Disfluent speech in patients with partial epilepsy: beneficial effect of levetiracetam

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with partial epilepsy and disfluent speech. METHODS: Five consecutive patients with partial epilepsy and disfluent speech resulting from developmental or neurogenic stuttering were enrolled in a 9-week, open-label, prospective study. LEV was given in combination with carbamazepine (CBZ) or phenytoin (PHT) at dosages ranging from 500 to 1500mg twice daily. The severity of stuttering was assessed with the verbal fluency test (VFT), and with the patient global impression of improvement (PGI), at baseline and after 9weeks. Electroencephalography and serum monitoring of CBZ and PHT levels were done before and after the study. Seizure frequency was monitored. RESULTS: After LEV therapy, verbal fluency for all patients, as measured by the VFT, improved from 25% at baseline to 64%, as did the speed of oral reading, from 5 to 23%. On the PGI, all patients rated themselves as better and as having less disfluent speech after LEV therapy. For four patients with incomplete control of their seizures, the seizure count decreased by more than 50% after LEV therapy. The beneficial effect of LEV on verbal disfluency demonstrated on the PGI persisted for the entire period of observation, which ranged from 7 to 11 months. CONCLUSIONS: As an add-on therapy, LEV seems to improve verbal fluency in patients with partial epilepsy and disfluent speech. This effect seems unrelated to the antiepileptic activity of the drug. A placebo-controlled trial of LEV in patients with this kind of verbal disfluency is warranted.     

Attention and psychomotor speed decline in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: a longitudinal study

PURPOSE: To assess the possible cognitive alterations in epilepsy patients compared with controls over 5 years, and to investigate the clinical variables mainly implied in mental impairment. METHODS: In our longitudinal single-center study, 50 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and 50 controls were administered the same battery of comprehensive neuropsychological tests at baseline and after 5 years. RESULTS: TLE patients showed a significant impairment in attention and psychomotor speed compared with controls after 5 years, while the other cognitive domains did not exhibit any important changes. This worsening was mainly related to the duration of epilepsy, the age at onset, a history of tonic-clonic seizures and a low educational level. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that tapping the attention and psychomotor speed decline in TLE patients should be considered relevant for future research, in order to achieve a deeper understanding of the cognitive dimensions of this field.     

Effects of levetiracetam as an add-on therapy on cognitive function and quality of life in patients with refractory partial seizures

This study comprised two phases and evaluated the effects of levetiracetam (LEV), as an add-on treatment, on cognitive function and quality of life (QOL) in patients with refractory partial seizures. The short-term phase employed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design including an 8-week baseline period, 4-week titration interval, and 12-week period at the maximum LEV dose (1500 mg twice daily). The long-term phase was an open-label study in which the maximum LEV dose was administered for another 24 weeks. Neuropsychological tests and the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) inventory were administered at baseline, at the end of the short-term phase, and at the end of the long-term phase. Twenty-four eligible patients entered into the final phase. After short-term LEV treatment, performance time on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Delayed Logic Memory significantly improved for the patient group, but not the control group. Subscale scores on the QOLIE-31, including scores on Cognitive Functioning and Social Function, also improved only for the LEV group. At the end of the long-term phase, these improvements were maintained, and both groups performed better in more areas, as measured by the Trail Making Test, WCST, and Delayed Visual Memory in the neuropsychological battery and the QOLIE-31 subscales Overall QOL and Health Status. Thus, as an adjunctive therapy, LEV did not negatively affect and, in a way, improved cognitive function and QOL in patients with medically refractory partial seizures. Some of these improvements may be maintained during long-term treatment.     

A dopamine agonist, pramipexole, and cognitive functions in Parkinson's disease

The cognitive performance of 55 non-demented idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with levodopa alone or receiving dopamine agonist pramipexole as add-on therapy to levodopa was evaluated in the present study during 6 months of treatment. Neuropsychological tests were administered two times. In the first assessment to differentiate test sensitive to cognitive changes typical for PD control group was also assessed. After 6 months of treatment PD patients were retested only with tests that differentiate them from control group. Compared to controls PD patients showed inferior performance on Stroop Interference test, Trail Making test, letter fluency and Hooper Visual Organization Test. No statistically significant differences between two groups and first and second neuropsychological assessment were found. Present findings indicate that pramipexole as add-on therapy to levodopa is safe in non-demented PD patients in terms of the effect on cognitive performance.     

