Cost-effective management of chronic stable angina

In certain patients with stable angina who are at moderate to high risk, coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty are the therapeutic options of choice. However, in selected other patients the use of anti-ischemic drug therapy and secondary prevention reduce episodes of myocardial ischemia and result in a good long-term prognosis. Factors affecting management include the extent of coronary disease, the magnitude of cardiac symptoms, the severity of myocardial ischemia and of left ventricular function. Based upon these and other clinical characteristics, patients can be divided into low-, moderate-, or high-risk categories for morbidity and mortality. Patients at high risk are more likely to be selected for myocardial revascularization and patients at low risk are often treated with medical therapy, at least initially. Based on the available cost-effectiveness data, medical therapy or coronary angioplasty are the preferred initial strategies for low-risk coronary disease, whereas coronary bypass surgery (CABG) is recommended for many high-risk patients, particularly for those with triple-vessel disease and impaired left ventricular function or ischemia at a low workload. CABG is cost-effective for patients with severe angina and left main coronary artery disease and also for patients with mild angina and triple-vessel disease. Coronary angioplasty is cost-effective for patients with severe angina, and single- or multivessel disease. In patients with lesser symptoms and mild coronary disease, the cost effectiveness of myocardial revascularization therapy is less likely to be as good as it is in patients with more extensive disease and severe symptoms.     

Treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris.

Patients with angina pectoris may be stratified into low- or high-risk categories on the basis of clinical findings and a careful workup, possibly including nuclear imaging of stress-induced abnormal perfusion or contractile patterns and coronary angiography. High-risk patients may require revascularization by angioplasty or bypass surgery, whereas low-risk patients can be managed medically. It is important to consider the impact of various anti-ischemic drugs on the myocardial demand-supply equation. A recent study indicated that the combination of a beta blocker plus isosorbide mononitrate is more effective in increasing exercise duration than is either the combination of a beta blocker and a calcium antagonist or triple therapy. In patients with single-vessel disease, angioplasty has been shown to be more effective than medical therapy in relieving symptoms, but the incidence of restenosis and the associated costs are high. Surgery favorably affects mortality in patients with left main coronary artery disease or 3-vessel disease with left ventricular impairment. New evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction may play a more important role in chronic stable angina pectoris than has been appreciated and that such dysfunction may be treated with nitrates.     

Bypass surgery for chronic stable angina: predictors of survival benefit and strategy for patient selection

The variable mortality risk associated with chronic stable angina calls for careful selection of patients for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) if the aim of management is to prolong life. The randomized and observational studies done in the last 20 years have identified the variables relevant to patient selection and thus have provided a rational basis for such clinical decisions. These studies showed that the sicker the patient, as gauged by relevant measures of coronary disease and cardiovascular morbidity, the more likely it is that CABG will prolong life. A CABG-related improvement in survival is therefore more likely to occur the worse the left ventricular function; the greater the number of diseased vessels; the more proximal the location of coronary lesions (more muscle is threatened by such lesions); the greater the severity of the lesions as determined by angiography; the more severe the angina; the more easily provocable the ischemia or the more extreme the measures of ischemia; and, within limits, the older the patient. Greater survival gain after CABG also occurs in patients with peripheral vascular disease, in patients with baseline electrocardiographic ST-segment and T-wave changes, and probably in women. Thus, patients are likely to live longer after CABG if they have left main disease; three-vessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 50%), class III or IV angina, provocable ischemia, or disease in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery; two-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement; and two-vessel disease with class III or IV angina as well as either severe left ventricular dysfunction alone or moderate left ventricular dysfunction together with at least one proximal lesion. When the decision of whether to do CABG is less clear-cut, the presence of peripheral vascular disease, female sex, baseline electrocardiographic ST-segment and T-wave changes, or older age (over 60 but under 80 years) should weigh in favor of doing CABG. In general, patients with single-vessel disease do not seem to derive survival benefit from CABG.     

Prinzmetal's variant angina: three case reports and a review of the literature.

