A case of latex allergy caused by hypersensitivity to the latex-containing facemask

We experienced anesthetic management of a 2 year-old girl with Pierre-Robin syndrome. She had received respiratory support for 6 months from the birth. As soon as we induced general anesthesia, she had a skin rash. We suspected that this rash was caused by hypersensitivity to the latex-containing facemask. We stopped anesthesia and postponed operation. After a month, operation was performed under general anesthesia using latex-free anesthetic circuit and equipments. Perioperative course was uneventful. Since the first report in 1979, the number of patients with latex allergy has progressively been increasing. It has been reported that latex allergy occurs in persons considered at high risk for latex allergy including patients with spina bifida, urogenital abnormalities and atopic dermatitis, and in health care workers and rubber industry workers. If patients suspected of having latex allergy undergo surgical procedures, anesthesiologists must check patients' past history and possibility of chronic exposure to latex products. In these cases, preoperative preparation is essential and thorough precaution should also be taken to avoid life-threatening allergic reaction.     

Anaphylactic reaction to latex during spinal anesthesia: a case report

A 46-year-old man, with a history of atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma, underwent surgery for an inguinal hernia. Forty-three minutes subsequent to spinal anesthesia, the patient complained suddenly of dyspnea with wheezing. Blood pressure decreased and skin eruption was observed on his chest. Postoperative laboratory tests revealed high IgE concentration, and a skin test confirmed an allergy to latex. The patient's allergic reaction was easily overlooked because of his history of bronchial asthma and the possibility that the hypotension was caused by the high spinal anesthesia. Latex allergy should be considered in any suspicious case presenting with these symptoms during surgery. After recovery, a skin test should be used to confirm the allergy to avoid repeated allergic episodes.     

Hetastarch allergy and positive latex radioallergosorbent test in a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during multiple perioperative periods

The cause of sudden cardiovascular collapse in the perioperative period can be elusive. Allergy may be overlooked as a cause. When allergy is considered, latex is often suspected. Because hetastarch is frequently used in situations involving hypovolemia and hypotension, and because allergic reactions to it are rare, it may be overlooked as a possible allergen. We report a case of a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during four nonconsecutive perioperative periods before it was determined that she was allergic to hetastarch. She also had a very highly positive latex radioallergosorbent test, suggesting a latex allergy.     

Intraoperative anaphylaxis to latex

This case report describes intraoperative anaphylaxis occurring in a fourteen-year-old female with spina bifida in which latex surgical gloves were incriminated as the aetiologic agent. The patient was non-atopic but since eight years of age she had developed localized angioedema and urticarial skin reactions on exposure to rubber. She had previously undergone several uneventful surgical procedures. Forty-five minutes following induction of anaesthesia and during laparotomy for elective cholecystectomy she experienced sudden onset of increased airway pressure, oxygen desaturation, tachycardia, profound hypotension and erythema consistent with an anaphylactic reaction. Resuscitation with manual ventilation and oxygen, intravenous fluids and an epinephrine infusion was successful. Subsequent investigations for allergies demonstrated a strongly positive skin prick test and RAST to latex antigen, with negative results to anaesthetic agents, antibiotics and inhalant allergens. During two later operations prophylaxis consisting of diphenhydramine, ranitidine and hydrocortisone appeared to prevent further reactions. Latex should be considered as a cause of life-threatening intraoperative allergic reactions in patients with a history of rubber allergy or frequent exposure to latex products.     

Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings

Compression stockings are used for patients under general anesthesia to prevent occurrence of deep venous thrombosis. We report a case of allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings. A 53-year-old house wife had a history of sensitivity like skin eruption and disstasis to rubber products such as rubber band. Left nephrectomy for rupture of renal angiomyolipoma was scheduled under general and epidural anesthesia. Further examination for gum allergy was not performed before the operation, although latex allergy was suspected. The operation was performed uneventfully under latex-safe environment in the operating room under guideline for latex allergy. Postoperatively, ringed edematous erythema and wheal occurred in her bilateral thighs compressed with the upper part of compression stockings. The skin symptoms continued for more than four days. After disappearance of the skin symptoms, she was discharged from the hospital on the ninth day after the operation. Synthetic rubber, neoprene, in the upper part of compression stockings to prevent slipping down might cause allergic contact dermatitis. We should take care of occurrence of allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings in patients with rubber allergy.     

