Total paracentesis associated with intravenous albumin management of patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Repeated large-volume paracentesis (4-6 L/day) is an effective and safe therapy of ascites in patients with cirrhosis provided albumin is infused intravenously. To investigate whether ascites can be safely mobilized in only one paracentesis session ("total paracentesis"), 38 cirrhotic patients with tense ascites were treated with total paracentesis plus intravenous albumin (6-8 g/L ascites removed). Standard liver tests and renal function tests, glomerular filtration rate, free water clearance, plasma volume, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone and norepinephrine concentrations were measured before and after treatment. Total paracentesis was effective in mobilizing ascites in all but 1 patient and did not impair any of the parameters studied. The volume of ascitic fluid removed and the duration of the procedure were 10.7 +/- 0.5 L (mean +/- SEM) and 60 +/- 3 min, respectively. Five of the 38 patients (13%) developed complications during the first hospital stay (hepatic encephalopathy and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 2 patients each and culture-negative bacterial peritonitis in 1). No patient developed renal impairment. This complication rate, as well as the clinical course of the disease during follow-up, estimated by the probability of readmission to hospital, causes of readmission, and survival probability after treatment, was similar to that reported in patients treated with repeated large-volume paracentesis. These results indicate that total paracentesis associated with intravenous albumin can be safely performed in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites and suggest that these patients could be treated in a single-day hospitalization regime.     

Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis

It has recently been shown that repeated large-volume paracentesis associated with intravenous albumin infusion is a rapid, effective, and safe therapy of ascites in cirrhosis. To investigate whether intravenous albumin infusion is necessary in the treatment of cirrhotics with large-volume paracentesis, 105 patients with tense ascites were randomly allocated into two groups. Fifty-two patients (group 1) were treated with paracentesis (4-6 L/day until disappearance of ascites) plus intravenous albumin infusion (40 g after each tap), and 53 (group 2) with paracentesis without albumin infusion. After disappearance of ascites, patients were discharged from the hospital with diuretics. Patients developing tense ascites during follow-up were treated according to their initial schedule. Paracentesis was effective in eliminating the ascites in 50 patients from group 1 and in 48 from group 2, with the duration of the hospital stay being approximately 11 days in both groups. Paracentesis plus intravenous albumin did not induce significant changes in standard renal function tests, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone. In contrast, paracentesis without albumin was associated with a significant increase in blood urea nitrogen, a marked elevation in plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration, and a significant reduction in serum sodium concentration. One patient from group 1 and 11 from group 2 developed renal impairment or severe hyponatremia after treatment, or both (chi 2 = 9.19; p less than 0.01). The development of these complications could not be predicted by clinical and laboratory data before treatment. Although the probability of survival after entry into the study was similar in patients from both groups, a multivariate analysis identified the development of hyponatremia or renal impairment, or both, following the first paracentesis treatment and the occurrence of other complications during the first hospitalization (encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe infection) as being the only independent predictors of mortality. These results indicate that intravenous albumin infusion is important in avoiding renal and electrolyte complications and activation of endogenous vasoactive systems in cirrhotics with ascites who are treated with repeated large-volume paracentesis. The development of such complications may impair survival in these patients.     

Dextran-70 versus albumin as plasma expanders in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites treated with total paracentesis. Results of a randomized study.

To investigate whether albumin can be substituted by less expensive plasma expanders in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites treated with total paracentesis, 88 patients (16 with renal failure) submitted to this therapeutic procedure were randomly assigned to receive IV albumin (43 patients) or dextran-70. Both substances were given at a dose of 8 g/L of ascitic fluid removed. Patients were discharged from the hospital with diuretics, and cases developing tense ascites during follow-up were treated according to their initial schedule. Total paracentesis was effective in eliminating the ascites in all but two cases in each group. Neither paracentesis plus IV albumin infusion nor paracentesis plus IV dextran-70 infusion was associated with significant changes in renal and hepatic function or serum electrolytes. The incidence of renal impairment (one case in each group), hyponatremia (three and four cases, respectively), and other complications (hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bacterial infections) after paracentesis, and the clinical course of the disease as estimated by the probability of readmission to hospital during follow-up, causes of readmission, probability of survival, and causes of death were similar in the two groups of patients. The effect of paracentesis on effective intravascular volume was indirectly assessed by measuring plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration before and 2 and 6 days after treatment, the patients being without diuretics. In patients treated with albumin, no significant changes in renin and aldosterone were observed during the entire period of observation. In contrast, both parameters increased significantly on the 6th day of treatment in patients receiving dextran-70. A significant increase in plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration (30% over baseline values) was observed in 51% of patients treated with dextran-70 and in only 15% of those treated with albumin (x2 = 10.4; P = 0.0012). These results indicate that although dextran-70 is less efficacious than albumin in protecting cirrhotic patients treated with total paracentesis from the decrease in effective intravascular volume, it appears to be capable of preventing the renal and electrolyte complications induced by this therapeutic procedure.     

