上半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕41例

目的 探讨上半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)诊断和治疗的最佳方案。方法 回顾性分析41例上半规管BPPV患者的病历资料,并对所有患者的诊断及复位进行评估分析。结果 SRM-Ⅳ模拟Dix-Hallpike试验诱发出典型垂直向下眼震28例(68.3%),其中眼震伴有向地扭转的成分19例,不伴有扭转成分9例;SRM-Ⅳ上半规管BPPV诱发试验诱发出典型垂直向下眼震35例(84.6%),其中眼震伴有向地扭转的成分30例,不伴有扭转成分5例。在所有41例患者中有38例能通过两种诱发试验对受累侧别做出判断,其中因诱发眼震伴有扭转成分而判断侧别30例,单侧诱发诱发出垂直向下眼震且不伴有扭转成分3例,双侧诱发出垂直向下眼震5例,且不伴有扭转成分,但因眩晕及眼震的强度有明显差别而判断出侧别,患者对受累侧别不能判断3例。在能判断出侧别的38例患者中有左侧上半规管受累25例,右侧上半规管受累13例。对41例采用SRM-Ⅳ上半规管BPPV复位法进行治疗,通过一次治疗痊愈28例,有效12例,无效1例。结论 上半规管BPPV 临床上被越来越重视,应用SRM-ⅣBPPV诊疗系统对上半规管BPPV进行诊治效果好,应该在临床得到推广。     

垂直悬头位试验诊断良性阵发性位置性眩晕的意义

目的探讨垂直悬头位试验对良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)诊断的意义。方法回顾性分析324例BPPV患者的临床资料,所有患者均先行Dix-Hallpike试验和滚转试验,然后行垂直悬头位试验,并研究垂直悬头位试验诱发眩晕的患者的临床特征。结果 324例BPPV患者中,经Dix-Hallpike试验和滚转试验确诊为多半规管受累的BPPV 53例(16.36%,53/324)中合并垂直悬头位试验诱发眩晕的BPPV患者27例;单半规管BPPV271例(83.64%,271/324)中,通过Dix-Hallpike试验诱发眩晕及眼震或仅诱发眩晕的患者85例(26.23%,85/324),通过滚转试验诱发眩晕及眼震或仅诱发眩晕的患者120例(37.04%,120/324),而前两项试验阴性,通过垂直悬头位试验诱发眩晕及眼震或仅诱发眩晕的患者66例(20.37%,66/324),该66例患者沿矢状位快速翻转复位后随访1周和3个月,总有效率分别为86.36%(57/66)和83.33%(55/66)。结论垂直悬头位试验使本组BPPV患者的检出率提高了20.37%(66/324),其对上半规管BPPV的诊断有一定意义;对于Dix-Hallpike和滚转试验阴性但疑为BPPV的患者,应行垂直悬头位试验。     

良性阵发性位置性眩晕的眼震图研究

目的:探讨视频眼震图(VNG)在良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)中的应用价值。方法:回顾126例BPPV患者的VNG资料,分析总结各型BPPV在Dix-Hallpike和滚转试验中VNG上的眼震特点。结果:126例BPPV患者中,后半规管BPPV(PSC-BPPV)98例(77.8%),水平半规管BPPV(HSC-BPPV)17例(13.5%),前半规管BPPV(ASC-BPPV)5例(3.9%),混合型BPPV6例(4.8%);28例PSC-BPPV记录到反转相眼震。VNG上显示PSC和ASC管石症Dix-Hallpike悬头位垂直相眼震分别向上、向下,水平相眼震均向对侧,回到坐位时眼震反向。HSC-BPPV滚转试验向两侧转头均可诱发出眼震,眼震与转头方向相同时,可判断为HSC管石症,以能够诱发较强眼震的转头侧为患侧;眼震与转头方向相反时,则为HSC嵴顶结石症,以能够诱发较弱眼震的转头侧为患侧。结论:VNG能够客观地记录BPPV患者的眼震情况,准确判断耳石所在的半规管,并且保存了眼震数据资料,可以进一步指导临床实践,值得推广。     

