Helical computed tomography characteristics of splenic and hepatic trauma in children subjected to nonoperative treatment

The purpose of this study was to present the radiological characteristics of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the follow-up of splenic and hepatic injury in children. Children (n=24) less than 13 years old who had suffered blunt abdominal trauma and were diagnosed with splenic and hepatic injury by CT scan prospectively were enlisted in the study. The CT was performed immediately after the injury was suspected, and 7 and 60 days after the trauma. The clinical course of the patients was observed (red blood transfusion requirement, associated abdominal injuries, and hospital stay). The splenic and hepatic injuries varied from grade II to grade IV of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. The CT showed a reduction in the volume of the injury 60 days after the trauma. In this article the radiological findings will be shown and correlated with the clinical course of the patients. This study shows that CT is advantageous for detecting and grading splenic and hepatic injuries. These injuries can be managed nonoperatively in hospitals where CT is available for the evaluation of pediatric patients. Electronic Publication     

Blunt splenic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury in children is a well-established method to salvage splenic function; however, nonsurgical management of adult blunt splenic trauma remains controversial. To assess the value of preoperative abdominal CT in predicting the outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults, a CT-based injury-severity score consisting of four grades was devised and applied in 39 adult patients with blunt splenic injury as the sole or predominant intraperitoneal injury detected with preoperative CT. While patients with high grades of splenic injury generally required early surgery, eight (35%) of 23 patients with initial grade 3 or 4 injury were treated successfully without surgery, and four (29%) of 15 patients with grade 1 or 2 injury initially treated nonsurgically required delayed celiotomy (n = 3) or emergency rehospitalization. Results show that while CT remains an accurate method of identifying and quantifying initial splenic injury, as well as documenting progression or healing of critical injury, CT cannot reliably help predict the outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults. Treatment choices should therefore be based on the hemodynamic status of the patient and results of serial laboratory and bedside assessments.     

Blunt abdominal trauma in children: evaluation with emergency US

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of emergency abdominal ultrasonography (US) in the detection of both hemoperitoneum and parenchymal organ injury in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging findings were recorded prospectively in 744 consecutive children who underwent emergency US from January 1995 to October 1998; free fluid and parenchymal abnormalities of specific organs were also noted. Patients with intraabdominal injuries were identified retrospectively. Computed tomographic (CT) findings, intraoperative findings, and clinical outcome were compared with the initial US findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for patients who underwent CT, laparotomy, or both after US. RESULTS: Seventy-five (10%) of 744 patients had intraabdominal injuries, and US depicted free fluid in 42 of them. US had 56% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value for detection of hemoperitoneum alone. US helped identify parenchymal abnormalities that corresponded to actual organ injury without accompanying free fluid in nine patients (12%). Inclusion of identification of parenchymal organ injury at US increased the sensitivity of US to 68%, with an accuracy of 92%. CONCLUSION: US for blunt abdominal trauma in children is highly accurate and specific, but moderately sensitive, for detection of intraabdominal injury.     

Splenic trauma in adults: impact of CT grading on management

The impact of computed tomographic (CT) grading of splenic injury on case management was evaluated in 64 adult patients who underwent abdominal CT within 24 hours of blunt abdominal trauma. Severity of splenic parenchymal disruption and the presence of hemoperitoneum were each graded on a scale of 0-3 (maximal total score = 6). The splenic injury was graded retrospectively (stage 1) in 29 patients and prospectively (stage 2) in 35 patients. Patients who were treated surgically had a significantly higher score than those who were treated conservatively (3.8 vs 1.9 in stage 1, 4.1 vs 1.7 in stage 2, P less than .001 for both stages). Data analysis showed that patients with a splenic score of less than 2.5 can be treated safely without surgery, while patients with a splenic score of 2.5 or more are more likely to need surgery. In the latter group of patients, CT scoring did not change the operative rate (74% vs 75%) but did prompt earlier surgical intervention in stage 2. This significantly increased the rate at which spleen-saving operations were performed (from 21% to 67%, P less than .032) and the overall rate of splenic salvage. The CT scoring system used in this study appears to be a simple, reproducible, and useful method for quantitating splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma.     