The influence of antiepileptic drugs on cognition: a comparison of levetiracetam with topiramate

Levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) are considered highly effective novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of focal epilepsies. To explore potential side effects, this study investigated their influence on cognitive functions comparatively by means of a standardized neuropsychological test battery assessing several cognitive domains. In this observational study, cognitive changes were explored in 30 consecutively recruited patients with focal epilepsy treated with LEV and in 21 patients treated with TPM, comparing functions assessed prior to gradual initiation and after reaching steady state of the individual target dosage. Before titration, patient groups did not differ significantly with respect to cognitive performance. Whereas the LEV group manifested no change in cognitive performance after AED titration, the TPM group worsened in the cognitive domains of cognitive speed and verbal fluency, as well as short-term memory. These findings suggest that TPM, unlike LEV, may impair frontal lobe functions. The lack of cognitive side effects related to LEV treatment may be relevant for treatment decisions.     

Levetiracetam in patients with generalised epilepsy and myoclonic seizures: an open label study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as either 'de novo' (monotherapy) or 'add-on' therapy in patients with different generalised epilepsies characterised by myoclonic seizures from an observational study. METHODS: We evaluated 35 patients (21 female, mean age 24.7 years) with different types of generalised epilepsies (juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), myoclonic-astatic epilepsy (MAE), myoclonic absences (MA), benign myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (BMEI) and 4 patients had unspecified epileptic syndromes). Patients received LEV as de novo monotherapy or add-on therapy. Seizure frequency changes and adverse events were observed. Follow-up was conducted for a period of 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Patients received LEV 2000-3000 mg/day as de novo (n = 8) and as add-on therapy. In total, 29 (82%) of the 35 patients achieved > or = 50% seizure frequency reduction, 15 (42%) patients achieved seizure freedom while a further 14 (40%) patients achieved > or = 50-99% seizure frequency reduction. Six (17%) patients discontinued LEV due to inefficacy or seizure worsening. Not even a single patient discontinued due to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that LEV as de novo (monotherapy) and add-on therapy at doses between 2000 and 3000 mg/day effectively reduces myoclonic seizure frequency in patients with generalised epilepsy. LEV was also well-tolerated.     

Cognitive functioning in community dwelling older adults with chronic partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: To examine cognitive functioning in community-dwelling older adults with chronic partial epilepsy and demographically matched healthy older adults. METHODS: Standardized measures of neurocognitive function were collected as part of an ongoing study investigating health-related quality-of-life issues in older adults with epilepsy. Cognitive tests consisted of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (subscales include attention, initiation/perseveration, construction, conceptualization, memory), Logical Memory subtest from the WMS-III (immediate and delayed recall scores), and word fluency. Mood was measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale. Older adults with epilepsy (n=25) and healthy older adults (n=27) completed testing. All participants were at least 60 years old, living independently in the community, and had no history of drug/alcohol abuse or life-threatening medical conditions. All older adults with epilepsy had been diagnosed as having medically intractable partial complex seizures, including those with histories of secondary generalization. RESULTS: Older adults with epilepsy demonstrated impairments across all cognitive measures compared with the healthy controls. Seizure onset (age) and seizure duration (years) were not statistically associated with neurocognitive function or self-reported mood. Older adults with epilepsy who were receiving antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy (n=11) displayed worse performance on the attention, initiation/perseveration, and memory subscales of the DRS and Logical Memory delayed recall score compared with those older adults with epilepsy receiving monotherapy (n=14). The number of AEDs taken was not associated with seizure frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Negative effects on cognitive function are experienced by older adults with chronic partial epilepsy. AED polytherapy may increase the risk for negative cognitive dysfunction.     

The perception of memory failures in patients with epilepsy

The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between subjective memory complaints and neuropsychological tests in the epilepsy population. We administered a Self Report Memory Questionnaire, based on possible everyday memory failures, two questionnaires on anxiety and depression and a battery of cognitive tests to 150 patients with epilepsy (n=100 with partial epilepsy, n=50 with idiopathic generalized epilepsy) and a control group (n=50). A discrepancy between the results of the memory questionnaire and the cognitive tests was found in the epilepsy patients: the Self Report Memory Questionnaire did not show any correlation with the psychological tests. The same discrepancy was not seen in the controls, where the memory questionnaire was related to two verbal memory tests. Furthermore, patients with epilepsy reported greater difficulties on the Self Report Memory Questionnaire than the controls (P < 0.05). It appeared that the tendency to overstate memory problems was mainly related to anxiety and depression, but was not connected with the type of epilepsy, nor with its duration (in years). Seizure frequency, on the other hand, seemed to greatly influence mood, which in turn is probably affect subjective memory perception.     

