腹腔镜手术治疗腹壁切口疝现状和趋势

腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的医源性并发症之一,发病率约为3%～29%[1]。切口疝不能自愈,均需要手术治疗。手术方法有单纯缝合修补和无张力修补两种,随着腔镜技术的发展,这两种术式均能在腹腔镜下完成。腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术(laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair,LVHR)最早报道于1993年。本文就目前开展的现状以及一些热点问题进行讨论。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果.方法 回顾性分析41例腹壁切口疝行腹腔镜下补片修补术患者的临床资料.结果 38例均顺利完成手术, 3例中转开腹.手术时间 78～186 min,平均 95 min.术后疼痛轻微,术后排便、排气时间 25～41 h,平均 32 h.术后第 2 d进食.术后住院 5～7 d,平均 6 d.41例随访 6～16个月,平均 9个月,未见疝复发.结论 腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,值得临床推广应用.     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

腹壁巨大切口疝的外科治疗

腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症，发生率约占2％～11％，其发生与切口类型、缝合材料与技术、切口感染、肥胖、营养不良、高龄、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾患等局部和全身因素有关。。而疝环直径≥10cm的巨大切口疝（abdominal giant incisional hernia，AGIH）因常伴有肥胖或全身营养状态差，并且具有病情加重和复发的趋势，治疗起来相当棘手，在行疝修补后复发率可高达30％～50％，给患带来很大的痛苦。本对巨大切口疝的外科治疗作一综述。     

腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究

目的探讨腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术（IPOM）治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及可行性。 方法回顾性分析2014-2019年中国人民解放军南部战区总医院对103例腹壁切口疝患者实施腹腔镜下IPOM的临床资料,观察其手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、并发症及复发情况。 结果103例患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间、术后排气时间及术后住院时间分别为（100±10）min、（40±8）h及（7.5±1.5）d。术中发现1例合并脐疝同时行脐疝修补,1例合并右侧腹股沟直疝同时行TAPP术,1例嵌顿性肠梗阻并肠坏死同时行肠切除吻合术。术后轻微并发症经短期治疗后痊愈,随访3~24个月,均无切口疝复发。 结论腹腔镜下IPOM治疗腹壁切口疝具有安全、有效、创伤小、可发现隐匿疝、术后康复快、能降低并发症、缩短住院时间、复发率低等优点。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术(附41例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜下采用聚丙烯和膨化聚四氟乙烯复合补片（Bard Composix Mesh）修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法2004年10月～2005年8月，对41例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径3～25cm，宽径3～18cm）腹腔镜下用超声刀进行腹腔内粘连松解和采用强生疝修补用缝合器行补片固定修补术。结果41例均顺利完成，无中转开腹。手术时间60～182min，平均85min。术后疼痛轻微，术后排便、排气时间25～41h，平均32h。术后第2天进食。术后住院5～7d，平均6d。41例随访6～16个月，平均9个月，未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法，值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

改良式腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术六例体会

我院从2002年11月至2004年7月完成了6例改良式腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术。现报告如下。     

腹壁切口疝的外科治疗(附53例临床分析)

目的总结治疗腹壁切口疝的临床经验.方法对1994年4月～2002年8月53例腹壁切口疝患者在年龄、手术方法、引流放置,抗生素应用及预后进行回顾性分析.结果53例患者采用人工合成材料或直接缝合修补.术后切口积液3例,无切口感染.随访时间3月～5年,治愈46例,复发7例.结论腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症之一,尤其是老年患者.合理使用人工合成材料及直接缝合修补法适可以获得良好的治疗效果.     

比较腹腔镜腹腔内与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果

目的比较腹腔镜腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2019-01间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受疝修补术治疗的76例腹壁切口疝患者,将36例行腹腔镜IPOM术的患者作为腔镜组。将40例行开放Sublay术的患者作为开放组。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果2组患者均成功完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量、术后肠蠕动恢复时间及住院时间均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腔镜组术后近期疼痛发生率低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜IPOM术具有创伤小、恢复快、疼痛轻、出血少、并发症少等优点,具有更广阔的应用前景。     

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Background Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery have made various abdominal surgeries possible. To avoid wound infection, mesh repair of abdominal incisional hernias is performed laparoscopically. Here we present a new procedure to fix mesh to the abdominal wall. Surgical technique Four anchoring sutures are made using a suture-grasping device; the additional transabdominal sutures are then made with a modified double-needle device. Additional circumferential fixation with tacks is not necessary. Conclusions This new mesh fixation method involves simple suturing techniques and is less time consuming than the conventional procedure.     

Laparoscopic incisional lumbar hernia repair

Purpose  Incisional lumbar hernia is an uncommon hernia type. Open surgical procedures have significant postoperative morbidity and patient dissatisfaction, therefore, for the repair of seven incisional lumbar hernias, we attempted using an intraperitoneal laparoscopic technique that was described to have good short-term results and decreased morbidity. Methods  We applied a laparoscopic technique using polypropylene meshes in five patients and composite meshes in two patients to cover the defect, then placed prolene sutures and hernia staples to secure the mesh intraperitoneally. Result  The technique was successful in all patients, and they tolerated the procedure well. All did well after surgery, ambulating and eating a regular diet on postoperative day 1. No postoperative complications developed. At a mean follow-up of 34.1 months (range 17–43 months) none of them had pain, mass, or evidence of recurrence, and furthermore, cosmesis was excellent. Conclusions  We believe that the laparoscopic approach is feasible, safe, and the least invasive choice for repairing difficult hernias such as incisional lumbar hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia

BACKGROUND: In this long-term retrospective study, a laparoscopic technique was used for incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, we performed laparoscopic repairs with prosthetic mesh in 159 patients suffering from incisional hernia. Morbidity factors were noted and operative data were collected. In addition, early and long-term complications and recurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no deaths as a result of the procedure. In 21 patients (13.8%), the operation was converted to an open procedure. Small bowel perforation occurred in three patients (1.9%). Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days. Early complications occurred in 61 patients (44%). The mean follow-up time was 49 months. There were no infections of the prosthetic mesh. Residual abdominal pain was reported in 31 patients (26%). Bowel obstructions requiring resection were found in two patients (1%), and hernia recurrence was observed in 19 patients (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic herniorraphy is a promising technique with all the advantages of minimal-invasive surgery. Nevertheless, close attention needs to be paid to the choice of the hernia and mesh size and to the fixing of the mesh.     

Natural course of incisional hernia and indications for repair

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias and incisional hernia repair can be a significant challenge for both surgeon and patient. Despite the growing amount of literature describing various methods of surgical techniques, little has been published the natural course of an incisional hernia and regarding indications for incisional hernia repair. METHODS: An internet database search was performed to identify articles describing symptoms presented by patients and indications for incisional hernia repair. RESULTS: Various symptoms and indications regarding incisional hernia repair and the natural course of an incisional hernia are mentioned in the literature. Nevertheless, published data accurately describing these symptoms and indications are rare. CONCLUSION: A prospective trial monitoring incisional hernias as well as comparing conservative treatment with repair should be performed.     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

Background Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery, and it is often a source of morbidity and high costs for health care. This is a case-control study to compare laparoscopic versus anterior-open incisional hernia repair. Methods 170 patients with incisional hernia were enrolled in this study between September 2001 and December 2004. Of these, 85 underwent anterior-open repair (open group: OG), and 85 underwent laparoscopic repair (laparoscopic group: LG). The clinical outcome was determined by a median follow-up of 24.0 months for LG and OG. Results No difference was noticed between the two groups in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and incisional hernia diameter. Mean operative time was 61.0 min for LG patients and 150.9 min for OG patients (p < .05). Mean hospitalization was 2.7 days for LG patients and 9.9 days for OG patients (p < .05). Mean return to work was 13 days (range, 6–15 days) in LG patients and 25 days (range, 16–30 days) in OG patients. Complications occurred in 16.4 % of LG patients and 29.4 % of OG patients, with a relapse rate of 2.3% in LG and 1.1% in OG patients. Conclusions Short-term results indicate that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is associated with a shorter operative time and hospitalization, a faster return to work, and a lower incidence of wound infections and major complications compared to the anterior-open procedure. Further studies and longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: To analyze hospital resource utilization for laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair including the postoperative period. METHODS: Prospectively collected administrative data for incisional hernia repairs were examined. A total of 884 incisional hernia repairs were examined for trends in type of approach over time. Starting October 2001, detailed records were available, and examined for operating room (OR) time, cost data, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day postoperative hospital encounters. RESULTS: Of the total, 469 incisional hernias were approached laparoscopically (53%) and 415 open (47%). Laparoscopic repair had shorter LOS (1 +/- 0.2 days vs 2 +/- 0.6 days), longer OR time (149 +/- 4 min vs 89 +/- 4 min), higher supply costs (2,237 dollars +/- 71 dollars vs 664 dollars +/- 113 dollars), slightly lower total hospital cost (6,396 dollars +/- 477 dollars vs 7,197 dollars +/- 1,819 dollars), and slightly more postoperative hospital encounters (15% vs 13%). Use of laparoscopy increased over time (37% in 2000 vs 68% in 2004). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is becoming increasingly popular, and not at increased cost to the health care system.     

