Definitive Radiotherapy for Inoperable Stage IIB Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: Patterns of Care and Comparative Effectiveness

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to analyze practice patterns and perform comparative effectiveness of definitive radiotherapy techniques for inoperable stage IIB (American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsAdults in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with T3N0M0 or T1-2N1M0 NCSLC between 2004 and 2015 who received definitive radiotherapy were identified. Cases were divided as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stratified by systemic therapy (ST). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the effect of covariates on overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis by tumor size, chest wall invasion, multifocality, and ST use was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS.ResultsA total of 10,081 subjects met inclusion criteria: 4401 T3N0M0 (66.5% CFRT, 11.0% HFRT, and 22.5% SBRT) and 5680 T1-2N1M0 (92.5% CFRT and 7.5% HFRT). For T3N0M0 NSCLC, SBRT utilization increased from 3.7% in 2006% to 35.4% in 2015. Subjects treated with SBRT were more likely to have smaller tumors, multifocal tumors, or adenocarcinoma histology. SBRT resulted in similar or superior OS compared with CFRT for tumors > 5 cm, tumors invading the chest wall, or multifocal tumors. SBRT was significantly associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.715; P < .001). For T1-2N1M0 NSCLC, patients treated with HFRT were significantly older and less likely to receive ST; nevertheless, there was no difference in OS between HFRT and CFRT on multivariate analysis.ConclusionCFRT + ST is utilized most frequently to treat stage IIB NSCLC in the United States when surgery is not performed, though it is decreasing. SBRT utilization for T3N0M0 NSCLC is increasing and was associated with improved OS.     

Outcomes Following SBRT vs. IMRT and 3DCRT for Older Patients with Stage IIA Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer > 5 cm

BackgroundTo describe outcomes and compare the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage IIA lymph node-negative (N0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors > 5 cm.MethodsWe used the SEER-Medicare database (2005-2015) to identify patients > 65 years with stage IIA (AJCC TNM7) N0 NSCLC > 5 cm tumors who were treated with SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT. We used propensity score methods with inverse probability weighting to compare lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.ResultsOf 584 patients, 88 (15%), 140 (24%), and 356 (61%) underwent SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT, respectively. The SBRT group was older (P = .004), had more comorbidities (P = .02), smaller tumors (P = .03), and more adenocarcinomas (P < .0001). We found a trend towards higher median unadjusted OS with SBRT compared to IMRT and 3DCRT (19 vs. 13 and 14 months, respectively, P = .37). In our propensity score-adjusted analyses, SBRT was significantly associated with better OS and LCSS compared to IMRT (HR_OS: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89, HR_LCSS: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.81) and 3DCRT (HR_OS: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, HR_LCSS: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93). SBRT-treated patients also had lower overall adjusted complication rates compared to IMRT (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and 3DCRT (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71).ConclusionFor patients with NSCLC tumors > 5 cm, SBRT trends towards fewer toxicities and improved survival compared to other forms of radiotherapy. Our findings support SBRT as an appropriate treatment strategy for older patients with larger inoperable NSCLC tumors.     

Canadian Phase III Randomized Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventionally Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Stage I,Medically Inoperable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer – Rationale and Protocol Design for the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)-LUSTRE Trial

We describe a Canadian phase III randomized controlled trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus conventionally hypofractionated radiotherapy (CRT) for the treatment of stage I medically inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer (OCOG-LUSTRE Trial).Eligible patients are randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions for peripherally located lesions; 60 Gy in 8 fractions for centrally located lesions) or CRT (60 Gy in 15 fractions). The primary outcome of the study is 3-year local control, which we hypothesize will improve from 75% with CRT to 87.5% with SBRT. With 85% power to detect a difference of this magnitude (hazard ratio = 0.46), a 2-sided α = 0.05 and a 2:1 randomization, we require a sample size of 324 patients (216 SBRT, 108 CRT). Important secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease-free survival, toxicity, radiation-related treatment death, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. A robust radiation therapy quality assurance program has been established to assure consistent and high quality SBRT and CRT delivery.Despite widespread interest and adoption of SBRT, there still remains a concern regarding long-term control and risks of toxicity (particularly in patients with centrally located lesions). The OCOG-LUSTRE study is the only randomized phase III trial testing SBRT in a medically inoperable population, and the results of this trial will attempt to prove that the benefits of SBRT outweigh the potential risks.     

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundThe optimal treatment of stage I non–small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.ResultsA total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non–small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionResults of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non–small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy in various head and neck cancers: Comparing photons, carbon-ions and protons

Purpose

To synthesize and compare available evidence considering the effectiveness of carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed to retrieve evidence on tumor control, survival and late treatment toxicity for carbon-ion, proton and the best available photon radiotherapy.

