Automated External Defibrillator Program Does Not Impair Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Initiation in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

Objectives: To evaluate whether automated external defibrillator (AED) training and AED availability affected the response of volunteer rescuers and performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in presumed out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OOH‐CA) during the multicenter Public Access Defibrillation Trial. Methods: The Public Access Defibrillation Trial recruited 1,260 facilities in 24 North American regional sites to participate in a trial addressing survival from OOH‐CA when AED training and availability were added to a volunteer‐based emergency response team. Volunteers at each facility were trained to perform either CPR alone (CPR) or CPR in conjunction with AED use (CPR+AED) according to randomized assignments. This study reports the frequency of response and initiation of CPR actions (chest compressions and/or ventilations) by volunteers in the CPR and CPR+AED study groups. Results: A total of 314 presumed OOH‐CA episodes occurred in CPR facilities, and 308 occurred in CPR+AED facilities. The volunteers were matched well for age, gender, and other features. Overall, ventilations (23.1% vs. 13.1%), chest compressions (24.4% vs. 12.1%), and both actions (19.8% vs. 10.5%; all p < 0.05) were more commonly performed in OOH‐CA cases in the CPR+AED group. However, when only OOH‐CA cases with volunteers responding were analyzed, the rates of CPR actions were similar. In the subgroup of CPR+AED cases with a responding volunteer, the AED was turned on for only 47% of cases. Volunteers initiated a CPR action more commonly when the AED was turned on (60.7% vs. 39.3%; p = 0.003). Conclusions: In the Public Access Defibrillation Trial, rates of CPR actions for presumed OOH‐CA victims were low but similar for CPR and CPR+AED responding volunteer rescuers. Factors associated with volunteer response, CPR action initiation, and AED activation warrant further investigation.     

The effect of time on CPR and automated external defibrillator skills in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

BACKGROUND: The time to skill deterioration between primary training/retraining and further retraining in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillation (AED) for lay-persons is unclear. The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial was a multi-center randomized controlled trial evaluating survival after CPR-only versus CPR+AED delivered by onsite non-medical volunteer responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. AIMS: This sub-study evaluated the relationship of time between primary training/retraining and further retraining on volunteer performance during pretest AED and CPR skill evaluation. METHODS: Volunteers at 1260 facilities in 24 North American regions underwent training/retraining according to facility randomization, which included an initial session and a refresher session at approximately 6 months. Before the next retraining, a CPR and AED skill test was completed for 2729 volunteers. Primary outcome for the study was assessment of global competence of CPR or AED performance (adequate versus not adequate) using chi(2)-test for trends by time interval (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Confirmatory (GEE) logistic regression analysis, adjusted for site and potential confounders was done. RESULTS: The proportion of volunteers judged to be competent did not diminish by interval (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) for either CPR or AED skills. After adjusting for site and potential confounders, longer intervals to further retraining was associated with a slightly lower likelihood of performing adequate CPR but not with AED scores. CONCLUSIONS: After primary training/retraining, the CPR skills of targeted lay responders deteriorate nominally but 80% remain competent up to 1 year. AED skills do not deteriorate significantly and 90% of volunteers remain competent up to 1 year.     

Adverse events associated with lay emergency response programs: the public access defibrillation trial experience

The adverse event (AE) profile of lay volunteer CPR and public access defibrillation (PAD) programs is unknown. We undertook to investigate the frequency, severity, and type of AE's occurring in widespread PAD implementation. DESIGN: A randomized-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: One thousand two hundred and sixty public and residential facilities in the US and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: On-site, volunteer, lay personnel trained in CPR only compared to CPR plus automated external defibrillators (AEDs). INTERVENTION: Persons experiencing possible cardiac arrest receiving lay volunteer first response with CPR+AED compared with CPR alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An AE is defined as an event of significance that caused, or had the potential to cause, harm to a patient or volunteer, or a criminal act. AE data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Twenty thousand three hundred and ninety six lay volunteers were trained in either CPR or CPR+AED. One thousand seven hundred and sixteen AEDs were placed in units randomized to the AED arm. There were 26,389 exposure months. Only 36 AE's were reported. There were two patient-related AEs: both patients experienced rib fractures. There were seven volunteer-related AE's: one had a muscle pull, four experienced significant emotional distress and two reported pressure by their employee to participate. There were 27 AED-related AEs: 17 episodes of theft involving 20 devices, three involved AEDs that were placed in locations inaccessible to the volunteer, four AEDs had mechanical problems not affecting patient safety, and three devices were improperly maintained by the facility. There were no inappropriate shocks and no failures to shock when indicated (95% upper bound for probability of inappropriate shock or failure to shock = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: AED use following widespread training of lay-persons in CPR and AED is generally safe for the volunteer and the patient. Lay volunteers may report significant, usually transient, emotional stress following response to a potential cardiac arrest. Within the context of this prospective, randomized multi-center study, AEDs have an exceptionally high safety profile when used by trained lay responders.     

