Alternative drug discovery approaches for orphan GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well-known drug targets. However, a question mark remains for the more than 100 orphan GPCRs as current deorphanisation strategies failed to identify specific ligands for these receptors. Recent advances have shown that orphan GPCRs may have important functions that are ligand-independent. Orphan GPCRs can modulate the function of well-defined drug targets such as GPCRs with identified ligands and neurotransmitter transporters though physical association with those molecules. Thus, compounds that bind to orphan GPCRs and allosterically regulate the function of the interacting partner or even disrupt the interaction with the latter could become new drugs.     

Development of novel ligands for peptide GPCRs

1. Download : Download high-res image (178KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Evolving pharmacology of orphan GPCRs: IUPHAR Commentary

The award of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Kobilka for their work on the structure and function of GPCRs, spanning a period of more than 20 years from the cloning of the human β₂-adrenoceptor to determining the crystal structure of the same protein, has earned both researchers a much deserved place in the pantheon of major scientific discoveries. GPCRs comprise one of the largest families of proteins, controlling many major physiological processes and have been a major focus of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC-IUPHAR) since its inception in 1987. We report here recent efforts by the British Pharmacological Society and NC-IUPHAR to define the endogenous ligands of ‘orphan’ GPCRs and to place authoritative and accessible information about these crucial therapeutic targets online.     

Second annual GPCRs: from orphan to blockbuster

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) was discussed at a recent Cambridge Healthtech Institute meeting. Scientists working in both academia and industry participated in 2 days of talks that addressed important issues related to the use of GPCRs as targets. The meeting delved into questions and strategies surrounding receptor structure, lack of knowledge about endogenous ligands, novel methodology for identifying compounds from high-throughput screening, the development process from hits to leads, and what constitutes adequate proof-of-principle studies. This report highlights several presentations related to the ongoing search for more effective GPCR-targeted drug discovery efforts.     

Neoceptors: reengineering GPCRs to recognize tailored ligands

Efforts to model and reengineer the putative binding sites of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have led to an approach that combines small-molecule 'classical' medicinal chemistry and gene therapy. In this approach, complementary structural changes (e.g. based on novel ionic or H-bonds) are made in the receptor and ligand for the selective enhancement of affinity. Thus, a modified receptor (neoceptor) is designed for activation by tailor-made agonists that do not interact with the native receptor. The neoceptor is no longer activated by the native agonist, but rather functions as a scaffold for the docking of novel small molecules (neoligands). In theory, the approach could verify the accuracy of GPCR molecular modeling, the investigation of signaling, the design of small molecules to rescue disease-related mutations, and small-molecule-directed gene therapy. The neoceptor-neoligand pairing could offer spatial specificity by delivering the neoceptor to a target site, and temporal specificity by administering neoligand when needed.     

Nonpeptide ligands that target peptide-activated GPCRs in inflammation

The focus of this review is on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for which nonpeptidic ligands are known and have been evaluated for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. GPCRs are the most prevalent class of cell surface proteins in pharmaceutical research today, and GPCR-targeting drugs account for one tenth of worldwide pharmaceutical sales. Of over 800 human GPCRs identified to date, several hundred are activated by peptides/proteins and just over 30 of these have been identified so far as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. This review highlights those GPCRs and over 60 structurally diverse nonpeptidic compounds that interact with them and display pro- or anti- inflammatory properties. Among these GPCR targets are the receptors for peptides like bradykinin, chemokines, complement anaphylatoxins, corticotropin releasing factor, endothelins, melanocortins, tachykinins, urocortins, as well as the protease activated receptors (PARs). Other peptide activated GPCRs implicated in inflammation, like those that bind angiotensin II, N-formyl peptides, galanin, neuropeptide Y, opioids and oxytocin, are only briefly discussed because there is either less direct association with inflammation or few/no nonpeptidic antiinflammatory ligands known. While it is still very early in the development of antiinflammatory drugs that target GPCRs, there is already a wealth of information supporting their important roles as cellular sentries in inflammatory diseases. New opportunities are emerging to evaluate antiinflammatory activities of potent and selective GPCR-binding ligands, including those being developed for other disease indications. In summary, GPCRs deserve a great deal more attention as potential therapeutic targets in inflammatory diseases.     

Maximizing serendipity: strategies for identifying ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell-surface receptors within the human genome, and historically these have been a rich source of targets for small-molecule modulation and therapeutic intervention. As a result of genome closure, numerous novel GPCRs that have unknown ligands and function were identified, and termed 'orphans'. These are considered potential new targets for drug discovery, and many companies have been focusing on ligand identification using high-throughput functional assays in the quest to discover a tool to further probe the pathophysiolgical role of these new receptors. In the past five years, approximately 50 receptors have been ligand-paired, although putative functions have only been described for the minority. The number of new small-molecule modulators that ultimately make it to the market will measure the success of this initiative.     

Novel neuropeptides as ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptors

Neuropeptides control a wide spectrum of physiological functions. They are central to our understanding of brain functions. They exert their actions by interacting with specific G protein-coupled receptors. We however have not found all the neuropeptides that exist in organisms. The search for novel neuropeptides is thus of great interest as it will lead to a better understanding of brain function and disorders. In this review, we will discuss the historical as well as the current approaches to neuropeptide discovery, with a particular emphasis on the orphan GPCR-based strategies. We will also discuss two novel peptides, neuropeptide S and neuromedin S, as examples of the impact of neuropeptide discovery on our understanding of brain functions. Finally, the challenges facing neuropeptide discovery will be discussed.     

