Psychiatric and Behavioural Disorders in Children with Epilepsy (ILAE Task Force Report): Adverse cognitive and behavioural effects of antiepileptic drugs in children

The literature was evaluated for cognitive and more general behavioural effects. We distinguished the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), from the newer and newest AEDs. The striking finding was the lack of information on children. From the available evidence it would appear that there may be negative cognitive effects with phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate and zonisamide, and adverse behavioural effects with phenobarbital, valproate, gabapentin, topiramate, levetiracetam and zonisamide. There is inconclusive data on ethosuximide, clobazam, vigabatrin, felbamate, pregabalin, stiripentol, rufinamide, lacosamide and retigabine. The following drugs appear to be neutral with regard to cognitive effects: valproate, carbamazepine, gabapentin and oxcarbazepine. Carbamazepine appears to be neutral with regard to behavioural effects. Positive cognitive effects have been reported with lamotrigine and levetiracetam. Positive behavioural effects have been reported with lamotrigine. Recommendations are provided.     

Newer antiepileptic drugs]

Ten newer antiepileptic drugs have been developed since 1990s. These drugs have wider therapeutic spectra, fewer side-effects, and lesser drug-to-drug interactions compared with the older typical antiepileptic drugs. Among them, zonisamide was developed in Japan and has been used from 1989. Gabapentin was at length approved in 2006. The other newer antiepileptic drugs are not approved yet in Japan. Felbamate can not be used in Europe because it may induce lethal hepatic toxicity and aplastic anemia. Vigabatrin is not approved in USA because it may induce permanent visual field deficit. The USA guideline for epilepsy treatment recommends that patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy can be treated with gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine. In contrast, based on epilepsy treatment guideline in England, newer antiepileptic drugs are considered only when patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy are unable to use the older antiepileptic drugs for some reasons. All newer antiepileptic drugs are used for intractable partial epilepsies, and lamotrigine and topiramate can also be used for idiopathic generalized epilepsies. The response rate (seizure reduction rate with 50% or more) and drop-out rate are overlapping among all newer antiepileptic drugs. Gabapentin, levetiracetam, and pregabalin are eliminated from kidney, and they had no drug-to-drug interactions and can be titrated rapidly. The serum concentration of lamotrigine is decreased with co-administration of hepatic enzyme inducing drugs and is increased with co-administration of valproic acid. Hypersensitivity reactions are rare with gavapentin, levetiracetam, topiramate, and tiagabin. Psychoses are reported to be induced with zonisamide, however, they can be induced with the other newer drugs (topiramate, levetiracetam, etc.). Drug-induced psychiatric symptoms, especially depression, may be often underdiagnosed. Many of these newer drugs (gabapentine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxycarbazepine, etc.) have effects on chronic neuropathic pain. Some newer drugs show mood stabilizing effects (lamotrigine, oxycarbazepine, etc.), or antianxiety effect (gabapentin, topiramate, levetiracetam, pregavalin, etc.). Wide range of action to central nervous system of these newer antiepileptic drugs may serve not only for clinical seizure suppression, but also for neuroprotection.     

Use of antiepileptic drugs for nonepileptic conditions: Psychiatric disorders and chronic pain

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly utilized for nonepileptic conditions, including various psychiatric disorders and pain syndromes. Evidence for their benefit in these nonepileptic conditions varies widely among different drugs, but there is, in general, a paucity of published multicenter randomized double-blind trials. Variable levels of evidence suggest that lamotrigine and the vagal nerve stimulator have antidepressant properties. Carbamazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, and oxcarbazepine appear to have mood stabilizing properties while gabapentin, pregabalin, and tiagabine have anxiolytic benefits. Barbiturates, topiramate, and possibly phenytoin may precipitate or exacerbate depression. Underlying depression and anxiety symptoms may be exacerbated by levetiracetam, while psychotic symptoms have rarely been reported with topiramate, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. Pregabalin, gabapentin, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine have been used to treat neuropathic pain such as postherpetic neuralgia, and diabetic polyneuropathy. Topiramate and divalproex sodium have utility in the prophylaxis or acute treatment of migraine. Further rigorous studies are needed to clarify the utility of AEDs in nonepileptic conditions.     