How Well are Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Skills Retained over Time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial

Background: The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four‐hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. Objectives: To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. Methods: This was an observational follow‐up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N= 2,426) or CPR+AED (N= 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one‐on‐one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). Results: For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p < 0.001, chi‐square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p < 0.001). The mean (± standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (± 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (± 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Conclusions: Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.     

Public defibrillation: increased survival from a structured response system

The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed to compare the number of persons surviving to hospital discharge after experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) among "community units" randomized to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) only or CPR plus an automated external defibrillator (AED). In 24 centers across the United States and Canada, 993 community units, composed of 1260 individual facilities, trained more than 19,000 layperson responders in CPR-only or CPR+AED. Survival to hospital discharge in the CPR+AED arm was double that of the CPR-only arm (30 vs 15, P = .03; RR = 2.0, 95% CI [1.07-3.77]). Intense focus on facility infrastructure, including responder recruitment and training, communication, evaluation, and oversight, was necessary for implementing the emergency response systems for the trial. Use of an AED within this structured response system can increase the number of survivors to hospital discharge after OOH-CA. Trained nonmedical responders can use AEDs safely and effectively.     

Location of Cardiac Arrests in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

Background. The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial found an overall doubling in the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) survivors when a lay responder team was equipped with an automated external defibrillator (AED), compared with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone. Objectives. To describe the types of facilities that participated in the trial andto report the incidence of CA andsurvival in these different types of facilities. Methods. In this post-hoc analysis of PAD Trial data, the physical characteristics of the participating facilities andthe numbers of presumed CAs, treatable CAs, andsurvivors are reported for each category of facilities. Results. There were 625 presumed CAs at 1,260 participating facilities. Just under half (n = 291) of the presumed CAs were classified as treatable CAs. Treatable CAs occurred at a rate of 2.9 per 1,000 person-years of exposure; rates were highest in fitness centers (5.1) andgolf courses (4.8) andlowest in office complexes (0.7) andhotels (0.7). Survival from treatable CA was highest in recreational complexes (0.5), public transportation sites (0.4), andfitness centers (0.4) andlowest in office complexes (0.1) andresidential facilities (0.0). Conclusions. During the PAD Trial, the exposure-adjusted rate of treatable CA was highest in fitness centers andgolf courses, but the incidence per facility was low to moderate. Survival from treatable cardiac arrest was highest in recreational complexes, public transportation facilities, andfitness centers.     

A prospective infant manikin-based observational study of telephone-cardiopulmonary resuscitation

INTRODUCTION: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to significantly improve outcome in sudden cardiac arrest in children. In view of this, most emergency medicine services deliver telephone instructions for carrying out CPR to laypeople who call the emergency services. Little is known as to whether laypeople carrying out these instructions deliver effective CPR. METHODS: Adult volunteers who had no previous experience of CPR were recruited. They were presented with a scenario and asked to perform CPR for 3 min on a training manikin according to the instructions they were given by telephone. Tidal volume, compression rate and depth, time to the beginning of CPR and hand positioning were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-five volunteers were recruited; three were excluded (two had previous CPR training and one refused to perform CPR). None of the subjects identified correctly that the manikin was not breathing and achieved a level of CPR performance that was consistent with all of the current guidelines. Median tidal volume of rescue breaths was 38 mL. Only 23% of subjects delivered rescue breaths of optimal volume (40-50 mL) and 23% delivered no effective breaths at all. Chest compressions were performed at a median rate of 95 min(-1) with 37% delivering compressions at the optimum rate of 90-110 min(-1). CONCLUSION: None of our volunteers performed telephone-CPR at a level consistent with current guidelines. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether the instructions can be improved to optimise CPR performance.     

