心理干预对面部化学剥脱术患者焦虑和疼痛的影响

目的 探讨评价心理干预对面部化学剥脱术患者焦虑和疼痛的影响。方法 选取2021年 7月-2022年12月咸阳市中心医院门诊收治的62例面部化学剥脱术患者为研究对象，按照随机数字表法 分为对照组与观察组，每组31例。对照组予以常规护理，观察组在对照组基础上加用心理干预，比较 两组疼痛发生情况、心境状态及满意度。结果 观察组疼痛总发生率为9.68%，低于对照组的48.39%， 差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组焦虑、慌乱、紧张、抑郁及自尊感评分优于对照组，差异有统计 学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组满意度为96.77%，高于对照组的80.65%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 对面部化学剥脱术患者实施心理干预能减轻其疼痛，改善不良心态，提高满意度。     

心理干预对隆乳术患者焦虑及疼痛的影响

隆乳术是一种有创手术,患者对手术效果期望值很高,同时又有焦虑、紧张等心理问题[1].笔者对50例隆乳术患者进行有效的心理干预,取得了良好效果.报道如下.     

心理干预对安装心脏起搏器患者焦虑及疼痛的影响

对60例采用Ikcda钉合法治疗先天性巨结肠症的患者进行科学的手术护理配合。结果60例患儿未发生围术期死亡,术后无1例感染,恢复快。提示充分做好术前准备,熟悉该手术的特点,敏捷、熟练的术中配合,严格执行无菌操作规程是手术成功的重要环节。     

化学剥脱术的面部美容治疗45例

用化学剥脱剂对部分面部色素性皮肤病，角化性皮肤病进行美容治疗，自配３３％三氟醋酸溶液，无痛酚溶液点涂或片状涂布地面部皮肤损区域，使皮损自行结痂脱落。共治疗４５天病人，其中面部黑子１８例，面部先天性色痣１０例，面部咖啡斑６例，Ｂｅｃｋｅｒ‘ｓ痣４例，面部老年斑４例，疣状痣２例，汗孔角化症１例，除１例汗孔角化症治疗效果不满意外，其余４４例病人经１～３次剥脱治疗后皮肤消失，获满意的美容治疗效果。化学剥脱     

心理干预对痔患者术后疼痛和尿潴留的影响

疼痛和尿潴留是痔手术后最常见的并发症，2006-2007年，笔者对痔术后患者给予心理行为干预，效果显著，现报告如下。     

心理干预对围术期患者的影响

目的 研究心理干预在缓解围术期焦虑方面的作用。方法 选取ASAⅠ～Ⅲ级的外科住院患者120例。排除精神疾病及昏迷患者，不限手术种类。随机分为干预组（A组）、对照组（B组）。两组患者于术前一天均由麻醉科医师访视，并以SAS焦虑量表进行心理评分，记录血压、脉搏、心率（基础）及学历。A组患者除常规身体准备外，还由麻醉医师向其介绍麻醉和手术方面的详细信息，解答患者提出的疑问。人手术室两组患者以SAS焦虑量表进行心理评分。记录血压、脉搏、心率。术后第一天随访，同时以SAS焦虑量表进行心理评分。记录血压、脉搏、心率变化。结果 A组干预前后焦虑评分比较；A组术后焦虑评分与术前比；干预后A、B两组比较；术后A、B两组比较，差异均有显著性。结论 通过麻醉医师术前心理干预可以降低外科围术期患者焦虑程度，同时表现在血压、心率更趋正常。40—60岁年龄段焦虑评分高于20—40岁年龄段与〉60岁年龄段。但患者血压、心率与同年龄段的焦虑程度无关。     

隆乳术患者心理干预的应用研究

目的：探讨隆乳患者心理干预措施,评估心理干预效果。方法：将44例隆乳患者随机分为观察组和对照组各22例。对照组常规护理,观察组在此基础上给予心理干预。分别于入院时和术后两周用症状自评量表（SCL-90）进行评分,术后观察记录疼痛情况。结果：观察组的焦虑和疼痛程度明显低于对照组（P〈0．01）。结论：实施心理行为干预可降低患者的焦虑和疼痛程度。     

心理干预对下颌角改型患者疼痛和焦虑的影响

随着面部改型手术技术的不断发展和完善,越来越多的求美者希望通过手术来改变自己的面貌。面部改型术后面部改变较大,且局部疼痛不适,肿胀明显,恢复时间也较慢,受术者往往存在不同程度的心理障碍,因此对受术者进行有效的心理干预,降低患者焦虑、抑郁程度,使患者以积极的心理状态面对手术已是不容忽视的问题,我院从2007年1月以来对部分面部改型受术者实行重点心理干预,效果满意,现报道如下。     