Total paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites and dilutional hyponatremia

OBJECTIVE: The safety of large-volume paracentesis with plasma expander infusion in ascitic cirrhotic patients with advanced liver disease, hyponatremia, or renal failure has not been elucidated. Our aim was to investigate the safety of total paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with ascites and severe hyponatremia. METHODS: Forty-five cirrhotic patients with tense ascites were treated with total paracentesis and infusion of plasma expanders. At inclusion, 20 patients showed severe hyponatremia (serum sodium <130 mEq/L). In the remaining 25 patients, serum sodium was >130 mEq/L (range, 133-146 mEq/L). RESULTS: Plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) were significantly higher in patients with hyponatremia (PRA: 19.7 +/- 5.8 ng/mL/h; PAC: 217 +/- 35 ng/dL) than in those patients without hyponatremia (PRA: 4.9 +/- 1.1 ng/mL/h; PAC: 95 +/- 31 ng/dL), indicating a more severe systemic hemodynamic deterioration. After paracentesis, PRA and PAC increased similarly in both groups of patients. Serum sodium levels remained unchanged after paracentesis in patients with hyponatremia (127 +/- 0.5 to 128 +/- 1.5 mEq/L) and decreased slightly in patients without hyponatremia (137 +/- 1 to 135 +/- 1 mEq/L; p < 0.005). The incidence of complications during the first hospitalization, the probability of readmission for complications of cirrhosis, and the probability of survival at 1 yr were similar in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that therapeutic paracentesis is a safe treatment for tense ascites in cirrhotic patients with severe hyponatremia.     

Atrial natriuretic factor in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Effect of large-volume paracentesis

The plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor in liver cirrhosis can be affected by various factors, such as ascites, renal function, use of diuretics drugs and dietary sodium intake. Moreover, the influence of high intra-abdominal pressure on cardiac atrial natriuretic factor release in patients with tense ascites has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the circulating levels of atrial natriuretic factor and their relationships to plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration, and urinary sodium excretion in 45 cirrhotic patients divided into 4 groups: (a) cirrhotics without ascites; (b) nonazotemic cirrhotics with ascites; (c) cirrhotics with ascites and functional renal failure; and (d) cirrhotics with ascites taking diuretics. In some patients with tense ascites, atrial natriuretic factor was also measured after rapid abdominal relaxation by large volume paracentesis. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor obtained in 13 healthy control subjects after 5 days on a 40-50 mEq sodium daily intake were 22.8 +/- 3.3 pg/ml. Mean plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels were normal in patients without ascites (35.1 +/- 11.4 pg/ml) and in those with ascites taking diuretics (27 +/- 9.2 pg/ml), but elevated in patients with ascites not taking diuretics (59.6 +/- 12 pg/ml) and in those with ascites and functional renal failure (58.5 +/- 16.6 pg/ml). These data show that plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels are elevated only in cirrhotic patients who are ascitic and not taking diuretics. In these patients atrial natriuretic factor levels were directly correlated with urinary sodium excretion, even though sodium balance was positive. This could be the consequence of the contrasting effects of antinatriuretic factors, as suggested by the inverse relationships between atrial natriuretic factor and urinary sodium on the one hand and plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration on the other. Twenty-six patients with tense ascites (12 taking diuretics and 14 not) were treated with rapid large-volume paracentesis (6500 +/- 330 ml of ascitic fluid removed in 168 +/- 16 min). At the end of the procedure, plasma atrial natriuretic factor levels had increased in all patients (from 45.5 +/- 10.1 to 100 +/- 17 pg/ml), whereas plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration had decreased (from 10.3 +/- 1.6 to 7 +/- 1.3 ng/ml/h, and 1160 +/- 197 to 781 +/- 155 pg/ml, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

