Late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients despite antiviral prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: The incidence and impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease that occurs despite CMV prophylaxis among liver transplant recipients have been incompletely defined. METHODS: The incidence and risk factors for CMV disease during the first posttransplant year in a cohort of liver transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir were retrospectively analyzed using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. RESULTS: CMV disease developed in 19 of 259 recipients (7% [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.11]) at a median of 4.5 months posttransplant, included syndrome (63%) or tissue-invasive disease (37%), and was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality during the first posttransplant year (hazard ratio 14 [95% confidence interval 3.8-54], P=0.0007). The incidence was higher (10/38 [26%] vs. 8/180 [4.5%], P<0.0001) in seronegative recipients (R-) of an organ from a seropositive donor (D+) compared with seropositive (R+) patients, respectively. D+R- status was the only variable significantly associated with CMV disease in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Late CMV disease develops in a substantial proportion of D+R- recipients after prophylaxis is discontinued, is not accurately predicted by patient factors, and is associated with increased mortality. New strategies to identify D+R- patients at risk and to reduce the incidence and impact of late CMV disease in this group are warranted.     

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies in seropositive kidney transplant recipients: an insight into current clinical practice

There is notable heterogeneity in the implementation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention practices among CMV‐seropositive (R+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. In this prospective observational study, we included 387 CMV R+ KT recipients from 25 Spanish centers. Prevention strategies (antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy) were applied according to institutional protocols at each site. The impact on the 12‐month incidence of CMV disease was assessed by Cox regression. Asymptomatic CMV infection, acute rejection, graft function, non‐CMV infection, graft loss, and all‐cause mortality were also analyzed (secondary outcomes). Models were adjusted for a propensity score (PS) analysis for receiving antiviral prophylaxis. Overall, 190 patients (49.1%) received preemptive therapy, 185 (47.8%) antiviral prophylaxis, and 12 (3.1%) no specific intervention. Twelve‐month cumulative incidences of CMV disease and asymptomatic infection were 3.6% and 39.3%, respectively. Patients on prophylaxis had lower incidence of CMV disease [PS‐adjusted HR (aHR): 0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01–0.79] and asymptomatic infection (aHR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.29–0.72) than those managed preemptively, with no significant differences according to the duration of prophylaxis. All cases of CMV disease in the prophylaxis group occurred after prophylaxis discontinuation. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a lower occurrence of CMV disease in CMV R+ KT recipients, although such benefit should be balanced with the risk of late‐onset disease.     

Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis to cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) liver transplant recipients. We assessed the outcome of this strategy by determining the incidence, clinical features, and risk factors of CMV disease among CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis. Sixty-seven CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients (mean age+/-standard deviation: 49.5+/-11.4 years; 75% male) received oral ganciclovir [n=9 (13%)] or valganciclovir [n=58 (87%)] prophylaxis for a median duration of 92 days (interquartile range: 91-100). No breakthrough CMV disease was observed during antiviral prophylaxis. However, primary CMV disease was observed in 2%, 25%, 27%, 27%, and 29% of patients at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, after antiviral prophylaxis was stopped. The incidence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease was similar between those who received oral ganciclovir and valganciclovir. Nine (47%) patients had CMV syndrome, 8 (42%) had gastrointestinal CMV disease, and 2 (11%) had CMV hepatitis. Female patients (P=0.01) and younger age at transplant (P=0.03) were associated with an increased risk, whereas diabetes mellitus (P<0.001) was significantly associated with a lower risk of delayed-onset primary CMV disease. Allograft loss or mortality occurred in 8 (12%) patients during the median follow-up period of 3.31 (range: 0.8-5.9) years. No significant association was observed between CMV disease and patient and allograft survival. In conclusion, CMV disease remains a common complication in CMV D+/R- liver transplant patients during the contemporary era of antiviral prophylaxis. Female patients and younger patients are at increased risk of delayed-onset primary CMV disease.     

