Lipid and protein metabolism in asthma. Effects of diet and corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND: Because little is known about the effects of asthma and asthma therapy on lipid and protein metabolism, we have investigated the characteristics of diet and plasma/serum levels of fat and protein in a group of asthma patients with various degrees of severity. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out on 118 asthma patients recruited from an outpatient clinic and 121 healthy subjects. Asthma severity was characterized in four groups according to clinical symptoms, lung-function tests, and therapy. Normal dietary intake was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire. Serum protein, albumin, and fatty acids were determined by standard methods. RESULTS: The dietary energy intake of the asthmatics was significantly lower than that of the controls. However, no differences in the body mass index were found between asthma patients and healthy subjects. There were no differences in serum/plasma levels in any of the measured biochemical parameters between healthy subjects and asthmatics. Plasma levels of protein and albumin were significantly lower in severely corticosteroid-dependent patients. There was a significant negative correlation between plasma protein (r=0.36, P<0.05) and plasma albumin levels (r=0.43, P<0.01) and the daily dose of oral corticosteroids. We did not find any differences in plasma levels of cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and fatty acids between cortico-dependent patients and those not receiving this therapy. No correlation was found between any biochemical parameters and the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that asthma induces a decrease in energy intake that does not result in a decreased body weight. Inhaled corticosteroids do not exert any metabolic effect, whereas severe asthma with regular oral corticosteroid therapy is associated with reduced plasma protein and albumin levels.     

Suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a potential systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroid therapy, can be quantified by monitoring serum, urinary, and salivary cortisol levels. OBJECTIVES: 1) Compare the effects on HPA axis of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate versus placebo and oral prednisone. 2) Estimate dose-potency ratio for HPA-axis suppression. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, 21-day trial. Active regimens were flunisolide 500 and 1,000 microg, twice daily; fluticasone propionate 110, 220, 330, and 440 microg, twice daily; and prednisone, 7.5 mg daily. Enrolled patients were nonsmokers, 18 to 50 years of age, with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma and had not used oral, nasal, or inhaled corticosteroids for 6 months before study. Main outcome measures were area under serum cortisol concentration curve for 22 hours (AUC(0-22h)); 24-hour urinary cortisol level; and 8 AM salivary cortisol level. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to active treatment or placebo; 125 patients completed the study and were at least 80% compliant with their regimens. Both fluticasone propionate and flunisolide caused dose-dependent suppression of HPA axis, which was statistically greater for fluticasone propionate (P = 0.0003). Dose-potency ratio showed 4.4 times more serum-cortisol suppression/microgram increase in dose with fluticasone propionate than with flunisolide. Diurnal pattern of serum cortisol suppression was persistent with fluticasone propionate and "remitting" with flunisolide. Salivary and urinary cortisol data were qualitatively similar to serum cortisol results. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone caused significantly more suppression of HPA axis than flunisolide. Flunisolide may provide a safe option for patients with asthma requiring long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.     

Changes in serum eotaxin and eosinophil cationic protein levels, and eosinophil count during treatment of childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Increased serum levels of eotaxin are related to the severity of asthma in adults. There are limited data on the effects of oral corticosteroids and inhaled corticosteroid therapy on serum levels of eotaxin and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and peripheral blood eosinophil counts (ECs) in pediatric asthma patients. We investigated prospectively the changes in eotaxin and ECP serum levels and peripheral blood ECs after administering oral corticosteroids and then inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta2 agonist treatment in pediatric patients. METHODS: Serum samples of 20 pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were collected before treatment, after 5-7 days of oral prednisolone treatment, and after 1-2 months of inhaled fluticasone plus salmeterol treatment. Peak expiratory flow was used as the outcome index. RESULTS: Serum eotaxin levels remained the same after oral prednisolone treatment, but decreased after subsequent inhalation treatment compared with the end of oral steroid treatment (64.7 +/- 22.6 vs 85.7 +/- 36.8 pg/mL, p<0.001). The EC and serum ECP levels declined soon after oral steroid treatment, rebounding to initial levels during inhalation treatment. The decrease in ECP level was positively correlated with the decrease in ECs with oral steroid treatment (r(2) = 0.28, p=0.016). There was no correlation between changes in eotaxin levels and peak expiratory flow. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the serum eotaxin level, not peripheral blood EC or serum ECP level, declines during inhaled fluticasone plus salmeterol treatment and might serve as a surrogate marker of T helper 2 residual activity in pediatric asthma.     

