中文版《新生儿疼痛和不适量表》在0至5岁儿童急性发热舒适度的信度和效度研究

目的 评估中文版《新生儿疼痛与不适量表》（EDIN）在0～5岁儿童急性发热时舒适度研究中的信度、效度和反应度。方法 对英文版EDIN量表行翻译、回译,语言学、儿科学和量表学专家对EDIN翻译版本进行讨论、修改,形成中文EDIN预试验版。邀约5名儿科临床专家和30名急性发热儿童的监护人,在不对量表条目进行解释情况下,当场填写中文EDIN预试验版,分别行表面效度检验,形成中文版EDIN。纳入四川大学华西第二医院收治的100例0～5岁急性发热患儿作为中文版EDIN评价人群,行信度、效度和反应度评价,并以Wong-Baker量表为标准,检验中文版EDIN与Wong-Bakerl表测定结果的相关性。结果 ①5名儿科临床专家和30名急性发热患儿的监护人对中文EDIN预试验版填写完整,完成时间均＜5 min,反映中文版EDIN条目表达清楚,易于理解。② 97例急性发热患儿家长完成了对中文版EDIN填写,其数据用于信效度分析。分半信度为0.887,重测信度为0.734,总克朗巴赫系数为0.892。③中文版EDIN各条目的相关系数（r）在0.513~0.782,各条目与量表总分间的r在0.788~0.896。④对5个条目进行主成分分析,显示面部活动对总体方差贡献率为78.4%。⑤中文版EDIN与Wong-Baker量表得分的r为0.885,标准关联效度非常好。⑥分别在入院2 h后和首次填写72 h后行中文版EDIN评价,量表得分分别为7.56和2.82,效应尺度为-1.45,差异有统计学意义（P均为0.000）。结论 中文版EDIN信度、标准关联效度和反应度均良好,结构效度有待进一步验证,基本可以用于中国0～5岁儿童急性发热舒适度评价。     

Pain assessment in the neonate using the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates

BACKGROUND: Neonates who require treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are subjected to many invasive painful procedures. AIMS: Assessment of pain in preterm and term neonates with or without ventilation on continuous positive airway pressure using the Bernese Pain-Scale for Neonates (BPSN). The validity and the reliability of the BPSN was established. STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Pain assessments (n=288) were performed by 6 health care workers in different situations of term and preterm neonates. Each neonate (n=12) was observed in four given situations (after feeding, while a foot was being warmed, while a routine capillary blood sample was taken and 15 min after the blood sample was taken). Pain assessments were made by two nurses at the bedside using the BPSN, the Visual-Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). At the same time, a video sequence was made which was shown later to four different nurses to assess pain using the BPSN, the PIPP, and the VAS. RESULTS: The construct validity of the BPSN was very good (F=41.3, p<0.0001). Moreover, concurrent and convergent validity of the BPSN compared to VAS and PIPP was r=0.86, and r=0.91, p<0.0001, respectively. Finally, the study demonstrated high coefficients for interrater (r=0.86-0.97) and intrarater reliability (r=0.98-0.99). CONCLUSION: The BPSN was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain in term and preterm neonates with and without ventilation.     

Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R)

Objectives

To examine the construct validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised in infants of varying gestational ages, diagnoses, and procedures.

Methods

A prospective cross-over study with infants in three gestational age groups (26–31, 32–36, and ≥ 37 weeks) at three university-affiliated Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Canada. One hundred and ninety five bedside nurses and expert raters rated 202 hospitalized infants' pain during scheduled procedures using the measure. An expert rater and a nurse independently assessed infants' pain scores, using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised, during 246 scheduled pairs of painful and non-painful procedures in the 202 infants. Nurses also completed a feasibility survey on using the measure in a clinical setting. To establish construct validity, pain scores were computed during painful and non-painful procedures. Inter-rater reliability between pain experts and nurses was calculated. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure feasibility in terms of clarity, ease of use, and time to complete.

Results

Irrespective of gestational age, Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised scores were significantly higher during painful procedures (mean 6.7 [SD 3.0]) compared to non-painful procedures (mean 4.8 [SD 2.9]). There was a high degree of correlation between nurses' and experts' ratings for painful (all R² = 0.92, p < 0.001) and non-painful (all R² = 0.87, p < 0.001) procedures. Mean scores on all feasibility indicators were equal to or higher than 3.8.

