Terminal Deletion of 11q with Significant Late-Onset Combined Immune Deficiency

Purpose

We report a 45-year old female adult patient with terminal deletion of chromosome 11q resulting in clinical phenotype of late-onset combined immunodeficiency.

Methods

We describe the clinical phenotype and discuss the similarities between our patient and those with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Immunological evaluation included immunoglobulin levels, vaccine responses, number and function of T, NK and B cell subsets and comparative genomic hybridization test of blood and fibroblasts.

Results

The patient suffered from recurrent pneumococcal pneumonia and genital and cutaneous condylomas. She had a history of learning difficulties, dysmorphic features, autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic thrombocytopenia and severe asthma. We found Paris-Trousseau type thrombocytopenia, B-, T- and NK-lymphopenia, T cell oligoclonality and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia with inability to respond to pneumococcal polysaccharide, tetanus and diphtheria vaccines. A terminal deletion of chromosome 11q compatible with partial Jacobsen syndrome was found.

Conclusions

This confirms Jacobsen syndrome as a chromosome deletion syndrome able to cause combined immunodeficiency.     

CCL3L1 copy number, CCR5 genotype and susceptibility to tuberculosis

Background

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a common microdeletion syndrome, which occurs in approximately 1:4000 births. Familial autosomal dominant recurrence of the syndrome is detected in about 8-28% of the cases. Aim of this study is to evaluate the intergenerational and intrafamilial phenotypic variability in a cohort of familial cases carrying a 22q11.2 deletion.

Methods

Thirty-two 22q11.2DS subjects among 26 families were enrolled.

Results

Second generation subjects showed a significantly higher number of features than their transmitting parents (212 vs 129, P?=?0.0015). Congenital heart defect, calcium-phosphorus metabolism abnormalities, developmental and speech delay were more represented in the second generation (P?<?0.05). Ocular disorders were more frequent in the parent group. No significant difference was observed for the other clinical variables. Intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneity was identified in the pedigrees. In 23/32 families, a higher number of features were found in individuals from the second generation and a more severe phenotype was observed in almost all of them, indicating the worsening of the phenotype over generations. Both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms may be involved in the phenotypic variability.

Conclusions

Second generation subjects showed a more complex phenotype in comparison to those from the first generation. Both ascertainment bias related to patient selection or to the low rate of reproductive fitness of adults with a more severe phenotype, and several not well defined molecular mechanism, could explain intergenerational and intrafamilial phenotypic variability in this syndrome.     

Primary lymphedema and other lymphatic anomalies are associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Background

Lymphedema is an abnormal accumulation of interstitial fluid within the tissues. Primary lymphedema is caused by aberrant lymphangiogenesis and it has been historically classified based on age at presentation. Although most cases are sporadic, primary lymphedema may be familial or present in association with chromosomal abnormalities and syndromic disorders. To the best of our knowledge, primary lymphedema has never been described in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Small supernumerary marker chromosome 15 and a ring chromosome 15 associated with a 15q26.3 deletion excluding the IGF1R gene

Array comparative genomic hybridization is essential in the investigation of chromosomal rearrangements associated with epilepsy, intellectual disability, and dysmorphic features. In many cases deletions, duplications, additional marker chromosomes, and ring chromosomes originating from chromosome 15 lead to abnormal phenotypes. We present a child with epilepsy, cardiac symptoms, severely delayed mental and growth development, behavioral disturbances and characteristic dysmorphic features showing a ring chromosome 15 and a small supernumerary marker chromosome. Array CGH detected a 1 Mb deletion of 15q26.3 in a ring chromosome 15 and a 2.6 Mb copy number gain of 15q11.2 corresponding to a small supernumerary marker chromosome involving proximal 15q. Our findings add to previously published results of 15q11q13 duplications and 15q26 terminal deletions. Based on our study we can support the previous reported limited information about the role of SELS, SNRPA1, and PCSK6 genes in the development of the heart morphology. On the other hand, we found that the copy number loss of our patient did not involve the IGF1R gene which is often associated with growth retardation (short stature and decreased weight). We hypothesize that haploinsufficiency of the 15q26 genomic region distal to IGF1R gene might be related to growth disturbance; however, presence of the ring chromosome 15 itself could also be responsible for the growth delay.