Methotrexate therapy of oral corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics reduces serum immunoglobulins: correlation with clinical response to therapy

BACKGROUND: Concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy of oral corticosteroid (CS)-dependent asthmatics has been shown to spare CS therapy, but the mechanism is unknown. In a previous report, we showed that MTX increases T cell inhibition by CS. In this report we focus on effects of MTX on immunoglobulin concentrations and their possible clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: To monitor changes in circulating leucocytes and Ig in a group of these patients during MTX therapy, and to relate these changes to clinical 'response' as defined by oral CS reduction. METHODS: Sixteen severe asthmatics dependent on oral prednisolone 15 (7.5-25) mg/day in addition to high dose inhaled CS were treated with MTX 15 mg intramuscularly, weekly for 28 weeks. Prednisolone dosages were maintained constant for 12 weeks then reduced systematically over the next 16 weeks provided that asthma control did not deteriorate. Patients were classified a priori as 'responders' or 'non-responders' to MTX (reduction of initial oral prednisolone requirement by >or=50% or <50%, respectively). Patients were followed-up for a further 12 weeks after MTX withdrawal. Serum Ig and differential blood leucocyte counts were measured at baseline, 12, 28 and 40 weeks. RESULTS: MTX therapy allowed significant, but individually variable, reductions in oral prednisolone dosages (P<0.00001) without alteration of lung function or symptoms. This was associated with significant reductions in mean serum concentrations of Ig of all classes, which reversed following MTX withdrawal. Reductions in IgE and IgG were significantly greater in the MTX 'responders' as compared with 'non-responders', and changes in IgE, IgG and IgM correlated with changes in prednisolone requirements. Differential blood leucocyte counts showed no significant variation. CONCLUSION: MTX therapy reduced oral CS requirements in these severe asthmatics to a degree which correlated with reduced circulating Ig but not lymphopaenia, suggesting a possible cause and effect relationship. These reductions might also contribute to the documented incidence of opportunistic infection in these circumstances.     

Hypogammaglobulinemia in asthmatic patients.

We measured quantitative immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgG subclasses) in 101 unselected asthmatic patients. We identified hypogammaglobulinemia in 12 patients primarily involving IgG (dose-related) without a strong prediction for any IgG subclass. IgA and IgM were also suppressed but to a lesser extent. This prevalence of hypogammaglobulinemia (.12 +/- standard error of .03) is significantly greater than that seen in the normal population (approximately .025 +/- .017, P = .01). Hypogammaglobulinemia was strongly associated with use of systemic corticosteroids (P = .0001). A cumulative steroid dose of greater than or equal to 5 mg/day for at least 2 years was found in 10/12 patients with hypogammaglobulinemia compared with 37/89 patients without hypogammaglobulinemia (P = .024). No significant increase in the number of infectious episodes was seen in the hypogammaglobulinemic patients. To assess the significance of hypogammaglobulinemia in asthmatics, we assessed responses to tetanus and pneumococcal vaccine in three groups of asthmatics: (1) those with total IgG less than 400 mg/dL who had been on chronic oral steroids, (2) those with total IgG between 855 and 1199 mg/dL who were currently receiving oral steroids, and (3) those with total IgG between 855 and 1199 mg/dL who were not receiving oral steroids. All patients responded normally to tetanus vaccine, but three of eight patients in the hypogammaglobulinemic group showed impaired responses to pneumococcal vaccine. Patients with impaired pneumococcal responses were not clearly distinguishable on the basis of sinus disease or pneumonia. We conclude that although many patients with severe, steroid-dependent asthma experience repeated episodes of bronchitis or exacerbations of sinusitis, these problems are rarely associated with an impairment in specific antibody production. IgG subclass deficiencies are not common in this patient population. A very small subgroup of patients manifest a more severe hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG less than 400 mg/dL) or an inordinate frequency of infectious episodes. Given that bronchitis or sinusitis can be attributed to factors other than hypogammaglobulinemia in these patients, an assessment of specific antibody production in response to pneumococcal vaccination is warranted. A small but significant percentage of such patients will demonstrate impaired responses. These patients should be considered at increased risk for bacterial infections and should, therefore, be monitored closely for infectious episodes.     

