Influence of prior sprint exercise on the parameters of the 'all-out critical power test' in men

We tested the hypothesis that a prior 30 s sprint exercise bout would significantly reduce the curvature constant ( W ') but not the power-asymptote (critical power, CP) of the power–duration relationship as assessed using a novel 3 min all-out cycling test. Seven physically active male subjects completed the 3 min all-out test on three occasions in random order: following no prior sprint exercise (control, C); following a 30 s sprint and a 2 min recovery (S2); and following a 30 s sprint and a 15 min recovery period (S15). The CP was estimated from the mean power output sustained over the final 30 s of the test and the W ' was estimated as the power–time integral above the end-test power. There were no significant differences in the estimated CP between the control 3 min all-out trial and the two prior sprint conditions (C, 235 ± 44 W; S2, 223 ± 46 W; and S15, 232 ± 50 W; P > 0.05; coefficients of variation 2, 3 and 6% for C–S2, C–S15 and S2–S15, respectively). However, the W ' in S2 (16.5 ± 3.3 kJ) was significantly lower than in C (20.8 ± 3.9 kJ) and S15 (21.2 ± 4.5 kJ; P < 0.05). The total work done was lower in S2 than in the other conditions (S2, 56.4 ± 7.2 kJ; C, 63.5 ± 6.6 kJ; and S15, 63.0 ± 6.0 kJ; P < 0.05). The W ', but not the CP, is sensitive to a bout of prior sprint exercise which would be expected to result in significant muscle phosphocreatine depletion. These findings support the fundamental principles of the power–duration relationship as applied to all-out exercise.     

Influence of initial metabolic rate on the power–duration relationship for all-out exercise

A single 3-min all-out cycling test can be used to estimate the power asymptote (critical power, CP) and the curvature constant (W') of the power-duration relationship for severe-intensity exercise. It was hypothesized that when exercise immediately preceding the 3-min all-out test was performed CP would systematically reduce the W' without affecting the CP. Seven physically active males completed 3-min all-out cycling tests in randomized order immediately preceded by: unloaded cycling (control); 6-min moderate; 6-min heavy; 2-min severe (S2); or 4-min severe (S4) intensity exercise. The CP was estimated from the mean power output over the final 30 s of the test and the W' was estimated as the power-time integral above end-test power. There were no significant differences in the CP between control (279 ± 62), moderate (275 ± 52), heavy (286 ± 66 W), S2 (274 ± 55), or S4 (273 ± 65 W). The W' was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in S2 (11.5 ± 2.5) and S4 (8.9 ± 2.2) than in control (16.3 ± 2.3), moderate (17.2 ± 2.4) and heavy (15.6 ± 2.3 kJ). These results support the notion that the W' is predictably depleted only at a power output >CP whereas the CP is independent of the mechanisms which reduce W'.     

Effect of end-point cadence on the maximal work-time relationship

This study examined the effect of end-point cadence on the parameters of the work-time relationship determined for cycle ergometry. Eight male subjects completed four maximal tests on an electrically-braked cycle ergometer that regulated a constant power output independent of cadence. The power outputs imposed ranged between an average of 259 W and 403 W, whereas the corresponding durations ranged between 139 s and 1691 s. During each test subjects were required to maintain a cadence of 80–90 rpm. Accumulated time to end-point cadences of 70, 60 and 50 rpm were recorded. The four work-time determinations for each of three end-point cadences were used to determine linear relationships between work and time, yielding both a y-intercept, which represents anaerobic work capacity, and a slope, which is termed critical power (CP), for each end-point cadence. There was a significant increase in the y-intercept as end-point cadence decreased from 70 to 60 rpm (F[1,7]=36.7, p < 0.001) or 70 to 50 rpm (F[1,7]=80.1, p < 0.001), but not from 60 rpm to 50 rpm (F[1,7]=3.28, p > 0.05). In contrast, there was no effect of end-point cadence on CP (F[2,14]=1.89, p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that the end-point cadence selected to terminate tests only affects the y-intercept of the work-time relationship. To control for this effect, the cadence at which each test is terminated should be standardised if determination of anaerobic work capacity, as represented by the y-intercept, is required.     