心理干预对整形美容外科手术患者紧张焦虑心理的影响

目的:探讨心理干预对整形美容外科手术患者产生紧张焦虑心理的影响。方法:将413例手术患者随机分为观察组(208例)和对照组(205例)。对照组接受一般心理护理,观察组接受依据准确期待而制定的干预措施,测定并比较两组患者紧张、焦虑程度,手术前中后的血压、心率波动情况,以及紧张、焦虑程度对手术时间的影响。结果:心理干预后观察组的血压、心率、紧张焦虑程度及手术时间显著低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论:心理干预可以缓解整形美容外科手术患者紧张、焦虑心理,降低血压波动范围及缩短手术时间。     

综合心理干预在颜面部烧伤患者治疗中的应用

目的:通过对颜面部烧伤患者的综合心理干预,探讨颜面部烧伤患者心理健康状况及对生活能力的影响,评估综合心理干预在颜面部烧伤患者临床疗效中的重要作用。方法:将95例患者随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组在实施常规医学护理的同时给予各类综合心理干预措施。干预前后均采用抑郁自评量表、焦虑自评量表、症状自评量表和Bart hel指数记分法对患者心理状况及生活能力进行评定。结果:综合心理干预后,实验组SDS评分、SAS评分均明显低于对照组,实验组抑郁、焦虑、恐怖、精神病性因子评分等也明显低于对照组。结论:在颜面部烧伤患者的临床治疗中,综合心理干预能够更好的改善患者的焦虑、抑郁、心理健康状况、生活自理能力。对颜面烧伤患者实施综合心理干预,在其整个治疗中非常必要且具有重要意义。     

对面部烧伤整形患者伴有情绪障碍人本主义心理干预的疗效评估

目的：探讨应用人本主义疗法对伴有情绪障碍的面部烧伤整形患者实施心理干预的效果。方法：将63例伴有情绪障碍的面部烧伤整形住院患者随机分为干预组31例,对照组32例。对照组给予常规心理护理,干预组在常规心理护理的基础上,给予人本主义疗法。两组患者在干预前后的心理状况分别用焦虑自评量表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）和症状自评量表（SCL-90）进行评价。结果：干预组在干预后焦虑和抑郁情绪、思维、情感、行为、人际关系等方面较对照组有统计学意义,P〈0.01。结论：应用人本主义疗法对伴有情绪障碍的面部烧伤整形患者实施心理干预能显著地降低焦虑和抑郁情绪,改善患者的症状,在临床烧伤整形患者心理护理中效果明显,措施可行。     

以“心理护理实践指南”为指导对肿瘤患者实施心理干预

目的探讨以"心理护理实践指南"为指导对肿瘤患者实施心理干预的效果。方法将213例肿瘤化疗患者按随机数字表分为观察组(102例)和对照组(111例)。对照组按常规进行治疗及护理,护理措施包括入院介绍、饮食护理、健康教育等;观察组在常规治疗及护理基础上,以"心理护理实践指南"为指导对肿瘤患者实施心理干预,即与患者建立良好的护患关系,为患者提供相关资讯信息,重视患者的情感和社会支持,积极、合理地处理患者的强烈负性情绪。分别于入院当天及干预后第21天采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)进行焦虑、抑郁评分。结果干预后观察组SAS、SDS评分显著低于对照组(均P<0.01)。结论以"心理护理实践指南"为指导对肿瘤患者实施心理干预,让患者得到合适的、规范化的心理护理干预,有助于减轻肿瘤患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪。     

心理干预对聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶取出术预后效果的影响

目的:探讨心理干预在聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(polyacrylamide hydrogel,PAHG)取出术患者心理恢复中的作用。方法:通过对94例PAHG取出术患者进行心理干预研究,初步了解PAHG取出术患者心理障碍的状态,并检验心理干预对PAHG患者心理障碍有无效果。结果:PAHG患者存在不同程度的抑郁和焦虑,进行心理干预的实验组患者可以在术后1天即有抑郁和焦虑的状态减轻,并且随心理干预的进行,术后1周可以达到进一步减轻。结论:心理干预可以有效减轻PAHG取出术患者的抑郁和焦虑状态。     

