A novel gel formulation of clindamycin phosphate-tretinoin is not associated with acne flaring

Concern exists about using topical retinoids on patients with inflammatory acne lesions, fearing that a flare in inflammation will occur. In 3 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trials of a clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-tretinoin 0.025% gel (CLIN/RA), clinical evaluations after 2 weeks of treatment determined if flaring occurred in participants treated with tretinoin gel 0.025% (RA) monotherapy, and the difference in inflammation when treated with the combination formulation. Flaring was assessed as an increase in inflammatory lesions of 10% or greater or 20% or greater versus baseline. Most participants experienced improvement in lesions across treatment groups. Participants with mild acne at baseline treated with RA monotherapy had significantly higher rates of flaring compared with participants treated with vehicle gel (VEH) (P < .001). Treatment with CLIN/RA or clindamycin phosphate gel 1.2% (CLIN) monotherapy resulted in significantly lower rates of flaring than RA or VEH (P < .001 for all). Participants with moderate to severe acne showed no signs of RA-induced flaring. In each comparison, the CLIN/RA combination showed the lowest percentage of increased inflammatory lesions. These results indicate that RA-induced flaring may occur with mild inflammation; combining RA with CLIN prevents this flaring. Participants with moderate to severe inflammatory acne did not show an increase in inflammatory lesions compared with participants treated with VEH. Lack of flaring may result from either the novel vehicle formulation or the antiinflammatory effects of CLIN.     

Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel

Adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (Epiduo?, Tactuo?) is the only fixed-dose combination product available that combines a topical retinoid with benzoyl peroxide; it targets three of the four main pathophysiologic factors in acne. This article reviews the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in the treatment of patients aged ≥ 12 years with acne vulgaris, as well as summarizing its pharmacologic properties. In three 12-week trials in patients aged ≥12 years with moderate acne, success rates were significantly higher with adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel than with adapalene 0.1% gel or benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel alone, and combination therapy had an earlier onset of action. In addition, significantly greater reductions in total, inflammatory, and noninflammatory lesion counts were seen in patients receiving adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel than in those receiving adapalene 0.1% gel or benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel alone. Adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel did not significantly differ from clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel in terms of the reduction in the inflammatory, noninflammatory, or total lesion counts in patients with mild to moderate acne, according to the results of a 12-week trial. Twelve-week studies showed that topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in combination with oral lymecycline was more effective than oral lymecycline alone in patients with moderate to severe acne, and topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in combination with oral doxycycline hyclate was more effective than oral doxycycline hyclate alone in patients with severe acne. In patients with severe acne who responded to 12 weeks’ therapy with topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel plus oral doxycycline hyclate or oral doxycycline hyclate alone, an additional 6 months’ therapy with adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel was more effective than vehicle gel at maintaining response, with further improvement seen in adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel recipients. A noncomparative study also demonstrated the efficacy of 12 months’ therapy with adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in patients with acne vulgaris. Topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel was generally well tolerated in patients with acne. In 12-week trials, the most commonly occurring treatment-related adverse events included erythema, scaling, dryness, and stinging/burning; these dermatologic treatment-related adverse events were usually of mild to moderate severity, occurred early in the course of treatment, and resolved without residual effects. Topical adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel was generally well tolerated in the longer term, with dry skin being the most commonly occurring treatment-related adverse event over 12 months of treatment. In conclusion, adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel is a valuable agent for the first-line treatment of acne vulgaris.     

Efficacy and safety of dapsone gel 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris in adolescents

Two 12-week, randomized, vehicle-controlled. double-blinded pivotal studies and a 12-month. long-term, open-label, noncomparative safety study were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dapsone gel 5% in patients with acne vulgaris. Of 3516 participants enrolled in the 3 trials, 1306 participants (37%) were adolescents aged 12 to 15 years and comprised the subgroup reported here. Participants randomly were assigned to twice-daily treatment with dapsone gel (n=578) or vehicle gel (n=547) in the pivotal studies and received open-label treatment with dapsone gel in the long-term safety study (n=181). In the pivotal studies, success based on achieving a Global Acne Assessment Score (GAAS) of 0 (none) or 1 (minimal) at week 12 was significantly greater for the dapsone gel-treated adolescent participants (40.1%; 232/578) compared with the vehicle gel-treated adolescent participants (28.2%; 154/547) (P<.001). Treatment with dapsone gel in adolescents also resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in acne lesion counts by week 12 in the pivotal studies and for up to 12 months in the long-term safety study. The incidence of adverse events, including application-site events, was low and similar between treatment groups in the pivotal studies and was similarly low in the long-term safety study. Results from the large number of adolescent participants in these 3 studies show that dapsone gel is an effective and safe topical therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris in adolescents aged 12 to 15 years for up to 12 months.     