The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of power output and pedaling cadence on the amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal during submaximal cycle ergometry. Nine adults (mean age +/- SD = 22.7 +/- 2.1 yrs) performed an incremental (25 W increase every min) test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer to determine VO2Peak and Wpeak. The subjects also performed three, 8 min continuous, constant power output rides (randomly ordered) at 35%, 50%, and 65% Wpeak. The continuous 8 min workbouts were divided into 4 min epochs. The subjects pedaled at either 50 or 70 rev x min(-1) (randomized) during the first 4 min epoch, then changed to the alternate cadence during the second 4 min epoch. The MMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis during the final 10 s of each minute. Two separate two-way [cadence (50 and 70 rev x min(-1)) x %Wpeak (35, 50, and 65)] repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that MMG amplitude followed power output, but not pedaling cadence, whereas MMG MPF was not consistently affected by power output or pedaling cadence. Furthermore, these findings suggested that power output was modulated by motor unit recruitment and not rate coding.     

Energetics of middle-distance running performances in male and female junior using track measurements

The aim of this study was to determine the energetic factors of middle-distance running performance in junior elite runners according to gender and by using measurements from on-track performances. Fifteen elite runners (8 males and 7 females) were investigated by means of an incremental test and an all-out run over 600 m performed with a 2-d interval. We calculated (1) the aerobic maximal power (E(r max aero), in W kg(-1)), including VO(2 max) and the delay of attainment of VO(2 max) in the 600 m run; (2) the anaerobic power (E(r max anaero)), i.e., the oxygen deficit (J kg(-1)) divided by the duration of the 600 m run. Despite the difference in race duration (87 +/- 3 vs. 102 +/- 2 s), the 600 m run was made at the same relative value of the velocity associated with VO(2 max) (VVO(2 )max) in males and females (121.6 +/- 7 vs. 120 +/- 8% VO(2 max), p = 0.7). E(r max aero) explained most of the variance in the performance (the personal best performed 8 weeks later) between genders: 65 and 79% over 800 m (T(800)) and 1,500 m (T(1,500)). For females, E(r max aero) explained most of the variance of T(1,500) (r(2) = 0.66), and E(r max anaero) improved this prediction (r(2) = 0.84). No energetic factor predicted the performance on 800 m run in males. In elite junior athletes, the energetic model with individual data measured over an all-out 600 m performed on a track, provides an explanation for most of the variance in middle-distance running performances between genders. The distinction between aerobic power and anaerobic power allowed an improvement in the prediction of middle-distance running performances.     

Achievement of peak VO2 during a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint in adolescents.

The aim of this study was to determine whether peak oxygen uptake (PVO2) attained in a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint is comparable to that from a conventional ramp test. Sixteen participants (13 boys and 3 girls, 14.6 +/- 0.4 yr) volunteered for the study. On Day 1 they completed a PVO2 test to exhaustion using a 25 W x min(-1) ramp protocol beginning at 50 W. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest VO2 value achieved, and aerobic power (Wmax) as the power output of the final 30 s. On Day 2 the participants completed two 90-s maximal sprints (S1 and S2). A 45-min recovery period separated each sprint. Mean oxygen uptake over the last 10 s of each sprint was determined as PVO2, and minimum power (MinP-30 s) as the mechanical power attained in the final 30 s. A one-way ANOVA was used to analyse differences between S1, S2, and the ramp test for PVO2 and MinP-30 s. Peak VO2 was not significantly different between the ramp, S1, or S2 (2.64 +/- 0.5, 2.49 +/- 0.5, and 2.53 +/- 0.5 L x min(-1), respectively, p > 0.68). The S1 and S2 PVO2 scores represented 91 +/- 10% and 92 +/- 10% of the ramp aerobic test. The MinP-30 s for S1 and S2 were significantly lower than the Wmax of the ramp test, p < 0.05. Hence, for researchers solely interested in PVO2 values, a shorter but more intensive protocol provides an alternative method to the traditional ramp aerobic test.     