Powder-induced anaphylactic shock following use of powdered latex gloves during gynecological open laparotomy

A 42-year-old woman with hysteromyoma underwent total abdominal hysterectomy under general and epidural anesthesia. Three years before, she had undergone resection of lipoma on her left shoulder under local anesthesia uneventfully. She had no previous history of hypersensitivity. General anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of fentanyl, propofol, and vecuronium followed by inhalation of nitrous oxide, oxygen, and sevoflurane. Lidocaine and fentanyl were injected through a lumbar epidural catheter. After the start of open laparotomy, there was a sudden onset of hypotension. Administrations of ephedrine and phenylephrine, and volume loading were ineffective. Moreover, she showed profound hypotension, tachycardia, oxygen desaturation, decreased endtidal carbon dioxide and increased airway pressure. She broke out in a sweat with flushing on her chest and upper extremities. Therefore, we interrupted the surgery, checked her arterial blood gas analysis, performed echocardiography, and inserted a pulmonary artery catheter. We made a diagnosis of anaphylactic shock and administered methylprednisolone, albumin, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine to treat the circulatory collapse. The gynecologists changed their surgical gloves from a powdered-latex type to a powder-free latex type, and the surgery was resumed. She responded well to appropriate emergent therapy and all vasopressor drugs were gradually decreased and eventually stopped. After the end of the surgery, she recovered completely from the signs and symptoms of shock. Later, we found a high level of plasma latex protein-specific IgE antibody and confirmed the events as anaphylactic shock due to latex. We assumed that the anaphylactic shock was powder-induced latex allergy following use of powdered latex gloves in this case. Latex allergy should be suspected if an anaphylactic reaction or shock accompanied by circulatory collapse, respiratory failure, and skin symptoms of unknown origin occurs during surgery. As women more often come into contact with household articles containing latex, we suspect that women are prone to developing sensitivity towards latex. We recommend that powder-free or latex-free surgical gloves should be available not only for patients with a high risk of developing latex allergy, but also for patients indicated for gynecological open laparotomy.     

Transfer of peanut allergy following lung transplantation: a case report

This case study describes a patient who developed peanut allergy following lung transplantation. A 54-year-old woman underwent bilateral lung transplantation on June 2009 owing to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She had no history of food allergy before transplantation. The donor, however, was a 20-year-old man who was fatally injured during an automobile accident; he was allergic to peanuts. At 3 months after transplantation, the lung recipient presented with acute dyspnea and urticaria 15 minutes after consuming food containing peanut derivatives. Pre- and posttransplantation recipient blood samples analyzed for the presence of IgE antibodies specific for peanut allergens confirmed that the allergy had been passively transfered as a consequence of transplantation. Food allergy following solid organ transplantation is thought to be rare, mostly occurring in children. Two mechanisms may explain the observations described for the patient reported in this study: de novo development of peanut allergies after transplantation, or passive transfer of peanut allergies from a peanut-sensitized organ donor. This case report documenting pre- and posttransplantation IgE status in a lung transplantation case suggested that the allergic status of organ donors should be thoroughly assessed before transplantation, and potential allergy transfer risks must be discussed with the transplant team and the patient.     

