Phase II study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol administered to patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Flavopiridol is the first cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor to enter clinical trials. Activity in gastric cancer xenografts and in a patient with gastric cancer on the phase I trial led to this phase II study of flavopiridol in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were entered onto the study, and 14 were assessable for response. Flavopiridol was administered initially at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)/d by continuous infusion for 72 hours every 2 weeks. Assessment of plasma pharmacokinetics was performed in all patients. Peripheral mononuclear cells were collected throughout the 72-hour infusion for determinants of apoptosis. RESULTS: There were no major objective responses (exact confidence interval 0% to 23%). One patient achieved a minor response in his liver metastases, though the primary progressed. Other patients exhibited histologic and radiographic evidence of tumor necrosis. Common toxicities included fatigue in 93% of patients (grade 3 or 4 in 27%) and diarrhea in 73% of patients (grade 3 or 4 in 20%). Five patients (33%) developed venous thromboses at the central catheter tip. The studies performed on peripheral mononuclear cells indicated no induction of apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Flavopiridol administered as a single agent for 72 hours every 14 days is inactive in the treatment of gastric cancer. The drug also induced an unexpected higher incidence of vascular thrombosis and fatigue than was anticipated from the phase I trials. Future development of flavopiridol will depend on other doses and schedules in combination with chemotherapy.     

Phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicities and characterize the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and flavopiridol in patients with metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel was administered at an initial dose of 60 mg/m(2) followed in 24 hours by a 72-hour infusion of flavopiridol at 50 mg/m(2)/d every 3 weeks. Because dose-limiting myelosuppression occurred, the schedule was amended to docetaxel, 50 mg/m(2), followed by escalating doses of flavopiridol (starting dose, 26 mg/m(2)/d) as a 1-hour infusion daily for 3 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed. Ki67, p53, and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (phospho-Rb) in paired tumor and buccal mucosa biopsies (obtained pre- and posttreatment) were examined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled. Five patients received docetaxel and 72-hour flavopiridol. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia. Six patients received docetaxel and 1-hour flavopiridol, and the dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 hypotension. Pharmacokinetics of flavopiridol and docetaxel were consistent with historical data. Nuclear staining with p53 increased and phospho-Rb decreased in 10 pairs of buccal mucosa biopsies posttreatment (P = 0.002 and P = 0.04, respectively). No significant changes in Ki67, p53, or phospho-Rb were detected in six paired tumors. Two patients sustained stable disease for >3 months (72-hour flavopiridol), and one partial response was observed (1-hour flavopiridol). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel combined with 72-hour flavopiridol was not feasible because of dose-limiting neutropenia. Dose escalation of a 1-hour infusion of flavopiridol with docetaxel was also not possible. The changes in p53 and phospho-Rb in buccal mucosa suggest that a biological effect with flavopiridol was achieved.     

Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose.

To evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit, in combination with paclitaxel.

Patients and Methods.

Pazopanib was given daily with weekly paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose levels of pazopanib (mg/day)/paclitaxel (mg/m²) were 400/15, 800/15, 800/50, and 800/80. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTR. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate the effect of pazopanib, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 substrate.

Results.

Of 26 enrolled patients, 17 were treated at the MTR of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included a grade 3 abscess and grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. Other toxicities included elevated liver transaminases and diarrhea. Six patients (23%) had partial responses and 15 patients (58%) had stable disease. Administration of 800 mg pazopanib resulted in a 14% lower paclitaxel clearance and a 31% higher paclitaxel maximal concentration than with administration of paclitaxel alone at 15, 50, and 80 mg/m². At the MTR, coadministration of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel resulted in a 26% higher geometric mean paclitaxel area under the curve.

Conclusion.

Pazopanib, at a dose of 800 mg daily, can be safely combined with a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² when administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. The observed greater plasma concentrations of paclitaxel given concurrently with pazopanib suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.     

