Karyotypic evolution in breast carcinomas with i(1)(q10) and der(1;16)(q10;p10) as the primary chromosome abnormality.

The pattern of clonal karyotypic evolution in breast carcinomas carrying an i(1q) or a der(1;16)(q10;p10) as the primary chromosome abnormality was assessed in a series of 42 tumors, including 8 described here for the first time, with either or both (3 tumors) of them defining cytogenetic features. Evidence of clonal evolution was seen in somewhat more than half of all cases in both subgroups. The secondarily acquired aberrations appeared to be nonrandom in distribution. This was especially so for structural rearrangements of 11q leading to loss of material from this arm, which were clearly more common in both subgroups than in karyotypically abnormal breast carcinomas in general. Other deviations from random were less certain but seemed to include the frequent occurrence of +20 in tumors with i(1q) and +7 in tumors with der(1;16)(q10;p10). That differences were observed between i(1q) carcinomas and der(1;16)(q10;p10) carcinomas with regard to their patterns of clonal evolution hints that the pathogenetic effect of the primary change in these two situations may be more than the mere gain of an extra copy of 1q.     

Highly recurrent der(1;16)(q10;p10) and other 16q arm alterations in lobular breast cancer

Cytogenetic data on infiltrating lobular carcinomas (ILCs) of the breast are described. In addition to 9 tumors, including 2 bilateral ones, with apparently normal chromosomes, recurrent chromosome alterations were found among 18 tumors. A der(1;16)(q10;p10), resulting in 1q gain and 16q loss, was observed in 11 tumors. Chromosome arm 16q was lost by other rearrangements in 3 other tumors. Thus, the deletion of 16q appears to be highly recurrent in ILCs. Compared to infiltrating ductal carcinomas (IDCs), ILCs have fairly simple karyotypes that remain pseudo- or near-diploid in most cases. This finding is confirmed by DNA ploidy studied by flow cytometry, which shows that about half of the tumors are diploid. This makes the der(1;16)(q10;p10) and other alterations of the 16q arm an early alteration of tumor progression, possibly related to the loss of expression of E-cadherin, whose gene is mapped on the 16q arm. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 23:300–306, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Karyotypic heterogeneity and clonal evolution in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are often characterized by complex karyotypic changes, and a substantial proportion of the reported tumors have shown intratumor heterogeneity in the form of cytogenetically related (40%) or unrelated clones (20%). In order to study intratumor heterogeneity and to distinguish the temporal order of chromosome rearrangements in these tumors, two or more samples from different areas of the same tumor were separately examined in 19 HNSCC, yielding karyotypes from a total of 42 tumor samples. Intrasample heterogeneity was observed in 16 samples. Two samples displayed both related and unrelated multiple clones, four samples showed only multiple unrelated clones, and the remaining 10 samples had only related subclones. Intersample heterogeneity was detected in all but one tumor. Five tumors showed both cytogenetically related and unrelated multiple clones, 11 were found to have only related subclones, and the remaining two tumors showed only unrelated clones. Clonal evolution could be assessed in 13 tumors. A comparison of chromosome imbalances in different subclones from these tumors suggests that partial or entire loss of 3p, 8p, 9p, and 18q and gain of genetic material from 3q and 8q are likely to be early genetic events. In contrast, loss of 1q, 6p, 7q, and chromosome 10, as well as gain of chromosome arms 5p and 7p, are most probably later genetic events. One of the examined tumors contained two highly complex clones that were cytogenetically unrelated, indicating that this tumor had a multicellular origin.     

Allelic imbalance study of 16q in human primary breast carcinomas using microsatellite markers

The high incidence of allelic imbalance on the long arm of chromosome 16 in breast cancer suggests its involvement in the development and progression of the tumor. Several loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies have led to the assignment of commonly deleted regions on 16q where tumor suppressor genes may be located. The most recurrent LOH regions have been 16q22.1 and 16q22.4-qter. The aim of this study was to gain further insight into the occurrence of one or multiple “smallest regions of overlap” on 16q in a new series of breast carcinomas. Hence, a detailed allelic imbalance map was constructed for 46 sporadic breast carcinomas, using 11 polymorphic microsatellite markers located on chromosome 16. Allelic imbalance of one or more markers on 16q was shown by 30 of the 46 tumors (65%). Among these 30 carcinomas, LOH on the long arm of chromosome 16 was detected at all informative loci in 19 (41%); 13 of them showed allelic imbalance on the long but not on the short arm, with the occurrence of variable “breakpoints” in the pericentromeric region. The partial allelic imbalance in 11 tumors involved either the 16q22.1-qter LOH region or interstitial LOH regions. A commonly deleted region was found between D16S421 and D16S289 on 16q22.1 in 29 of the 30 tumors. The present data argue in favor of an important involvement of a tumor suppressor gene mapping to 16q22.1 in the genesis or progression of breast cancer.     

Cytogenetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution in synchronous bilateral breast carcinomas and their lymph node metastases from a male patient without any detectable BRCA2 germline mutation

Two synchronous bilateral breast carcinomas and their matched lymph node metastases from a 70-year-old man were cytogenetically analyzed. All four tumors were near-diploid, and except for the primary tumor from the right breast, had a 45,X,-Y clone in common. The loss of the Y chromosome was, however, common to all four tumors, whereas metaphase cells from peripheral blood lymphocytes showed a normal 46, XY chromosome complement. The primary tumor from the right breast was monoclonal, with loss of the Y chromosome and gain of 1q, whereas its metastasis had two related clones: the 45,X,-Y clone, and the other a more complex version of the clone in the primary tumor, with inv(3), -14, and del(16)(q13) as additional changes. The primary tumor from the left breast was polyclonal with three unrelated clones: 45,X,-Y/45,XY,-18/47,XY,+20, two of which were present in its metastasis. DNA flow cytometric studies showed diploidy for both primary tumors. No mutation in the BRCA2 gene was found on analysis of DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes. The present findings show that del(16)(q13) is a recurrent finding among male breast carcinomas and that some of the primary cytogenetic abnormalities, as well as the pattern of chromosomal changes during the progression of sporadic breast carcinoma in the male, are similar to those in the female. In addition, the loss of the Y chromosome in the tumors but not in peripheral blood lymphocytes, suggests a possible role for this abnormality in the pathogenesis of male breast carcinoma.     

Detection of numerical alterations of chromosome 1 in cytopathological specimens of breast tumors by chromogen in situ hybridization

To investigate the effectiveness of chromogen in situ hybridization (CISH) in the diagnosis of breast tumors, numerical alterations of chromosome 1 were examined by CISH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, and the presence of der(16)t(1;16) was also examined by FISH in imprinted cytology specimens from resected tissues of 14 carcinomas and five non-malignant lesions. The modal signal counts of chromosome 1 were compared between the specimens processed by CISH and FISH for each case. Aneusomies of the long arm of chromosome 1 were detected in 10 (71%) carcinomas as the major clones by both methods. In addition, one atypical papilloma demonstrated tetrasomy of 1q12 as a major clone by CISH, but such a clone was at first overlooked by FISH. Four other benign lesions showed disomic 1q12 signals as a major clone by both CISH and FISH. As additional information from FISH, eight cancers showed structural or numerical alterations of chromosome 16, and four showed der(16)t(1;16). In total, 10 carcinomas showed chromosome 16 alterations, and all of these overlapped with the carcinomas with 1q12 aneusomies. The CISH method provided almost the same results as the FISH method, and both methods were considered applicable in supportive diagnosis of cytological specimens of breast tumors. In addition, the CISH method was superior in the detection of numerical alterations in carcinoma cells by referring to the morphology of cells and in the detection of significant clones which might be missed under dark-field microscopy.     

Quantitative multigene FISH on breast carcinomas identifies der(1;16)(q10;p10) as an early event in luminal A tumors

In situ detection of genomic alterations in cancer provides information at the single cell level, making it possible to investigate genomic changes in cells in a tissue context. Such topological information is important when studying intratumor heterogeneity as well as alterations related to different steps in tumor progression. We developed a quantitative multigene fluorescence in situ hybridization (QM FISH) method to detect multiple genomic regions in single cells in complex tissues. As a “proof of principle” we applied the method to breast cancer samples to identify partners in whole arm (WA) translocations. WA gain of chromosome arm 1q and loss of chromosome arm 16q are among the most frequent genomic events in breast cancer. By designing five specific FISH probes based on breakpoint information from comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH) profiles, we visualized chromosomal translocations in clinical samples at the single cell level. By analyzing aCGH data from 295 patients with breast carcinoma with known molecular subtype, we found concurrent WA gain of 1q and loss of 16q to be more frequent in luminal A tumors compared to other molecular subtypes. QM FISH applied to a subset of samples (n = 26) identified a derivative chromosome der(1;16)(q10;p10), a result of a centromere‐close translocation between chromosome arms 1q and 16p. In addition, we observed that the distribution of cells with the translocation varied from sample to sample, some had a homogenous cell population while others displayed intratumor heterogeneity with cell‐to‐cell variation. Finally, for one tumor with both preinvasive and invasive components, the fraction of cells with translocation was lower and more heterogeneous in the preinvasive tumor cells compared to the cells in the invasive component. © 2014 The Authors Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Demonstration of the translocation der(16)t(1;16)(q12;q11.2) in interphase nuclei of ewing tumors