全腹腔穿刺放液对肝硬化门静脉血流动力学的影响

目的　观察全腹腔穿刺放液静脉输注生理盐水对肝硬化难治性腹水及门静脉血流动力学的影响。方法　将 1 996- 0 1～ 2 0 0 2 - 1 2安徽省明光市中医院肝硬化顽固性腹水患者1 42例 ,随机分为两组。A组 87例 ,予保护肝细胞 ,利尿剂及全腹腔穿刺放腹水 ,将腹水一次放尽 ,同时静脉输注生理盐水按放腹水 1L输生理盐水 1 70mL计。B组 5 5例 ,只给保护肝细胞及利尿剂治疗。结果　腹水总有效率A、B两组各为 67 8% ,2 3 6% ,P <0 0 1。门静脉系血管内径缩小 ,血流速度加快 ,血流量减少 ,门静脉压力下降也以A组明显。无不良反应。结论　全腹腔穿刺放液静脉输注生理盐水可降低门静脉压力 ,在治疗肝硬化顽固性腹水中是安全、有效的。     

Paracentesis with Dextran 70 vs. paracentesis with albumin in cirrhosis with tense ascites : Results of a randomized study

Forty-one patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites were randomized to receive daily paracentesis of 5 liters associated with Dextran 70 as volume expander (6 g for each 1000 ml of ascites removed) (group I = 20 patients) or paracentesis with albumin (6 g for each 1000 ml of ascites) (group II = 21 patients). The basal clinical features, laboratory data, and plasma renin activity were similar in both groups. The volume of ascites removed was 12.9 +/- 4.4 and 10.9 +/- 3.7 liters in group I and II, respectively (n.s.). No significant changes were observed in liver and renal function tests, KPTT, platelet count, factor VIII, serum electrolytes or plasma renin activity 24 and 96 h after the last paracentesis in both groups, except for a decrease in bilirubin in group I and a transient increase of serum albumin in group II. Four patients developed complications in each group, mainly hyponatremia, while one patient in each group developed renal impairment. One patient from group I died with hepatic encephalopathy. Moreover, the probability of survival and readmission to the hospital because of tense ascites were similar in both groups of patients during the follow-up. The treatment cost with Dextran 70 was 15.50 dollars vs. 364.30 dollars with albumin for each patient treated. These results indicate that repeated large volume paracentesis associated with Dextran 70 is as effective and safe as paracentesis associated with albumin in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. However, due to its reduced cost, paracentesis with Dextran 70 may be considered the treatment of choice in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites without liver cancer and renal failure.     

Comparison of paracentesis and diuretics in the treatment of cirrhotics with tense ascites. Results of a randomized study

To investigate whether paracentesis could be an alternative therapy for ascites, 117 cirrhotics with tense ascites were randomly allocated into two groups. Fifty-eight patients (group 1) were treated with paracentesis (4-6 L/day until disappearance of ascites) and intravenous albumin infusion (40 g after each tap). Fifty-nine patients (group 2) were treated with spironolactone (200-400 mg/day) plus furosemide (40-240 mg/day). Patients from group 2 not responding to diuretics were treated with a LeVeen shunt. After disappearance of ascites, patients from both groups were discharged from hospital and were instructed to take diuretics. Patients developing tense ascites during follow-up were readmitted to hospital and treated according to their initial schedule. Paracentesis was effective in eliminating the ascites in 56 patients from group 1 (96.5%) and did not induce significant changes in renal and hepatic function, plasma volume, cardiac index, peripheral resistance, plasma renin activity, plasma norepinephrine and antidiuretic hormone concentration, and urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha. Diuretics were effective in eliminating the ascites in 43 patients from group 2 (72.8%) (p less than 0.05). Ten patients in group 1 and 36 in group 2 developed complications during their first hospital stay (p less than 0.001). This difference was due to the significantly higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, renal impairment, and electrolyte disturbances occurring in patients treated with diuretics. The duration of hospital stay was 11.7 +/- 1.5 days for patients from group 1 and 31 +/- 2.8 days for patients from group 2 (p less than 0.001). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the probability of requiring readmission to hospital during follow-up, reasons for readmission, survival probability after entry into the study, and causes of death. These results indicate that paracentesis associated with intravenous albumin infusion is a fast, effective, and safe therapy for ascites in patients with cirrhosis.     