Curvilinear VO(2):power output relationship in a ramp test in professional cyclists: possible association with blood hemoglobin concentration

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) if there exists an additional, nonlinear increase (DeltaVO(2)) in the oxygen uptake observed (VO2 (obs)) at the maximal power output reached during a ramp cycle ergometer test and that expected (VO2 (exp)) from the linear relationship between VO(2) and power output below the lactate threshold (LT) in professional riders, and (2) the relationship between DeltaVO(2) and possible explanatory mechanisms. Each of 12 professional cyclists (25 +/- 1 years; VO(2 max): 71.3 +/- 1.2 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) performed a ramp test until exhaustion (power output increases of 25 W x min(-1)) during which several gas-exchange and blood variables were measured (including lactate, HCO(3)(-) and K(+)). VO(2) was linearly related to power output until the LT in all subjects. Afterward, a nonlinear deflection was observed in the VO(2):power output relationship (DeltaVO(2) = 2492 +/- 55 ml x min(-1) and p < 0.05 for VO2 (obs) vs. VO2 (exp)). A significant negative correlation was encountered between DeltaVO(2) and resting hemoglobin levels before the tests (r = 20.61; p < 0.05). In conclusion, professional cyclists exhibit an attenuation of the VO(2) rise above the LT.     

Determinants of repeated-sprint ability in females matched for single-sprint performance

This study investigated the relationship between VO2max and repeated-sprint ability (RSA), while controlling for the effects of initial sprint performance on sprint decrement. This was achieved via two methods: (1) matching females of low and moderate aerobic fitness (VO2max: 36.4 +/- 4.7 vs 49.6 +/- 5.5 ml kg(-1) min(-1) ; p < 0.05) for initial sprint performance and then comparing RSA, and (2) semi-partial correlations to adjust for the influence of initial sprint performance on RSA. Tests consisted of a RSA cycle test (5 x 6-s max sprints every 30 s) and a VO2max test. Muscle biopsies were taken before and after the RSA test. There was no significant difference between groups for work (W1, 3.44 +/- 0.57 vs 3.58 +/- 0.49 kJ; p = 0.59) or power (P1, 788.1 +/- 99.2 vs 835.2 +/- 127.2 W; p = 0.66) on the first sprint, or for total work (W(tot), 15.2 +/- 2.2 vs 16.6 +/- 2.2 kJ; p = 0.25). However, the moderate VO2max group recorded a smaller work decrement across the five sprints (W(dec), 11.1 +/- 2.5 vs 7.6 +/- 3.4%; p = 0.045). There were no significant differences between the two groups for muscle buffer capacity, muscle lactate or pH at any time point. When a semi-partial correlation was performed, to control for the contribution of W1 to W(dec), the correlation between VO2max and W(dec) increased from r = -0.41 (p > 0.05) to r = -0.50 (p < 0.05). These results indicate that VO2max does contribute to performance during repeated-sprint efforts. However, the small variance in W(dec) explained by VO2max suggests that other factors also play a role.     

Fatigue and optimal conditions for short-term work capacity

There is an optimal load and corresponding velocity at which peak power output occurs. It is reasonable to expect that these conditions will change as a result of fatigue during 30 s of all-out cycling. This study evaluated optimal velocity after 30 s of maximal isokinetic cycle ergometer exercise and tested the hypothesis that progressive adjustment of velocity (optimized) during 30 s of all-out cycling would permit greater short-term work capacity (STWC). Non-fatigued optimal cadence [NF_OC, 109.6 (2.5) rpm] was determined for ten males on an SRM ergometer using regression analysis of the torque–angular velocity relation during a 7-s maximal acceleration. Fatigued optimal cadence [73.4 (2.4) rpm] was determined in the same way, immediately after a 30-s isokinetic test at NF_OC. A subsequent trial with cadence decreasing in steps from NF_OC to a conservative estimate of fatigued optimal cadence [83.9 (2.8) rpm] was completed to see if more work could be done with a more optimal cadence during the test. STWC was not different (P=0.50) between the constant [23,681 (764) J] and optimized [23,679 (708) J] conditions. Another more radical progressive change in cadence with four subjects yielded the same result (no increase in STWC). Extraneous factors apparently contribute more to variability in STWC than differences between constant and adjusted optimization of conditions.     