The der(16)t(1;16) has been detected cytogenetically in a number of malignancies including Ewing tumors (ETs). To enable fast and reliable analysis of der(16) chromosomes, we established an interphase cytogenetic approach. By using two DNA probes hybridizing to the heterochromatic portions on the long arms of chromosomes 1 and 16, this technique allows the detection of this chromosomal aberration in nonproliferating cells. Formation of the der(16) leads to partial excess of 1 q material and partial loss of the long arm of chromosome 16. Double-target fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments were performed on cytospin slides of 13 ETs, near-triploid tumor cells and normal cells to assess whether the FISH technique used permits the discrimination of nuclei harboring this aberration from nuclei without a der(16) chromosome. In five ETs, we found evidence for the presence of one or two der(16)t(1;16) chromosomes both by FISH and by conventional cytogenetics. Tumor cells displayed two signals for intact chromosomes 1, one or two additional fused signals for the der(16) chromosomes, and one signal for the intact chromosome 16. In one case without fused signals, the presence of a der(16) was demonstrated by hybridizing a painting probe for chromosome 16 simultaneously with the paracentromeric probe for chromosome 1. Our results suggest that double-target FISH on interphase nuclei offers an ideal tool for analyzing tumors prospectively and retrospectively to assess the biological role and the possible prognostic impact of the der(16) in ETs and in other solid tumors. Genes Chromosom Cancer 17:141–150 (1996) © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss is associated with steroid receptor presence and low proliferation in breast carcinoma.

We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to 46 breast carcinoma samples, collected from 1993 to 1995, in order to detect chromosome 1q gains and 16q losses and to define whether samples showing both these alterations had distinct biopathologic features and different clinical outcome. A total of 22 samples (48%) had simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss, which was always associated with other genetic changes. In total, 23 samples had various chromosome imbalances (including chromosome 1q gain independent of chromosome 16q loss and vice versa) and one sample did not show detectable alterations. Samples having chromosome 1q gain/16q loss were compared to the other samples with regard to neoplasm size, lymph-node status, histologic and nuclear grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor presence, Ki-67, pRB, Cyclin D1, Cyclin A, p53, p21 and p27 expression as detected by immunohistochemistry. The samples showing chromosome 1q gain/16q loss had high steroid hormone receptor expression (P=0.02), low cell growth fraction (Ki-67, P=0.03) and high p27 expression (P<0.001). No statistical correlation with disease-free survival and overall survival or response to hormonal therapy was found. We conclude that simultaneous chromosome 1q gain/16q loss is a frequent event in invasive breast cancer, which occurs in a subset of both intermediate- and high-grade breast carcinomas. Although the final chromosome 1q and 16q imbalances might have originated from different chromosome alterations in low- and high-grade samples, the gene-dosage effect might be important in conferring peculiar biopathologic characteristics to this subset of samples. The cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms underlying these chromosome changes deserve further investigations.     

At least two different regions are involved in allelic imbalance on chromosome arm 16q in breast cancer

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or allelic imbalance, the latter term referring to both loss and gain of an allele, on the long arm of chromosome 16 has been repeatedly found in cancers of, e.g., the breast and prostate. This indicates the presence of one or more tumor suppressor genes on 16q. To locate the gene(s) more precisely, a detailed allelic imbalance map of 20 polymorphic markers on this chromosome arm was made for 79 sporadic breast carcinomas. LOH of one or more markers was found in 63% of the tumors. Some had allelic imbalance on a region of 16q which failed to overlap with the LOH in other tumors. We therefore assigned two separate “smallest regions of overlap” to 16q and suggest that this chromosome arm contains at least two different tumor suppressor genes. Genes Chrom Cancer 9:101-107 (1994).© 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Trisomy 1q generating translocations in Wilms tumor