Meta-analysis and indirect comparisons of levetiracetam with other second-generation antiepileptic drugs in partial epilepsy

Few comparative clinical trials of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with refractory partial epilepsy are available. Therefore, meta-analysis is a widely used and useful method for comparing them. Despite the limitations of indirect comparisons, and recognizing that these drugs were tested at different doses, such comparisons can be helpful to physicians making practical treatment decisions. The purposes of this study were to present newer meta-analysis results for add-on levetiracetam compared with placebo and to estimate its efficacy and tolerability compared with other new AEDs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide) in a meta-analysis using methods for making indirect comparisons. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of add-on therapy with levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide in patients with refractory partial epilepsy were identified in the Cochrane Library 2002. A fixed-effects model was used to estimate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios for the responder rate (efficacy measure) and withdrawal rate (mainly tolerability measure) of levetiracetam and other new AEDs versus placebo. Because no head-to-head clinical trials comparing these new AEDs exist, adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between levetiracetam and each other AED using the meta-analysis results. At the doses tested, levetiracetam was more effective in terms of responder rate than gabapentin (odds ratio 2.64 with 95% CI 1.51-4.63) and lamotrigine (odds ratio 1.86 with 95% CI 1.04-3.34) and equally well tolerated. Levetiracetam had a significantly lower withdrawal rate than topiramate (odds ratio 0.52 with 95% CI 0.29-0.93) and oxcarbazepine (odds ratio 0.55 with 95% CI 0.33-0.92), with comparable efficacy. Although levetiracetam did not differ significantly from the other AEDs, numerical trends favoring levetiracetam were obtained in response rate and in withdrawal rate (tiagabine, zonisamide). Indirect comparisons based on meta-analysis suggest that add-on therapy with levetiracetam has a favorable responder and/or withdrawal rate relative to several AEDs in patients with partial epilepsy with doses used in clinical trials. These meta-analyses give only short-term efficacy and safety data. Comparative clinical trials and long-term studies of these agents are needed to confirm these findings.     

Weight issues for people with epilepsy—A review

Summary   Weight gain or loss is not an integral part of epilepsy although a sedentary lifestyle can contribute to weight gain. Pharmacological treatment for epilepsy may be associated with substantial weight changes that may increase morbidity and impair adherence to the treatment regimen. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) associated with weight loss are felbamate, topiramate, and zonisamide. AEDs associated with weight gain are gabapentin, pregabalin, valproic acid, and vigabatrin and possibly, carbamazepine. Weight neutral AEDs are lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and phenytoin. In clinical practice it is critical to weigh patients regularly and AED selection should be based on each patient's profile without sacrificing therapeutic efficacy.     

Retention of new AEDs in institutionalized intellectually disabled patients with epilepsy

PurposeTo assess the long-term usefulness of ‘new anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs)’ (lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin) in institutionalized intellectually disabled patients. Information from RCTs is lacking in this population with severe intellectual and behavioural disabilities.MethodsRetrospective study. Data from the medical files and the pharmacy databases of 118 institutionalized intellectually disabled patients who had ever used at least one of the new AEDs were analyzed. The main evaluation parameters were the duration of use (using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates) and the reason for discontinuation (lack of efficacy, occurrence of adverse events, or both) of the new AEDs. Drug continuation was based on the evaluation of treatment results by experienced epileptologists, and not on fixed criteria.ResultsNew AEDs were generally tried only after a substantial number of other regimens (with classic AEDs) had failed. The most frequently used new AEDs were lamotrigine (68%) and levetiracetam (58%), followed by topiramate (28%) and gabapentin (8%). The 3-year retention rates were 70% (lamotrigine), 52% (levetiracetam), 51% (topiramate) and 33% (gabapentin). Discontinuation due to “lack of efficacy” occurred in 61% (topiramate), 60% (lamotrigine) and 42% (levetiracetam) of the cases. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 42% (levetiracetam), 33% (topiramate) and 28% (lamotrigine).ConclusionsTreatment of epilepsy with new AEDs was quite often successful in this very therapy-resistant population.     