Penetrating stab wounds to the abdomen: use of serial US and contrast-enhanced CT in stable patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) for the initial assessment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds in patients who presented to the emergency department without indication for immediate laparotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 36 months, 32 patients with a penetrating stab wound to the abdomen were examined with serial US (at admission and 12 hours later) and helical CT, with contrast material administered orally, intravenously, and rectally. Presence of hemoperitoneum and integrity of solid and hollow viscera were evaluated with both methods. Sonograms were interpreted by the radiologist who performed the examination, and CT images were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Findings of both techniques were compared with clinical outcome and/or surgical findings. RESULTS: One (3.1%) of 32 patients required surgery: Surgical findings were massive hemoperitoneum and an extensive hepatic laceration. Both US and CT depicted these abnormalities. Thirty-one (96.9%) patients were treated conservatively, without surgery, and remained asymptomatic during 28 days of clinical follow-up after discharge from the hospital. US and/or CT showed intraperitoneal abnormalities in 21 of these patients. In 11 patients, both methods showed no evidence of visceral injury or hemoperitoneum, and none of these patients required surgery. CONCLUSION: Serial US and CT help guide treatment for stable patients with penetrating stab injuries to the abdomen.     

Blunt trauma in children: significance of peritoneal fluid

Seven hundred ninety consecutively seen children who had not undergone peritoneal lavage underwent imaging with computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma. Collections of peritoneal fluid were prospectively characterized as small (51 children), moderate (32 children), or large (40 children). Associated injuries included hepatic or splenic injury in 74%, isolated renal or pancreatic injury in 5%, isolated pelvic fracture in 5%, isolated hollow viscus injury in 5%, and a combination of the above in 7%. Peritoneal fluid was the only CT abnormality in three children. A significant correlation was found between presence and increasing size of peritoneal fluid collections and clinical signs of hemodynamic instability such as lower trauma score (P = .0008 by analysis of variance), the presence of arterial hypotension (P = .0001 by chi 2 test), and hematocrit less than 30% (0.30) (P = .0001 by chi 2 test). Additionally, the presence and amount of peritoneal fluid correlated with need for laparotomy and with mortality (P = .0001 by chi 2 test for both).     

CT of hemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma

This article is an appraisal of the use of CT in the management of patients with unstable abdominal trauma. We examined 41 patients with abdominal trauma using noncontrast dynamic CT. In 17 patients a postcontrast dynamic CT was also carried out. On CT, 25 patients had hemoperitoneum. Thirteen patients had splenic, 12 hepatic, 6 pancreatic, 8 bowel and mesenteric, 12 renal and 2 vascular injuries. Seven patients had retroperitoneal and 2 patients adrenal hematomas. All but five lesions (three renal, one pancreatic, and one splenic) were hypodense when CT was performed earlier than 8 h following the injury. Postcontrast studies (n = 17), revealed 4 splenic, 3 hepatic, 1 pancreatic, 3 renal, and 2 bowel and mesenteric injuries beyond what was found on noncontrast CT. Surgical confirmation (n = 21) was obtained in 81.81 % of splenic, 66.66 % of hepatic, 83.33 % of pancreatic, 100 % of renal, 100 % of retroperitoneal, and 85.71 % of bowel and mesenteric injuries. The majority of false diagnoses was obtained with noncontrast studies. Computed tomography is a remarkable method for evaluation and management of patients with hemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma, but only if it is revealed in the emergency room. Contrast injection, when it could be done, revealed lesions that were not suspected on initial plain scans. Received: 13 March 1997; Revision received: 1 December 1997; Accepted: 6 May 1998     

Radiologic aspects of abdominal hydatidosis in children: a study of 31 cases in Turkey

OBJECTIVE: To determine the location and radiological characteristics in children with abdominal hydatid disease (HD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one children (average age: 7.2 years) with abdominal HD were studied. The number, location, diameter and internal architecture of the cysts were assessed with abdominal ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). Density measurements and enhancement patterns were determined on CT. RESULTS: Twenty-one children had hepatic HD. The remaining 10 children had both hepatic and extrahepatic cysts. There were splenic cysts in five children, peritoneal cysts in two children and combined splenic and peritoneal cysts in three children. The most common site of the cysts was the liver (64%), followed by the spleen (20%) and the peritoneal cavity (16%). The seven intraabdominal cysts, which were not detected by US, were 20 mm or less in diameter. CONCLUSION: CT may demonstrate additional small intrahepatic or unsuspected extrahepatic cysts. Although rare, splenic or peritoneal hydatidosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of a cystic splenic or peritoneal lesion. Familiarity with atypical locations of HD may be helpful in making a prompt, accurate diagnosis. We think that in particular patients, especially those who had diagnostic problem and who are under surgical planning, CT should be performed additionally.     

Triple-contrast helical CT in penetrating torso trauma: a prospective study to determine peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was performed to determine the usefulness of triple-contrast helical CT in predicting peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy in the treatment of penetrating torso trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Triple-contrast helical CT scans were obtained in 104 hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injuries to the torso (thoracoabdominal region including tangential wounds to the anterior abdomen, flank, back, and pelvis) over a 17-month period. The study group included 54 patients with gunshot wounds and 50 with stab wounds. No patient had a radiographic or clinical indication for immediate laparotomy. A positive finding on CT was defined as evidence of peritoneal violation or injury to the retroperitoneal colon, major vessel, or urinary tract. Patients with a positive CT, except patients with isolated liver injury or free fluid, underwent laparotomy. Patients with a negative finding on CT were initially observed. RESULTS: CT studies were positive in 35 (34%) of 104 patients and negative in 69 (66%) of 104 of patients. Laparotomy was performed in 21 (60%) of 35 patients with positive CT; 19 (86%) of 22 were therapeutic, two (9%) were nontherapeutic, and one (5%) was negative (no injury was found). Nine patients with isolated hepatic injuries were successfully treated without laparotomy. Among patients with a negative CT, 67 (97%) of 69 were treated nonoperatively with success. CT had 100% (19/19) sensitivity, 96% (69/72) specificity, 100% (69/69) negative predictive value, and 97% (101/104) accuracy in predicting the need for laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Triple-contrast helical CT can accurately predict the need for laparotomy and exclude peritoneal violation in penetrating torso trauma including tangential abdominal wounds.     

CT detection of hepatic and splenic injuries: usefulness of liver window settings

OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to assess the usefulness of liver window settings when performing abdominal CT for the detection and characterization of hepatic and splenic injuries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively evaluated helical abdominal CT scans for hepatic and splenic injuries in 300 consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma over a 4-month period. There were 204 males and 96 females with a mean age of 34 years (age range, 1-87 years). For each patient, initial CT diagnosis of hepatic or splenic injury was made from images obtained with standard abdominal window settings. CT scans were then immediately reinterpreted using additional images obtained at narrow window width (liver windows). Changes in conspicuity and characterization of injury were recorded. All CT examinations were performed with helical 7-mm collimation at a pitch of 1.5 after oral ingestion of diluted barium and during bolus IV administration of 125 mL of ioversol at a rate of 2-3 mL/sec. RESULTS. We detected hepatic or splenic injuries in 34 patients (11.3%). There were 19 hepatic injuries and 18 splenic injuries. Three patients had injuries to both liver and spleen. Conspicuity of hepatic or splenic injuries was mildly increased (+1 H) on liver windows in 16 patients, whereas the injury was equally conspicuous on both liver window and standard window images in 19 cases. In no case did review of the liver windows result in a change in grade of injury or reveal an injury that was not seen on standard abdominal window images. The total increased cost for printing liver windows was $5748. CONCLUSION. Routine use of liver window settings for abdominal CT in trauma patients has little clinical usefulness and is not cost-effective.     

Nonoperative management of hepatic trauma

In an attempt to determine whether selective, nonoperative management of hepatic trauma might be efficacious, a retrospective review of liver injuries was undertaken. Of the 48 patients with liver injuries identified, there were 34 men and 14 women with an average age of 28.5 years. Mechanism of injury consisted of blunt trauma in 23 patients, stab wounds in 14 patients, and 11 patients had gunshot wounds. There were 12 grade I injuries, 15 grade II injuries, 17 grade III injuries, 2 grade IV injuries, and 1 grade V injury. Diagnosis of liver trauma was made at the time of exploratory laparotomy in 15 patients and suggested by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in 18 patients; the remaining 15 patients had a positive peritoneal lavage which led to exploratory laparotomy. Following blunt trauma, 14 patients, all of whom underwent diagnostic abdominal CT scans which confirmed hepatic injury, had nonoperative treatment. All patients who received nonoperative management maintained stable vital signs and only five required transfusion. None of the patients who were treated nonoperatively developed complications or required delayed laparotomy. There were no deaths in this group. Of the 34 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy, 19 required either no treatment or minor hepatorrhaphy. However, 17 of 25 patients with penetrating wounds had associated abdominal injuries which required operative treatment. Based on the information obtained in this review, it is recommended that stable patients with isolated hepatic injuries, secondary to blunt trauma confirmed by CT scan, may be managed nonoperatively. Due to the high frequency of associated injuries found in patients with penetrating trauma, nonoperative therapy is not advised.     

Visceral injury without hemoperitoneum: A limitation of screening abdominal sonography for trauma

Abdominal sonography for the detection of hemoperitoneum has become increasingly popular as a screening test for visceral injury after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and clinical significance (outcome) of abdominal organ injuries that occur without hemoperitoneum on the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma patients.During a 12-month period, 3392 blunt trauma patients were admitted to our center. Sonographic studies were performed as an initial screening evaluation to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum in 772 (22.7%) of these patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were verified by computed tomography (CT) or surgery in 196 (5.8%) of all blunt trauma admissions. Sonography, CT, and operative findings were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in patients with abdominal injury. Patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were further analyzed to identify the type of injury and the management required.A total of 246 abdominal injuries were identified in 196 patients. Fifty (26%) patients with abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed by admission CT scan had no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Admission sonography performed in 15 (30%) of these 50 patients also showed no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Visceral injuries detected by CT in the patients without hemoperitoneum included 22 of 100 splenic injuries (22%), 18 of 91 hepatic injuries (20%), 12 of 26 renal injuries (46%), and 1 of 9 mesenteric injuries (11%). Surgery was required to manage injuries in 10 of these patients.Up to 26% of blunt trauma patients with abdominal visceral injuries do not have associated hemoperitoneum identified on admission abdominal CT or sonography. Dependence on hemoperitoneum as the sole criterion of abdominal visceral injury after blunt trauma will result in falsely negative examinations and will miss potentially significant injuries.     

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: considerations after 5 years of experience

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in a large series of patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Materials and methods

We studied 133 haemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Patients were assessed by ultrasonography (US), CEUS and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) with and without administration of a contrast agent. The study was approved by our hospital ethics committee (clinical study no. 1/2004/O).

Results

In the 133 selected patients, CT identified 84 lesions; namely, 48 splenic, 21 hepatic, 13 renal or adrenal and two pancreatic. US identified free fluid or parenchymal alterations in 59/84 patients with positive CT and free fluid in 20/49 patients with negative CT. CEUS detected 81/84 traumatic lesions identified on CT and ruled out traumatic lesions in 48/49 patients with negative CT. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of US were 70.2%, 59.2%, 74.7% and 53.7%, respectively, whereas those of CEUS were 96.4%, 98%, 98.8% and 94.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study showed that CEUS is an accurate technique for evaluating traumatic lesions of solid abdominal organs. The technique is able to detect active bleeding and vascular lesions, avoids exposure to ionising radiation and is useful for monitoring patients undergoing conservative treatment.     

A 10-year restrospective evaluation of ultrasound in pregnant abdominal trauma patients

The pregnant abdominal trauma patient presents a unique diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of abdominal sonography for the detection of clinically important injuries in pregnant abdominal trauma patients. A retrospective review was performed of a trauma center database from 2001 to 2011. Medical records were reviewed to determine initial abdominal imaging test results and clinical course. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasound for detection of traumatic injury were calculated. Of 19,128 patients with suspected abdominal trauma, 385 (2 %) were pregnant. Of these, 372 (97 %) received ultrasound as the initial abdominal imaging test. All 13 pregnant patients who did not receive ultrasound received abdominal CT. Seven pregnant patients underwent both ultrasound and CT. Seven ultrasound examinations were positive, leading to one therapeutic Cesarean section and one laparotomy. One ultrasound was considered false positive (no injury was seen on subsequent CT). There were 365 negative ultrasound examinations. Of these, 364 were true negative (no abdominal injury subsequently found). One ultrasound was considered false negative (a large fetal subchorionic hemorrhage seen on subsequent dedicated obstetrical ultrasound). Sensitivity and positive predictive value were 85.7 %. Specificity and negative predictive value were 99.7 %. Abdominal sonography is an effective and sufficient imaging examination in pregnant abdominal trauma patients. When performed as part of the initial assessment using an abbreviated trauma protocol with brief modifications for pregnancy, ultrasound minimizes diagnostic delay, obviates radiation risk, and provides high sensitivity for injury in the pregnant population.     

Safety-belt injuries in children with lap-belt ecchymosis: CT findings in 61 patients

We have noted a complex of common injuries in children wearing lap-styled safety belts during vehicular accidents. Sixty-one children who were restrained passengers in motor vehicle crashes had linear ecchymosis across the abdomen and had CT for abdominal trauma. Thirteen children (21%) had a lumbar spine injury, and 14 children (23%) injured a hollow viscus (bowel, 12; bladder, two); five children (8%) had both spine and hollow viscus injuries. Abnormal findings on abdominal CT were recognized retrospectively in three of 13 children with lumbar spinal injury. Lateral radiographs of the spine showed lumbar spinal injury in all cases. Free intraperitoneal air was noted in on three (25%) of 12 children with bowel injury. In eight of those children, CT showed large, unexplained collections of peritoneal fluid. The presence of lap-belt ecchymosis should prompt a careful search for spine, bowel, and bladder injury. Recognition of the limitations of CT diagnosis of these injuries is important to reduce errors in interpretation.     

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen: examination technique and preliminary clinical experience

PURPOSE: To report our preliminary experience in the evaluation of the spleen using a real-time contrast-specific ultrasound module in combination with a second-generation contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 7-month period, 55 patients (34 males and 21 females, aged 5-77 years) with spleen disorders were evaluated by means of contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Two patients were studied because of baseline evidence of an accessory spleen and both underwent ultrasound follow-up. Twenty-five patients were studied for abdominal trauma and results were correlated with those of helical CT. Three patients were examined for suspected splenic infarction and for all CT correlation was obtained. Finally, twenty-five subjects were examined for focal diseases, such as lymphomas (17 cases) and focal lesions (8 cases); contrast-enhanced US results were correlated with those of CT (8 cases), MRI (2 cases), ultrasound follow-up (8 cases), biopsy (2 cases) or splenectomy (1 case). After an initial baseline study, the contrast-enhanced examinations were carried out using a dedicated unit equipped with a continuous contrast-specific module at low acoustic pressure. The examination started immediately after rapid contrast injection and lasted approximately 4 minutes. In the comparison between baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the following aspects were considered: detection rate of parenchymal changes, lesion extent (equal to CT, under- or overestimated), and lesion conspicuity (lesion-to-parenchyma gradient, from 0 = absent to 3 = high). RESULTS: In the 2 patients with accessory spleen, an enhancement very similar to that of the adjacent parenchyma was present and a small vascular pedicle was noted. Among the trauma patients, 18 had a direct splenic injury and one showed splenic contraction and hypoperfusion due to shock. In 74% of cases, a peritoneal effusion was demonstrated both with baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound; perisplenic blood collections (58% of cases) were identified in 42% of patients by both baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound; post-traumatic infarction was always revealed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (11% of cases) but never by baseline ultrasound; parenchymal injuries were detected with a sensitivity of 63% by baseline ultrasound and a sensitivity of 89% by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Moreover, contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed findings undetectable on conventional ultrasound: global splenic hypoperfusion in 2 cases (due to shock in one and pedicle avulsion in the other), intraparenchymal contrast collections in 21% of positive cases (as confirmed by CT), extrasplenic contrast leakage in 1 of 2 cases demonstrated by CT. Of the 3 cases of splenic infarction, baseline sonography only only identified two, whereas the contrast-enhanced examination clearly identified three. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed 35 of 39 focal lesions in patients studied for Hodgkin's disease and splenic focal lesions. Baseline ultrasound had a lower sensitivity (23 lesions). Lesion extension shown by contrast-enhanced sonography was equivalent to that provided by standard methods in 88% of cases (underestimated in 9% and overestimated in 3%); baseline US correctly estimated lesion size in 52% of cases, under- and overestimating them in 35% and 13% of cases, respectively. Lesion conspicuity was graded as 1 (low) in 16%, 2 (moderate) in 67%, and 3 (high) in 17% of the cases identified by enhanced sonography. Baseline ultrasound was less effective: conspicuity was graded as 1 in 42%, 2 in 39%, and 3 in 19% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The spleen is the ideal organ to be studied with second-generation contrast media due to its superficial location, high vascularity, small size and homogeneous texture. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a simple, poorly-invasive and accurate tool for the evaluation of splenic disorders. If our data are confirmed, it will be possible to reduce the use of more complex technologies such as CT and MRI.     