Prinzmetal's variant angina is a rare entity. When angina-like symptoms occur at rest, mostly at a specific hour in the early morning, together with transient ST segment elevations and angiographically normal arteries, provocative tests with ergonovine or acetylcholine should be performed. Endothelial dysfunction, a strong thrombotic tendency, an increased platelet aggregation together with changes in autonomic tone can trigger coronary vasospasms. Once treated with calcium antagonists and nitrates the prognosis is excellent and severe complications such as arrhythmias, myocardial infarction or sudden death are extremely rare. Coronary stenting can be useful for refractory coronary spasm, CABG can be used for important coronary atherosclerosis. This review is illustrated with three typical presentations of variant angina: a myocardial infarction without significant organic coronary atherosclerosis, an ergonovine-induced coronary spasm with a non-significant coronary lesion and a multivessel spasm complicated by ventricular arrhythmia. All these three patients became asymptomatic after a treatment with calcium antagonists and nitrates.     

Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of The Princeton Consensus Panel

Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in both sexes and adversely affects patients' quality of life and well being. Given the frequent association between sexual dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, in addition to the potential cardiac risk of sexual activity itself, a consensus panel was convened to develop recommendations for clinical management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Based upon a review of the research and presentations by invited experts, a classification system was developed for stratification of patients into high, low, and intermediate categories of cardiac risk. The large majority of patients are in the low-risk category, which includes patients with (1) controlled hypertension; (2) mild, stable angina; (3) successful coronary revascularization; (4) a history of uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI); (5) mild valvular disease; and (6) no symptoms and <3 cardiovascular risk factors. These patients can be safely encouraged to initiate or resume sexual activity or to receive treatment for sexual dysfunction. An important exception is the use of sildenafil in patients taking nitrates in any form. Patients in the intermediate-risk category include those with (1) moderate angina; (2) a recent MI (<6 weeks); (3) left ventricular dysfunction and/or class II congestive heart failure; (4) nonsustained low-risk arrhythmias; and (5) >/=3 risk factors for coronary artery disease. These patients should receive further cardiologic evaluation before restratification into the low- or high-risk category. Finally, patients in the high-risk category include those with (1) unstable or refractory angina; (2) uncontrolled hypertension; (3) congestive heart failure (class III or IV); (4) very recent MI (<2 weeks); (5) high-risk arrhythmias; (6) obstructive cardiomyopathies; and (7) moderate-to-severe valvular disease. These patients should be stabilized by specific treatment for their cardiac condition before resuming sexual activity or being treated for sexual dysfunction. A simple algorithm is provided for guiding physicians in the management of sexual dysfunction in patients with varying degrees of cardiac risk.     

Anti-angina therapy of coronary heart disease. Mono- or combination treatment]

Applying a metaanalysis, it was examined whether a combination of drugs is superior to monotherapy in the treatment of angina pectoris. The three classical groups of anti-anginal drugs, nitrates, calcium channel blockers and beta-receptor blockers were investigated. For data analysis, patients were divided in those suffering from "angina pectoris" and those suffering from "angina pectoris despite monotherapy." In patients with the inclusion criterium "angina pectoris" combination of drugs is not superior to monotherapy. This applies to the evaluation criteria "improvement of symptoms" and "reduction of ischemia". In patients with the inclusion criterium "angina pectoris despite monotherapy" however, there is a clear superiority of drug combination as compared to monotherapy. Again this applies to the evaluation criteria "improvement of symptoms" and "reduction in myocardial ischemia". With respect to antianginal efficacy all three possible combinations appear to be similar. If the evaluation criterium is "improvement of prognosis" no data are available with regard to drug combination. Furthermore no data are available on the prognostic effect of an anti-anginal therapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. A significant improvement of prognosis could be demonstrated for beta-receptor blocking agents without ISA in unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and in the postinfarction period. The effect of calcium channel blockers on prognosis depends on the substance class applied and on the presence or absence of signs of congestive heart failure. Monotherapy with nifedipine in instable angina and acute myocardial infarction fails to improve prognosis, and there even may be a tendency to adverse effects. In the absence of signs of congestive heart failure verapamil has been demonstrated to improve prognosis in the post infarction period. Likewise, improvement of prognosis by the administration of diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction only could be demonstrated in patients without signs of heart failure. In contrast, in patients with signs of congestive heart failure diltiazem increased the rate of reinfarction and mortality. For nitrates only in acute myocardial infarction a trend towards improved prognosis has been shown. Especially for nitrates the data on prognosis in coronary heart disease available so far are not convincing.     