The adverse event profile of pregabalin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: Despite the widespread use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) across different neurologic and psychiatric disorders, no study has systematically reviewed all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of a given AED to fully uncover its tolerability profile. We aimed at identifying treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) associated with pregabalin through a systematic review and meta‐analysis of all available RCTs. We also assessed the association between serious AEs and pregabalin, and investigated whether pregabalin AEs display a dose–response relationship. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL to February 2010 for RCTs. Additional studies were identified from reference lists of retrieved papers and from online clinical databases. We selected placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs investigating the therapeutic effects of pregabalin in adults with any condition. Studies had to include at least 20 subjects per arm and have a duration of at least 4 weeks. AEs were assessed for their association with pregabalin after identification/exclusion of synonyms, rare AEs, and nonassessable AEs due to methodologic limitations. We used relative risks (RRs) to assess the association of any [99% confidence intervals (CIs)] or serious AEs (95% CIs) with pregabalin, and risk differences (RDs, 95% CIs) to investigate dose–response relationships of pregabalin AEs. Key findings: Thirty‐eight RCTs were included in our study. Of 39 AEs, 20 (51%) were significantly associated with pregabalin (dizziness, vertigo, incoordination, balance disorder, ataxia, diplopia, blurred vision, amblyopia, tremor, somnolence, confusional state, disturbance in attention, thinking abnormal, euphoria, asthenia, fatigue, edema, peripheral edema, dry mouth, constipation). The highest RRs were found for cognition/coordination AEs. There was no significant association between serious AEs and pregabalin. There was a selective dose–response pattern in the onset of pregabalin AEs, with certain AEs appearing at lower doses than others. Significance: Individuals starting treatment with pregabalin are at increased risk for several AEs, particularly those affecting cognition/coordination. Pregabalin AEs appear according to a selective dose–response pattern, possibly reflecting the severity of dysfunction of distinct anatomic structures. These findings may aid clinicians in providing better patient management, and support the value of including in meta‐analyses of AED tolerability profiles RCTs performed in different conditions.     

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs

There are two types of interactions between drugs, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic. For antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic interactions are the most notable type, but pharmacodynamic interactions involving reciprocal potentiation of pharmacological effects at the site of action are also important. By far the most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those involving cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in hepatic metabolism. Among old generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone induce the activity of several enzymes involved in drug metabolism, leading to decreased plasma concentration and reduced pharmacological effect of drugs, which are substrates of the same enzymes (eg, tiagabine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate). In contrast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide do not induce the metabolism of other AEDs. Interactions involving enzyme inhibition include the increase in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and phenobarbital caused by valproic acid. Among AEDs, the least potential interaction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.     

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII)

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.     

The impact of side effects on long-term retention in three new antiepileptic drugs

ObjectiveTo determine long-term retention, percentage of patients withdrawing because of adverse events, percentage of patients achieving seizure freedom, safety profile of the new anti-epileptic drugs lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate.MethodsAll patients treated with lamotrigine, levetiracetam or topiramate in the Epilepsy Centre were identified. Each drug was analyzed from introduction of the drug in the Netherlands up to a final assessment point 2 years later.ResultsData from 1066 patients were included: 336 for lamotrigine, 301 for levetiracetam, 429 for topiramate. Two-year retention rates were 69.2% (lamotrigine), 45.8% (levetiracetam), 38.3% (topiramate); (LTG vs. LEV at p < 0.001; LTG vs. TPM at p < 0.001; LEV vs. TPM at p = 0.005). Seizure freedom rates were lowest for lamotrigine and highest for levetiracetam. Adverse events played a role in drug discontinuation in 154/429 patients (35.9%) on topiramate, 52/336 patients (15.5%) on lamotrigine (p < 0.001), 68/301 patients (22.5%) on levetiracetam (p < 0.001). Mood and general CNS-effects are common in patients on lamotrigine and levetiracetam, and neurocognitive side effects are most prevalent in patients on topiramate. A positive effect on cognition is frequently noted in patients on lamotrigine.ConclusionA drug that is only modestly efficacious but has a favourable safety profile may look better than a drug that is more efficacious but produces clinically meaningful adverse events. Therefore, a drug's retention rate is mainly determined by its side effect profile. As a consequence, retention rate was highest for lamotrigine and lowest for topiramate. Intermediate retention rates were seen with levetiracetam use.     