A correlational study on health training program participation and influences upon communities volunteers in Taipei City

This is a cross-sectional study that purposely selected healthy community centers (HCC) in Taipei City to explore factors affecting volunteers' health training program participation (HTPP). The major objectives were to: (1) examine volunteer's HTPP; (2) explore relationships among volunteers' HTPP, self-efficacy (SE) in healthy community building, and community activities participation (CAP); and (3) identify key factors affecting volunteers' HTPP. A self-developed instrument with validity (content validity index > .91) and reliability (alpha = .63-.87) was used. A total of 250 participants were recruited. Study results revealed that a majority of the volunteers were middle-aged women who held at least a high school education, worked part-time, held Buddhist religious beliefs, were married and were middle class in terms of income. The average HTPP value was 19, with Xin Yi, Zhong Zhen and Bei Tou HCCs exhibiting higher HTPP values. Those not currently employed and housewives volunteers had lower HTPP values. 66.4% of volunteers participated at community activities after training and contributed 60-120 service hours a year. Volunteers' SE in healthy community building was low (M = 2.01, SD = 1.01), which, however, could explain 21% variance of HTPP. Factors affecting HTPP included HCC site, SE and CAP, which accounted for 57% of variance. Study results indicated that SE and CAP could serve as training evaluation indicators and a well-organized training program could increase volunteers' SE. Standard health training programs should incorporate three programs, including volunteerism perception, health promotion, and middle aged and elderly care to thus further improve volunteers' participation in community health activities.     

Evaluating Barriers to Bystander CPR among Laypersons before and after Compression-only CPR Training

Objective: Bystander CPR is an essential part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. EMS and public safety jurisdictions have embraced initiatives to teach compression-only CPR to laypersons in order to increase rates of bystander CPR. We examined barriers to bystander CPR amongst laypersons participating in community compression-only CPR training and the ability of the training to alleviate these barriers. The barriers analyzed include fear of litigation, risk of disease transmission, fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR when unnecessary, and fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR incorrectly. Methods: Laypersons attending community compression-only CPR training were administered surveys before and after community CPR training. Data were analyzed via standard statistical analyses. Results: A total of 238 surveys were collected and analyzed between September 2015 and January 2016. The most common reported motivation for attending CPR training was “to be prepared/just in case” followed by “infant or child at home.” Respondents reported that they were significantly more likely to perform CPR on a family member than a stranger in both pre-and post-training responses. Nevertheless, reported self-confidence in and likelihood of doing CPR on both family and strangers increased from pre-training to post-training. There was a statistically significant decrease in reported likelihood of all four barriers to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR when pre-training responses were compared to post-training responses. Previous CPR training and history of having witnessed a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) were both associated with decreased barriers to CPR, but previous training had no effect on reported likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR. Conclusion: The training initiative studied significantly reduced the reported likelihood of all barriers studied to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR and also increased the reported confidence in doing CPR and likelihood of doing CPR on both strangers and family. However, it did not alleviate the pre-training discrepancy between likelihood of performing CPR on strangers versus family. Previous CPR training or certification had no impact on likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR.     

Community attitudes towards performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Western Australia.

OBJECTIVE: to determine the attitudes of the Western Australian community towards performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the factors affecting these attitudes. METHODS: telephone survey of a randomly selected sample of people from suburban Perth and rural Western Australia; practical assessment of a sub-sample of volunteers from those surveyed, to correlate survey answers with practical skills. RESULTS: of 803 people surveyed, the majority (90.7%) definitely would give mouth-to-mouth ventilation to a friend or relative, but less than half (47.2%) would to a stranger. The reluctance was mostly (56%) because of health and safety concerns, particularly related to HIV infection. Higher percentages of people would definitely provide cardiac massage for a friend or relative (91.4%) or stranger (78.1%). People were more likely to give mouth-to-mouth and cardiac massage if they had been trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), trained several times, trained recently, and used their CPR skills in real life. There were no significant differences between city and country people in whether they would provide CPR, but older people were less willing to provide mouth-to-mouth or cardiac massage. On practical assessment of 100 volunteers, there were significant errors and omissions in airway assessment, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation and cardiac massage. Volunteers with better practical scores were more prepared to provide CPR. DISCUSSION: our results indicate a significant reluctance of the Western Australia public to perform mouth-to-mouth, except to a friend or relative. Earlier CPR training, practice and use seemed to diminish this reluctance. Practical CPR skills were not well executed. Those with better skills were less reluctant to use them. We recommend increasing CPR training in the community, greater frequency of refresher courses and public education on the risks of CPR to improve rates of bystander CPR.     