Levetiracetam in the treatment of childhood epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common pediatric neurologic disorder that is difficult to manage in a substantial portion of children. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) that has recently been approved as add-on treatment for various seizure types in epilepsy populations that include children: for refractory partial seizures in epilepsy patients ≥4 years old, for myoclonic seizures in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy patients ≥12 years old, and for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy patients (≥6 years old with FDA approval; ≥12 years old with EMEA approval). A review of published pediatric studies indicates that the efficacy of LEV is best established for partial seizures; however, results from recent double-blind and open-label trials indicate that adjunctive LEV also controls generalized seizures – particularly myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic – in children and adolescents with primary generalized epilepsy. LEV was well-tolerated in pediatric studies. The most common adverse events (AEs) reported were sedation related. Behavioral AEs were among the most commonly reported events in some trials; conversely, improvements in behavior and cognition were also frequently reported. LEV appears to be a safe and effective AED with unique characteristics that benefit the treatment of children with epilepsy.     

Elderly People and Epilepsy: Cognitive Function

Summary:  Purpose: To evaluate cognitive function in a group of elderly patients with focal epilepsy versus healthy controls.
Methods: A neuropsychological battery assessing major cognitive domains was administered to 40 patients with focal epilepsy aged ≥60 years, and to 40 controls matched for sex, age, and education.
Results: Epilepsy patients performed significantly worse in most of the administered tests than controls (p < 0.05). Poor cognitive performances correlated with use of polytherapy.
Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of epilepsy in the elderly, our results could have important implications for clinical and research purposes.     

Cognitive function in Nigerians with newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pattern of cognitive disturbances in Nigerian Africans with newly diagnosed epilepsy, prior to onset of drug therapy. METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients (mean age 31.6 +/- 17.4, range 14-55 years) presenting with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy were recruited for the study. Sixty healthy volunteers without a history of epilepsy and who were age-, sex- and level of education matched with the epileptic patients, were recruited as controls. The administration of cognitive tests was done with the FePsy computerized neuropsychological test battery. The tests administered were the visual and auditory reaction times, the continuous performance test and the recognition memory tests to assess mental speed, attention and memory respectively. The means of the cognitive performances of the epileptic patients and controls were statistically compared. RESULTS: Epileptic patients performed worse than the controls across the spectrum of cognitive tasks assessed (P = 0.00001; P < 0.025), with the exception of the beta parameter (response bias) of the vigilance test (P = 0.488; P > 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The cognitive impairments of short-term memory, psychomotor speed and sustained attention observed in this study are similar to those reported in the literature for patients with epilepsy. The results of this study will be useful in the counseling of patients on their educational, social and vocational needs.     

Levetiracetam reduces frequency and duration of epileptic activity in patients with refractory primary generalized epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug highly effective as add-on treatment in refractory partial epilepsies. In animal models, LEV is effective against absence seizures. A limited number of case reports and series indicate that LEV reduces seizure frequency in patients with generalized epilepsies. METHOD: We evaluated with continuous EEG eight adult patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). All patients were refractory to the conventional therapy for IGE. Four patients received LEV as add-on therapy, and in four, a conversion to LEV monotherapy was undergone. Epileptic activity was analyzed in order to determine spike-wave density as well as median and maximal duration of spike-wave discharges. Each patient underwent a 24h EEG baseline monitoring before starting LEV therapy. A second 24h EEG examination was performed after a mean follow-up period of 136 days. RESULTS: Spike-wave density (spikes/h) was reduced by 78% after LEV administration. Median spike-wave duration decreased by 72% (p < 0.05). Maximal spike-wave duration was 6s before, and 1.5s after LEV with a percentage change of 81% (p < 0.05). The four patients on LEV monotherapy evidenced also a considerably improvement after conversion. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that LEV produces a consistent long-term reduction of interictal epileptic activity in patients with refractory IGE. The reduction in the spike-wave activity additionally correlated with a clinically relevant antiepileptic effect. Our results support the concept that LEV could be an alternative therapy in primary generalized epilepsies.     