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the fourth Eilat conference (EILAT IV)

The Fourth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) was held at the Royal Beach Hotel, Eilat, Israel, from 6th to 10th September 1998. Epileptologists and scientists from 20 countries attended the conference, which was held to discuss a number of issues in drug development, including outcome assessment in epilepsy (long-term efficacy, quality of life, safety), cost-effectiveness, an update on drugs in development, a progress report on recently marketed AEDs, and controversies in strategies for drug development. This review focuses on drugs in development and recently marketed AEDs. Drugs in development include ADCI, AWD 131-138, DP16, ganaxolone (CCD 1042), levetiracetam (ucb L059), losigamone, pregabalin (isobutyl GABA [CI-1008]), remacemide hydrochloride, retigabine (D-23129), rufinamide (CGP 33101), soretolide (D2916), TV1901, and 534U87. New information on the safety and efficacy of recently marketed drugs (felbamate, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide) and of a new antiepileptic device, the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP), has become available. This paper summarizes the presentations made at the conference.     

Is Anticonvulsant Treatment of Mania a Class Effect? Data from Randomized Clinical Trials

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of anticonvulsant agents for the treatment of acute bipolar mania and ascertain if their effects on mania are a “class” effect. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with placebo or active comparator, in acute bipolar mania in order to summarize available data on anticonvulsant treatment of mania/mixed episodes. We searched (PubMed/MEDLINE) with the combination of the words “acute mania” and “clinical trials” with each one of the following words: “anticonvulsants/antiepileptics,”“valproic/valproate/divalproex,”“carbamazepine,”“oxcarbazepine,”“lamotrigine,”“gabapentin,”“topiramate,”“phenytoin,”“zonisamide,”“retigabine,”“pregabalin,”“tiagabine,”“levetiracetam,”“licarbazepine,”“felbamate,” and “vigabatrin.” Original articles were found until November 1, 2008. Data from 35 randomized clinical trials suggested that not all anticonvulsants are efficacious for the treatment of acute mania. Valproate showed greater efficacy in reducing manic symptoms, with response rates around 50% compared to a placebo effect of 20–30%. It appears to have a more robust antimanic effect than lithium in rapid cycling and mixed episodes. As valproate, the antimanic effects of carbamazepine have been demonstrated. Evidences did not support the efficacy of the gabapentin, topiramate as well as lamotrigine as monotherapy in acute mania and mixed episodes. Oxcarbazepine data are inconclusive and data regarding other anticonvulsants are not available. Anticonvulsants are not a class when treating mania. While valproate and carbamazepine are significantly more effective than placebo, gabapentin, topiramate, and lamotrigine are not. However, some anticonvulsants may be efficacious in treating some psychiatric comorbidities that are commonly associated to bipolar illness.     

Lecture: profile of risks and benefits of new antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor-related epilepsy

In patients with brain tumor, seizures are the onset symptom in 20-40% of the patients, while a further 20-45% of the patients will present them during the course of the disease. These data are important when considering the choice of antiepileptic drugs for this particular patient population, because brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is often drug resistant, has a strong impact on the quality of life and weighs heavily on public health expenditures. In brain tumor patients, the presence of epilepsy is considered as the most important risk factor for long-term disability. For this reason, the problem of the proper administration of medications and their potential side effects is of great importance, because good seizure control can significantly improve the patient's psychological and relational sphere. In these patients, new generation drugs such as gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, topiramate, and zonisamide are preferred, because they have fewer drug interactions and cause fewer side effects. Among the recently marketed drugs, lacosamide has demonstrated promising results and should be considered as a possible treatment option. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a customized treatment plan for each patient with BTRE, whose goals are complete seizure control, minimal or no side effects, and elimination of cognitive impairment and/or psychosocial problems.     