Unbalanced translocations generating trisomy of 1q are common in Wilms tumor (WT). We present eight unbalanced 1q translocations from seven tumors and a review of the literature. An unbalanced translocation that results in a der(16)t(1q;16q) chromosome represents more than half of the published +1q generating translocations in WT. This translocation is also common to many other tumor types. Four of the tumors presented here contained this chromosome and,in two cases, it was the primary acquired cytogenetic abnormality within the tumor. The other four translocations involved 9q31, 9q34, 17p1?, and 21p11 as the partner to 1q. The chromosome 17 and 21 translocations occurred within the same tumor as apparently independent events. In contrast with the 16q translocations, these other translocations were secondary cytogenetic events, thereby indicating a role in tumor progression rather than initiation. Probes mapping to 1q12 and 1q21 were employed for fluorescence in situ hybridization and it was demonstrated that different 1q breakpoints are possible. In this series, the majority of breakpoints either mapped to 1q12 or were centromeric to this region.     

Two-color FISH characterization of i(1q) and der(1;16) in human breast cancer cells

Two-color fluorescent in situ hybridizations using probes for alphoid (α) and classical satellite (CS) DNAs from chromosomes 1 and 16 were performed to characterize i(1q), der(1;16), and complex rearrangements observed in breast cancer cells from fresh tumors and established cell lines. Six of seven i(1q) occurred after breakage in the α1 containing region and one of seven was dicentric, with breakage in 1p11.2. The five der(1;16)(q10;p10) studied appeared to result from a variety of breakpoints involving α1, α16, CS1, and CS16 DNAs. All had conserved α16 DNA, suggesting a segregation of the der(1;16) leading to a loss of 16q and a gain of 1q in most cases. One complex rearrangement of chromosome 1 also appeared to involve chromosome 16, suggesting that a der(1;16) occurred first, followed by another rearrangement. Both the apparent preferential involvement of constitutive heterochromatin harboring α and CS DNAs and the variety of breakpoints spanning along heterochromatin suggest that the important consequence of the rearrangement is not the breakage per se but the resulting imbalance. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Chromosome analysis of 97 primary breast carcinomas: Identification of eight karyotypic subgroups

Chromosome banding analysis of 97 short-term cultured primary breast carcinomas revealed clonal aberrations in 79 tumors, whereas 18 were karyotypically normal. In 34 of the 79 tumors with abnormalities, two to eight clones per case were detected; unrelated clones were present in 27 (34%) cases, whereas only related clones were found in seven. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of breast carcinomas are of polyclonal origin. Altogether eight abnormalities were repeatedly identified both as sole chromosomal anomalies and as part of more complex karyotypes: the structural rearrangements i(1)(q10), der(1;16)(q10;p10), del(1)(q11–12), del(3)(p12–13p14–21), and del(6)(q21–22) and the numerical aberrations +7, +18, and +20. At least one of these changes was found in 41 (52%) of the karyotypically abnormal tumors. They identify a minimum number of cytogenetic subgroups in breast cancer and are likely to represent primary chromosome anomalies in this type of neoplasia. Other candidates for such a role are translocations of 3p12–13 and 4q21 with various partner chromosomes and inversions of chromosome 7, which also were seen repeatedly. Additional chromosomal aberrations that give the impression of occurring nonrandomly in breast carcinomas include structural rearrangements leading to partial monosomies for 1p, 8p, 11p, 11q, 15p, 17p, 19p, and 19q and losses of one copy of chromosomes X, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, and 22. The latter changes were seen consistently only in complex karyotypes, however, and we therefore interpret them as being secondary anomalies acquired during clonal evolution.     