Phase I dose-finding study of weekly docetaxel followed by flavopiridol for patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Flavopiridol is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that enhances docetaxel-induced apoptosis in a sequence-specific manner. In vivo, docetaxel must precede flavopiridol by at least 4 h to induce this effect. We conducted a phase I trial of weekly, sequential docetaxel followed 4 h later by flavopiridol in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel at a fixed dose of 35 mg/m2 was administered over 30 min, followed 4 h later by escalating doses of flavopiridol, ranging from 20 to 80 mg/m2 in successive cohorts, administered weekly over 1 h. This schedule was repeated for 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-seven evaluable patients were enrolled. The combination was well tolerated, with one dose-limiting toxicity occurring at flavopiridol 70 mg/m2 (grade 3 mucositis) and one dose-limiting toxicity at 80 mg/m2 (grade 4 neutropenia). We observed 1 complete response in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma and 4 partial responses in pancreatic (1), breast (2), and ovarian (1) cancer patients. Stable disease was seen in 10 patients. Pharmacokinetic studies showed Cmax ranging from 1.49 +/- 0.69 micromol/L (flavopiridol 20 mg/m2) to 4.54 +/- 0.08 micromol/L (flavopiridol 60 mg/m2) in cycle 1. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with weekly, sequential docetaxel followed by flavopiridol is an effective and safe regimen at all flavopiridol dose levels. The pharmacokinetic data indicate that concentrations of flavopiridol that enhance the effects of docetaxel both in vitro and in vivo can be achieved. Clinical activity is encouraging, even in patients who have received a prior taxane and in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol

PURPOSE: Flavopiridol (NSC 649890) is a synthetic flavone possessing significant antitumor activity in preclinical models. Flavopiridol is capable of inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, presumably through its potent, specific inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. We conducted a phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of flavopiridol given as a 72-h continuous intravenous infusion repeated every 2 weeks. METHODS: A total of 38 patients were treated at dose levels of 8, 16, 26.6, 40, 50 and 56 mg/m(2)/24 h. During the first infusion, plasma was sampled at 24, 48 and 72 h to determine steady-state concentrations, and peripheral blood lymphocytes were assessed by flow cytometry for evidence of apoptosis. Additional postinfusion pharmacokinetic sampling was done at the 40 and 50 mg/m(2)/24 h dose levels. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal toxicity was dose limiting, with diarrhea being the predominant symptom. Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension was also frequently noted. Several patients experienced tumor-specific pain during their infusions. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 40 mg/m(2)/24 h. A patient with metastatic gastric cancer at this dose level had a complete response and remained disease-free for more than 48 months after completing therapy. Plasma concentrations at 24 h into the infusion were 94% of those achieved at steady state. Steady-state plasma flavopiridol concentrations at the MTD were 416.6+/-98.9 micro M. These concentrations are at or above those needed to see cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in vitro. The mean clearance of flavopiridol over the dose range was 11.3+/-3.9 l/h per m(2), similar to values obtained preclinically. Elimination was biphasic. The terminal half-life at the MTD was 26.0 h. No significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were noted between males and females. Patients taking cholestyramine to ameliorate flavopiridol-induced diarrhea had lower steady-state plasma concentrations. There was no significant change in the cell cycle parameters of peripheral blood lymphocytes analyzed by flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and recommended phase II dose of flavopiridol given by this schedule is 40 mg/m(2)/24 h. The manageable gastrointestinal toxicity, early signs of clinical activity and lack of hematologic toxicity make further exploration in combination trials warranted.     