Comparison of the effect of terlipressin and albumin on arterial blood volume in patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites treated by paracentesis: a randomised pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites treated by paracentesis alone have a decrease in effective arterial blood volume after ascites removal. Although intravenous albumin is effective in preventing paracentesis induced decreased arterial blood volume, its clinical use is controversial. As paracentesis induces arteriolar vasodilation which plays a role in the development of decreased effective arterial blood volume, administration of a vasoconstrictor (terlipressin) could prevent circulatory alterations due to paracentesis. AIMS: To perform a pilot study comparing the effects of terlipressin and albumin on effective arterial blood volume in patients with cirrhosis treated by paracentesis for tense ascites. METHODS: Twenty patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites were randomly assigned to be treated by either paracentesis and terlipressin or paracentesis and albumin. Terlipressin (3 mg) or albumin (8 g/l of removed ascites) were administered on the day of paracentesis. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed by measuring plasma renin concentrations at baseline and on the day of hospital discharge (4-6 days after treatment). Decreased effective arterial blood volume was defined as an increase in plasma renin concentrations on the day of hospital discharge of more than 50% of baseline values. RESULTS: Irrespective of the treatment group, mean values for plasma renin concentrations at hospital discharge did not differ from their respective baseline values (p=0.10). Baseline plasma levels of renin concentrations did not differ between the terlipressin and albumin groups (p=0.61). Changes from baseline in plasma renin concentrations did not differ between groups (p=0.39). Three patients in the terlipressin group and three in the albumin group developed decreased arterial blood volume. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised pilot study suggests that terlipressin may be as effective as intravenous albumin in preventing a decrease in effective arterial blood volume in patients with cirrhosis treated by paracentesis for tense ascites.     

Reinfusion of Concentrated Ascitic Fluid versus Total Paracentesis (A Randomized Prospective Trial)

We compared the efficacy and safety of apheresisand reinfusion of concentrated ascites (ARCA) versustotal paracentesis plus intravenous albumin (PARA) in aprospective trial on cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Twenty-four patients wererandomized to either ARCA (N = 12) or PARA (N = 12), andfollowed for two years. Sex, age, Child's class, andrenal and liver function were similar in the two groups. The times of the procedures were 2.7 ±1.0 (ARCA) vs 2.2 ± 1.1 (PARA) hr, with removalof 8.8 ± 3.5 (ARCA) and 6.9 ± 3.4 (PARA)liters of ascites and intravenous infusion of 59.8± 35.2 (ARCA) and 42.5 ± 20.5 (PARA) g of albumin. Both procedures were safe.Biochemical signs of coagulative disturbances having noclinical relevance were observed after ARCA, with anincrease in prothrombin time (P = 0.005) and serum FSP (P = 0.02). No significant changes in renalfunction, serum albumin, or plasma and urinaryelectrolytes were shown. Plasma renin activity increasedafter PARA (P = 0.02) and plasma atrial natriureticfactor increased after ARCA (P = 0.008), although nodifferences were observed in diuresis in the immediatefollow-up. During the long-term follow-up, patientsurvival and recurrence of tense ascites were the same in both groups. We conclude that apheresis andreinfusion of concentrated ascites are as safe andeffective as total paracentesis with albumin infusionfor the treatment of tense ascites in cirrhoticpatients.     

Randomized trial comparing albumin and saline in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotic patients with ascites

Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD) is a recently described complication that can be prevented with the administration of plasma expanders. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of saline versus albumin in the prevention of PICD. Patients were randomized to receive albumin or saline after total paracentesis. Patients readmitted as a consequence of a second episode of tense ascites were treated with total paracentesis and the alternative plasma expander. After randomization, 35 patients received saline and 37 received albumin. Twenty-one patients were readmitted for tense ascites and treated with the alternative expander. Significant increases in plasma renin activity (PRA) were found 24 hours and 6 days after paracentesis when saline was used (baseline, 5.6 +/- 5.7; 24 hours, 7.6 +/- 6.9; 6 days, 8.5 +/- 8.0 ng x mL(-1). hr(-1); P <.05 and P <.01 vs. baseline, respectively), whereas no significant changes were observed with albumin. The incidence of PICD was significantly higher in the saline group versus the albumin group (33.3% vs. 11.4%, respectively; P =.03). However, no significant differences were found when less than 6 L of ascitic fluid was evacuated (6.7% vs. 5.6% in the saline and albumin groups, respectively; P =.9). Similar results were observed when analyzing patients who received 2 consecutive paracentesis (i.e., a significant increase in PRA after saline [P <.01] without significant variations after albumin). In conclusion, albumin is more effective than saline in the prevention of PICD. Saline is a valid alternative to albumin when less than 6 L of ascitic fluid is evacuated.     