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia

Background : Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias was first reported in 1993. Since then, there have been sporadic case reports and small series published about this procedure, but it has not been widely adopted. Newer types of composite prosthetic mesh may reduce the potential problem of bowel adhesion. Methods : Thirty cases of laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs (carried out by two surgeons or their senior registrars) have been retrospectively reviewed and reported in this article. The data were obtained from patient records and subsequent phone surveys. Results : Thirty patients between 29 and 82 years (mean: 58 years) underwent this procedure. There were 14 men and 16 women. The average weight of the patients was 81 kg. The hernias were up to 6 or 7 cm in diameter. Mesh was used in 28 cases (polypropylene in 25 cases, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in two cases and composite mesh in one case). Most meshes were laid intraperitoneally and fixed into position with laparoscopic spiral tacks. Twenty‐nine cases were completed laparoscopically. One operation (3.3%) was converted to an open procedure because of severe bowel adherence to the hernia sac. The mean operating time was 52 min for laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs only. All but two patients tolerated an oral diet within 24 h. The postoperative hospital stay ranged from 0 to 11 days, with 17 patients (57%) staying overnight and eight patients (27%) staying another day. Over 80% of the patients returned to house duties within a week. There was no mortality, and minor complications occurred in four patients (14%). One patient had a small bowel obstruction treated successfully by repeat laparoscopy with division of fibrinous adhesions to polypropylene mesh on day four. Follow up ranged from 1 to 69 months (mean: 12 months). One patient did not attend follow‐up appointments. There were three cases of hernia recurrence (10%). Conclusion : The results suggest that laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias is a safe, effective and technically feasible operation for small‐ to medium‐sized hernias allowing shorter hospital stay, early recovery and resumption of normal activities. However, recurrence rates are comparable to open mesh hernioplasty especially for larger hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernia

The application of laparoscopic principles to ventral or incisional hernia repair has recently been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to open procedures. In this study we analyzed our recent experience with laparoscopic incisional-ventral hernia repair. The outcomes of 75 consecutive patients (January 2002 to July 2006) who underwent laparoscopic repair for incisional-ventral hernia were reviewed. Patient's demographics, hernia parameters, and intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. Of the 75 patients, 44 were females and 31 males. Mean age was 59.1 yrs (range 29-80 yrs). Mean BMI was 25.9 (range 19.4-36.7). Twenty-one patients had primary ventral hernias while 54 patients had an incisional hernia. Fifty-three patients had a single defect and 22 patients multiple defects. In 45 cases the incisional hernia was a primary hernia; in 4 cases it was a first recurrence; in 2 cases a 2nd recurrence; and in 3 cases a 3rd recurrence. The mean defect size was 52,7 cm2 (range 4-432). Laparoscopic hernia repair was successfully performed in 71 cases (94.7%). The mean mesh size was 211 cm2 (range 63-694). Mean operating time was 101 min (range 50-220 min). The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The postoperative morbidity rate was 14%. After a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (range 7-56) the recurrence rate was 7% (5/71). Laparoscopic repair of incisional-ventral hernias seems to be safe and effective. Medium-term outcomes were promising with a relatively low rate of conversion to open surgery, a low complication rate and a low risk of recurrence.