继发性后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊治

目的 探讨继发性良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)的诊断和治疗。方法研究继发性后半规管BPPV的内耳疾病6例病历资料,诊断依据为病史及Dix-Hallpike试验诱导出现的眼震结果。结果 6例内耳疾病(分别为突发性聋3例, 梅尼埃病2例, 前庭神经元炎1例)伴有后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕被确诊,通过Dix-Hallpike试验诱发出垂直扭转型眼震。结论 继发性BPPV临床较少见,常为后半规管受累,通过Dix-Hallpike试验和Epley手法复位可以确诊和治愈。     

上半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断及治疗

目的探讨上半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕（benign paroxysmal positional vertigo，BPPV）的诊断和治疗。方法回顾性分析了上半规管BPPV患者31例，并对所有患者采用管石复位法治疗后的效果进行评估。结果在Dix-Hallpike检查中，所有患者均诱发出垂直向下的眼震。22例（70．97％）患者一侧诱发出眼震，其中17例眼震伴有扭转成分，5例眼震不伴扭转成分。其余9例（29．03％）患者双侧诱发出现眼震，眼震伴有扭转成分的7例，其中2例眼震扭转方向指向同一侧，4例眼震的扭转方向不固定，1例患者仅一侧出现扭转成分。另外2例患者眼震不伴扭转成分。受累侧别明确诊断的19例（61．29％），其中11例为左侧上半规管受累，8例为右侧上半规管受累。受累侧别未明确诊断的12例（38．71％）。所有患者中，11例（35．48％）患者同时合并后半规管受累。对所有患者采取管石复位法治疗，21例（67．74％）痊愈，29例（93．55％）有效、2例（6．45％）无效。其中首次治愈14例（45．16％），平均治愈次数为1．71次。随访期间5例复发。结论上半规管BPPV临床中少见。在变位检查中，眼震的扭转成分较弱，临床中不易观察。在部分单侧上半规管BPPV患者中，双侧检查均能诱发眼震。管石复位法是治疗上半规管BPPV简单有效的手段。     

水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断

目的探讨水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕（BPPV）的诊断。方法自2003年1月至2006年9月，本眩晕中心共确诊为水平半规管BPPV（HSC BPPV）患者46例。诊断依据为典型的病史及用红外视频眼震电图仪记录患者在Dix—Hallpike试验和滚转试验中的眼震结果，并排除其他疾病。研究HSC BPPV的眼震特点。结果441例诊断为BPPV患者中，46例（10．43％）为水平半规管BPPV。其中38例（82．61％）为单侧病变，5例（10．87％）患者合并同侧后半规管病变，3例（6．52％）为双侧病变。35例患者通过两种试验诱发出水平眼震，11例患者仅通过滚转试验诱发出水平眼震。25例患者眼震方向向地，13例患者眼震方向背地，3例患者眼震方向不固定，5例患者各种手法诱发出同一方向的眼震。29例患者在双侧手法中出现眼震，17例患者在一侧手法中出现眼震。结论HSC BPPV眼震为完全水平性且多为快相向地。通常受累耳在双侧手法中均可出现眼震，以向患侧为重。一侧水平半规管和后半规管可同时受累。滚转试验在HSC BPPV检查中比Dix—Hallpike试验更加敏感。Dix—Hallpike试验结合滚转试验可使更多的HSCBPPV患者得到确诊．     