Effects of aromatherapy with Rosa damascene and lavender on pain and anxiety of burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain and anxiety were considered the most common complications of treatment procedures in burn patients. Non-pharmacological drugs, including aromatherapy, can decrease these issues. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarise the effects of aromatherapy with Rosa damascene (RD) and lavender on the pain and anxiety of burn patients. A systematic search was performed on international electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, as well as on Iranian electronic databases such as Iranmedex and Scientific Information Database (SID) with keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as “Burns”, “Pain”, “Pain management”, “Anxiety”, and “Aromatherapy” were performed from the earliest to November 1, 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist assessed the quality of randomised control trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. STATA v.14 software was used to estimate pooled effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² value. Random effect model and inverse-variance method using sample size, mean, and standard deviation changes were applied to determine standard mean differences (SMD). The confidence interval of 95% was considered to determine the confidence level. A total of 586 burn patients participated in six studies, including three RCT studies and three quasi-experimental studies. The results based on RCT studies showed RD significantly decreased the dressing pain average when compared to the control group (SMD: −1.61, 95%CI: −2.32 to −0.99, Z = 5.09, I²: 66.2%, P < 0.001). Aromatherapy with lavender decreased the average pain in the interventional group more than in the control group (SMD: −1.78, 95%CI: −3.62 to 0.07, Z = 1.89, I²: 97.2%, P = 0.06). Using aromatherapy with RD and lavender significantly decreased pain average in the interventional group than the control group (SMD: −1.68, 95%CI: −2.64 to −0.72, Z = 3.42, I²: 94.2%, P = 0.001). The results showed RD significantly decreased the anxiety average in the interventional group than the control group (SMD: −2.49, 95%CI: −2.98 to −2.0, Z = 9.94, I²: 51.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, this study showed that aromatherapy with RD decreased pain and anxiety of dressing procedures in burn patients. Although aromatherapy with lavender decreased pain in the patients, it was not statistically significant. More RCTs studies are required to be able to better judge the effects of aromatherapy with RD and lavender on the pain and anxiety of burn patients.     

Effects of breathing exercise techniques on the pain and anxiety of burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarise the effect of breathing exercise techniques (BET) on the pain and anxiety of burn patients during burn care. A systematic search was performed on international electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, as well as on Iranian electronic databases such as Iranmedex and Scientific Information Database (SID) with keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as ‘Burns’, ‘Bandages’, ‘Pain’, ‘Pain management’, ‘Anxiety’, ‘Breathing’, and ‘Breathing exercise’, which were performed from the earliest to 4 April 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist assessed the quality of randomised control trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. The current meta-analysis was performed using STATA V.14.0 software. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance levels. Random effect model was used to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD). A total of 469 burn patients participated in 10 studies. Exactly 58.60% of burn patients were male, and the number of people in the intervention and control groups was equal. The mean age of burn patients was 32.84 (SD = 10.39). Exactly 78.05% of patients had second-degree burns. The mean study duration was 19 weeks. Results of analysis of RCT studies showed BET decreased insignificantly pain severity (WMD: −1.17, 95%CI: −2.54 to 0.21, Z = 1.66, P = .096, I²:97.1%) in the intervention group than control group. However, the results of non-RCTs studies indicated BET significantly decreased pain (WMD: −1.38, 95%CI: −2.16 to −0.61, Z = 3.49, P < .001, I²:88.4%) and anxiety (WMD: −4.91, 95%CI: −9.35 to −0.47, Z = 2.71, P = .03 0.001, I²:88.4%) in the intervention group than control group. Overall, the results of RCTs found BET intervention decreased pain in the intervention group when compared with the control group; however, it was statistically insignificant. Also, results of non-RCT studies showed intervention of BET significantly decreased pain and anxiety in burns patients. More RCTs studies are required for better judgement of the effectiveness of BET intervention in clinical settings.     

虚拟现实技术对结肠镜检查患者疼痛和焦虑的影响

目的 探讨减轻结肠镜检查患者疼痛和焦虑的有效方法。 方法 将接受结肠镜检查的60例患者随机分为对照组、虚拟现实组和清醒镇静组各20例。对照组接受常规结肠镜检查；虚拟现实组患者在检查过程中佩戴虚拟现实一体机无线头盔眼镜，视听自选视频；清醒镇静组在检查时接受镇静药物处理。评价患者检查各阶段生命体征，疼痛及焦虑评分。 结果 检查中清醒镇静组、虚拟现实组疼痛评分显著低于对照组，检查后患者焦虑评分显著低于对照组（均P＜0.05）。 结论 虚拟现实技术可减轻患者结肠镜检查过程中的疼痛，并改善患者的焦虑状态。     

The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We prospectively studied the impact of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy on patient well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 211 consecutive men who underwent a total of 218 biopsy events in a questionnaire based survey focusing on pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction risk factors. Surveys were administered before, and immediately, 1 week and 1 month after biopsy. Quantitative information on the intensity of symptoms and signs was obtained using a uniform grading system. RESULTS: Intraoperative pain considered severe in 20% of the biopsy events was associated with pain in the first 24 hours postoperatively, leading to analgesic use in 10%. Inflammatory infiltrate in the biopsy core and younger patient age correlated with persistent pain on days 2 and 7 after biopsy, respectively. Preoperative anxiety was reported in 64% of biopsy events and predictive of intraoperative pain. Anxiety peaked before result disclosure. Erectile dysfunction attributed to anxiety in anticipation of biopsy was reported in 7% of cases. At days 7 and 30, 15% of previously potent patients reported erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being begins while waiting for the scheduled procedure. Shortening the anticipation period before results are disclosed and administering pre-biopsy anxiety decreasing measures may benefit patients. Analgesic therapy is recommended in younger patients, those reporting moderate to severe intraoperative pain and those with known prostatic inflammatory infiltrate. The risk of acute erectile dysfunction should be discussed cautiously with patients who are potent before biopsy.