Circulatory follicular helper T lymphocytes associate with lower incidence of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients

Primary infection and/or reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) favor rejection and mortality. T follicular helper cells (TFH) could contribute to protection against CMV. Circulatory TFH (cTFH) were studied pretransplant and early posttransplant in 90 CMV seropositive KTR not receiving antithymocyte globulin or antiviral prophylaxis, followed-up for 1 year. Patients who presented CMV infection had significantly lower cTFH and activated cTFH pretransplant and early posttransplant. Pretransplant activated cTFH were also lower within patients who developed CMV disease. Pre- and 14 days posttransplant activated cTFH were an independent protective factor for CMV infection (HR 0.41, p = .01; and 0.52, p = .02, respectively). KTR with low cTFH 7 days posttransplant (<11.9%) had lower CMV infection-free survival than patients with high cTFH (28.2% vs. 67.6%, p = .002). cTFH were associated with CMV-specific neutralizing antibodies (Nabs). In addition, IL-21 increased interferon-γ secretion by CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in healthy controls. Thus, we show an association between cTFH and lower incidence of CMV infection, probably through their cooperation in CMV-specific Nab production and IL-21-mediated enhancement of CD8⁺ T cell activity. Moreover, monitoring cTFH pre- and early posttransplant could improve CMV risk stratification and help select KTR catalogued at low/intermediate risk who could benefit from prophylaxis.     

Incidence and Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Disease in a Colombian Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Incidence and risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a Colombian cohort of kidney transplant recipients. CMV infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients, and its prevalence varies with economic, geographic, and ethnic factors. Among 1620 records from a Colombian reference center, CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G seroprevalence was found to be 90.9% among recipients and 90.2% among donors. In 86% (n = 264) of the cases, CMV disease occurred during the first 6 months after the transplantation, and the most frequent clinical presentation was CMV syndrome, followed by gastrointestinal disease. The following parameters were independent predictors of CMV disease: serological status of D+/R+ (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–2.63) and D+/R− (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.49–4.93), age of the recipient (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03), and receiving more than 30 mg of prednisolone by the end of the first month after transplantation (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22–2.07). Acyclovir prophylaxis or other antiviral agents significantly decreased the risk of disease (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29–0.58 and HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20–0.58, respectively). In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of CMV infection in a cohort of Latin American transplant recipients. In accord with findings from other regions, serological status is the main risk factor, prophylaxis with acyclovir is effective, and induction with alemtuzumab does not increase the risk of CMV disease.     

Cytomegalovirus transmission in mismatched solid organ transplant recipients: Are factors other than anti-viral prophylaxis at play?

Although antiviral prophylaxis has reduced cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and disease in seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (R-) receiving seropositive donor organs (D+), its impact on CMV transmission is uncertain. Transmission, defined as CMV antigenemia/CMV DNAemia and/or seroconversion by year 2, and associated demographic risk factors were studied retrospectively in 428 D+/R- and 429 D-/R- patients receiving a SOT at our center. The cumulative transmission incidence was higher for lung (90.5%) and liver recipients (85.1%) than heart (72.7%), kidney (63.9%), and pancreas (56.2%) recipients (p < .001) and was significantly lower in living (50.1%) versus deceased donor (77.4%, p < .001) kidney recipients despite identical antiviral prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, only allograft type predicted transmission risk (HR [CI] lung 1.609 [1.159, 2.234] and liver 1.644 [1.209, 2.234] vs kidney). For 53 D+ donating to >1 R- with adequate follow-up, 43 transmitted to all, three transmitted to none, and seven transmitted inconsistently with lungs and livers always transmitting but donor-matched heart, kidney or kidney-pancreas allografts sometimes not. Kidney pairs transmitted concordantly. CMV transmission risk is allograft-specific and unchanged despite antiviral prophylaxis. Tracking transmission and defining donor factors associated with transmission escape may provide novel opportunities for more targeted CMV prevention and improve outcome analysis in antiviral and vaccine trials.     