Phase I study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib with paclitaxel in solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum tolerated dose of lonafarnib, a novel farnesyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors and to characterize the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of this combination regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a Phase I trial, lonafarnib was administered p.o., twice daily (b.i.d.) on continuously scheduled doses of 100 mg, 125 mg, and 150 mg in combination with i.v. paclitaxel at doses of 135 mg/m(2) or 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 h on day 8 of every 21-day cycle. Plasma paclitaxel and lonafarnib concentrations were collected at selected time points from each patient. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 21 patients were evaluable. The principal grade 3/4 toxicity was diarrhea (5 of 21 patients), which was most likely due to lonafarnib. dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia at dose level 3 (100 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel); grade 4 diarrhea and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy at dose level 3A (125 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel); and grade 4 neutropenia with fever and grade 4 diarrhea at level 4 (150 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel). The maximum tolerated dose established by the continual reassessment method was lonafarnib 100 mg b.i.d. and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel appeared to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lonafarnib. The median duration of therapy was eight cycles, including seven cycles with paclitaxel. Six of 15 previously treated patients had a durable partial response, including 3 patients who had previous taxane therapy. Notably, two of five patients with taxane-resistant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer had partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with paclitaxel, the recommended dose of lonafarnib for Phase II trials is 100 mg p.o. twice daily with 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel i.v. every 3 weeks. Additional studies of lonafarnib in combination regimens appear warranted, particularly in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU101 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility and pharmacologic behavior of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU101, administered on a prolonged, intermittent dosing schedule to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated with SU101 doses ranging from 15 to 443 mg/m(2) as a 24-hour continuous intravenous (IV) infusion weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to characterize the disposition of SU101 and its major active metabolite, SU0020. Immunohistochemical staining of PDGF-alpha and -beta receptors was performed on malignant tumor specimens obtained at diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with 52 courses (187 infusions) of SU101. The most common toxicities were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, and fever. Two patients experienced one episode each of grade 3 neutropenia at the 333 and 443 mg/m(2) dose levels. Dose escalation of SU101 above 443 mg/m(2)/wk was precluded by the total volume of infusate required, 2.5 to 3.0 L. Individual plasma SU101 and SU0020 concentrations were described by a one-compartment model that incorporates both first-order formation and elimination of SU0020. SU101 was rapidly converted to SU0020, which exhibited a long elimination half-life averaging 19 +/- 12 days. At the 443 mg/m(2)/wk dose level, trough plasma SU0020 concentrations during weeks 2 and 4 ranged from 54 to 522 micromol/L. Immunohistochemical studies revealed PDGF-alpha and -beta receptor staining in the majority (15 of 19) of malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSION: SU101 was well tolerated as a 24-hour continuous IV infusion at doses of up to 443 mg/m(2)/wk for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. Although further dose escalation was precluded by infusate volume constraints, this SU101 dose schedule resulted in the achievement and maintenance of substantial plasma concentrations of the major metabolite, SU0020, for the entire treatment period.     

Phase I study of oral CI-994 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine maximum tolerated dose of CI-994, a novel oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors who had received two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible for trial. Five cohorts of patients were treated with escalating doses (4-6 mg/m2) and alternative schedules (7 days or 14 days) of CI-994. Dose escalation of paclitaxel was performed to achieve tolerability of CI-994 with a paclitaxel dose of 225 mg/m2 when administered in combination with carboplatin. Pharmacokinetic assessment of CI-994 was performed by using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Histone deacetylation inhibition was determined by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (median age 58 years) were entered into five treatment cohorts. Maximum tolerated dose of CI-994 was determined to be 4 mg/m2 administered for 7 consecutive days following paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 every 21 days. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 respiratory insufficiency limited further dose escalation of CI-994. Pharmacokinetics showed that CI-994 absorption and disposition were unaffected by carboplatin and paclitaxel coadministration. Association between histone H3 acetylation levels and disease response was suggested. A subset of patients with lymphocyte H3 acetylation levels at least 1.5-fold times baseline all achieved either a clinical response or stable disease. All evaluable patients with progressive disease (PD) had H3 acetylation levels <1.5-fold times baseline. Twenty-four of the 30 patients received greater than one cycle of treatment. Five of these patients achieved a partial response (3 nonsmall cell lung cancer, 1 colorectal cancer, and 1 unknown primary) and 2 patients achieved a complete response (esophageal and bladder cancer). CONCLUSION: The combination of CI-994 at a dose of 4 mg/m2 administered orally for 7 consecutive days can be safely coadministered with paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Evidence of antitumor activity is suggested and may correlate with histone modulation.     

Phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biological study of erlotinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering erlotinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin, and to identify pharmacokinetic interactions, evaluate downstream effects of EGFR inhibition on surrogate tissues, and seek preliminary evidence for clinical activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated continuously with erlotinib at doses of 100, 125, and 150 mg/d orally along with fixed i.v. doses of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg x min/mL, both on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty evaluable patients were treated with 136 courses of erlotinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. Myelosuppression, skin rash, and diarrhea were the principal toxicities. Dose limiting diarrhea occurred in 1 of 6 patients at the 100 mg erlotinib dose level, whereas 0 of 9 evaluable patients at the 125 mg erlotinib dose level experienced dose limiting toxicity and 3 of 5 evaluable patients at 150 mg erlotinib experienced dose limiting skin rash and neutropenic sepsis. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions between paclitaxel and erlotinib; however, total carboplatin exposure trended higher in the presence of erlotinib. No consistent downstream effects on EGFR inhibition were found in skin. Durable objective responses were observed in non-small-cell lung and head and neck cancers. CONCLUSIONS: A dose level of erlotinib 125 mg combined with paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg.min/mL is recommended for disease-directed studies. This phase I trial was followed by a randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer using a similar regimen.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor,in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

AZD7762 is a Chk1 kinase inhibitor which increases sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, including gemcitabine. We evaluated the safety of AZD7762 monotherapy and with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumor patients.

Experimental design

In this Phase I study, patients received intravenous AZD7762 on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day run-in cycle (cycle 0; AZD7762 monotherapy), followed by AZD7762 plus gemcitabine 750–1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, in ascending AZD7762 doses (cycle 1; combination therapy).

Results

Forty-two patients received AZD7762 6 mg (n = 9), 9 mg (n = 3), 14 mg (n = 6), 21 mg (n = 3), 30 mg (n = 7), 32 mg (n = 6), and 40 mg (n = 8), in combination with gemcitabine. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue [41 % (17/42) patients], neutropenia/leukopenia [36 % (15/42) patients], anemia/Hb decrease [29 % (12/42) patients] and nausea, pyrexia and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase [26 % (11/42) patients each]. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 19 and 52 % of patients in cycles 0 and 1, respectively. Cardiac dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two patients (both AZD7762 monotherapy): grade 3 troponin I increase (32 mg) and grade 3 myocardial ischemia with chest pain, electrocardiogram changes, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and increased troponin I (40 mg). AZD7762 exposure increased linearly. Gemcitabine did not affect AZD7762 pharmacokinetics. Two non-small-cell lung cancer patients achieved partial tumor responses (AZD7762 6 mg/gemcitabine 750 mg/m² and AZD7762 9 mg cohort).

Conclusions

The maximum-tolerated dose of AZD7762 in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² was 30 mg. Although development of AZD7762 is not going forward owing to unpredictable cardiac toxicity, Chk1 remains an important therapeutic target.     

Phase I study of the sequential administration of edatrexate and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: The antifolate edatrexate and the microtubule-stabilizing agent paclitaxel have both demonstrated single-agent activity in lung and breast cancer. In vitro, the sequential combination of edatrexate followed by paclitaxel produced synergistic antitumor effects. This trial was designed to find the maximum tolerated doses of edatrexate and paclitaxel when given every two weeks utilizing this sequential schedule.Patients and methods: Thirty-four patients with solid tumors received edatrexate intravenously on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel intravenously as a three-hour infusion on days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Edatrexate was escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2 and the paclitaxel dose fixed at 135 mg/m2. When the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, edatrexate was fixed at 120 mg/m2 and paclitaxel escalated to 175 and 210 mg/m2.Results: All 34 patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate and 210 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Grade 3 myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and an infusion-related reaction occurred. Eight patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with bladder cancer achieved major objective responses.Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses are 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate days 1 and 15 and 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel as a three-hour infusion days 2 and 16 of a 28 day cycle. These results warrant phase II trials of the combination leading to phase III studies comparing the two drugs to a single agent to confirm the preclinical evidence of synergy.     