健身车转速与阻力对踩踏力量与下肢肌电的影响

目的比较骑车运动中以不同踩踏频率进行不同负荷强度运动时对于踩踏力量与下肢作用肌激发模式的影响。方法 12名健康成年男性在实验第1阶段以渐增负荷法测得各受试者的踏车运动最大稳定输出功率(poweroutput at VO2max,POV),实验第2阶段以平衡次序法进行3种不同运动强度(50%,65%,80%POV)与3种踩踏频率(60,75,90 r/min)的踏车运动测验,并分别记录9种实验情境中踩踏力量与下肢肌电图的变化。结果不同运动测验中,踩踏力量的负功随着踩踏频率的增加而上升,当曲柄角度在270°的位置时,踩踏合力随回转速的上升平均会增加1.84倍,且踩踏切线作用力峰值明显提前;整体而言,下肢肌群激活率会随踩踏频率的增加而上升。结论在未受自行车训练者中,踩踏频率为影响踩踏力量以及肌电结果的主要因素,踩踏作用力的作用趋势会随着踩踏频率的增加而前移,亦会随着踩踏频率的增加使力量输出曲线平滑化,且3种运动强度的结果相近。以整体踩踏效益而言,未受训练者较佳的踩踏回转速为60 r/min。     

The VO2 response to submaximal ramp cycle exercise: Influence of ramp slope and training status

The aim of the study was to test whether ramp slope and training status interact in the oxygen uptake (VO2) response during submaximal ramp exercise. Eight cyclists (VO2 peak=67.8+/-3.7 ml min(-1)kg(-1)) and eight physically active students (PA students) (VO2 peak=49.1+/-4.3 ml min(-1)kg(-1)) performed several ramp protocols, respectively, 25 and 40 W min(-1) for the cyclists and 10, 25 and 40 W min(-1) for the PA students. Vo(2) was plotted as a function of time and work rate up to the gas exchange threshold (GET). Faster ramp elicited a significantly shorter mean response time (MRT) in both groups, and MRT was significantly longer for each ramp protocol in the PA students (126+/-32s, 76+/-15s and 50+/-6s for ramp 10, ramp 25 and ramp 40, respectively) compared to the cyclists (61+/-9s and 40+/-11s for ramp 25 and ramp 40, respectively). Ramp 40 showed less steep Delta VO2/Delta W than ramp 25 in both groups (p<0.01) and Delta VO2/Delta W was less steep for each ramp protocol in PA students (p<0.01) (9.82+/-0.30 ml min(-1)W(-1) and 9.33+/-0.45 ml min(-1)W(-1) for ramp 25 and ramp 40, respectively) compared to cyclists (10.31+/-0.40 ml min(-1)W(-1) and 10.05+/-0.48 ml min(-1)W(-1) for ramp 25 and ramp 40, respectively). In the PA students, Delta VO2/Delta W did not differ between ramp 10 and ramp 25. Statistical analysis showed no interaction effects between ramp slope and training status for MRT (p=0.62) and Delta VO2/Delta W (p=0.35).     