Identification of novel deletion regions on chromosome arms 2q and 6p in breast carcinomas by amplotype analysis

DNA fingerprinting by arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) was employed to identify molecular genetic alterations in 37 primary breast carcinomas. AP-PCR is a PCR-based technique that uses only one primer of arbitrary sequence that generates a molecular karyotype (amplotype) of tumors. The breast cancer amplotype generated with two arbitrary primers (MCG1 and Blue) showed a relatively high frequency (more than 20% of the tumors) of gains at chromosomes 1, 4, and 8, and of losses at chromosomes 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, and the X chromosome. We further analyzed the regions most commonly gained at chromosome 8 (47%) and lost at chromosomes 2 (38%) and 6 (49%) by determining the subchromosomal localization of the fingerprint bands from these chromosomes. The region of gain at chromosome 8 was mapped at 8q24.1, close to MYC. Band MCG1-A1 was assigned to chromosome band 2q22, and band Blue-J was assigned to 6p21. Common losses of these chromosomal regions have not been described for breast cancer. To map these deletion regions more precisely, we performed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis by microallelotyping on 20 of the 37 cancers previously analyzed by AP-PCR and another additional 52 breast carcinomas. The results suggest that the regions at 2q21-24 and 6p21-23 may harbor novel tumor suppressor genes for breast cancer. LOH at 2q21-24 (D2S2304) was more frequent in high-grade tumors (59%) than in low-grade tumors (29%) (P = 0.03). This suggests that this genetic alteration may be associated with tumor progression and shows the power of the amplotype approach in detecting novel genetic alterations that are useful as clinical parameters of breast cancer.     

Chromosome banding analysis of gynecomastias and breast carcinomas in men

Male breast cancer is 100 times less frequent than its female counterpart and accounts for less than 1% of all cancers in men. Although men with breast cancer also often have gynecomastia, it is still unknown whether gynecomastia per se predisposes the male breast to malignant disease. We describe the cytogenetic analysis of three gynecomastias and four breast cancers in men. No chromosome abnormalities were detected in two cases of gynecomastia, with no other concomitant breast disease. The third gynecomastia sample, taken from a site where a breast carcinoma had previously been removed, had a t(2;11)(p24;p13) as the sole chromosome change; this is the first time that an abnormal karyotype has been described in gynecomastia. All four cancers had clonal chromosome abnormalities. Several cytogenetically unrelated clones were found in the breast tumor and in a metastasis from case 1. In the carcinoma of case 2, a single abnormal clone was found, characterized by loss of the Y chromosome, monosomy 17, and a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18. In the carcinoma of case 3, a clone with loss of the Y chromosome as the sole change dominated, accompanied by the gain of an X chromosome in a subclone. In the lymph node metastasis examined from case 4, a single clone carrying trisomies for chromosomes 5 and 16 was detected. Our findings, especially when collated with data on the six karyotypically abnormal breast carcinomas in men described previously, indicate that gain of the X chromosome, gain of chromosome 5, loss of the Y chromosome, loss of chromosome 17, and del(18)(q21) are nonrandom abnormalities in male breast carcinomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 23:16–20, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Pattern of chromosome 16q loss differs between an atypical proliferative lesion and an intraductal or invasive ductal carcinoma occurring subsequently in the same area of the breast.

Atypical proliferative lesions of the breast, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical papilloma, are considered to be precursors of breast carcinomas and have frequently been shown to have loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 16q at the DNA level. We evaluated whether an atypical proliferative lesion and a carcinoma that subsequently occurred in the same area of the ipsilateral breast were of identical clonal origin in seven patients. Using DNA isolated from microdissected archival tissue of epithelial components of both the biopsy specimen of the atypical proliferative lesion and the mastectomy specimen of the carcinoma, the pattern of LOH on 16q was compared between these two lesions using polymerase chain reaction -microsatellite LOH analysis. As a control, LOH on 16q was examined in 13 cases of usual ductal hyperplasia, 10 usual papillomas, and 6 atypical ductal hyperplasias. In the seven cases, LOH on 16q was detected in three of the six atypical proliferative lesions and in five of the seven carcinomas, but the allele with LOH or a deleted region always differed between the two. LOH was detected in both atypical proliferative lesions and carcinomas in one case, only in the atypical proliferative lesion in two cases, and only in carcinomas in three cases. In the controls, LOH on 16q was absent in usual ductal hyperplasias or usual papillomas but was detected in two of six atypical ductal hyperplasias. Although atypical proliferative lesions were frequently confirmed to be of clonal nature with LOH on 16q, these lesions and carcinomas were considered to be clones, probably originated from a field with these clones.     