Dix-Hallpike诱发试验双侧阳性的良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床分析

目的探讨良性阵发性位置性眩晕(Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo,BPPV)患者Dix-Hallpike诱发试验双侧阳性的眼震特点和诊治策略。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月就诊于安徽医科大学第二附属医院耳鼻喉科的BPPV患者的诊治过程。结果 Dix-Hallpike诱发试验,阳性患者150例,其中双侧阳性患者14例,2例双侧可见扭转、向上、向地性眼震,进一步行平躺试验为垂直向上性眼震,分次给予双侧改良Epley法复位后双侧眼震均消失;12例患侧为扭转、向上、向地性眼震,健侧为扭转、向上、离地性眼震者,给予患侧改良Epley法复位后双侧眼震均消失。结论除了双侧后半规管BPPV,部分单侧后半规管BPPV患者行Dix-Hallpike诱发试验也可表现为双侧阳性结果,临床诊治应注意眼震方向形式的差别。     

正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike法诊断良性阵发性位置性眩晕

目的评价正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike诱发检查法在诊断后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(benign paroxysmal positional vertigo,BPPV)中的意义。方法回顾性总结广东省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科眩晕门诊2008年4月1日到5月29日根据经典或者正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike法诊断为后半规管BPPV患者28例的临床资料,均首先进行正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike诱发试验,如结果为阴性后继续行经典Dix-Hallpike检测证实为后半规管性BPPV。比较正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike相对于经典Dix-Hallpike的阳性率。结果28例后半规管BPPV患者中,正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike诱发试验相对于经典Dix-Hallpike诱发实验的阳性率为78.57%(22/28)。结论正中悬头位Dix-Hallpike法诊断BPPV可以有效地简化诊治程序,并减轻部分患者诱发的眩晕及眼震强度,具有一定的临床意义。但由于其阳性率低于经典方法,故在临床上不能完全代替经典方法。     

红外视频采集仪记录BPPV患者眼震的结果分析

目的探讨用红外视频眼动采集仪(CHARTR VNG)观察记录良性阵发性位置性眩晕(benign paroxys-mal positional vertigo,BPPV)患者的眼震特点。方法用红外视频采集仪详细记录78例BPPV患者在Dix-Hallpike试验及滚转试验中的眼震变化。结果40例(51.28%)为一侧后半规管病变;13例(16.67%)为一侧水平半规管病变;6例(7.7%)为一侧上半规管病变;19例(24.36%)出现多发位置性眼震,其中6例为双侧后半规管病变,2例双侧上半规管病变,3例为双侧水平半规管病变,8例患者在不同头位下出现眼震,提示混合半规管病变。结论红外视频眼动采集仪可以更直观地观察眼动变化,对诊断BPPV受累半规管提供可靠依据,特别是对非典型位置性的眼震,能更好的提示良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者非典型位置性的眼震发生率,包括水平半规管、上半规管病变和多个半规管联合病变。患者的治疗可以根据不同的受累半规管采取不同方法。     

良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者裸眼及视频眼震图下眼震特征及定位诊断分析

目的探讨裸眼及视频眼震图(videonystagmograph,VNG)下观察良性阵发性位置性眩晕(benign positional paroxysmal vertigo,BPPV)患者眼震及诊断结果的差异。方法108例BPPV患者分别进行Dix-Hallpike和滚转试验(Roll),应用红外视频眼震电图仪观察眼震特点,进行定位诊断,并与裸眼下观察其眼震特征及诊断结果进行比较。结果 108例患者中共诊断后半规管BPPV(PSC-BPPV)75例(69.44%,75/108),裸眼及VNG辅助下典型眼震检出率分别为66.67%(50/75)和93.33%(70/75);前半规管BPPV(ASC-BPPV)18例(16.67%,18/108),裸眼及VNG下典型眼震检出率分别为72.22%(13/18)和100%(18/18),两者差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);水平半规管BPPV(HSC-BPPV)9例(8.33%),裸眼及VNG辅助下分别正确诊断7例和9例;混合型BPPV6例(5.56%),裸眼及VNG辅助下分别正确诊断3例和6例。结论 VNG能够客观地记录BPPV患者的眼震情况,有助于提高眼震的检出率及诊断的准确性。     

Posterior semicircular canal type benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo with ageotropic paroxysmal positioning nystagmus

