Interference of oral poliovirus vaccine on RIT 4237 oral rotavirus vaccine

A vaccination trial, performed on 86 3-month-old infants, has shown that the ability of the RIT 4237 live attenuated rotavirus strain to induce seroconversion is dramatically reduced when administered with live poliovirus vaccine. In a subsequent trial performed on 93 infants the attempt to overcome the poliovirus interference by administering two doses of associated vaccines was unsuccessful. No interference by the RIT 4237 strain on live attenuated polioviruses was observed.     

Immunogenicity and safety profile of a primary dose of bivalent oral polio vaccine given simultaneously with DTwP-Hb-Hib and inactivated poliovirus vaccine at the 4th visit in Indonesian infants

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the immunological protectivity of infants following four doses of bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV; Bio Farma), which were given simultaneously with DTwP-Hb-Hib (Pentabio®), along with one dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at the fourth visit. A total of 143 newborn infants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled and completed the study. Subjects received the first dose of bOPV at birth. On days 60, 90 and 120, bOPV was given simultaneously with Pentabio®. On day 120, one dose of IPV was also administered. Serum samples for serology analysis were collected before the first dose of bOPV (at day 0), before the second dose of bOPV (at day 60) and 30 days after the last dose of bOPV. In addition, the intensity, duration and relationship of each adverse event to the trial vaccines were assessed. Seroprotection rates after the fourth dose of bOPV were 100%, 91.6% and 99.3% for poliovirus P1, P2 and P3, respectively. Seroconversion rates after the fourth dose of bOPV were 100.0%, 93.3% and 100% for poliovirus P1, P2 and P3, respectively. There were no severe adverse events, and systemic reactions were generally mild during the 1–28 day post-vaccination period. Collectively, our findings indicate that bOPV given simultaneously with Pentabio® and one dose of IPV at the 4th visit was immunogenic and well tolerated.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of changing from live oral poliovirus vaccine to inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Australia

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the economic impact of introducing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) into the Australian childhood immunisation schedule to eliminate vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of two different four-dose IPV schedules (monovalent vaccine and IPV-containing combination vaccine) compared with the current four-dose oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) schedule for Australian children through age six years. Model used estimates of VAPP incidence, costs, and vaccine utilisation and price obtained from published and unpublished sources. Main outcome measures were total costs, outcomes prevented, and incremental cost-effectiveness, expressed as net cost per case of VAPP prevented. RESULTS: Changing to an IPV-based schedule would prevent 0.395 VAPP cases annually. At $20 per dose for monovalent vaccine and $14 per dose for the IPV component in a combination vaccine, the change would incur incremental, annual costs of $19.5 million ($49.3 million per VAPP case prevented) and $6.7 million ($17.0 million per VAPP case prevented), respectively. Threshold analysis identified break-even prices per dose of $1 for monovalent and $7 for combination vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing IPV into the Australian childhood immunisation schedule is not likely to be cost-effective unless it comes in a combined vaccine with the IPV-component price below $10. IMPLICATIONS: More precise estimates of VAPP incidence in Australia and IPV price are needed. However, poor cost-effectiveness will make the decision about switching from OPV to IPV in the childhood schedule difficult.     

Immunogenicity of four doses of oral poliovirus vaccine when co-administered with the human neonatal rotavirus vaccine (RV3-BB)

BackgroundThe RV3-BB human neonatal rotavirus vaccine was developed to provide protection from severe rotavirus disease from birth. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for mutual interference in the immunogenicity of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and RV3-BB.MethodsA randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 1649 participants was conducted from January 2013 to July 2016 in Central Java and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Participants received three doses of oral RV3-BB, with the first dose given at 0–5 days (neonatal schedule) or ~8 weeks (infant schedule), or placebo. Two sub-studies assessed the immunogenicity of RV3-BB when co-administered with either trivalent OPV (OPV group, n = 282) or inactivated polio vaccine (IPV group, n = 333). Serum samples were tested for antibodies to poliovirus strains 1, 2 and 3 by neutralization assays following doses 1 and 4 of OPV.ResultsSero-protective rates to poliovirus type 1, 2 or 3 were similar (range 0.96–1.00) after four doses of OPV co-administered with RV3-BB compared with placebo. Serum IgA responses to RV3-BB were similar when co-administered with either OPV or IPV (difference in proportions OPV vs IPV: sIgA responses; neonatal schedule 0.01, 95% CI −0.12 to 0.14; p = 0.847; infant schedule −0.10, 95% CI −0.21 to −0.001; p = 0.046: sIgA GMT ratio: neonatal schedule 1.23, 95% CI 0.71–2.14, p = 0.463 or infant schedule 1.20, 95% CI 0.74–1.96, p = 0.448).ConclusionsThe co-administration of OPV with RV3-BB rotavirus vaccine in a birth dose strategy did not reduce the immunogenicity of either vaccine. These findings support the use of a neonatal RV3-BB vaccine where either OPV or IPV is used in the routine vaccination schedule.     

Immunogenicity and safety of sabin-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine replacing salk-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine: An innovative application of different strain-IPVs replacement

BackgroundA domestic Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Sabin IPV) was approved by China Food and Drug Administration in 2017 as a replacement for the Salk strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Salk IPV) that has been in use in China for over 10 years. The present post-marketing trial was implemented in China to assess the immunogenicity and safety of replacing the Salk IPV with the Sabin IPV in the last two immunizations of the standard three-dose schedule.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial with two groups that received three doses of IPVs at the age of 2, 3, and 4 months: the Salk-Sabin-Sabin group and the Salk-Salk-Salk group. Blood samples were collected before vaccination and 30–40 days after the third dose of vaccination. The seroconversion rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) were calculated and analyzed to evaluate immunogenicity. The safety of both immunization schedules was also monitored and analyzed.ResultsOf 360 recruited healthy infants, all three IPV doses were administered and blood collection was completed in 330 infants. All participants (100%) in both groups were seropositive for all three poliovirus types after the last vaccination. There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.001) in the GMTs for antibodies against poliovirus types 1 and 2, but no significant difference was observed for antibodies against type 3 (P = 0.009). A non-inferiority t-test showed that the post-immunization GMTs for all three types in the Salk-Sabin-Sabin group were not inferior to those in the Salk-Salk-Salk group (P < 0.001). Safety assessment indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of all adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.806).ConclusionsThe Salk-Sabin-Sabin IPV immunization schedule is not inferior to the Salk-Salk-Salk IPV schedule in terms of both immunogenicity and safety.Clinical trial number: NCT04051736.     

Immunogenicity of a hexavalent combination vaccine in rhesus monkeys

Preclinical immunogenicity studies were conducted in rhesus monkeys to determine whether there is immune interference in the response to one or more components of a hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac) that contains antigens from Haemophilus influenzae (Hib), hepatitis B (HB), diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), acellular pertussis (aP) and inactivated polio virus (IPV). Antibody responses were measured following co-administration of the components at three separate anatomical sites or administration as a hexavalent combination in a single site. After three injections of the hexavalent vaccine, the peak antibody responses to each component of the vaccine were >100-fold above pre-immune titers and persisted at levels >10-fold above pre-immune titers at approximately 1 year. Immune interference was observed in the peak response to HB, D and pertussis toxin, but was not seen at later time points. The results indicate that the rhesus monkey model may be useful for pre-clinical evaluation of combination vaccines.     

脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗和减毒活疫苗不同序贯免疫程序基础免疫安全性观察

目的 评价脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗(inactivated polio vaccine,IPV)和减毒活疫苗(oralpolio vaccine,OPV)不同序贯免疫程序基础免疫的安全性.方法 2009至2011年在北京市选择2月龄(60～89 d)婴儿,分为1剂IPV和2剂OPV序贯(I-O-O)、2剂IPV和1剂OPV序贯(I-I-O)、IPV全程(I-I-I)、OPV全程(O-O-O)4个观察组,分别在2、3、4月龄时接种疫苗,收集每次接种后全身和局部不良反应发生情况,计算不良反应发生率.最终入组553名婴儿,中途退出89名,观察1492人次.结果 I-O-O组、I-I-O组、I-I-I组和O-O-O组总不良反应发生率分别为22.9％ (94/410)、18.4％(60/327)、22.0％(78/354)和17.7％(71/401),差异无统计学意义(x2=4.84,P=0.184).第1剂不良反应发生率最高[22.7％(32/141) ～35.3％(54/153)],第2、3剂依次降低.没有与接种疫苗有关的严重不良事件报告.I-O-O组、I-I-O组、I-I-I组和O-O-O组全身不良反应发生率分别为21.5％(88/410)、17.7％(58/327)、20.1％ (71/354)和17.7％(71/401),差异无统计学意义(x2 =2.53,P=0.472).异常哭闹在各组中发生率最高[7.2％(29/401) ～11.3％(37/327)],异常哭闹、嗜睡和易激惹观察到极少数重度不良反应,其他不良反应均为轻、中度反应.I-O-O组、I-I-O组和I-I-I组局部压痛、硬结和红肿发生率分别为2.2％(5/229) ～5.6％(22/393)、0～0.9％(2/229)、0～ 1.0％(4/393),均以轻度为主[0 ～4.1％(5/12t)].结论 IPV全程及IPV/OPV序贯免疫程序与口服三剂OPV-样具有较好的安全性.     

Serological response and poliovirus excretion following different combined oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines immunization schedules

A controlled study was conducted in Karachi, Pakistan to compare humoral and mucosal immune responses against polioviruses in infants who received oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) at birth and at 6, 10, and 14 weeks according to the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) with infants who received either three doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 6, 10, and 14 weeks together with OPV or one additional dose of IPV at 14 weeks together, with the last dose of OPV. A total of 1429 infants were enrolled; 24-week serum specimens were available for 898 infants (63%). They all received a challenge dose of OPV type 3 at 24 weeks of age. The addition of three doses of IPV to three doses of OPV induced a significantly higher percentage of seropositive children at 24 weeks of age for polio 1 (97% versus 89%, P<0.001) and polio 3 (98% versus 92%) compared to the EPI schedule. However, the one supplemental dose of IPV at 14 weeks did not increase the serological response at 24 weeks. Intestinal immunity against the challenge dose was similar in the three groups. Combined schedules of OPV and IPV in the form of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus-IPV vaccine (DPT-IPV) may be useful to accelerate eradication of polio in developing countries.     

Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 oral suspension (liquid formulation) in Finnish infants

The lyophilized formulation of a human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™ (RIX4414) is highly immunogenic. In order to comply with the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation, a liquid formulation of the vaccine that does not require reconstitution was developed. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the liquid formulation were compared with lyophilized formulation in two Finnish studies.In Study A infants aged 6-12 weeks received two doses of the lyophilized or liquid formulation of the vaccine or placebo following a 0,1 month schedule. In Study B, infants aged 10-17 weeks received two doses of either liquid or lyophilized formulation of the vaccine. In both studies, anti-rotavirus IgA antibodies were assessed pre-vaccination and one month post-Dose 2. In Study A, the anti-rotavirus seroconversion rate was 90% (95% CI: 81.2-95.6%) and 83.7% (95% CI: 74.2-90.8%) in the groups that received the liquid and the lyophilized formulation of RIX4414, respectively; the respective anti-rotavirus IgA seroconversion rates in Study B were 88.6% (95% CI: 86.1-90.8%) and 90.5% (95% CI: 86.2-93.8%). Reactogenicity and safety profiles of the two vaccine formulations were similar.Liquid formulation of the rotavirus vaccine allows greater flexibility in supply and reduces logistical costs.     

不同序贯程序的脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗和减毒活疫苗的免疫效果研究

目的 评价脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗（IPV）和减毒活疫苗（OPV）不同序贯免疫程序的免疫效果。方法 选取月龄≥2月的婴儿,分为1剂IPV和2剂OPV序贯组(I - O - O组)、2剂IPV和1剂OPV序贯组(I - I - O组)、IPV全程(I - I - I组)和OPV全程组(O - O - O),分别在2、3、4月龄时各接种1针,检测并比较各组人群血清中脊髓灰质炎中和抗体几何平均滴度（GMT）及抗体阳转率。结果 在完成基础免疫后,I - O - O 组Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ型抗体GMT分别为948.78、930.91、955.08;I - I - O组抗体GMT分别为909.43、1 202.34、1 102.83;I - I - I 组GMT分别为333.02、298.56、411.98,O - O - O组抗体GMT分别为814.42、778.27、658.52;差异均有统计学意义;各组3个型别的抗体阳转率均为98％~100％,差异无统计学意义。接种1针IPV后脊髓灰质炎Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型中和抗体GMT分别为21.77、30.89、26.46,抗体阳转率分别为84.1％、91.5％、91.5％;接种第2剂IPV后,Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型中和抗体GMT分别69.42、133.89、212.58,抗体阳转率分别为100.0％、100.0％、99.9％。结论 IPV与OPV序贯接种后,对象产生的脊髓灰质炎中和抗体GMT比单独接种3剂IPV或3剂OPV高;不同序贯程序中,接种2剂IPV后抗体保护率较高。为了使机体产生更高的抗体水平并且避免疫苗相关麻痹病例发生,可采用IPV与OPV序贯程序,并以2剂IPV和1剂OPV的序贯程序为佳。     

Immunogenicity and safety of a low-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis combination vaccine with either inactivated or oral polio vaccine as a pre-school booster in UK children

This open, randomised controlled trial studied the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two combined low-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines (Td5aP-IPV, REPEVAX, Aventis Pasteur MSD; and Td5aP, COVAXIS, Aventis Pasteur MSD + OPV, GlaxoSmithKline) in comparison with a standard dose diphtheria pre-school booster vaccine (DT2aP-IPV, TETRAVAC, Aventis Pasteur MSD) in a population of 3.5-5-year-old children administered concomitantly with measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (M-M-R II, Aventis Pasteur MSD). A linked sub-study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Td5aP-IPV in a population of younger children, aged 3-3.5 years. This study demonstrated non-inferiority of seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus for the study vaccines and comparable immunogenicity for pertussis and polio components of the vaccines. Reactogenicity was similar for all three vaccines. The study vaccines containing low-dose diphtheria antigen (Td5aP-IPV and Td5aP + OPV) are immunogenic and have acceptable reactogenicity for use as a pre-school booster vaccine administered concomitantly with MMR.     

Immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine administered in mass campaigns versus routine immunization programmes.

Reported are the results of a study to investigate the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) when administered in mass campaigns compared with that following routine immunization programmes. For this purpose, paired sera were collected from a cohort of children before and after a mass vaccination with OPV in Morocco in 1987. Serum samples and information on vaccination status and other confounding factors that could influence antibody responses to OPV were collected. Neutralizing antibody titres to poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 were determined using a standardized assay. OPV doses administered exclusively during the mass campaign were consistently associated with higher type-specific seroprevalence rates than the same number of doses administered in the routine programme. These findings could not be attributed to differences in confounding factors. Enhanced secondary spread of vaccine virus may have occurred but could not be demonstrated because of limitations in the study design. Mass campaigns appear to be highly effective in raising the dose-related poliovirus type-specific immunity of the population above that achieved by the routine immunization programme. Our findings support the continued use of mass campaigns as an adjunct to routine programmes in order to both enhance and catalyse current efforts to achieve the global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000.     

Serological and virological assessment of oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines in a rural population in Kenya.

A study was carried out in a rural community in Kenya to compare the humoral and intestinal immunity provided by three doses of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and two or three doses of enhanced-potency inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). The immunization series was started at 8-12 weeks of age and the interval between doses was 2 months. In children with low levels of maternal antibodies (i.e., those most at risk), the first dose of either vaccine stimulated antibody response. Children with high levels of maternal antibodies responded to the first dose of OPV, but not to that of IPV. Subsequent doses led to increases in the mean antibody titres with both vaccines. After three doses of OPV, the proportion of children with antibody titres of greater than or equal to 1:8 was 92% for type 1 virus, 98% for type 2, and 90% for type 3. After two doses of IPV the proportion of children with antibody titres of greater than or equal to 1:8 was 94%, 88%, and 97% for type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively; after three doses of IPV, 100% of children had antibodies greater than or equal to 1:8 for types 1 and 3, and 98% for type 2. Intestinal immunity was tested with a challenge dose of type 1 OPV, but the dose used was too small to detect a significant difference between the vaccines.     

Co-administration study in South African infants of a live-attenuated oral human rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) and poliovirus vaccines

A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial (e-Track 444563-014/NCT00346892) was conducted in South Africa to evaluate the co-administration of RIX4414 (live-attenuated human G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) administered simultaneously. Healthy infants (n=450) were randomized into three groups (RIX4414+OPV, RIX4414+IPV or Placebo+OPV) to receive two oral doses of RIX4414/placebo with OPV or IPV using two vaccination schedules (6-10 weeks and 10-14 weeks). Serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibodies (ELISA) and neutralizing antibodies (micro-neutralization assay) to poliovirus serotypes 1, 2 and 3 were measured. Co-administration of RIX4414 with OPV did not result in a decrease in the high sero-protection rates against poliovirus serotypes 1, 2 and 3 detected after the third OPV dose (98-100%). The anti-rotavirus IgA antibody sero-conversion rates were higher for the 10-14 weeks schedule (55-61%) compared to the 6-10 weeks schedule (36-43%). Solicited symptoms were reported at similar rates between RIX4414 and placebo groups and no serious adverse events related to RIX4414 were reported. This study provided evidence that RIX4414 can be co-administered with routine EPI immunizations including OPV and that two doses of RIX4414 were well tolerated and immunogenic in South African infants.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis toxoids combined with inactivated polio vaccine, when administered concomitantly with or as a diluent for a Hib conjugate vaccine

In an open trial, 400 infants were randomized to vaccination with a combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP-IPV) either mixed with a Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) tetanus toxoid conjugate immediately before injection (DTaP-IPV/Hib (mix)) or given concurrently with the Hib conjugate at separate injection sites (DTaP-IPV+Hib (sep)). The pertussis component consisted of pertussis toxoid alone. The vaccines were given intramuscularly at 3, 5 and 12 months of age. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Local reactions were evaluated from diary cards completed by the parents. Infants who received DTaP-IPV/Hib (mix) experienced fewer local reactions. Sera were obtained 28-45 days after the second and third vaccinations. Total Hib capsular antibodies were similar in the two groups after the second injection but lower in the group receiving DTaP-IPV/Hib (mix) than in the group receiving DTaP-IPV+Hib (sep) after the third injection (geometric mean 6.1 vs 10.4 microg/ml). Mixing of the vaccines also led to somewhat lower diphtheria toxin antibodies (5.9 vs. 7.7 IU/ml after the third injection) while tetanus antibodies were higher (3.9 vs. 2.5 IU/ml after the third injection). Antibodies against pertussis toxin and the three polio virus types were similar in the two groups. The moderate impairment of the Hib antibody response caused by mixing of the Hib conjugate with aluminium adsorbed DTaP may be due to physicochemical interference but is probably of little clinical importance because of the ability of the Hib conjugates to induce an immunologic memory.     

Efficacy of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in India

The immunogenic efficacy of inactivated (Salk) poliovirus vaccine (IPV) was evaluated in infants in India, in view of the high frequency of vaccine failure after immunization with oral (Sabin) poliovirus vaccine (OPV). A total of 150 infants, aged 6-45 weeks, were given 3 doses of IPV, with intervals of 4 or 8 weeks between doses. The effect on the antibody response of child''s age, presence of maternal antibody before immunization, and interval between doses was assessed. The overall seroconversion rates to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were 99%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. Seroconversion rates to types 2 and 3, and antibody titres to types 1 and 2, were higher (i) in infants given vaccine doses at 8-week intervals and (ii) in those without detectable maternal antibody. The seroconversion rates in infants without maternal antibody, who were given IPV at 8-week intervals, were 100%, 100%, and 96.2% to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thus the immunogenic efficacy of IPV was found to be satisfactory.