     

Novel intragenic deletions within the <Emphasis Type="Italic">UBE3A</Emphasis> gene in two unrelated patients with Angelman syndrome: case report and review of the literature

Background

Patients with Angelman syndrome (AS) are affected by severe intellectual disability with absence of speech, distinctive dysmorphic craniofacial features, ataxia and a characteristic behavioral phenotype. AS is caused by the lack of expression in neurons of the UBE3A gene, which is located in the 15q11.2-q13 imprinted region. Functional loss of UBE3A is due to 15q11.2-q13 deletion, mutations in the UBE3A gene, paternal uniparental disomy and genomic imprinting defects.

Case presentation

We report here two patients with clinical features of AS referred to our hospital for clinical follow-up and genetic diagnosis. Methylation Specific-Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) of the 15q11.2-q13 region was carried out in our laboratory as the first diagnostic tool detecting two novel UBE3A intragenic deletions. Subsequently, the MLPA P336-A2 kit was used to confirm and determine the size of the UBE3A deletion in the two patients. A review of the clinical features of previously reported patients with whole UBE3A gene or partial intragenic deletions is presented here together with these two new patients.

Conclusion

Although rare, UBE3A intragenic deletions may represent a small fraction of AS patients without a genetic diagnosis. Testing for UBE3A intragenic exonic deletions should be performed in those AS patients with a normal methylation pattern and no mutations in the UBE3A gene.

     

Detailed analysis of 22q11.2 with a high density MLPA probe set

The presence of chromosome-specific low-copy repeats (LCRs) predisposes chromosome 22 to deletions and duplications. The current diagnostic procedure for detecting aberrations at 22q11.2 is chromosomal analysis coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or PCR-based multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA). However, there are copy number variations (CNVs) in 22q11.2 that are only detected by high-resolution platforms such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We report on development of a high-definition MLPA (MLPA-HD) 22q11 kit that detects copy number changes at 37 loci on the long arm of chromosome 22. These include the 3-Mb region commonly deleted in DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DGS/VCFS), the cat eye syndrome (CES) region, and more distal regions in 22q11 that have recently been shown to be deleted. We have used this MLPA-HD probe set to analyze 363 previously well-characterized samples with a variety of different rearrangements at 22q11 and demonstrate that it can detect copy number alterations with high sensitivity and specificity. In addition to detection of the common recurrent deletions associated with DGS/VCFS, variant and novel chromosome 22 aberrations have been detected. These include duplications within as well as deletions distal to this region. Further, the MLPA-HD detects deletion endpoint differences between patients with the common 3-Mb deletion. The MLPA-HD kit is proposed as a cost effective alternative to the currently available detection methods for individuals with features of the 22q11 aberrations. In patients with the relevant phenotypic characteristics, this MLPA-HD probe set could replace FISH for the clinical diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletions and duplications.     

13q Deletion and central nervous system anomalies: further insights from karyotype-phenotype analyses of 14 patients

Background

Chromosome 13q deletion is associated with varying phenotypes, which seem to depend on the location of the deleted segment. Although various attempts have been made to link the 13q deletion intervals to distinct phenotypes, there is still no acknowledged consensus correlation between the monosomy of distinct 13q regions and specific clinical features.

Methods

14 Italian patients carrying partial de novo 13q deletions were studied. Molecular–cytogenetic characterisation was carried out by means of array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (array‐CGH) or fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Results

Our 14 patients showed mental retardation ranging from profound–severe to moderate–mild: eight had central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, including neural tube defects (NTDs), six had eye abnormalities, nine had facial dysmorphisms and 10 had hand or feet anomalies. The size of the deleted regions varied from 4.2 to 75.7 Mb.