Adapalene gel 0.1% in the treatment of infantile acne: an open clinical study

Abstract:  Infantile acne is an uncommon condition in pediatric age. We determined the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% in the treatment of infantile acne. Twelve patients were enrolled for adapalene gel 0.1% application once daily over a 16-week treatment period. Efficacy evaluation included counting the inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions by the physician and global evaluation of the improvement. After 16 weeks all patients were followed up for a 1-year period. The time of clearance of the infantile acne lesions was 3 months in four (33%) patients and 4 months in eight (67%) patients (median 3.4 months). Adapalene gel produced reductions in noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions counts. Limited side effects were observed and none of them required stopping the therapy. No patient was left with scarring. Three patients were showed mild lesions in the 1-year follow-up period. Adapalene gel 0.1% was found to be a highly effective and safe drug in the treatment of mild-to-moderate infantile acne.     

Control of microcomedone formation throughout a maintenance treatment with adapalene gel, 0.1%

BACKGROUND: Microcomedones representing the clinically non-visible central precursor lesions of acne are induced by sebaceous hyperplasia as well as altered follicular growth and differentiation, and evolve into both comedones and inflammatory lesions. Thus, targeting microcomedone formation is essential in the prevention and therapeutic control of acne. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of adapalene gel, 0.1%, to control the number of microcomedones after a combination treatment followed by a maintenance treatment. METHODS: This was a single-site exploratory study in subjects with a diagnosis of mild to moderate acne vulgaris and the presence of at least 250 microcomedones per cm(2) at screening visit, counted via cyanoacrylate strips (CyASt). During the first 8 weeks, a combination of adapalene gel (0.1%) and benzoyl peroxide gel (2.5%) was applied. During the randomized, investigator-blinded, and vehicle-controlled 12-week maintenance phase, adapalene once daily (QD), or adapalene alternately with its vehicle once daily every other day (QoD), or vehicle QD were applied to the face. CyASt sampling on the forehead was done at baseline, week 8, and week 20. Lesion counting allowing calculating a defined success rate was done at all visits. RESULTS: A total of 54 subjects entered the combination phase, and 49 subjects were randomized into the maintenance phase: 16 in both the adapalene QD and the QoD group and 17 subjects receiving the vehicle. The microcomedone median count decreased for all groups until week 8 (end of combination phase) from 319 to 157. Microcomedone counts at the end of the maintenance phase (week 20) showed a significant percent difference (P = 0.04) between adapalene QoD (-53.5) and the vehicle (-42.1) and between adapalene QD (-50.6) and the vehicle (P = 0.037) compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: The application of adapalene gel, 0.1% monotherapy daily, or alternately every other day, significantly helps to control the microcomedone count during a 12-week maintenance treatment after a previous combination therapy with benzoyl peroxide in patients with mild to moderate acne.     

Topical nadifloxacin 1% cream vs. topical erythromycin 4% gel in the treatment of mild to moderate acne

Topical antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy in mild to moderate inflammatory acne. Topical erythromycin is one of the most common prescribed topical antibiotics. Nadifloxacin, another topical antibiotic for acne, was recently introduced into the market in our country. In this study, we compared the efficacies and safety of topical nadifloxacin 1% cream and erythromycin 4% gel in acne. A total of 86 patients with mild to moderate facial acne were randomized into two treatment groups. The efficacies of the drugs were assessed by lesion counts. An acne severity index (ASI) was also calculated. In both groups, there was a significant reduction in lesion counts and ASI scores beginning from the first visit at week 4. This reduction continued throughout the 12-week study period. Both treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that when topically applied, both nadifloxacin 1% cream and erythromycin 4% gel are equally effective and safe treatments for mild to moderate facial acne.     