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with ganciclovir in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction antilymphocyte antibodies

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the serious viral infections after organ transplantation, especially in patients receiving anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Prevention of the infection using antiviral chemotherapy (ganciclovir) has gained interest in the transplant community due to the availability of quantitative methods for viral detection and monitoring. METHODS: Forty-six CMV seropositive kidney transplant recipients were assigned to receive induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG, Fresenius). Prophylactic intravenous ganciclovir was administered for 2 weeks at a dose of 5 mg/kg/d (adjusted to kidney function) starting from the day of surgery. Patients were monitored regularly for CMV infection or disease over 1 year posttransplant. The time to CMV manifestation, the number of antigenemia assay-positive cells, the clinical severity of infection, the incidence of acute rejection, the graft function, and the duration of hospital stay were evaluated. This group was compared to a historical matched control cohort (n = 37) transplanted earlier who did not receive prophylactic ganciclovir. RESULT: The incidence of CMV disease was significantly less among the prophylaxis than the control group (6/46 patients [13%] vs 16/37 patients [43.2%], P = <.004). The time to develop CMV manifestations was much longer in the prophylaxis group than in the control group (median 92 vs 32 days, P 相似文献   

Impact of Antiviral Preventive Strategies on the Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We assessed the impact of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy on the incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a nationwide prospective cohort of solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors associated with CMV disease and graft failure‐free survival were analyzed using Cox regression models. One thousand two hundred thirty‐nine patients transplanted from May 2008 until March 2011 were included; 466 (38%) patients received CMV prophylaxis and 522 (42%) patients were managed preemptively. Overall incidence of CMV disease was 6.05% and was linked to CMV serostatus (D+/R? vs. R+, hazard ratio [HR] 5.36 [95% CI 3.14–9.14], p < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of CMV disease was observed in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis as compared to the preemptive approach (HR 1.16 [95% CI 0.63–2.17], p = 0.63). CMV disease was not associated with a lower graft failure‐free survival (HR 1.27 [95% CI 0.64–2.53], p = 0.50). Nevertheless, patients followed by the preemptive approach had an inferior graft failure‐free survival after a median of 1.05 years of follow‐up (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.01–2.64], p = 0.044). The incidence of CMV disease in this cohort was low and not influenced by the preventive strategy used. However, patients on CMV prophylaxis were more likely to be free from graft failure.

     

Preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. METHODS: The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). CONCLUSIONS: Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus viremia associated with death or retransplantation in pediatric lung-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent complication of lung transplantation. However, there is limited information regarding the incidence and sequelae of CMV infections in pediatric lung-transplant recipients. On the basis of case series suggesting that CMV infection was associated with excess morbidity and mortality in lung-transplant recipients, we hypothesize that CMV viremia increases the risk of bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS) or death and retransplantation in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: A case-cohort study of pediatric primary lung-transplant recipients was performed. Univariate analysis was used to assess whether CMV viremia was associated with BOS or death and retransplantation within 1 year after transplantation. Patients at high risk for CMV infection received ganciclovir prophylaxis for 42 days posttransplantation. RESULTS: From July 1990 to November 2000, 194 pediatric patients received primary lung transplants. Twenty-three percent of patients developed CMV viremia. Eighty percent of CMV viremia episodes occurred before 120 days posttransplant. A first episode of CMV viremia was associated with retransplantation or death between days 90 and 365 (RR=4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-14.5) and was not associated with BOS (RR=1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: CMV viremia in the first year after pediatric primary lung transplantation is associated with increased risk of death or retransplantation between 90 and 365 days posttransplant, when CMV prophylaxis has stopped. A phase II pilot trial is warranted to assess safety and short-term efficacy of increasing the duration of CMV prophylaxis from 42 to 120 days.     