Intermittent steroid inhalation for the treatment of childhood asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids have long been considered a mainstay of therapy for asthma in children. However, concerns over long-term side effects of chronic steroid administration have led providers to turn to intermittent dosing of these medications in an attempt to treat exacerbations while limiting total corticosteroid received. The data have been somewhat mixed in this area, likely at least partially due to the difficulty providers have in classifying asthma phenotypes in young children. This review will analyze the evidence for chronic daily inhaled corticosteroid use, intermittent inhaled corticosteroid use, and dynamic dosing approaches utilizing inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist combination therapy.     

Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate the use of preventative anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and anti-inflammatory profiles of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: Twenty-one adult patients with mild asthma received 4 weeks of either once-daily inhaled hydrofluoroalkane triamcinolone acetonide (450 microg/day ex-actuator dose) or oral montelukast (10 mg/day) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study. Measurements were made before and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment. RESULTS: At the endpoint (after 4 weeks), triamcinolone and montelukast had improved the primary outcome (provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in comparison with placebo (P <.05), there being no difference between the treatments (1.09-fold; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63). Triamcinolone was better than placebo or montelukast for effects on all other surrogate inflammatory markers (P <.05), including exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein, plasma intracellular circulating adhesion molecule 1, and plasma E-selectin. Both treatments improved (P <.05) morning and evening peak flow, nighttime beta2-agonist use, and symptoms in comparison with placebo, though triamcinolone was better than montelukast (P <.05) with regard to peak flow. Triamcinolone produced suppression (P <.05) of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine and serum osteocalcin. CONCLUSION: Once-daily inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene antagonist improved the primary outcome variable of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a similar degree.     

Levels of soluble IL-2 receptor in plasma from asthmatics. Correlations with blood eosinophilia, lung function, and corticosteroid therapy.

Evidence now suggests that eosinophils and T lymphocytes infiltrating bronchial tissues may play a key role in the pathophysiology of asthma. Circulating eosinophils, lung function, and plasma soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) were measured in 42 asthmatic patients referred for symptomatic asthma. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of atopy. The group of non-atopic asthmatics was further divided according to the patients' requirement for long term oral corticosteroids. The mean sIL-2R +/- s.d. was 36.3 +/- 9.9 pM in the control group, 28.9 +/- 9.2 pM in the atopic asthmatics, 43.3 +/- 18.07 pM in the non-atopic asthmatics without oral steroid therapy, but was increased in the steroid-treated group (62.2 +/- 19.3 pM, P less than 0.01). A significant correlation was found between FEV1 and circulating eosinophils in atopic asthmatics and in non-atopic asthmatics without oral corticosteroid therapy, but not in the steroid-treated group. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between sIL-2R and FEV1, and between sIL-2R and blood eosinophils, in the group of non-atopic asthmatics not on oral steroid therapy. No such correlations were evidenced in the other groups of asthmatics. Similar results were obtained during the clinical course of three non-atopic patients followed for more than 1 year. These data suggest that T cell activation appears more prominent in non-atopic asthma than in atopic asthma. Moreover, it appears that T cell activation can occur in severe forms of asthma despite steroid treatment. Finally, the results suggest a possible link between T cell activation, eosinophils, and lung function, which may reflect a particular pathogenetic mechanism involved in non-atopic asthma.     

Step-down and step-up therapy in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: A step-down therapy may be more beneficial for the management of asthma than a step-up therapy. METHODS: Eighty-two asthmatic patients with moderate persistent asthma were enrolled in the study and randomized into three groups. One group of patients received 400 microg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) for 4 weeks and then 800 microg/day for another 4 weeks (step-up group). The other two groups of patients received 1,200 microg/day of BDP for 4 weeks with or without short-term oral steroid (prednisolone, 0.5 mg/day for 1 week) and then 800 microg/day for another 4 weeks (step-down group). Severe exacerbation of asthma, asthma symptoms, respiratory function and rescue use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists were monitored. If asthma was well controlled, the dose of BDP was decreased every 3 months and if asthma was exacerbated, the dose of BDP was increased until 8 months after the initial treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients during the run-in period, 4 patients in the step-up group, 2 patients in the step-down group treated with a high dose of BDP and no patients in the step-down group with oral steroids during first 4 weeks dropped out because of severe exacerbation of asthma. Although asthma symptoms and respiratory function significantly improved 8 weeks after the therapy in all groups, more significant and prompt improvements of these parameters were observed in patients of the step-down group than in patients of the step-up group after the first 2 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, step-down therapy with short-term oral steroid resulted in the lowest maintenance doses of BDP at 8 months of the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that step-down therapy starting with a high dose of inhaled steroid and short-term oral steroid is more effective in gaining prompt control of asthma and reducing the severe exacerbation of asthma and the maintenance dose of inhaled steroids than a step-up therapy starting with a low dose of inhaled steroids in patients with moderate persistent asthma.     