Discussion

The Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised has beginning construct validation, inter-rater reliability, and is considered feasible by clinicians. Concurrent validation studies should be considered.     

Development and validation of the ABC pain scale for healthy full-term babies

AIM: We developed and validated a pain scale (ABC scale) for term babies based on acoustic features of crying. METHODS: The scale consisted of three different cry parameters: (a) pitch of the first cry; (b) rhythmicity of the crying bout; (c) constancy of crying intensity. These parameters were previously found to distinguish between medium and high levels of pain measured by spectral analysis of crying. We validated the scale using healthy term babies undergoing routine heel prick. Concurrent validity was assessed comparing pain values obtained with our scale with those obtained with another pain scale; this relationship was also used to assess the sensitivity of the scale. To assess specificity we compared the ABC scores during a painful event (heel prick) with two non-painful events (preliminary phase of prick in the same group of babies, and heel prick with analgesia in another group). RESULTS: Specificity: (a) analgesic/non-analgesic comparison, p < 0.0001; (b) pain/sham comparison, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity: a high correlation between scores of the ABC scale and the Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-Né scale indicates good sensitivity. Concurrent validity: Spearman rho = 0.91. Internal consistency: Cronbach's alpha = 0.76. Inter-rater reliability: Cohen's kappa for multiple raters = 0.83. Intra-rater reliability: Cohen's kappa = 0.85. Practicality: All nurses who used it scored the scale as "good". CONCLUSION: The ABC scale proved to be simple and reliable for assessing pain in healthy, non-intubated term newborns.     

Is the ABC pain scale reliable for premature babies?

AIM: We recently developed the ABC scale to assess pain in term newborns. The aim of the present study was to assess the reliability of the scale in preterm babies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The scale consists of three cry parameters: (a) pitch of the first cry, (b) rhythmicity of the bout of crying and (c) cry constancy. Changes in these parameters were previously found to distinguish medium and high levels of pain as evaluated by spectral analysis of crying. We enrolled 72 babies to perform the steps usually requested to validate a scale, namely the study of the concurrent validity, specificity and sensibility. Moreover, we assessed the interjudge reliability and the clinical utility and ease of the scale. RESULTS: A good correlation (r = 0.68; r(2)= 0.45; p < 0.0001) was found between scores obtained with the ABC scale and the premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scale, demonstrating a good concurrent validity. The scale also showed good sensitivity and specificity (we found statistically significant differences between mean values of scores obtained in babies who underwent pain and babies who underwent non-painful stimulus.) Interobserver reliability was good: Cohen's kappa = 0.7. CONCLUSION: The good correlation between the two scales shows that the ABC scale is also reliable for premature babies.     

A measurement scale to assess responsive feeding among Cambodian young children

The caregiver–child interaction during mealtime, which refers to responsive feeding (RF), influences child's dietary intake. In Cambodia, given the level of malnutrition, getting better knowledge of RF among young children is essential, but to do so, using an appropriate assessment tool is necessary. We aim to develop and to validate a measurement tool to assess RF in two different situations (before and after an intervention) among children 6–23 months old. This research is part of a larger trial assessing the impact of nutrition education combined or not with the provision of complementary foods on child nutritional status. The “Opportunistic Observation Form” from the Process for the Promotion of Child Feeding package was used to collect data on RF through direct observations of child's meal episodes. Data were used to define an initial scale composed of four constructs and 15 indicators. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and Hancock and Mueller's H reliability indices were computed to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. The final tool was applied to baseline and endline data. At baseline, the sample included 243 pairs and, at endline, 248 pairs. The final scale included two latent constructs (RF and active feeding) that comprise three indicators for active feeding and five for RF. Criteria for fit indices of CFA were met for both constructs though better at baseline. Reliability coefficients were above 0.80 for each construct at baseline and endline. This research proposes a scale that could be used to assess active feeding and RF. Further validation is warranted in different contexts.     