Use of cardiovascular medical therapy among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: results from the ROSETTA-CABG registry

INTRODUCTION: Secondary prevention is needed following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to reduce the subsequent risk of unstable angina, myocardial infarction and death. However, little research exists on the use of cardiovascular medical therapy in CABG surgery patients. The objective of the present study is to describe the use of cardiovascular medical therapy among patients discharged after CABG surgery. METHODS: The use of acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, warfarin, antilipid agents, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, nitrates and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was examined among 320 patients enrolled in the Routine versus Selective Exercise Treadmill Testing After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (ROSETTA-CABG) Registry. Logistic regression identified the determinants of medication use at 12 months following CABG surgery. RESULTS: Most patients were male, hyperlipidemic and underwent CABG surgery for relief of angina symptoms. At admission, discharge and at 12 months, acetylsalicylic acid was used in 71%, 92% and 87% of cases, respectively, and some form of antiplatelet agent was used in 74%, 94% and 89% of cases, respectively. The use of antilipid agents remained constant, from 55% at admission to 57% at discharge. However, 24% of patients were not receiving antilipid agents at 12 months. The use of beta-blockers was 57% at admission, 71% at discharge and 64% at 12 months. The use of calcium channel blockers and nitrates decreased modestly from admission to discharge and remained stable at approximately 20% and 22%, respectively, at 12 months. ACE inhibitor use remained stable, from 33% at admission to 38% at 12-months. Hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity and pre-CABG surgery left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% were all found to be important determinants of 12-month medication use. Importantly, the use at discharge was an important determinant of 12-month use of for each medication examined in the present study. CONCLUSIONS: The use of antilipid agents, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors was found to be too low among post-CABG surgery patients, who are known to benefit from their use, and the use of nitrates was too high. Discharge from hospital provides a unique opportunity for physicians to modify the use of cardiovascular medical therapy among patients undergoing CABG surgery.     

Managing the hypertensive patient with ischemic heart disease

Thiazide diuretics, b-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are all superior to placebo for the primary prevention of coronary events in patients with hypertension. Recent studies have shown that ACE inhibitors are better than other antihypertensive agents in lowering overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially stroke. Blood pressure should be aggressively lowered (to < 140/90 mm Hg), especially in diabetic patients (to < 130/80 mm Hg), but care should be exercised in lowering the diastolic blood pressure below 65 mm Hg in patients with significant occlusive coronary artery disease. Hypertension in patients with stable angina should be treated with a b-blocker (alternatively a calcium channel blocker) together with an ACE inhibitor. Patients with hypertension and acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or myocardial infarction) should be treated with a b-blocker, and with an ACE inhibitor if there is left ventricular dysfunction. A thiazide diuretic and/or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker could be added for blood pressure control. Calcium channel blockers should be avoided if there is significant left ventricular dysfunction.     

Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries: the pathologic and clinical perspectives

Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries is a syndrome resulting from numerous conditions but the exact cause in a majority of the patients remains unknown. Cigarette smokers and cocaine users are more prone to develop this condition. The possible mechanisms causing myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries are hypercoagulable states, coronary embolism, an imbalance between oxygen demand and supply, intense sympathetic stimulation, non-atherosclerotic coronary diseases, coronary trauma, coronary vasospasm, coronary thrombosis, and endothelial dysfunction. It primarily affects younger individuals, and the clinical presentation is similar to that of myocardial infarction with coronary atherosclerosis. Thrombolytics, aspirin, nitrates, and beta blockers should be instituted as a standard therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Once normal coronary arteries are identified on subsequent angiography, the calcium channel blockers could be added since coronary vasospasm appears to play a major role in the pathophysiology of this condition. The beta blockers should be avoided in cocaine-induced myocardial infarction because the coronary spasm may worsen. In myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries, complications such as malignant arrhythmia, heart failure, and hypotension are generally less common, and prognosis is usually good. Recurrent infarction, postinfarction angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death are rare. Stress electrocardiography and imaging studies are not useful prognostic tests and long-term survival mainly depends on the residual left ventricular function, which is usually good.     