Phase I study of the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor GDC-0575 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors

BackgroundCheckpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibition following chemotherapy-elicited DNA damage overrides cell cycle arrest and induces mitotic catastrophe and cell death. GDC-0575 is a highly-selective oral small-molecule Chk1 inhibitor that results in tumor shrinkage and growth delay in xenograft models. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of GDC-0575 alone and in combination with gemcitabine. Antitumor activity and Chk1 pathway modulation were assessed.Patients and methodsIn this phase I open-label study, in the dose escalation stage, patients were enrolled in a GDC-0575 monotherapy Arm (1) or GDC-0575 combination with gemcitabine Arm (2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Patients in arm 2 received either i.v. gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (arm 2a) or 500 mg/m² (arm 2b), followed by GDC-0575 (45 or 80 mg, respectively, as RP2D). Stage II enrolled disease-specific cohorts.ResultsOf 102 patients treated, 70% were female, the median age was 59 years (range 27–85), and 47% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0. The most common tumor type was breast (37%). The most frequent adverse events (all grades) related to GDC-0575 and/or gemcitabine were neutropenia (68%), anemia (48%), nausea (43%), fatigue (42%), and thrombocytopenia (35%). Maximum concentrations of GDC-0575 were achieved within 2 hours of dosing, and half-life was ∼23 hours. No pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction was observed between GDC-0575 and gemcitabine. Among patients treated with GDC-0575 and gemcitabine, there were four confirmed partial responses, three occurring in patients with tumors harboring TP53 mutation. Pharmacodynamic data were consistent with GDC-0575 inhibition of gemcitabine-induced expression of pCDK1/2.ConclusionGDC-0575 can be safely administered as a monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine; however, overall tolerability with gemcitabine was modest. Hematological toxicities were frequent but manageable. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed but limited to a small number of patients with a variety of refractory solid tumors treated with GDC-0575 and gemcitabine.Clinical trial numberNCT01564251.     

A Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

Pazopanib plus gemcitabine combination therapy was explored in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

In a modified 3 + 3 enrollment scheme, oral once-daily pazopanib was administered with intravenous gemcitabine (Days 1 and 8, 21-day cycles). Three protocol-specified dose levels were tested: pazopanib 400 mg plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m², pazopanib 800 mg plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m², and pazopanib 800 mg plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m². Maximum-tolerated dose was based on dose-limiting toxicities during treatment Cycle 1. In the expansion phase, six additional patients were enrolled at the highest tolerable dose level.

Results

Twenty-two patients were enrolled. At the highest dose level tested (pazopanib 800 plus gemcitabine 1,250), patients received >80 % of their planned dose and the regimen was deemed safe and tolerable. The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, neutropenia, nausea, and decreased appetite. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common events leading to dose modifications. Pharmacokinetic interaction between pazopanib and gemcitabine was not observed. One objective partial response at the highest dose was observed in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Prolonged disease stabilization (>12 cycles) was reported in three patients (metastatic melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma).

Conclusion

Combination pazopanib plus gemcitabine therapy is tolerable, with an adverse event profile reflective of that associated with the individual agents. There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction with pazopanib plus gemcitabine co-administration, although patient numbers were limited. Further investigation of combined pazopanib plus gemcitabine is warranted.     

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of continuous weekly-administered paclitaxel and BMS-214662, a novel farnesyl transferase inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated every week as tolerated with i.v. paclitaxel (fixed dose, 80 mg/m(2)/wk) administered over 1 h followed by i.v. BMS-214662 (escalating doses, 80-245 mg/m(2)/wk) over 1 h starting 30 min after completion of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 94 courses (one course, 21 days) of study treatment. Two patients received five courses of BMS-214662 as a weekly 24-h infusion (209 mg/m(2)/wk). The most common toxicities were grade 1 to 2 nausea/vomiting and/or diarrhea. DLTs observed at or near the MTD (200 mg/m(2)/wk) were grade 4 febrile neutropenia with sepsis occurring on day 2 of course 1 (245 mg/m(2)/wk), reversible grade 3 to 4 serum transaminase increases on day 2, and grade 3 diarrhea (200 and 245 mg/m(2)/wk). Objective partial responses were observed in patients with pretreated head and neck, ovarian, and hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas, and leiomyosarcoma. The observed pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and BMS-214662 imply no interaction between the two. Significant inhibition (>80%) of farnesyl transferase activity in peripheral mononuclear cells was observed at the end of BMS-214662 infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreated patients with advanced malignancies can tolerate weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 at doses that achieve objective clinical benefit. Due to multiple DLTs occurring at the expanded MTD, the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule is paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and BMS-214662 (160 mg/m(2) over 1 h) administered weekly.     