Inter-relationships between airway inflammation, reticular basement membrane thickening and bronchial hyper-reactivity to methacholine in asthma; a systematic bronchoalveolar lavage and airway biopsy analysis

Background Asthma is accepted as a disease characterized by airway inflammation, with evidence that airway structural changes, or ‘remodelling’ occurs. There are few studies relating airway physiology, inflammation and remodelling, however. We have carried out a study of inter‐relationships between airway inflammation, airway remodelling, reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickening, and bronchial hyper‐reactivity (BHR), before and after high‐dose inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 750 μg b.d.), in a group of relatively mild but symptomatic, steroid naïve asthma patients. Methods Double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in 35 asthmatics, with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway endobronchial biopsy (EBB) for inflammatory cell profiles and EBB for airway remodelling carried out at baseline, 3 and 12 months. Results At baseline RBM thickening was related to BAL mast cells and EBB eosinophil counts. In turn baseline log EBB EG2 eosinophil count, log%BAL epithelial cells and log RBM thickness explained 55% of the variability in BHR. Conclusion We provide new information that airway inflammation, remodelling, and BHR in asthma are inter‐related and improved by ICS therapy. Our data potentially support the need for early and long‐term intervention with ICS even in relatively mild asthmatics, and the need to further assess the potential merit of longitudinal BHR testing in management of some patients, as this may reflect both airway inflammation and remodelling.     

Differential effects of inhaled budesonide and oral prednisolone on serum immunoglobulin G and its subclasses in healthy adult volunteers

Background Glucocorticosteroid (GCS) treatment lowers serum IgG and IgG subclass (IgG-SC) levels, but the minimal dose and duration of administration at which this occurs is not known. Objective The aim of this study was to define the daily dose of a 2-week course of GCS at which IgG(-SC) suppression occurs. Methods The effects of three GCS treatment schemes on serum IgG(-SC) levels in healthy adults were studied in a double-blind, randomized trial. Group I (n= 10) was treated with 40mg oral prednisolone/day, group 2 (n= 10) with 10 mg oral prednisolone/day and group 3 (n= 10) with 3.2 mg inhaled budesonide/day. Blood sampling was performed at baseline and at the end of the 2-week treatment period. Results In group 1, IgGl, IgG2 and lgG3 levels were significantly decreased after treatment, while in group 2 this was only so for IgG3. In both groups, the decrease of total IgG tended towards or just reached significance. In group 3, no statistically significant changes were observed. Conclusion A course of 40mg oral prednisolone/day for 2 weeks induces significant suppression of serum IgG-SC levels; lower doses cause more subtle changes, indicating that GCS-induced IgG-SC suppression is a dose-dependent phenomenon. Short courses of very high doses of inhaled budesonide appear to be devoid of this side-effect.     

Eosinophil activation status and corticosteroid responsiveness in severe asthma

BACKGROUND: Since eosinophils are implicated in asthma pathogenesis, we investigated whether these cells were activated in severe asthma. METHODS: Twenty-six asthmatics with different clinical responses to oral corticosteroid (CS), i.e. sensitive [change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (DeltaFEV(1)) >/= 25% after oral methylprednisolone, 40 mg daily, for 14 days, n = 7], resistant (DeltaFEV(1) /= 20 mg oral prednisone daily for acceptable asthma control, n = 10), were studied. RESULTS: Calcium ionophore-induced leukotriene (LT) C(4) release of purified blood eosinophils was similar in the three groups. Cell incubation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) enhanced ionophore-induced LTC(4) release, and this effect was higher in CS-sensitive (5-fold) than in CS-resistant subjects (1.7-fold) (p = 0.02). CS treatment decreased blood eosinophil counts in these two groups of subjects (p 相似文献   

Oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of persistent and acute asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) when used to reduce daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) requirements in patients with severe persistent asthma and periodic requirements in patients with acute asthma exacerbations. DATA SOURCES: Clinical studies of the OCS-sparing effects of ICSs were located by searching MEDLINE databases from 1966 onward using the terms oral, steroid, and asthma in combination with the generic names for each marketed ICS. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on the use of ICSs to reduce OCS requirements in patients with persistent and acute asthma are included. RESULTS: Clinical study results consistently show that ICSs significantly improve asthma control and reduce OCS requirements among adults, children, and infants with persistent asthma. A dose reduction or complete discontinuation of use of OCSs is possible in most patients without loss of asthma control. ICSs also can control asthma during acute asthma exacerbations and reduce the need for short courses of OCSs. With many ICSs, the reductions in OCS use are accompanied by recovery of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, indicating that the safety of asthma therapy is improved when OCS requirements are decreased with ICSs. Of the available ICSs that may reduce OCS needs, budesonide appears to be the most intensively studied. CONCLUSIONS: ICSs can reduce OCS requirements in adults and children with persistent asthma and during acute asthma exacerbations. The reduced systemic corticosteroid activity associated with ICS treatment improves the overall safety of asthma therapy.     

Analysis of induced sputum to examine the effects of inhaled corticosteroid on airway inflammation in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of induced sputum can be performed safely in children with asthma and is useful for both cellular and biochemical markers of inflammation. Glucocorticosteroid inhalation has become the first line therapy for chronic asthma by suppressing airway inflammation, which produces the decrease of bronchial hyperreactivity and reduces the number of eosinophil in bronchial submucosa. OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of the inflammatory cells and their markers in sputum and to examine the pharmacokinetic effects of glucocorticoid within 3 hours after inhalation therapy on FEV1 and sputum inflammatory indices in children with clinically defined chronic asthma. METHODS: Thirty subjects with asthma included 14 current symptomatic asthmatics and 14 normal controls inhaled 4.5% hypertonic saline for 10 minutes by nebulizer. The expectorated sputum were collected from all asthmatics before and 3 hours after corticosteroid inhalation for children with asthma and were reduced by dithiotreitol. Total cell counts and differentials were determined. ECP was measured by CAP system. Interleukin-5, GM-CSF and albumin were measured by double sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: The mean eosinophil percentage and ECP in induced sputum of asthmatics were significantly higher than that of controls. The induced sputum samples obtained after glucocorticoid inhalation showed a significant reduction in mean eosinophil percentage, but FEV1, IL-5, GM-CSF, albumin, and ECP values were not significantly decreased. CONCLUSION: The present results in induced sputum may be interpreted to reflect direct steroid action on airways and lack of effect on bone marrow effectors at 3 hours after glucocorticoid inhalation.     

The effect of oral steroids with and without vitamin D3 on early efficacy of immunotherapy in asthmatic children

Background The possibility of additional strategies to enhance the effectiveness of specific immunotherapy (SIT) is highly attractive. Aim The aim of our study was to assess the influence of oral corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids combined with vitamin D₃ on the early clinical and immunological effects of SIT. Methods It was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial conducted in 54 asthmatic children allergic to house dust mites. Intervention was based on receiving a single dose of oral steroid, with or without vitamin D₃, or placebo only on the day of the build‐up phase of SIT. Results After 12 months of SIT, the median daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose, which controls the symptoms of asthma, was reduced by 25% in the steroid group. However, a 50% reduction of the median daily ICS dose was observed in the control group. The clinical effects of SIT were not affected in the steroid+D₃ group. Concomitantly, we found that intervention with prednisone significantly impaired the induction of T regulatory lymphocytes. Importantly, the clinical and immunological effects of SIT were not affected by intervention with steroids administered with vitamin D₃. Conclusions Our study failed to show a beneficial effect of oral corticosteroids on allergen‐specific immunotherapy. We observed that the combined administration of a corticosteroid drug and allergen extract suppressed the early clinical and immunological effects of SIT and that vitamin D₃ prevented this ‘adverse’ influence of steroids.     