Large vessel coronary vasospasm: diagnosis, natural history and treatment

The diagnosis of coronary artery spasm is confirmed by angiography, for example, change in caliber of the coronary arteries plus evidence of ischemia. The prevalence and contribution of coronary artery spasm in the individual patient with symptoms of ischemic heart disease is not known and depends on how the condition is defined. The prognosis of patients with coronary artery spasm appears to depend on the presence or absence of severe coronary atherosclerosis, that is, those with severe disease have a worse prognosis. Nitrates should be used to initiate therapy in all patients with this problem. Intravenous nitrates have proven useful in patients whose symptoms are difficult to control and who require hospitalization. beta blockers used alone may be detrimental in patients with coronary artery spasm, but studies supporting the detrimental effects are few. The combination of nitrates, beta blockers and nifedipine has proved effective therapy for many patients with recurrent angina at rest, possibly related to coronary artery spasm. Several open-label and double-blind placebo control trials have shown that all of the calcium antagonists are effective short-term agents for patients with proven coronary artery spasm. When nifedipine was compared with isosorbide dinitrate in a randomized crossover, double-blind trial in patients with coronary artery spasm, both drugs were shown to be efficacious and neither was superior. The traditional alpha-blocking agents have not been shown to be an effective therapy, but a recent study of prazosin, a selective alpha blocker, revealed excellent results in patients whose conditions were resistant to therapy with traditional calcium blockers, beta blockers and, in 1 case, phenoxybenzamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Akute Koronarsyndrome – ein Update Teil II: Koronare Revaskularisation und Risikostratifizierung

CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION: PTCA in patients with refractory unstable angina is associated with a substantial risk of the following complications: death, myocardial infarction, need for emergency surgery, and restenosis. The introduction of intracoronary stents, however, has improved both short-term and long-term outcomes. The newer adjunctive pharmacologic therapies enhance even further the benefits associated with the use of stents. The decision regarding the specific revascularization procedure to be used (e.g., CABG, PTCA, stent placement, or atherectomy) is based on the coronary anatomy, the left ventricular function, the experience of the medical and surgical personnel, the presence or absence of coexisting illnesses, and the preferences of both the patient and the physician. RISK STRATIFICATION: Among patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, there is an increased risk of death within 6 weeks in those with elevated troponin I levels and the risk of death continues to increase as the troponin level increases. Reversible ST segment depression is associated with an increase by a factor of 3-6 in the likelihood of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia at rest, or provocable ischemia during a test to stratify risk. Exercise or pharmacologic stress testing provides important information about a patient's risk. Although the conditions of the majority of patients with unstable angina will stabilize with effective antiischemic medications, approximately 50-60% of such patients will require coronary angiography and revascularization because of the "failure" of medical therapy. High-risk patients are those who have had angina at rest, prolonged angina, or persistent angina with dynamic ST segment changes or hemodynamic instability, and they urgently require simultaneous invasive evaluation and treatment. Medical therapy should be adjusted rapidly to relieve manifestations of ischemia and should include antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, or ticlopidine or clopidogrel if aspirin is contraindicated), antithrombotic therapy (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin), beta-blockers, nitrates, and possibly calcium-channel blockers. Early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may be particularly important, especially in high-risk patients with positive troponin tests or those in whom implantation of coronary stents is anticipated.     