The efficacy of terlipressin in comparison with albumin in the prevention of circulatory changes after the paracentesis of tense ascites--a randomized multicentric study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction is the most severe complication of ascites paracentesis. The aim of our study was to compare the standard treatment with the administration of a vasoconstrictor terlipressin. METHODOLOGY: Forty-nine patients treated by paracentesis due to tense ascites were randomized for the treatment with albumin (8g/L of removed ascites) or terlipressin (1 mg every four hours for 48 hours). The blood pressure, heart rate, diuresis, electrocardiograph, standard biochemical and hematological parameters, sodium, potassium and nitrogen urinary excretion, aldosterone and renin activity in the blood plasma were monitored for a period of 72 hours. RESULTS: In any parameter of hemodynamic changes, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated between randomized groups, in particular measurements as well as in the development in the course of the first three days after the intervention. The result suggests similar efficacy of the circulatory dysfunction prevention after the paracentesis in both treatment procedures. In both groups, on the first three days, there was a tendency to improve hemodynamics reflected by the renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system activity. In the terlipressin group, this tendency approached statistically significant levels. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of terlipressin in a dose of 1 mg every fourth hour performed for a period of 48 hours was as effective as intravenous albumin in preventing hemodynamic changes in patients with tense ascites treated by paracentesis. The treatment was well tolerated.     

Prevention of paracentesis‐induced circulatory dysfunction: midodrine vs albumin. A randomized pilot study

Background/Aims: Large‐volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites induces arterial vasodilatation and decreases effective arterial blood volume, termed paracentesis‐induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD), which can be prevented by costly intravenous albumin. Vasoconstrictors, e.g. terlipressin, may also prevent PICD. The aim was to compare the less expensive vasoconstrictor midodrine, an α‐adrenoceptor agonist, with albumin in preventing PICD. Methods: Twenty‐four patients with cirrhosis and ascites were randomly assigned to be treated with either midodrine (n=11) (12.5 mg three times per day; over 2 days) or albumin (n=13) (8 g/L of removed ascites) after large‐volume paracentesis. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed indirectly by measuring plasma renin and aldosterone concentration on days 0 and 6 after paracentesis; renal function and haemodynamic changes were also measured. PICD was defined as an increase in plasma renin concentration on day 6 by more than 50% of the baseline value. Results: PICD developed in six patients of the midodrine group (60%) and in only four patients (31%) of the albumin group. Six days after paracentesis, the aldosterone concentration increased significantly in the midodrine group, but not in the albumin group. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that midodrine is not as effective as albumin in preventing circulatory dysfunction after large‐volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.     

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients treated using paracentesis or diuretics: Results of a randomized study

Diuretic treatment in cirrhotic patients with ascites increases ascitic fluid concentration of total protein and complement components, and opsonic activity. These changes are not observed in patients treated with paracentesis. Based on these data it has been suggested that therapeutic paracentesis may be associated with an increased risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) development. To assess this possibility, 80 cirrhotic patients with tense ascites were randomly allocated in two therapeutic groups: group 1 (40 patients) was treated with total paracentesis associated with plasma volume expansion and group 2 was treated with diuretics. After mobilization of ascites, patients from both groups received diuretics to avoid reaccumulation of ascites; cases that developed tense ascites during follow-up (mean follow-up period, 60 ± 6 and 55 ± 4 weeks, respectively) were treated according to initial randomization. Patients from both groups had similar results regarding baseline clinical and standard laboratory data, ascitic fluid concentration of total protein, complement components, and opsonic activity. Sixteen patients (7 from group 1 and 9 from group 2) developed SBP during the study period. The 4-week and 1-year probability of SBP occurrence were 2.5% and 18.6%, respectively, in group 1 patients, and 11.9% and 24%, respectively, in group 2 patients. Therefore, our study indicates that therapeutic paracentesis does not increase the early- and long-term risk of SBP development in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites.     