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Sixth Eilat Conference (EILAT VI)

The Sixth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) took place in Taormina, Sicily, Italy from 7th to 11th April, 2002. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 27 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included dose-response relationships with conventional and recent AEDs, teratogenic effects of conventional and recent AEDs, update on clinical implications of AED metabolism, prevention of epileptogesis, and seizure aggravation by AEDs. According to tradition, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well to updates on AEDs, which have been marketed in recent years. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in preclinical and clinical development, including carabersat (SB-204269), CGX-1007 (Conantokin-G), pregabalin, retigabine (D-23129), safinamide, SPD421 (DP-VPA), SPM 927, talampanel and valrocemide (TV 1901). Updates on fosphenytoin, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide, new formulations of valproic acid, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.     

Treatment of refractory primary generalized epilepsy

Although complete seizure control is achievable in 54% to 82% of patients with primary (idiopathic) generalized epilepsy syndromes, there remains a substantial group with inadequate control. Valproate has been considered the drug of choice but is not always effective and might produce unacceptable adverse effects. Several newer drugs have emerged as potential alternatives to valproate, including lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, and zonisamide. Sedation and tolerance limit the utility of benzodiazepines. For severely refractory patients, drug combinations, vagal nerve stimulation, or felbamate might be considered. Only a few controlled clinical trials have been conducted for these syndromes; more are needed.     

Time course of adverse events in patients with localization-related epilepsy receiving topiramate added to carbamazepine

PURPOSE: To explore the time course of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) during topiramate (TPM) adjunctive therapy. METHODS: Post hoc analyses were performed by using data from a large (264 subjects) multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 200 mg/day TPM was added to carbamazepine (CBZ) with or without another antiepileptic drug (AED) in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. The daily incidence and mean duration of the most common (> or =5% incidence) AEs were calculated for patients completing the 12-week study. RESULTS: The daily incidence of somnolence, headache, loss of appetite, nervousness, fatigue, dizziness, upper respiratory tract infection, and vertigo peaked during titration and declined to rates similar to that of placebo after the target TPM dose had been reached. In contrast, the daily incidence of paresthesia increased during titration and was maintained for the study duration. Relatively few patients had cognitive symptoms (9% with TPM, 5% with placebo), but these were the most common AEs associated with treatment discontinuation. Patient/investigator reports of weight loss increased gradually over the course of the trial, corresponding with the pattern of change in weight measured at study visits. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that most of the more common AEs with TPM adjunctive therapy are transient. Patients can be counseled that most AEs emerging when TPM is initially added to CBZ can be expected to diminish with continued therapy.     

Review of treatment options for refractory epilepsy: new medications and vagal nerve stimulation.

PURPOSE: the choices available for patients whose partial seizures are poorly controlled include seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) as add-on therapy. Comparisons are needed to help physicians and patients select among the options for treatment. METHODS: we compared efficacy and adverse events of new treatments from controlled clinical trials of patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Response rates (> or =50% decrease in partial seizures) at doses recommended in product labeling for adjunct therapy were tabulated for overall success (placebo response rate subtracted from AED response rate). Adverse events listed in product labeling were tabulated as complaint rates (placebo events subtracted from AED events). VNS trials used low dose stimulation as a pseudo-placebo. RESULTS: overall success rates fell into two general groups with ranges of 12-20% for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), zonisamide and 27-29% for levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate (TPM). Summary Complaint Scores also fell into two general groups with ranges of -27 to -82 for GBP, levetiracetam, TGB, zonisamide and -113 to -205 for LTG, oxcarbazepine and TPM. VNS scores were in the lower or higher success and summary complaint categories depending on whether scores from the pseudo-placebo group were subtracted from the high dose group. CONCLUSIONS: these data allow comparisons among AEDs and VNS using similar data from standard types of clinical trials.     