Human critical power-oxygen uptake relationship at different pedalling frequencies

Critical power (CP) is lower at faster rather than slower pedalling frequencies and traditionally reported in watts (W). Faster pedalling frequencies also engender a greater metabolic rate (VO2) at low work rates, but with progressive increases in power output, the initial difference in VO2 between fast and slower pedalling frequencies is reduced. We tested the hypothesis that CP represents a unique metabolic rate for any given individual which would be similar at different pedalling frequencies. Eleven collegiate athletes (five cross-country runners, END; six sprinters, SPR), aged 18-23 years, performed exhaustive rides at either 60 or 100 r.p.m. on separate days for the determination of the pedal rate-specific CP. The VO2 at CP (CP-VO2) was determined from an 8 min ride at the CP for each pedal frequency. The group mean CP was significantly lower at 100 r.p.m. (189 +/- 50 W) compared to 60 r.p.m. (207 +/- 53 W, P < 0.05). However, the group mean CP-VO2 values at 60 (2.53 +/- 0.60 l min(-1)) and 100 r.p.m. (2.58 +/- 0.53 l min(-1)) were not significantly different. Critical power was significantly higher in the END athletes (242 +/- 50 W at 60 r.p.m.; 221 +/- 56 W at 100 r.p.m.) compared to SPR athletes at both pedal frequencies (177 +/- 38 W at 60 r.p.m.; 162 +/- 27 W at 100 r.p.m., P < 0.05), but the CP-VO2 was not (P > 0.05). However, when the CP-VO2 was scaled to body weight, the END athletes had a significantly greater CP-VO2 (41.3 +/- 4.1 ml min(-1) kg(-1) at 60 r.p.m.; 40.8 +/- 5.5 ml min(-1) kg(-1) at 100 r.p.m.) compared to the SPR athletes at both pedal frequencies (27.7 +/- 4.6 ml min(-1) kg(-1) at 60 r.p.m.; 29.4 +/- 2.8 ml min(-1) kg(-1) at 100 r.p.m., P < 0.05). We conclude that CP represents a specific metabolic rate (VO2) which can be achieved at different combinations of power outputs and pedalling frequencies.     

The most economical cadence increases with increasing workload

Several studies have suggested that the most economical cadence in cycling increases with increasing workload. However, none of these studies have been able to demonstrate this relationship with experimental data. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the most economical cadence in elite cyclists increases with increasing workload and to explore the effect of cadence on performance. Six elite road cyclists performed submaximal and maximal tests at four different cadences (60, 80, 100 and 120 rpm) on separate days. Respiratory data was measured at 0, 50, 125, 200, 275 and 350 W during the submaximal test and at the end of the maximal test. The maximal test was carried out as an incremental test, conducted to reveal differences in maximal oxygen uptake and time to exhaustion (short-term performance) between cadences. The results showed that the lowest oxygen uptake, i.e. the best work economy, shifted from 60 rpm at 0 W to 80 rpm at 350 W (P<0.05). No difference was found in maximal oxygen uptake among cadences (P>0.05), while the best performance was attained at the same cadence that elicited the best work economy (80 rpm) at 350 W (P<0.05). This study demonstrated that the most economical cadence increases with increasing workload in elite cyclists. It was further shown that work economy and performance are related during short efforts (~5 min) over a wide range of cadences.     

The isocapnic buffering phase and mechanical efficiency: relationship to cycle time trial performance of short and long duration.

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the isocapnic buffer (beta(isocapnic)) and hypocapnic hyperventilation (HHV) phases as well as performance in a short (20-min) and long (90-min) time trial (TT) in trained athletes. In addition, gross (GE, %) and delta (deltaE, %) efficiency were calculated and the relationship between these variables and the average power output (W) in each TT was determined. Thirteen male endurance athletes (Mean +/- SD age 31 +/- 6 yrs; body mass 75.6 +/- 6.3 kg; height 185 +/- 6 cm) completed a continuous incremental test to exhaustion for determination of the beta(isocapnic) and HHV phases. A second submaximal test was used to determine GE and deltaE. The average power output (W) was measured in a 20-min and 90-min cycling TT. The beta(isocapnic) phase (W) was significantly correlated to the average power output (W) in the 20-min TT (r = 0.58; p < 0.05), but not in the 90-min TT (r = 0.28). The HHV phase (W) was not significantly correlated to the average power output in the 20-min or 90-min TT. No significant correlation was found for GE or for deltaE and performance in the TT. The data from this study shows that beta(isocapnic) together with HHV is not likely to be a useful indicator of cycle TT performance of 20- to 90-min duration. Furthermore, GE and deltaE determined from a submaximal incremental stepwise test are not related to cycling TT performance of different duration.     

Consistency of perceptual and metabolic responses to a laboratory-based simulated 4,000-m cycling time trial

Although pacing-related research is widely reported, no studies have described the consistency of pacing strategies or their associated energetic contributions. This study aimed to investigate the consistency of pacing and energetic outlay by establishing the typical within and between trial variations during simulated 4,000 m time trials. Fifteen well-trained male cyclists performed three, 4,000 m time trials with 3–7 days separating each trial. Power output, cadence, heart rate, respiratory exchange and iEMG of the vastus lateralis were recorded continuously throughout each trial. To examine within-trial variability, the data were assigned to 10% bins. Rating of perceived exertion and affective response were recorded every 400 m and a capillary blood sample was collected and assayed for blood lactate concentration every 800 m. Mean typical error across trials 1–3 for all variables was low (range 2.1–6.3%) and lower between trials 2–3 for all variables with the exception of cadence. There were no between-trial differences in pacing strategy; however, typical error for each 10% bin was lower between trials 2–3 than trials 1–2. Anaerobic contribution to power was greatest during the first and last 10% of each trial (p > 0.05). In conclusion, well-trained cyclists demonstrated a high degree of consistency in terms of the pacing strategy they adopted which coincided with similar levels of energy distribution and perceived exertion. A laboratory simulated 4-km cycling trial is a reliable test that may be used to monitor performance and pacing strategy.     

Effect of pedalling rates on physiological response during endurance cycling

This study was undertaken to examine the effect of different pedalling cadences upon various physiological responses during endurance cycling exercise. Eight well-trained triathletes cycled three times for 30 min each at an intensity corresponding to 80% of their maximal aerobic power output. The first test was performed at a freely chosen cadence (FCC); two others at FCC - 20% and FCC + 20%, which corresponded approximately to the range of cadences habitually used by road racing cyclists. The mean (SD) FCC, FCC - 20% and FCC + 20% were equal to 86 (4), 69 (3) and 103 (5) rpm respectively. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO2), minute ventilation (VE) and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were analysed during three periods: between the 4th and 5th, 14th and 15th, and 29th and 30th min. A significant effect of time (P < 0.01) was found at the three cadences for HR, VO2. The VE and R were significantly (P < 0.05) greater at FCC + 20% compared to FCC - 20% at the 5th and 15th min but not at the 30th min. Nevertheless, no significant effect of cadence was observed in HR and VO2. These results suggest that, during high intensity exercise such as that encountered during a time-trial race, well-trained triathletes can easily adapt to the changes in cadence allowed by the classical gear ratios used in practice.     

Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs

Numerous researchers have studied the physiological responses to seated and standing cycling, but actual field data are sparse. One open issue is the preferred cadence of trained cyclists while hill climbing. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the affect of cycling position on economy and preferred cadence in trained cyclists while they climbed a moderate grade hill at various power outputs. Eight trained cyclists (25.8 ± 7.2 years, 68.8 ± 5.0 ml kg⁻¹ min⁻¹, peak power 407.6 ± 69.0 W) completed a seated and standing hill climb at approximately 50, 65 and 75% of peak power output (PPO) in the order shown, although cycling position was randomized, i.e., half the cyclists stood or remained seat on their first trial at each power output. Cyclists also performed a maximal trial unrestricted by position. Heart rate, power output, and cadence were measured continuously with a power tap; ventilation , BF and cadence were significantly higher with seated climbing at all intensities; there were no other physiological differences between the climbing positions. These data support the premise that trained cyclists are equally economical using high or low cadences, but may face a limit to benefits gained with increasing cadence.     