We report on 3 patients with typical benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo (BPPV) and atypical, paroxysmal positioning nystagmus. When the Dix-Hallpike test was performed, the patients exhibited an ageotropic nystagmus, different from that classically described in posterior semicircular canal BPPV. It was torsional-vertical with the vertical component beating downwards, and the torsional component was beating away from the lowermost ear. In both left and right Dix-Hallpike positions, the upper poles of the eyes were turning away from the lowermost ear. The atypical ageotropic paroxysmal positional nystagmus of the posterior semicircular canal was observed in the evolution of the BPPV in 2 patients and on the first examination in the third. Two patients had changing patterns of paroxysmal positioning nystagmus.     

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is characterized by positional vertigo (brief attacks of rotatory vertigo triggered by head position changes in the direction of gravity) and is the most common peripheral cause of vertigo. There are two types of BPPV pathophysiology: canalolithiasis and cupulolithiasis. In canalolithiasis, otoconial debris is detached from the otolithic membrane and floats freely within the endolymph of the canal. In cupulolithiasis, the otoconial debris released from the otolithic membrane settles on the cupula of the semicircular canal and the specific gravity of the cupula is increased. Consensus has been reached regarding three subtypes of BPPV: posterior-canal-type BPPV (canalolithiasis), lateral-canal-type BPPV (canalolithiasis) and lateral-canal-type BPPV (cupulolithiasis). In the interview-based medical examination of BPPV, questions regarding the characteristics of vertigo, triggered movement of vertigo, duration of vertigo and cochlear symptoms during vertigo attacks are important for the diagnosis of BPPV. The Dix–Hallpike test is a positioning nystagmus test used for diagnosis of posterior-canal-type BPPV. The head roll test is a positional nystagmus test used for diagnosis of lateral-canal-type BPPV. When the Dix–Hallpike test is repeated, positional nystagmus and the feeling of vertigo typically become weaker. This phenomenon is called BPPV fatigue. The effect of BPPV fatigue typically disappears within 30 min, at which point the Dix–Hallpike test again induces clear positional nystagmus even though BPPV fatigue had previously caused the positional nystagmus to disappear. For the treatment of BPPV, sequential head movements of patients can cause the otoconial debris in the semicircular canal to move to the utricle. This series of head movements is called the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP). The appropriate type of CRP depends on the semicircular canal in which the otoconial debris is located. The CRP for posterior-canal-type BPPV is called the Epley maneuver, and the CRP for lateral-canal-type BPPV is called the Gufoni maneuver. Including a time interval between each head position in the Epley maneuver reduces the immediate effect of the maneuver. This finding can inform the development of methods for reducing the effort exerted by doctors and the discomfort experienced by patients with posterior-canal-type BPPV during the Epley maneuver.     

Positional and positioning down-beating nystagmus without central nervous system findings

We report the clinical features of 4 cases with positional or positioning down-beating nystagmus in a head-hanging or supine position without any obvious central nervous system disorder. The 4 cases had some findings in common. There were no abnormal findings on neurological tests or brain MRI. They did not have gaze nystagmus. Their nystagmus was observed only in a supine or head-hanging position and it was never observed upon returning to a sitting position and never reversed. The nystagmus had no or little torsional component, had latency and tended to decrease with time. The positional DBN (p-DBN) is known to be indicative of a central nervous system disorder. Recently there were some reports that canalithiasis of the anterior semicircular canal (ASC) causes p-DBN and that patients who have p-DBN without obvious CNS dysfunction are dealt with anterior semicircular canal (ASC) benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). There are some doubts as to the validity of making a diagnosis of ASC-BPPV in a case of p-DBN without CNS findings. It is hard to determine the cause of p-DBN in these cases.     