Cytomegalovirus in transplantation - challenging the status quo

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients causes both 'direct' and 'indirect' effects including allograft rejection, decreased graft and patient survival, and predisposition to opportunistic infections and malignancies. Options for CMV prevention include pre-emptive therapy, whereby anti-CMV agents are administered based on sensitive viral assays, or universal prophylaxis of all at-risk patients. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy, costs, and side effects. Standards of care for prophylaxis have not been established. METHODS: A committee of international experts was convened to review the available data regarding CMV prophylaxis and to compare preventative strategies for CMV after transplantation from seropositive donors or in seropositive recipients. RESULTS: Pre-emptive therapy requires frequent monitoring with subsequent treatment of disease and associated costs, while universal prophylaxis results in greater exposure to potential toxicities and costs of drugs. The advantages of prophylaxis include suppressing asymptomatic viremia and prevention of both direct and indirect effects of CMV infection. Meta analyses reveal decreased in mortality for patients receiving CMV prophylaxis. Costs associated with prophylaxis are less than for routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains undefined. Extended prophylaxis may improve clinical outcomes in the highest-risk patient populations including donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative renal transplants and in CMV-infected lung and heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in transplant recipients, affecting both allograft and patient survival. More studies are necessary to define optimal prophylaxis regimens.     

The economic impact of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: We studied the economic impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its effective reduction with antiviral prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. METHOD: Analysis of institutional charge data accumulated during a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing oral acyclovir 800 mg four times daily for 120 days (ACV) and intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days followed by ACV for 106 days (GCV) was performed. RESULTS: Liver transplant recipients who developed CMV disease had significantly higher charges (median: $148,300) than those who developed asymptomatic CMV infection ($119,600) or experienced no CMV infection ($114,100) (P<0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis indicated that CMV disease is associated with a 49% increase in charges, independent of other factors influencing increased hospitalization charges. In CMV-seronegative patients who received a CMV-seropositive donor organ, GCV prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in charges, as compared to ACV prophylaxis ($113,900 vs. $153,300, respectively; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantation. The use of an effective prophylactic antiviral regimen provides savings in health care resources, particularly in patients at high risk for developing CMV disease.     

Risk Factors for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients With Cytomegalovirus Antigenemia

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections, associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are known to develop in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infected transplant recipients due to the indirect effects of CMV. This study evaluated risk factors for PTLD among pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections. We reviewed the medical records of 119 patients ≤18 years old who underwent liver transplantation between September 1996 and April 2009. Sixty-six subjects (55.5%) displayed CMV antigenemia during the study period; 15 (12.6%) developed PTLD. Of these, 10 developed PTLD after CMV antigenemia. The other patients (n = 5) were excluded due to negative CMV antigenemia. The incidence of PTLD influenced by CMV infection was not significantly different from the incidence of PTLD without underlying CMV (P = .258). There were no differences in age, gender, antiviral prophylaxis, type of liver transplantation, or acute rejection episodes in the incidence of between patients with versus without PTLD. EBV but not CMV high-risk groups were a predictor for the development of PTLD (P = .035). CMV syndrome, tissue-invasive CMV disease, and CMV peak titer were not associated with an increased risk of PTLD. The primary risk factor for PTLD was EBV high-risk patients (donor positive/recipient negative). CMV disease was not associated with PTLD in pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections.     

Association of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease With Death and Graft Loss After Liver Transplant in High‐Risk Recipients

In the era of effective antiviral chemoprophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been inconsistently associated with increased mortality in liver transplant (LT) recipients. A retrospective study evaluating the association of CMV infection and disease occurring within 1 year of transplant with the endpoints of death or the combined endpoint of graft loss or death was undertaken in a cohort of 227 CMV donor seropositive, recipient seronegative first LT recipients. Associations were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. CMV infection and disease occurred in 91 (40%) and 43 (19%) patients, respectively. Forty‐eight (21%) died while 58 (26%) sustained graft loss or death. In multivariable analysis, CMV infection was associated with an increased risk of death (RR: 2.24, p = 0.008) and graft loss or death (RR: 2.85, p < 0.001). CMV disease was also associated with an increased risk of death (RR: 2.73, p = 0.003) and graft loss or death (RR: 3.04, p = 0.001). CMV infection and disease occurring within the first year after LT in high‐risk recipients is associated with increased risk of death and of graft loss or death. Investigation of strategies to further reduce the risk of CMV infection and disease in high‐risk LT recipients is warranted.     