Emergencies in the school setting: are public school teachers adequately trained to respond?

INTRODUCTION: This study attempted to determine the extent of training and emergency care knowledge of public school teachers in midwestern states. A secondary purpose was to assess the frequency of injury and illness in the school setting requiring the teacher to first-respond. METHOD: A questionnaire and 14-item, scenario-based, emergency medical care test was developed and pretested. A discrimination index was used for validation of the instrument and a reliability coefficient of .82 was computed using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20. A randomly recruited group of public school nurses from Arkansas, Kansas, and Missouri administered the instrument to 334 teachers who had no prior knowledge of the test. A random telephone survey of local school patrons also was completed to determine parental assumptions and expectations for emergency care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in teachers. RESULTS: One-third (112 teachers) had no specific training in first-aid and 40% never had been trained in CPR. However, most (87%) of the respondents strongly agreed that emergency care training should be required in teacher preparation programs. Eighteen percent of the teachers responded to more than 20 injured or ill students annually, and 17% reported that they had encountered at least one life-threatening emergency in a student during their career. The average score for all respondents on the emergency care test was 58% (chi 2 = 8.12 +/- 2.42). Those with prior first-aid training averaged 60.5% (chi 2 = 8.47 +/- 2.32). Significant deficiencies were noted for recognition and appropriate treatment of student emergencies involving basic life support (BLS) and airway interventions, diabetic emergencies, and treatment of profuse bleeding. Forty of the 50 (80%) parents surveyed assumed that all teachers were adequately trained in first-aid and CPR. CONCLUSION: Public school teachers represent a potentially effective first-response component during disasters and isolated emergencies in the school environment. Overall, most of public school teachers in this study were deficient in both training and knowledge of emergency care and BLS modalities. Lack of effective, formal emergency care training in teacher preparation programs coupled with no continuing education requirement is a possible explanation of these results. Emergency medical services providers should seek opportunities to help with first-responder training and continuing education in their schools.     

Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London

INTRODUCTION: The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction ("heart attack"), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low. AIMS: To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; investigate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates; assess levels of training and attitudes towards CPR, and explore the types of interventions considered useful for increasing rates of bystander CPR among Greater London residents. METHODS: A quantitative interview survey was conducted with 1011 Greater London residents. Eight focus groups were also conducted to explore a range of issues in greater depth and validate trends that emerged in the initial survey. RESULTS: Chest pain was the most commonly recognised symptom of "heart attack". Around half of the respondents were aware that a myocardial infarction differs from a cardiac arrest, although their ability to explain this difference was limited. The majority overestimated that at least a quarter of cardiac arrest patients in London survive to hospital discharge. Few participants had received CPR training, and most were hesitant about performing the procedure on a stranger. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness and knowledge of CPR, and reactions to cardiac emergencies, reflect relatively low levels of CPR training in London. Publicising cardiac arrest survival figures may be instrumental in prompting members of the public to train in CPR and motivating those who have been trained to intervene in a cardiac emergency.     

Comfort level of emergency medical service providers in responding to weapons of mass destruction events: impact of training and equipment

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have suggested that emergency medical services (EMS) providers are ill-prepared in the areas of training and equipment for response to events due to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and other public health emergencies (epidemics, etc.). METHODS: A nationally representative sample of basic and paramedic EMS providers in the United States was surveyed to assess whether they had received training in WMD and/or public health emergencies as part of their initial provider training and as continuing medical education within the past 24 months. Providers also were surveyed as to whether their primary EMS agency had the necessary specialty equipment to respond to these specific events. RESULTS: More than half of EMS providers had some training in WMD response. Hands-on training was associated with EMS provider comfort in responding to chemical, biological, and/or radiological events and public health emergencies (odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 3.3). Only 18.1% of providers surveyed indicated that their agencies had the necessary equipment to respond to a WMD event. Emergency medical service providers who only received WMD training reported higher comfort levels than those who had equipment, but no training. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of training and education as well as the lack of necessary equipment to respond to WMD events is associated with decreased comfort among emergency medical services providers in responding to chemical, biological, and/or radiological incidents. Better training and access to appropriate equipment may increase provider comfort in responding to these types of incidents.     

Simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: initial events and response times of a hospital arrest team

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training programs exist to enhance knowledge and skills retention. However, they do not ensure that effective CPR will be performed by trainees or resuscitation teams. One aspect of CPR effectiveness is the ability of the team to respond to an emergency call in a timely manner. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the time required for team members to respond to an emergency call and to initiate definitive treatment in our pediatric facility. The medical staff who responded had no prior knowledge of the simulated cardiac arrest (SCA) events. All events were recorded on audio-cassette tape to determine the sequence of events and response time of arrest team members. SCA scenarios represented examples of cardiac, hematologic, renal, respiratory, and pharmacologic pathophysiology. All participants were instructed to respond as though the SCA were an actual emergency. RESULTS: From December 1991 to January 1993, 37 SCAs were evaluated. Documentation began after a concise arrest scenario had been presented to a designated nursing representative who was to be the first rescuer on the scene. The rescuer first assessed the patient's condition, activated the cardiac arrest system (median elapsed time, MET, 0.50 minutes), and then initiated single-person CPR (MET 0.58 minutes). Administration of oxygen occurred at an MET of 2.25 minutes. The first member of the arrest team to respond was the pediatric resident (MET 3.17 minutes) followed by the respiratory therapist (MET 3.20 minutes), an ICU nurse (MET 3.58 minutes), a pharmacist (MET 3.42 minutes), and anesthesiology personnel (MET 4.70 minutes). DISCUSSION: The use of SCAs (termed "Mega Code") serves as an extension of Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support education and provides a valuable learning experience and quality assurance tool. Limitations that might influence patient outcome during an actual in-hospital arrest have led to refinements in our cardiac arrest procedures. Of particular note was the delay in oxygen administration, which may be linked to its omission from the 1986 and 1992 American Heart Association Basic Life Support Guidelines. CONCLUSION: We believe that BLS education for hospital employees should include and emphasize oxygen delivery for resuscitation.     

Measuring survival rates from sudden cardiac arrest: the elusive definition

BACKGROUND: Measuring survival from sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) is often used as a benchmark of the quality of a community's emergency medical service (EMS) system. The definition of OOH-CA survival rates depends both upon the numerator (surviving cases) and the denominator (all cases). PURPOSE: The purpose of the public access defibrillation (PAD) trial was to measure the impact on survival of adding an automated external defibrillator (AED) to a volunteer response system trained in CPR. This paper reports the definition of OOH-CA developed by the PAD trial investigators, and it evaluates alternative statistical methods used to assess differences in reported "survival." METHODS: Case surveillance was limited to the prospectively determined geographic boundaries of the participating trial units. The numerator in calculating a survival rate should include only those patients who survived an event but who otherwise would have died except for the application of some facet of emergency medical care-in this trial a defibrillatory shock. Among denominators considered were: total population of the study unit, all deaths within the study unit, and documented ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests. The PAD classification focused upon cases that might have benefited from the early use of an AED, in addition to the likely benefit from early recognition of OOH-CA, early access of EMS, and early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Results of this classification system were used to evaluate the impact of the PAD definition on the distribution of cardiac arrest case types between CPR only and CPR + AED units. RESULTS: Potential OOH-CA episodes were classified into one of four groups: definite, probable, uncertain, or not an OOH-CA. About half of cardiac arrests in the PAD units were judged to be definite OOH-CA events and therefore potentially treatable with an AED. However, events that occurred in CPR-only units were less likely to be classified as definite or probable OOH-CA events than those in CPR + AED units (43% versus 55%, odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.57-1.07). The study retained sufficient power to permit a statistical analysis of the alternative hypothesis that the CPR + AED method results in twice as many survivors as a CPR-only approach. The result is critically dependent on the denominator used for calculating survival rates; but the analysis does not require a denominator as the numerators will have identical Poisson distributions (counts for rare events) under the null hypothesis since randomization distributes the risk of cardiac arrest evenly between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Reported OOH-CA rates and survival rates vary widely, depending upon the definitions applied to events. Rigorous assessment of treatments applied to improve survival can be obscured by inappropriate definitions. Large-scale randomized interventions designed to improve survival from OOH-CA can be evaluated based upon the absolute numbers of patients surviving, rather than a change in the proportion surviving.     