A prospective study of respiratory infection in adult asthmatics and their normal spouses

A prospective study of respiratory infections was performed in nineteen married asthmatics and their normal spouses who were examined at monthly intervals during a 1-year period. The colds described were associated with nasal symptoms, sore throat and usually malaise, fever, cough and hoarseness. The asthmatics reported a larger number of these symptomatic episodes that the non-asthmatics but significantly fewer of the episodes in the asthmatics were objectively confirmed by viral isolation or rise in serum titre of viral antibody. The frequency of respiratory infections was not influenced by the long term use of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and oral corticosteroid drugs. Less than 10% of the exacerbations of asthma were associated with respiratory infection. The disability resulting from respiratory infections in the asthmatics did not significantly exceed that in the non-asthmatics.     

Improvement of asthma control with omalizumab in 2 obese pediatric asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Dosing of the anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) in the treatment of allergic asthma depends on serum IgE concentration and body weight. It is unclear whether omalizumab is therapeutically effective in obese patients with difficult-to-control asthma whose body weights fall outside dosing guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy of omalizumab in 2 obese pediatric patients with severe persistent asthma whose high body weights placed them outside current dosing guidelines. METHODS: Omalizumab was given at maximum doses to both patients. Standard asthma therapy was continued throughout the treatment period. Multiple parameters of asthma disease activity were followed at every health encounter for approximately 1 year during and before omalizumab treatment. These parameters included asthma disease severity and activity, pulmonary functions, daily inhaled corticosteroid requirements, systemic steroid rescue, and urgent care and emergency department visits and hospitalizations. RESULTS: While receiving omalizumab, both patients had improvements in asthma disease activity and reduction in systemic steroid requirements. One patient required fewer daily inhaled corticosteroids and achieved total asthma control. CONCLUSION: Patients with difficult-to-treat asthma may benefit from receiving omalizumab even if they fall outside current dosing guidelines because of high body weight.     

Effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ics) combination therapy; the addition of qvar to flutide

PURPOSE: We recently reported treatment of asthmatic patients with a combination of FP-DPI 800 microg/day and BDP-HFA 400 microg/day. This regimen induced significant improvement in subjective symptoms and pulmonary function tests. This led us to study the additive effect of BDP-HFA 400 microg/day for seven unstable severe persistent bronchial asthma patients. RESULTS: PEF improved, daily (circadian) variation was minimized and FVC and FEV1.0 testing showed slight improvement. V25/height also revealed significant improvement. The more peripheral the airways are, the greater improvement was observed. The annual emergency admission rate of 4.6 times per patient decreased to 2.1 times after the addition of BDP-HFA 400 microg/day. All the three cases dependent on oral steroid medication could be removed from the drug and 6 out of 7 cases were able to lower the dose of anti-asthmatic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) differs based on the site reached in the bronchi and depending on the inhalation devices used. Addition of a second ICS has the potential to further alleviate symptoms of unstable asthmatics on conventional therapy with ICS and other drugs.     

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

BACKGROUND: The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION: Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.     

A comparison of inhaled fluticasone and oral prednisone for children with severe acute asthma

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of children with asthma. It is uncertain how inhaled corticosteroids compare with oral corticosteroids in the management of severe acute disease. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized trial involving 100 children five years of age or older who had severe acute asthma (indicated by a forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] that was less than 60 percent of the predicted value) and in whom the results could be evaluated. All were treated with an aggressive bronchodilator regimen and received one dose of either 2 mg of inhaled fluticasone through a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer or 2 mg of oral prednisone per kilogram of body weight. They were assessed hourly for up to four hours. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) base-line FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value was 46.3+/-12.5 in the fluticasone group (51 subjects) and 43.9+/-9.9 in the prednisone group (49 subjects). The FEV1 increased by a mean of 9.4+/-12.5 percentage points in the fluticasone group and by 18.9+/-9.8 percentage points in the prednisone group four hours after therapy (P< 0.001). None of the children in the prednisone group had a reduction in FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value from base line to four hours, as compared with 25 percent of those in the fluticasone group (P<0.001). Sixteen (31 percent) of the children treated with fluticasone were hospitalized, as compared with five (10 percent) of those treated with prednisone (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe acute asthma should be treated with oral prednisone and not with inhaled fluticasone or a similar inhaled corticosteroid.