Attention and psychomotor speed decline in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: A longitudinal study

PurposeTo assess the possible cognitive alterations in epilepsy patients compared with controls over 5 years, and to investigate the clinical variables mainly implied in mental impairment.MethodsIn our longitudinal single-center study, 50 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and 50 controls were administered the same battery of comprehensive neuropsychological tests at baseline and after 5 years.ResultsTLE patients showed a significant impairment in attention and psychomotor speed compared with controls after 5 years, while the other cognitive domains did not exhibit any important changes. This worsening was mainly related to the duration of epilepsy, the age at onset, a history of tonic–clonic seizures and a low educational level.ConclusionsWe believe that tapping the attention and psychomotor speed decline in TLE patients should be considered relevant for future research, in order to achieve a deeper understanding of the cognitive dimensions of this field.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, LEV (500 or 1,000 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with uncontrolled simple or complex partial seizures, or both, with or without secondary generalization. After enrollment, three parallel groups were assessed during a baseline period of 8 or 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week evaluation period. RESULTS: LEV significantly decreased partial seizure frequency compared with placebo. A reduction in seizure frequency of > or =50% occurred in 22.8% of patients in the 1,000-mg group and 31.6% of patients in the 2,000-mg group, compared with 10.4% of patients in the placebo group. Administration of LEV did not affect plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs or alter vital signs or laboratory parameters. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between treatment groups (70.8% for the 1,000-mg group and 75.5% for the 2,000-mg group), or between the LEV and placebo groups (73.2% for placebo group). The most commonly reported adverse effects in the LEV group were asthenia, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of LEV (1,000 mg/d and 2,000 mg/d, administered in two divided doses) as add-on therapy was established in patients with refractory partial seizures in this clinical study.     

Motor and cognitive functions in newly diagnosed adult seizure patients before antiepileptic medication

OBJECTIVE: Motor and cognitive functions in patients with partial or generalized onset of seizures were evaluated prior to the administration of antiepileptic medication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Motor function, attention and memory of 52 consecutive newly diagnosed adult patients with partial or generalized seizures were assessed with neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: Patients with partial onset of seizures did not differ from patients with generalized seizures in tests of motor function or attention, nor in tests of learning and memory. Compared to controls patients with epilepsy performed significantly worse on visual motor tasks, mental flexibility and in delayed visual memory. Within the patient group as a whole lower education, higher age and symptomatic epilepsy with more abnormal CT scan findings tended to associate with worse performance in tests of concentration and mental flexibility and tests of memory. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that newly diagnosed adult patients with partial or generalized onset of seizures prior to treatment with antiepileptic medication experience some problems in visual motor tasks, mental flexibility and memory even without the numerous risk factors for cognitive deficits in epilepsy. In newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy as a whole symptomatic etiology was associated with somewhat more pronounced cognitive problems.     

Multiple cognitive deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

OBJECTIVE: To determine if more widespread cognitive deficits are present in a narrowly defined group of patients with the amnestic form of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: From a larger sample of patients clinically diagnosed as meeting the criteria of Petersen et al. for amnestic MCI, we selected 22 subjects who had Clinical Dementia Rating scores of zero on all domains besides memory and orientation. These MCI subjects with presumably isolated memory impairments were compared to 35 age-matched normal controls and 33 very mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients on a battery of neuropsychological tests. RESULT: In addition to the expected deficits in episodic memory, the amnestic MCI group performed less well than the controls but better than the AD group on design fluency, category fluency, a set shifting task and the Stroop interference condition. Over half the amnestic MCI group (vs. none of the normal controls) scored at least 1 standard deviation below control means on 4 or more of the nonmemory cognitive tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated memory impairment may be fairly uncommon in clinically diagnosed amnestic MCI patients, even when the criteria for amnestic MCI are fairly narrow. Additional cognitive impairments are likely to include fluency and executive functioning. These more diffuse deficits argue for comprehensive cognitive assessments, even when the patient and family are reporting only memory decline, and are consistent with the increase in attention paid to the heterogeneity of MCI.     

Significant improvement in frontal lobe associated neuropsychological functions after withdrawal of topiramate in epilepsy patients

RATIONALE: Topiramate (TPM) is a highly effective anticonvulsant drug, but a comparably high rate of cognitive adverse effects have been reported. In this study, we investigated changes in frontal lobe associated cognitive measures after TPM withdrawal in epilepsy patients hospitalized for presurgical evaluation. METHODS: Twenty epilepsy patients were administered a brief neuropsychological test battery before and after withdrawal of TPM. Neuropsychological evaluation included a verbal fluency task, verbal (Wechsler's digits) and spatial spans (Corsi block-tapping) and Trail Making Test (TMT, parts A and B). Median baseline dosage of TPM was 237.5mg/d, the median retest-interval was 8 days. Results were compared to a matched group of patients, who had been tested and retested before and after reduction of AEDs other than TPM at comparable time intervals. RESULTS: After TPM withdrawal, group performance appeared significantly improved in five of six tests administered. The scores of the control patients remained largely unchanged after drug reduction. After withdrawal, the scores of the TPM group did not differ significantly from the results of the control group whereas pronounced differences had been observed before. Individual improvement became apparent in the majority of patients. Cognitive performance was not correlated to current daily dosages/current blood serum levels of TPM. CONCLUSION: Withdrawal of TPM causes significant improvement in frontal lobe associated measures like verbal fluency and working memory. As withdrawal was part of the preoperative work-up, and not initiated because of patients' complaints or hints of intoxication, cognitive impairment due to TPM appears to be easily overlooked and underestimated.     

Neuropsychological and psychiatric impact of add-on titration of pregabalin versus levetiracetam: a comparative short-term study

Cognitive and behavioral impairments are common in patients with epilepsy. Multiple factors may contribute to these difficulties; among them is antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. We examined the short-term impact of two new add-on AEDs, pregabalin (PGB) and levetiracetam (LEV), on cognition and psychiatric states in 20 adult patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy, before and shortly after add-on titration. According to an open, prospective comparative trial, add-on PGB was titrated to 300 mg and add-on LEV to 1000 mg in 10 patients each. Patients were assessed before (T1) and 2 weeks after (T2) addition of the AED. During the trial, seizure frequency did not change significantly in either group. With PGB, patients manifested partly significant impairments in episodic memory of verbal and visual information. Psychiatric states were unchanged. With LEV treatment, we saw improvements in visual short-term memory performance and psychiatric states (i.e., interpersonal sensibility, depression, and anxiety). The comparison between PGB and LEV revealed a trend toward higher anxiety scores and higher variability in hostility scores with PGB that was significantly different from the trend with LEV. No significant differences were apparent in all other neuropsychological and psychiatric parameters investigated. This short-term study suggests that add-on LEV has a favorable neuropsychological and psychiatric impact. The negative neuropsychological effects of PGB may reflect temporary effects under titration. Still, the results did not confirm the promising effects on psychiatric comorbidity that have been emphasized by other reports.     

Cognitive function and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with bipolar disorder

Objectives:  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is an important contributor to the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD), and abnormalities in the BDNF-signaling system may be implicated in the cognitive decline observed in BD patients. We aimed to investigate serum BDNF levels in BD patients and its relation to neurocognitive function.
Methods:  We measured serum BDNF levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in 65 euthymic type I BD patients and 50 healthy controls, and administered a neuropsychological test battery to assess attention and mental control, perceptual-motor skills, executive functions, verbal fluency and abstraction, visuospatial attention, and memory.
Results:  We found no significant differences regarding serum BDNF levels in BD patients and healthy controls. We found significant positive associations between serum BDNF levels and illness duration, and manic and depressive episodes in female BD patients only. Serum BDNF levels were lower in patients medicated with antipsychotics and/or lithium, whereas patients on valproate and/or antidepressants showed higher serum BDNF levels. Patients performed significantly worse on 11 out of 16 neurocognitive tests as compared to controls. We found a significant positive association between serum BDNF levels and a test of verbal fluency in both BD patients and controls.
Conclusions:  Present results support the hypothesis that BDNF normalizes with mood stabilization and pharmacological treatment. Our findings in young and physically healthy patients with short illness duration and few mood episodes may explain the lack of association between serum BDNF levels and neurocognitive performance, even though cognitive performance in patients was overall significantly worse as compared to healthy controls.     

Levetiracetam during 1-year follow-up in children, adolescents, and young adults with refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in refractory crypto/symptomatic, partial or generalised epilepsy in children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 99 patients (age 12 months to 32 years, mean 14 years) with partial or generalised, crypto/symptomatic seizures. Levetiracetam was added to no more than two baseline AEDs and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: LEV was initiated at the starting dose of 10mg/kg/day with 5-day increments up to 50 mg/kg/day, unless it was not tolerated. Concomitant therapy was generally not modified throughout the study. After a mean follow-up period of 6.7 months (range 3 weeks to 29 months), 11 patients (11.1%) were free of seizures (cryptogenic partial epilepsy, 5; symptomatic partial epilepsy, 6). A more than 75% seizure decrease was found in 14 patients (14.1%) and >50% in 8 (8.1%). Seizures were unchanged in 38 (38.4%), and worsened in 23 (23.2%). Mild and transient adverse side effects were found in 17 patients (17.2%), mostly represented by irritability and drowsiness. CONCLUSION: LEV appears to be well tolerated in children and adolescents with severe epilepsy and seems to be a broad spectrum AED, though in our experience, it was more effective against partial seizures with or without secondarily generalisation. LEV efficacy in other epilepsy syndrome should be evaluated further in homogeneous, more selected patients.