Atrial natriuretic factor and renin-aldosterone in volume regulation of patients with cirrhosis

The role of the atrial natriuretic factor and of the main counteracting sodium-retaining principle, the renin-aldosterone system, in acute volume regulation of cirrhosis of the liver has been investigated. Central volume stimulation was achieved in 21 patients with cirrhosis, 11 without and 10 with ascites, and 25 healthy controls by 1-hr head-out water immersion. Immersion prompted a highly significant (p less than 0.001) increase of atrial natriuretic factor plasma concentrations in cirrhotic patients without ascites from 8.5 +/- 1.3 fmoles per ml to 16.5 +/- 2.6 fmoles per ml, comparable to the stimulation in control subjects (6.0 +/- 0.6 fmoles per ml to 13.6 +/- 2.6 fmoles per ml). In cirrhotic patients with ascites, atrial natriuretic factor increase (from 7.7 +/- 1.3 fmoles per ml to 11.4 +/- 2.3 fmoles per ml) was blunted (p less than 0.05). Plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration were elevated in cirrhotic patients, especially in the presence of ascites. Following immersion, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration were reduced similarly in all groups. Water immersion induced a more pronounced natriuresis and diuresis in control subjects than in cirrhotic patients. Neither atrial natriuretic factor nor plasma renin activity nor plasma aldosterone concentration alone correlated to sodium excretion. However, atrial natriuretic factor to plasma aldosterone concentration ratios were closely correlated to basal and stimulated natriuresis in cirrhotic patients, particularly in those with ascites. These data suggest that atrial natriuretic factor and the renin-aldosterone system influence volume regulation in patients with cirrhosis.     

Clinical, biochemical, and hormonal changes after a single, large-volume paracentesis in cirrhosis with ascites

The use of paracentesis has recently been reproposed as a safe and effective alternative to diuretics for management of ascites. We have investigated the clinical and biochemical effects of large-volume paracentesis in 19 cirrhotics with tense ascites, and the relative changes in the hormones involved in sodium and water renal handling. Plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone (PA), and arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels and conventional liver and renal function tests were measured before and after 1, 2, and 7 days after the paracentesis. No complications were observed, but patients regained 37% of the weight lost after 1 wk. Percent weight regained was significantly and directly correlated with PA concentration measured before the paracentesis. No changes were recorded after paracentesis in biochemical and clinical data, except for a significant drop in diastolic blood pressure. No changes in AVP levels were observed. A significant increase in PA occurred after paracentesis, with a maximum peak after 48 h. The increase in PA was not accompanied by changes in PRA, but was associated with a reduction of urinary sodium excretion. A relevant fraction of body aldosterone was confined to the ascitic fluid. We conclude that the clinical results of a large-volume paracentesis can be predicted in part on the basis of PA measurement, and that removal of ascites is followed by an increase of PA of uncertain origin and effectiveness.     

Noradrenaline and albumin in paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: a randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a circulatory dysfunction. Intravenous albumin has been used to prevent the circulatory dysfunction; however, the use of albumin is controversial and costly. Splanchnic vasodilation is mainly responsible for circulatory dysfunction in these patients. There are no reports of use of noradrenaline, a vasoconstrictor, on the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, we studied the preventive effect of noradrenaline on paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis and compared it with that of intravenous albumin in a randomized pilot study. METHODS: Forty patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites underwent therapeutic paracentesis with albumin or noradrenaline in a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary centre. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed by measuring plasma renin activity at baseline and at 6 days after treatment. RESULTS: Effective arterial blood volume as indicated by plasma renin activity before and 6 days after paracentesis did not differ in the two groups (20.62 +/- 10.27-22.02 +/- 10.15 ng mL(-1) h(-1); P = 0.11 in the albumin group and 19.66 +/- 8.91-20.78 +/- 9.41 ng mL(-1) h(-1); P = 0.37 in the noradrenaline group). Plasma aldosterone concentration before and 6 days after paracentesis were also similar in both groups (1196.5 +/- 434.2-1217.0 +/- 405.7 pg mL(-1); P = 0.7 in the albumin group and 1206.0 +/- 522.5-1273.5 +/- 444.8 pg mL(-1); P = 0.22 in the noradrenaline group). The cost of noradrenaline treatment was significantly lower when compared with that of albumin (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Noradrenaline is as effective as albumin in preventing paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis, but at a fraction of the cost.     