Results

In total 86 observational studies (74 photon, 5 carbon-ion and 7 proton) and eight comparative in-silico studies were included. For mucosal malignant melanomas, 5-year survival was significantly higher after carbon-ion therapy compared to conventional photon therapy (44% versus 25%; P-value 0.007). Also, 5-year local control after proton therapy was significantly higher for paranasal and sinonasal cancer compared to intensity modulated photon therapy (88% versus 66%; P-value 0.035). No other statistically significant differences were observed. Although poorly reported, toxicity tended to be less frequent in carbon-ion and proton studies compared to photons.In-silico studies showed a lower dose to the organs at risk, independently of the tumor site.

Conclusions

For carbon-ion therapy, the increased survival in mucosal malignant melanomas might suggest an advantage in treating relatively radio-resistant tumors. Except for paranasal and sinonasal cancer, survival and tumor control for proton therapy were generally similar to the best available photon radiotherapy. In agreement with included in-silico studies, limited available clinical data indicates that toxicity tends to be lower for proton compared to photon radiotherapy.Since the overall quantity and quality of data regarding carbon-ion and proton therapy is poor, we recommend the construction of an international particle therapy register to facilitate definitive comparisons.     

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy as an Alternative to Lobectomy in Patients With Medically Operable Stage I NSCLC: A Retrospective,Multicenter Analysis

Background

Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SBRT) has evolved as the standard treatment for patients with inoperable stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of a retrospective analysis conducted on a large, well-controlled cohort of patients with stage I to II NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (LOB) or SBRT.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of histologically proven inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Patterns of failure

Background and purpose

To report patterns of failure of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in inoperable patients with histologically confirmed stage I NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Ninety-two inoperable patients (median age: 75 years) with clinically staged, histologically proven T1 (n = 31) or T2 (n = 61), N0, M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included in this study. Treatment consisted of 3-5 fractions with 7-15 Gy per fraction prescribed to the 60% isodose.

Results

Freedom from local recurrence at 1, 3 and 5 years was 89%, 83% and 83%, respectively. All 10 local failures were observed in patients with T2 tumors. Isolated regional recurrence was observed in 7.6%. The crude rate of distant progression was 20.7%. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 79%, 38% and 17% with a median survival of 29 months. Disease specific survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93%, 64% and 48%. Karnofsky performance status, T stage, gross tumor volume and tumor location had no significant impact on overall and disease specific survival. SBRT was generally well tolerated and all patients completed therapy as planned.

Conclusion

SBRT for stage I lung cancer is very well tolerated in this patient cohort with significant cardiopulmonal comorbidity and results in excellent local control rates, although a considerable portion develops regional and distant metastases.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy following SBRT for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in older patients

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer and tumors ≥four cm. Here, we aim to evaluate its role following SBRT in older patients. Patients >70 years diagnosed with clinical stages I-II NSCLC, (N0 disease), who received SBRT, were identified using the National Cancer Database (n = 7042). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, and the log-rank test was used to compare distributions by treatment strategy overall and within clinical stages I and II. There were 3533 female patients (50.2%), and 6074 (86.3%) had stage I disease. Among stage I patients, 643 (10.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to 372 stage II patients (38.4%). Median OS was better with SBRT in patients with stage I disease (25.4 vs. 20.3 months; p < .001); while patients with stage II NSCLC had better OS with SBRT + chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 14.2 months; p < .001). On multivariate analysis, patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT alone had better overall survival (HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73, 0.87). SBRT alone was associated with an increased risk of death in patients with stage II disease (HR: 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15, 1.55). Patients with tumors ≥4 cm had better OS with SBRT + chemotherapy (18.5 vs. 15.5 months; p = .003), while patients with tumors <4 cm did better with SBRT (median OS of 24.1 vs. 20.3 months; p < .001). In >70 years old patients with tumors ≥4 cm, adjuvant chemotherapy following SBRT was associated with improved OS.     