Tretinoin Microsphere Gel 0.04% Pump for Treating Acne Vulgaris in Preadolescents: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Abstract: Although acne vulgaris is common in preadolescents (<13 yrs), few acne treatments are currently approved for children. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of tretinoin microsphere gel (TMG) 0.04% pump in children aged 9–11 with acne vulgaris. In this multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled pilot study, patients applied TMG 0.04% pump or vehicle once daily to the face for 12 weeks. Efficacy measures were changes in facial lesion counts, Investigator Global Evaluation of acne severity using two scales, and Investigator Global Assessment of Improvement from baseline to week 12. Of the 110 patients enrolled, 55 received TMG 0.04% pump, and 55 received vehicle. At week 12, there was significantly greater improvement in the least‐squares mean change in noninflammatory lesions with TMG 0.04% than with vehicle (?19.9 vs ?9.7, p = 0.04) and a significant difference in Investigator Global Assessment of improvement at week 12 between the children treated with TMG 0.04% pump and those treated with vehicle (p = 0.02), but there were no discernible differences in static acne severity scales. Change from baseline in signs and symptoms of cutaneous irritation were similar between the active and vehicle arms at week 12. This study demonstrated statistically significant differences in the reduction of noninflammatory lesions between TMG 0.04% pump and vehicle in patients aged 9–11 with acne vulgaris. Additional studies are warranted to further characterize the safety and efficacy of TMG 0.04% pump for the treatment of acne in the preadolescent population.     

Daily treatment with adapalene gel 0.1% maintains initial improvement of acne vulgaris previously treated with oral lymecycline

Topical retinoids are often recommended for preventing acne recurrence, but there are relatively few well-controlled maintenance studies published. The objective of the present study was to assess the maintenance effect of adapalene gel 0.1% relative to gel vehicle in subjects successfully treated in a previous 12-week adapalene-lymecycline 300 mg combination therapy study. This was a multicentre, investigator-blind, randomised, controlled study in 19 European centres. A total of 136 subjects with moderate to moderately-severe acne vulgaris who showed at least moderate improvement from baseline when treated with either adapalene plus lymecycline or lymecycline plus gel vehicle in a previous 12 week study were included. Subjects were randomised to receive adapalene gel 0.1% or vehicle once-daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety criteria included maintenance rate, percent reduction in lesion counts (total, inflammatory, non inflammatory), global severity assessment, cutaneous tolerability, and adverse events. Adapalene provided better results relative to gel vehicle for all efficacy assessments. The maintenance rate for total lesions was 84.7% vs. 63.5% (P = 0.0049) with adapalene and the vehicle, respectively. Adapalene was safe and well tolerated in this study. This study demonstrates a clinical benefit of continued treatment with adapalene gel 0.1% as a maintenance therapy for acne.     

15 % Azelainsäuregel in der Behandlung der Akne. Zwei doppelblinde klinische Vergleichsstudien

Background: Topical measures are still the mainstay in the therapy of mild‐to‐moderate acne vulgaris. Azelaic acid 20 % in a cream formulation has been established as an efficacious and safe topical drug for 15 years. A new non‐alcoholic hydrogel formulation containing 15 % azelaic acid was clinically tested against two standard drugs – 5 % benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 1 % clindamycin. Patients and Methods: In two independent, randomized, blinded comparative trials 15 % azelaic acid gel was clinically tested against 5 % benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel in 351 patients and against 1 % clindamycin gel in 229 patients. The drugs were applied b. i. d. for 4 months. Results: Azelaic acid 15 % gel proved to be as effective as BPO and clindamycin with median % reduction of the inflamed lesion (papules and pustules) of 70 %, and 71 % respectively. The azelaic acid gel was well‐tolerated, the side effects (local burning and irritation) were distinctly less than with BPO but more pronounced than with clindamycin. Despite these side effects, the treatment was well‐accepted by the majority of patients. Conclusions: Azelaic acid gel is an effective topical monotherapy for mild‐to‐moderate acne vulgaris; its new gel form is an enrichment of acne therapy.     

Adapalene–benzoyl peroxide, a unique fixed-dose combination topical gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a transatlantic, randomized, double-blind, controlled study in 1670 patients

Background  Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0·1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2·5% has recently been developed for the once-daily treatment of acne.
Objectives  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0·1%–BPO 2·5% fixed-dose combination gel (adapalene–BPO) relative to adapalene 0·1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2·5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Methods  In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive adapalene–BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events.
Results  Adapalene–BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild-to-moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient.
Conclusions  Adapalene–BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.     

A double-blind evaluation of topical isotretinoin 0.05%, benzoyl peroxide gel 5% and placebo in patients with acne

A double-blind, randomized study comparing isotretinoin gel (Isotrex), its vehicle base, and benzoyl peroxide was performed on 77 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. The effect of treatment was assessed by acne grade and lesion count. The vehicle base had no effect, but both active groups produced significant improvements. Benzoyl peroxide and isotretinoin significantly reduced non-inflamed lesions at 4 (P < 0.05), 8 (P < 0.01), 12 (P < 0.01) weeks. Benzoyl peroxide had a more rapid effect on inflamed lesions, their being significant reductions at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (P < 0.01), whereas with isotretinoin there was a significant improvement at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). In addition, compared to placebo, both active treatments significantly reduced inflamed and non-inflamed lesions. Acne grade had improved significantly in the benzoyl peroxide group by 4 weeks (P < 0.01) and in the isotretinoin group by 8 weeks (P < 0.05). No significant change in haematological or biochemical parameters occurred. An irritant dermatitis occurred equally with both treatments but was well tolerated by the patients. This data confirms the clinical benefit of benzoyl peroxide in acne. The initial effect of isotretinoin on non-inflamed lesions in this study suggests that the prime mode of action is on comedone formation or separation whereas benzoyl peroxide has an effect on both comedones and inflammation.     

Adapalene gel, 0.1%, as maintenance therapy for acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled, investigator-blind follow-up of a recent combination study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the maintenance effect of adapalene gel, 0.1%, relative to gel vehicle in subjects successfully treated in a previous 12-week study of adapalene-doxycycline, 100 mg, combination therapy. DESIGN: Multicenter, investigator-blind, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Thirty-four US centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 253 subjects with severe acne vulgaris who showed at least moderate improvement from baseline (50% improvement from baseline) when treated with either adapalene plus doxycycline or doxycycline plus gel vehicle in a previous 12-week study. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to receive adapalene gel, 0.1%, or gel vehicle once daily for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy and safety criteria included maintenance rate (subjects maintaining at least 50% improvement in lesion counts from previous therapy), lesion counts (total, inflammatory, and noninflammatory), global severity assessment, cutaneous tolerability, and adverse events. RESULTS: Adapalene maintenance therapy resulted in significantly larger maintenance rates (75% vs 54%; P<.001) and significantly lower lesion counts (total [P = .005], inflammatory [P = .01], and noninflammatory [P = .02]) compared with gel vehicle. Adapalene was safe and well tolerated in this study.Conclusion This study demonstrates a clinical benefit of continued treatment with adapalene gel, 0.1%, as a maintenance therapy for acne.     

A pilot study of the safety and efficacy of picolinic acid gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND: Cost limitations, adverse effects or lack of efficacy limit the use of current topical therapies in mild to moderate acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of picolinic acid, a novel zinc finger therapy, in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate acne vulgaris were treated at our centre during an open-label study with 10% picolinic acid gel (PCL-016) twice daily to the face over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen patients completed the 12-week open-label study. A reduction of 58.2% (P < 0.001) in mean total lesion count, 55.5% (P < 0.001) in mean inflammatory lesion count and 59.7% (P < 0.005) in noninflammatory lesion count was seen in this population. No serious adverse events or clinically significant changes in laboratory values were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that 10% picolinic acid gel applied twice daily may be safe and effective in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.     

Adapalene gel 0.1% is effective and safe for Japanese patients with acne vulgaris: a randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded, controlled study

BACKGROUND: Topical retinoids, such as adapalene, are an integral part of acne therapy in most regions and are considered appropriate first-line therapy by international guidelines for all cases of acne with the exception of the most severe. However, there are currently no topical retinoids available for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japan. OBJECTIVE: To confirm efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% versus the corresponding gel vehicle in the treatment of Japanese patients with acne vulgaris for up to 12 weeks. METHODS: A total of 200 patients were randomized to receive adapalene gel 0.1%, or vehicle once-daily for 12 weeks. Percent reduction in lesion counts (total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory) and subject satisfaction were evaluated. Safety was monitored through adverse events and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Adapalene gel 0.1% produced significantly better reductions in total (P<0.0001), inflammatory (P=0.0010), and non-inflammatory lesions (P<0.0001) at endpoint (week 12, last observation carried forward) than gel vehicle, with a higher overall subject satisfaction. The primary efficacy variable, the median percent reduction of total lesion counts at endpoint, was significantly greater with adapalene gel 0.1% (63.2%) compared to that with the vehicle (36.9%) in the ITT population (P<0.0001). Significantly greater results were observed as early as week 1. Adapalene was well tolerated, with adverse events that were mostly mild-to-moderate and transient in nature. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene gel 0.1% was effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients. Adapalene was safe and well tolerated, consistent with the good tolerability profile demonstrated in other patient populations.     

Sustained efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used long-term (up to 26 weeks) to treat children with atopic dermatitis

Abstract:  Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, inflammatory condition affecting up to 20% of children. Here, we report the long-term extension study of previously published pivotal phase III studies with pimecrolimus cream 1%. Two identical, 26-week studies (6-week, double-blind, followed by 20-week, open-label phases) were conducted in children aged 2 to 17 years with atopic dermatitis. Pooled efficacy and safety analyses were performed. At day 43, 34.8% pimecrolimus-treated patients versus 18.4% in the vehicle group (p < 0.001) were clear/almost clear (Investigators' Global Assessment 0/1) of disease, with significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatment groups for all double-blind visits in all parameters. Pimecrolimus was significantly more effective (based on the Eczema Area and Severity Index) in treating the face and neck versus the rest of the body (p < 0.0001) and versus vehicle (p < 0.0001) in the double-blind phase. Disease control was sustained in the pimecrolimus group throughout the whole study. Patients treated with vehicle during the double-blind phase experienced rapid, marked improvement when switched to pimecrolimus in the open-label phase. The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable between treatment groups. In conclusion, pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective and well tolerated in the long-term control of children with mild to moderately severe atopic dermatitis.     

Sodium L-ascorbyl-2-phosphate 5% lotion for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Background  Antioxidants are becoming increasingly important in the treatment of skin disease. In addition to their known anti-inflammatory effects, antioxidants may act to prevent the oxidation of sebum which has been proposed to be comedogenic in acne patients. Sodium L-ascorbyl-2-phosphate (APS) is a stable vitamin C derivative and highly effective antioxidant that has demonstrated efficacy in acne in open label studies.
Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of APS 5% lotion for the treatment of acne in a blinded controlled study.
Methods  A total of 50 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive APS 5% lotion or vehicle for 12 weeks. Evaluation included an Investigator's Global Assessment Score, a Subjects' Global Assessment Score, lesion counts, cutaneous tolerability, and adverse events.
Results  APS 5% lotion demonstrated statistically significant improvement when compared to vehicle in all of the parameters measured. The adverse event frequency and cutaneous tolerability profile for APS 5% lotion were similar to vehicle.
Limitations  Adjunctive topical or oral agents and their impact on acne were not studied in this trial.
Conclusions  This study demonstrates that 5% sodium L-ascorbyl-2-phosphate is efficacious as monotherapy for the treatment of acne. APS 5% lotion offers a novel addition to our current acne armamentarium.     

Clinical and bacteriological evaluation of adapalene 0.1% gel plus nadifloxacin 1% cream versus adapalene 0.1% gel in patients with acne vulgaris

This multicenter, randomized parallel group study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1% gel plus nadifloxacin 1% cream (combination therapy) compared with adapalene gel (monotherapy) during 12‐week treatment of acne vulgaris. A total of 184 Japanese patients aged above 12 years with moderate to severe acne as indicated by the Japanese severity grading criteria were randomized to combination therapy (n = 84) and monotherapy (n = 100) groups, both having comparable demographic and baseline characteristics. Adapalene was applied only to inflammatory acne lesions in order to minimize skin irritation and ensure the treatment results. Efficacy and safety evaluations, treatment compliance and satisfaction with drug application were periodically monitored. The combination therapy provided a significantly greater efficacy than adapalene in decrement of inflammatory papulopustular lesions at 4 weeks and thereafter (P = 0.0056). The overall judgment of the therapeutic efficacy by the physician at the end of study revealed a significant difference (P = 0.02496) between the groups in favor of combination therapy. Dryness was reported in a greater proportion of patients undergoing monotherapy than combination therapy at weeks 2 and 4 (P = 0.04652). The patient self‐assessment in satisfaction with the drug application at the end of study revealed a significant difference (P = 0.00268) between the groups in favor of combination therapy. Among 76 strains of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from 87 patients, no strain was resistant to nadifloxacin. Thus, the simultaneous use of adapalene and nadifloxacin may provide an additive and complementary effect, resulting in clinical superiority and greater patient adherence compared to adapalene monotherapy.     

Prospective, open-label, comparative study of clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel with adapalene 0.1% gel in Asian acne patients: efficacy and tolerability

Background  Used as individual agents, topical antibiotics and benzoyl peroxide are known to be effective in treatment of acne. Clindamycin phosphate 1% with benzoyl peroxide 5% (CDP/BPO) is a new combination gel, made by rationale, in that combination drug is more effective than either ingredients used alone. Adapalene 0.1% (ADA) is the third-generation retinoid, shown to be as effective as other topical retinoid with well tolerability.
Objectives  To compare the efficacy and tolerability in combination of CDP/BPO in comparison with ADA in Asian patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris.
Methods  Total of 69 patients, including 31 patients for CDP/BPO group and 38 for ADA group, with mild to moderate acne vulgaris were enrolled for a 12-week prospective, randomized, open-label comparative study of topical agents. Efficacy was assessed by lesion counts, acne grading system, and global improvement. Adverse events were also evaluated in scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Results  Both CDP/BPO and ADA were effective in reducing lesion counts and acne severity scale and showed significant global improvement. However, CDP/BPO offered greater efficacy against inflammatory lesions than ADA. Both drugs were well tolerated with minimal adverse drug reactions.
Conclusion  Combination formulation of CDP/BPO and ADA were shown to be both effective in decreasing total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory lesion counts along with well tolerability in Asian patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

Conflicts of interest

None declared     

Comparison of micronized tretinoin gel 0.05% and tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1% in young adolescents with acne: a post hoc analysis of efficacy and tolerability data

Acne vulgaris is common in young adolescents. Retinoids are widely used but may be associated with poor tolerability. This post hoc analysis of 483 participants aged 10 to 14 years with mild to moderate acne compared efficacy and tolerability of once-daily treatment with micronized tretinoin gel 0.05%, tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1%, and vehicle over 12 weeks. In study 1, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion reduction and treatment success was comparable between tretinoin gel 0.05% and tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1%. Inflammatory (46.3%) and noninflammatory (45.7%) lesion reductions with tretinoin gel 0.05% were significantly greater than vehicle (37.1% and 27.9%, respectively) (both P<.001). In study 2, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion reductions and treatment success with tretinoin gel 0.05% (30.6%, 39.1%, and 19%, respectively) were significantly greater than vehicle (10.9%, 16.9% [both P<.001], and 4% [P=.008], respectively). Tretinoin gel 0.05% was significantly better tolerated than tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1% (P<.001); the majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild, occurring in the first 2 weeks. Fourteen percent of participants reported dry skin, 8% skin burning sensation, 5% erythema, and 5% dermatitis exfoliative with tretinoin gel 0.05% compared with 32%, 11%, 23%, and 23%, respectively, with tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1% (all P<.001, except skin burning sensation). In this secondary analysis of acne in young adolescents aged 10 to 14 years, micronized tretinoin gel 0.05% provided a comparable lesion reduction and treatment success versus tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1%, with a better cutaneous tolerability profile.     

0.1%阿达帕林凝胶和1%克林霉素溶液联合外用治疗寻常痤疮临床观察

目的:比较0.1%阿达帕林凝胶(达芙文)与1%克林霉素磷酸酯溶液(特丽仙)联合外用与特丽仙单用治疗寻常痤疮的疗效和安全性。方法:将300例中至重度寻常痤疮患者分为两组,试验组联合外用达芙文和特丽仙,对照组单用特丽仙,两组共治疗12周。结果:274例患者完成治疗,治疗4周后试验组皮损总数改善显著优于对照组(P<0.05),并维持至12周;治疗8周后试验组炎性皮损和非炎性皮损改善优于对照组(P<0.01),并维持至12周。治疗结束后试验组和对照组的有效率分别为84.40%和72.93%(P<0.05)。试验组局部刺激反应发生率为4.0%,对照组为8.7%。结论:达芙文联合特丽仙治疗中至重度寻常痤疮的疗效比单用特丽仙的效果好。