Frequent rearrangement of chromosomal bands 1p22 and 11q13 in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

We report the finding of clonal structural chromosome abnormalities in short-term cultures from 15 squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region. When the distribution of chromosomal breakpoints in these 15 tumors and in the 16 head and neck carcinomas previously described are assessed, a marked clustering is seen at bands 1p22 and 11q13, which are rearranged in eight and nine tumors, respectively. No other band was involved in aberrations in more than five tumors. Cytogenetic evidence of gene amplification was seen in four tumors, three times in the form of homogeneously staining regions (twice located in 11q13), and in one tumor as double minutes. Among the candidate genes for such amplification are BCLI, INT2, and HSTI, all of which map to 11q13, and NRAS, which maps to 1p22. All these oncogenes have previously been shown to be amplified in subsets of head and neck carcinomas. We conclude that bands 1p22 and 11q13 are nonrandomly involved in chromosomal rearrangements in head and neck carcinomas and suggest that activation of oncogenes located in these bands may proceed via cytogenetic mechanisms.     

Clonality and genetic divergence in multifocal low-grade superficial urothelial carcinoma as determined by chromosome 9 and p53 deletion analysis

Multifocality and recurrence are clinically important features of urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Recent molecular genetic studies have suggested that multifocal urothelial carcinomas are monoclonally derived from an identical transformed progenitor cell. However, most of these studies investigated advanced and poorly differentiated tumors. The study presented focuses on early papillary tumors, including 52 superficial well-differentiated multifocal and recurrent bladder carcinomas from 10 patients. Microdissection separating urothelium from stromal cells was considered essential to obtain pure tumor cell populations. Genetic analysis was carried out by applying two different methods. Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromeric probes for chromosomes 9 and 17 and gene-specific probes for chromosome loci 9q22, 9p21, and 17p13 was carried out in parallel to loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses applying 5 microsatellite markers on these chromosomes. Overall, deletions on chromosome 9p were found in 47 tumors (90%), at chromosome 9q in 36 tumors (69%) and at chromosome 17p in 3 tumors (6%). There was a very high correlation of the results between FISH and LOH analysis. Ten early superficial papillary tumors showed deletion of chromosome 9p without deletion of 9q, suggesting 9p deletions as a very early event in the development of papillary urothelial carcinoma. Although in four patients, all investigated tumors showed identical genetic alterations and one patient showed no genetic alterations at the loci investigated, in five patients, two or more clones with different deletions were found. In four of these patients, the results are compatible with clonal divergence and selection of different cell subpopulations derived from a common progenitor cell. However, in one patient different alleles in two markers at chromosome 9 were deleted, favoring an independent evolution of two recurring tumor cell clones. In summary, we could show that there is considerable genetic heterogeneity in early multifocal and recurring urothelial carcinoma and demonstrated the occurrence of two independent clones in at least one patient as an indicator of possible initial oligoclonality of bladder cancer.     

Lower frequency of allele loss on chromosome 18q in human breast cancer than in colorectal tumors

Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes is thought to be a critical step in tumorigenesis. TheDCC (deleted in colorectal carcinoma) gene, located on the long arm of chromosome 18, has been shown to be frequently deleted in colorectal tumors. To investigate the involvement of allelic deletions on chromosome 18q in breast cancer tumorigenesis we analyzed 28 primary breast tumors and 28 colorectal, tumors (24 carcinomas, 4 adenomas) with four different polymorphic DNA markers detecting RFLPs on chromosome 18q. In breast cancer we found loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in 4 of 27 (15%) informative cases whereas 15 of 25 (60%) colorectal tumors showed allelic deletions. In all cases of allelic loss theDCC locus or its proximal vicinity (locus SSAV1) were involved. LOH on chromosome 18q occurs both in breast and colorectal cancer, yet the frequency of these deletions in breast tumors is lower than in colorectal tumors. Moreover, in breast cancer these mutations were only detected in large and undifferentiated tumors.Abbreviations LOH Loss of heterozygosity     

The first recurring chromosome translocation in hepatoblastoma: Der(4)t(1;4)(q12;q34)

We report four cases of hepatoblastoma with a derivative chromosome 4 from an unbalanced translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 1 and 4, an aberration reported only rarely in isolated cases of other types of neoplasms. The abnormality in three hepatoblastomas was der(4)t(1;4)(q12;q34), whereas the fourth case appeared to have a der(4)t (q25;q32). All had hyperdiploid tumor karyotypes; however, in the case with t(q25;q32), the der(4) was the only abnormality in the stemline. We speculate that the oncogenetic event in our cases may be the loss of a gene or genes on distal 4q or their alteration by juxtaposition to 1q12 heterochromatin. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 19:291–294, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.