Predicting developmental outcomes in very preterm infants: validity of a neonatal neurobehavioral assessment

Aim: This study explored inter‐rater reliability, discriminative, construct and predictive validity of the Neurobehavioral Assessment of the Preterm Infant (NAPI) in a gestational‐age‐based cohort. Methods: The NAPI was conducted at 35 weeks post‐menstrual age for 170 infants born <32 weeks. Cognitive and motor development was assessed at 2 years using the Mental Development Index (MDI) and Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) of Bayley Scales of Infant Development‐II for 159 infants. Results: Only NAPI motor and irritability scores were significantly different between very (29–3 w) and extremely preterm (<28 w) infants. Results regarding construct validity were variable: there were weak correlations between NAPI motor scores and gestational age (r = ?0.23; p = 0.003), days in NICU (r = ?0.24; p = 0.001); NAPI alertness scores and days in NICU (r = ?0.16; p = 0.037); and NAPI irritability scores and gestational age (r = 0.21; p = 0.006). There were no significant associations with other markers of adverse outcome. Only NAPI irritability scores were correlated with MDI scores (r = ?0.16; p = 0.040) but accounted for little additional variance after adjustment for neonatal factors (ΔR² = 0.035; p = 0.012). Conclusion: We found little evidence of the utility of the NAPI as a measure of short‐term neurobehavioural function or for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants. It may have greater predictive power when used serially to detect delayed neurobehavioural maturation.     

Validity and reliability of the Behavioural Observational Pain Scale for postoperative pain measurement in children 1-7 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: Pain measurement is a necessity in pain treatment but can be difficult in young children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Behavioural Observational Pain Scale (BOPS) as a postoperative pain measurement scale for children aged 1-7 yrs. The scale assesses three elements of pain behaviors: facial expression, verbalization, and body position. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A day surgery care unit for children and a neurosurgical postoperative care unit. PATIENTS: Seventy-six children aged 1-7 yrs (4.5 +/- 1.8) undergoing elective surgical procedures were observed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study was divided into interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. The interrater reliabilities of the observers were very good with a high agreement between the different nurses' BOPS scores. Each item of the BOPS scale ranged from kappa(w) 0.86 to 0.95. In the concurrent validity, BOPS and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores had a positive correlation indicating that both tools described similar behaviors (r(s) = .871, p < .001). In construct validity, the effect of analgesic was tested before analgesic administration and at 15, 30, and 60 mins after analgesic administration. The differences in BOPS score between the time intervals were significant (p < .01) before administration of analgesia and at 15, 30, and 60 mins. There was also statistical significance in the BOPS score (p < .01) between 15 and 60 mins after administration of analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: With BOPS, the caretaker can evaluate and document pain with high reliability and validity and thereby improve postoperative pain treatment in preschool children. The simple scoring system makes BOPS easy to incorporate in a postoperative unit.     

Postsurgery analgesic and sedative drug use in a French neonatal intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Objective

To describe pain assessment, the pattern of analgesic and sedative drug use, and adverse drug reactions in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during the postsurgery phase.

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score.

AIMS: To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting. METHODS: A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0-16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool. The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score. RESULTS: A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.     

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score

Aims: To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting. Methods: A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0–16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool.¹ The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse''s triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse''s score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse''s AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score. Results: A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree. Conclusions: Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.     

Multicentric study on neonatal medical pain management in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais]

The aim of this study was to describe pain management for newborn infants in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal units in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to the 52 physicians practising in the six neonatal intensive care units and six neonatal units. The questions were in reference to pain assessment, treatment and prevention. RESULTS: Forty questionnaires were completed (77%). Eleven units proclaimed an interest in neonatal pain management. The tool for assessing pain was the EDIN scale (Echelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-né, neonatal pain and discomfort scale). Analgesic treatment was administered in 100% of cases for the insertion of chest tube, in 92% of cases for the insertion of percutaneous central catheter in a ventilated newborn infant and in 91% of cases for necrotizing enterocolitis requiring a mechanical ventilation. Prescribed analgesic drugs were propacetamol, nalbuphin or fentanyl; a sedation by midazolam or diazepam was occasionally associated. Emla cream was used before lumbar puncture in 80% of cases in the neonatal intensive care units and in 92% of cases in the neonatal units. Three neonatal intensive care units and four neonatal units administered a sucrose solution for blood samples. CONCLUSION: At the time of study, the interest in the pain of the physicians working in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal units was inadequate to guarantee an optimum management of pain in newborn infants. Physicians' approach remained heterogeneous.     