Is Galpha16 the optimal tool for fishing ligands of orphan G-protein-coupled receptors?

Identification of natural ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors will help expand the boundaries of physiology and pharmacology. Powerful approaches are needed that can pair biologically active ligands with their corresponding receptors. Many attempts have been made to set up universal screening schemes such that receptor activation by its cognate ligand is transduced into a common intracellular signal that is amenable to high-throughput screening analysis. One possibility that achieves such a 'universal assay' takes advantage of the promiscuous nature of the G-protein subunit Galpha16. However, a truly critical look at Galpha16 is still required. In this article, the strengths, weaknesses, problems and pitfalls that are associated with the use of Galpha16 will be discussed, and suggestions of how problems might be overcome with an optimized universal G-protein system will be proposed.     

Novel GPCRs and their endogenous ligands: expanding the boundaries of physiology and pharmacology.

Nearly all molecules known to signal cells via G proteins have been assigned a cloned G-protein-coupled-receptor (GPCR) gene. This has been the result of a decade-long genetic search that has also identified some receptors for which ligands are unknown; these receptors are described as orphans (oGPCRs). More than 80 of these novel receptor systems have been identified and the emphasis has shifted to searching for novel signalling molecules. Thus, multiple neurotransmitter systems have eluded pharmacological detection by conventional means and the tremendous physiological implications and potential for these novel systems as targets for drug discovery remains unexploited. The discovery of all the GPCR genes in the genome and the identification of the unsolved receptor-transmitter systems, by determining the endogenous ligands, represents one of the most important tasks in modern pharmacology.     

Searching for neurotransmitters as cognate ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptor: finding receptor for melanin-concentrating hormone]

The melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a cyclic peptide, identified originally from salmon pituitary as a regulator of pigmentary changes in background adaptation. The rat homologue was later also found to be expressed in the lateral hypothalamus and the zona incerta. Several lines of evidence indicate that MCH is a critical regulator of feeding and energy homeostasis. Its receptor remained unknown until we identified it as the orphan G protein-coupled receptor SLC-1, using a function-based assay with G protein chimera. A wide application of our strategy will permit the discovery of more natural transmitters.     

GPCRs and cancer

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which represent the largest gene family in the human genome, play a crucial role in multiple physiological functions as well as in tumor growth and metastasis. For instance, various molecules like hormones, lipids, peptides and neurotransmitters exert their biological effects by binding to these seven-transmembrane receptors coupled to heterotrimeric G-proteins, which are highly specialized transducers able to modulate diverse signaling pathways. Furthermore, numerous responses mediated by GPCRs are not dependent on a single biochemical route, but result from the integration of an intricate network of transduction cascades involved in many physiological activities and tumor development. This review highlights the emerging information on the various responses mediated by a selected choice of GPCRs and the molecular mechanisms by which these receptors exert a primary action in cancer progression. These findings provide a broad overview on the biological activity elicited by GPCRs in tumor cells and contribute to the identification of novel pharmacological approaches for cancer patients.     

The evolving small-molecule fluorescent-conjugate toolbox for Class A GPCRs

The past decade has witnessed fluorescently tagged drug molecules gaining significant attraction in their use as pharmacological tools with which to visualize and interrogate receptor targets at the single-cell level. Additionally, one can generate detailed pharmacological information, such as affinity measurements, down to almost single-molecule detection limits. The now accepted utilization of fluorescence-based readouts in high-throughput/high-content screening provides further evidence that fluorescent molecules offer a safer and more adaptable substitute to radioligands in molecular pharmacology and drug discovery. One such drug-target family that has received considerable attention are the GPCRs; this review therefore summarizes the most recent developments in the area of fluorescent ligand design for this important drug target. We assess recently reported fluorescent conjugates by adopting a receptor-family-based approach, highlighting some of the strengths and weaknesses of the individual molecules and their subsequent use. This review adds further strength to the arguments that fluorescent ligand design and synthesis requires careful planning and execution; providing examples illustrating that selection of the correct fluorescent dye, linker length/composition and geographic attachment point to the drug scaffold can all influence the ultimate selectivity and potency of the final conjugate when compared with its unlabelled precursor. When optimized appropriately, the resultant fluorescent conjugates have been successfully employed in an array of assay formats, including flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, FRET and scanning confocal microscopy. It is clear that fluorescently labelled GPCR ligands remain a developing and dynamic research arena.Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Molecular Pharmacology of GPCRs. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue-5     

A model for the functioning of family 3 GPCRs

Family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the metabotropic glutamate (mglu) receptors, GABA(B) receptors, Ca(2+)-sensing receptors and some taste and putative pheromone receptors. All are composed of two domains, an extracellular ligand-binding domain and a transmembrane heptahelical domain that activates G proteins. Here we propose a model for the function of family 3 GPCRs that takes into account their structure. This model fits with specific pharmacological features of some family 3 GPCRs, such as modulation by positive and negative allosteric regulators. The model also reveals differences between GABA(B) receptors and Group I mglu receptors: in the former there is "tight" functional coupling between the two domains of the receptor whereas the "loose" coupling in the latter gives these receptors specific features not shared by many other GPCRs.