Subject Index

INTRODUCTION: Public access defibrillation (PAD) has shown potential to increase cardiac arrest survival rates. OBJECTIVES: To describe the geographic epidemiology of prehospital cardiac arrest in Singapore using geographic information systems (GIS) technology and assess the potential for deployment of a PAD program. METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective study looking at the geographic location of pre-hospital cardiac arrests in Singapore. Included were all patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presented to emergency departments. Patient characteristics, cardiac arrest circumstances, emergency medical service (EMS) response and outcomes were recorded according to the Utstein style. Location of cardiac arrests was spot-mapped using GIS. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, 2428 patients were enrolled into the study. Mean age for arrests was 60.6 years with 68.0% male. 67.8% of arrests occurred in residences, with 54.5% bystander witnessed and another 10.5% EMS witnessed. Mean EMS response time was 9.6 min with 21.7% receiving prehospital defibrillation. Cardiac arrest occurrence was highest in the suburban town centers in the Eastern and Southern part of the country. We also identified communities with the highest arrest rates. About twice as many arrests occurred during the day (07:00-18:59 h) compared to night (19:00-06:59 h). The categories with the highest frequencies of occurrence included residential areas, in vehicles, healthcare facilities, along roads, shopping areas and offices/industrial areas. CONCLUSION: We found a definite geographical distribution pattern of cardiac arrest. This study demonstrates the utility of GIS with a national cardiac arrest database and has implications for implementing a PAD program, targeted CPR training, AED placement and ambulance deployment.     

The role of volunteers in hospice bereavement support in New Zealand

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of hospice bereavement volunteers in New Zealand. Participants included 34 co-ordinators and 121 volunteers from 26 hospices. Co-ordinators and volunteers were asked about the perceived adequacy of their training, support and deployment. Findings revealed that most volunteers were recruited through personal contact and newspapers. They reported being strongly motivated to help others (88%) and most had previous bereavements (71%). Volunteers provided a wide range of bereavement support within the home and/or hospice. They listed twice as many 'satisfying' compared to 'least satisfying' (442 vs 207) aspects of their work, although 50% reported their work to be emotionally distressing and 28% had problems with 'boundaries'. Two-thirds had generic volunteer training, but only a third had specific training in bereavement. Volunteers appeared to be largely unaware of the need for specialist training, or supervision, which raises issues about the quality of services provided.     

规范化培训对全运会医疗志愿者心肺复苏质量的作用

目的 通过与同期本地区三级医院急诊医务人员复苏操作质量对照,评价规范化急救技能训练对泰安地区全运会医疗志愿者心肺复苏操作质量的作用.方法 随机检测本地区连续参加规范化心肺复苏技术培训3个月56名医疗志愿者(规范化培训组)的心肺复苏操作质量,并与同期泰安市三级医院急诊科近1 a内未参加规范化心肺复苏培训62名医务人员(对照组)的复苏操作质量进行对照.结果 志愿者完成心肺复苏技术操作质量明显优于对照组,总合格率分别为83.2%和33.1%,志愿者按压幅度、按压频率、按压间释放压力合格率高于对照组(87.65%、89.3%、94.6% vs 41.9%、48.4%、67.7%,P<0.01);整个操作时间差异无统计学意义[(118.3±18.2) s vs (116.1±5.1) s,P>0.05];单组通气时间明显短于对照组[(6.48±1.2) vs (7.49±1.5),P<0.01];每分钟实际按压次数差异无统计学意义[(77.3±3.6) vs (77.8±2.1),P>0.05);按压/通气时间比分别为(2.6∶1 vs 2.1∶1).Logistic回归分析结果显示心肺复苏操作质量与按压手法、按压姿势及反复规范化培训明显相关,分别为[OR 13.46,95%CI (2.32～71.3); OR 31.81,95%CI (3.60～263.4);OR 4.17,95%CI (1.17～14.2)].结论 经反复规范培训的医疗志愿者心肺复苏操作质量明显优于未经培训的医护人员,规范化培训有助于提高CPR操作质量.