Seizure-free outcome in randomized add-on trials of the new antiepileptic drugs

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to (1) provide clinically useful, previously unpublished comparative analyses of seizure-freedom rates for newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and (2) recommend a standard for data presentation and analysis. METHODS: Data were reviewed from placebo-controlled adjunctive trials in refractory patients of gabapentin (GPN), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TOP), tiagabine (TGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), levetiracetam (LEV), zonisamide (ZNS), and pregabalin (PGB). Seizure-freedom analyses in these publications, if included at all, consistently included both patients who completed the trial, and those who dropped out prior to completion (last observation carried forward, LOCF). This has the potential to increase reported seizure-free outcomes. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted for the provision of unpublished seizure-free data in the patients who completed the entire study. RESULTS: In most cases, LOCF analysis produced a higher rate of seizure freedom compared to complete analysis. A total of 0%-1.1% of the LOCF population was seizure-free in the GPN trials (complete data not available). For the remaining AEDs, seizure-freedom results in the LOCF versus complete populations were: 0.7% versus 0.8% (LTG trial); 12% versus 2.6% (OXC trial); 3.6%-6.4% versus 3.9%-7.1% (LEV trial); 3.7%-7.9% versus 1.3%-1.4% (PGB trial); and 6.0% versus 3.0% (ZNS trial, minus titration period). CONCLUSIONS: By employing LOCF, a clinically unrealistic picture of seizure-free rates may be reported. Access to complete data is informative, as it includes only those patients who were able to tolerate the drug at doses that produced seizure freedom. Ideally, data from both ITT and complete analyses should be made available.     

Long-term tolerability of lamotrigine: data from a 6-year continuation study

This open-label, 6-year continuation study of several short-term clinical trials was conducted to assess the long-term tolerability and efficacy of lamotrigine when used as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy for partial seizures in adult patients (> or =16 years) with epilepsy. Study visits occurred every 24 weeks throughout the treatment period. Of the 527 patients enrolled in the long-term continuation study, 508 were exposed to lamotrigine for at least 6 months (including their exposure in the primary clinical study), and 248 were exposed to lamotrigine for at least 5 years. Of the 527 patients, 75 received initial lamotrigine exposure during this study. Investigators judged that overall clinical status at the end of the study or at time of discontinuation (whichever occurred first) was improved moderately or markedly relative to prelamotrigine clinical status for 36% of patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (regardless of suspected cause) were dizziness, diplopia, and headache. The only serious treatment-emergent adverse event occurring at a frequency exceeding 2% was accidental injury (2.7% of patients). Adverse events prompted 28 patients to discontinue from the study. The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation were dizziness (1.3%), headache (0.8%), rash (0.8%), and somnolence (0.6%). All adverse events resolved without sequelae. Lamotrigine administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy during a 6-year open-label continuation study was associated with a low incidence of adverse events in adult patients with epilepsy.     

Long‐term add‐on pregabalin treatment in patients with partial‐onset epilepsy: Pooled analysis of open‐label clinical trials

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of long‐term pregabalin as add‐on therapy for patients with poorly controlled partial seizures. Methods: Analysis of data from six long‐term clinical trials involving 2,061 patients receiving open‐label pregabalin 75–600 mg/day adjunctive therapy for partial onset epilepsy refractory to multiple antiepileptic drugs. Results: Total pregabalin exposure was 3,877 person‐years. The mean duration of pregabalin treatment was 534 days (range 0.3–8 years) and 59% completed 1 year. One‐third of patients discontinued for lack of efficacy. The most common dose was ≥300 mg/day; over half took ≥450 mg/day. There was a mean reduction in the 28‐day seizure rate of 25–40%, and more than 40% of all patients had a ≥50% reduction in seizures from baseline during the last 3 months of treatment. Twelve percent of all patients had a 6‐month period continuously free of seizures. In the last year, 6% were seizure‐free for the entire year. Pregabalin was generally well‐tolerated and the safety profile favorable in patients treated for up to several years, with an adverse event (AE) profile similar to short‐term placebo‐controlled trials. Common AEs included CNS symptoms (dizziness, somnolence, headache, and asthenia), accidental injury, and weight gain. CNS AEs tended to be mild and transient. Rates of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), mortality, cancer, and status epilepticus were within the expected range for this population. Conclusions: Adjunctive pregabalin was effective, generally well tolerated, and safe in the long‐term treatment of partial seizures, and provided clinically meaningful seizure reduction and freedom without evidence of tolerance over 2 years of follow‐up.