Changing concepts in the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia

The principal common pathway for myocardial ischemia is an oxygen supply-demand imbalance; more recently, greater emphasis has been placed on limitations of myocardial blood supply, as well as excessive myocardial oxygen demand. Myocardial ischemia is a metabolic event resulting from inadequate oxygen delivery to local tissues. The physiologic effects of ischemia are observed through abnormalities in left ventricular function, electrocardiographic changes, and often, by angina pectoris. Prognostic and therapeutic outcomes are significantly related to the pathophysiology of the underlying coronary lesion. Because myocardial ischemia often occurs without symptoms, clinical distinctions based on angina stability may more appropriately be represented by stable or unstable ischemic syndromes that incorporate silent ischemia. Stable ischemic syndromes occur secondary to coronary plaques, whereas unstable syndromes are the result of active lesions caused by plaque rupture with local thrombus and vasoreactivity that produce intermittent critical decreases in coronary supply. The prognosis of patients with stable ischemia is related to the extent of myocardium at jeopardy and overall left ventricular function. In contrast, unstable syndromes are associated with a worse short-term prognosis, which may be predictable by the presence of silent ischemia or left ventricular dysfunction or both. Therapeutic decisions based on an improved pathophysiologic understanding of ischemic mechanisms as well as the physiologic impact of therapy on cardiac function can enhance efficacy while avoiding adverse effects. Calcium channel blockers appear to afford certain advantages in the treatment of myocardial ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Revascularization treatment recommendations based on atherosclerotic disease distribution: Coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting

In patients with coronary artery disease, the need for more accurately defined treatment recommendations based on the distribution of atherosclerotic disease has given rise to multiple trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervntion (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To clarify these treatment recommendations, we reviewed relevant trials. Patients with chronic stable angina who have one-vessel or two-vessel coronary artery disease without involvement of the left main or left anterior descending coronary arteries fare similarly regardless of treatment modality. In contrast, patients with multivessel disease and inducible ischemia are better served by revascularization by either CABG or PCI. In patients who have left main involvement, diffuse disease with severe atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, advanced age, or left ventricular dysfunction, the outcome with regard to survival, anginal relief, and freedom from additional intervention is better with CABG than with PCI.     

Treatment of stable angina.

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many nonobstructive plaques, which are prone to fissures or rupture resulting in presentation of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). In addition to symptomatic relief of symptoms and an increase in angina-free walking time with antianginal drugs or revascularization procedures, the recent emphasis of treatment has been to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (coronary death and myocardial infarction). The role of smoking cessation, aspirin, treatment of elevated lipids, and treatment of high blood pressure in all patients and of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diminished systolic left ventricular systolic function in reducing adverse outcomes has been well established. What is unknown, however, is whether any anti-anginal drugs (beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium channel blockers) effect adverse outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris. Recent trials evaluated the usefulness of suppression of ambulatory ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris, but it remains to be established whether suppression of ambulatory myocardial ischemia with antianginal agents or revascularization therapy is superior to pharmacologic therapy targeting symptom relief. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical treatment and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for newer techniques of transmyocardial revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, or sympathectomy. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized clinical trials.     

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention and medical therapy for multivessel disease with and without left ventricular dysfunction

Multiple randomized trials support the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and relatively normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, there has been a paucity of trials in the recent literature that have compared the outcomes of patients with multivessel CAD and low EF who undergo PCI or CABG. This review examines some of the clinical trials and series in this subgroup of patients and also compares the outcome of patients undergoing either procedure in the absence and presence of LV dysfunction. These trials and series support the notion that PCI can be successfully performed in patients with low EF with relatively low mortality, but that CABG is associated with greater freedom from repeat revascularization and from angina or congestive heart failure symptoms. In addition, most of the data published thus far indicate a long-term survival advantage among patients with ventricular dysfunction who have undergone CABG. Further studies, including randomized trials incorporating the evolving techniques of CABG and the recent advances in PCI, will be needed to assess the proper role and outcome of these two interventions.     