USE OF AN INTRAVENOUS SODIUM LOAD IN SCREENING FOR PRIMARY HYPERALDOSTERONISM

A sodium loading test was performed in 35 patients presenting with hypertension and hypokalemia. In 14 of these patients, intravenous administration of 0.9% saline (2 I in 4 h) on two consecutive days caused urinary aldosterone excretion to fall to values within the range for normal volunteers. The other 21 patients, in whom urinary aldosterone excretion did not decline following two days of saline loading, or in whom pronounced hypokalemia after the first day of loading precluded further saline infusion, were designated as having primary aldosteronism. Seventeen of this group underwent surgery and discrete adrenal adenomas were found in 16. When serum potassium concentration, plasma renin activity or the relationships of serum potassium to concurrent urinary potassium excretion or of urinary aldosterone excretion to plasma renin activity were used as alternative diagnostic criteria for primary aldosteronism, overlapping of the two groups occurred. It is concluded that measurement of urinary aldosterone excretion after intravenous sodium loading is a useful test in the identification of primary aldosteronism due to aldosterone-producing adenoma. In this series the saline loading test was more specific in diagnosis than criteria based on serum and urinary potassium, plasma renin activity or unsuppressed aldosterone excretion.     

Abdominal decompression plays a major role in early postparacentesis haemodynamic changes in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites

BACKGROUND: Some cirrhotic patients with tense ascites who undergo paracentesis develop a circulatory dysfunction syndrome, manifested by an increase in plasma renin activity. Recently, a significant inverse correlation between postparacentesis changes in plasma renin activity and systemic vascular resistance has been demonstrated in these patients, suggesting that peripheral arterial vasodilatation could be responsible for this circulatory dysfunction, but the mechanisms by which tense ascites removal induces such changes are unknown AIM: To investigate the role of a decrease in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in the development of early postparacentesis haemodynamic changes METHODS: Eleven cirrhotic patients with tense ascites received a large volume paracentesis. A specially designed pneumatic girdle was used to compress the abdomen to avoid a decrease in IAP during ascites removal. Haemodynamic studies were performed before paracentesis, one hour after ascites flow stopped, and 30 minutes after pneumatic girdle deflation RESULTS: When IAP was maintained at its original level, no haemodynamic changes were observed, despite large volume paracentesis. However, a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance was seen immediately after pneumatic girdle deflation CONCLUSIONS: Early haemodynamic changes after paracentesis are avoided if IAP is maintained at its original level. The abrupt decrease in IAP could be the trigger for the development of the initial haemodynamic changes that eventually produce postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction.     

Terlipressin versus albumin in paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: A randomized study

Background: Therapeutic paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis induces arterial vasodilatation, causes a decrease in effective arterial blood volume and leads to circulatory dysfunction, which can be prevented by intravenous albumin. However, the use of albumin, being a blood product, is controversial. Recently, terlipressin, a vasoconstrictor, has been successfully used to combat this adverse effect of therapeutic paracentesis. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the preventive effect of terlipressin on paracentesis‐induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis and compared with that of intravenous albumin. Methods: Forty patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites underwent therapeutic paracentesis with albumin or terlipressin in a randomized pilot study at a tertiary center. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed by measuring plasma renin activity at baseline and at 4–6 days after treatment. Results: Effective arterial blood volumes as indicated by plasma renin activity before and 4–6 days after paracentesis did not differ in the two groups (19.15 ± 12.1 to 20.33 ± 12.8 ng/mL per h, P = 0.46 in the albumin group; and 20.11 ± 10.6 to 21.08 ± 10.52 ng/mL per h, P = 0.44 in the terlipressin group). Plasma aldosterone concentrations before and 4–6 days after paracentesis were also similar in both groups (1334.75 ± 1058 to 1440.0 ± 1161 pg/mL, P = 0.06 in the albumin group; and 1473.0 ± 1168 to 1572.29 ± 1182 pg/mL, P = 0.24 in the terlipressin group). Both terlipressin and albumin prevented paracentesis‐induced renal impairment in these patients. Conclusions: Terlipressin may be as effective as intravenous albumin in preventing paracentesis‐induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis.