The in vitro effects of aprotinin on twelve different ACT tests

Aprotinin is frequently used during CPB to reduce post-operative bleeding and attenuate the inflammatory response. The level of anticoagulation in these patients is monitored by using various activated clotting time (ACT) tests, which are generally accepted as being altered by the presence of aprotinin in blood. Therefore, we have investigated the effect of aprotinin on several ACT tests using whole blood from CPB patients. With IRB approval, blood samples were collected from patients undergoing CPB before and after full heparinization (300 u/kg). Each blood sample was divided into two aliquots, and aprotinin was added to one of them to yield a final calculated concentration of 300 KIU/mL. Both aliquots were used simultaneously to perform the 12 ACT tests. A paired Student's t-test was performed on the data. Overall, test results from 9 of 12 devices were significantly increased by aprotinin. Of these, four were increased only when the sample was heparinized, three were elevated by both heparinized and unheparinized blood, and two were elevated only when the sample was unheparinized. Each affected test responded uniquely to aprotinin, producing ACT test results ranging from 12 to 51% above nonaprotinized values. Several tests that were affected by aprotinin using heparinized blood samples were unaffected using unheparinized blood samples. These data emphasizes the unique manner in which individual ACT tests respond to aprotinized blood samples and should be considered when developing institutional policy for anticoagulation of aprotinized patients.     

The effects of aprotinin on thromboelastography with three different activators.

BACKGROUND: Thromboelastography is used for assessment of hemostasis. Adherence to thromboelastography-guided algorithms and aprotinin administration each decrease bleeding and blood product usage after cardiac surgery. Aprotinin, through inhibition of kallikrein, causes prolongation of the celite-activated clotting time and the activated partial thromboplastin ratio. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of aprotinin on the thromboelastography trace. METHODS: Three activators were used in the thromboelastography: celite (which is widely established), kaolin, and tissue factor. Assessment was performed on blood from volunteers and from patients before and after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: The tissue factor-activated thromboelastography trace was unaffected by the addition of aprotinin. When celite and kaolin were used as activators in the presence of aprotinin, the reaction time (time to clot formation) of the thromboelastography trace was prolonged (P < 0.0001) and the maximum amplitude (clot strength) was decreased (P < 0.05). With celite as an activator, the addition of aprotinin decreased (P < 0.05) the thromboelastography alpha angle (rate of clot extension). The reaction time of the celite-activated trace correlated with the activated partial thromboplastin ratio (P < 0.01). The reaction time of the tissue factor-activated trace correlated with the international normalized ratio (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The thromboelastography trace is altered in the presence of aprotinin when celite and kaolin are used as activators but not when tissue factor is the activator.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: an in vitro evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using SONOCLOT

The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U x mL(-1)), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU x mL(-1)), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% +/- 37% (2 U x mL(-1)) and 24% +/- 18% (3 U x mL(-1)), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect. IMPLICATIONS: Current standard techniques to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are affected by aprotinin, a drug widely used in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro a new, so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' test from SONOCLOT to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation more reliably in combination with aprotinin.     

Monitoring of heparin-induced anticoagulation with kaolin-activated clotting time in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin.

High-dose aprotinin appears to enhance the anticoagulant effects of heparin, as documented by increases in the activated clotting times (ACTs) during cardiopulmonary bypass; hence, some authorities have advocated reducing the dose of heparin in patients treated with aprotinin. An in vitro study by our group suggested that the increase of the ACT in the presence of aprotinin and heparin may be due to the use of celite as surface activator. We compared celite and kaolin as surface activators for the measurement of the ACT in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin and in patients given no aprotinin. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 30 patients, of whom 14 received aprotinin and 16 received a placebo. Before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass, the ACT was measured with two Hemochron 400 systems with 12 mg of either celite (C-ACT) or kaolin (K-ACT) used as surface activator and with one Hepcon HMS system (HR-ACT), which uses kaolin as activator. The latter also was used for measurement of the blood heparin concentration. The ACTs of blood without heparin did not differ between aprotinin and control patients. During anticoagulation with heparin and cardiopulmonary bypass, the average C-ACTs were 784 +/- 301 s (aprotinin) and 496 +/- 120 s (control) (P < .001); the K-ACTs were 502 +/- 131 s (aprotinin) and 458 +/- 101 s (control) (P > .05); the HR-ACTs were 406 +/- 87 s (aprotinin) and 423 +/- 82 s (control) (P > .05), which was consistently less than C-ACT and K-ACT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of temperature and aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass on three different methods of activated clotting time measurement

The activated clotting time (ACT) is used frequently for monitoring blood anticoagulant response with heparin before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Many cardiac procedures involving CPB require reduction of the patient's blood temperature and use of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin. Three different methods of ACT measurement were compared to show the effects of different CPB temperatures and the presence of aprotinin. A total of 42 patients were included in the study: 14 received CPB at 28 degrees C, 14 received CPB at 32 degrees C, and 14 normothermic (37 degrees C) CPB. Within each temperature group, seven received aprotinin. The ACT in each group of patients was measured by a celite activator (C-ACT), a kaolin activator (K-ACT), and a celite, kaolin and glass activator (MAX-ACT). All three methods of ACT measurement showed significant increases (p < .05) in clotting times at hypothermic CPB compared with normothermic groups. During heparinization the C-ACT was significantly increased (p < .05) in the presence of aprotinin. Comparability between the 3 ACT measurement methods showed a very high correlation between C-ACT and K-ACT clotting times (R2 = .8962), and slightly lower correlation between MAX-ACT and C-ACT (R2 = .7780), and MAX-ACT and K-ACT (R2 = .7827). All ACT measurements are affected by changes in blood temperature. The C-ACT measurement is prolonged with aprotinin, whereas the MAX-ACT and K-ACT method of measurement in the presence of aprotinin are not significantly altered. It appears that the MAX-ACT produces lower values and may necessitate additional heparin therapy for ACT target values considered safe during CPB. Further study is required from these additional findings.     

The Effects of Aprotinin on Thromboelastography with Three Different Activators

Background : Thromboelastography is used for assessment of hemostasis. Adherence to thromboelastography-guided algorithms and aprotinin administration each decrease bleeding and blood product usage after cardiac surgery. Aprotinin, through inhibition of kallikrein, causes prolongation of the celite-activated clotting time and the activated partial thromboplastin ratio. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of aprotinin on the thromboelastography trace.

Methods : Three activators were used in the thromboelastography: celite (which is widely established), kaolin, and tissue factor. Assessment was performed on blood from volunteers and from patients before and after cardiac surgery.

Results : The tissue factor-activated thromboelastography trace was unaffected by the addition of aprotinin. When celite and kaolin were used as activators in the presence of aprotinin, the reaction time (time to clot formation) of the thromboelastography trace was prolonged (P < 0.0001) and the maximum amplitude (clot strength) was decreased (P < 0.05). With celite as an activator, the addition of aprotinin decreased (P < 0.05) the thromboelastography [alpha] angle (rate of clot extension). The reaction time of the celite-activated trace correlated with the activated partial thromboplastin ratio (P < 0.01). The reaction time of the tissue factor-activated trace correlated with the international normalized ratio (P < 0.01).     

In vitro effects of aprotinin on activated clotting time measured with different activators.

The effects in vitro of aprotinin on the activated clotting time measured with both celite- and kaolin-activated tubes were investigated in 21 consecutive patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Four whole-blood samples (2 ml per sample) from each patient were tested simultaneously with Hemochron automated timing systems (International Technidyne Corp., Edison, N.J.) before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. One tenth milliliter of either aprotinin (at a final concentration of 80, 120, or 180 KIU/ml) or saline solution was mixed in vitro with blood samples before determination of the activated clotting time. Aprotinin had no inhibitory effect on the activated clotting times of unheparinized blood. After heparin administration, aprotinin in the above concentrations prolonged the activated clotting times measured with celite-activated tubes by 47% to 71%, as compared with the measurements of the activated clotting time without the addition of aprotinin. The activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes were not increased, however, by the in vitro addition of aprotinin. Our in vitro results indicate that aprotinin in concentrations from 80 to 180 KIU/ml does not significantly enhance the inhibitory effects of heparin on the intrinsic coagulation system as evaluated by measurement of the activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes. The anticoagulation effect of heparin in patients receiving aprotinin infusion should be monitored with kaolin-activated instead of celite-activated tubes because the celite makes the measured activated clotting time unreliable in patients receiving aprotinin therapy. These in vitro results require confirmation in vivo in patients receiving aprotinin therapy.     

The plasma supplemented modified activated clotting time for monitoring of heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation

The standard celite or kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) correlates poorly with heparin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared a modified kaolin ACT, in which plasma was supplemented, to a standard undiluted kaolin ACT for monitoring heparin levels during CPB. Fifteen patients undergoing normothermic CPB were enrolled in this prospective study. Heparin management was performed according to the Hepcon HMS results (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The ACTs were performed with the ACT II device (Medtronic). Hepcon HMS calculations, standard kaolin ACTs, and plasma supplemented modified ACTs (mACTs), prepared by diluting blood samples 1:1 with human plasma (Behring, Marburg, Germany), were measured every 30 min during CPB. The data obtained were correlated to the plasma chromogenic anti-Xa activity as a reference assay for heparin levels. A total of 64 samples were evaluated. The chromogenic anti-Xa activity ranged from 0.2 to 5.5 IU/mL. The Hepcon HMS calculations ranged from 2.7-8.2 IU/mL of heparin, the standard ACT ranged from 424 to >999 s, and the mACT ranged from 210 to 801 s. The correlation to the chromogenic anti-Xa method was r = 0.43 for the standard kaolin ACT and r = 0.69 for the plasma mACT. The plasma mACT provided an improved correlation to chromogenically measured levels of anti-Xa activity during CPB. The improved correlation most likely results from a correction of the effects of the impairment of the coagulation system caused by hemodilution and consumption of procoagulants on extracorporeal surfaces. IMPLICATIONS: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the plasma modified kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) provides a better correlation with heparin levels than the standard kaolin ACT.     

The effects of aprotinin on platelet function in blood exposed to eptifibatide: an in vitro analysis

The preoperative use of platelet inhibitors has increased the risk of bleeding during cardiac surgery. Aprotinin has been shown to preserve hemostatic function in patients undergoing CPB. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of aprotinin on coagulation in blood exposed to eptifibatide. Freshly collected bovine blood was used in an in vitro model of extracorporeal circulation. Blood was separated into two groups: activated (60 minutes exposure to bubble oxygenation) and nonactivated. Within each group there were four subgroups: control (n = 3), eptifibatide (2.8 microg/mL, n = 3), aprotinin (250 KIU/mL, n = 3), and eptifibatide with aprotinin (2.8 microg/mL, 250 KIU/mL, n = 3). Twenty-four modified extracorporeal circuits utilizing a hard-shell venous reservoir and cardioplegia heat exchangers were used. Blood flow was maintained at a rate of 1.25 L/min for a total of 170 minutes, at 37 +/- 1 degree C. Samples were collected at 0, 20, 50, and 110 minutes with the following variables measured: thromboelastograph (TEG), activated clotting time (ACT), and hematocrit (Hct). Results demonstrated that at 110 minutes, the TEG index (TI) was decreased by four-fold in the activated group compared to the nonactivated group (-4.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.5, p < .05). The administration of aprotinin resulted in preservation of the TI as compared to eptifibatide-treated blood (-4.9 +/- 1.2 vs. -7.9 +/- 1.2, p < .05). Aprotinin combined with eptifibatide reduced coagulation derangements when compared to eptifibatide alone (-5.2 +/- 1.2 vs. -7.9 +/- 1.2, p < .05). In conclusion, aprotinin attenuated the platelet inhibition effect of eptifibatide during in vitro CPB, resulting in improved coagulation.     

在体外及体外循环中抑肽酶对ACT的影响

选择健康献血员及心内直视手术病，观察抑肽酶对全血活化凝血时间的影响。结果：在体外肝素剂量与ＡＣＴ有显著线性相关。抑肽酶单狡应用并不使ＡＣＴ延，但与肝素合用可协同性延长ＡＣＴ值；在体外循环中抑肽酶延长ＡＣＴ的值更为显著，一般超过８００ｓ。结论：抑肽酶可与肝素协同性延长ＡＣＴ，体外循环中应用抑肽酶时应以ＡＣＴ大于８００ｓ作为肝素抗凝标准。     

Is the kaolin or celite activated clotting time affected by tranexamic acid?

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the activated clotting time is frequently used for determination of anticoagulation, and either Celite or kaolin are used as activators. If aprotinin is administered concomitantly, the Celite activated clotting time (C-ACT) becomes significantly higher than the kaolin activated clotting time (K-ACT). Therefore, insufficient anticoagulation using C-ACT in the presence of aprotinin is a major concern. Whether the application of tranexamic acid (TA), a pharmacologic alternative to aprotinin, has similar effects has not been studied before. METHODS: An in vitro study using the blood of healthy volunteers was performed. Both C-ACT and K-ACT were measured at baseline, after adding TA, and after adding TA and heparin. In addition, 30 patients undergoing primary cardiac operations had simultaneous measurements of C-ACT and K-ACT after skin-incision, 5 minutes after the application of heparin and TA, every 30 minutes during cardiopulmonary bypass, and 10 minutes after the application of protamine. RESULTS: In vitro, C-ACT and K-ACT correlated significantly at each measurement. Tranexamic acid had no influence on the activated clotting time. In vivo, C-ACT and K-ACT did not differ significantly, but at each time C-ACT tended to be greater than K-ACT (p = 0.086). The average difference between K-ACT and C-ACT was stable before and after the application of TA (p = 0.85) but the variability of the differences significantly increased during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of TA does not seem to differentially affect the mean C-ACT and K-ACT. No recommendation seems warranted to prefer one activator over the other in patients receiving TA.     

Effects of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin on kaolin-based activated clotting time: in vitro comparison of two different point of care devices

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), measurement of kaolin-based activated clotting time (kACT) is a standard practice in monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation. Despite the fact that the kACT test from the Sonoclot Analyzer (SkACT) has been commercially available for several years, no published data on the performance of SkACT are available. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to compare SkACT with an established kACT from Hemochron (HkACT). METHODS: Blood was withdrawn from 25 patients before elective cardiac surgery. SkACT and HkACT were measured in duplicate after in vitro administration of heparin (0, 1, 2 and 3 U/ml), calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution (25% and 50% haemodilution) and aprotinin (200 kIU/ml). RESULTS: A total of 600 duplicate kACT measurements were obtained from 25 cardiac surgery patients. Overall, mean bias +/- SD between SkACT and HkACT was 7 +/- 70 s (1.3% +/- 14.1%). Administration of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin induced a comparable effect on both activated clotting time (ACT) tests. Mean bias ranged from -4 +/- 39 s (-1.7% +/- 12.9%) to 4 +/- 78 s (3.2% +/- 15.6%) for heparinzed blood samples after haemodilution or aprotinin application and increased after combined aprotinin administration and haemodilution. After haemodilution and administration of aprotinin, both ACT tests were less reliable for values >480 s in heparinized blood samples. CONCLUSION: Accuracy and performance of SkACT and HkACT were comparable after in vitro administration of heparin, aprotinin and haemodilution. Both ACT tests were considerably affected by aprotinin and haemodilution.     

Plasma aprotinin concentrations during cardiac surgery: full- versus half-dose regimens

Aprotinin is an effective but expensive drug used during cardiac surgery to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. Currently, aprotinin is administered to adults according to a fixed protocol regardless of the patient's weight. The purpose of this study was to determine aprotinin levels in patients receiving full- and half-dose aprotinin regimens by a simple functional aprotinin assay and to design a more individualized aprotinin dosage regimen for cardiac surgical patients. The mean plasma aprotinin concentration peaked 5 min after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (full 401 +/- 92 KIU/mL, half 226 +/- 56 KIU/mL). The mean plasma aprotinin concentration after 60 min on cardiopulmonary bypass was less (full 236 +/- 81 KIU/mL, half 160 +/- 63 KIU/mL). There was large variation in the aprotinin concentration among patients. A statistically significant correlation was found between aprotinin concentration and patient weight (r(2) = 0.67, P < 0.05). Implications: The current dosing schedule for aprotinin results in a large variation in aprotinin plasma concentrations among patients and a large variation within each patient over time. We combined the information provided by our study with that of a previous pharmacokinetic study to develop a potentially improved, weight-based, dosing regime for aprotinin.     

Aprotinin reduces intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in membrane oxygenator cardiopulmonary bypass.

To determine whether aprotinin can provide a significant improvement of hemostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass using a membrane oxygenator, we tested this drug in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The subjects were 80 male patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass grafting. Forty patients received aprotinin and 40 patients served as placebo controls. Aprotinin (4 x 10(6) KIU) was given as a continuous infusion, starting before operation and continuing until after cardiopulmonary bypass; additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU aprotinin was added to the pump prime. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, respectively two thirds and one third of the total perioperative blood loss, were both significantly reduced in the aprotinin-treated group (p less than 0.01). The total average perioperative blood loss, corrected to a hemoglobin concentration of 7 mmol/L, was 550 mL in the aprotinin-treated patients versus 900 mL in the control patients. This reduction in blood loss, furthermore, significantly decreased the amount of postoperative blood transfusions (p less than 0.05) and increased the percentage of patients who did not receive postoperative donor blood from 42% to 68%. Aprotinin increased the activated clotting time significantly during cardiopulmonary bypass, which led to a reduction in heparin usage. The improved hemostasis during operation, despite the prolonged activated clotting time, might even abolish the need for heparin conversion with protamine at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, thus allowing retransfusion through cardiotomy suction to be continued, which saves the blood that is currently lost with vacuum suction.     

The in vitro effects of antithrombin III on the activated coagulation time in patients on heparin therapy

Heparin requires antithrombin III (AT) to achieve anticoagulation, and patients on continuous small-dose heparin preoperatively experience decreased levels of AT-causing heparin resistance. When this occurs, 2-4 units of fresh frozen plasma ( approximately 1000 units of AT) are often administered to increase AT levels and restore heparin responsiveness. We evaluated purified human AT concentrate (Thrombate III; Bayer, Inc., Elkhart, IN) to restore in vitro anticoagulation responses in patients receiving heparin. Blood samples were obtained from cardiac surgery patients including 22 patients receiving heparin and 21 patients not receiving heparin preoperatively. Heparin was added to blood in final concentrations of 4.1, 5.4, and 6.8 U/mL (equivalent to 300, 400, and 500 U/kg), and kaolin-activated clotting times (ACTs) were determined with and without AT at a final concentration of 0.2 units/mL to mimic fresh frozen plasma administration. The mean duration of preoperative heparin therapy was 4.0 days (range 2-10 days). AT activity was 69% +/- 9% in patients receiving heparin and 92% +/- 8% in patients not receiving heparin (P < 0.01). Heparin >4.1 U/mL failed to further increase ACT values in all patients. Attempts to increase ACT in patients receiving heparin may require supplemental AT administration. Purified AT even in small doses significantly prolongs the ACT response to heparin. Implications: In vitro addition of antithrombin III (0.2 U/mL) to heparinized blood samples (4.1-6.8 units of heparin/mL) from patients on previous heparin therapy increases sensitivity to supplemental heparin as reflected by significantly prolonged activated clotting time.     

Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Intraoperative administration of the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin causes reduction in blood loss and homologous blood requirement in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To ascertain the blood-saving effect of aprotinin and to obtain further information about the mode of action, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aprotinin or placebo treatment. Aprotinin was given as a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) before surgery followed by a continuous infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery. Additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU were added to the pump prime. Strict criteria were used to obtain a homogeneous patient selection. Total blood loss was reduced from 1,431 +/- 760 ml in the control group to 738 +/- 411 ml in the aprotinin group (P less than 0.05) and the homologous blood requirement from 838 +/- 963 ml to 163 +/- 308 ml (P less than 0.05). In the control group, 2.3 +/- 2.2 U of homologous blood or blood products were given, and in the aprotinin group, 0.63 +/- 0.96 U were given (P less than 0.05). Twenty-five percent of patients in the control group and 63% in the aprotinin group did not receive banked blood or homologous blood products. The activated clotting time as an indicator of inhibition of the contact phase of coagulation was significantly increased before heparinization in the aprotinin group (141 +/- 13 s vs. 122 +/- 25 s) and remained significantly increased until heparin was neutralized after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Activated clotting time (ACT) testing: analysis of reproducibility

Activated Clotting Time (ACT) has been the standard for monitoring heparin anticoagulation in cardiac surgery for three decades. Although a 10% coefficient of variation (CV) is the referenced standard for the test, no recent reports of precision are available. The precision of Hemochron FTCA510 (celite) and KACT (kaolin) ACT test tubes was evaluated using a retrospective analysis of results from both laboratory studies and routine clinical usage. Laboratory studies of reproducibility included analysis of the CV from repetitive testing using multiple lots of ACTs. Substrates used included 40 consecutive lots of control plasma and freshly heparinized donor blood. Across the lots of control plasma, the celite ACT yielded an average CV of 5.4% for the normal control level and 4.0% in the abnormal control level (range 3.6-9.7% and 2.7-6.3%, respectively). The KACT showed similar performance for the normal (mean = 4.5%, range 2.2-7.8%) and abnormal (mean = 3.8%, range 2.0-10.0%). These values, significantly less than 10%, reflect the combined variability of both the ACT tests and the lyophilized, single use vial, control material. Fresh whole blood samples exhibited improved ACT precision when compared to this artificial substrate. CVs for the celite ACT range from 0.6-6.0% at one unit heparin/ml blood to 2.4-11.6% at 5 units/ml where clotting times exceed 650 sec. The KACT showed even lower CVs at all heparin levels, with values of 2.4-7.0%. Clinical evaluations included samples (N = 56) collected from cardiac surgery patients with celite ACT values ranging to 744 sec. Duplicate values differed by an average of 7.5 sec or 1.8%. There was only one clinically significant difference in paired values; a 376 sec paired with a 406 sec, 400 sec being the clinical target time. This retrospective data analysis demonstrates that Hemochron ACT variability is significantly less than 10%.     

Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirements after coronary artery bypass grafting: similar efficacy of tranexamic acid and aprotinin in aspirin-treated patients

BACKGROUND: In patients with coronary artery disease, continuation of aspirin may reduce the incidence of unstable angina and preoperative myocardial infarction before surgery, but the risk of perioperative bleeding may be increased. METHODS: The efficacy of aprotinin and tranexamic acid (TXA) was examined in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial involving 56 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting and who received aspirin 100 mg/day until the day of the operation. Group I received high-dose aprotinin whereas group II received 10 g of tranexamic acid (TXA) over 20 minutes before sternotomy. Heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass was controlled with HDTT (high-dose thrombin time) to eliminate interference of aprotinin on ACT (celite activated clotting time). Postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were registered during the first 24 hours. RESULTS: The demographics, coagulation, and intraoperative parameters were similar in both groups. Postoperative blood loss (aprotinin 840 mL /24 hours, TXA 880 mL/24 hours, p = 0.481), and transfusion requirements (2.18 units/patient in the aprotinin group, 2.11 units/patient in the TXA group) were not remarkably different between the two regimen protocols. No perioperative myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular event, or other thrombotic events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, we were not able to demonstrate any difference in postoperative bleeding in patients pretreated with aspirin after high-dose aprotinin or TXA. From a practical point of view, TXA is safe, less expensive than aprotinin, and easy to handle, and can be recommended in patients pretreated with aspirin to improve postoperative hemostasis.     

Aprotinin and hemostasis monitoring concerns during cardiac surgery

Aprotinin (Trasylol) is a serine protease inhibitor, isolated from bovine lung that initially was marketed for the treatment of pancreatitis. In the mid 1980s, reports of its ability to decrease hemorrhaging after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery introduced the drug to the realm of cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, its introduction into this arena was followed by the publication of multiple studies and case reports that blamed aprotinin for poor outcomes in the form of early graft closure. More than 17 years have passed since the initial article describing the use of aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass, and with time there has been a significant increase in scientific knowledge and clinical experience. Interestingly, modern literature does not support the dogma that aprotinin is a procoagulant. Aprotinin increases the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), as well as the kaolin- and celite-activated clotting time (ACT), regardless of heparin. Aprotinin, because of its ability to inhibit kallikrein, has been found to decrease thrombin antithrombin III complexes, fibrin-split products, fibrinopeptide 1+2, prothrombin fragments, and all markers of thrombin formation. Some authors have suggested that it may have a synergistic effect with heparin to ensure graft patency. Anticoagulation monitoring during the use of aprotinin also has been developed based on early studies. Aprotinin administration does influence the results of various ACT tests, and consequently different methods of testing anticoagulation have been developed. Researchers have demonstrated that the celite ACT is not "artificially" prolonged in the presence of heparin and aprotinin, rather the kaolin ACT is "artificially" shortened. This article will review the scientific literature with regard to aprotinin's anticoagulatory effects and review the current recommendations for hemostasis monitoring during the use of aprotinin.     

Effects of aprotinin on endothelium-dependent relaxation of large coronary arteries

Objective: Aprotinin is widely used in heart surgery for reduction of intraoperative blood loss. But recent reports presenting results from rat aorta experiments claimed that aprotinin selectively impairs endothelium-dependent relaxation (EDR) as well as basal NO availability in concentrations similar to doses routinely used in cardiovascular surgery. An impairment of coronary EDR by aprotinin would be a great danger for any cardiothoracic intervention. We therefore tested the influence of aprotinin in the coronary arteries of a non-rodent species. Methods: Fresh coronary arteries of pigs were obtained from the local slaughterhouse and transported to our laboratory in cold oxygenated Krebs–Henseleit solution. Five-millimeter long rings were consecutively tested with or without aprotinin in concentrations of 500 KIU/ml (n = 7) or 1000 KIU/ml (n = 6) in oxygenated normothermic Krebs–Henseleit solution. PGF₂ (10 μmol/l) was used for inducing contraction and substance P (10 nmol/l) for inducing EDR, which was calculated in percentage of the precontraction. Indomethacin (10 μmol/l) was added in all measurements to eliminate the influence of prostaglandins. In additional similar experiments (n = 5), the influence of 1000 KIU/ml aprotinin on the EDR caused by the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) was tested using l-NNA (300 μmol/l) to block all NO formation. Results: The EDR of pig coronaries (82 ± 5% or 80 ± 5% of the precontraction in the control tests before and after aprotinin exposure) was not significantly changed by 500 KIU/ml aprotinin (78 ± 7%). A small, but significant reduction of less than 1/10 of the EDR was induced by 1000 KIU/ml aprotinin (74 ± 5%). After accounting for l-NNA for NO blockage, no aprotinin-related difference remained (59 ± 6% vs 60 ± 6% in controls). Conclusion: For clinically relevant concentrations of aprotinin up to 500 KIU/ml, no significant reduction of the EDR can be found in epicardial coronary arteries of the pig. For higher doses of 1000 KIU/ml, a reduction in NO production seems to be the cause of the small but significant reduction of the EDR by aprotinin. Therefore, danger for impairment of coronary EDR by aprotinin at clinical dosage levels, as suggested by studies on rat aortas, seems to be absent in coronary arteries of a large mammalian model.