下颈椎经关节螺钉联合侧块或椎弓根螺钉固定的效果

目的 探讨在下颈椎经颈后正中入路应用经关节螺钉联合侧块螺钉或椎弓根螺钉行内固定治疗的固定效果.方法 2003年2月至2007年10月,对22例患者通过后路应用经关节螺钉联合侧块螺钉或椎弓根螺钉行内固定治疗,男14例,女8例;年龄24～73岁,平均43岁.其中下颈椎创伤性骨折脱位13例,颈椎后纵韧带骨化症4例,颈椎管狭窄伴Ⅱ型齿突骨折1例,颈椎间盘突出伴椎管狭窄4例.结果 共置入经关节螺钉45枚,其中C4,5 2枚,C5,639枚,C6,74枚;共置入侧块螺钉12枚,C3、C4各6枚;共置入椎弓根螺钉41枚,其中C24枚,C32枚,C46枚,C721枚,T18枚.术中所有螺钉均成功置入,未出现椎动脉、神经根和脊髓损伤等置钉相关并发症.22例患者均获随访,随访时间10个月～3年8个月,平均17个月.植骨融合时间3～5个月,平均3.5个月.术后发现1例患者的2枚经关节螺钉松动,部分脱出.经加强颈托制动,术后4个月获得融合.结论 通过后路固定下颈椎时,采用经关节螺钉联合侧块螺钉或椎弓根螺钉固定,均可取得较好的固定效果.     

下颈椎后路3种固定技术的拔出强度研究

目的评价下颈椎后路侧块螺钉、椎弓根螺钉、经关节螺钉3种固定方法的拔出强度。方法6具新鲜颈椎尸体标本（C3～C7）,分别用侧块螺钉Roy-Camille法（LMS）、椎弓根螺钉（TPS）和经关节螺钉植入法（TAS）拧入螺钉,使用万能材料实验机,以100、200、300、400、500、600N分级加载,以18mm/min加载速度进行螺钉拔出实验,测试其最大拔出力、最大拔出能量。结果LMS最大拔出力为（426±38）N,最大拔出能量为（5.26±0.39）J;TPS最大拔出力为（502±42）N,最大拔出能量为（7.18±0.67）J;TAS最大拔出力为（482±40）N,最大拔出能量为（6.68±0.47）J。LMS的最大拔出力和最大拔出能量均小于TPS和TAS（P〈0.05）,而TPS和TAS之间相近,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论经关节螺钉拔出强度优于侧块螺钉,而椎弓根螺钉拔出强度最大。     

Safety of atlantoaxial fusion using laminar and transarticular screws combined with an atlas hook in a patient with unilateral vertebral artery occlusion (case report)

Objective and importance  A disadvantage of transarticular and C2 pedicle screws is vertebral artery (VA) injury as a result of screw misplacement. If unilateral occlusion of the VA is present, VA injury of the dominant side will cause fatal complications as a result of collateral flow insufficiency. Several authors have recently reported the usefulness of C2 laminar screws because of their safety on VA injury. We used transarticular and C2 laminar screws combined with the atlas hook in a patient with C1-2 instability and unilateral VA occlusion, in order to reduce the risk of further VA injury. Clinical presentation  A 64-year-old woman with rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation complained of cervical myelopathy and neck pain. Preoperative MR angiography showed a left side VA occlusion. Technique  The patient underwent atlantoaxial, posterior fusion using a transarticular screw on the side of the occlusion and a C2 laminar screw on the dominant side combined with a bilateral atlas hook. The transarticular screw was inserted using a navigation system and image intensifier, and the laminar screw was inserted free hand. Bone grafting from the iliac crest was performed. Conclusion  Transarticular and C2 laminar screws fixation combined with the atlas hook in a patient with unilateral VA occlusion is a useful technique, in order to reduce the risk of further VA injury.     

Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine

Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine has become increasingly popular in recent years. Dissatisfaction with lateral mass fixation, especially at the cervico-thoracic junction, has led spine surgeons to use pedicle screws. The improved biomechanical stability of pedicle screws and transarticular C1/2 screws allows for shorter instrumentations and improves the repositioning possibilities. Nevertheless, there are potential risks of iatrogenic damage to the spinal cord, nerve roots or the vertebral artery with both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether C1/2 transarticular screws and transpedicular screws can be applied safely and with high accuracy in the cervical spine and the cervico-thoracic junction using a computer-assisted surgery system (CAS system). Posterior instrumentation was performed using the Brainlab VectorVision System (BrainLAB , Heimstetten, Germany) in 19 patients. Surface matching was used for registration. We placed 22 transarticular screws C1/2, 31 cervical pedicle screws, 10 high thoracic pedicle screws and one lateral mass screw C1. The screw position was evaluated postoperatively using CT with multiplanar reconstruction in the screw axis of each screw. None of the transarticular screws or pedicle screws was significantly (>2 mm) misplaced and no screw-related injury to vascular, neurogenic or bony structures was observed. No screw revision was necessary. The mean operation time was 144 min (90–240 min) and the mean blood loss was 234 ml (50–800 ml). C1/2 transarticular screws, as well as transpedicular screws in the cervical spine and the cervico-thoracic junction, can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a CAS system. Computer-assisted instrumentation is recommended especially for pedicle screws at C3–C6.     

寰枢椎后路固定技术研究进展

寰枢椎不稳是由炎症、创伤、先天性疾病、肿瘤或退变引起的脊柱生物力学异常改变,常常需要手术固定。最初的后路钢丝固定技术操作安全,但术后需要较长时间外固定制动,并且不融合率高。螺钉固定技术(经关节螺钉、寰枢椎侧块和椎弓根钉技术)融合率高、不需要坚强的术后制动,但是其技术要求高。枢椎椎板螺钉能坚强固定寰枢椎复合体,可作为枢椎椎弓根螺钉的补充固定技术。文中将复习寰枢椎复合体后路固定的发展史和各种技术,同时讨论各自的成功率及其并发症。     

Biomechanical analysis of a novel hook-screw technique for C1-2 stabilization

The Food and Drug Administration has not cleared the following medical devices for the use described in this study. The following medical devices are being discussed for an off-label use: cervical lateral mass screws. Object As an alternative for cases in which the anatomy and spatial relationship between C-2 and a vertebral artery precludes insertion of C-2 pedicle/pars or C1-2 transarticular screws, a technique that includes opposing laminar hooks (claw) at C-2 combined with C-1 lateral mass screws may be used. The biomechanical stability of this alternate technique was compared with that of a standard screw-rod technique in vitro. Methods Flexibility tests were performed in 7 specimens (occiput to C-3) in the following 6 different conditions: 1) intact; 2) after creating instability and attaching a posterior cable/graft at C1-2; 3) after removing the graft and attaching a construct comprising C-1 lateral mass screws and C-2 laminar claws; 4) after reattaching the posterior cable-graft at C1-2 (posterior hardware still in place); 5) after removing the posterior cable-graft and laminar hooks and placing C-2 pedicle screws interconnected to C-1 lateral mass screws via rod; and 6) after reattaching the posterior cable-graft at C1-2 (screw-rod construct still in place). Results All types of stabilization significantly reduced the range of motion, lax zone, and stiff zone compared with the intact condition. There was no significant biomechanical difference in terms of range of motion or lax zone between the screw-rod construct and the screw-claw-rod construct in any direction of loading. Conclusions The screw-claw-rod technique restricts motion much like the standard Harms technique, making it an acceptable alternative technique when aberrant arterial anatomy precludes the placement of C-2 pars/pedicle screws or C1-2 transarticular screws.     

Computer-assisted screw insertion for cervical disorders in rheumatoid arthritis

To reconstruct highly destructed unstable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cervical lesions, the authors have been using C1/2 transarticular and cervical pedicle screw fixations. Pedicle screw fixation and C1/2 transarticular screw fixation are biomechanically superior to other fixation techniques for RA patients. However, due to severe spinal deformity and small anatomical size of the vertebra, including the lateral mass and pedicle, in the most RA cervical lesions, these screw fixation procedures are technically demanding and pose the potential risk of neurovascular injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion to the deformed, fragile, and small RA spine lesions using computer-assisted image-guidance systems. A frameless, stereotactic image-guidance system that is CT-based, and optoelectronic was used for correct screw placement. A total of 21 patients (16 females, 5 males) with cervical disorders due to RA were surgically treated using the image-guidance system. Postoperative computerized tomography and plane X-ray was used to determine the accuracy of the screw placement. Neural and vascular complications associated with screw insertion and postoperative neural recovery were evaluated. Postoperative radiological evaluations revealed that only 1 (2.1%; C4) of 48 screws inserted into the cervical pedicle had perforated the vertebral artery canal more than 25% (critical breach). However, no neurovascular complications were observed. According to Ranawat's classification, 9 patients remained the same, and 12 patients showed improvement. Instrumentation failure, loss of reduction, or nonunion was not observed at the final follow-up (average 49.5 months; range 24-96 months). In this study, the authors demonstrated that image-guidance systems could be applied safely to the cervical lesions caused by RA. Image-guidance systems are useful tools in preoperative planning and in transarticular or transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine of RA patients.     

Posterior fixation and fusion with atlas pedicle screw system for upper cervical diseases

Objective： To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of atlas pedicle screws system fixation and fusion for the treatment of upper cervical diseases.
Methods： Twenty-three consecutive patients with upper cervical disorders requiring stabilization, including 19 cases of atlantoaxial dislocation （4 congenital odontoid disconnections, 6 old odontoid fractures, 4 fresh odontoid fractures of Aderson Ⅱ C, 3 ruptures of the C1 transverse ligament, and 2 fractures of C1）, 2 cases of C2 tumor （instability after the resection of the tumors）, and 2 giant neurilemomas of C2-C3（instability after resection of the tumors）, were treated by posterior fixation and fusion with the atlas pedicle screw system, in which the screws were inserted through the posterior arch of C1. The operative time, bleeding volume and complications were reported. All patients were immobilized without external fixation or with rigid cervical collars for 1-3 months. All patients were followed up and evaluated with radiographs and CT.
Results： In the 23 patients, 46 C1 pedicle screws, 42 C2 pedicle screws and 6 lower cervical lateral mass screws and 2 lower cervical pedicle screws were placed. The mean operative time and bleeding volume was 2.7 hours and 490 ml respectively. No intraoperative complications were directly related to surgical technique. No neurological, vascular or infective complications were encountered. All patients were followed up for 3-36 months （average 15 months）. Firm bony fusion was documented in all patients after 3-6 months. One patient with atlas fracture showed anterior occipitocervical fusion. There was no implant failure. Conclusions： Posterior fixation and fusion of the atlas pedicle screw system is feasible and safe for the treatment of upper cervical diseases, and may be applicable to a larger number of patients.     

组合枢椎椎板螺钉及经枢椎椎板关节突螺钉固定技术的临床应用

目的探讨组合枢椎椎板螺钉及经枢椎椎板关节突螺钉(TLFS)固定技术治疗颈椎损伤的可行性和应用价值。方法自2005年10月～2008年10月,采用枢椎椎板螺钉及经枢椎TLFS固定技术治疗颈椎损伤36例。结果本组获随访13~32个月,平均18个月。30例行自体髂骨植骨,6例行异体骨植骨,获得了良好的骨性愈合。术后CT示枢椎椎板螺钉及经枢椎TLFS位置良好,未侵犯椎管和脊髓。结论枢椎椎板螺钉及经枢椎TLFS固定技术不受C2横突孔中椎动脉的位置和C2椎弓根大小限制,避免了螺钉置入过程中损伤椎动脉的风险,所以该方法可作为传统枢椎后路螺钉固定技术的补充。     

枢椎椎板螺钉在上颈椎后路固定术中的应用

目的探讨枢椎椎板螺钉固定术应用于上颈椎后路融合内固定术中的可行性。方法回顾性分析本院2012年1月—2014年12月在上颈椎后路融合固定术中采用枢椎椎板螺钉固定的19例患者资料,术中根据枢椎椎弓根是否存在缺如、细小等情况,选择置入双侧枢椎椎板螺钉或单侧枢椎椎板螺钉并对侧椎弓根螺钉,联合枕骨板螺钉和/或寰椎侧块螺钉。15例上颈椎畸形患者均有不同程度脊髓功能损害表现,日本骨科学会(JOA)评分为5~15分,平均11.5分。4例外伤性寰枢椎骨折患者有后颈部疼痛及活动障碍,疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分为2~7分,平均4.5分。术后复查患者影像学资料,观察内固定位置及植骨融合情况。结果所有手术顺利完成,未发生椎动脉、脊髓等损伤。术后复查CT,显示所有枢椎椎板螺钉位置良好,均未突破内侧皮质骨。随访时X线、CT示螺钉位置良好,无松动及断钉。所有患者术后12个月植骨均融合,上颈椎畸形患者神经功能均有不同程度改善,JOA评分为13~17分,平均15.3分。外伤性寰枢椎骨折患者颈部疼痛及活动障碍明显改善,VAS评分为0~2分,平均1.0分。结论枢椎椎板螺钉固定在上颈椎后路固定手术中方法简单安全、效果良好,对于无法行枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定的患者,枢椎椎板螺钉固定是一种安全有效的替代方法。     

Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note

Rigid screw fixation of the axis, for either atlantoaxial fixation or for incorporation of C2 into subaxial cervical constructs, provides significant stability and excellent long-term fusion results but remains technically demanding due to the danger of injury to the vertebral artery. Anatomic variability of the foramen transversarium in the body of the axis can preclude safe transarticular C1-C2 screw placement in up to 20% of patients. Although more recent methods of C2 screw fixation with pedicle screws allow safer fixation in a higher number of patients, there remains a significant risk to the vertebral artery with C2 pedicle screw placement. The author describes a novel technique of C2 rigid screw fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws, not previously reported in the literature, which does not place the vertebral artery at risk during C2 fixation. This technique has been successfully used by the author in cases of craniocervical and atlantoaxial fixation as well as for incorporation of C2 into subaxial fixations. The technique is illustrated, and the author's initial experience in treating 10 patients with crossing, bilateral C2 aminar screws for indications of trauma, neoplasm, pseudarthrosis, and degenerative disease is reviewed. The possible advantages of C2 fixation with C2 laminar screws are discussed.     

A finite element investigation of upper cervical instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: The finite element technique was used to predict changes in biomechanics that accompany the application of a novel instrumentation system designed for use in the upper cervical spine. OBJECTIVE: To determine alterations in joint loading, kinematics, and instrumentation stresses in the craniovertebral junction after application of a novel instrumentation system. Specifically, this design was used to assess the changes in these parameters brought about by two different cervical anchor types: C2 pedicle versus C2-C1 transarticular screws, and unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Arthrodesis procedures can be difficult to obtain in the highly mobile craniovertebral junction. Solid fusion is most likely achieved when motion is eliminated. Biomechanical studies have shown that C1-C2 transarticular screws provide good stability in craniovertebral constructs; however, implantation of these screws is accompanied by risk of vertebral artery injury. A novel instrumentation system that can be used with transarticular screws or with C2 pedicle screws has been developed. This design also allows for unilateral or bilateral implantation. However, the authors are unaware of any reports to date on the changes in joint loading or instrumentation stresses that are associated with the choice of C2 anchor or unilateral/bilateral use. METHODS: A ligamentous, nonlinear, sliding contact, three-dimensional finite element model of the C0-C1-C2 complex and a novel instrumentation system was developed. Validation of the model has been previously reported. Finite element models representing combinations of cervical anchor type (C1-C2 transarticular screws vs. C2 pedicle screws) and unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation were evaluated. All models were subjected to compression with pure moments in either flexion, extension, or lateral bending. Kinematic reductions with respect to the intact (uninjured and without instrumentation) case caused by instrumentation use were reported. Changes in loading profiles through the right and left C0-C1 and C1-C2 facets, transverse ligament-dens, and dens-anterior ring of C1 articulations were calculated by the finite element model. Maximum von Mises stresses within the instrumentation were predicted for each model variant and loading scenario. RESULTS: Bilateral instrumentation provided greater motion reductions than the unilateral instrumentation. When used bilaterally, C2 pedicle screws approximate the kinematic reductions and instrumentation stresses (except in lateral bending) that are seen with C1-C2 transarticular screws. The finite element model predicted that the maximum stress was always in the region in which the plate transformed into the rod. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of predicting changes in loading in the upper cervical spine caused by instrumentation. The most significant conclusion that can be drawn from the finite element model predictions is that C2 pedicle screw fixation provides the same relative stability and instrumentation stresses as C1-C2 transarticular screw use. C2 pedicle screws can be a good alternative to C2-C1 transarticular screws when bilateral instrumentation is applied.     

颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定与标准椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较

目的 比较颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定和标准椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度.方法 取10具新鲜尸体颈椎标本(C_3～T_1),游离成三个颈椎运动节段(C_(3,4),C_(5,6),C_7T_1).在椎体两侧随机进行经关节椎弓根螺钉固定或标准椎弓根螺钉固定,置入直径3.5 mm皮质骨螺钉.经关节椎弓根螺钉固定以上位椎骨侧块外下象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉在冠状面内倾约45°、矢状面尾倾约50°.由上位椎骨下关节突经关节突关节、下位椎骨的椎弓根,进入下位椎骨的椎体内.标准椎弓根螺钉固定以侧块外上象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉方向参考CT测量结果 ,尽量与椎弓根倾斜角度保持一致,在横断面上内倾约45°、矢状面上螺钉指向椎体的上1/3.在生物力学试验机上行拔出强度试验,比较两种螺钉固定的最大轴向拔出力.结果 颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定平均最大轴向拨出力为(694±42)N,标准椎弓根螺钉固定为(670±36)N,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 颈椎后路经关节椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度大干标准椎弓根螺钉固定,从生物力学强度方面考虑经关节椎弓根螺钉固定可以作为标准椎弓根螺钉固定的一种补充方法.     

Operative techniques for the management of traumatic instability in the cervical spine

Operative techniques to treat traumatic cervical instability have evolved with the development of techniques, such as occipital segmental plating, C1 lateral mass screws, a variety of C2 fixation techniques, C1/C2 transarticular screw fixation, in addition to lateral mass and pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine. These advances have led to benefits, such as improved construct strength and enhanced biomechanical stability. In the current era, it is essential to have a good familiarity with the types of instrumentation available and a comprehensive understanding of the regional anatomy to avoid complications and optimize clinical outcomes.     

两种长度的颈椎椎弓根螺钉与侧块螺钉拔出试验比较

目的:比较两种长度的颈椎椎弓根螺钉和侧块螺钉的抗拔出力,探讨颈椎经椎弓根短螺钉固定的可行性。方法:5具C3~C5共15节新鲜颈椎标本,用长度为28mm和20mm的皮质骨螺钉分别置入椎弓根,并用20mm的螺钉行侧块双皮质固定,螺钉进入侧块深度约14mm。行拔出试验,比较螺钉的最大轴向拔出力。结果:椎弓根长螺钉的最大拔出力为650N,椎弓根短螺钉为585N,两者比较无显著性差异(P>0.01);侧块螺钉的最大拔出力为360N,与椎弓根短螺钉比较有显著性差异(P<0.0001)。结论:颈椎椎弓根短螺钉固定可提供足够的稳定性,其安全性相对较高。     

In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2-3 instrumentation

OBJECT: In instrumentation of the upper cervical spine, placement of pedicle screws into C-2 is generally safe, although there is the potential for injury to the vertebral arteries. Owing to this risk, translaminar screws into C-2 have been used. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of the in vitro cadaveric spine using C-2 laminar compared with C-2 pedicle screws in C2-3 instrumentation. METHODS: Eight fresh frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C1-6) were potted at C1-2 and C5-6. Pure moments in increments of 0.3 Nm to a maximum of 1.5 Nm were applied in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Each specimen was tested sequentially in three modes: 1) intact; 2) C2 pedicle screw-C3 lateral mass fixation; and 3) C2 laminar screw-C3 lateral mass fixation. The sequence of fixation testing was randomized. Motion was tracked with reflective markers attached to C-2 and C-3. RESULTS: Spinal levels with instrumentation showed significantly less motion than the intact spine in all directions and with all loads greater than 0.3 Nm (p < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between C2 pedicle screw-C3 lateral mass fixation and C2 laminar screw-C3 lateral mass fixation, generally the former type of fixation was associated with less motion than the latter. CONCLUSIONS: When pedicle screws in C-2 are contraindicated or inappropriate, laminar screws in C-2 offer a safe and acceptable option for posterior instrumentation.     

Percutaneous transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation using a cannulated screw system and image guidance.

In 2000 a cannulated screw stabilization system for posterior cervical instrumentation was introduced in our department for use in complex cervical fixation procedures. A special feature of the system is the use of thin Kirschner wires for drilling the screw paths and then placing the self-drilling, cannulated screws securely over the wires. Percutaneous application of C1-C2 transarticular screws is possible through tubes. An optional "atlas-claw" provides additional stability in cases of C1-C2 stabilization. 17 patients (10 female, 7 male, mean age 60 years) with complex cervical disorders and instability of different origin were stabilized using the Neon System (Ulrich Co., Ulm, Germany). Pathology included atlantoaxial instability based on rheumatoid arthritis (n = 12), odontoid fracture (n = 4) and os odontoideum mobile (n = 1). Computed navigation (STN 4.0, Zeiss or vector vision spine, brain lab) was used in 14 cases. Transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation was performed in 14 cases (4 patients with direct C1 massa lateralis screw fixation), craniocervical fixation (C0-C2/C3) was done in 3 patients. Percutaneous application of the C1-C2 screws was used in 7 patients. Atlas claws were applied in 8 patients. There was one medial perforation of a C2 pedicle wall and one malposition of the screw in C2 without reaching the lateral mass of C1. After a mean follow-up of 9 months there were no hardware failures and stable fusion in those cases followed after 12 months or more. Clinical results were excellent or good in 14/16 patients. Cannulated screws are an effective alternative in complex stabilization procedures of the cervical spine. The presented system is technically comfortable and allows safe percutaneous screw application as well as inclusion of computed navigation with high accuracy.     

Translaminar screws of the axis—an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability

C2 pedicle screws or transarticular atlantoaxial screws are technically demanding and carry an increased risk of vertebral artery injury. In up to 20% of cases, pedicle and transarticular screw placement is not possible due to a high-riding vertebral artery or very small C2 pedicles in addition to other anatomical variations. Translaminar screws have been reported to rigidly capture posterior elements of C2 and therefore appear to be a suitable alternative. We present our first experiences and clinical results with this new method in two neurosurgical spine centers. Twenty-seven adult patients were treated between 2007 and 2010 in two neurosurgical spine departments with C2 translaminar screw fixation for upper cervical spine instability of various origins (e.g., trauma, tumor, dens pseudarthrosis). Eight patients were men and 19 were women. Mean age was 68.9 years. In most cases, translaminar screws were used because of contraindications for pedicle or transarticular screws as a salvage technique. All patients were clinically assessed and had CT scans postoperatively to verify correct screw placement. Follow-up was performed with reexamination on an ambulatory basis. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months for all patients. In 27 patients, 52 translaminar screws were placed. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we identified four screw malpositions using a new accuracy grading scale. One screw had to be revised because of violation of the spinal canal >4 mm. None of the patients had additional neurological deficits postoperatively, and all showed stable cervical conditions at follow-up. Two patients died due to causes not associated with the stabilization technique. The fusion rate for patients with C1/C2 fixation is 92.9%. Translaminar screws can be used at least as an additional technique for cases of upper cervical spine instability when pedicle screw placement is contraindicated or not possible. The current data suggest comparable biomechanical stability and fusion rates of translaminar screws to other well-known posterior fixation procedures. In addition, translaminar screw placement is technically less demanding and reduces the risk of vertebral artery injury.     

Freehand C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique: our experience

Background

Although C1 lateral mass fixation technique is frequently performed in upper cervical instabilities, it requires the guidance of fluoroscopic imaging. The fluoroscopy guidance is time-consuming and has the risks of accumulative radiation. Biplane fluoroscopy is also difficult in upper cervical pathologic conditions because of the use of cranial fixations. This study aimed to demonstrate that unicortical C1 lateral mass screws could be placed safely and rapidly without fluoroscopy guidance.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2008, 32 C1 lateral mass screws were inserted in 17 consecutive patients with various pathologic conditions involving either atlantoaxial or occipitocervical instability.

Results

C1 screw lengths ranged from 18 to 32 mm. The atlantoaxial fixation was performed in 13 patients, and C1 lateral mass screws were added to the occipitocervical construct in 3 patients, to the posterior cervical construct in 2 patients, and to the cervicothoracic construct in 1 patient. In 2 patients, because C1 lateral mass screws could not be inserted unilaterally, C1 pedicle screw analogs were inserted. There were no screw malpositions or neurovascular complications related to screw insertion. Operation time and intraoperative bleeding of the isolated atlantoaxial fixations were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 32.3 months (range, 7-59 months). No screw loosening or construct failure was observed within this period. Postoperatively, 4 patients complained of hypoesthesia, whereas one patient had superficial wound infection.

Conclusion

C1 lateral mass screws may be used safely and rapidly in upper cervical instabilities without intraoperative fluoroscopy guidance and the use of the spinal navigation systems. Preoperative planning and determining the ideal screw insertion point, the ideal trajections, and the lengths of the screws are the most important points.     

借助于枢椎椎板钉重建寰枢关节稳定的初步临床报告

目的 探讨以枢椎椎板置钉法完成寰枢或枕颈固定,用以治疗寰枢关节不稳的可行性.方法 对枢椎椎弓根畸形或椎动脉异位的病例以枢椎椎板置钉的方法 完成寰枢或枕颈固定.如果一侧枢椎椎弓根是大致正常的,就在该侧用椎弓根钉固定,在对侧用枢椎椎板钉固定.在寰椎以侧块螺钉固定,在枕骨以短螺钉固定.用连接棒在寰枢或枕枢间连接.在寰枢后弓间或枕骨与枢椎椎弓间植入颗粒状松质骨.结果 共完成了9个病例,其中寰枢固定2例,枕颈固定7例.使用一侧枢椎椎弓根钉固定、另一侧枢椎椎板钉固定6例,两侧均为椎板钉固定3例.9例均得到随访,随访时间4-13个月(平均9个月).所有病例均得到骨性融合.有神经症状的8例中,症状改善情况为:优3例,良1例,可2例,无变化2例.1例椎板钉进入了椎管.所有病例均没有出现脊髓和椎动脉损伤症状.结论 枢椎椎板置钉操作简便、安全,固定效果可靠.可以作为枢椎椎弓根置钉固定的后备方法 ,适用于椎弓根畸形或椎动脉异位的病例.