Latex allergy: diagnostic pitfalls

A 44-year-old woman, native of Martinique, with a history of multiple allergies and severe asthma, sustained an unexplained cardiovascular collapse during surgery under general anaesthesia. The patient recovered normally. Postoperatively, neither additional explorations were undertaken nor informations given to the patient. Later on she had to undergo cholecystectomy. Data obtained from preanaesthetic assessment (history, analysis of medical files) were in favour of a past intraoperative allergic accident. Allergological tests confirmed a latex allergy. This case substantiates the importance of a careful preanaesthetic consideration of patient's history and the value of a systematic allergologic exploration after an unexplained intraoperative event compatible with an anaphylactoid reaction. All such events should be clearly explained and a written document handed to the patient.     

2009 Japanese Society of Latex Allergy guidelines for the safe management of latex allergy

Latex allergy is an IgE-mediated reaction to natural latex antigen. Operating room equipment frequently includes medical devices, such as surgical gloves, intravenous lines, and urinary catheters, which are made from latex or contain latex. These products can trigger an allergic reaction that can result in anaphylactic shock. Removal of natural rubber and latex-containing products from the operating room and avoidance of external and internal exposure of patients to latex antigen will prevent such allergic reactions. Updated guidelines for the safe management of latex allergy were published in 2009 by the Japanese Society of Latex Allergy. The previous guidelines regarding this topic were published in 2006. The new guidelines consist of 11 chapters that deal with background, exposure to latex antigen and development of sensitization, high-risk groups, natural rubber products, allergic reactions triggered by natural rubber products, diagnosis, latex-fruit syndrome, countermeasures and treatments in emergencies, prevention and safe management in the hospital, countermeasures in daily life, and limits for application of the guidelines. We had a case that required management according to the 2009 guidelines. A 49-year-old male doctor with a history of allergy to latex gloves was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general and epidural anesthesia for recurrent, acute cholecystitis. The anesthesia and operation were performed uneventfully with latex-free medical devices and machines in a latex-safe environment in the operating room under the new guidelines. Safe anesthetic management under the 2009 guidelines should be available for all operations in Japan on patients with latex allergy.     

Discontinuation of Living Donor Liver Transplantation due to Donor's Intraoperative Latex-Induced Anaphylactic Shock

We report on a 33-year-old female liver donor candidate who developed intraoperative latex-induced anaphylactic shock during surgery for living donor transplantation. She was the mother of the organ recipient, who was a 9-year-old boy with biliary atresia. We planned extended lateral segmentectomy for her. Although we dissected the ligament around the left lobe, the systolic blood pressure suddenly dropped and her body became flushed and warm. We administered transfusion and an ephedrine injection to recover the blood pressure. Because she recovered after the treatment, we restarted the procedure. However, she went into shock again within a few minutes. We decided to discontinue the operation. Postoperative blood tests revealed an increase in IgE-RAST and basophil activation, suggesting that the anaphylactic shock was induced by latex. Because latex allergy has become a public health problem, this allergy should be kept in mind as a potential donor operation risk.     

Latex allergy: a life-threatening epidemic for scientists,healthcare personnel,and their patients

Latex allergy has become a global epidemic, affecting patients, healthcare workers, and scientific personnel. Today, the incidence of latex allergy in healthcare and scientific personnel varies from 17-36%, costing billions of dollars annually to treat. Consequently, it is the purpose of this special report to describe the etiology, immunology, diagnosis, management, prevention, and litigation of cases of latex allergy. The latex allergy epidemic has been attributed to the dramatic increase in glove usage following the establishment of Universal Precautions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because of the latex allergy epidemic, every hospital and scientific research facility should institute a comprehensive emergency treatment program for latex allergic patients, latex-safe areas in their facilities, and a prevention program that includes the wide use of latex-free gloves and the absence of powdered gloves throughout these facilities.     

Prevalence of Latex Allergy among Anesthesiologists: Identification of Sensitized but Asymptomatic Individuals

Background: Occupational exposure to natural rubber latex has led to sensitization of health-care workers. However, the prevalence of latex allergy among occupationally exposed workers in American hospitals has not been reproducibly determined. The objectives of the current study were to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for latex sensitization among a cohort of highly exposed health-care workers.