不同变位试验在良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断价值

目的：探讨不同变位试验在诊断良性阵发性位置性眩晕（BPPV）中的价值。方法：对我科2000年2月～2004年4月诊断的后半规管（PC）源性良性眩晕72例,采用交叉设计,随机将其中36例先行Dix-Hallpike试验,再行侧卧试验;男36例试验排序与其相反。此后再行仰卧侧头位试验。结果：Dix-Hallpike试验和侧卧试验在诊断PC—BPPV中所得结果具有关联性（P〈0．01）,诊断阳性率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;两者裸眼观察到眼震的典型阳性反应分别为77．9％及77．1％,差异亦无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。2种试验诱发眩晕和（或）眼震具有的潜伏期、持续期及性质、方向等特征无差异。1例患者同时仰卧侧头位试验阳性,诊断同时存在PC—BPPV。结论：在诊断PC—BPPV中,侧卧试验与Dix-Hallpike具有相同的客观诊断价值。在活动受限的情形下,侧卧试验更易于操作及更具安全性,可完全取代Dix-Hallpike试验。在前2种试验出现水平眼震时应同时行仰卧头位试验,以确定是否同时伴有或为水平半规管源性病变。     

Multiple positional nystagmus suggests multiple canal involvement in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Conclusion. Video-oculography demonstrates a higher occurrence of atypical positional nystagmus in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). This includes anterior and horizontal canal variants and multiple positional nystagmus, suggesting combined lesions affecting several canals. Objective. To analyse the video-oculographic findings of positional tests in patients with BPPV. Material and methods. Seventy individuals with symptoms of BPPV and positional nystagmus were included in this study. The diagnosis was based on a history of brief episodes of vertigo and the presence of positional nystagmus as confirmed by video-oculographic examination during the Dix–Hallpike test, the McClure test or the head-hanging manoeuvre. Patients were treated by means of different particle repositioning manoeuvres according to the affected canal (Epley's manoeuvre for the posterior or anterior canals and Lempert's manoeuvre for the lateral canal) and the effectiveness was evaluated at 7 and 30 days. Results. Twenty-nine individuals (41.43%) presented an affected unilateral posterior canal. Fifteen patients (21.43%) presented a pure horizontal direction-changing positional nystagmus consistent with a diagnosis of horizontal canal BPPV. Twelve individuals (17.14%) presented a unilateral down-beating nystagmus, suggesting possible anterior canal BPPV. In addition, 14 patients (20%) showed multiple positional nystagmus during the examination corresponding to simultaneous multi-canal BPPV, 5 had bilateral posterior canal BPPV and 2 presented a positional down-beating nystagmus in both left and right Dix–Hallpike manoeuvres and the head-hanging manoeuvre, which is highly suggestive of anterior canal BPPV. However, seven individuals showed positional horizontal and vertical side-changing nystagmus that could not be explained by single-canal BPPV. These patients with multiple positional nystagmus showed changing patterns of positional nystagmus at follow-up.     

Clinical features of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Our understanding of the pathomechanism of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) has improved dramatically. A type of BPPV featuring mixed torsional and vertical nystagmus induced by the Dix-Hallpike maneuver involves the posterior semicircular canal (P-BPPV). The other type of BPPV featuring horizontal nystagmus induced by spine-to-lateral head positioning involves the horizontal canal BPPV (H-BPPV). In complaints of vertigo or dizziness, 619 patients visited our department last year. Of these, 142 (23%) was had positional nystagmus consistent with a diagnosis of BPPV, 118 (19%) had no nystagmus but were suspected of BPPV due to vertigo episodes. BPPV was the most frequent diagnosis. H-BPPV was not rare, but accounted for 30% of BPPV. Of H-BPPV, 73% featured direction changing geotropic nystagmus, and 27% direction changing apogeotropic nystagmus. H-BPPV resolved faster than P-BPPV. Most cases caused by head trauma were P-BPPV. Transition between P- and H-BPPV was found in 6 cases. Women outnumbered men by about 3 to 2 in both P- and H-BPPV. Peak incidence was found in the those in their 60s and 70s, suggesting that the etiologies of both types of BPPV are essentially the same.