Sunitinib in combination with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: phase I study results

Purpose  

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and antitumor activity of sunitinib combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel in adult Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

Polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel (PM paclitaxel) is a nanoscale drug delivery compound. This study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PM paclitaxel in Chinese patients with treatment-refractory advanced or relapsed solid tumors.

Methods

Dose escalation of PM paclitaxel followed the standard ‘3 + 3’ rule, starting at 175 mg/m². PM paclitaxel was administered over 3 h every 3 weeks. Patients were treated until disease progression, intolerance, death, or consent withdrawal. Blood samples were collected for PK testing.

Results

All 23 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia were the most common toxicities; acute hypersensitivity reaction was not observed. One of six patients at dose level 4 (350 mg/m²) and two of six patients at dose level 5 (390 mg/m²) developed grade 4 neutropenia. The MTD was 350 mg/m². No patients discontinued treatment because of neuropathy. Partial response was seen in five of 20 patients (25 %) who had response assessment, three of whom had prior exposure to taxanes (two were heavily pretreated). Ten patients (50 %) had stable disease at cycle 2 and only five patients (25 %) had disease progression. The area under the curve and the maximum concentration of paclitaxel increased with escalating doses, suggesting that PM paclitaxel has linear PKs.

Conclusions

The main dose-limiting toxicity for PM paclitaxel was neutropenia, and the recommended dose for phase II study is 300 mg/m². PM paclitaxel is superior to conventional paclitaxel for its simplified premedication regimen and delivery of a higher paclitaxel dose without increased neuropathy.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel, to characterize the principal toxicities of the combination, to recommend doses for subsequent disease-directed studies, and to determine whether significant pharmacokinetic interactions occur between these agents when combined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six courses of capecitabine and paclitaxel were administered to 17 patients in a two-stage dose-escalation study. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks, and capecitabine was administered continuously as two divided daily doses. During stage I, capecitabine was escalated to a target dose of 1,657 mg/m(2)/d, whereas the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 135 mg/m(2). In stage II, paclitaxel was increased to a target dose of 175 mg/m(2), and the capecitabine dose was the maximum established in stage I. Pharmacokinetics were characterized for each drug when given alone and concurrently. RESULTS: Myelosuppression, predominately neutropenia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Other toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hyperbilirubinemia, skin rash, myalgia, and arthralgia. Two patients treated with capecitabine 1,657 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs, whereas none of six patients treated with capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs during course 1. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that capecitabine and paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of each other. No major antitumor responses were noted. CONCLUSION: Recommended combination doses of continuous capecitabine and paclitaxel are capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/d IV every 3 weeks. Favorable preclinical mechanistic interactions between capecitabine and paclitaxel, as well as an acceptable toxicity profile without clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions, support the performance of disease-directed evaluations of this combination.     

Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Bortezomib (PS-341), a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, is metabolized by deboronation involving cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A), which also metabolizes docetaxel. Preclinical studies have shown synergy between bortezomib and taxanes. We conducted a phase I study combining bortezomib and docetaxel in refractory solid tumor patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received escalating doses of weekly docetaxel (days 1 and 8) and twice weekly bortezomib (days 2, 5, 9, and 12) in 3-week cycles. Two subjects were enrolled at each dose level, with cohort expansion to six for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Dose levels 1, 2, and 3 consisted of docetaxel/bortezomib 25/0.8, 25/1.0, and 30/1.0 mg/m(2), respectively. CYP3A activity and docetaxel pharmacokinetic studies were conducted, and proteasome inhibition was assessed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received a total of 34 cycles of treatment. Dose level 2 was expanded for DLT that occurred in two of six patients consisting of febrile neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one patient. One patient received two cycles at dose level 3 with dose reduction to dose level 2, where grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred at cycle 3. Both episodes of grade 3 thrombocytopenia were transient (<7 days). Dose level 1 was then expanded to six patients where no DLTs occurred. CYP3A activity and docetaxel clearance did not change between weeks 1 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 25 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) with bortezomib 0.8 mg/m(2) (days 2, 5, 9, and 12) given every 21 days. Bortezomib treatment did not alter CYP3A activity and docetaxel clearance.