Conclusion

This study is the first systematic molecular characterisation of de novo 13q deletions, and offers a karyotype–phenotype correlation based on detailed clinical studies and molecular determinations of the deleted regions. Analyses confirm that patients lacking the 13q32 band are the most seriously affected, and critical intervals have been preliminarily assigned for CNS malformations. Dose‐sensitive genes proximal to q33.2 may be involved in NTDs. The minimal deletion interval associated with the Dandy–Walker malformation (DWM) was narrowed to the 13q32.2–33.2 region, in which the ZIC2 and ZIC5 genes proposed as underlying various CNS malformations are mapped.The 13q‐syndrome is caused by structural and functional monosomy of the 13q chromosomal regions. Carriers of 13q partial deletions may have widely varying phenotypes, but the most common clinical features include moderate–severe mental and growth retardation, craniofacial dysmorphisms, hand and foot anomalies, and brain, heart and kidney defects^1,2,3,4 (http://www.ecaruca.net). Several attempts have been made over the years to correlate 13q deletion intervals with distinct phenotypes. Niebuhr⁵ suggested that distal deletions are closely associated with severe phenotypes, whereas proximal deletions tend to cause fewer major anomalies, with the exception of retinoblastoma. Brown et al^3,6 defined 13q32 as the critical band for the most severe phenotypes, showing that monosomy of a 1.2‐Mb region in q32 is related to the development of severe mental and growth retardation, as well as major malformations including brain abnormalities. The ZIC2 (zinc finger protein of cerebellum 2) gene maps to this critical region and has been considered a plausible candidate for brain anomalies. ZIC2 mutations have been associated with holoprosencephaly (HPE),^7,8 thus leading to the hypothesis that ZIC2 hemizygosity may contribute to the severe brain malformations of patients with del(13q). Luo et al⁹ have suggested that one or more of the genes mapping to 13q33–34 may be responsible for the expression of neural tube defects (NTDs) as a result of haploinsufficiency. McCormack et al¹⁰ and Alanay et al¹¹ have suggested that the 13q22–33 region is critical for the development of the Dandy–Walker malformation (DWM), which implies the existence of at least one other dose‐sensitive gene (in addition to ZIC2) that has a role in cerebellar development.There is still no consensus on possible correlations between the monosomy of distinct 13q regions and specific clinical features. Here, we describe 14 cases of de novo 13q partial deletions (seven terminal and seven interstitial) and their characterisation by means of conventional cytogenetics, array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (array‐CGH) or fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), in an attempt to address the karyotype–phenotype correlations.     

Parental and chromosomal origins of microdeletion and duplication syndromes involving 7q11.23, 15q11-q13 and 22q11

Non-allelic homologous recombination between chromosome-specific LCRs is the most common mechanism leading to recurrent microdeletions and duplications. To look for locus-specific differences, we have used microsatellites to determine the parental and chromosomal origins of a large series of patients with de novo deletions of chromosome 7q11.23 (Williams syndrome), 15q11-q13 (Angelman syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome) and 22q11 (Di George syndrome) and duplications of 15q11-q13. Overall the majority of rearrangements were interchromosomal, so arising from unequal meiotic exchange, and there were approximately equal numbers of maternal and paternal deletions. Duplications and deletions of 15q11-q13 appear to be reciprocal products that arise by the same mechanisms. The proportion arising from interchromosomal exchanges varied among deletions with 22q11 the highest and 15q11-q13 the lowest. However, parental and chromosomal origins were not always independent. For 15q11-q13, maternal deletions tended to be interchromosomal while paternal deletions tended to be intrachromosomal; for 22q11 there was a possible excess of maternal cases among intrachromosomal deletions. Several factors are likely to be involved in the formation of recurrent rearrangements and the relative importance of these appear to be locus-specific.     

Identification of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome via Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Purpose

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), the most common cause of DiGeorge syndrome, is quite variable. Neonatal diagnosis traditionally relies on recognition of classic features and cytogenetic testing, but many patients come to attention only following identification of later onset conditions, such as hypernasal speech due to palatal insufficiency and developmental and behavioral differences including speech delay, autism, and learning disabilities that would benefit from early interventions. Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is now identifying infants with 22q11.2DS due to T cell lymphopenia. Here, we report findings in such neonates, underscoring the efficacy of early diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 1350 patients with 22q11.2DS evaluated at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia identified 11 newborns with a positive NBS for SCID.

Results

Five out of 11 would have been diagnosed with 22q11.2DS without NBS, whereas early identification of 22q11.2DS in 6/11 led to the diagnosis of significant associated features including hypocalcemia, congenital heart disease (CHD), and gastroesophageal reflux disease that may have gone unrecognized and therefore untreated.

Conclusions

Our findings support rapidly screening infants with a positive NBS for SCID, but without SCID, for 22q11.2DS even when typically associated features such as CHD are absent, particularly when B cells and NK cells are normal. Moreover, direct NBS for 22q11.2DS using multiplex qPCR would be equally, if not more, beneficial, as early identification of 22q11.2DS will obviate a protracted diagnostic odyssey while providing an opportunity for timely assessment and interventions as needed, even in the absence of T cell lymphopenia.

     

Analytical approaches to detect maternal/fetal genotype incompatibilities that increase risk of pre-eclampsia

Background

Kabuki syndrome (KS) is a multiple congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by specific facial features, mild to moderate mental retardation, postnatal growth delay, skeletal abnormalities, and unusual dermatoglyphic patterns with prominent fingertip pads. A 3.5 Mb duplication at 8p23.1-p22 was once reported as a specific alteration in KS but has not been confirmed in other patients. The molecular basis of KS remains unknown.

Methods

We have studied 16 Spanish patients with a clinical diagnosis of KS or KS-like to search for genomic imbalances using genome-wide array technologies. All putative rearrangements were confirmed by FISH, microsatellite markers and/or MLPA assays, which also determined whether the imbalance was de novo or inherited.

Results

No duplication at 8p23.1-p22 was observed in our patients. We detected complex rearrangements involving 2q in two patients with Kabuki-like features: 1) a de novo inverted duplication of 11 Mb with a 4.5 Mb terminal deletion, and 2) a de novo 7.2 Mb-terminal deletion in a patient with an additional de novo 0.5 Mb interstitial deletion in 16p. Additional copy number variations (CNV), either inherited or reported in normal controls, were identified and interpreted as polymorphic variants. No specific CNV was significantly increased in the KS group.

Conclusion

Our results further confirmed that genomic duplications of 8p23 region are not a common cause of KS and failed to detect other recurrent rearrangement causing this disorder. The detection of two patients with 2q37 deletions suggests that there is a phenotypic overlap between the two conditions, and screening this region in the Kabuki-like patients should be considered.     

Resolution of Primary Immune Defect in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

Purpose

Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have a variable decrease in immunological parameters, especially regarding T cell counts. The aim of this study was to investigate immunological change over time and factors associated with immunological recovery among patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Methods

Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome diagnosed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were studied. Immunological parameters were evaluated every 6 months until patients returned to normal. Infection and vaccination histories were recorded and analyzed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to describe resolution of immunodeficiency.

Results

Forty-nine patients with an age range of 4 to 222 months were included. Twenty-five (51%) patients were female. In hypocalcemia, the odds ratio for CD4 lymphopenia was 17.03 (95%CI 1.82–159.23; p value = 0.01). Thirty patients (61.2%) exhibited decreased CD4+ T cell numbers, which returned to normal level in 18 (60%) patients. Median age of CD4+ T cell resolution was 2.5 years. T cell functions were abnormal in three patients. T cell functions returned to normal in all patients at a median age of 1.1 years. Six patients (13.5%) had abnormal serum immunoglobulin levels, with levels improving in four patients at 1.4 years of age. The most common infection was pneumonia (69.4%). BCG vaccination was administered in 47 of 49 patients at birth. Among 32 patients who had T cell defect, one patient developed BCGitis and one developed disseminated BCG.

Conclusion

Immunodeficiencies identified among patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were T cell defect (65.3%) and decreased immunoglobulin levels (12.2%). Median age of CD4 resolution was 2.5 years.

     

Retrospective Analysis of TREC Based Newborn Screening Results and Clinical Phenotypes in Infants with the 22q11 Deletion Syndrome

Purpose

Population-based newborn screening using T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) identifies infants with severe T-lymphopenia, seen in severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID), but also infants with the 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS). Methods for analysis of kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KREC) help identifying infants with B-lymphopenia. We aimed to evaluate the occurrence of abnormal TREC or KREC newborn screening results in 22q11DS patients and assessed the clinical relevance of abnormal screening reports.

Methods

Simultaneous TREC and KREC analysis was performed on stored original Guthrie cards. Patients with abnormal screening reports were compared to patients with normal reports, regarding lymphocyte counts and clinical severity, obtained by retrospective analysis of medical charts.

Results

Of 48 included patients, nine (19 %) had abnormal TREC copy numbers. All 22q11DS patients with abnormal TRECs had CD3+ T-lymphopenia at the time of diagnosis, but only one patient had the complete DiGeorge syndrome. Identified 22q11DS patients with abnormal TREC copy numbers showed significantly lower CD8+ T-lymphocytes at time-of-diagnosis and were significantly more prone to viral infections, compared to 22q11DS patients with normal TREC copy numbers. All 22q11DS patients showed KREC copies within the normal range.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study a high proportion of 22q11DS patients were identified by TREC-based newborn screening. Although only one of them had the complete DiGeorge syndrome with no T-lymphocytes, all of them had T-lymphopenia and most of them had recurrent viral infections, as well as other medical problems, warranting early recognition of the syndrome.     

Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in patients with anophthalmia,microphthalmia, and coloboma

PurposeThe goal of our study was to determine whether genomic copy number abnormalities (deletions and duplications) affecting genes involved in eye development contributed to the etiology of anophthalmia, microphthalmia, and coloboma.MethodsThe affected individuals were evaluated for the presence of deletions and duplications in genomic DNA by a very high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization.ResultsArray analysis of 32 patients detected one case with a deletion encompassing the renal-coloboma syndrome associated gene PAX2. Nonpolymorphic copy number changes were also observed at several candidate chromosomal regions, including 6p12.3, 8q23.1q23.2, 13q31.3, 15q11.2q13.1, 16p13.13, and 20q13.13.ConclusionThis study identified the first patient with the typical phenotype of the renal-coloboma syndrome caused by a submicroscopic deletion of the coding region of the PAX2 gene. The finding suggests that PAX2 deletion testing should be performed in addition to gene sequencing as a part of molecular evaluation for the renal-coloboma syndrome. Array comparative genomic hybridization testing of 32 affected individuals showed that genomic deletions and duplications are not a common cause of nonsyndromic anophthalmia, microphthalmia, or coloboma but undoubtedly contribute to the etiology of these eye anomalies. Therefore, array comparative genomic hybridization testing represents an important and valuable addition to candidate gene sequencing in research and diagnostics of ocular birth defects.     

Evaluating NAT2PRED for inferring the individual acetylation status from unphased genotype data

Background

Genome-wide linkage studies for Alzheimer's disease have implicated several chromosomal regions as potential loci for susceptibility genes.

Methods

In the present study, we have combined a selection of affected relative pairs (ARPs) from the UK and the USA included in a previous linkage study by Myers et al. (Am J Med Genet, 2002), with ARPs from Sweden and Washington University. In this total sample collection of 397 ARPs, we have analyzed linkage to chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 12, 19 and 21, implicated in the previous scan.

Results

The analysis revealed that linkage to chromosome 19q13 close to the APOE locus increased considerably as compared to the earlier scan. However, linkage to chromosome 10q21, which provided the strongest linkage in the previous scan could not be detected.

Conclusion

The present investigation provides yet further evidence that 19q13 is the only chromosomal region consistently linked to Alzheimer's disease.     

Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in 190 Korean Patients with Developmental Delay and/or Intellectual Disability: A Single Tertiary Care University Center Study

Purpose

This study analyzed and evaluated the demographic, clinical, and cytogenetic data [G-banded karyotyping and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH)] of patients with unexplained developmental delay or intellectual disability at a single Korean institution.

Materials and Methods

We collected clinical and cytogenetic data based on retrospective charts at Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea from April 2008 to March 2012.

Results

A total of 190 patients were identified. Mean age was 5.1±1.87 years. Array CGH yielded abnormal results in 26 of 190 patients (13.7%). Copy number losses were about two-fold more frequent than gains. A total of 61.5% of all patients had copy number losses. The most common deletion disorders included 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, 15q11.2q12 deletion and 18q deletion syndrome. Copy number gains were identified in 34.6% of patients, and common diseases among these included Potocki-Lupski syndrome, 15q11-13 duplication syndrome and duplication 22q. Abnormal karyotype with normal array CGH results was exhibited in 2.6% of patients; theses included balanced translocation (n=2), inversion (n=2) and low-level mosaicism (n=1). Facial abnormalities (p<0.001) and failure to thrive were (p<0.001) also more frequent in the group of patients with abnormal CGH findings.

Conclusion

Array CGH is a useful diagnostic tool in clinical settings in patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability combined with facial abnormalities or failure to thrive.     

Unrelated chromosomal anomalies found in patients with suspected 22q11.2 deletion

Screening for 22q11.2 deletions has not an easy approach due to the wide variability of their associated phenotype. Many clinical features overlap with those of other known syndromes and reported loci. Patients referred to exclude a 22q11.2 deletion are usually tested with a locus-specific FISH probe, with 10% positive cases depending on the selection criteria, but patients testing negative for FISH at 22q11.2 may have other chromosomal aberrations in routine cytogenetic analysis. We tested 819 patients suspected of having a 22q11.2 deletion. Eighty-eight patients (10.7%) were positive for 22q11.2 deletion, whereas 30 patients (3.7%) showed other chromosomal abnormalities involving deletions and duplications, derivative chromosomes, marker chromosomes, apparently balanced and unbalanced translocations and sex chromosome aneuploidies. Of these alterations, 28 did not involve region 22q11 and most had not been associated with 22q11.2 deletion phenotype before. We discuss the similarity of DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome with other known clinical entities and suggest correlations between the new loci and the observed clinical features. The frequency of unrelated chromosomal anomalies reported in this study and in other previous reports highlights the importance of conventional cytogenetic analysis as an initial genome-wide screening tool in all referred patients, and provides useful data to optimize diagnostic and screening protocols according to the most frequent chromosomal findings.     

Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations

Background

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by severe mental retardation, dysmorphic features, ataxia, seizures, and typical behavioural characteristics, including a happy sociable disposition. AS is caused by maternal deficiency of UBE3A (E6 associated protein ubiquitin protein ligase 3A gene), located in an imprinted region on chromosome 15q11‐q13. Although there are four different molecular types of AS, deletions of the 15q11‐q13 region account for approximately 70% of the AS patients. These deletions are usually detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation studies. The deletions can also be subclassified based on their size into class I and class II, with the former being larger and encompassing the latter.

Methods

We studied 22 patients with AS due to microdeletions using a microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) assay to define the deletions and analysed their phenotypic severity, especially expression of the autism phenotype, in order to establish clinical correlations.

Results

Overall, children with larger, class I deletions were significantly more likely to meet criteria for autism, had lower cognitive scores, and lower expressive language scores compared with children with smaller, class II deletions. Children with class I deletions also required more medications to control their seizures than did those in the class II group.

Conclusions

There are four known genes (NIPA1, NIPA2, CYFIP1, & GCP5) that are affected by class I but not class II deletions, thus raising the possibility of a role for these genes in autism as well as the development of expressive language skills.     

Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities

Background

Subtelomere fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis has increasingly been used as an adjunct to routine cytogenetic testing in order to detect small rearrangements. Previous reports have estimated an overall abnormality rate of 6%, with a range of 2–29% because of different inclusion criteria.

Methods

This study presents data compiled from 11 688 cases referred for subtelomere FISH testing in three clinical cytogenetic laboratories.

Results

In this study population, the detection rate for clinically significant subtelomere abnormalities was approximately 2.5%, with an additional 0.5% detection of presumed familial variants. Approximately half of the clinically significant abnormalities identified were terminal deletions, the majority of which were de novo. Most of the remaining cases were unbalanced translocations between two chromosomes or two arms of the same chromosome. Approximately 60% of the unbalanced translocations were inherited from a parent carrying a balanced form of the rearrangement. Other abnormalities identified included tandem duplications, apparently balanced translocations, partial deletions, and insertions. Interestingly, 9 cases (0.08%) were found to have interstitial deletions of non‐telomeric control loci, either BCR on 22q or PML on 15q. The most common clinically significant imbalances found were deletions of 1p, 22q, 4p, 9q, 8p, 2q and 20p. The most common familial variants were a deletion or duplication of 10q, deletion of 4q, deletion of Yq, and duplication of X/Yp onto Xq.

Conclusions

This study of subtelomere rearrangements is a 20 fold increase in number over the previously reported largest study and represents an unbiased analysis of subtelomere rearrangements in a large, unselected patient population.     

Mosaicism del(22)(q11.2q11.2)/dup(22)(q11.2q11.2) in a patient with features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

The chromosome 22q11 region is prone to rearrangements, including deletions and duplications, due to the presence of multiple low copy repeats (LCRs). DiGeorge/velo-cardio-facial syndrome is the most common microdeletion syndrome with more than 90% of patients having a common 3-Mb deletion of 22q11.2 secondary to non-homologous recombination of flanking LCRs. Meiotic reciprocal events caused by LCR-mediated rearrangement should theoretically lead to an equal number of deletions and duplications. Duplications of this region, however, have been infrequently reported and vary in size from 3 to 6 Mb. This discrepancy may be explained by the difficulty in detecting the duplication and the variable, sometimes quite mild phenotype. This newly described 22q duplication syndrome is characterized by palatal defects, cognitive deficits, minor ear anomalies, and characteristic facial features. We report on a male with truncus arteriosus and an interrupted aortic arch, immunodeficiency, and hypocalcemia. The patient is mosaic for two abnormal cell lines: a deletion [del(22)(q11.2q11.2)] found in 11 cells and a duplication [dup(22)(q11.2q11.2)] found in 9 cells. Molecular cytogenetic analysis in our patient revealed a 1.5 Mb deletion/duplication, the first duplication reported of this size. Deletion/duplication mosaicism, which is rare, has been reported in a number of cases involving many different chromosome segments. We present the clinical phenotype of our patient in comparison to the phenotypes seen in patients with the 22q11.2 deletion or duplication alone. We propose that this rearrangement arose by a mitotic event involving unequal crossover in an early mitotic division facilitated by LCRs.     

Aberrant interchromosomal exchanges are the predominant cause of the 22q11.2 deletion

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletions are found in almost 90% of patients with DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DGS/VCFS). Large, chromosome-specific low copy repeats (LCRs), flanking and within the deletion interval, are presumed to lead to misalignment and aberrant recombination in meiosis resulting in this frequent microdeletion syndrome. We traced the grandparental origin of regions flanking de novo 3 Mb deletions in 20 informative three-generation families. Haplotype reconstruction showed an unexpectedly high number of proximal interchromosomal exchanges between homologs, occurring in 19/20 families. Instead, the normal chromosome 22 in these probands showed interchromosomal exchanges in 2/15 informative meioses, a rate consistent with the genetic distance. Meiotic exchanges, visualized as MLH1 foci, localize to the distal long arm of chromosome 22 in 75% of human spermatocytes tested, also reflecting the genetic map. Additionally, we found no effect of proband gender or parental age on the crossover frequency. Parental origin studies in 65 de novo 3 Mb deletions (including these 20 patients) demonstrated no bias. Unlike Williams syndrome, we found no chromosomal inversions flanked by LCRs in 22 sets of parents of 22q11 deleted patients, or in eight non-deleted patients with a DGS/VCFS phenotype using FISH. Our data are consistent with significant aberrant interchromosomal exchange events during meiosis I in the proximal region of the affected chromosome 22 as the likely etiology for the deletion. This type of exchange occurs more often than is described for deletions of chromosomes 7q11, 15q11, 17p11 and 17q11, implying a difference in the meiotic behavior of chromosome 22.