Nicardipine, a new calcium channel blocker: role for vascular selectivity

Calcium channel blockers are important drugs for the treatment of chronic stable angina. However, negative inotropic and dromotropic effects may limit their usefulness in patients with atrioventricular conduction abnormalities or left ventricular dysfunction. A new generation of calcium channel blockers will soon be available that have a more vascular selective action than currently available agents. Of the new agents, nicardipine has been most extensively studied. In experimental studies, nicardipine is more specific for vascular smooth muscle than for cardiac smooth muscle and for coronary than peripheral vasculature. In controlled trials, nicardipine exhibited efficacy and safety that was comparable to older calcium blockers or beta blockers. However, nicardipine was associated with minimal negative inotropic or dromotropic effects even in patients with existing left ventricular dysfunction. Thus, nicardipine may have an advantage over existing calcium channel blockers, especially in patients with underlying cardiac disease.     

Treatment of the Elderly Post-Myocardial Infarction Patient

Coronary risk factors should be modified in older persons after myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin 160–325 mg daily and β blockers should be administered indefinitely. Anticoagulants should be administered post-MI to patients unable to tolerate daily aspirin, to those with persistent atrial fibrillation, and to those with left ventricular thrombus. Nitrates, along with βblockers, should be used to treat angina pectoris. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be administered after MI to patients who have congestive heart failure, an anterior MI, or a left ventricular ejection fraction of =40%. There are no class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers after MI. Complex ventricular arrhythmias should be treated with βblockers. Persons with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or who are at very high risk for sudden cardiac death after MI should receive an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. There are no class I indications for the use of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women after MI. Indications for coronary revascularization after MI in older individuals are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.     

Variant Angina and Aborted Sudden Cardiac Death

Purpose of Review

Variant angina, which is characterized by recurrent chest pain and transient ECG changes along with angiographic evidence of coronary artery spasm, generally has a favorable prognosis. However, episodes of ischemia caused by vasospasm may lead to potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest, even in patients with no history of prior cardiac disease. This review describes the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical spectrum, and management of variant angina, as well as outcomes in patients who present with aborted sudden cardiac death (ASCD).

Recent Findings

Contrary to prior opinions, evidence from recent observational studies indicate that patients with variant angina presenting with ASCD face a worse prognosis than those without this type of presentation. Predictors of ASCD include age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of sudden cardiac death, multi-vessel spasm, and left anterior descending artery spasm. Medical therapy alone with calcium channel blockers and nitrates may not be sufficiently protective in these patients and there is lack of concrete data on the optimal management strategy. Current guidelines recommend implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients who are survivors of cardiac arrest caused by ventricular fibrillation or unstable ventricular tachycardia after reversible causes are excluded, and should strongly be considered in these patients.

Summary

Although medical therapy is absolutely imperative for patients with variant angina and a history of ASCD, ICD therapy in these patients is justified. Further large-scale studies are required to determine whether ICD therapy can improve survival in this high-risk group of patients.

     

Medical therapy versus myocardial revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome and stable angina

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of death in the United States. Angina is encountered frequently in clinical practice. Effective management of patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina should consist of therapy aimed at symptom control and reduction of adverse clinical outcomes. Therapeutic options for angina include antianginal drugs: nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ranolazine, and myocardial revascularization. Recent trials have shown that although revascularization is slightly better in controlling symptoms, optimal medical therapy that includes aggressive risk factor modification is equally effective in reducing the risk of future coronary events and death. On the basis of the available data, it seems appropriate to prescribe optimal medical therapy in most patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina, and reserve myocardial revascularization for selected patients with disabling symptoms despite optimal medical therapy.     

Unstable angina

Patients with unstable angina, defined as resting chest pain associated with transient repolarization changes on the electrocardiogram, represent a high risk subset among the clinical manifestations of ischemic heart disease. Pathogenetic mechanisms include coronary spasm and vasoconstriction, coronary thrombosis and platelet aggregation. Early prognosis is related to the degree of activity of the disease while long-term outcome depends on the extent of the coronary disease and the degree of left ventricular dysfunction. Medical treatment should include the combination of beta-blockers, nitrates and calcium antagonists as well as the use of heparin and aspirin. Despite such an aggressive treatment, attacks of resting chest pain persist in almost 30 per cent of patients. In these cases emergency revascularization may be achieved by either coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. The latter operation may result in improved survival in patients with impaired left ventricular function and triple vessel disease.