The role of arterial embolization in blunt splenic injury

Purpose

The aim of study was to evaluate the results of our experience with transarterial embolization based on a modified algorithm in patients with splenic injury.

Materials and methods

We collected data of patients admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to August 2008 for blunt splenic injury. During this period, 46 patients were admitted for splenic trauma, of whom 17 were treated surgically, 15 conservatively and 14 with percutaneous embolisation (13 men, mean age 44.8, mean injury severity score 18.5, six with grade IV and eight with contrast blush). Patients in shock were referred for laparotomy and splenectomy, whereas those who were haemodynamically stable or responsive to fluid resuscitation were further evaluated with computed tomography (CT). In the presence of imaging evidence of splenic injury ranging from grade I to grade III (n=15) a conservative approach was adopted, whereas haemodynamically unstable patients with grade V injury (n=17) were treated with splenectomy. Embolisation was performed in 14 patients with grade IV injury or in the event of contrast extravasation, regardless of injury grade. In patients with diffuse organ damage, we embolised the main splenic artery, whereas in the case of localised injury, embolisation was selective.

Results

Proximal embolization was required in eight cases and distal coil embolization in six. In 13 cases, we placed magnetic-resonance-compatible coils 4?C6 mm in diameter; only one patient was treated with gel-foam injection. Immediate technical success was achieved in all cases. In 13/14 patients (92.9%), no periprocedural complications were observed, whereas the remaining patient underwent splenectomy within 24 h due to recurrent bleeding.

Conclusions

On the basis of our algorithm, it is possible to reach a quick decision on the most appropriate treatment for patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic artery embolization seems to offer a reliable option in those with high-grade splenic injury or active bleeding.     

Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.

PURPOSE: To determine, at screening ultrasonography, the prevalence, severity, and clinical outcome of clinically important abdominal visceral injuries, without associated hemoperitoneum, that result from blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) was performed at admission in 466 patients with visceral injury. A retrospective review was performed of findings from surgery and contrast material-enhanced spiral and conventional CT performed to verify abdominal visceral injuries in 467 (4%) of 11,188 patients with blunt trauma. These patients were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over 33 months to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum and to identify the grade of injury. Medical records of patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were reviewed for the management required and for results of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). RESULTS: A total of 575 abdominal visceral injuries were identified at CT and/or surgery. Findings of CT at admission (n = 156) and of surgery (n = 1) revealed no evidence of hemoperitoneum in 157 (34%) patients with abdominal visceral injury; 26 (17%) of whom also had negative FAST studies. Abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed in patients without hemoperitoneum included 57 (27%) of 210 splenic injuries, 71 (34%) of 206 hepatic injuries, 30 (48%) of 63 renal injuries, four (11%) of 35 mesenteric injuries, and two (29%) of seven pancreatic injuries. Surgical and/or angiographic intervention was required in 26 (17%) patients without hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on the presence of hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injury limits the value of FAST as a screening diagnostic modality for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma.     

Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries?

PURPOSE: To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography (US) for indirect (with free fluid analysis only) and direct (with free fluid and parenchymal analysis) detection of organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with findings at computed tomography (CT) and/or surgery as the standard of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal US was performed at hospital admission in consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The presence of free peritoneal fluid and organ injury were recorded and compared with results of abdominal CT in all hemodynamically stable patients. When US results were considered false-negative for free fluid or organ injury compared with CT results, repeat US was performed within 6 hours. Admission and second US results were compared with CT and/or surgical results to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of US with regard to the presence of free intraperitoneal fluid and/or organ injury. RESULTS: Two hundred five hemodynamically stable patients underwent abdominal US and CT. CT revealed free fluid in 83 patients and organ injury in 99. Thirty-one (31%) of 99 patients with organ injury did not have free fluid at CT. Three (10%) of the 31 patients required surgery or angiographic embolization. The sensitivity of admission US was 93% (77 of 83 cases) for the diagnosis of free fluid, 41% (39 of 99) for directly demonstrating organ injury, and 72% (71 of 99) for suggesting organ injury by means of both free fluid and organ analysis. At second US, these sensitivities were 96% (80 of 83 cases), 55% (54 of 99) and 84% (83 of 99), respectively. CONCLUSION: US is highly sensitive for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid but not sensitive for the identification of organ injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the value of US is mainly limited by the large percentage of organ injuries that are not associated with free fluid.     

Traumatic injuries: imaging and intervention in post-traumatic complications (delayed intervention)

The nonoperative management (NOM) of abdominal trauma has gained increasing acceptance over the past decade. This approach has been extended to severe trauma patients previously considered as candidates for surgery. Consequently, the incidence of delayed and uncommonly encountered complications has increased. Causes of delayed complications are multiple and include: (a) abnormal or insufficient injury healing process; (b) retention of necrotic tissue; (c) secondary infection of initially sterile collections; and (d) underestimation of injury severity. The purpose of this review article is to explain the role of various imaging modalities in detecting post-traumatic delayed complications and to highlight the usefulness of minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopy, biliary endoscopy, therapeutic angiography and image-guided drainage. Subsequent complications, which do not necessarily negatively influence the final outcome, are often predictable, virtually obligatory consequences of the successful NOM of high-grade or complex abdominal injuries. Between 50 and 60% of those patients with grade-IV or grade-V liver or splenic lacerations require some type of interventional treatment; therefore, indiscriminate discharge of patients with solid organ injury managed conservatively may be potentially harmful. As the incidence of complications is higher for more severe grade-IV or grade-V liver, spleen, or kidney injuries, scheduled follow-up CT scans may be rational in this subset of patients to identify potential complications amenable to early application of interventional techniques. Follow-up CT scans are unnecessary in stable adults or children with low-grade injury. Delayed splenic or hepatic rupture is one of the major concerns because this type of complication remains difficult to predict and historically often requires emergent surgery. These ruptures may benefit from NOM, should the same criteria as for primary rupture be respected. Conversely, parenchymatous focal pooling of contrast on initial CT is a good predictor for the development of delayed vascular malformation. In children, as a large part of splenic and hepatic vascular malformations resolve spontaneously, expectant observation may be indicated provided that a strict imaging follow-up is performed until complete disappearance of these lesions. If needed, embolization of parenchymal vascular lesions should be performed as selectively as possible in order to avoid functional parenchyma loss and to reduce the risk of secondary infection of hematoma or ischemic tissue. Technical improvements, such as microcatheter systems and direct percutaneous approach to targeted lesions, have widened the potential for safe endovascular management of acquired vascular malformations. Advantages and disadvantages relative to the different embolic agents are explained. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography is the chief investigational tool for detecting biliary and pancreatic ducts injuries. The respective roles of endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical approaches in the management of these complications are discussed. The CT scan and ultrasound-guided drainage provide effective nonoperative options in the management of post-traumatic parenchymatous and (retro)-peritoneal collections. Treatment modalities of less common complications, such as bowel stricture or perforation, mesenteric vascular injuries and renal trauma-induced hypertension, are reviewed.