Risk factors and impact of cytomegalovirus disease in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients in the modern era of immunosuppression and antiviral therapeutics is largely unquantified. We sought to determine the risk factors of CMV disease and its impact on SPK transplant outcomes in recipients all receiving a consistent regime of maintenance immunosuppression and CMV prophylaxis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single center study of 100 consecutive SPK transplant recipients. All received maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone. CMV prophylaxis consisted of a short course of parenteral gancyclovir followed by oral gancyclovir. Recipients at high-risk (D+/R-) for CMV also received CMV hyperimmune globulin. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for CMV disease and risk factors for adverse outcomes in SPK transplantation were determined. The effect of duration of prophylaxis on timing and severity of CMV disease in high-risk (D+/R-) SPK transplant recipients was also evaluated. RESULTS: The actual 1-year rate of CMV disease was 17.0% (12.0% noninvasive, 5.0% tissue invasive); and according to donor and recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R+: 0%; D-/R-: 2.8%; D+/R+: 25.6%; and D+/R-: 40.6%. Multivariate analysis showed transplantation of organs from a donor with positive CMV serology to be predictive of CMV disease with a relative risk of 63.37 (P=0.0052). In the high-risk (D+/R-) subgroup, the duration of prophylactic therapy delayed onset of CMV disease, but had minimal effect on severity. Invasive CMV disease was an independent predictor of mortality but did not decrease kidney or pancreas allograft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of SPK transplantation have improved in the current era of modern immunosuppression, yet CMV remains an important pathogen. The serological status of the organ donor and the duration of CMV prophylaxis are predictive of who and when CMV disease may occur. Nevertheless, new strategies that reduce risk and severity of CMV disease are still needed.     

The use of CMVIg rescue therapy in cardiothoracic transplantation: A single‐center experience over 6 years (2011‐2017)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important infectious agent in solid organ transplant recipients and has a major impact on morbidity and mortality. Most cases are well managed with antiviral agents, but CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIg) can be used alongside antiviral therapy for prophylaxis in high‐risk thoracic organ recipients and to treat life‐threatening CMV infection or disease. CMVIg may also improve antiviral host defences when genetic resistance to antivirals or unwanted side effects occur. In this single‐center, retrospective study, we reviewed the CMVIg use to supplement antiviral therapy as a “rescue therapy” in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. These comprised 12 single lung, 11 double lung, and 12 heart transplant recipients. Patients received a median of 2 doses of CMVIg, most often in combination with ganciclovir or valganciclovir, and reduced immunosuppression. One week after rescue therapy was initiated, CMV DNA levels were significantly reduced, and after four weeks, CMV DNA was undetectable in 73% patients. Only one patient died as a result of CMV‐related disease. No significant adverse effects were observed. We conclude that CMVIg rescue therapy is safe, well tolerated, and effective at controlling viral replication in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.     

Impact of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis on rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation.

With improved cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, CMV disease after liver transplantation has decreased dramatically, and patient and graft survival have improved. We examined the impact of CMV prophylaxis on biopsy proven rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation by analyzing data on 192 liver recipients over 5 years (1994-1999). Risk factors assessed for biopsy proven rejection including donor and recipient age, CMV serostatus; CMV prophylaxis; immunosuppression; bacteremia and blood product use were examined over a 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for rejection showed that bacteremia (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.39-9.36, P=0.008), donor age (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36, per 10 year increase, P=0.004), and use of cyclosporine as initial immunosuppression compared to tacrolimus (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.09, P=0.003) were associated with increased risk; ganciclovir prophylaxis for 3 months (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79, P=0.003) and recipient age (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96, for each 10 year increase, P=0.03) were associated with decreased risk. We conclude that, the use of CMV prophylaxis with ganciclovir significantly reduces the incidence of biopsy proven rejection in liver transplant recipients.     

Increased incidence of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND: The transplant literature has not shown cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease to be a significant risk factor for posttransplant cardiac complications. A large number of nontransplant studies have, however, reported an association between coronary heart disease (CHD) and CMV disease. Pathology studies have demonstrated a high incidence of CMV in atheromatous plaques from the coronary circulation. METHODS: We performed multivariate analysis to determine if posttransplant CMV disease was a significant risk factor for cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. We also performed univariate analysis to determine which cardiac complications were more common in the recipients with CMV disease. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1984 and June 30, 1997, 1859 adults underwent kidney transplants at our institution. Of these, 377 developed one of the following cardiac complications posttransplant: myocardial infarction, angina, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and angiographic vessel occlusion. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for one of the above cardiac complications were recipient age >50 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.5, P=0.0001], diabetes (OR=1.99, P=0.0001), a history of cardiac disease pretransplant (OR= 1.34, P=0.04), and CMV disease (OR=1.5, P=0.01). Univariate analysis demonstrated that recipients with CMV disease had a higher overall incidence of cardiac complications. Arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and vessel occlusion were more common in those with CMV disease. The incidence of myocardial infarction, angina, and cardiac arrest did not differ between the two groups (recipients with versus without CMV disease). CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease is associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. In our series, angiographic vessel occlusion was more common in recipients with CMV disease. This interesting finding may support the theory that CMV plays some role in the pathogenesis of CHD.     

Polyfunctional Cytomegalovirus‐Specific Immunity in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Valganciclovir Prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after lung transplant. Despite effective antiviral medications to treat CMV, invasive CMV disease contributes to lung allograft dysfunction and worse survival. Efforts to prevent CMV have led to the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis for increasingly longer periods after transplant. A pivotal concern with long‐term antiviral prophylaxis is that it may prevent or delay the development of CMV‐specific immunity and increase the subsequent risk of late onset disease. To address this issue, we conducted a pilot study to determine if CMV‐specific immunity was detectable in lung transplant recipients at risk for CMV while on antiviral prophylaxis. Utilizing polychromatic flow cytometry panels, CMV‐specific immunity was determined by peripheral blood CD4 and CD8 T cell expression of cytokines in response to the HLA restricted CMV peptides pp65 and IE‐1. We determined CMV seropositive lung transplant recipients on valganciclovir for a median of 6 months from transplant have a detectable polyfunctional CMV‐specific T cell response which is comparable to seropositive recipients not on antiviral medications and to healthy seropositive nontransplant controls. Thus, valganciclovir prophylaxis does not appear to impair the development of CMV‐specific immunity in lung transplantation.     

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulin in high-risk renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative renal allograft recipients (R-), particularly those with a graft from a CMV-seropositive donor (D+), are at high risk for primary CMV infection. CMV resistance to antiviral oral therapy is an emerging problem in renal transplantation, prompting development of new prophylactic strategies. We retrospectively studied the 1-year posttransplantation incidence of CMV infection in high-risk renal transplant recipients, in whom polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) were used as prophylaxis. Forty R- patients received immunoprophylaxis by polyvalent IVIg (0.25 g/kg weekly for 8 weeks, starting on the operative day). CMV serological tests remained negative in eight patients (20%). Eight patients (20%) had asymptomatic CMV infection while 24 (60%) developed CMV syndrome and were treated with gancyclovir (10 mg/kg/day intravenously for 3 weeks). None had CMV disease or opportunistic infection. Six patients (15%) had biopsy-proven acute rejection, which followed CMV syndrome in three cases. One-year renal allograft and patient survivals were 95% and 97.5%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine level was 124 +/- 33 micromol/L at 1 year. Clinical tolerance of IVIg was excellent, without any episode of acute renal failure. Polyvalent IVIg provides effective prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients at high risk for CMV infection and is associated with excellent 1-year allograft survival. Because of their immunomodulatory functions, IVIg may have a beneficial effect on the incidence of acute and chronic rejection and allograft survival. A randomized prospective study is required to evaluate long-term effects of CMV prophylaxis with polyvalent IVIg compared to antiviral agents in renal transplant recipients.