Methods: Participants were 168 of 171 eligible anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists working in the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. A clinical questionnaire was administered, and testing was performed using a characterized nonammoniated latex reagent for puncture skin testing, a Food and Drug Administration-approved assay to quantify latex-specific immunoglobulin E antibody in serum, and, when required for clarification, a validated two-stage (contact-inhalation) latex glove provocation procedure.

Results: The prevalence of latex allergy with clinical symptoms and latex sensitization without clinical symptoms was 2.4% and 10.1%, respectively. The prevalence of irritant or contact dermatitis was 24%. The risk factors identified for latex sensitization were atopy (odds ratio, 14.1; 95% CI, 1.8-112.1; P = 0.012); history of allergy to selected fruits, such as bananas, avocados, or kiwis (odds ratio, 9.8; 95% CI, 1.6-61.9; P = 0.015); and history of skin symptoms with latex glove use (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.6-13.4; P = 0.006).     

Intraoperative anaphylactic shock due to a latex allergy

Delayed hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals is well known, but there has been an increasing number of reports of immediate-type hypersensitivity due to latex causing contact urticaria, angioedema, bronchial asthma, and anaphylactic shock in adults. We report a 10-year-old boy who developed anaphylactic shock during surgery due to surgical gloves containing latex. The patient was atopic and had a history of neurodermatitis and localized angioedema on exposure to rubber. There had been two previous uneventful surgical procedures. Thirty-five minutes after induction of anesthesia and 5 min after laparotomy for appendectomy there was an acute onset of increased airway pressure, oxygen desaturation, and profound hypotension. The circulation and gas exchange stabilized after treatment with oxygen, intravenous fluids, epinephrine, H1 and H2 blockers, aminophylline, and methylprednisolone. A positive skin test and RAST revealed a latex allergy. Latex can cause life-threatening allergic reactions in patients with a history of rubber allergy or frequent exposure to latex products.     

Latex-related allergy in hemodialysis patients

Abstract

Background: Incidence of allergic reactions is increased in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the prevalence of latex allergy is not exactly known in HD patients. The aim of this present study is to determine the prevalence of latex allergy in HD patients. Methods: A total of 205 adult HD patients were included in the study. Questionnaires were completed during patient interviews, and their consents were provided. Latex prick test and latex specific IgE test (HY-TEC, K82) were performed. Mean age of the patients was 52?±?14 (25–79) years, and 61% was male. Mean dialysis duration was 38 months, and 21% of them were diabetics. Only five patients had allergic complaints in their histories, and none of them had severe anaphylaxis history. Latex prick test was positive in two patients. Latex specific IgE test was positive in five patients. Overall latex sensitivity was defined as 3.4%. Conclusion: No increased prevalence in latex allergy was determined in HD patients. Latex allergy incidence may be increased in atopic HD patients. Therefore, the use of latex products should be avoided as much as possible especially in atopic HD patients.     

Latex anaphylaxis in a myasthenic child undergoing thymectomy

Anaphylactic shock occurred in a 9-year-old myasthenic boy after induction of anesthesia for thymectomy. Resuscitation was successful. Subsequent skin testing identified latex as the cause. Although the patient was not in a high-risk group for latex allergy, detailed questioning confirmed that sensitivity had developed during repeated exposures in previous anesthesia and dental care. Six months later, after taking steroids and antihistaminic drugs prophylactically and avoiding all latex-containing products, the boy underwent uncomplicated thymectomy.The possibility of latex allergy should be borne in mind when dealing with patients previously exposed to repeated medical care. Adequate, latex-free equipment should be available in operating rooms to deal with patients who are allergic to latex.     

Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures. Cloth compared with latex

A randomized prospective study was undertaken to determine the rate of punctures of the inner glove when techniques of double-gloving were employed for orthopaedic operations. Group I consisted of twenty-five procedures in which double latex gloves were used, and Group II comprised another twenty-five in which latex inner gloves and cloth outer gloves were worn. As the outer glove was expected to act as a barrier against puncture of the inner glove, only inner gloves were tested. All glove exchanges done intraoperatively for presumed tears of the inner glove were noted, as were punctures of the skin. The type and length of the procedure were also documented. Group I (double latex gloves) had a significantly higher rate of total inner-glove perforations per procedure (p less than 0.0001) than Group II (cloth and latex gloves). Furthermore, unrecognized perforations were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (p less than 0.01). In Group I, the number of punctures increased with the duration of the operation; a puncture was found in all procedures in which the operation lasted longer than three hours (p less than 0.01). In Group II, only two tears of the inner glove occurred. Both were unrecognized and were independent of the duration of the operation.     

A randomised trial of the durability of non-allergenic latex-free surgical gloves versus latex gloves.

A prospective randomised trial was performed to compare the robustness of a new non-latex surgical glove with a standard latex glove when worn by four general surgeons in a district general hospital. Gloves were retrieved after surgery and examined using the European Standard Test for punctures. The overall puncture rate was 10.1%, and there was no significant difference in the rates between the two types of glove, although punctures in the non-latex glove tended to be larger and more readily noted by the wearer. The increase in latex allergy among health care staff dictates the need for gloves made from other materials, which may also be useful for operations on latex-allergic patients.     

Latex anaphylaxis during tissue expander insertion in a healthy child

Purpose

To report intraoperative latex anaphylaxis that occurred in an otherwise healthy child. Although latex anaphylaxis is seen in patients with myelodysplasia, genitourinary anomalies, sensitised healthcare workers, and patients with frequent exposure to latex, it has not been described in otherwise healthy children.

Clinical features

A nine-year-old girl developed intraoperative latex anaphylaxis manifested by increased airway pressure, expiratory wheezing, a decrease in oxygen saturation, severe hypotension and urticaria. The patient was treated with 5 μg·kg^?1 epinephrine iv and 5 mg·kg^?1 hydrocortisone iv. She required an epinephrine infusion of 0.4 μg·kg^?1 ·min^?1 and prolonged ICU admission. Her only previous latex exposure was during plastic surgical procedures. Latex allergy was confirmed weeks later using the prick method allergy testing.

Conclusion

Latex anaphylaxis can occur in otherwise healthy children whose only latex exposure occurred during a previous operation, including plastic surgery.     

Berufsbedingte Latexallergie

Avoiding powdered latex gloves is generally accepted as being an important way for health service employees to avoid latex-linked allergies affecting the skin and respiratory tract. A questionnaire study was performed to test whether this preventive measure would also be adequate to prevent symptoms in employees with an existing allergy. Using a standardised questionnaire, 329 health service employees with occupational latex allergy were asked about their quality of life, periods without contact with allergens and symptoms related to allergens. At the time when the questionnaire was administered the symptoms were declining markedly. Powdered latex gloves were avoided by all subjects. Seventy-seven per cent of subjects with skin allergy and 68% of subjects with respiratory tract allergy had no allergic symptoms. We conclude therefore that avoiding latex gloves is also an effective preventive measure for insured subjects with existing latex allergy.     

Takayasu's arteritis mimicking acute aortic dissection

A 17-year-old girl presented with a history of dyspnea on exertion and fever of 1-week duration. She was evaluated elsewhere with transesophageal echocardiography and helical computed tomographic scan, and she had been diagnosed with an acute type I dissection of the aorta. She had also been diagnosed with severe aortic regurgitation and a suspected aortic root abscess. On the operating table, we found no evidence of dissection, but we did find that her aorta was severely thickened and inflamed. The patient's aortic valve was replaced. In view of the left main stem ostial stenosis, we harvested and grafted the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery. During the operation it is of paramount importance to rule out dissections involving the arch and coronary ostial narrowing.