Incidental Mediastinal Dose Does Not Explain Low Mediastinal Node Recurrence Rates in Patients With Early-Stage NSCLC Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

BackgroundPatients with stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) do not undergo a staging mediastinoscopy, yet reported mediastinal recurrence rates appear lower than in patients undergoing surgical resection. We determined incidental SBRT doses to assess whether this could account for the low rates of recurrence.Patients and MethodsBetween March 2009 and September 2012, we reviewed cases of patients with inoperable lung tumors (n = 136) treated with SBRT at our institution. The SBRT regimen was 54 Gy in 3 fractions with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) staging. Incidental doses to the mediastinal lymph node stations (MLNSs), primary tumor control, locoregional (LR), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) rates were determined.ResultsForty-six patients with stage I NSCLC met the inclusion criteria. The calculated median incidental SBRT dose to all MLNSs was < 5 Gy for the majority of patients (75%). At a median follow-up of 16.8 months (0.6-38.9 months), the 1- and 2-year primary tumor control, LR, OS, and DC rates were 100% and 95.5%, 97.4% and 81.7%, 88.1% and 81%, and 96.9% and 86.9%, respectively. Only 2 patients (4.9%) had mediastinal recurrence, with incidental SBRT doses to MLNSs that were similar to the rest of patients (P > .05).ConclusionLow mediastinal recurrence rates in stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT validates the omission of staging mediastinoscopy. The low incidental dose to MLNSs does not seem to explain the low mediastinal recurrence in the majority of patients. Our findings also confirm that prophylactic radiation to the mediastinum is not necessary and support the hypothesis that local ablation of the primary lesion could indirectly affect subclinical nodal disease through unknown mechanisms.     

Survival After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Diagnosed or Biopsy-Proven Early-Stage NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It is unclear if survival outcomes for SBRT are influenced by a lack of pathological confirmation of malignancy and staging of disease in these patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess survival outcomes after SBRT in studies with patients with clinically diagnosed versus biopsy-proven early-stage NSCLC.

A phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Background and purposeThe outcome of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with conventional radiotherapy is inferior to that of patients treated surgically. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of stage I NSCLC.Materials and methodsWe performed SBRT for 31 stage I NSCLC patients. Of these, 20 were medically inoperable, and 11 refused surgery. Nineteen tumours were T1-stage masses, and 12 tumours were T2. Median tumour size was 25 mm. SBRT was administered as 45 Gy/3 fractions; however, when the tumour was close to an organ at risk, 60 Gy/8 fractions were used. These doses were prescribed at the centre of the tumours.ResultsThe median duration of observation for all patients was 32 months (range, 4–87 months). In 9 of the 31 cases, local recurrence was observed. The 3-year local control rates of T1 and T2 tumours were 77.9% and 40.0%, respectively. The 3-year overall and cause-specific survival rates were 71.7% and 83.5%, respectively. Although the symptoms improved with medical treatment, 5 patients developed acute pulmonary toxicity ⩾grade 2.ConclusionsSBRT is safe and effective for stage I NSCLC patients. However, a more intensive treatment regimen should be considered for T2 tumours.     

Matched-pair comparisons of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus surgery for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

A population-based matched-pair comparison was performed to compare the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

All the eligible studies were searched by PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC).

Results

Six studies containing 864 matched patients were included in the meta-analysis. The surgery was associated with a better long-term OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The pooled OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1-year, 3-year OS were 1.31 [0.90, 1.91] and 1.82 [1.38, 2.40], respectively. However, the difference in 1-year and 3-year CSS, DFS, LC and DC was not significant.

Conclusions

This systematic review found a superior 3-year OS after surgery compared with SBRT, which supports the need to compare both treatments in large prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials.     

Prognostic Factors in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Aim: The objective of this study is to investigate prognostic factors affecting survival of patients undergoing concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCL). Methods and materials: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 148 patients with advanced, inoperable stage III NSCLC, who were treated between 2007 and 2015. Results: The median survival was found to be 19 months and 3-year overall survival was 27%. Age (CRT, performance status, induction/consolidation chemotherapy and presence of comorbidities did not affect survival (p>0.050). Conclusion: Young age, stage IIIA, radiotherapy dose and concurrent chemoradiotherapy may positively affect survival in stage III NSCL cases.     

Association of Operability With Post-Treatment Mortality in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundOperability is both a crucial determinant in treatment selection and a potential confounder in analyses comparing surgery with non-surgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We aimed to assess the association between operability status and intervention with post-treatment mortality in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsWe defined four groups of patients with cT1-T2N0M0 NSCLC diagnosed 2010 to 2014 from the National Cancer Database: SBRT patients deemed operable vs. inoperable and surgery patients receiving open vs. minimally-invasive approaches. Mortality rates at 30, 60, and 90 days post-treatment were calculated and compared.ResultsWe abstracted 80,108 patients, 0.8% undergoing SBRT and operable, 13.2% undergoing SBRT and inoperable, 52.4% undergoing open surgery, and 33.7% undergoing minimally-invasive surgery. Mortality rates were highest among open surgery patients and lowest among operable SBRT patients (2.0% vs. 0.2% at 30 days and 3.7% vs. 0.7% at 90 days), with intermediate results in the other two groups. These findings persisted on multivariate Cox regression: compared to patients undergoing minimally-invasive surgery, mortality risk was highest among open surgery patients (30 days HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.16-1.51; 90 days HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.24-1.50; both P < .001) and lowest among operable SBRT patients (30 days HR 0.09, 95%CI 0.01-0.64; 90 days HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.46; both P ≤ .016). These associations were maintained in a propensity score-matched subset.ConclusionOperable patients undergoing SBRT experience minimal post-treatment mortality compared to their inoperable counterparts. These findings illustrate the potential for confounding by operability to bias results in cohort studies that compare surgical vs. non-surgical approaches in early-stage NSCLC.     

A phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The outcome of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with conventional radiotherapy is inferior to that of patients treated surgically. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of stage I NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed SBRT for 31 stage I NSCLC patients. Of these, 20 were medically inoperable, and 11 refused surgery. Nineteen tumours were T1-stage masses, and 12 tumours were T2. Median tumour size was 25 mm. SBRT was administered as 45 Gy/3 fractions; however, when the tumour was close to an organ at risk, 60 Gy/8 fractions were used. These doses were prescribed at the centre of the tumours. RESULTS: The median duration of observation for all patients was 32 months (range, 4-87 months). In 9 of the 31 cases, local recurrence was observed. The 3-year local control rates of T1 and T2 tumours were 77.9% and 40.0%, respectively. The 3-year overall and cause-specific survival rates were 71.7% and 83.5%, respectively. Although the symptoms improved with medical treatment, 5 patients developed acute pulmonary toxicity > or =grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and effective for stage I NSCLC patients. However, a more intensive treatment regimen should be considered for T2 tumours.     

A Phase 1 Trial of Concurrent or Sequential Ipilimumab,Nivolumab, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage IV NSCLC Study

IntroductionPrevious studies have evaluated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic patients with NSCLC, including multimodality treatment with anti–programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Questions remain regarding the timing of SBRT and immunotherapy, safety with dual checkpoint blockade, and the utility in widely metastatic patients. This randomized phase 1 trial combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with sequential or concurrent multisite SBRT in patients with stage IV NSCLC to evaluate safety and obtain preliminary activity data.MethodsTreatment-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to concurrent (SBRT with immunotherapy) or sequential (SBRT followed by immunotherapy) treatment. A maximum of four treatment fields received SBRT. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were continued until clinical progression, development of toxicity, or after 2 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity to the relevant organ system attributed to SBRT and immunotherapy occuring within 3 months.ResultsA total of 37 patients were assessable. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the concurrent cohort (n = 18). The sequential cohort required a dose reduction in the central lung group owing to two grade 4 pneumonitis events (2 of 19). Overall best response was as follows: 5.4% (2 of 37) complete response, 40.5% (15 of 37) partial response, 16.2% (6 of 37) stable disease, and 37.8% (14 of 37) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6–11.4 mo), with median follow-up of 17.0 months. Median overall survival was not reached.ConclusionsConcurrent nivolumab, ipilimumab, and SBRT were not more toxic than sequential therapy, and multisite SBRT was well tolerated in widely metastatic patients. Multimodality therapy resulted in durable metastasis control and encouraging early overall survival.     

Co-morbidity index predicts for mortality after stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To determine the prognostic role of co-morbidity in medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Methods and materials

Between 2000 and 2007, 88 consecutive early-stage medically inoperable NSCLC patients were treated by linac-based SBRT. The dose was either 45 Gy or 67.5 Gy in three fractions prescribed to the isocenter. Baseline co-morbidities were retrospectively retrieved by consultation of a formal electronic registry of diagnoses as well as patients’ charts. The age-adjusted Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) was scored for each patient and subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

With a median follow-up of 44 months, the actuarial local control rate at 4 years was 89% while the median overall survival was 22 months. The median age-adjusted CCI score was 5. The age-adjusted CCI was a significant predictor of overall survival on both univariate (p = 0.002) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.011). Patients with an age-adjusted CCI score of 3 or less had a median survival of 41 months versus only 11 months for those scoring 6 or more.

Conclusion

The number and seriousness of co-morbidities predict overall survival in medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT. Because the determination of medical operability is frequently based on both objective measures and subjective clinical judgment, it is recommended that co-morbidity be formally indexed in all studies examining the outcomes of SBRT.     

Five-year Long-term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Operable Versus Medically Inoperable Stage I Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: Analysis by Operability,Fractionation Regimen,Tumor Size,and Tumor Location

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for medically inoperable stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is emerging as a surgical alternative in operable patients. However, limited long-term outcomes data exist, particularly according to operability. We hypothesized long-term local control (LC) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) would not differ by fractionation schedule, tumor size or location, or operability status, but overall survival (OS) would be higher for operable patients.