 micromol/liter, with comparable levels of insulin and counterregulatory hormones. Both in the basal state and during insulin stimulation, we saw progressively decreased glucose disposal, nonoxidative glucose disposal, and forearm muscle glucose uptake at FFA levels above 500 micromol/liter. Apart from forearm glucose uptake, the very same parameters were decreased at low FFA levels (approximately 50 micromol/liter). FFA rate of disposal was linearly related to the level of FFAs, whereas lipid oxidation reached a maximum at FFA levels approximately 1000 micromol/liter. CONCLUSION: In the presence of comparable levels of all major metabolic hormones, insulin sensitivity peaks at physiological levels of FFAs with a gradual decrease at elevated as well as suppressed FFA concentrations. These data constitute comprehensive dose-response curves for FFAs in the full physiological range from close to zero to above 2000 micromol/liter.     

Effect of acute reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), high GH basal levels and exaggerated responses to several stimuli have been described. Acipimox is an antilipolytic drug that produces an acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reduction of plasma FFA with acipimox, alone or in combination with GHRH, on GH secretion in DM1. METHODS: Six type 1 diabetic patients were studied (three women, three men), mean age of 30 +/- 2.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.1 +/- 1.5 kg/m2. As a control group, six normal healthy subjects of similar age, sex and weight were studied. Each patient and control received GHRH [1 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) at min 180], acipimox (250 mg orally at min 0 and 120) and GHRH plus acipimox on three separated days. Subjects served as their own control. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH, FFA and glucose. RESULT: In control subjects, the GH area under the curve (AUC; microg/l x 120 min) was for acipimox-treated 1339 +/- 292 and 1528 +/- 330 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 3031 +/- 669, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). In diabetic patients, the GH AUC was for acipimox-treated 2516 +/- 606 and 1821 +/- 311 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 7311 +/- 1154, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). The GH response after acipimox was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 1339 +/- 292 and 2515 +/- 606 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The GH response after acipimox plus GHRH was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 3031 +/- 669 and 7311 +/- 1154 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of free fatty acids with acipimox is a stimulus for GH secretion in DM1. The combined administration of GHRH plus acipimox induces a markedly increased GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients when compared with normal subjects. These data suggest that patients with DM1 exhibit a greater GH secretory capacity than control subjects, despite the fact that endogenous FFA levels seems to exert a greater inhibitory effect on GH secretion in these patients.