HEDEN Pain Scale: A Shortened Behavioral Scale for Assessment of Prolonged Cancer or Postsurgical Pain in Children Aged 2 to 6 Years

Few observational scales are available for assessing chronic or recurrent pain in children with cancer because overt behavioral signs of chronic pain dissipate as time passes, making them difficult to detect reliably. The Douleur Enfant Gustave Roussy (DEGR) scale developed by Gauvain-Piquard to monitor prolonged pain in children with cancer aged 2–6 years is currently the only validated tool available for this purpose, but is time consuming and difficult to use in daily clinical practice. To shorten composite measurement scales, we developed the Hétero Evaluation Douleur Enfant (HEDEN) scale from the DEGR scale. We present here the process and validation of this scale. Expert consensus was used for the elaboration of HEDEN: 5/10 DEGR items were chosen with three rating levels. Concurrent validity was tested in a first cohort with correlation analysis between HEDEN and DEGR. The HEDEN scale was then validated in a second cohort. In the first step, the study (59 children) showed acceptable correlation between DEGR and HEDEN (r = 0.5), with good reliability (α = 0.61), and interrater agreement (r = 0.62). Subsequent validation in 48 children showed a significant correlation between DEGR and HEDEN (r = 0.6). Reliability was good (α = 0.75), with excellent interrater agreement [r = 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48–0.79)]. On average, the evaluation took 23 minutes (SD = 10.4) for DEGR versus 4.42 minutes (SD = 5.9) for HEDEN. This study shows a good correlation between HEDEN and DEGR scales. HEDEN allows accurate assessment of prolonged pain in young children with cancer.     

Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛量表在0至5岁急性发热儿童舒适度评估的效果

目的 研究Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛量表（Wong-Baker量表）评价0至5岁急性发热儿童舒适度的效果。方法 对体温≥37.5℃且病程≤7 d的0至5岁儿童,非睡眠情况下观察2 h后,在父母或抚育者在场的情况下,先后行Wong-Baker量表和中文版新生儿疼痛与不适量表（EDIN）评估发热患儿的舒适度,对2个量表舒适度评价的一致性行Spearman's相关性分析。结果 97例住院发热患儿进入本文分析,男56例,年龄≤1岁31例,~3岁49例,~5岁17例;体温≤38.0℃ 35例,~39.0℃ 49例,≥39.0℃ 13例;感染性疾病43例（44.3%）,呼吸系统疾病25例（25.8%）,发热待诊21例（21.6%）,血液系统疾病7例,消化系统疾病1例。Wong-Baker量表评估发热患儿均感受到疼痛,有点痛和轻微疼痛29.9%,不同性别、年龄对疼痛明显、疼痛严重和疼痛剧烈的感受较一致,且随着体温的升高对不同程度的疼痛感受越来越明显。中文版EDIN评估发热患儿90%以上表现为不适;在不同性别、年龄1~3分状态感受较一致,随着体温的升高,睡眠质量好、与研究人员接触友好和较容易安抚的患儿在减少。Wong-Baker量表和中文版EDIN Spearman's相关系数为0.742（P<0.001）,呈显著正相关,且不受患儿性别、年龄和体温等影响。结论 Wong-Baker量表对评价0至5岁急性发热儿童舒适度和中文版EDIN具有一致性。     

Vulnerable Baby Scale: development and piloting of a questionnaire to measure maternal perceptions of their baby's vulnerability

OBJECTIVES: To develop and provide initial data to validate a contemporary measure of maternal perceptions of infant vulnerability. METHODS: Questions that address current concerns of mothers regarding their young children (such as the risk of sudden infant death syndrome) were added to an existing Vulnerable Child Questionnaire. Questions not relevant to either current concerns or to young infants were removed. The modified questionnaire, along with standard measures of maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms, were administered to mothers of 39 healthy full-term babies, 17 mothers of 'medically fragile' babies and 19 mothers of jaundiced babies. Babies were approximately 12 weeks of age at the time of completion of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Three questions were removed from the questionnaire on the basis of poor item-total correlations, leaving the final version with 10 questions, scored on 1-5 rating scales. Cronbach alpha for the revised scale was 0.7. There was a significant difference (P = 0.002) in mean vulnerable baby scores between the control group and the 'medically fragile' group. There was a moderately strong correlation between vulnerable baby score and maternal state anxiety (r = 0.6) and a weaker correlation with maternal depressive symptoms (r = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The modified questionnaire has good internal consistency. The difference in mean scores between the three groups, and correlations with maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms, lend construct validity to the scale. The Vulnerable Baby Scale appears to be suitable for assessing maternal perceptions of the vulnerability of their young babies in clinical and research settings although further research, with larger samples, may be necessary to fully establish the scale's psychometric properties.     