Evaluation of the Monark Wingate ergometer by direct measurement of resistance and velocity.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the new basket-loaded Wingate ergometer introduced by Monark (Model 834E). Velocity was measured directly from the pedal switch while tension was measured with transducers on each end of the brake lacing. Moment of inertia of the flywheel was determined and accounted for in the calculation of power. Constant load tests (39.24 to 98.1 N), were done at pedaling speeds from 80 to 140 r x min(-1) (flywheel angular velocity = 30-50 rad x s(-1)). The load transmitted to the lacing at the front and back of the flywheel was 95.5 +/- 0.8% (mean +/- SEM) and 6.71 +/- 0.8%, respectively, of the load in the basket. Thus, the resultant tension (front minus back) was on average 88.8 +/- 0.57% of the applied load. The velocity recorded by the Monark Wingate Ergometer computer program (MWECP) was the same (100.4 +/- 1.56%) as that determined from the pedal switch directly. Five male mountain bikers performed a 30-s all-out test. Peak power calculated by MWECP (1181 +/- 55W) was always higher (p < .01) than that calculated from direct measures of tension and velocity (1102 +/- 66W), when not taking into account the moment of inertia. These experiments suggest that the basket-loaded Monark Wingate ergometer does not provide a correct calculation of power because of incomplete load transmission to the flywheel.     

Influence of cycling cadence on neuromuscular activity of the knee extensors in humans

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of pedalling rate and power output in cycling on the neuromuscular activity of the knee extensor muscles. Ten subjects took part in 15 randomised trials, which consisted of three levels of power outputs (60%, 80% and 100% maximal aerobic power) and five cadences (70%, 85%, 100%, 115% and 130% of the freely chosen cadence, FCC). Root mean square (rms) was utilized to quantify electromyographic activity of the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles. The mean (SD) FCC did not change with power output, ranging from 85.0 (11.9) to 88.0 (11.1) rpm. A significant power effect (P<0.01) for the rms of VL, VM and RF muscles was observed. Results showed no significant cadence effect on neuromuscular activity of the VL and VM muscles, while the rms of the RF muscle was significantly greater (P<0.05) at 70% FCC when compared to other cadences. In conclusion, the neuromuscular activity of the knee extensor muscles was not significantly influenced by cadence manipulations. Thus, minimisation of the neuromuscular activity of these muscles would not seem to lead to the choice of a cadence in cycling. Electronic Publication     

The effect of pedalling cadence on maximal accumulated oxygen deficit

Pedalling cadence influences the oxygen demand and the tolerable duration of severe intensity cycle ergometer exercise. Both of these variables are factors in the calculation of maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD), which is a widely accepted measure of anaerobic capacity. We were therefore interested in determining whether pedalling cadence affected the value of MAOD. Eighteen university students performed square wave cycling tests, using cadences of 60, 80, and 100 rev min(-1), at work rates selected to cause exhaustion in ~5 min. The oxygen demands for the tests were estimated by extrapolation from the steady-state oxygen uptake in two 4-min moderate intensity bouts performed using each cadence, and were greater at higher cadences. Times to exhaustion were shorter at higher cadences (368 ± 168 s at 60 rev min(-1) > 299 ± 118 s at 80 rev min(-1) > 220 ± 85 s at 100 rev min(-1)). These factors conflated to produce values for MAOD that were not affected by cadence (52 ± 5 ml kg(-1) = 52 ± 5 ml kg(-1) = 52 ± 5 ml kg(-1)). Similarly, the blood lactate concentrations measured 5 min post-exercise were not affected by the pedalling cadence (10.5 ± 2.1 mM = 10.8 ± 1.0 mM = 10.7 ± 2.0 mM). Although muscle contraction frequency influences many exercise responses, we conclude that the expression of anaerobic capacity is not affected by the choice of pedalling cadence.