Development of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale

Background: The present study reports the development and application of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale (AHEMD‐IS), a parental self‐report designed to assess the quantity and quality of affordances in the home environment that are conducive to motor development for infants aged 3–18 months. Methods: Steps in its development included use of expert feedback, establishment of construct validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and predictive validity. With all phases of the project, 113 homes were involved. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater and intrarater reliability for the total score were 1 and 0.94, respectively. In addition, results indicate that the test has the characteristic of differentiating a wide range of scores. Regression analysis for the AHEMD‐IS and motor development using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale supports preliminary evidence for predictive validity. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the AHEMD‐IS has sufficient reliability and validity as an instrument for assessing affordances in the home environment, with clinical and research applications.     

Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Non‐Communicating Children’s Pain Checklist – Postoperative Version

Aim: To test the validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Non‐Communicating Children’s Pain Checklist – Postoperative Version (NCCPC‐PV). Methods: Thirty‐two consecutive children/adolescents (2–20 years of age) with cognitive impairment and no verbal communication from four habilitation centres were admitted to the study. Each child’s behaviour was observed by a parent or a caregiver and by a physiotherapist in two calm and two painful situations within the child’s everyday life. The raters independently assessed and graded the child’s behaviour during 5 min according to the translated Swedish version of the NCCPC‐PV. The intrarater and interrater reliability were determined, and the construct validity was examined. Results: The results from 202 assessments showed that the construct validity was good: children’s behavioural signs differed significantly between situations of pain and situations of calm (p < 0.001). Repeated assessments showed poor agreement both within and between raters [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.51–0.65]. The agreement for pain was good (ICC 0.83). Conclusion: The Swedish version of the NCCPC‐PV can be used for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairments who lack verbal communication. Aspects of reliability need to be further analysed.     

Assessing pain in ventilated newborns and infants: validation of the Hartwig score

The Hartwig score was designed to assess pain in ventilated newborns and infants. It comprises the acceptance of mechanical ventilation and the reaction to endotracheal suctioning (grimacing, gross motor movements, eye-opening). The aim of this study was to validate the Hartwig score in terms of concurrent validity, internal consistency, inter-rater correlation and to define a cut-off value with respect to the need for analgesic therapy. Fifty-four video recordings of 28 ventilated newborns and infants up to 10 months old during endotracheal suctioning were assessed by two neonatologists and two nurses using the Hartwig score, Comfort scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in respect to pain. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 12.0. Comparison of the Hartwig score with the VAS resp. Comfort scale, as according to Bland–Altman, gave a mean of the differences of 0.77 resp. 0.15. A cut-off value of 12.1 to discriminate pain requiring treatment had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 100%. Cronbach's alpha of item correlation of the total score was 0.872, deleting the weakest item improved internal consistency to 0.895. Inter-rater correlation was found to be 0.934. Conclusion The Hartwig score showed satisfactory agreement with the VAS and good agreement with the Comfort scale. It is a reliable tool for assessing pain in ventilated newborns and infants. The cut-off value was found to be at 13 points.     

The pain of the newborn: between reality and perception]

A newborn hospitalized in neonatology suffers a lot of painful and fully perceived procedures. However this pain is not enough taken into consideration. There are various reasons for this failure. The objective of our study was to analyze the perception of 3 groups of participants (parents, nurses and doctors) about newborns'pain. We wanted to compare these perceptions with pain scales (EDIN and BBdol scale) and to study their connection with newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores (SNAP and CRIB). POPULATION AND METHOD: We have led a prospective study involving 80 newborns. Questionnaires assessing, with the help of a visual analogic scale, the pains' perception and the efficiency of the treatment of this pain were given to the 3 groups of participants. RESULTS: Parents assessed that their newborn feels an important pain (median: 5/10), that was not correlated with pain scales. Nurses and doctors assessed a lower level of pain (median: 2/10), greatly correlated with the pain scales. Parents assessed that the treatment of pain was better when the newborn was severely ill. The nurses, and even more the doctors, assessed the opposite effect. The nurses appeared to hold an intermediate position between parents and doctors. Nurses underlined moreover some lack of communication of the doctors about the newborns' pain. This communication problem is a major hindrance to the adequate treatment of pain.